Controlled open lesser sac drainage for pancreatic abscess

Gastrointestinal Fistulas in Necrotizing Pancreatitis Receiving a Step-Up Approach Incidence, Risk Factors, Outcomes and Treatment

Purpose

Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) complicated by gastrointestinal fistula is challenging and understudied. As the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis changed to a step-up strategy, we attempted to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, clinical outcomes and treatment of gastrointestinal fistulas in patients receiving a step-up approach.

Methods

Clinical data from 1274 patients with NP from 2014-2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors and propensity score matching (PSM) to explore clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal fistulas.

Results

Gastrointestinal fistulas occurred in 8.01% (102/1274) of patients. Of these, 10 were gastric fistulas, 52 were duodenal fistulas, 14 were jejunal or ileal fistulas and 41 were colonic fistulas. Low albumin on admission (OR, 0.936), higher CTSI (OR, 1.143) and invasive intervention prior to diagnosis of gastrointestinal fistula (OR, 5.84) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of gastrointestinal fistula, and early enteral nutrition (OR, 0.191) was a protective factor. Patients who developed a gastrointestinal fistula were in a worse condition on admission and had a poorer clinical outcome (p<0.05). After PSM, both groups of patients had similar baseline information and clinical characteristics at admission. The development of gastrointestinal fistulas resulted in new-onset persistent organ failure, increased open surgery, prolonged parenteral nutrition and hospitalization, but not increased mortality. The majority of patients received only conservative treatment and minimally invasive interventions, with 7 patients (11.3%) receiving surgery for upper gastrointestinal fistulas and 11 patients (26.9%) for colonic fistulas.

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal fistulas occurred in 8.01% of NP patients. Independent risk factors were low albumin, high CTSI and early intervention, while early enteral nutrition was a protective factor. After PSM, gastrointestinal fistulas resulted in an increased proportion of NP patients receiving open surgery and prolonged hospitalization. The majority of patients with gastrointestinal fistulas treated with step-up therapy could avoid surgery.

Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy

INTRODUCTION

This article describes a case series outlining the experience and results of the retroperitoneal minimally invasive pancreatic necrosectomy (MIPN) procedure performed by, or done under the supervision of, a single surgeon.

METHODS

All data of the patients who underwent MIPN from 2006 to 2008 were entered into a prospectively maintained, computerized database.

RESULTS

A total of 93 MIPN procedures were performed on 32 patients. All patients had severe acute pancreatitis. The median number of MIPN procedures per patient was 3. Only 6 patients needed intensive care unit (ICU) admission after MIPN. There were 15 complications, which included bleeding requiring transfusion (n = 3), bowel fistulae (n = 7), thromboembolic events (n = 2) and acute myocardial infarction (n = 3). Four patients died after the procedure (13%); 1 died of ongoing multiorgan failure in spite of the MIPN. Four patients developed pancreatic pseudocysts within the follow-up period of 2 years. Three of these patients required intervention.

CONCLUSION

This case series demonstrates that MIPN can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality and with good end results. The ICU dependency after the procedure is minimal. As seen in this series, multiple MIPNs may be needed to eradicate the necrosis satisfactorily. and IAP.

Acute pancreatitis with an emphasis on infection

Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease that is mild and self-limiting in about 80% of cases. However, severe necrotizing disease still has a mortality of up to 30%. Differentiated multimodal treatment concepts are needed for these patients, including a multidisciplinary team (intensivists, gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons). The primary therapy is supportive. Patients with infected pancreatic necrosis who are septic undergo interventional or surgical treatment, ideally not before the fourth week after onset of symptoms. This article reviews the pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute pancreatitis and describes clinical pathways for diagnosis and management based on the current literature and guidelines.

Acute pancreatitis at the beginning of the 21st century: the state of the art

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory disease of the pancreas which can lead to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality in 20% of patients. Gallstones and alcohol consumption are the most frequent causes of pancreatitis in adults. The treatment of mild acute pancreatitis is conservative and supportive; however severe episodes characterized by necrosis of the pancreatic tissue may require surgical intervention. Advanced understanding of the pathology, and increased interest in assessment of disease severity are the cornerstones of future management strategies of this complex and heterogeneous disease in the 21st century.

Acute pancreatitis at the beginning of the 21st century: The state of the art

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory disease of the pancreas which can lead to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality in 20% of patients. Gallstones and alcohol consumption are the most frequent causes of pancreatitis in adults. The treatment of mild acute pancreatitis is conservative and supportive; however severe episodes characterized by necrosis of the pancreatic tissue may require surgical intervention. Advanced understanding of the pathology, and increased interest in assessment of disease severity are the cornerstones of future management strategies of this complex and heterogeneous disease in the 21st century.

