CEA monitoring among patients in multi-institutional adjuvant G.I. therapy protocols

Aberrant protein glycosylation: Implications on diagnosis and Immunotherapy

Glycosylation-mediated post-translational modification is critical for regulating many fundamental processes like cell division, differentiation, immune response, and cell-to-cell interaction. Alterations in the N-linked or O-linked glycosylation pattern of regulatory proteins like transcription factors or cellular receptors lead to many diseases, including cancer. These alterations give rise to micro- and macro-heterogeneity in tumor cells. Here, we review the role of O- and N-linked glycosylation and its regulatory function in autoimmunity and aberrant glycosylation in cancer. The change in cellular glycome could result from a change in the expression of glycosidases or glycosyltransferases like N-acetyl-glucosaminyl transferase V, FUT8, ST6Gal-I, DPAGT1, etc., impact the glycosylation of target proteins leading to transformation. Moreover, the mutations in glycogenes affect glycosylation patterns on immune cells leading to other related manifestations like pro- or anti-inflammatory effects. In recent years, understanding the glycome to cancer indicates that it can be utilized for both diagnosis/prognosis as well as immunotherapy. Studies involving mass spectrometry of proteome, site- and structure-specific glycoproteomics, or transcriptomics/genomics of patient samples and cancer models revealed the importance of glycosylation homeostasis in cancer biology. The development of emerging technologies, such as the lectin microarray, has facilitated research on the structure and function of glycans and glycosylation. Newly developed devices allow for high-throughput, high-speed, and precise research on aberrant glycosylation. This paper also discusses emerging technologies and clinical applications of glycosylation.

Type IV Collagen in Human Colorectal Liver Metastases—Cellular Origin and a Circulating Biomarker

Simple Summary

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) can be cured through surgery if metastases are detected early in disease progression. Today, CLM diagnosis relies heavily on diagnostic imaging, and cheap, non-invasive, and efficiently measurable biomarkers are needed. Circulating type IV collagen (COL IV) is a potential biomarker for detecting CLM. Patients with CLM show elevated circulating levels of COL IV and increased tissue expression of COL IV in CLM tissue, which could result from enhanced production and degradation of COL IV. This study aimed to establish the cellular source behind enhanced COL IV levels, which is helpful in the evaluation of the biomarker potential of COL IV. We show that fibroblasts express COL IV both in vitro and in the stromal tissue of CLM. We also found that CLM tissue expresses COL IV-degrading proteases. Lastly, CLM patients have higher circulating COL IV levels than healthy controls.

Abstract

Circulating type IV collagen (cCOL IV) is a potential biomarker for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) who present with elevated levels of COL IV in both CLM tissue and circulation. This study aimed to establish the cellular origin of elevated levels of COL IV and analyze circulating COL IV in CLM patients. The cellular source was established through in situ hybridization, immunohistochemical staining, and morphological evaluation. Cellular expression in vitro was assessed by immunofluorescence. Tissue expression of COL IV-degrading matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)-2, -7, -9, and -13 was studied with immunohistochemical staining. Plasma levels of COL IV in CLM patients and healthy controls were analyzed with ELISA. This study shows that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) express COL IV in the stroma of CLM and that COL IV is expressed in vitro by fibroblasts but not by tumor cells. MMP-2, -7, -9, and -13 are expressed in CLM tissue, mainly by hepatocytes and immune cells, and circulating COL IV is significantly elevated in CLM patients compared with healthy controls. Our study shows that stromal cells, not tumor cells, produce COL IV in CLM, and that circulating COL IV is elevated in patients with CLM.

Clinical Significance of Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Within the Normal Range in Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Resection

BACKGROUND

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a widely used tumor marker in colorectal cancer (CRC), but within normal range of preoperative CEA levels the clinical significance of CEA is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of CEA within the normal range as a prognosticator of non-metastatic CRC.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 2021 CRC patients with normal preoperative CEA who underwent elective curative surgery (discovery group). We determined the optimal cut-off value for disease-free survival (DFS) discrimination using the Contal and O'Quigley method. We also assessed the prognostic significance of the cut-off value in a prospective cohort of 171 stage III colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (validation group).

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off CEA value was 2.1 ng/mL in the discovery group. The DFS rates were significantly poorer in patients with high-normal preoperative CEA levels (2.1-5.0 ng/mL) than in those with low-normal CEA levels (< 2.1 ng/mL) in both groups. A high-normal CEA level was an independent risk factor for DFS in both groups, and was associated with inferior DFS in patients with stage II and III disease and in never or former smokers. The correlation between DFS and CEA levels was more distinct in left-sided colon and rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-normal preoperative CEA level (≥ 2.1 ng/mL), even within the normal range, was an independent prognosticator for poor DFS in CRC. The usefulness of CEA was influenced by smoking status and tumor location in addition to tumor stage.

Prognostic impact of preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized carcinoembryonic antigen levels following curative resection of stage I-III rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative and early postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are known prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Recently, a large-scale study on colon cancer revealed that "preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized CEA levels" is not an indicator of poor prognosis. However, whether this hold true in rectal cancer patients is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized CEA levels in rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection.

METHODS

Subjects were consecutive stage I-III rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection without preoperative treatment at National Cancer Center Hospital between 2000 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) and the hazard function of recurrence or death were analyzed according to the CEA levels, as follows: normal preoperative CEA (normal group), preoperatively elevated but postoperatively normalized CEA (normalized group), and preoperatively and postoperatively elevated CEA (elevated group).

RESULTS

The normalized group (n =235) had worse OS (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.04; P = .0142) compared to the normal group (n = 1208), and better OS compared to the elevated group (n = 47) (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.91; P = .0208). The elevated group had the highest and earliest peak in hazard function, followed by the normalized group and the normal group, with median times to recurrence of 8.8, 15.5, and 18.5 months, respectively (P = .0223).

CONCLUSIONS

Prognosis after resection of rectal cancer was worse in patients with preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized CEA compared to those with normal preoperative CEA. Patients with elevated preoperative CEA might require intensive follow-up even if levels normalize after resection, especially in earlier periods, for early detection of recurrence.

Glycosylation in health and disease

The glycome describes the complete repertoire of glycoconjugates composed of carbohydrate chains, or glycans, that are covalently linked to lipid or protein molecules. Glycoconjugates are formed through a process called glycosylation and can differ in their glycan sequences, the connections between them and their length. Glycoconjugate synthesis is a dynamic process that depends on the local milieu of enzymes, sugar precursors and organelle structures as well as the cell types involved and cellular signals. Studies of rare genetic disorders that affect glycosylation first highlighted the biological importance of the glycome, and technological advances have improved our understanding of its heterogeneity and complexity. Researchers can now routinely assess how the secreted and cell-surface glycomes reflect overall cellular status in health and disease. In fact, changes in glycosylation can modulate inflammatory responses, enable viral immune escape, promote cancer cell metastasis or regulate apoptosis; the composition of the glycome also affects kidney function in health and disease. New insights into the structure and function of the glycome can now be applied to therapy development and could improve our ability to fine-tune immunological responses and inflammation, optimize the performance of therapeutic antibodies and boost immune responses to cancer. These examples illustrate the potential of the emerging field of 'glycomedicine'.

