The Laryngeal Tube S: a modified simple airway device

Insertion Success of the Laryngeal Tube in Emergency Airway Management

Background. Emergency airway management (AM) is a priority when resuscitating critically ill or severely injured patients. The goal of this study was to determine the success rates of LT insertion during AM. Methods. Studies that included LT first-pass insertion (FPI) and overall-pass insertion (OPI) success by emergency medical services and in-hospital providers performing AM for emergency situations as well as for scheduled surgery published until July 2014 were searched systematically in Medline. Results. Data of 36 studies (n = 1,897) reported a LT FPI success by physicians of 82.5% with an OPI success of 93.6% (p < 0.001). A cumulative analysis of all 53 studies (n = 3,600) led to FPI and OPI success of 80.1% and 92.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. The results of 26 studies (n = 2,159) comparing the LT with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) demonstrated a FPI success of 77.0 versus 78.7% (p = 0.36) and an OPI success of 92.2 versus 97.7% (p < 0.001). Conclusion. LT insertion failed in the first attempt in one out of five patients, with an overall failure rate in one out of 14 patients. When compared with the LT, the LMA had a cumulative 5.5% better OPI success rate.

Extraglottic airway devices: A review

Extraglottic airway devices (EAD) have become an integral part of anesthetic care since their introduction into clinical practice 25 years ago and have been used safely hundreds of millions of times, worldwide. They are an important first option for difficult ventilation during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital difficult airway management and can be utilized as a conduit for tracheal intubation either blindly or assisted by another technology (fiberoptic endoscopy, lightwand). Thus, the EAD may be the most versatile single airway technique in the airway management toolbox. However, despite their utility, knowledge regarding specific devices and the supporting data for their use is of paramount importance to patient's safety. In this review, number of commercially available EADs are discussed and the reported benefits and potential pitfalls are highlighted.

[Taking over a patient with preclinical laryngeal tube]

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the most effective method for securing the airway. However, the practice and theory of ETI differ considerably. There is a wide gap between reality and the optimum of quality and quantity required by many specialist organizations, e.g., the European Resuscitation Council. Alternative airway devices, such as a laryngeal tube, can be useful provided the hospital staff know how the device functions and how to avoid or control complications.

[Implementation of the laryngeal tube for prehospital airway management: training of 1,069 emergency physicians and paramedics]

OBJECTIVE

The European Resuscitation Council recommends that only rescuers experienced and well-trained in airway management should perform endotracheal intubation. Less trained rescuers should use alternative airway devices instead. Therefore, a concept to train almost 1,100 emergency physicians (EP) and emergency medical technicians (EMT) in prehospital airway management using the disposable laryngeal tube suction (LTS-D) is presented.

METHODS

In five operational areas of emergency medicine services in Germany and Switzerland all EPs and EMTs were trained in the use of the LTS-D by means of a standardized curriculum in the years 2006 and 2007. The main focus of the training was on different insertion techniques and LTS-D use in children and infants. Subsequently, all prehospital LTS-D applications from 2008 to 2010'were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

None of the 762 participating EMTs and less than 20% of the EPs had previous clinical experience with the LTS-D. After the theoretical (practical) part of the training, the participants self-assessed their personal familiarity in using the LTS-D with a median value of 8 (8) and a range of 2-10 (range 1-10) of 10 points (1: worst, 10: best). Within the 3-year follow-up period the LTS-D was used in 303 prehospital cases of which 296 were successfully managed with the device. During the first year the LTS-D was used as primary airway in more than half of the cases, i.e. without previous attempts of endotracheal intubation. In the following years such cases decreased to 40% without reaching statistical significance. However, the mean number of intubation attempts which failed before the LTS-D was used as a rescue device decreased significantly during the study period (2008: 2.2 ± 0.3; 2009: 1.6 ± 0.4; 2010: 1.7 ± 0.3).

CONCLUSION

A standardized training concept enabled almost 1,100 rescuers to be trained in the use of an alternative airway device and to successfully implement the LTS-D into the prehospital airway management algorithm. Because the LTS-D recently became an accepted alternative to endotracheal intubation in difficult airway scenarios, the number of intubation attempts before considering an alternative airway device is steadily decreasing.