Combined anterior and posterior open treatment in infected pancreatic necrosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of combined anterior and posterior open treatments (lesser sac marsupialization (LSM) + lumbostomy, LSM + L) in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) with a previous experience of isolated LSM and with data in literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients operated on for IPN from 1981 to 2005 were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique used: single LSM (n = 23; period A, 1981-1998) and combined LSM + L (n = 11; period B, 1999-2005).

RESULTS

The postoperative mortality rate was 38.1 (n = 8) and 9% (n = 1) during period A and B, respectively. The most important cause of death was recurrent or persistent sepsis with multiple organ failure. The overall postoperative surgical morbidity was 57 (n = 13) and 27.2% (n = 3) in the two consecutive groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IPN is a challenging condition associated with high mortality mainly because of a persistence of sepsis despite surgery. A comparative analysis of many proposed operative procedures is difficult because of the heterogeneity in the reported series. Open approaches seem to be more effective in controlling local infection and systemic sepsis. Combining open anterior and posterior approaches is in our experience an appropriate surgical treatment in IPN patients.

[Advantages and disadvantages of planned staged relaparotomy using the zipper technique in surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis]

The rationale of surgical intervention during acute necrotizing pancreatitis is to remove necrotic tissue preserving healthy glandular parenchyma and other adjacent structures, thus limiting severe complications. Necrosectomy and debridement are the crucial in surgical management, further treatment of pancreatic bed and peripancreatic tissue are still a matter of debate among pancreatic surgeons. Zipper technique is one of the three recognized methods [table: see text] for the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis. The aim this study was to review the literature data about treatment using this technique, as well to compare the results of treatment with other techniques, in order to present the advantage and disadvantage of zipper technique. The main advantage of this technique is a high level of control of intraabdominal infection and other septic complications associated with necrotizing pancreatitis and its surgical management. Increased risk of development of gastrointestinal and pancreatic fistulas as well of intraabdominal bleeding is probably the main disadvantage. A flexible approach focused on the individual patients is a reasonable solution in the surgical management of the necrotizing pancreatitis.

Outcome of open necrosectomy in acute pancreatitis

Twenty percent of all acute pancreatitis patients present with necrotizing pancreatitis. Infected necrosis is responsible for 80% of deaths in the course of the disease though, thanks to antibiotic prophylaxis, the infection rate is decreasing. When infection occurs, the prognosis is poor, and the need for debridement and drainage of the necrosis is mandatory. The aim of this study was to review the most recent literature in order to present an update of open surgical management of infected necrosis.

Acute pancreatitis and bacterial translocation

Infectious complications are the most frequent and severe complications of acute narcotizing pancreatitis (AP) with a mortality rate up to 80%. Although experimental and clinical studies suggest that the microbiologic source of pancreatic infection could be enteric, information in this regard is scant. This study evaluated bacterial translocation (BT) using mild and severe models of AP. Mild AP was induced by 6-hr continuous intravenous infusion of cerulein, while severe AP was induced by additional infusion of glycodeoxycholic acid into the biliopancreatic duct. BT was evaluated with organ cultures performed when animals were killed (24 hr). To confirm the gastrointestinal origin of the translocating microorganisms, fluorescent microspheres were also given to the animals in drinking water 24 hr before induction of AP. At the time of death beads were counted with a (fluorescence-activated cell sorter) (FACS) in peritoneal lavages and with fluorescent microscopy in frozen sections of the pancreata. Morphology of the distal small bowel showed significant changes in the animals with AP compared to controls, such as reduction of villus high and altered microvasculature. Mild AP induced BT to the pancreas in 100% of the animals, compared to pancreata from control groups. Severe AP induced increased BT to the pancreas. BT to liver and spleen was also significantly increased with AP. The presence of fluorescent microspheres confirmed their enteric derivation. This study provides evidence for the enteric origin of microorganisms responsible for pancreatic infectious complications during AP. The evidence of BT after laparotomy suggests an increased risk of infections with the association of these conditions. This could provide an explanation for the high mortality associated with laparotomy in course of AP.

Management of severe acute pancreatitis with a somatostatin analog in a patient undergoing surgery for dissecting thoracic aneurysm: report of a case

A patient who was admitted to our hospital to undergo surgery for a dissecting thoracic aneurysm suffered preoperatively from severe acute pancreatitis with pancreatic pseudocysts. Computerized tomography (CT) demonstrated the presence of new fluid collection around the cyst with the absence of pancreatic necrosis. He was given a somatostatin analog (sandostatin), which was effective in decreasing the abdominal symptoms, leukocyte counts, and the serum C-reactive/protein level. A CT scan revealed that the pancreatic pseudocyst and peripancreatic fluid collection had disappeared. Although somatostatin has been reported to be ineffective for acute pancreatitis with necrosis, pancreatitis without necrosis may regress after treatment with sandostatin. This is probably due to its suppressive effect on the exocrine function, thus resulting in a decrease of pancreatic juice infiltration.