A novel therapeutic strategy of personalized medicine based on anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Achieving tumor shrinkage may be a clinically relevant improvement in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study attempted to evaluate early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and deepness of response over 6-8 courses of therapy, which were assessed previously in first-line trials of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies. A total of 37 patients with mCRC that was considered unresectable or borderline resectable were enrolled in the study. Patients exhibited the wild-type RAS gene, and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies were used as the first-line treatment in the Department of Surgical Oncology at Gifu University School of Medicine (Gifu, Japan) between January 2010 and March 2017. Tumor shrinkage and other characteristics were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) classifications (version 1.1). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was >60.0% for all cases (n=37). The mean tumor shrinkage rate in the right side of the colon according to the RECIST classifications was -11.1%, whereas that for CRC on the left side showed a statistically significant difference at -54.0% (P=0.042). In addition, the rates of OS for stable disease + progressive disease compared with partial response + complete response, and those of OS for conversion therapy compared with non-conversion therapy were significantly different (both P<0.001). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was suggested to be a possible predictive factor for convalescence due to the 50% drop in its value after the 6-8 courses of therapy. Overall, the predictive performance of ETS with respect to PFS and OS is at least as good as the standard RECIST response, with the advantage of an earlier assessment, and this may improve convalescence, with CEA as a marker in support of ETS over a clinical treatment course. In RAS wild-type patients, it is important to evaluate the rate of tumor shrinkage from the beginning of the first-line treatment until 6-8 courses of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies have been administered.

Potential for Artifacts in Monitoring for the Detection of Tumor Associated Antigens (TAG-72 and CEA) in Serum from Patients Undergoing MAb-based Diagnostic and Therapeutic Protocols

The administration of murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) induces, in many patients, an immunological response represented by the development of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA). HAMA have been previously shown to interfere in some assays for the detection of CEA, as well as other non tumor related analytes. The present study was performed to determine whether the CA 72-4 assay is affected by the presence of HAMA, and to establish conditions capable of overcoming this artifact. Serum samples obtained from 8/9 patients entered into a therapeutic protocol using 131I-labeled MAb B72.3 showed the development of apparently high levels of TAG-72 during the clinical follow-up concurrent with the appearance of elevated titers of HAMA. Heat treatment at 90°C at pH 5.0 sodium acetate, previously reported as a method of abolishing HAMA interference without affecting CEA levels, resulted in a considerable loss of detectable TAG-72. However, treatment of these samples at 90°C in pH 6.5 Bis Tris abolished the artifact due to HAMA and resulted in the reversion of reported TAG-72 levels to those observed prior to any MAb administration.

As the use of murine M Abs, for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications continues to expand, the identification of this artifactual increase in reported antigen levels due to the development of HAMA has become an important factor in the use of tumor markers, e.g. TAG-72 and CEA, in the follow-up of carcinoma patients.

Preoperative CEA and TAG-72 Serum Levels as Prognostic Indicators in Resectable Gastric Carcinoma

We evaluated in 74 patients with resectable primary gastric carcinoma, the prognostic value of the preoperative circulating serum levels of CEA and TAG-72. Serum levels of CEA were above the cutoff level of 6 ng/ml in 18.9% of patients; TAG-72 levels were higher than 6 U/ml in 31% of patients. Pretreatment mean CEA levels were significantly lower (p<0.01) in patients with stage I tumors (2.9 ± 0.3 ng/ml) than in those with more advanced tumors (stage II: 14.5 ± 6.8 ng/ml; stage HI-TV: 6.8 ± 1.5 ng/ml). Similarly, significant differences in mean TAG-72 serum levels were found between stage I (3.5 ± 1.8 U/ml) and stage II and stage III-IV (30.4 ± 20.7 U/ml and 26.1 ± 9.7 U/ml, respectively) (p<0.05). In addition, TAG-72 levels were also higher in poorly differentiated and moderately differentiated tumors (38.5 ± 20.1 U/ml and 23.1 ± 9.4 U/ml, respectively) than in well differentiated tumors (4.4 ± 0.9 U/ml) (p<0.05). The results further indicated that high preoperative serum levels of CEA predicted shorter relapse-free survival duration (p<0.01), and that high TAG-72 levels were associated with shorter relapse-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0005, respectively). In addition, separate Cox multivariate analysis showed that preoperative TAG-72 was, after stage, the strongest factor to predict both relapse-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.005, respectively) in patients with gastric cancer.

Predictive Value of CEA for Survival in Stage I Rectal Cancer: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess whether preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level is an independent predictor of overall- and cancer-specific survival in stage I rectal cancer.

METHODS

Stage I rectal cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2011. The impact of an elevated preoperative CEA level (C1-stage) compared with a normal CEA level (C0-stage) on overall and cancer-specific survival was assessed using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models and propensity score methods.

RESULTS

Overall, 1932 stage I rectal cancer patients were included, of which 328 (17 %) patients had C1-stage. The 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival for patients with C0-stage were 85.7 % (95 % CI 83.2-88.2 %) and 94.7 % (95 % CI 93.1-96.3 %), versus 76.8 % (95 % CI 70.9-83.1 %) and 88.1 % (95 % CI 83.3-93.2 %) for patients with C1-stage (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). The negative impact of C1-stage on overall and cancer-specific survival was confirmed by risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57, 95 % CI = 1.15-2.16, P = 0.007 and 2.04, 95 % CI = 1.25-3.33, P = 0.006), and after propensity score matching (overall survival [OS]: HR = 1.46, 95 % CI = 1.02-2.08, P = 0.044 and cancer-specific survival [CSS]: HR = 3.28, 95 % CI = 1.78-6.03, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This is the first population-based investigation of a large cohort of exclusively stage I rectal cancer patients providing compelling evidence that elevated preoperative CEA level is a strong predictor of worse overall and cancer-specific survival.

The diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen to detect colorectal cancer recurrence - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) has been used as a tumor marker in the follow-up of colorectal cancer for more than 40 years. Controversy exists regarding its diagnostic applicability due to a relatively low sensitivity and a questionable effect on mortality. The aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEA in detecting recurrence after intended curative surgery for primary colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, and articles were chosen based on predefined inclusion criteria. Reference lists from included articles were manually searched for additional publications of relevance.

RESULTS

Forty-two original studies with generally representative populations and long follow-up were included. Data were reported on outcomes from 9,834 CEA tests during follow-up. Reporting on the reference standards used was not optimal. Sensitivity of CEA ranged from 17.4 % to 100 %, specificity ranged from 66.1 % to 98.4 %, positive predictive value ranged from 45.8 % to 95.2% and negative predictive value ranged from 74.5 % to 100 %.

CONCLUSION

Results point toward a sensitivity of CEA ranging between 50 % and 80 %, and a specificity and negative predictive value above 80 %. Results on positive predictive value showed low reliability. Overall, CEA did not effectively detect treatable recurrences at an early stage, and a clinically relevant effect on patient mortality remains to be proven.

Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Testing for carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in the blood is a recommended part of follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer following primary curative treatment. There is substantial clinical variation in the cut-off level applied to trigger further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of different blood CEA levels in identifying people with colorectal cancer recurrence in order to inform clinical practice.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted all searches to January 29 2014. We applied no language limits to the searches, and translated non-English manuscripts. We searched for relevant reviews in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDION and DARE databases. We searched for primary studies (including conference abstracts) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Science Citation Index & Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science. We identified ongoing studies by searching WHO ICTRP and the ASCO meeting library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy studies, cohort studies, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of post-resection colorectal cancer follow-up that compared CEA to a reference standard. We included studies only if we could extract 2 x 2 accuracy data. We excluded case-control studies, as the ratio of cases to controls is determined by the study design, making the data unsuitable for assessing test accuracy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (BDN, IP) assessed the quality of all articles independently, discussing any disagreements. Where we could not reach consensus, a third author (BS) acted as moderator. We assessed methodological quality against QUADAS-2 criteria. We extracted binary diagnostic accuracy data from all included studies as 2 x 2 tables. We conducted a bivariate meta-analysis. We used the xtmelogit command in Stata to produce the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and we also produced hierarchical summary ROC plots.

MAIN RESULTS

In the 52 included studies, sensitivity ranged from 41% to 97% and specificity from 52% to 100%. In the seven studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 2.5 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78% to 86%) and pooled specificity 80% (95% CI 59% to 92%). In the 23 studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 5 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 64% to 76%) and pooled specificity 88% (95% CI 84% to 92%). In the seven studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 10 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 68% (95% CI 53% to 79%) and pooled specificity 97% (95% CI 90% to 99%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CEA is insufficiently sensitive to be used alone, even with a low threshold. It is therefore essential to augment CEA monitoring with another diagnostic modality in order to avoid missed cases. Trying to improve sensitivity by adopting a low threshold is a poor strategy because of the high numbers of false alarms generated. We therefore recommend monitoring for colorectal cancer recurrence with more than one diagnostic modality but applying the highest CEA cut-off assessed (10 µg/L).

Potential Prognostic Impact of Baseline CEA Level and Surgery of Primary Tumor Among Patients with Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Large Population Based Study

Prognostic role of surgical resection of the primary tumor and baseline CEA among patients with synchronous stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) remains an area of debate. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic value of baseline CEA and surgical resection of the primary among patients with synchronous stage IV CRC in the era of modern chemotherapy and biologic therapy. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registry was searched to identify patients with synchronous stage IV CRC diagnosed between 2004 and 2009. Colorectal-cancer-specific survival (CCS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Cox models were fitted to assess the multivariable relationship of various patient and tumor characteristics and CCS. Three hundred thirty-three thousand, three hundred ninety nine patients were identified in the SEER registry. Median CCS among patients with their primary tumor removed was 21 M vs. 7 M (primary intact) respectively (p < 0.001). Median CCS among patients who had an elevated vs. non-elevated baseline CEA level was 14 M vs. 24 M respectively (p < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, patients with an elevated baseline CEA had a 56 % increased risk of death from CRC compared to those with a non-elevated CEA level (HR = 1.56, 95%CI 1.47-1.65, p < 0.0001). Similarly patients who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor had a 33 % decreased risk of death from CRC compared to those who did not (HR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.54-0.69, p < 0.0001). In our review of this large population SEER based study, an elevated baseline CEA level and surgical resection of the primary tumor among patients with synchronous stage IV CRC appeared to impact survival outcomes. Prospective validation of these results in a surgically unresectable patient population will be required.

Factors predicting long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients with a normal preoperative serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine which clinicopathological factors influenced the long-term survival after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer patients with a normal preoperative serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

METHODS

A total of 1,732 patients who underwent curative surgery for primary nonmetastatic colorectal cancers from 1997 to 2009 were analyzed. Of these patients, 1,128 (65.1 %) had normal level of preoperative CEA (<5 ng/mL). The predicting factors for survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

When the serum CEA cutoff value was set at 2.4 ng/mL (median value), the high CEA groups displayed a higher percentage of older patients, males, large-diameter tumors, advanced T and N categories, and positive perineural invasion, compared to the low CEA groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, T category, N category, number of lymph nodes retrieved, operative method, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, postoperative chemotherapy, and preoperative serum CEA level ≥ 2.4 ng/mL were independent predictors for 5-year overall survival, while tumor location, tumor size, T category, N category, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion were independent predictors for 5-year disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if patients with colorectal cancer have a normal preoperative CEA before surgery, CEA may be useful for prognostic stratification using 2.4 ng/mL as the cutoff.

Carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 are prognostic predictors of colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastasis

No evidence currently exists to demonstrate the prognostic value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the correlation between serum CEA and CA19-9 levels and overall survival in patients with unresectable CRLM. The study involved 40 patients who were diagnosed with unresectable CRLM between March 2000 and August 2010 at Jikei University Hospital, Japan. We retrospectively investigated the correlation between patient characteristics, including serum CEA and CA19-9 levels, and overall survival using univariate and multivariate analyses. In the univariate analysis, the absence of primary tumor resection (p=0.0161), the absence of systemic chemotherapy (p=0.0119), serum CEA ≥100 ng/ml (p=0.0148) and CA19-9 ≥100 U/ml (p<0.0001) were significant predictors of poor survival. In the multivariate analysis, the absence of systemic chemotherapy (p=0.0356), serum CEA ≥100 ng/ml (p=0.0079) and CA19-9 ≥100 U/ml (p=0.0002) were independent predictors. Serum CEA and CA19-9 levels are therefore independent prognostic predictors of survival in patients with unresectable CRLM.

The Role of High Frequency Dynamic Threshold (HiDT) Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Measurements in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: A (Revisited) Hypothesis Paper

Following curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), 30% to 50% of patients will develop recurrent disease. For CRC there are several lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that early detection of metachronous disease offers a second opportunity for cure. This paper revisits the potential role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in follow-up. A comprehensive review of the literature (1978–2008) demonstrates that the initial promise of serum CEA as an effective surveillance tool has been tarnished through perpetuation of poorly designed studies. Specific limitations included: testing CEA as only an ‘add-on’ diagnostic tool; lack of standardization of threshold values; use of static thresholds; too low measurement frequency. Major changes in localizing imaging techniques and treatment of metastatic CRC further cause a decrease of clinical applicability of past trial outcomes. In 1982, Staab hypothesized that the optimal benefit of serum CEA as a surveillance tool is through high-frequency triage using a dynamic threshold (HiDT). Evidence supporting this hypothesis was found in the biochemical characteristics of serum CEA and retrospective studies showing the superior predictive value of a dynamic threshold. A multi-centred randomized phase III study optimizing the usage of HiDT against resectability of recurrent disease is commencing recruitment in the Netherlands.

C-stage in colon cancer: implications of carcinoembryonic antigen biomarker in staging, prognosis, and management

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has proposed the inclusion of pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (C-stage) into the conventional TNM staging system of colon cancer. We assessed the prognosis of various stages of colon cancer after such an inclusion.

