OP-1206, a prostaglandin E1 derivative, attenuates the thermal hyperesthesia induced by constriction injury to the sciatic nerve in the rat

Comparisons between the efficacy of limaprost alfadex and pregabalin in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy : design of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is a relatively common neurological disease caused by the mechanical compression of nerve roots. Limaprost, a prostaglandin E₁ derivative, functions as a vasodilator and has been used in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in Japan. However, the effects of limaprost in cervical radiculopathy remain unclear. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of limaprost with that of pregabalin, which is widely used for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, patients with CSR received either limaprost or pregabalin orally for 8 weeks, along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The primary outcomes were assessed using a numerical rating scale of pain and numbness, both at rest and during movement. Secondary outcomes were assessed using Short Form-36, provocation tests, painDETECT questionnaire, and subjective global assessment. The obtained data were evaluated according to the per-protocol analysis principle.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study, and 35 were available for analysis. A greater reduction in pain score was observed in neck pain during movement, and scapular and arm pain both at rest and during movement in the pregabalin-treated group up to 4 weeks. In the limaprost-treated group, numbness of the arm during movement showed a marked alleviation compared to the pregabalin-treated group at 8 weeks. There were no apparent differences between the two groups in terms of the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pregabalin provided an earlier pain relief than limaprost, limaprost was superior to pregabalin in treating arm numbness. Limaprost might be one of the effective therapeutic options for CSR in primary care settings.

Limaprost alfadex and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for sciatica due to lumbar spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

Limaprost, a prostaglandin E1 analog, has vasodilatory properties and increases blood flow of the nerve root. However, it has not been clarified whether limaprost affects pain sensation associated with radiculopathy due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral limaprost with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for radiculopathy.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Patients with LSS who had radicular-type neurologic intermittent claudication assessed based on a self-reported diagnostic support tool were randomized into three treatment groups. Limaprost, NSAIDs, or limaprost plus NSAIDs were administered orally for 6 weeks. Leg pain, low back pain (LBP) and the associated symptoms were assessed by a numerical rating scale (NRS) both at rest and on movement as well as the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) and Short Form (SF)-36.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Each treatment finally reduced radicular pain, and the improvement was prominent in a combination treatment. There were no significant differences in radicular pain among three groups at final follow-up. LBP was not influenced by limaprost, and a significant reduction of LBP and RDQ was confirmed in a combination treatment compared with limaprost. Physical function of the SF-36 subscales after a combination treatment showed a marked alleviation compared with NSAIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

These obtained findings suggest that the effects of limaprost seem to be limited to radicular pain, not for LBP. Overall, a combination treatment might be more effective in the management of radiculopathy induced by LSS than monotherapy with either agent.