Management of necrotizing pancreatitis by repeated operative necrosectomy using a zipper technique

METHODS

From 1983 to 1995, 72 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were treated with a general approach involving planned reoperative necrosectomies and interval abdominal wound closure using a zipper.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 25%. Multiple organ failure without sepsis caused early mortality in 3 of 4 patients and sepsis caused late mortality in 11 of the remaining 14. The mean number of reoperative necrosectomies/debridements was 2 (0 to 7). Fistulae developed in 25 patients (35%); 64% were treated conservatively. Recurrent intraabdominal abscesses developed in 9 patients (13%) but were drained percutaneously in 5. Hemorrhage required intervention in 13 patients (18%). Prognostic factors included APACHE-II score on admission < 13 (P = 0.005), absence of postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.01), and peripancreatic tissue necrosis alone (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The zipper approach effectively maximizes the necrosectomy and decreases the incidence of recurrent intraabdominal infection requiring reoperation. APACHE-II score > or = 13, extensive parenchymal necrosis, and postoperative hemorrhage signify worse outcome.

Surgical management of pancreatic necrosis presenting with locoregional complications

BACKGROUND

Local complications of pancreatic necrosis may occur after surgery, but when they occur spontaneously render surgical treatment more hazardous and impair prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out of 83 patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic necrosis from 1988 to 1995, to determine the incidence, type, treatment and outcome of locoregional complications caused by pancreatic necrosis associated with acute pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (20 per cent) were identified to have intra-abdominal complications with pancreatic necrosis either before operation or at the time of surgery. The majority of patients had a delay in intervention (mean 46 days). At presentation ten of the 17 patients had one or more organ system failures. Fourteen patients had gastrointestinal tract involvement, two had involvement of the biliary tract and one patient had a splenic rupture. Six patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pancreatic necrosis, development of locoregional complications is associated with a high mortality rate. The presence of gastrointestinal bleeding, peritonitis, jaundice or pneumoperitoneum in such patients suggests the presence of a complication of the necrotic process and should prompt early intervention. Early referral of patients with severe acute pancreatitis to specialized units may reduce the risk of locoregional complications.

Interventional and surgical treatment of pancreatic abscess

Pancreatic abscess is one of the infectious complications of acute pancreatitis. It is a collection principally containing pus, but it may also contain variable amounts of semisolid necrotic debris. Most of these abscesses evolve from the progressive liquefaction of necrotic pancreatic and peripancreatic tissues, but some arise from infection of peripancreatic fluid or collections elsewhere in the peritoneal cavity. Included also are abscesses found after surgical débridement and drainage of pancreatic necrosis. Although open surgical treatment of infected necrosis is the established treatment of choice, percutaneous drainage of abscesses is successful in some circumstances. We used percutaneous catheter drainage in 39 patients during 1987-1995. Only 9 of 29 (31%) attempts at primary therapy were successful; 2 patients died, and 18 required subsequent surgical drainage. On the other hand, 14 of 14 patients with recurrent or residual abscesses after surgical drainage were successfully drained percutaneously. Percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic abscesses may be useful for initial stabilization of septic patients, drainage of further abscesses after surgical intervention (especially when access for reoperation will be difficult), associated abscesses remote from the pancreas, and selected unilocular collections at a sufficient interval after necrotizing pancreatitis to have allowed essentially complete liquefaction.

Classification and treatment of local septic complications in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

An international symposium on acute pancreatitis recently developed a clinical classification system for severe acute pancreatitis that classifies all local septic complications into three groups: infected necrosis (IN), sterile necrosis (SN), and pancreatic abscess (PA). Despite the appeal of having three distinct, well-defined labels for this complex process, the clinical utility of this schema has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic and therapeutic utility of applying this clinical classification system to a large group of surgical patients with local septic complication from acute pancreatitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 62 patients with complicated pancreatitis, classifying them into IN (n = 20), SN (n = 14), or PA (n = 28) groups. Ranson's score, APACHE II score, and computed tomography grading were calculated within the first 48 hours of admission. Information on patient demographics, etiology of pancreatitis, operative procedures, timing of intervention, bacteriology, blood loss, intensive care unit days, ventilator days, and morbidity and mortality were also accrued and analyzed.