METHODS

Data for all patients (N = 17 910) diagnosed with colonic adenocarcinoma (AJCC stages I, IIA, IIB, IIC, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV, based on TNM staging system) between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, with a median follow-up of 27 months (range 0-35 months), were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. C-stage (C0-stage = normal CEA level; C1-stage = elevated CEA level) was assigned to all patients with available CEA information (n = 9083). Multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent factors associated with prognosis. Prognosis of overall stages (AJCC stages I-IV and C0 or C1) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

C1-stage was independently associated with a 60% increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio of death = 1.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.46 to 1.76, P < .001). Overall survival was decreased in patients with C1-stage cancer compared with C0-stage cancer of the respective overall stages (P < .05). Similarly, decreased overall survival was noted in patients with stage I C1 cancer compared with stage IIA C0 or stage IIIA C0 cancer (P < .001), in patients with stage IIA C1 cancer compared with stage IIIA C0 (P < .001), and in patients with stage IIB C1 or stage IIC C1 cancer compared with stage IIIB C0 cancer (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

C-stage was an independent prognostic factor for colon cancer. The results support routine preoperative CEA testing and C-staging upon diagnosis of colon cancer and the inclusion of C-stage in the conventional TNM staging of colon cancer.

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an independent prognostic factor in potentially curative colon cancer

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the prognostic value of the preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed 474 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for nonmetastatic colon cancer. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the preoperative serum CEA level: low CEA (<5 ng/ml) and high CEA (>or=5 ng/ml) groups.

RESULTS

During the median 45-month follow-up period, the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients with a low CEA level were 81.7% and 82.4%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the rates for those with a high CEA level (69.9%; P = 0.011 and 70.6%; P = 0.002, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a preoperative serum CEA level was a significant independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (P = 0.021) and disease-free survival (P = 0.026). Both the overall and disease-free survival rates in patients with stage II tumors differed significantly between the low and high CEA groups, whereas the rates did not different between those with stage I and III tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative serum CEA is a reliable predictor of recurrence and survival after curative surgery in patients with colon cancer, particularly in those classified as having stage II disease.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

CEA is a complex glycoprotein produced by 90% of colorectal cancers and contributes to the malignant characteristics of a tumor. It can be measured in serum quantitatively, and its level in plasma can be useful as a marker of disease. Because of its lack of sensitivity in the early stages of colorectal cancer, CEA measurement is an unsuitable modality for population screening. An elevated preoperative CEA is a poor prognostic sign and correlates with reduced overall survival after surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma. A failure of the CEA to return to normal levels after surgical resection is indicative of inadequate resection of occult systemic disease. Frequent monitoring of CEA postoperatively may allow identification of patients with metastatic disease for whom surgical resection or other localized therapy might be potentially beneficial. To identify this group, serial CEA measurement appears to be more effective than clinical evaluation or any other diagnostic modality, although its sensitivity for detecting recurrent disease is not as high for locoregional or pulmonary metastases as it is for liver metastases. Several studies have shown that a small percentage of patients followed postoperatively with CEA monitoring and who undergo CEA-directed salvage surgery for metastatic disease will be alive and disease-free 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, CEA levels after salvage surgery do appear to predict survival in patients undergoing resection of liver or pulmonary metastases. However, several authors argue that CEA surveillance is not cost-effective in terms of lives saved. In support of this argument, there is no clear difference in survival after resection of metastatic disease with curative intent between patients in whom the second-look surgery was performed on the basis of elevated CEA levels and those with other laboratory or imaging abnormalities. There is also no clear consensus on the frequency or duration of CEA monitoring, although the ASCO guidelines currently recommend every 2-3 months for at least 2 years after diagnosis. In the follow-up of patients undergoing palliative therapy, the CEA level correlates well with response, and CEA is indicative of not only response but may also identify patients with stable disease for whom there is also a demonstrated benefit in survival and symptom relief with combination chemotherapy. More recently, scintigraphic imaging after administration of radiolabeled antibodies afforded an important radionuclide technique that adds clinically significant information in assessing the extent and location of disease in patients with colorectal cancer above and beyond or complementary to conventional imaging modalities. Immunotherapy based on CEA is a rapidly advancing area of clinical research demonstrating antibody and T-cell responses.

Local recurrence after curative resection in patients with colon and rectal cancers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There are a range of rates and a number of prognostic factors associated with the local recurrence of colorectal cancer after curative resection. The aim of this study was to identify the potential prognostic factors of local recurrence in patients with colon and rectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 1,838 patients who underwent curative resection of non-metastatic colorectal cancer was conducted. The patients were treated between 1994 and 2004, and had a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

There were 994 patients with colon cancer and 844 patients with rectal cancer. The median duration of follow-up was 60.9 +/- 24.5 months. With respect to colon cancer, the local recurrence rate was 6.1% (61 patients). With respect to rectal cancer, 95 patients had a local recurrence (11.3%), the rate of which was statistically greater than the local recurrence rate for colon cancer (p < 0.001). The overall recurrence rate was 16.4% (301 patients), and the local recurrence rate, with or without systemic metastases, was 8.5% (156 patients). Local recurrences occurred within 2 and 3 years in 59.9% and 82.4% of the patients, respectively. In patients with colon and rectal cancer, the pathologic T stage (p = 0.044 and p = 0.034, respectively), pathologic N stage (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively) were adverse risk factors for local recurrence. The level of the anastomosis from the anal verge was an additional prognostic factor (p = 0.007) in patients with rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Compulsive follow-up care of patients with colon and rectal cancers is needed for 3 years after curative resection, especially in patients who have adverse risk factors for local recurrence.

Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice

OBJECTIVE

Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has been subjected to debate concerning its effectiveness to reduce cancer mortality. Current national and international guidelines advise CEA measurements every 3 months during 3 years after surgery. The common clinical practice and opinion about follow-up for colorectal carcinoma, was evaluated by means of a survey among Dutch general surgeons.

METHOD

A web-based survey of follow-up after treatment of CRC was sent to all registered Dutch general surgeons. A reply from 246 surgeons treating patients for colorectal carcinoma in 105 out of 118 hospitals was received (response rate 91%). Questions related to actual follow-up protocol, opinion about serum CEA monitoring, liver and/or lung metastasectomy, and motivation to participate in a new trial concerning follow-up.

RESULTS

For the majority of surgeons the length of follow-up was influenced by age of the patient (62%) and physical condition (76%) prohibiting hepatic metastasectomy. The generally accepted follow-up protocol consisted of CEA measurements every 3 months in the first year and six-monthly thereafter, and ultrasound examination of the liver every 6 months. Nearly all surgeons (92%) were willing to participate in a new study of follow-up protocol.

CONCLUSION

The adherence to national guidelines for the follow-up of colorectal carcinoma is low. The indistinctness about follow-up after curative treatment of colorectal carcinoma also affects clinical practice. Recent advancements in imaging techniques, liver and lung surgery have changed circumstances, which are not yet anticipated upon in current guidelines. Renewal of follow-up based upon scientific evidence is required.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement during follow-up for rectal carcinoma is useful even if normal levels exist before surgery. A retrospective study of CEA values in the TME trial

BACKGROUND

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a marker in the follow-up after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is often omitted from follow-up despite guideline recommendations. One reason is the assumption that when a normal CEA value exists before curative resection of CRC, it will neither rise during follow-up. This study investigates this relationship.

