Parietal cell vagotomy as an emergency procedure for bleeding peptic ulcer

A review on treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer: a collaborative task of gastroenterologist and surgeon

The majority of patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage bleed from peptic diseases erosive gastritis and duodenal or gastric ulcers. Early gastroscopy is essential in order to reach a diagnosis, assess the prognosis, and institute appropriate therapy. In a meta-analysis it was shown that H2-antagonists significantly reduced mortality. However, two large, prospective and placebo-controlled studies with famotidine and omeprazole failed to show reduction of rebleeding or death. The value of endoscopic haemostatic therapy in patients with high-risk peptic ulcers (active bleeding and non-bleeding visible vessel) has been firmly established with 75% decrease in rebleeding and operation rate, and a 40% reduction in mortality. Risk factors for an adverse outcome are: elderly patients, concomitant diseases and large ulcers in the posterior duodenal bulb or on the lesser curvature. The mortality for emergency surgery in upper GI bleeding is still 10-50%. The mortality of elective operations is less than 2%. Some studies have reduced mortality by avoiding emergency surgery through early elective surgery in high-risk patients.

Vagotomy

Peptic ulcer disease was for years a common indication for surgery in Danish hospitals and considerable experience in partial gastrectomy was gained. In spite of an unquestionable mortality rate and a number of patients having postgastrectomy complaints, results were generally recognized as acceptable. Danish surgeons were for long reluctant to take up vagotomy and drainage as a primary ulcer operation, but when they did start a large number of procedures were performed. In fact, the use of this treatment culminated during two to three decades. However, on a basis of experiences from these years, Danish research contributed actively to the international evolution of the surgical vagotomy technique, the evaluation of clinical results and the studies of postoperative alterations in gastric physiology. References are selected from an extensive literature and are in no way complete.

Current surgical management of duodenal ulcers

The optimal treatment of duodenal ulcer disease today requires familiarity with a variety of operative approaches. Experience and judgment are needed to select the best procedure for the individual patient presenting with a specific ulcer complication. Improved medical therapy has relegated surgery largely to the role of emergency life-saving intervention. Nonetheless, the goal of surgery remains cure of the ulcer diathesis with avoidance of postoperative side effects. Toward this end, proximal gastric vagotomy has proved itself to be the operation of choice, not only for intractable pain, but also for perforation and perhaps for bleeding in selected good-risk patients. Its efficacy in the treatment of obstructing duodenal ulcer has not been demonstrated. Modifications of proximal gastric vagotomy, including the use of laparoscopic techniques, are currently being evaluated in patients with intractable duodenal ulcer pain.

Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease

Elective surgery for peptic ulcer disease has diminished significantly over the past 15 years. However, emergency surgery has not shown a decline. Some series have even reported an increase in hospitalizations and operations for hemorrhage. The appropriate surgical procedure for peptic ulcer disease must be tailored to the specific needs of the individual patient. During emergency operations for hemorrhage from duodenal ulcer, we recommend suture ligature of the bleeding vessel and vagotomy-pyloroplasty for high-risk patients, or vagotomy-antrectomy for the lower-risk patient. Bleeding gastric ulcers should be resected, if possible. For massive hemorrhage from stress ulceration requiring surgery, near-total or total gastrectomy should be performed. Perforated duodenal ulcers are best managed by closure and a definitive ulcer operation, such as vagotomy-pyloroplasty. Perforated gastric ulcers are best excised but may be simply closed if conditions do not favor resection. In these situations, biopsy should be performed. We recommend truncal vagotomy-antrectomy for patients presenting with obstruction. Vagotomy (truncal or proximal gastric) with drainage is an acceptable alternative in this situation. For patients with intractable ulcer disease or for those who are noncompliant, proximal gastric vagotomy is the preferred operation. However, other operations may need to be considered, depending on the specific situation. Recurrent ulceration needs appropriate work-up to determine the possible cause. Although patients with ulcer recurrence initially may be placed on medical treatment, about 50% will require reoperation. The most effective procedure for peptic ulcer disease is truncal vagotomy-antrectomy, which has a recurrence rate of less than 1%. The procedure with the least morbidity and the fewest undesirable side effects is proximal gastric vagotomy. Ulcer recurrence after proximal gastric vagotomy or truncal vagotomy-pyloroplasty is in the range of 10% to 15%.