RESULTS

Despite similar demographics and etiology of pancreatitis, patients with necrosis, both IN and SN, were more critically ill than were patients with PA (APACHE II score > 15, 21% versus 0%, respectively), required earlier operative intervention (mean 14 days versus 29 days, P = 0.02), required necrosectomy with drainage (65% versus 4%, P < 0.001) rather than simple drainage (3% versus 86%, P < 0.001), more reoperations (2.3 versus 1.1, P < 0.05), and had a significantly higher mortality rate (35% versus 4%, P < 0.05). In addition, patients with IN required significantly more hospital days, ventilator days, and blood transfusions than either patients with SN or PA (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this classification system allows for the stratification of patients into three distinct groups--infected necrosis, sterile necrosis, and pancreatic abscess--and has both therapeutic and prognostic usefulness.

Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial was undertaken in 102 patients with objective evidence of severe acute pancreatitis to evaluate whether selective decontamination reduces mortality.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Secondary pancreatic infection is the major cause of death in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Controlled clinical trials to study the effect of selective decontamination in such patients are not available.

METHODS

Between April 22, 1990 and April 19, 1993, 102 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were admitted to 16 participating hospitals. Patients were entered into the study if severe acute pancreatitis was indicated, on admission, by multiple laboratory criteria (Imrie score > or = 3) and/or computed tomography criteria (Balthazar grade D or E). Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard treatment (control group) or standard treatment plus selective decontamination (norfloxacin, colistin, amphotericin; selective decontamination group). All patients received full supportive treatment, and surveillance cultures were taken in both groups.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were assigned to the selective decontamination group and 52 were assigned to the control group. There were 18 deaths in the control group (35%), compared with 11 deaths (22%) in the selective decontamination group (adjusted for Imrie score and Balthazar grade: p = 0.048). This difference was mainly caused by a reduction of late mortality (> 2 weeks) due to significant reduction of gram-negative pancreatic infection (p = 0.003). The average number of laparotomies per patient was reduced in patients treated with selective decontamination (p < 0.05). Failure of selective decontamination to prevent secondary gram-negative pancreatic infection with subsequent death was seen in only three patients (6%) and transient gram-negative pancreatic infection was seen in one (2%). In both groups of patients, all gram-negative aerobic pancreatic infection was preceded by colonization of the digestive tract by the same bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of gram-negative colonization of the digestive tract, preventing subsequent pancreatic infection by means of selective decontamination, significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Antimicrobial treatment of pancreatic infection in cats

An investigation examined the efficacy of antibiotics in a novel feline model of pancreatic infection in acute pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis was induced in cats using an established technique. In control animals (no pancreatitis) and cats with pancreatitis, Escherichia coli (10(4) in 0.1 ml) was placed in the pancreatic duct. Reoperation was performed after 24 h in six controls and six cats with pancreatitis. E. coli was cultured from the pancreas in five control animals and five cats with pancreatitis. Reoperation was performed after 1 week in ten controls, in 11 cats with pancreatitis and in nine with pancreatitis that were treated with cefotaxime (50 mg/kg intramuscularly three times daily) started 12 h after the induction of pancreatitis and administration of E. coli. Pancreatic infection developed in eight cats with pancreatitis compared with none of the cefotaxime-treated animals and none of the controls (P < 0.05). Cefotaxime reached bactericidal levels in pancreatic tissue and juice. In conclusion, ductal administration of E. coli caused pancreatic infection only in cats with acute pancreatitis. Early administration of an appropriate antibiotic was effective in treating pancreatic infection in acute pancreatitis.

Pancreatic infection complicating acute pancreatitis

Pancreatic infection is the leading cause of death from acute pancreatitis. Patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis are most at risk. Early computed tomography and percutaneous fine-needle aspiration microbiology of areas of pancreatic necrosis enable early diagnosis. Pancreatic infection should be treated surgically, although sterile necrosis may be managed conservatively. The role of antimicrobial drugs is uncertain.

Prognostic factors in sterile pancreatic necrosis

Although the overall mortality in sterile pancreatic necrosis is low, patients who experience systemic complications may have a higher mortality. To study the impact of systemic complications and other factors on survival, possible prognostic factors were evaluated among 26 patients who experienced at least one systemic complication. Mortality was 38%. Factors that correlated with a fatal outcome were high Ranson's scores during the first 48 hours (P = 0.01), high APACHE-II scores at admission (P = 0.04) and at 48 hours (P = 0.03), shock (P < 0.001), renal insufficiency (P < 0.05), multiple systemic complications (P < 0.001), and high body mass index (P = 0.01). Most systemic complications occurred during the first 2 weeks of illness. Logistic regression analysis showed that shock was the best predictor of a fatal outcome. Patients with favorable prognostic factors survived whether treated medically or surgically, whereas those with unfavorable factors had a fatal outcome whether treated medically or surgically. It is concluded that patients with severe sterile necrosis have a high mortality rate and that shock and other prognostic factors identify which patients are most likely to have a fatal outcome.