METHOD

Data were derived from a study initiated to evaluate treatment regimes for rectal carcinoma (Dutch TME trial, n=1861) from which 954 were eligible for analysis. Recurrent disease occurred in 272 of these patients (29.5%). The pre-operative CEA value was compared to CEA values during follow-up, using threshold values of 2.5 and 5.0 ng/ml.

RESULTS

Normal pre-operative CEA values were present in 63% (CEA<5.0) and 39% (CEA<2.5) of patients with recurrent disease. Patients with a normal pre-operative CEA and recurrent disease had elevated CEA values during follow-up in 41% (CEA<5.0), 50% (CEA<2.5) and in 60% with both threshold values when the last measurement was done within 3 months before recurrent disease was diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

A normal pre-operative CEA is common in patients with rectal carcinoma. CEA does rise due to recurrent disease in at least 50% of patients with normal pre-operative values. Serial post-operative CEA testing cannot be discarded based on a normal pre-operative serum CEA.

Comparative analysis of predictive biomarkers for therapeutical strategies in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognostic information regarding the risk of postoperative tumor recurrence defined by a profile of serological, morphological and/or molecular markers can have potential value, particularly for patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage II/III who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 783 patients with CRC (UICC I-III) including a subgroup analysis of 116 subjects was conducted to determine preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and p53 serum levels. In addition, protein and gene expression of p53, CEA, and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) was assessed in the tumors of those patients. The values of all serological, morphological, and molecular parameters were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics for their predictive value of tumor recurrence over a mean follow-up period of 32 +/- 6.2 months.

RESULTS

Serum CEA but not CA 19-9 or p53 was a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival, along with UICC and T/N stage. When comparing elevated CEA, CA 19-9, and p53 serum levels with expression of the markers in the tumors, their overall expression was found to be 61.3% in the serum versus 93.5% in the tumor in analyzed patients (n = 116). In particular, all patients in UICC stages I-III who demonstrated at least three elevated markers (CEA/CA 19-9/p53) in serum and/or in the tumor presented with tumor recurrence/metastases.

CONCLUSION

Overall increased p53, CEA, and CA 19-9 serum levels and their marker expression in the tumor may be used at the time of primary tumor removal for defining patients at risk for tumor recurrence.

Elevated tumour markers prior to complete tumour removal in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei predict early recurrence

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential value of pre-operative CEA, CA 125 and CA 19-9 in identifying Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) patients at risk of recurrence following complete cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

METHOD

Between March 1996 and October 2001, 35 patients, with documented pre-operative tumour marker measurements, underwent complete cytoreduction. Outcome in the 32 survivors was recorded.

RESULTS

Median age was 53 years (range: 32-74). There were 17[53%] females. In 9/32[28%] all tumour markers were normal. The most common abnormality was elevated CEA level in 14/32[44%]. Median follow up was 23 months (range: 11-74). Recurrence was detected in 8/32[25%]. The 2-year recurrence free interval was 53% in those with elevated CEA compared with 94% with normal CEA. The 2-year disease free intervals were 100% in 9 patients with normal preop markers compared with 66% for the group with at least one abnormal marker.

CONCLUSION

PMP patients with elevated CEA, or more than one abnormal serum tumour maker, are at risk of developing recurrent disease.

Is it reasonable to add preoperative serum level of CEA and CA19-9 to staging for colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) are the most common tumor markers for colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of adding them into the current staging system by analyzing their prognostic significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population was patients (n = 574, 67.1 +/- 11.3 years old, 397 males) who received potentially curative resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma (stage I-III) between January 1994 and August 2002, including preoperative measurements of CEA and CA19-9. Clinicopathological characteristics and associated follow-up data were retrospectively collected by reviewing available medical charts. CEA higher or equal to 5 ng/ml was defined as abnormal (CEA+). The CA19-9 level was set at 37 U/ml (CA19-9+). Patients were further divided into four groups (1, 2, 3, 4) according to the results of these two markers (CEA/CA19-9: -/-, -/+, +/-, and +/+). Survival was analyzed for AJCC staging, CEA (+) versus (-), CA19-9 (+) versus (-), and four groups.

RESULTS

CEA and CA19-9 survival curves were not significantly different. However, the combined use of the two markers revealed a significant survival benefit (P = 0.035) of group 1 ("-" for both markers) over 4 ("+" for both) in stage II.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an elevated level of both CEA and CA19-9 in stage II of colorectal cancer have a significantly poorer prognosis than those with normal levels of these markers. We recommend adding both CEA and CA19-9 to the current staging system.

The role of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in management of colorectal cancer

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an important tool in the management of colorectal cancer. Its use as a prognostic indicator in resectable disease remains controversial but may be improved with molecular detection of the antigen. In monitoring patients after resection, CEA can be the first sign of a potentially curable recurrence. It can also be useful in assessing tumor response in patients being treated for metastases without easily measurable disease. CEA alone cannot dictate the type or duration of treatment but may be used in addition to standard monitoring tests.

Should carcinoembryonic antigen be used in the management of patients with colorectal cancer?

The contribution of carcinoembryonic antigen carcinoembryionic antigen for the effective management of colorectal cancer patients remains a controversial issue. The aim of this study is to attempt to get some valid answers to its function in the diagnosis, prognosis, and overall management of colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of colorectal cancer patients managed and prospectively registered by the authors between 1985 and 1998 was performed. Serum carcinoembryionic antigen levels were determined preoperatively in 209 patients with primary colorectal cancer and postoperatively in 196 patients who had undergone curative resection of their tumors, according to a fixed schedule. A maximum value of 5 ng/ml was accepted as being normal. With the exception of endoscopy, all other diagnostic techniques were only used after an abnormal carcinoembryionic antigen result (a raised value found twice consecutively).

RESULTS

carcinoembryionic antigen preoperative values were raised only in 40 percent of patients and were related to disease stage, with the highest values found in patients with Stage IV disease. However, an elevated preoperative carcinoembryionic antigen value had a very marked prognostic importance, with a statistically significant difference in survival curves (Kaplan-Meier); the same was valid for curatively resected patients (Stages I, II, and III) and for Stages II and III patients considered separately. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards technique confirmed these results, showing preoperative carcinoembryionic antigen to have an independent prognostic value, with a relative risk of recurrence of 3.74 for patients with raised preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels. In postoperative follow-up, carcinoembryionic antigen elevation was found to be a very accurate marker of recurrence (sensitivity, 77 percent; specificity, 98 percent), mainly in liver metastasis (sensitivity, 100 percent), and the best marker of asymptomatic recurrence (63 percent of cases). However, carcinoembryionic antigen's impact on overall survival was negligible because of the poor results of surgical treatment of recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative carcinoembryionic antigen is a very important prognostic indicator and should be considered in future trials. Postoperative carcinoembryionic antigen elevation is a very sensitive marker of recurrence and even of asymptomatic recurrence, but its impact on overall survival does not seem to be relevant. Nevertheless, carcinoembryionic antigen should continue to be used in colorectal cancer patients until better methods of diagnosis and treatment of recurrence are developed.

