Unusual cause of an absent capnogram

A novel airway device with tactile sensing capabilities for verifying correct endotracheal tube placement

We present a new device for verifying endotracheal tube (ETT) position that uses specialized sensors intended to distinguish anatomical features of the trachea and esophagus. This device has the potential to increase the safety of resuscitation, surgery, and mechanical ventilation and decrease the morbidity, mortality, and health care costs associated with esophageal intubation and unintended extubation by potentially improving the process and maintenance of endotracheal intubation. The device consists of a tactile sensor connected to the airway occlusion cuff of an ETT. It is intended to detect the presence or absence of tracheal rings immediately upon inflation of the airway occlusion cuff. The initial study detailed here verifies that a prototype device can detect contours similar to tracheal rings in a tracheal model.

Endotracheal tube cuff leaks: causes, consequences, and management

The consequences of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff leak may range from a bubbling noise to a life-threatening ventilatory failure. Although the definitive solution is ETT replacement, this is often neither needed nor safe to perform. Frequently, the leak is not caused by a structural defect in the ETT. Cuff underinflation, cephalad migration of the ETT (partial tracheal extubation), misplaced orogastric or nasogastric tubes, wide discrepancy between ETT and tracheal diameters, or increased peak airway pressure can cause leaks around intact cuffs. Correction of these problems will stop the leak without ETT replacement. Alternatively, ETT cuff, pilot balloon, and inflation system damage due to inadvertent trauma or manufacturing defects may be responsible. Conservative management ideas (management without ETT replacement) were previously published to solve the problem. However, when a large structural defect is identified or conservative measures fail, ETT replacement becomes necessary. This can be performed with direct laryngoscopy if laryngeal visualization is adequate. A difficult exchange with possible airway loss should be anticipated, and prepared for, when there are signs and/or history of difficult intubation. A risk/benefit analysis of each individual situation is warranted before decisions are made on how best to proceed. Alternative back-up ventilation plans should be preformulated and the necessary equipment ready before the exchange. In this review, various management concerns and plans are discussed, and a simple algorithm to manage leaky ETT cuff situations is presented.

Verification of endotracheal tube position

The goals of tracheal intubation are to place the tube in the trachea and to position the tube at an appropriate depth inside the trachea. Various clinical signs and technical aids are described to verify tracheal intubation and to diagnose esophageal intubation. Many of these methods fail under certain circumstances. Not all these methods can be applied in every intubation, but it is essential that the clinician involved in tracheal intubation have the necessary airway management skills, perform these tests accurately, and interpret the results correctly. Prioritization of these tests depends on many factors, including familiarity, availability of monitors, and the location of intubation. Viewing the tube passing between the cords during direct laryngoscopy and visualization of the tracheal rings and carinae with a fiberoptic scope after intubation are the only fullproof methods of confirming tracheal intubation. In the nonarrested patient, carbon dioxide monitoring quickly can differentiate tracheal from esophageal intubation. In the arrested patient, however, carbon dioxide monitoring can be unreliable, although it can be useful as a prognostic indicator of the efficacy of resuscitation. Devices such as [figure: see text] the self-inflating bulb and esophageal detector device may be more useful in patients with cardiac arrest, but they also can yield false results. Placing the distal tip of the tube in the middle of the trachea can be accomplished by positioning the upper end of the cuff 2 cm below the cords during direct laryngoscopy or by placing the distal tip of the tube 4 cm above the carinae with the aid of a fiberoptic scope. The position of the tube always should be verified by clinical assessment (e.g., auscultation). If direct visualization cannot be done, referencing the marks on the tube, transillumination techniques, or cuff maneuvers can be helpful. In the emergency and critical care settings, a chest radiograph easily can detect malpositioned tracheal tubes that may not be detected by routine clinical assessment. Other techniques (e.g., use of fiberoptic scopes, cuff maneuvers, transillumination) can decrease the need for frequent chest radiographs. Based on available information, two algorithms are proposed: one for emergency intubation (Fig. 9) and the other for verification of tracheal tube position in elective intubation (Fig. 10). These algorithms are designed [figure: see text] to assist the clinician and should not be substituted for clinical judgment. Under no circumstances should clinical signs be ignored in the presence of conflicting information from monitors and technical aids.

