Reconstruction of an extensive vulvectomy defect using the gluteus maximus fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap

Perforator versus Non-Perforator Flap-Based Vulvoperineal Reconstruction-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced vulvoperineal cancer require a multidisciplinary treatment approach to ensure oncological safety, timely recovery, and the highest possible quality of life (QoL). Reconstructions in this region often lead to complications, affecting approximately 30% of patients. Flap design has evolved towards perforator-based approaches to reduce functional deficits and (donor site) complications, since they allow for the preservation of relevant anatomical structures. Next to their greater surgical challenge in elevation, their superiority over non-perforator-based approaches is still debated.

METHODS

To compare outcomes between perforator and non-perforator flaps in female vulvoperineal reconstruction, we conducted a systematic review of English-language studies published after 1980, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series. Data on demographics and surgical outcomes were extracted and classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to derive a pooled estimate of complication frequency (%) in patients who received at least one perforator flap and in patients who received non-perforator flaps.

RESULTS

Among 2576 screened studies, 49 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 1840 patients. The overall short-term surgical complication rate was comparable in patients receiving a perforator (n = 276) or a non-perforator flap (n = 1564) reconstruction (p* > 0.05). There was a tendency towards fewer complications when using perforator flaps. The assessment of patients' QoL was scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

Vulvoperineal reconstruction using perforator flaps shows promising results compared with non-perforator flaps. There is a need for the assessment of its long-term outcomes and for a systematic evaluation of patient QoL to further demonstrate its benefit for affected patients.

Gluteus Maximus Transfer as an Augmentation Technique for Patients With Severe Abductor Deficiency of the Hip

Impaired abductor function of the hip following severe abductor deficiencies can be devastating for functionality and quality of life. Recently, gluteus maximus transfer has been proposed as a solution to these difficult problems. However, outcome results are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of gluteus maximus transfer on improvement of pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with severe hip abductor deficiencies. Gluteus maximus transfer was performed in 16 patients with severe disruption of the abductor muscles of the hip. Data were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 to 2 years after surgery. The measurements pertained to complications, healing of the flap based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (in 10 patients), evaluation of Trendelenburg gait and sign, and patient-reported outcome measures of pain, disability, and quality of life. Preoperatively, all patients had a positive Trendelenburg sign and reported severe pain at the level of the greater trochanter. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, the Trendelenburg sign was negative in 7 patients and the Trendelenburg gait had disappeared in 7 patients. There was an improvement in patient-reported outcome measures but not to a significant level except for the pain subscores. Two patients had a postoperative seroma that resulted in a visible bump on the lateral side. Seven of 10 repairs with MRI follow-up showed perfect ingrowth on MRI without signs of rerupture. Gluteus maximus transfer for abductor deficiency of the hip may be effective for pain relief and functional improvements. Most patients showed an improved quality of life but were not completely pain free. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e299-e305.].

Vulvar Reconstruction by Perforator Flaps: Algorithm for Flap Choice Based on the Topography of the Defect

OBJECTIVE

Many techniques have been proposed to reconstruct acquired vulvar defects. In our experience, every type of vulvar defect can be repaired with 2 pedicled flaps, namely, the pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the lotus petal flap (LPF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report our reconstructive algorithm for vulvar reconstruction, based on the topography of the defect, applied in 22 consecutive patients from 2000 to 2012. According to the proposed algorithm, DIEP flap and LPF (monolateral or bilateral type) can repair all kinds of wide vulvar defects. Surgical defects were classified as type I (IA and IB) and type II in relation to the anatomy of the defect.

RESULTS

No major complications were reported in our series. All patients reported satisfactory results, both functionally and aesthetically.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an easy classification of acquired vulvar defects separating the ones consequent only to the vulvar resection, with preservation of vagina (type I), by the wider defects after vaginal and vulvar resection (type II); type I can be subclassified into defects consequent to half-vulvar resection (type IA) or to total vulvar resection (type IB). Type I defects (IA and IB) can be reconstructed with monolateral or bilateral LPF; in type II resections, we have a great wound that required more tissue to fill the pelvic dead space, so we prefer pedicle DIEP flap.

Surgical technique: Transfer of the anterior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle for abductor deficiency of the hip

BACKGROUND

Loss of the abductor portions of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles due to THA causes severe limp and often instability.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

To minimize the symptoms of limp and instability, the anterior ½ of the gluteus maximus was transferred to the greater trochanter and sutured under the vastus lateralis. A separate posterior flap was transferred under the primary flap to substitute for the gluteus minimus and capsule. To ensure tight repair, the flaps were attached and tensioned in abduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The technique was performed in 11 patients (11 hips) with complete loss of abductor attachment; the procedure was performed in nine patients during THA and in two later as a secondary procedure. Preoperatively, all patients had abductor lurch, positive Trendelenburg sign, and no abduction of the hip against gravity. Minimum followup was 16 months (mean, 33 months; range, 16-42 months).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, nine patients had strong abduction of the hip against gravity, no abductor lurch, and negative Trendelenburg sign. One patient had weak abduction against gravity, negative Trendelenburg sign, and slight abductor lurch. One patient failed to achieve strong abduction, had severe limp after 6 months of protection and physical therapy, and was lost to followup.

CONCLUSIONS

Gluteus maximus transfer can restore abductor function in THA with a high success rate.

Local Fasciocutaneous Infragluteal (FCI) Flap for Vulvar and Vaginal Reconstruction: A New Technique in Cancer Surgery

Introduction

Soft tissue reconstruction after vulvar, vaginal, or anal cancer resection poses a formidable task for reconstructive surgeons because of the functional, locational, and cosmetic importance of this region. Although numerous flaps have been designed for vulvar reconstruction, each has its disadvantages.