The value of tumor markers in colorectal cancer

Currently CEA is the most accurate tumor marker for colorectal cancer. Preoperative determination of this marker can assist staging, treatment planning and in particular postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer. Postoperative CEA monitoring should be performed every 3 months. Further evaluation for local recurrence or metastatic disease is mandatory if elevated or increasing CEA levels occur after radical surgery. However, present data do not justify using CEA alone for postoperative follow-up and monitoring of adjuvant therapy. Molecular genetic techniques are now increasingly performed to detect genetic alterations that can be used as prognostic markers. In the future, identification and quantification of these genes may even be valuable in defining the susceptibility of healthy individuals for colorectal cancer.

CEA as a prognostic index in colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA, is the tumor marker most used in colorectal patients, principally during follow up after radical surgery. High serum CEA level before surgery is often associated with worse prognosis, in some studies.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels (CEA) and the frequency of recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-three patients with colorectal cancer at Dukes stages A, B or C were evaluated retrospectively. The patients follow up was at least two years or to death. CEA was determined in serum by enzyme immunoassay (Sorin Biomedica), normal value 0.5ng/ml.

RESULTS

Disease recurrence was observed in 32 patients (38.5%), 13 Dukes B and 19 Dukes C. Seventy five per cent of the patients with CEA higher than 10ng/ml relapsed and 80% of the patients without recurrence had normal CEA. Disease recurrence in patients with preoperative elevated CEA occurred during the first year of follow up in 56% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Although the tumor stage is today the most valuable prognostic variable in colorectal cancer, the preoperative CEA value can provide some additional information in the prognosis of the patient.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Adjuvant therapy is clearly of great benefit for certain patients with colorectal carcinoma. Validation of new prognostic markers to further define which patients are at highest risk of recurrence will be important. Future investigation for adjuvant therapy includes incorporation of achievements made in the advanced disease setting, including biochemical modulation of 5-FU, identification of new active agents, and incorporation of immunotherapy strategies into adjuvant treatment programs. Further improvements in the treatment of these patients, even if small, may translate into important benefits, given the large number of patients presenting annually with this common cancer. As our therapeutic options broaden and improve, investigators will need to focus on quality of life and pharmacoeconomic parameters to determine which adjuvant approaches are optimal for the individual patient with colorectal cancer, as well as for society in general.

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts outcomes in node-negative colon cancer patients: a multivariate analysis of 572 patients

BACKGROUND

Although prospective trials have demonstrated that postoperative chemotherapy for node-positive colon cancer patients provides survival benefit, no improvement in survival has been documented for node-negative colon cancer patients. There are, however, a subset of node-negative patients that go on to die of their disease. We hypothesize that this subset of node-negative patients may benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. We analyzed a large cohort of node-negative colon cancer patients from a single institution to determine prognostic factors that predict which patients with node-negative colon cancer might experience recurrence and can benefit from postoperative chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of the prospective database for colorectal cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 1985 and 1993 identified 572 patients who underwent curative resection for node-negative colon cancer (T(1,2,3,4)N0M0). Demographic, serum, and pathologic factors were analyzed for prognostic significance. Survival was calculated by the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by log rank test. Multivariate analysis was calculated by the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 35 months. Factors predictive of survival by univariate analysis include tumor stage, overall stage, and preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) elevation. By multivariate analysis, overall stage and preoperative serum CEA level predicted survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine histologic and demographic factors do not predict outcome in node-negative colon cancer patients. Preoperative CEA and overall stage predict survival by multivariate analysis. Preoperative CEA elevation in node-negative patients identifies a group of patients that has a poor prognosis and defines a subset of patients who may benefit from postoperative chemotherapy.

Value of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in curative surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study is designed to review a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-driven postoperative protocol designed to identify patients suitable for curative reresection when recurrent colorectal cancer is identified.

METHODS

A total of 285 patients who were operated on for colon or rectal carcinoma between 1981 and 1985 were evaluated (with CEA levels) every two months for the first two years, every three months for the third year, every six months for years 4 and 5, and annually thereafter. CEA levels above 5 microg were considered abnormal and were evaluated with diagnostic imaging and/or endoscopy.

RESULTS

Follow-up was available for 280 patients (98.2 percent). Distribution of patients by Astler-Coller was: A, 14 percent; B1, 20 percent; B2, 39 percent; C1, 5 percent; C2, 21 percent. There were 62 of 280 patients (22 percent) who developed elevated CEA levels, with 44 patients who demonstrated clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence. Eleven patients were selected for surgery with curative intent (4 hepatic resections, 1 pulmonary wedge resection, 2 abdominoperineal resections, 2 segmental bowel resections, and 2 cranial metastasectomies). Three of 11 patients (27 percent) benefited and have disease-free survivals greater than 60 months. Of the 223 patients without elevated CEA, 22 (9.9 percent) had recurrent cancer without any survivors. Overall, 3 of 285 patients (1.1 percent) were cured as a result of CEA follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CEA-driven surgery is useful in selected patients and can produce long-term survivors.

Independent prognostic value of preoperative serum markers CA 242, specific tissue polypeptide antigen and human chorionic gonadotrophin beta, but not of carcinoembryonic antigen or tissue polypeptide antigen in colorectal cancer

The prognostic value of preoperative serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 242, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), specific tissue polypeptide antigen (TPS) and human chorionic gonadotrophin beta (hCG beta) in 251 patients with colorectal cancer (39 Dukes' A, 98 Dukes' B, 56 Dukes' C and 58 Dukes' D) was investigated. When using the cut-off levels recommended for diagnostic purposes, there was a significantly longer overall survival in patients with low tumour marker levels compared with patients with elevated serum levels for all the investigated markers. In Dukes' stage B, C and D CA 242 emerged as a significant predictor of survival, whereas TPA, TPS and hCG beta showed a value only in Dukes' D. Unfortunately, no marker provided prognostic information in Dukes' A. In multivariate analysis, entering the tumour markers as continuous variables, Dukes' stage was the strongest prognostic factor, followed by CA 242. TPS, hCG beta and localisation of the tumour were also independent prognostic factors, whereas age, gender, CEA and TPA were not.