Proximal gastric vagotomy in the emergency treatment of bleeding duodenal ulcer

Proximal gastric vagotomy for bleeding duodenal ulcer was performed in 52 low-risk patients between 1973 and 1986. Duodenotomy without violation of the pylorus was done in all patients to allow inspection and control of the bleeding site. The median duration of operation was 3 hours and 20 minutes, although 25% of the procedures required 4 or more hours. There was no postoperative mortality and no early reoperations. Among the six patients with postoperative complications, one rebled from the ulcer and two developed prolonged gastric atony. At the time of follow-up (median, 2.9 years), 48 of the patients were alive and 4 had died of non-ulcer causes. No patient had significant postvagotomy sequelae. Ulcer recurrence was documented in six patients, and three required reoperation. Proximal gastric vagotomy is a safe, effective therapy for bleeding duodenal ulcer. Because of the length of the operation, it should be restricted to low-risk patients who are hemodynamically stable at the time of operation.

Indications for parietal cell vagotomy without drainage in gastrointestinal surgery

Parietal cell vagotomy (PCV) was used for a variety of gastrointestinal conditions in 658 patients. Operative and late related deaths after PCV were 1.1% (3/273) in patients with intractable duodenal ulcers, 1.1% (1/91) in perforated ulcers, 0% (0/43) in Type I gastric ulcers, 0% (0/45) in pyloric and prepyloric ulcers, 3.2% (6/188) when combined with fundoplication, 8.7% (2/23) when combined with vascular surgery, and 4.2% (1/24) in ulcer patients with acute bleeding. The recurrent ulcer rate after PCV was 8.4% in patients operated on for duodenal ulcer, 6.4% for perforated ulcer, 5.3% for bleeding ulcers, 10% for Type I gastric ulcers, and 31% for pyloric and prepyloric ulcers. PCV was preferred to total gastrectomy in four patients in whom a gastrinoma could not be located. PCV was used in 188 patients with reflux esophagitis and in 12 patients with achalasia to facilitate fundoplication and placement of the myotomy, respectively. Based on the results of the study, PCV is contraindicated in patients with pyloric and prepyloric ulcers. PCV is not recommended when traumatic dilatation of the pylorus is required to overcome obstruction. PCV may have limited application in patients with bleeding ulcers and Type I gastric ulcers. In our experience PCV is not contraindicated in patients with ulcers resistant to H2 receptor antagonists. PCV may be contraindicated when acid hypersecretion exceeds an as-yet undetermined level. PCV is an ideal procedure for intractable duodenal ulcers and perforated ulcers.

Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy

Proximal gastric vagotomy is nearing its twentieth year in clinical use as an operation for peptic ulcer disease. No other acid-reducing operation has undergone as much scrutiny or study. At this time, the evidence of such studies and long-term follow-up strongly supports the use of proximal gastric vagotomy as the treatment of choice for chronic duodenal ulcer in patients who have failed medical therapy. Its application in treating the complications of peptic ulcer disease, which recently have come to represent an increasingly greater percentage of all operations done for peptic ulcer disease, is well-tested. However, initial series suggest that it should probably occupy a prominent role in treating some of these complications, particularly in selected patients, in the future. The operation has the well-documented ability to reduce gastric acid production, not inhibit gastric bicarbonate production, and also minimally inhibit gastric motility. The combination of these physiologic results after proximal gastric vagotomy, along with preservation of the normal antropyloroduodenal mechanism of gastrointestinal control, serve to allow patients with proximal gastric vagotomy the improved benefits of significantly fewer severe gastrointestinal side effects than are seen after other operations for peptic ulcer disease.