Penetrating neck wounds. Mandatory versus selective exploration

Diagnosis, management and treatment of neck trauma

Trauma injuries to the neck account for 5-10% of all trauma injuries and carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality, as several vital structures can be damaged. Currently, there are several treatment approaches based on initial management by zones, initial management not based on zones and conservative management of selected patients. The objective of this systematic review is to describe the management of neck trauma.

Imaging assessment of penetrating injury of the neck and face

Background

Penetrating trauma of the neck and face is a frequent presentation to acute emergency, trauma and critical care units. There remains a steady incidence of both gunshot penetrating injury to the neck and face as well as non-missile penetrating injury—largely, but not solely, knife-related. Optimal imaging assessment of such injuries therefore remains an on-going requirement of the general and specialised radiologist.

Methods

The anatomy of the neck and face—in particular, vascular, pharyngo-oesophageal, laryngo-tracheal and neural anatomy—demands a more specialised and selective management plan which incorporates specific imaging techniques.

Results

The current treatment protocol of injuries of the neck and face has seen a radical shift away from expectant surgical exploration in the management of such injuries, largely as a result of advances in the diagnostic capabilities of multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA), which is now the first-line imaging modality of choice in such cases.

Conclusion

This review aims to highlight ballistic considerations, differing imaging modalities, including MDCTA, that might be utilised to assist in the accurate assessment of these injuries as well as the specific radiological features and patterns of specific organ-system injuries that should be considered and communicated to surgical and critical care teams.

Teaching points

• MDCTA is the first-line imaging modality in penetrating trauma of the neck and, often, of the face

• The inherent deformability of a bullet is a significant factor in its tissue-damaging capabilities

• MDCTA can provide accurate assessment of visceral injury of the neck as well as vascular injury

• Penetrating facial trauma warrants radiological assessment of key adjacent anatomical structures

• In-driven fragments of native bone potentiate tissue damage in projectile penetrating facial trauma

Accidental through and through penetrating injury to the neck

We present the case of a 24-year-old driver who died when a metal pole entered the front windshield, traveled through the victim's neck, and then exited via the back windshield. This case illustrated an unusual penetration injury and the importance of a thorough and complete death scene investigation.

Penetrating neck injuries

The modern approach to patients presenting with penetrating injuries to the neck requires the cautious integration of clinical findings and appropriate imaging studies for formulation of an effective, safe, and minimally invasive modality of treatment. The optimal management of these injuries has undergone considerable debate regarding surgical versus nonsurgical treatment approaches. More recent advances in imaging technology continue to evolve, providing more accurate and timely information for the management of these patients. In this article the authors review both historic and recent articles that have formulated the current management of penetrating injuries to the neck.

Management of Penetrating Neck Injuries: A New Paradigm for Civilian Trauma

PURPOSE

Improvements in imaging technology, particularly computed tomographic angiography (CTA), have altered the management of patients with penetrating neck injuries. Although some centers still advocate routine exploration for all zone 2 neck injuries penetrating the platysma, many civilian centers in the United States have adopted a policy of selective exploration based on clinical and radiographic examination. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate our 5-year experience with the management of penetrating neck injuries, to further elucidate the role of CTA in clinical decision-making, and to assess treatment outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients were identified from the Legacy Emanuel Trauma Registry as having sustained penetrating neck injuries from 2000 to 2005. Using data collected from the Trauma Registry, as well as individual chart notes and electronic records, variables were collected and evaluated including age, gender, mechanism of injury, number of associated injuries, and the Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale on admission, initial hematocrit, airway management techniques, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, missed injuries, length of hospital stay, disposition, and outcome. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients met the inclusion criteria, 55 of which had only superficial injuries that did not penetrate the platysma. The primary study group consisted of 65 patients who sustained more significant injuries that violated the platysma including deep, complex, and/or avulsive wounds, vascular injuries, injuries to the aerodigestive tract, musculoskeletal system, cranial nerves, or thyroid gland. The overall mortality rate for the 65 patients with injuries penetrating the platysma was 3.0% (n = 2). Complications occurred in 7 of the surviving 63 patients (10.7%): 2 patients with zone 3 internal carotid artery injuries developed hemispheric ischemic infarcts and hemiplagia; as well as other complications including: infection (n = 2); deep venous thrombosis (n = 1); aspiration pneumonia (n = 1); and hematoma (n = 1). All surviving patients except the 2 stroke patients eventually healed uneventfully without significant functional deficit. The use of CTA as a guide to clinical decision-making led to a significant decrease in the number of neck explorations performed and a virtual elimination of negative neck explorations.