Prevention of bacterial infection and sepsis in acute severe pancreatitis

Between 1984 and 1986 six patients with acute respiratory failure (requiring ventilation for at least 3 days) complicating acute pancreatitis were managed on the intensive care unit (median ventilation period 6 days; range 3-41 days). Between 1987 and 1989 nine similar patients were managed (median ventilation period 35 days, range 4-69 days), and a regimen of enteral tobramycin, polymyxin and amphotericin to selectively decontaminate the digestive tract (SDD) was introduced. Five of six patients treated before 1987 had serious infections (three Gram-negative, one fungal), compared with only one of nine patients treated with SDD (P < 0.05). Clinical signs of sepsis were evident for 62% of the pre-SDD period, compared with 39% of the period during SDD therapy (P < 0.001). Systemic antibiotic prescribing was reduced in the SDD group; however, mortality remained unaffected with only two patients surviving pre-SDD and three during SDD treatment. SDD reduces infection rates and sepsis in patients with acute pancreatitis and may help to improve the prognosis of this life-threatening condition.

Management of intra-abdominal sepsis

The management of intra-abdominal sepsis includes drainage of septic foci, debridement of devitalized tissue, and prevention of continuing peritoneal contamination. An algorithm is presented as an aid to the thought process.

Intra-abdominal sepsis: the role of surgery

The role of the surgeon in intra-abdominal sepsis is multifactorial. A comprehensive understanding of the incidence and pathophysiology of diseases which cause intra-abdominal sepsis is the key to the diagnosis and treatment of such ailments. In simplest terms, the aetiology has two basic mechanisms: (a) violation of the 'bug-body barrier' and (b) obstruction to the flow of a body fluid with subsequent bacterial overgrowth. Either of these mechanisms may affect any of the organs within the abdomen, leading to sepsis. The peritoneal cavity is a dynamic structure which responds to insults in certain predictable manners which notify the alert physician that danger is present. Recognition of these signs through history and physical examination are the most important aspects of diagnosis. Confirmation of suspicions can be obtained with radiological modalities, but they are not a substitute for clinical judgement. Treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis should always begin with resuscitation and systemic antibiotics. Alleviation of the septic source is mandatory, and this may be achieved either operatively or non-operatively (i.e. percutaneous or endoscopic procedures). When the patient does not improve after the initial procedure, then a missed focus of infection must be investigated. In some cases, a planned or staged second operation may be needed to further debride necrotic tissue. Antibiotics should be of adequate spectrum and bioavailability to kill the species of bacteria most likely to cause the infection. This regimen may be altered when culture and sensitivity reports are completed. Finally, patients whose immune system function has been altered by disease or treatment must be assumed very ill until proven otherwise. These are general guidelines in the management of patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. Individual cases may necessitate slight modifications, but all require a high level of vigilance and expertise in order to combat a very lethal disease.

Open approach in pancreatic and infected pancreatic necrosis: laparostomies and preplanned revisions

One hundred and two patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated in accordance with a combined regimen of necrosectomy, open drainage by laparostomies, and repeated re-explorations. The severity of pancreatitis was assessed by the APACHE II score (median 15 on admission). Eighty-seven (85%) patients were classified as having infected pancreatic necrosis and only 15 (15%) as having pancreatic necrosis. Overall, 36 (35%) patients died, most of multiple organ failure. Survival was significantly impaired by bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis (p = 0.008), bacteremia (p = 0.0001) and infected bronchial secretions (p = 0.05). The mortality rate was reduced from 53% to 28% by changing the regimen of re-explorations from on demand to regular 48 hour intervals. Despite the fact that open packing was associated with a high frequency of gastrointestinal fistulas (30%), this concept seems to be a successful and recommendable approach in the therapy of pancreatic and infected pancreatic necrosis.

