1
|
Jin D, pan Y, Jin W, Yan Y, Huang L, Wang J. Clinical Study on the Combination of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation and Lidocaine for Preventing Propofol Injection Pain. J Pain Res 2022; 15:745-755. [PMID: 35313663 PMCID: PMC8934144 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s356150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Propofol is a widely used intravenous anesthetic in clinical practice. Lidocaine pretreatment is currently the most commonly used method to reduce the pain of propofol injection. However, propofol injection pain has not been eliminated and its incidence remains high. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation is a green therapy that combines transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy with the traditional acupuncture therapy of our motherland. This study investigated the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) combined with lidocaine in preventing propofol injection pain and determined whether it can reduce postoperative complications and promote rapid postoperative recovery of patients. Patients and Methods A total of 220 women scheduled to undergo hysteroscopic surgery were enrolled in the study. The included patients were randomly divided into four groups of 55 patients each: normal saline group (group K), lidocaine group (group L), TEAS group (group T), and lidocaine + TEAS group (group L + T). Patients in group K received 2 mL saline (0.9% NaCl) pre-injection before anesthesia induction. Group L received 40 mg lidocaine pre-injection (2 mL of 2% lidocaine) before anesthesia induction. Group T received 30 min of transcutaneous electrical stimulation at bilateral election Hegu, Neiguan, and 2 mL saline pre-injections before anesthesia induction. Group L + T received TEAS and lidocaine pre-injection. Results The VAS scores and the four-point verbal rating scale of propofol injection were significantly different among the four groups. The prevalence of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension after surgery among the four groups were statistically different. The bleeding days after surgery were significantly different among the four groups. Conclusion TEAS combined with lidocaine pre-injection reduced the incidence of propofol injection pain and significantly reduced patients’ pain levels compared with single lidocaine pre-injection. TEAS can also reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension, shorten postoperative bleeding days, and accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuanyuan pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenjun Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yixiu Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Luping Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junlu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Junlu Wang, Departments of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13806689854, Fax +86 577-55578999-689854, Email
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nimmaanrat S, Jongjidpranitarn M, Prathep S, Oofuvong M. Premedication with oral paracetamol for reduction of propofol injection pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19:100. [PMID: 31185906 PMCID: PMC6560875 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0758-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To compare the effect of premedication with 2 different doses of oral paracetamol to prevent pain at propofol intravenous injection. Methods We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial in which patients scheduled for induction of general anesthesia with intravenous propofol received either a placebo, 500 mg or 1000 mg of oral paracetamol (P500 and P1000, respectively) 1 h prior to induction. Two mg/kg of propofol was injected at a rate of 600 ml/hr. After 1/4 of the full dose had been injected, the syringe pump was paused, and patients were asked to rate pain at the injection site using a verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) from 0 to 10. Results Three hundred and twenty-four patients were included. Pain intensity was lower in both P500 and P1000 groups (median VNRS [interquartile range] = 2 [0–3] and 4 [2–5], respectively) than in the placebo group (8 [7–10]; P < 0.001)*. The rate of pain was lower in the P1000 group (70.4%) than in both the P500 and the placebo group (86.1 and 99.1%, respectively; P < 0.001)*. The respective rates of mild (VNRS 1–3), moderate (VNRS 4–6) and severe pain (VNRS 7–10) were 47.2, 23.2 and 0% in the P1000 group, 28.7, 50 and 7.4% in the P500 group, and 0, 22.2 and 76.9% in the placebo group (P < 0.001* for between group comparisons). Tolerance was similar in the 3 groups. Conclusions A premedication with oral paracetamol can dose-dependently reduce pain at propofol intravenous injection. To avoid this common uncomfortable concern for the patients, this well-tolerated, available and cheap treatment appears as an option to be implemented in the current practice. Trial registration TCTR20150224002. Prospectively registered on 24 February 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasikaan Nimmaanrat
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
| | - Manasanun Jongjidpranitarn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
| | - Sumidtra Prathep
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
| | - Maliwan Oofuvong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Başak N, Aksoy Y, Kaydu A, Şahin ÖF. Lornoxicam use to reduce the pain associated with propofol injection. Libyan J Med 2017; 12:1313093. [PMID: 28449627 PMCID: PMC5418937 DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2017.1313093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the efficacy of lornoxicam in the prevention of the pain associated with propofol injection. Material and method: Approval for this study was granted by the ethics committee of our hospital. Using a computer randomisation software, 120 patients undergoing elective surgery were assigned to four equal groups. In Group I (control group), immediately before anaesthesia induction, 10 ml of isotonic 0.9% NaCl solution (placebo) was administered intravenously (IV). In Groups II, III and IV, the same injection contained 2 mg, 4 mg and 8 mg of lornoxicam respectively. A tourniquet was then applied to the forearm for two minutes. Pain evaluation was made using a verbal pain score. Results: Differences in pain severity scores were statistically significant between Groups I and II, Groups I and III, Groups I and IV and between Groups II and III (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was determined between Groups III and IV (p = 0.401). Conclusion: In all groups administered with lornoxicam, there was a significant reduction in the severity of pain associated with propofol injection, in comparison with the control group. Maximum effect is obtained with a dose of 4 mg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nihal Başak
