ABDOMINAL PUNCTURE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE INTRAPERITONEAL DISEASE

Ascites: ultrasound guidance or blind paracentesis?

The classic site for paracentesis in generalized ascites is in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen at a position equivalent to McBurney's point. Its use has an average success rate of 58%, depending on the amount of liquid. To assess the efficacy of paracentesis at this site and to establish the ideal site for blind puncture, we studied 27 consecutive patients with ascites detected by abdominal ultrasonography. The amount of ascites was graded from 1 to 4. Free fluid had accumulated mostly in the perihepatic region, then around the bladder and in the right paracolic gutter, and finally in the left flank. In six of the eight patients in whom fluid was found in the left or right flank, air-filled bowel loops were observed between the abdominal wall and the fluid, in the expected path of a blind puncture. These findings suggest that the safety and efficacy of paracentesis would be greatly improved by ultrasonographic guidance.

Diagnostic, percutaneous peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma: rationale, technique and results

The records of 90 consecutive adult patients, who presented after blunt abdominal trauma and who underwent diagnostic, percutaneous peritoneal lavage over a 3 year period, were reviewed. Lavage effluents were considered positive, negative or equivocal. An equivocal result was one where the tubing contained blood stained fluid, but it was still possible to see newsprint through the tubing. Fifty-one lavages were positive, 24 negative and 15 equivocal. All 51 patients with a positive effluent and three of the patients with an equivocal effluent had a laparotomy and in all but one case a significant injury was found. There were no false negative results. In a single patient the transverse colon was perforated during the insertion of the lavage catheter. Diagnostic, percutaneous peritoneal lavage is a simple, safe, rapidly performed, accurate technique designed to detect intraperitoneal blood and the results of this review suggest that it has a role to play in the decision-making process when assessing adult patients who have suffered blunt abdominal trauma.

Peritoneal lavage and scintigraphic evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

The emergency management of blunt abdominal trauma requires rapid assembly of accurate information. But history, physical findings and conventional tests may be unreliable. As a result, peritoneal lavage is an integral part of the initial diagnostic protocol in many centers. However, confusion in interpretation, especially of "weak positives," can result in delayed or unnecessary celiotomy. In our regional trauma center, lavage is now reserved for selected cases based on experience with 1,833 cases "scanned" during a five-year period. The indications, contraindications, techniques, interpretation, advantages, disadvantages, and complications of lavage and scanning are presented. A protocol using radionuclide imaging for initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma is proposed and representative case studies are included to support this approach.

Abdominal lavage in blunt trauma

A technique for abdominal lavage is described and was used to evaluate the abdomen of 671 multiple trauma victims. In 44 per cent (299 cases) there was a bloodstained return and these were regarded as positive. Patients with a positive result underwent exploratory laparotomy which revealed that 89 per cent had significant intra-abdominal trauma requiring a surgical procedure, 8 per cent had trauma which did not require any active surgical correction and 3 per cent had no abdnormal findings. Of all the lavages performed, there were 0-11 per cent false positive and 0-03 per cent false negative results. The value of the test in the context of multiple trauma is emphasized.