Planned reoperations and open management in critical intra-abdominal infections: prospective experience in 52 cases

Open management and "planned relaparotomies" in the treatment of critical abdominal infections have recently generated interest and hope. Most studies which examine the value of these therapeutic modalities are retrospective and include poorly stratified groups of patients. Since 1985, we have consistently applied these aggressive methods of treatment in all patients presenting with intra-abdominal infections belonging to the following groups: I) diffuse postoperative peritonitis (29 cases); II) diffuse fecal peritonitis (14 cases); and III) infected pancreatic necrosis (9 cases). The overall mortality rate was 44%; it was 55%, 14% and 56%, respectively, in the 3 groups. The abdomen was closed between reoperations in 21 patients who required an average of 1.7 relaparotomies; the mortality in this group was 24%. Thirty-one patients, who required an average of 3.8 relaparotomies, were managed with the open method resulting in a mortality of 58%. Multiple organ failure was the cause of death in 87% of the patients. We conclude that "planned relaparotomies" may have been beneficial in group II. The value of open management in patients belonging to groups I and III remains unproven. The mechanical-surgical answers to severe forms of peritonitis may have reached their limit.

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: management by planned, staged pancreatic necrosectomy/debridement and delayed primary wound closure over drains

We reviewed our recent experience with management of 23 consecutive patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. All patients had documented necrotizing pancreatitis with parenchymal or peripancreatic necrosis. Our method of treatment has evolved from our previous approach of controlled open lesser sac drainage (marsupialization) to staged necrosectomy/debridement with delayed primary closure over drains. With this latter approach, hospital mortality was 4 of 23 patients (17 per cent), but significant morbidity still occurred in 12 of 23 patients (52 per cent). However, recurrent intra-abdominal abscess before discharge occurred in only one patient. We believe that this operative approach toward the severely ill patient with acute necrotizing pancreatitis who requires operative intervention will minimize the occurrence of intra-abdominal sepsis.

Surgical strategies in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis and infection

Controversy still surrounds the management of necrotic and septic complications of acute pancreatitis. A review of the literature of the past decade dealing with the surgical treatment of pancreatic necrosis, pancreatic abscess and infected pancreatic necrosis has been undertaken. Three main patterns of management could be identified: (1) 'conventional treatment', consisting of pancreatic resection or necrosectomy with drainage; (2) 'local lavage', consisting of necrosectomy followed by regional lavage; and (3) 'open management', with resection or necrosectomy followed by planned multiple re-explorations. From this review it appears that local lavage and open management offer better survival prospects than conventional treatment. Open abdomen techniques, however, are associated with an increased risk of complications, such as colonic necrosis, intestinal fistula, and intra-abdominal bleeding. Excellent results can be achieved in specialized centres with any of the three methods, provided adequate debridement and prompt reoperations are undertaken if the septic state persists.

Sequential laparotomy and zipper closure in the management of gross peripancreatic sepsis

Four cases of gross peripancreatic sepsis have been managed with repeated laparotomies and packing of the lesser sac. A zipper was used for abdominal closure in three patients and the abdomen was left open in one. Sequential laparotomy enabled repeated debridement of non-viable pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue and prevented intra-abdominal septic accumulations. An additional benefit of this technique was the frequent detection and correction of clinically unsuspected complications of the septic abdomen.

The role of surgery in the management of acute pancreatitis

Surgical intervention in acute pancreatitis may have varied goals. Early laparotomy may be required for diagnostic purposes. There is, however, no convincing evidence that attempts to reduce the morbidity of severe pancreatitis by early operative pancreatic drainage, early formal pancreatic resection, or early biliary procedures have been effective. In fact, they may be harmful. Peritoneal lavage by catheter induced under local anesthesia may ameliorate early cardiovascular and respiratory complications in some patients. Preliminary experience suggests that early operative debridement of devitalized pancreatic tissue with postoperative lavage may be helpful in selected patients. Patients with infections of devitalized pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue require operative debridement and drainage or packing. Other complications such as colonic necrosis or pseudocysts also require operative treatment. Rarely do patients require operation to relieve protracted pancreatitis. Patients with gallstone-associated pancreatitis should usually undergo surgical correction of their cholelithiasis as soon as their pancreatitis has subsided.

Intestinal fistula complicating necrotizing pancreatitis

Eight of 17 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (47 percent) developed 12 intestinal fistulas. Pancreatitis occurred most often secondary to alcohol abuse, and fistula complicated controlled open drainage of the lesser sac more often than sump or Penrose drainage of the lesser sac. Fistulas appeared more often in patients with two or more drainage operations than in those with a single drainage procedure. Most duodenal fistulas closed with nonoperative therapy, whereas jejunal and colonic fistulas required operative closure. Operative techniques included both simple suture closure and resection with anastomosis. Five patients (29 percent) died. Thus, although frequent debridement and controlled open drainage may reduce the mortality rate of necrotizing pancreatitis, it appears to increase the likelihood of intestinal fistulas, which may require operative treatment.