- a Selahaddin Eyyübi State Hospital , Diyarbakır , Turkey
| | - Yakup Aksoy
- b Department of Anesthesiology , Bismil State Hospital , Diyarbakır , Turkey
| | - Ayhan Kaydu
- a Selahaddin Eyyübi State Hospital , Diyarbakır , Turkey
| | - Ömer Fatih Şahin
- b Department of Anesthesiology , Bismil State Hospital , Diyarbakır , Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lang BC, Yang CS, Zhang LL, Zhang WS, Fu YZ. Efficacy of lidocaine on preventing incidence and severity of pain associated with propofol using in pediatric patients: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6320. [PMID: 28296748 PMCID: PMC5369903 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propofol injection pain was considered as one conundrum during clinical anesthesia. The systematic review about the effect of lidocaine in reducing injection pain among children has not been established. The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of such intervention. METHODS The literature search was performed from the inception to the May 31, 2016 in PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane database. All randomized controlled trials that using lidocaine for propofol injection pain in children were enrolled. The primary outcome included the incidence of injection pain and the incidence of propofol injection pain in different degrees. The data were combined to calculate the relative ratio and relevant 95% confidence interval. A meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the PRISMA statement. RESULTS Data from the included 11 studies indicated that the incidence of injection pain was lower in lidocaine group than the incidence in saline control group and in propofol lipuro (medium- and long-chain triglycerides) group (pain occurrence: 22.1% in lidocaine vs 66.8% in saline, RR with 95% 0.34 [0.26, 0.43], I = 38%; 30.5% in lidocaine vs 46.9% in propofol lipuro, RR with 95% 0.68 [0.46, 1.00], I = 9%). There was no difference between lidocaine and ketamine/alfentanil both in reducing pain occurrence and in reducing pain severity (pain occurrence: 29.7% in lidocaine vs 25.8% in ketamine, RR with 95% 1.47 [0.16, 13.43], I = 94%; 31.0% in lidocaine vs 30.7% in alfentanil, RR with 95% 1.01 [0.69, 1.46], I = 11%). And the reported side effects revealed that the safety of lidocaine in pediatric patients was acceptable. CONCLUSION Compared with ketamine and alfentanil, lidocaine would be served as one more effective treatment in consideration of its well-matched efficacy, acceptable accessibility, and reasonable safety. However, more high-quality evidences in pediatric patients are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing-chen Lang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital
| | - Chun-song Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital
| | - Ling-li Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital
| | - Wen-sheng Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-zhi Fu
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The effect of intravenous dexamethasone and lidocaine on propofol-induced vascular pain: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. PAIN RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2013; 2013:734531. [PMID: 23956857 PMCID: PMC3728499 DOI: 10.1155/2013/734531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2013] [Revised: 06/25/2013] [Accepted: 06/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background. The mechanism for pain associated with intravenous administration of propofol is believed to be related to the release of nitric oxide. We hypothesized that pain following propofol injection would be reduced by pretreatment with dexamethasone. Methods. One hundred fourteen female subjects received 5 mL of preservative-free saline, 0.5 mg·kg−1 of lignocaine hydrochloride 10 mg·mL−1 or 0.25 mg·kg−1 of dexamethasone, intravenously, following exsanguination and occlusion of the veins of the arm. This was followed by a 0.5 mg·kg−1 injection of propofol. Pain scores, facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, and vocalization were recorded prior to and at 15 and 30 seconds following the injection of propofol. Results. The incidence of moderate to severe pain following the injection of propofol was significantly decreased with both lidocaine and dexamethasone. Hand withdrawal was also significantly decreased in comparison to saline. Conclusion. Low dose dexamethasone is commonly used as an antiemetic, and, in larger doses, it has been demonstrated to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia. At higher analgesic doses, dexamethasone may also reduce pain associated with the injection of propofol. This effect is probably related to the effect of the steroid on nitric oxide production associated with intravenous propofol injection.
Collapse
|
6
|
Picard P, Tramèr MR. Prevention of Pain on Injection with Propofol: A Quantitative Systematic Review. Anesth Analg 2000. [DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200004000-00035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 302] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
7
|
Abstract
Pain on injection of propofol is a common problem, the cause of which remains unknown. The chemical properties and preparation of propofol, proposed mechanisms for the cause of the pain and clinical strategies to prevent pain on injection of propofol are reviewed in the hope of shedding some light on the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Tan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
Lidocaine and No Carrier Fluid for the Prevention of Pain Due to Injection of Propofol. Anesth Analg 1996. [DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199605000-00057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|