Pre-operative serum levels of CA 242 and CEA predict outcome in colorectal cancer

The prognostic value of the preoperative serum levels of CA 242 and CEA in patients with colorectal cancer was investigated. The serum concentrations of CA 242 and CEA were determined from preoperative serum samples of 259 patients with colorectal cancer (39 Dukes' A, 100 Dukes' B, 59 Dukes' C and 61 Dukes' D). Survival data of these patients were obtained to the end of 1993. There was a significantly longer survival in patients with a CA 242 level below 20 U/ml compared with patients with an elevated serum level. A difference was seen in overall survival (P < 0.0001), and in Dukes' B (P = 0.016) and Dukes' D (P = 0.009) stages. In Dukes' A and C colorectal cancer, the difference was not significant (P = 0.67 and P = 0.07, respectively). When 5 ng/ml was used as cut-off value for CEA, there was a significant difference in overall survival (P < 0.0001), but not within the different Dukes' stages. The prognosis was considerably worse in patients with concomitant elevation of CA 242 and CEA, compared with the prognosis of patients with normal levels or only one marker elevated (P < 0.0001). When analysing according to stage, a significant difference was seen in Dukes' B (P = 0.0004) and Dukes' C (P = 0.0007) stages. In a multivariate analysis, CA 242 was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.0001). CEA was also an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.03), but only after exclusion of CA 242. Concomitant rise of CA 242 and CEA was found to be a strong independent prognostic factor (P < 0.0001). This study shows that the pre-operative serum CA 242 level is an independent prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer and that the prognosis of patients having a concomitant pre-operative elevation of CA 242 and CEA is poor.

Sensitivity of monoclonal antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 50, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This study was designed to establish the sensitivity of monoclonal antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA 50), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and the efficacy of the joint determination of several tumor markers, as well as the dynamics of postoperative normalization of each marker in the absence of recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was carried out in 100 patients subjected to surgical resection of colon adenocarcinoma. Serum concentrations of these markers were determined the day before surgery and seven days, two months, and six months after surgery.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate that sensitivity increased as the disease spread and that CA 19-9 was the most sensitive tumor marker. The rate of false negatives was 40 percent for Dukes Stage A lesions, 19 percent for Dukes Stage B, 7 percent for Dukes Stage C, and 0 percent for Dukes Stage D. Determination of two markers (CA 19-9 and CEA) provided the greatest sensitivity in Stages A and D tumors (60 percent and 100 percent, respectively); the incidence did not change when measurements of other antigens were associated. For Stages B and C, determination of at least three markers was necessary, the association of CEA, TPA, and CA 19-9 being that which showed the greatest sensitivity, 78 percent and 91 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It would be advisable to include monoclonal antibody determination of CEA, TPA, and CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, despite the fact that ultimate sensitivity will depend on the degree of tumor extension or on the presence of metastasis.

Advances in the treatment of early- to late-stage colorectal cancer: 20 years of progress

BACKGROUND

Numerous scientific and clinical advances have made significant changes in our understanding of the etiology of colorectal cancer and in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with large bowel malignancy or its precursor lesions.

METHODS

A personal view of 20 years of progress was presented at the Commission on Cancer lecture during the 1993 Clinical Convocation of the American College of Surgeons.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of early bowel cancers, significant benefit from multimodality therapy of more advanced resectable bowel cancers, and better articulated selection criteria in patients with recurrent colorectal cancers are reviewed. Most importantly, both physical and emotional consequences of our therapies are shown to have diminished without sacrificing the ability to cure. Perhaps the next major challenge is for the general surgeon to assume responsibility as the primary medical manager of any patient with gastrointestinal cancer from the time of diagnosis onward.

Optimal follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: what tests and how often?

Patients' benefit from follow-up examinations after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is unproven in spite of numerous different programs' having been designed for that purpose. Unfortunately, no final results from prospective randomized studies have been published yet and no ideal marker for recurrent cancer is available to identify patients in whom new curative treatment may be possible. So far, screening for metachronous neoplasia with intervals of several years may influence survival, whereas benefit from detecting recurrent colorectal cancer may be claimed only by using historical or other inappropriate controls. The tradition of follow-up is expensive and prospective evidence for any cost benefit is needed to justify continuous use of our limited resources in this area of patient care.

Value of carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The practical value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay in the management of colorectal cancer after surgery is controversial. The value of CEA in the management of colorectal cancer was reviewed and discussed to justify the use of CEA assay in the management of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 318 patients who underwent resection by one surgeon (JYW) between 1981 and 1986 and who were followed for a minimum of 5 years or until death.

RESULTS

The incidence of preoperative CEA levels > 5 ng/ml in Dukes Stages A, B, C, and D were 0, 32, 48, and 79 percent, respectively. Five-year survival rates for groups with CEA levels < or = 5 ng/ml and > 5 ng/ml were 85 percent and 55 percent (P < 0.05), respectively, in Dukes Stage B patients and 64 percent and 37 percent (P < 0.05) in Stage C patients. The sensitivity and specificity of postoperative CEA monitoring in detecting recurrent diseases were 66 percent and 94 percent, respectively, for patients with a preoperative CEA value < or = 5 ng/ml and 97 percent and 88 percent for patients with a higher preoperative CEA value.

CONCLUSION

CEA is still the best tumor marker available to be used as an independent prognostic factor and as a monitor for recurrence of disease after primary tumor resection.

Plasma prolactin in patients with colorectal cancer. Value in follow-up and as a prognosticator

BACKGROUND

Preoperative plasma prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were assessed to monitor disease recurrence and to identify low-risk and high-risk patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Prolactin and CEA were estimated by radioimmunoassay method. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and sequentially thereafter from patients with colorectal cancer (N = 114); the samples were compared with samples from age-matched healthy control subjects (smokers and nonsmokers, N = 45). For rest of the analysis, patients with Dukes A disease (N = 7) were not included because of the small number. In monitoring recurrences, the criteria for positive test for the two markers was a continual increase in the marker level after an initial decrease or persistent high level of the marker. These were the indicators of relapse or no response to treatment. To determine the efficacy of the preoperative markers, the patients were grouped according to disease status at the end of 3 years, i.e., patients who had response to the treatment modalities (N = 52) and patients who later had progressive disease (N = 55). To determine the prognostic significance of preoperative marker levels, the patients were divided according to the cutoff levels (upper normal limits); for prolactin the cutoff level was 20.0 ng/ml plasma, and for CEA it was 5.0 ng/ml plasma.

RESULTS

Both of the markers were significantly high in patients with colorectal cancer compared with the markers of their respective control subjects (P < 0.0001). In monitoring disease course, the predictive power of prolactin was 100%, whereas that of CEA was 66%. Prolactin showed a lead time of 2-3 months. Preoperative prolactin levels were significantly higher in patients who later had progressive disease (P < 0.001) than in patients who had response to the treatments. However, such an intergroup variation was not observed for CEA. Patients with preoperative levels of prolactin greater than 20.0 ng/ml had shorter overall survival times than did those with prolactin levels less than 20.0 ng/ml plasma; such a trend was not observed for patients with CEA levels less than 5.0 ng/ml and those with CEA levels greater than 5.0 ng/ml plasma.

CONCLUSION

Prolactin is a better overall marker than is CEA in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer. The authors recommend the use of plasma prolactin levels to help identify low-risk and high-risk patient subgroups so that high-risk patients may be followed up more intensely and treated accordingly. Hyperprolactinemic patients with Dukes B or C disease have shortened survival time.

