Hemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to insertion of the Combitube, laryngeal mask airway or tracheal intubation

Second generation laryngeal mask airway during laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

The second-generation laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a higher sealing pressure than classical LMA and can insert the gastric drainage tube. We investigated the difference in respiratory variables according to the use of second-generation LMA and endotracheal tube (ETT) in laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy (LLDH). In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, intraoperative arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure at 2 h after the airway devices insertion (P_aCO_{2_}2h) was compared as a primary outcome. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group LMA (n = 45, used Protector LMA), or Group ETT (n = 43, used cuffed ETT). Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory variables including mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were compared. Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary aspiration were recorded. The P_aCO_{2_}2h were equally effective between two groups (mean difference: 0.99 mmHg, P = 0.003; 90% confidence limits: − 0.22, 2.19). The intraoperative change in MBP, HR, and PIP were differed over time between two groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.015, and P = 0.039, respectively). There were no differences of the incidence of postoperative complications at 24 h following LLDH (sore throat and hoarseness: P > 0.99, PONV: P > 0.99, and P = 0.65, respectively). No case showed pulmonary aspiration in both groups. Compared with endotracheal tube, second-generation LMA is equally efficient during LLDH. The second-generation LMA can be considered as the effective airway devices for securing airway in patients undergoing prolonged laparoscopic surgery.

Trial Registration This study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (https://cris.nih.go.kr. CRiS No. KCT0003711).

Guided vs. non-guided insertion of Ambu AuraGain™ in edentulous patients

BACKGROUND

Supraglottic airway devices perform more poorly and have lower oropharyngeal leak pressure in edentulous patients than in patients with teeth. The Ambu Aura Gain is a newer second generation supraglottic airway device.

OBJECTIVE

This randomized clinical trial assessed the oropharyngeal leak pressure in edentulous patients using the Ambu Aura Gain with a gastric tube for insertion guidance and without insertion guidance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status I-III were recruited. Primary outcome was oropharyngeal leak pressure after insertion. Secondary outcome parameters were oropharyngeal leak pressure 15 min and 30 min after insertion, insertion time, insertion attempts and glottis view through flexible fiberscope.

RESULTS

In this study 72 patients aged between 51 and 90 years (mean 73 years) were randomly allocated to the "with guidance" (n = 36) or the "without guidance" group (n = 36). Mean (SD) oropharyngeal leak pressure in "with guidance" and "without guidance" group was 24 cm H₂O and 24 cm H₂O (ns), respectively. A difference was found in mean insertion time with guidance versus without guidance group 52 s (45 s) vs. 26 s (15 s) (p < 0.001). No difference was found in any of the other secondary outcome parameters.

CONCLUSION

A guided insertion technique does not improve oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Ambu AuraGain™ in edentulous patients. As the only difference is an increase in insertion time this technique is of no benefit for this population.

Effect of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion versus Endotracheal Intubation over Hemodynamic Responses in Pediatrics Patient Who Underwent Ophthalmic Surgery at Menelik II Hospital, Addis Ababa: A Prospective Observational Study Design

Background

The airway of an anesthetized child is usually maintained with an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway. However, both are related with some level of pressor response which may be risky in several groups of patient.

Methods

An institutional-based prospective observational study design was employed. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Data were entered into Epi info version 7 and transported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Normality of the data was checked using Shapiro-Wilk tests. An independent t test was used to determine the mean differences between the two groups while the paired sample t test was used to determine the mean differences within the groups. A p value of less than 0.05 was used as a cut-off point for the presence of association.

Results

The changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were returned to baseline values at five and three minutes in both groups, respectively. However, the changes in the heart rate and mean arterial pressure returned to baseline values in five minutes in the ETT group and three minutes in the LMA group. At baseline, the difference in systolic blood pressure between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.328).

Conclusions

A significant hemodynamic pressor response was observed after the insertion of both LMA and ETT groups. However, the LMA group has less hemodynamic change as compared to the ETT group. Therefore, the practice of LMA insertion was strongly recommended.

Comparison of combitube, easy tube and tracheal tube for general anesthesia

Background & Aims:

The Combitube^® and EasyTube™ enable effective ventilation whether placed in the trachea or esophagus and can be used in prehospital settings, as well as in “Cannot Ventilate Cannot Intubate” situations in the operating room. Whether they can be continued to provide general anesthesia, if required, is not established. Thus the efficacy of Combitube and EasyTube was evaluated and compared with the tracheal tube for general anesthesia using controlled ventilation.

Materials and Methods:

Combitube, EasyTube and tracheal tubes were used in 30 patients each to secure the airway in a randomized controlled manner. Ventilatory parameters were measured along with hemodynamic variables, and characteristics related to device placement.

Results:

There was no significant difference in the various ventilatory parameters including minute ventilation requirement to maintain eucapnia amongst the three groups at any time point. There was no hypoxia or hypercarbia in any patient at any time. Placement of EasyTube was more difficult (P = 0.01) as compared with both Combitube and tracheal tube. EasyTube and Combitube resulted in higher incidence of minor trauma than with a tracheal tube (P = 0.00).

Conclusion:

Combitube and EasyTube may be continued for general anesthesia in patients undergoing elective nonlaparoscopic surgeries of moderate duration, if placed for airway maintenance. Given the secondary observations regarding placement characteristics of the airway devices, it, however cannot be concluded that the devices are a substitute for endotracheal tube for airway maintenance per se, unless specifically indicated

[Extraglottic airway devices in the intensive care unit]

Extraglottic airway devices (EGA) are not only used in routine anaesthesia practice, they also have a distinct value for in-hospital and out-of-hospital difficult airway management. In the environment of the intensive care unit (ICU) EGA are not used on a regular basis. However, expertise and knowledge regarding EGA coming from the operating theatre or the out-of-hospital setting may also be of value for the ICU setting. This review presents the potential indications for EGA on the ICU for the management of difficult airway situations as well as during percutaneous tracheotomy. Furthermore, the possible advantages of EGA during postoperative recovery from anaesthesia as well as termination of controlled ventilation for intensive care patients are discussed.

Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Supraglottic airway devices such as the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) and Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway (LTS) that provoke the least stress responses could be beneficial in many situations, especially in patients with cardiovascular disease. We compared the haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response of the LTS and PLMA in a randomised study of 36 patients. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were all reduced following induction of anaesthesia with no significant differences between the two groups. Following insertion of LTS, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels increased to pre-induction levels. However, following the insertion of the PLMA, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels remained significantly lower than pre-induction values. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate and epinephrine were significantly greater in the LTS group than in the PLMA group. We conclude that the LTS produces a greater and more sustained haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response than does the PLMA.

Prehospital trauma care

Concepts regarding uniform reporting of data after trauma and regarding treatment of brain trauma patients at the scene have recently been agreed upon in consensus processes. Endotracheal intubation and alternatives are as controversially discussed as fluid resuscitation and helicopter transport of trauma victims. Long-term outcomes of trauma patients should more frequently be studied using the Quality of Wellbeing Scale.

Airway management

The last decade of the millennium has witnessed the introduction of new extratracheal airway devices for use in fasted patients undergoing ambulatory anaesthesia. A growing awareness of the potential of such devices in the difficult airway has contributed to their increasing use.