Debridement and closed cavity irrigation for the treatment of pancreatic necrosis

Pancreatic and peripancreatic debridement combined with a closed cavity system of drainage was used to manage necrotic sequelae of severe acute pancreatitis in 14 patients. Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography, or latterly incremental dynamic computed tomographic angiography, accurately detected and localized necrotic tissue. Operation was delayed where possible to permit demarcation of the necrotic area and the development of a 'capsule' of inflammatory tissue. A retrocolic route of access to the necrotic area was used in nine cases, and purpose-made silicone elastomer tubes with an outside diameter of 20 mm were positioned so that drainage was assisted by gravity when the patient was supine. The cavity was irrigated with saline (initially 2 litres daily), and in the last seven patients Trasylol was included in the irrigation fluid (5 x 10(6) kallidinogenase inactivator (KI) units/litre) for the first postoperative week. Three elderly patients died (mean age 72 years) but all patients aged less than 68 years survived. Planned reoperation was carried out in two patients, but further reoperations were not required in the remaining 11. Drainage tubes were removed when contrast studies showed the cavity to be small and superficial; the median duration of drainage was 28 days. Although sinograms demonstrated fistulae between cavity and small bowel (n = 4) or small bowel and colon (n = 2), no clinical problems resulted and all closed spontaneously. Closed drainage may be as effective as techniques of marsupialization, but avoids the need for frequent relaparotomy.

Colonic complications of severe acute pancreatitis

Colonic complications are rare in acute pancreatitis. Over the last 9 years at St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK, we have managed severe acute pancreatitis by intensive supportive therapy followed by sub-total pancreatic resection and/or debridement in those who fail to improve. Of the 22 patients who have undergone this form of surgery, nine were found to have colonic involvement in the form of either necrosis or perforation. In addition, one patient presenting at West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, UK, had severe acute pancreatitis and almost total colonic necrosis as an unexpected finding at emergency laparotomy. These ten patients comprised seven men and three women of median age 59 years and with a median of four Ranson criteria. In seven patients, colonic involvement was discovered at the time of pancreatic surgery or laparotomy for pancreatitis and in the remainder it presented between 1 and 3 weeks later as either a faecal fistula (n = 2) or persistent abdominal sepsis (n = 1). The ascending colon was involved in one patient, the splenic flexure and descending colon in one, the transverse colon in three, the splenic flexure alone in four, and one patient had almost total colonic involvement. All patients underwent resection of the involved colon and exteriorization with either a proximal colostomy (n = 7) or ileostomy (n = 3) and a distal mucous fistula. Pathological examination of the resected colons revealed a spectrum of changes from pericolitis through to ischaemic necrosis suggesting at least two possible mechanisms. Six patients died from overwhelming sepsis between 1 day and 4 weeks (median 11 days) after colonic resection. Severe acute pancreatitis must be recognized as a cause of colonic ischaemia and necrosis; this complication is associated with a very poor prognosis despite surgical intervention.

Laparostomy in acute pancreatitis

Images

Acute pancreatitis

In order to recognize acute pancreatitis in the setting of the acute abdomen, the surgeon must be thoroughly familiar with the numerous etiologies of the disease. No specific test is available to diagnose acute pancreatitis. CT scanning is arguably the most useful single tool, but surgical judgment is critical. Most cases of acute pancreatitis resolve spontaneously without sequelae, but the spectrum of the disease also includes highly lethal forms associated with a variety of systemic complications. Operative intervention is indicated when other, more rapidly fatal, abdominal processes cannot be reliably excluded and when local complications develop.

Necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage in necrotizing pancreatitis

Necrosectomy with postoperative continuous local lavage was performed in a prospective study involving 95 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. In the same period 567 patients with oedematous-interstitial pancreatitis were treated non-operatively with a hospital mortality rate of 0.7 per cent. In patients with necrotizing pancreatitis the median Ranson criteria score was 4.5 points; operation was required at a median of 7 days after the onset of symptoms because of non-response to conservative treatment. In all, 59 per cent of the patients (56 out of 95) developed extended intrapancreatic parenchymal necrosis, 70 per cent had ascites, and 66 per cent had intra- and extrapancreatic necrosis; 42 per cent of the patients had bacterial infection of the necrotic tissue. For lavage a median of 8 l/24 h of fluid were instilled postoperatively for 25 days (median). The lavage fluid showed high levels of immunoreactive trypsin, phospholipase A2, and endotoxin in the early postoperative period. Hospital mortality rate was 8.4 per cent. Necrosectomy and continuous postoperative lavage can achieve high survival rates in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Postoperative local lavage allows the continuous non-operative evacuation of biologically active compounds and devitalized tissue, and avoids damage to remaining vital exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissue.

Value of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. A prospective study of 202 patients

Two hundred two patients admitted with the clinical suspicion of acute pancreatitis underwent computerized tomography scanning within 36 hours of admission. The diagnostic value of the computerized tomography findings was excellent, with a sensitivity of 92 percent and a specificity of 100 percent. One hundred seventy-six patients with acute pancreatitis defined according to the overall clinical course were included in the prognostic study. The pancreatitis was fatal in 21 patients, severe in 47 patients, and mild in 108 patients. The computerized tomography findings were classified into the following three groups on the basis of the extent of phlegmonous extrapancreatic spread: Group I, no phlegmonous extrapancreatic spread (100 patients, none died); Group II, phlegmonous extrapancreatic spread in one or two areas (28 patients, mortality rate 4 percent); and Group III, phlegmonous extrapancreatic spread in three or more areas (48 patients, mortality rate 42 percent) (p less than 0.0001). The following three scores from prognostic clinical and laboratory data were also obtained: Score 1, zero or one positive sign (82 patients, none died); Score 2, two to four positive signs (54 patients, mortality rate 13 percent); Score 3, five or more positive signs (40 patients, mortality rate 35 percent) (p less than 0.001). The combination of computerized tomography findings and prognostic signs had the best predictive value. Patients in Group III, Score 3 (24 patients) or Group III, Score 2 (19 patients) had mortality rates of 58 percent and 32 percent, respectively, and complications developed in all of the survivors. In addition, all except two acute pancreatitis patients in whom pancreatic abscess developed were found in Group III (p less than 0.0001). Furthermore, for Group III patients, the prediction of death associated with abscesses was enhanced by the number of prognostic signs. The mortality rate increased from 17 percent for Score 2 patients to 81 percent for Score 3 patients (p = 0.0078). As a result of this study, we recommend early computerized tomography for all Score 2 and Score 3 patients, since it allows prompt recognition of patients at high risk for systemic and local complications. Adequate therapy can then be directed to the group of patients to whom it is best suited. Serial computerized tomographies should be reserved for those patients presenting with phlegmonous extrapancreatic spread.

Aggressive treatment of severe diffuse peritonitis: a prospective study

In a prospective study of 22 patients with diffuse peritonitis managed by the method of electively staged multiple laparotomies, the abdomen was left open in 9 patients. The patients were selected on the basis of the severity of their intra-abdominal infection: only massive faecal peritonitis, postoperative peritonitis and pancreatic abscesses were included. These amounted to only 9 per cent of all patients with intra-abdominal infection treated over a 2-year period. Up to seven re-operations were required per patient. In view of a high mortality rate of 32 per cent, the superiority of this aggressive management strategy over conventional methods is not fully established.

Management of infected pancreatic necrosis by open drainage

Twenty-eight consecutive patients with infected pancreatic necrosis were managed by extensive unroofing of the superior retroperitoneum, blunt pancreatic sequestrectomy, laparotomy pad packing of the lesser sac over a layer of Adaptic gauze, and scheduled re-explorations at intervals of 2-3 days (open drainage). Wounds were permitted to heal by secondary intention. All patients were maintained on intravenous hyperalimentation. Three of the 28 patients died (11%); none died of sepsis. Procedure-specific complications included: pancreatic fistula (10 patients), incisional hernia (8 patients), persistent functional gastric outlet obstruction (2 patients), retroperitoneal venous hemorrhage (2 patients), and intestinal fistula (1 patient). Limited initial experience with dynamic pancreatography and serial monitoring of acute phase reactants as indicators of pancreatic necrosis is promising. Compared with historic controls, open drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis represents a significant advance over more conventional surgical approaches. Controlled studies and more widespread experience are necessary for further evaluation of this procedure.

Incidence of necrotizing pancreatitis and factors related to mortality

Of 348 cases of acute pancreatitis presenting between 1980 and 1985, extensive retroperitoneal necrosis with bacterial or fungal superinfection developed in only 17 (4.8 percent). However, in 14 of the 17 patients (80 percent), multiple surgical interventions and intensive supportive therapy failed to control the process, and they died from complications. Deaths occurred after a prolonged in-hospital course characterized by sequential failure of organ systems. If the salvage of these patients is to be optimized, as in some reports, the timing of the first surgical procedure has to be very carefully made based on the clinical and laboratory findings, and most importantly, the results of computerized tomography. Exploration is probably best carried out through an extended subcostal incision, and a determined attempt must be made to remove all of the necrotic tissue. Little reliance can be placed on the possibility that significant amounts of residual necrotic tissue can be aspirated through sump catheters or evacuated by irrigations. We believe that the poor results in this series lend strong support to those who have already advocated much more universal application of the open abdomen technique in the management of these patients with widespread anterior pararenal space necrosis.