Standard postoperative monitoring of patients after primary resection of colon and rectum cancer

The goal of monitoring after primary treatment of any solid tumor, including colon and rectum carcinoma, is to help the patient. The general parameters include prevention of secondary tumors or precancers (because most patients with solid tumors are at greater risk than the general population for second tumors of the same histology), the cure of symptomatic or asymptomatic tumor recurrences, and the palliation of symptomatic tumor recurrences. Additional rationale for more stringent follow-up is somewhat dependent upon the venue of patient care, including the necessity for more frequent studies if the patient happens to be in a protocol in which disease-free survival and/or patterns of recurrence are being investigated. Keeping these parameters in mind, most prevalent follow-up plans remain empiric and probably are not justifiable, on the basis of either cost-effective analysis or real benefit to the patient.

Comparative evaluation of serum CA 195 and carcinoembryonic antigen in metastatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a well-described human tumor-associated antigen most useful clinically in colon cancer. However, the clinical usefulness of CEA is limited by the marker's overall poor specificity and low sensitivity in patients with minimal disease. CA 195 is a recently discovered human tumor-associated glycoprotein that can be measured in serum using an immunoradiometric assay. CA 195 is expressed on the membrane of human colon cancer cells and shares an epitope with the Lewis A blood group antigens. The authors initiated a study to compare the clinical utility of serum CA 195 with CEA in patients with advanced cancer. A control population was studied to assess the effects of age, gender, alcohol, and tobacco on the measured levels of serum CA 195.

METHODS

Using a solid-phase two-site immunoradiometric assay, serum CA 195 and CEA levels were measured in 71 control subjects and 167 patients with a prior diagnosis of cancer. The tumor histologic types included breast cancer, 49 patients; colon cancer, 38; prostate cancer, 24; lung cancer, 22; gastrointestinal noncolon cancer, 7; and miscellaneous, 27. Among patients with a history of cancer, 124 (74%) had active metastatic disease, and 43 (26%) were without evidence of active disease. The control population was composed of subjects without a history of malignancy. Clinical data collected from them included age, gender, smoking history, and alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

In this laboratory, the normal ranges established for CA 195 and CEA in the control group were: 0.0-8.3 U/ml and 0.2-4.2 ng/ml, respectively. In the control subjects, the serum CA 195 level, unlike that of CEA, was not affected by age, gender, alcohol consumption, or tobacco use. In the study population, CA 195 had either equivalent or inferior specificity and sensitivity to CEA in all tumor types. A determination of the additive specificity and sensitivity of CA 195 and CEA did not significantly improve its clinical utility compared with CEA alone. However, CA 195 was significantly elevated in three patients with a prior history of colon cancer thought to be without evidence of active disease. Because all three of these patients had a relapse within the next 1-15 months, CA 195 might identify early relapses of colon cancer in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, it was concluded that CA 195 is not superior to CEA as an indicator of disease activity in advanced colon cancer or other solid tumors. However, studies utilizing CA 195 in the detection of early relapses of colon cancer may be warranted. A review of the English literature revealed that CA 195 might be a useful marker in pancreatic cancer.

Recent advances in surgery for colon and rectal cancer

Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for colon and rectal cancer. Over the past several decades, there have been important advances both in the understanding of the biology of colon and rectal cancer and in the preoperative and operative techniques for treating this disease. Although it appears in some studies that we have made a difference in the survival rates in the treatment of colon and rectal cancer, in actual fact, this phenomenon may only be secondary to better staging and, therefore, a greater ability to prognosticate a particular patient's chance of cure. What has been learned in the past 20 to 30 years is that most colon and rectal carcinomas start as polyps of the colon and rectum. Most often, polyps are sporadic, but there are certain high-risk groups that produce polyps and, consequently, colon and rectal cancer at a much higher rate. The goal of a practicing physician is to identify these high-risk individuals and to recommend frequent screenings so as to intervene before a polyp has had a chance to become a deeply invasive cancer. These high-risk groups are best typified by familial adenomatous polyposis, which if left untreated will, in 100% of cases, lead to the death of a patient from colon or rectal cancer. Other diseases that lead to an increase in colon and rectal cancer but may not go through the usual adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence include inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's colitis and ulcerative colitis. Most patients with colorectal carcinoma are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. This phenomenon has led to efforts to screen the general population for polyps and for cancer. Screening techniques such as the detection of occult blood in the stool and endoscopic procedures are currently the most popular. It is unclear at this time exactly what the efficacy of these techniques is in improving the survival of the general population from colorectal carcinoma. The surgical techniques to remove colon and rectal carcinomas have recently expanded to include a more aggressive local excision policy for small tumors of the rectum and the application of laparoscopic techniques, new stapling techniques, and new anastomosing techniques for tumors of the colon and rectum. These techniques have become possible in part through advances in surgical instrumentation and also in part from our increasing understanding of the biology of the disease. Both have allowed for more creative approaches to diagnosing and treating colon and rectal cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Carcinoembryonic antigen levels of peripheral and draining venous blood in patients with colorectal cancer. Correlation with survival

Correlations between preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of peripheral (p-CEA) and draining blood (d-CEA), the CEA gradient between d-CEA and p-CEA (d-p CEA gradient) levels, and survival after resection of cancer lesions were examined in 94 patients with colorectal cancer. Survival rates of patients with normal p-CEA and d-CEA levels and d-p CEA gradient levels (less than 5 ng/ml) were significantly better than those of patients with abnormal levels (greater than or equal to 5 ng/ml), and the 5-year survival rates were, respectively, 62%, 69%, and 72% in the former and 42%, 41%, and 35% in the latter. The differences in the 5-year survival rates between patients with normal and abnormal d-p CEA gradient, d-CEA, and p-CEA levels were 37%, 28%, and 20%, respectively. Furthermore, the positive rates of d-CEA levels (64%) and d-p CEA gradient levels (48%) were higher than that of p-CEA levels (36%). However, some significant differences in background variables also were found between the respective groups of patients with normal and abnormal p-CEA and d-CEA levels and d-p CEA gradient levels. These results suggest that patients with poor prognoses are examined more effectively by determining their d-p CEA gradient and d-CEA levels than their p-CEA levels, and that CEA may be expressed as a quantitative sum total of various pathophysiologic variables of patients with colorectal cancer but not as an independent prognostic variable.

Clinical use of tumor markers in oncology

The perfect tumor marker would be one that was produced solely by a tumor and secreted in measurable amounts into body fluids, it should be present only in the presence of cancer, it should identify cancer before it has spread beyond a localized site (i.e., be useful in screening), its quantitative amount in bodily fluids should reflect the bulk of tumor, and the level of the marker should reflect responses to treatment and progressive disease. Unfortunately, no such marker currently exists, although a number of useful but imperfect markers are available. The predominant contemporary markers are discussed here by chemical class, as follows: glycoprotein markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and prostate specific antigen (PSA); mucinous glycoproteins, including CA 15-3, CA 19-9, mucinous-like cancer antigen and associated antigens, and CA 125; enzymes, including prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP); hormones and related endocrine molecules, including calcitonin, thyroglobulin, and catecholamines; and, molecules of the immune system, including immunoglobulins and beta-2-microglobulin. The biologic properties of each group of tumor markers are discussed, along with our assessment of their role in clinical medicine today.