A Dependable Method for Constant Intravenous Therapy in Infants Using Polyethylene Tubing

Cephalic vein cutdown at the wrist: comparison to the standard saphenous vein ankle cutdown

We first developed a technique for cutdown of the cephalic vein at the wrist. We then conducted a prospective cross-over cadaver study comparing the ability of medical students to perform this technique with that of the standard saphenous vein cutdown at the ankle. All students had a previous course in anatomy but had never performed a cutdown. Before testing, the students were given written material and a ten-minute lecture describing both approaches. Seventeen students performed 34 cutdowns; nine students attempted the cephalic cutdown followed by the saphenous cutdown; the remaining eight used the reverse order. The mean time (+/- SD) to isolation of the cephalic vein was 85 +/- 70 seconds; for the saphenous vein, mean time was 70 +/- 89 seconds (P = NS). There was one failure (inability to isolate the vein within five minutes) in 17 attempts at the cephalic vein and two failures in 17 attempts at the saphenous (P = NS). There were no complications (nerve, artery, or tendon injury) with either technique. The mean external vein diameter (+/- SD) of the cephalic vein and the saphenous vein were 3.2 +/- 1.0 mm and 3.6 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively (P = NS). We conclude that relatively inexperienced providers can learn to perform the cephalic vein cutdown at the wrist on fresh cadavers with similar speed and success as that for the saphenous vein cutdown at the ankle. Cutdown at this site may provide a useful alternative to the saphenous cutdown in certain clinical situations.