CONCLUSION

The management of stable patients with neck injuries that penetrate the platysma has evolved at our institution into selective surgical intervention based on clinical examination and CTA and has resulted in minimal morbidity and mortality.

Ferimentos cervicais: análise retrospectiva de 191 casos

OBJETIVOS: Analisar a epidemiologia e a conduta nos ferimentos cervicais. MÉTODO: Foram analisados 487.128 prontuários de pacientes que ingressaram no Serviço de Emergência do Hospital Universitário Cajuru no período de 01/1996 a 06/2001. Destes, selecionaram-se 378 pacientes com ferimentos cervicais. Foram excluídos 153 que apresentavam lesões associadas e 14 por óbito no atendimento inicial. O estudo foi feito , assim, em 191 pacientes com lesões cervicais exclusivas. Avaliou-se a localização da ferida, o mecanismo de trauma, o comprometimento do platisma, sinais e sintomas, a hora de admissão e a conduta empregada. RESULTADOS: Cento e sessenta e quatro (86%) pacientes eram masculinos. A média de idade foi de 28 anos (10-72). Noventa (47%) ferimentos foram por arma de fogo (FAF) e 88 (46%) por arma branca (FAB). O principal horário de admissão foi entre 20 e 04 horas. Quanto à localização, 53% das lesões foram à esquerda, 45% à direita e 2% medianos; 36% em zona I, 55% em zona II e 9% em zona III. Em 101 o ferimento penetrou o platisma: cinqüenta e um (50%) apresentaram sinais e sintomas clínicos e receberam conduta operatória. As lesões vasculares foram as mais encontradas (20). Houve 24 (47%) cervicotomias não-terapêuticas. O tratamento conservador foi empregado em 41 (45%) casos de acordo com os exames físico e complementares. CONCLUSÕES: Homens jovens são mais acometidos quanto aos ferimentos cervicais. Estes ocorrem mais freqüentemente na zona II, e a incidência dos FAF e FAB foi equivalente. É adequado um manejo mais seletivo em relação aos ferimentos cervicais, devendo o manejo da zona II adequar-se à disposição de recursos dos serviços de trauma.

Penetrating zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomographic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically significant injury? A prospective blinded study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the utility of dynamic computed tomographic (CT) scanning as a diagnostic tool and adjunct to physical examination in the identification of surgically significant penetrating zone II neck injuries.

METHODS

All patients older than 14 years of age who suffered penetrating zone II neck injuries were eligible for entry into the study protocol at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients that presented with signs of surgically significant injury on physical examination underwent immediate neck exploration. Patients that did not show signs of surgically significant injury were entered into the study protocol and underwent soft tissue dynamic CT scan (1/2-cm cuts, 250-mL oral contrast) of the neck after initial resuscitation. After CT scan, all patients entered into the study protocol underwent esophagography. After completion of radiologic assessment, all study protocol patients underwent surgical exploration of the neck. The patient's surgical team was blinded to results of the CT scan and esophagography before and during surgical exploration of the neck.

RESULTS

During a 42-month period from May 1997 to March 2001, 42 patients were entered into the study protocol. Thirty-six (86%) of the injuries were secondary to stab wounds and the rest were caused by gunshot wounds. Surgical exploration revealed four esophageal injuries, of which two (50%) were missed by CT scan. Esophagography missed the identical esophageal injuries, as did CT scan. Both of the missed esophageal injuries were secondary to stab wounds. Seven internal jugular vein injuries were diagnosed intraoperatively, of which four (57%) were diagnosed by CT scan. During the study period, all patients with carotid artery and tracheal injuries were diagnosed by physical examination and thus underwent immediate surgical exploration without study entry.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic CT scan contributes minimally to the sensitivity of physical examination in the diagnosis of surgically significant penetrating zone II neck injury. Diagnosis of esophageal injuries with dynamic CT scan appears no better than esophagography. CT scan has greater sensitivity than physical examination for the diagnosis of jugular venous injuries; however, the majority of these injuries do not require identification or surgical intervention.