Capnography alone is imperfect for endotracheal tube placement confirmation during emergency intubation

This analysis primarily sought to determine the effectiveness of end-tidal capnography for tube placement confirmation during emergency airway management. Secondary objectives were validation of the rate of unanticipated esophageal placement during emergency intubation and quantification of the portion of intubations performed in patients with cardiac arrest where capnography is not recommended. The study was performed in two phases. For the primary objective, a meta-analysis was performed on all experimental capnography trials enrolling emergency populations. For the secondary objectives, inadvertent esophageal intubation and cardiac arrest rates were calculated from a large prospective multicenter observational study of emergency intubation cases. Data analysis included calculation of descriptive statistics, sensitivity, specificity, and confidence intervals (CI). Based on 2,192 intubations, a meta-analysis of previous capnography trials resulted in an aggregate sensitivity of 93% (95% CI 92-94%) and an aggregate specificity of 97% (CI 93-99%) for emergency tube placement confirmation. Thus, for emergency capnography use, the false-negative failure rate (tube in trachea but capnography reports esophagus) was 7% and the false-positive rate (tube in esophagus but capnography reports trachea) was 3%. This translates to potential harm for one patient in every 10 treated with capnographic confirmation alone (number needed to harm: 14 for false-negative, 33 for false-positive, and 10 for both). A further literature review demonstrated no sole method of tube placement confirmation is completely foolproof. Of 4,602 consecutive intubations reported to the National Emergency Airway Registry, 4% of emergency intubation attempts resulted in accidental esophageal intubation, and 10% occurred in nontraumatic cardiac arrest patients. During tracheal intubation of critically ill patients, it is concluded that the rate of accidental esophageal tube placement warrants continued improvement in emergency airway techniques. Misidentification of esophageal placement in the emergency setting may occur with capnography. Multiple methods of tube placement confirmation are superior to any single method because no single method has perfect accuracy.

Use of capnography delaying the diagnosis of tracheal intubation

There was a delay in making the correct diagnosis of tracheal intubation in a parturient who developed severe bronchospasm after intubation because we relied on the capnogram.

Nellcor Stat Cap differentiates oesophageal from tracheal intubation

A trial of the Nellcor Stat Cap, which detects exhaled carbon dioxide, as an aid to determining whether endotracheal tubes are placed in the oesophagus or the trachea, was carried out in the neonatal unit of this hospital. Twenty five neonates, with a mean (range) gestational age of 33 (24-42) weeks and a mean (range) birthweight of 2.17 (0.54-4.1) kg were studied over two months. These babies underwent a total of 58 intubations and 20 suspected self-extubations. The Nellcor Stat Cap was easy to use. It confirmed clinical findings on 20/20 occasions when the endotracheal tube was in the oesophagus and on 57/58 (98%) occasions when it was in the trachea. On 14/78 (19%) occasions the machine provided helpful additional information in reaching a decision on the adequacy of tube placement. Failure to detect rapidly accidental oesophageal intubation or unintentional tracheal extubation can result in rapid deterioration of the condition of ventilated newborns. The machine is a valuable aid to intubation and rapid diagnosis of self-extubation.

Absence of a capnogram after positive end-expiratory pressure

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on capnography.

DESIGN

The study design was experimental and open, and it was performed in the Anesthesiology Experimental Research Laboratory.

METHODS

Six dogs (9.8 +/- 0.8 kg) were anesthetized and intubated. The animals' lungs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 137 +/- 34 ml and a respiratory frequency of 34 +/- 10 breaths/min to produce a PaCO2 of 35 to 45 mm Hg. Application of 20 cm H2O of PEEP was initiated for 1 minute, then repeated twice after 10-minute stabilization periods. Arterial pH and gas tensions were measured, and capnogram, airway gas flow, and airway pressure were recorded continuously. Airway gas flow was electronically integrated to calculate tidal volume.

RESULTS

Mean values before application of PEEP were as follows: pHa, 7.37 +/- 0.04 mm Hg; PaCO2, 37.1 +/- 3.2 mm Hg; PaO2, 93.4 +/- 1.6 mm Hg; and PETCO2, 32.0 +/- 3.5 mm Hg. Compliance of the ventilator circuit was 3.3 ml/cm H2O. Mean deflation lung-thorax compliance was 41.5 +/- 10.3 ml/cm H2O. After application of PEEP, no capnogram was reported for 1 to 6 breaths, an average of 2.7 +/- 1.8 breaths.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that absence of gas flow immediately after the application of PEEP may transiently abolish a capnogram when the lung volume increases.