[Extraglottic airway devices in the intensive care unit]

Extraglottic airway devices (EGA) are not only used in routine anaesthesia practice, they also have a distinct value for in-hospital and out-of-hospital difficult airway management. In the environment of the intensive care unit (ICU) EGA are not used on a regular basis. However, expertise and knowledge regarding EGA coming from the operating theatre or the out-of-hospital setting may also be of value for the ICU setting. This review presents the potential indications for EGA on the ICU for the management of difficult airway situations as well as during percutaneous tracheotomy. Furthermore, the possible advantages of EGA during postoperative recovery from anaesthesia as well as termination of controlled ventilation for intensive care patients are discussed.

[Prehospital airway management of laryngeal tubes. Should the laryngeal tube S with gastric drain tube be preferred in emergency medicine?]

Laryngeal tubes (LT) are increasingly being used for emergency airway management. This article reports on two patients in whom out-of-hospital intubation with a single-lumen LT was associated with massive pulmonary aspiration in one patient and gastric overinflation in the other. In both cases peak inspiratory pressures exceeded the LT leak pressure of approximately 35 mbar. This resulted in gastric inflation and decreased pulmonary compliance and increased inspiratory pressure further, thereby creating a vicious circle. It is therefore recommended that laryngeal tube suction (LTS) should be used in all cases of emergency airway management and a gastric drain tube be inserted through the dedicated second lumen. Apart from gastric overinflation, incorrect LT/LTS placement must be detected and immediately corrected, e.g. in cases of difficult or impossible gastric tube placement, permanent drainage of air from the gastric tube, decreasing minute ventilation or an ascending capnography curve.

A comparison of the clinical use of the Laryngeal Tube S?and the ProSeal�Laryngeal Mask Airway by first-month anaesthesia residents in anaesthetised patients

The Laryngeal Tube S and the LMA-ProSeal are supraglottic instruments with an improved airway seal and a drainage tube to protect against regurgitation and to facilitate passage of a gastric tube. We compared the feasibility of these two instruments in a randomised, controlled clinical trial. One hundred and sixty patients were randomly allocated to undergo insertion of a Laryngeal Tube S (n = 82) or an LMA-ProSeal (n = 78). All insertions were carried out by first-month anaesthesia residents. Success rates were not significantly different: Laryngeal Tube S 89%, LMA-ProSeal 95%. There was also no significant difference in leak pressure or insertion time. Insertion time decreased significantly when we compared the first with the last 10 insertions. Gastric tube placement was successful in all patients in the Laryngeal Tube S group, but failed in 12 patients in the LMA-ProSeal group (p < 0.001). Dysphagia was reported by 22% of Laryngeal Tube S group and 3% of LMA-ProSeal group (p = 0.001). These findings demonstrate the applicability of the devices and a learning effect in the hands of anaesthesia residents with limited experience.

Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Supraglottic airway devices such as the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) and Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway (LTS) that provoke the least stress responses could be beneficial in many situations, especially in patients with cardiovascular disease. We compared the haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response of the LTS and PLMA in a randomised study of 36 patients. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were all reduced following induction of anaesthesia with no significant differences between the two groups. Following insertion of LTS, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels increased to pre-induction levels. However, following the insertion of the PLMA, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, epinephrine and norepinephrine levels remained significantly lower than pre-induction values. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate and epinephrine were significantly greater in the LTS group than in the PLMA group. We conclude that the LTS produces a greater and more sustained haemodynamic and catecholamine stress response than does the PLMA.

A new supraglottic airway, the Elisha Airway Device: a preliminary study

We describe the Elisha Airway Device (EAD), a new reusable supraglottic ventilatory device. Its uniqueness consists of its ability to combine three functions in a single device: ventilation, blind and/or fiberoptic-aided intubation without interruption of ventilation, and gastric tube insertion. This study was performed in 70 ASA status I-II, Mallampati class I-II patients undergoing elective knee arthroscopy and receiving general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol and was maintained with isoflurane in N20/oxygen. Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with vecuronium. Blind insertion of the device was successful in 96% of patients, with a mean insertion time of 20 +/- 4 s. In these patients it was possible to maintain oxygenation and ventilation throughout the surgical procedure. Gastric tube insertion was successful in all cases. Endotracheal intubation via the EAD was attempted in 20 patients. Blind intubation was possible during the first and second attempts in 15 and 2 patients, respectively. Fiberoptic intubation was then successful in two of the remaining three patients. The EAD is a new alternative in the evolution of supraglottic ventilatory devices; however, further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate its efficacy.