Management of chest injuries--a 5 year retrospective survey

One hundred and eighty one patients with chest injuries (145 with blunt injuries and 36 with penetrating injuries) were managed using a standardized protocol at the JIPMER Hospital between 1990 and 1995. The insertion of an intercostal tube drain, provision of analgesia and oxygen was sufficient in 80 per cent of patients. An operation was required in 30 per cent of those with penetrating injuries but in only 6.2 per cent of those with blunt injuries. Most patients with chest injuries do not require an operation and can be treated adequately at District General Hospitals. Those with penetrating injuries are more likely to need surgery than those with blunt injuries.

Transcervical gunshot injuries

Gunshot injuries across the cervical midline are not addressed in existing trauma algorithms. A retrospective study of 41 patients with transcervical gunshot wounds was undertaken to delineate injury patterns and management principles. Thirty-four of the 41 patients (83%) sustained 52 injuries to major cervical structures. Vascular (22 injuries) and upper airway (13 injuries) structures were most commonly involved. This resulted in presentation with life-threatening problems in 16 patients (39%). The in-hospital mortality was 10%. In 30 of the 36 neck explorations (83%), the findings were positive for injuries to cervical structures. Sixteen bilateral explorations were performed; in each case, cervical injury was observed on at least one side of the neck. These results indicate that transcervical injuries are excellent markers of associated visceral injury. Therefore, a policy of mandatory neck exploration and a particularly "low threshold" for bilateral exploration are the key to managing these injuries.

Management of penetrating neck injuries. The controversy surrounding zone II injuries

Penetrating neck injuries present a difficult challenge in management, given the unique anatomy of the neck. Controversy surrounds the approach to zone II injuries; mandatory versus selective exploration. On the basis of an extensive literature review, the authors conclude that neither approach is obviously superior. A selective approach is safe in the asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable patient, provided that accurate invasive diagnostic means are immediately available. The mandatory approach is safe, reliable, and time tested. The greatest problem appears to be the accuracy of detection of cervical esophageal injuries: Radiologic evaluation may be inaccurate, rigid esophagoscopy carries a risk of perforation, and the injury may easily be overlooked during surgical exploration.

Penetrating neck trauma: a 5-year review of the literature, 1983 to 1988

Penetrating neck trauma remains controversial: some trauma centers continue to pursue a policy of mandatory exploration while others advocate selective exploration. The literature regarding penetrating neck trauma published during the past 5 years is reviewed in this report. The majority of reports support selective exploration, and most civilian centers report a mortality of 3% to 6% regardless of the type of exploration performed. To clarify the rationale behind the selective management of penetrating neck wounds, current data on ballistics, ancillary diagnostic studies, and comparative costs are reviewed. Emergency room management and surgical follow-up, which vary according to the type of missile and the zone of the neck penetrated, are discussed.

Fifteen years' experience with penetrating trauma to the head and neck in children

To determine the extent and consequences of penetrating trauma to the head and neck in children, as well as the safety and efficacy of selective management of penetrating wounds of the face and neck, we reviewed our experience with these injuries since 1970. During this interval, 45 children aged 2 to 17 years were admitted for treatment of 37 missile wounds (MW) and eight stab wounds (SW). Most patients reached the hospital within 30 minutes of injury. The greatest single number of these injuries were due to accidents; violent crimes accounted for the remainder of injuries in which a motive for attack was known. Craniotomy was performed in neurologically viable patients only; neck exploration was reserved for those patients who presented with profuse hemorrhage, an expanding or pulsatile hematoma, respiratory distress, or violation of the esophagus, trachea, or great vessels seen on fluoroscopy, endoscopy, or angiography. Overall survival was 87% (MW 84%, SW 100%). Three of the nonsurvivors presented in extremis with gunshot (GSW) wounds to the head, and died shortly thereafter, while two who presented with similar injuries survived craniotomy but died subsequently from irreversible brain damage; one presented in shock due to massive hemorrhage (internal jugular vein transection flush with the base of the skull) and exsanguinated during attempted repair. Among the 39 survivors, 15 sustained multiple wounds, but only two presented in shock, due in both instances to tension pneumothorax. Soft tissue injuries of the scalp, face, and neck accounted for 36 of the 39 nonfatal wounds; five of these involved major cervical structures, but only four required immediate exploration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)