Han HH, Min KH. Is split-thickness skin graft safe for coverage of the vascular pedicle in free tissue transfer?
J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2019;
53:138-142. [PMID:
30676836 DOI:
10.1080/2000656x.2018.1547737]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
If the pedicle is compressed after microanastomosis during free flap reconstruction, additional tissue such as skin graft or vascularized flap is needed to avoid tension. Performing a skin graft directly on the vessel might cause considerable problems. We aimed to analyze the safety of skin grafting on the anastomosis site of the free flap.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 15 patients who underwent skin grafting on the anastomosis site were analyzed. The skin graft take-up rate and flap-related complications were evaluated postoperatively.
RESULTS
All involved sites were the extremities (10 hands and 5 feet). An anterolateral thigh free flap in six patients and a toe pulp free flap in nine patients were harvested. The mean follow-up period was 10.4 ± 6.2 months. The graft area for the pedicle was 2.8 ± 1.6 cm2. The percentage of final graft take was 99.3 ± 1.2% at 30 days postoperatively without flap compromise.
CONCLUSION
During free flap surgery in the upper or lower extremities, inadequate pedicle coverage may occur easily. Applying a split-thickness skin graft in such cases can be safe and one of the simple methods.
Collapse