Methods

The authors introduce the local fasciocutaneous infragluteal (FCI) flap for vulvar and vaginal reconstruction after tumor resection, vaginal scar obliteration, and vulvar ulceration in 15 patients operated on between 1999 and 2007. The FCI flap is supplied by the cutaneous branch of the descending branch of the inferior gluteal artery. The sensory supply of this flap comes from side branches of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh. A total of 17 flaps were performed in 15 patients.

Results

Except for one, all flaps survived. One flap necrosis occurred because of false postoperative position with compression and tension to the vascular pedicle. In the remaining patients, we found one local cancer recurrence with necessity of a second flap from the contralateral side. The patients report satisfaction with reconstruction, without one having pain at donor site and recurrent vaginal ulceration.

Conclusions

This article discusses the expanding indications of this versatile flap and the operative technique of the local FCI flap for reconstruction of vulvar and partial vaginal defects. It can be raised in different volume and dimension out of possible irradiated area with an inconspicuous scar.

Reconstruction of an extensive perineal defect using two modified V-Y flaps based on perforators from the gluteus maximus muscle

SUMMARY

We report the case of a women with severe perineal defect secondary to a perianal cancer that required reconstruction from the posterior wall of the urinary bladder to the coccyx, and which laterally surpassed both ischial tuberosities. For this reconstructive work, we used two V-Y advanced flaps taken from the gluteal region. On the basis of these flaps, we modified the final position in the advance of the lateral ends, crossing the tips of each flap over each other to provide a greater volume of tissue in the central area, with no signs of vascular injury. We believe that the use of V-Y flaps, based on the perforating arteries of the gluteus maximus, allows the reconstruction of especially extensive defects in the perineal region. The technique is rapid and easy perform, and produces acceptable clinical outcome and minimum morbidity.

Gluteus maximus flap transfer for greater trochanter reconstruction in revision THA

We evaluated the results of an operative technique used in five patients (five hips) to reconstruct the greater trochanter with a gluteus maximus flap transfer during revision total hip arthroplasty. We exposed the hip through a posterior approach that split the gluteus maximus in its midsubstance. We then raised a flap from the posterior portion of the gluteus muscle that was elevated proximally to create a triangular muscle flap. The flap was sewn into the gap between the greater trochanter and lateral cortex of the femur and secured to the inner surface of the anterior capsule of the hip. With the hip abducted 10 degrees to 15 degrees, the edges of the gluteus maximus were closed over the flap and the greater trochanter. We compared the results of these patients with those of five patients (five hips) who had the trochanter left unrepaired and those of four patients (four hips) who had excision of the greater trochanter and suture closure of the intervening gap. The flap group had less pain, lower incidence of limp and Trendelenburg sign, and less need for support than the other two groups, but range of motion decreased.

Flap algorithm in vulvar reconstruction after radical, extensive vulvectomy

The objective of this study was to assess the reconstructive options after radical, extensive vulvectomy; relate them to tumor characteristics; and select a choice of flaps able to correct every remaining defect. This study is a retrospective review of a 4-year experience with 31 flaps in 20 consecutive vulvar reconstructions. Three of the 31 flaps presented nonsignificant delayed healing at their tips and 3 other flaps developed a major breakdown related to an infection or an error in flap planning. According to the authors, the size of the defect is the main issue that must be taken into consideration during the establishment of reconstructive needs. Closure of vulvar defects is preferably performed using fasciocutaneous flaps, which are very reliable flaps and can be raised with different techniques to meet different needs. A flap is then chosen with the fewest potential complications. An algorithm has been thus established: Small to medium-size defects are closed with island V-Y flaps, island gluteal fold flaps, or pedicled pudendal thigh flaps. Among them, the island V-Y flap is the workhorse flap for vulvar reconstruction because of its versatility, reliability, and technical simplicity compared with its very low complication rate. If the vulvar defect is large and/or reaches the vulva-crural fold, V-Y flaps are also preferred to close these large and posteriorly extended excisions. If the vulvar defect is very large, extending both anteriorly and posteriorly, the use of a distally based, vertically oriented rectus abdominis muscle flap is recommended. Using this algorithm, immediate vulvar reconstruction with pedicled local or regional flaps can be performed easily and reliably.

The prevention and management of treatment related morbidity in vulval cancer

The traditional and the most common management of primary vulval cancer is radical surgery of the vulva and radical groin lymphadenectomy (unilateral or bilateral). Adjuvant radiotherapy is used in poor prognosis cases. Rare vulval cancers, locally advanced cancers and recurrent vulval cancers often are treated with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The treatments, while often curative, are associated with considerable morbidity, which, until recently, has not been well publicized or quantified. Increasingly, younger patients are presenting with extensive and often multi-focal pre-invasive disease and with vulval cancer. Long-term post-treatment physical, sexual and psychological morbidity is of major concern. There is more onus on clinicians to provide less radical but equally curative treatment, while also reducing morbidity. There is also the need to provide treatment and treatment modification based on supporting evidence. For a rare disease such as vulval cancer it is more difficult to generate data and to conduct trials on treatment modifications. Although surgical modifications have been made, the morbidity of radical surgery for vulval cancer is considerable. The prevention and management of treatment-related morbidity will continue to challenge the gynaecological oncology team.

Squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva: locally advanced disease

About 30-40% of vulvar cancers present with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) (clinical) stage III or IV disease. Although surgical staging was introduced by FIGO in 1988 and hard data on this system are still relatively few, a review of our own patients suggests that this percentage of patients with advanced stage vulvar cancer probably still holds. We have considered carcinoma of the vulva to be locally advanced when the primary or recurring tumour cannot be locally managed by a radical vulvar resection. Current approaches to the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer include ultraradical surgery, radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and a combination of treatment modalities. This chapter reviews the current approaches to the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer.