The spinal accessory nerve plexus, the trapezius muscle, and shoulder stabilization after radical neck cancer surgery

Surface anatomy in dermatology: Part II-Impact on perioperative management, procedural technique, and cosmesis

This CME series reviews updated Delphi consensus surface anatomy terminology through the lens of common medical and procedural dermatology scenarios, helping to underscore high-yield points that can be readily integrated into clinical practice to support patient care. Part I of the series reviewed the current state of standardized surface anatomy, provided an illustrative review of consensus terminology, highlighted prominent landmarks that can aid in critical diagnoses, and related the importance of precise terminology to principles of medical management. Part II will utilize consensus terminology to heighten recognition of key landmarks in procedural dermatology to support optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Anatomy and clinical application of suprascapular nerve to accessory nerve transfer

BACKGROUND

Loss of motor function in the trapezius muscle is one complication of radical neck dissection after cutting the accessory nerve (AN) during surgery. Nerve repair is an effective method to restore trapezius muscle function, and includes neurolysis, direct suture, and nerve grafting. The suprascapular nerve (SCN) and AN are next to each other in position. The function of the AN and SCN in shoulder elevation and abduction movement is synergistic. SCN might be considered by surgeons for AN reanimation.

AIM

To obtain anatomical and clinical data for partial suprascapular nerve-to-AN transfer.

METHODS

Ten sides of cadavers perfused with formalin were obtained from the Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Peking University Health Science Center. The SCN (n = 10) and AN (n = 10) were carefully dissected in the posterior triangle of the neck, and the trapezius muscle was dissected to fully display the accessory nerve. The length of the SCN from the origin of the brachial plexus (a point) to the scapular notch (b point) and the distance of the SCN from the origin point (a point) to the point (c point) where the AN entered the border of the trapezius muscle were measured. The length and branches of the AN in the trapezius muscle were measured. A female patient aged 55 years underwent surgery for partial SCN to AN transfer at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. The patient suffered from recurrent upper gingival cancer. Radical neck dissection was performed on the right side, and the right AN was removed at the intersection between the nerve and the posterior border of the SCM muscle. One-third of the diameter of the SCN was cut off, and combined epineurial and perineurial sutures were applied between the distal end of the cut-off fascicles of the SCN and the proximal end of the AN without tension. Both subjective and objective evaluations were performed before, three months after, and nine months after surgery. For the subjective evaluation, the questionnaire included the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) and the Constant Shoulder Scale. Electromyography was used for the objective examination. Data were analyzed using t tests with SPSS 19.0 software to determine the relationship between the length of the SCN and the linear distance. A P value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The whole length of the AN in the trapezius muscle was 16.89 cm. The average numbers of branches distributed in the descending, horizontal and ascending portions were 3.8, 2.6 and 2.2, respectively. The diameter of the AN was 1.94 mm at the anterior border of the trapezius. The length of the suprascapular nerve from the origin of the brachial plexus to the scapular notch was longer than the distance of the suprascapular nerve from the origin point to the point where the accessory nerve entered the upper edge of the trapezius muscle. The amplitude of trapezius muscle electromyography indicated that both the horizontal and ascending portions of the trapezius muscle on the right side had better function than the left side nine months after surgery. The results showed that the right-sided supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles did not lose more function than the left side.

CONCLUSION

Based on anatomical data and clinical application, partial suprascapular nerve-to-AN transfer could be achieved and may improve innervation of the affected trapezius muscle after radical neck dissection.

[A 73-year-old man with polyradiculopathy and multiple cranial neuropathies emerging separate from the originating dermatome of a varicella zoster skin lesion]

A 73-year-old man developed delayed-onset multiple cranial neuropathies of cranial nerves V, VII and VIII, and segmental paresis in the ipsilateral upper extremity related to the C4 to Th1 segment, after all skin lesions with varicella zoster (VZV) on the left neck of the C3-4 dermatome had dried and crusted over. On admission, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed pleocytosis (all mononuclear cells, 12/μl). Treatment was started with intravenous acyclovir (10 mg/kg, every 8 h for 14 days) and methylprednisolone (1,000 mg/day for 3 days). Four days after starting treatment, left segmental paresis was improved, but the multiple cranial neuropathies persisted. Oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) was administered for 5 days, then tapered off. All neurological symptoms had disappeared by hospital day 23. Of particular interest was the discrepancy between skin regions affected by VZV (C3-4) and the regions of cranial neuropathy (cranial nerves V, VII, and VIII) and muscle weakness innervated by C4-Th1. Although CSF was negative for VZV DNA according to PCR testing, the antibody index for VZV was elevated. This suggests intrathecal synthesis of VZV antibodies and supports the diagnosis of VZV meningitis. Also, all cranial nerves involved in this case were reported to have the cranial nerve ganglia where VZV could have established latency and been reactivated. This suggests concurrent reactivation on each cranial nerve ganglia without cutaneous lesions, as zoster sine herpete. In addition, anastomoses among the upper cervical nerves, which are found in some patients, may have contributed to this condition. These mechanisms underlie various neurological symptoms associated with VZV infection.

Variations of the accessory nerve: anatomical study including previously undocumented findings-expanding our misunderstanding of this nerve

INTRODUCTION

The anatomy of the accessory nerve has been well described but continued new clinical and anatomical findings exemplify our lack of a full understanding of the course of this nerve. Therefore, this study aimed to expand on our knowledge of the course of the 11th cranial nerve via anatomical dissections.

METHODS

Fifty-six cadavers (112 sides) underwent dissection of the accessory nerve from its cranial and spinal origins to its emergence into the posterior cervical triangle. Immunohistochemistry was performed when appropriate.

RESULTS

Our findings included two cases (1.8%) where the nerve was duplicated, one intracranially and one extracranially. One accessory nerve (0.9%) was found to enter its own dural compartment within the jugular foramen. The majority of sides (80%) were found to have a cranial root of the accessory nerve. Thirty-one sides (28%) had connections to cervical dorsal roots medially and three sides (2.7%) laterally. Medial connections were most common with the C1 nerve. Medial components of these dorsal root connections were all sensory in nature. However, lateral components were motor on two sides (1.8%). Nerves traveled anterior to the internal jugular vein on 88% of sides. One (0.9%) left side nerve joined an interneural anastomosis between the dorsal rootlets. Macroganglia were found on the spinal part of the intracranial nerve on 13% of sides. The lesser occipital nerve arose directly from the accessory nerve on two sides (1.8%) and communicated with the accessory nerve on 5.4% of sides. One side (0.9%) was found to communicate with the facial nerve with both nerves innervating the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional anatomical knowledge of the variants of the accessory nerve may benefit patient care when this nerve is pathologically involved.

A Systematic Review of the Cervical Plexus Accessory Innervation and Its Role in Dental Anesthesia

INTRODUCTION

Accessory innervation (AI) may account for the persistent sensation perceived after successful mandibular anesthesia in the adult patient. The purpose of this systematic review was to record the quality of evidence pertaining to the cervical plexus (CP) AI in dental anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic and manual searches were conducted using Ovid and Medline of articles published from 1922 to March of 2015. Studies written in any language were included as long as they involved: (i) humans, animals, and/or cadavers AND (ii) anatomical and/or research anesthetic-technique approaches and/or clinical approaches. Exclusion criteria were (i) maxillary buccal infiltration, (ii) no abstract/paper available, (iii) studies that do not comprise the description of the branches of the CP branches in dentistry and (iv) duplicated articles. The articles were reviewed and graded by levels of evidence (LOE) through a methodological scoring index (MSI).

RESULTS

Forty-four out of 185 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One randomized control trial, 3 comprehensive reviews, 1 cohort study, 5 case series/reports, 16 poor-quality cohort and case series/reports and 18 reviews/case, reports/expert opinions were found. Of the 44 publications, there were 4 LOE 1, 1 LOE 2, 5 LOE 3, 20 LOE 4 and 14 LOE 5 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSI helped to classify papers LOE in a standardized and objective approach. The objective evidence quality occurrence recorded was found to be LOE 4 (n = 20) > LOE 5 (n = 14) > LOE 3 (n = 5) > LOE 1 (n = 4) > LOE 2 (n = 1). The anatomy of the CP needs to be reexamined and understood in the anatomical literature.

MRI findings of spinal accessory neuropathy

AIM

To characterise the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of patients with spinal accessory nerve (SAN) denervation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve patients who had SAN denervation on electromyography (EMG) were included. The sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles and the SAN were assessed using MRI.

RESULTS

Trapezius muscle atrophy was seen in 11 (92%), and of those patients, T2/short tau inversion recovery (STIR) signal hyperintensity was also demonstrated in seven (58%). All three patients with prior neck surgery had scarring around the SAN, and one of these patients demonstrated a neuroma, which was confirmed surgically.

CONCLUSION

Features of SAN neuropathy on MRI include atrophy and T2/STIR signal hyperintensity of the trapezius, and in patients who have had posterior triangle neck surgery, scarring may be seen around the nerve.

Intraoperative brief electrical stimulation (BES) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Shoulder pain and dysfunction are common after oncologic neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC), due to traction, compression, and devascularization injuries to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN). Shoulder pain and dysfunction can hinder postoperative rehabilitation and hygiene, activities of daily living (ADLs), and return to work after treatment for HNC. Due to the rising incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer, patients are often diagnosed in the third or fourth decade of life, leaving many potential working years lost if shoulder dysfunction occurs. Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance and accelerate neuronal regeneration after injury through a brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF)-driven molecular pathway in multiple peripheral nerves in both humans and animals.

Methods/Design

This is a randomized controlled trial testing the effect of intraoperative BES on postoperative shoulder pain and dysfunction. All adult participants with a new diagnosis of HNC undergoing surgery with neck dissection, including Level IIb and postoperative radiotherapy, will be enrolled. Participants will undergo intraoperative BES after completion of neck dissection for 60 min continuously at 20 Hz, 3 to 5 V, in 100-msec pulses. Postoperatively, participants will be evaluated using the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, a scale that assesses shoulder pain, ADLs, strength, and range of motion. Secondary outcomes measured will include nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyographic (EMG) studies, as well as scores on the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), and the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) score. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Discussion

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of BES on postoperative clinical and objective shoulder functional outcomes and pain after oncologic neck dissection. BES has been shown to be successful in accelerating peripheral nerve regeneration in both animal and human participants in multiple different peripheral nerves. If successful, this technique may provide an adjunctive prevention option for shoulder pain and dysfunction in HNC patients.

Trial registration

NCT02268344: 17 October 2014.

Expanding what is known of the anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve

The spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is classically considered a motor nerve innervating the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. Its anatomical relevance derives from the high prevalence of lesions following head and neck surgeries. As expected, trapezius weakness and atrophy are the most common findings; however, it is also commonly accompanied by pain and other sensory deficits that have no clear explanation, suggesting other functions. We have recently seen two patients presenting with an unrecognized sign, that is, subclavicular/pectoral asymmetry secondary to the SAN lesion. Retrospectively, we reviewed other patients with similar findings in our case series and in the literature. We discuss the anatomical connections of the SAN with the superficial cervical plexus and propose an explanation for this finding. Of the 41 patients in our series, we identified this sign in all who had preoperative photographs. New insights on the anatomy and connections of the SAN may account for the diversity of symptoms and signs presented following an operative intervention as well as the variability of its severity.

A Case of Ramsay Hunt Syndrome with Atypical Presentation

Ramsay Hunt syndrome is a rare complication of herpes zoster which results from the reactivation of the latent varicella-zoster virus in the geniculate ganglion. Although facial nerve is the most common affected nerve in Ramsay Hunt syndrome, other cranial and cervical nerves can also be affected. We present an atypical case of Ramsay Hunt syndrome in a 42-year-old male, with cervical nerve involvement. As spontaneous recovery rate in Ramsay Hunt syndrome is low, early diagnosis and treatment plays a key role in full recovery of paralysis.

Histologic confirmation of neuronal cell bodies along the spinal accessory nerve

INTRODUCTION

Most sources conclude that the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is a purely motor nerve. There are some reports that suggest a sensory component, although the exact nature of such sensory fibers has yet to be elucidated. With such discrepancies in the literature and with well-established pain syndromes of unknown etiology following SAN injury, the authors performed the present study to better clarify this anatomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The entire accessory nerve was harvested from 10 adult cadavers. Samples were then submitted for immunohistochemical analyses.

RESULTS

Occasional microganglia cells were identified along the SAN in all specimens. These ganglia were most numerous along the intracranial segment of the SAN, but none was found along the cranial rootlets of the accessory nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuronal cell bodies were identified along the course of the SAN in human cadavers. Although the function is not certain, such cells have been found in other animals to be nocioceptive in nature. Pending further study, these cells may be found to be involved in enigmatic pain syndromes thought to arise in the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles.

A comprehensive review with potential significance during skull base and neck operations, Part II: glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory, and hypoglossal nerves and cervical spinal nerves 1-4

Knowledge of the possible neural interconnections found between the lower cranial and upper cervical nerves may prove useful to surgeons who operate on the skull base and upper neck regions in order to avoid inadvertent traction or transection. We review the literature regarding the anatomy, function, and clinical implications of the complex neural networks formed by interconnections between the lower cranial and upper cervical nerves. A review of germane anatomic and clinical literature was performed. The review is organized into two parts. Part I discusses the anastomoses between the trigeminal, facial, and vestibulocochlear nerves or their branches and other nerve trunks or branches in the vicinity. Part II deals with the anastomoses between the glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory and hypoglossal nerves and their branches or between these nerves and the first four cervical spinal nerves; the contribution of the autonomic nervous system to these neural plexuses is also briefly reviewed. Part II is presented in this article. Extensive and variable neural anastomoses exist between the lower cranial nerves and between the upper cervical nerves in such a way that these nerves with their extra-axial communications can be collectively considered a plexus.

Anastomoses between lower cranial and upper cervical nerves: a comprehensive review with potential significance during skull base and neck operations, part I: trigeminal, facial, and vestibulocochlear nerves

Descriptions of the anatomy of the neural communications among the cranial nerves and their branches is lacking in the literature. Knowledge of the possible neural interconnections found among these nerves may prove useful to surgeons who operate in these regions to avoid inadvertent traction or transection. We review the literature regarding the anatomy, function, and clinical implications of the complex neural networks formed by interconnections among the lower cranial and upper cervical nerves. A review of germane anatomic and clinical literature was performed. The review is organized in two parts. Part I concerns the anastomoses between the trigeminal, facial, and vestibulocochlear nerves or their branches with any other nerve trunk or branch in the vicinity. Part II concerns the anastomoses among the glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory and hypoglossal nerves and their branches or among these nerves and the first four cervical spinal nerves; the contribution of the autonomic nervous system to these neural plexuses is also briefly reviewed. Part I is presented in this article. An extensive anastomotic network exists among the lower cranial nerves. Knowledge of such neural intercommunications is important in diagnosing and treating patients with pathology of the skull base.

An unexpected case of Ramsay Hunt syndrome: case report and literature review

Background

Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS) is a rare, severe complication of varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation in the geniculate ganglion. Facial paralysis is one of the features and without treatment, it fully recovers in as little as 20% of cases; this is much improved if treatment is started within 72 hours. This case is noteworthy in that coexistence of facial palsy with cervical dermatome involvement by VZV is not typical of RHS. Yet, it has been reported before.

Case presentation

A 54 year old Caucasian woman presented with right ear discomfort, difficulty hearing and a vesicular rash along the pinnae, 8 days after the eruption of a similar rash in the right C2-C4 dermatomes. 2 days later, she awoke with a partial right-sided facial paralysis, which improved with treatment (valacyclovir and prednisone).

Conclusions

This case is most pertinent to Family Practice, Otolaryngology and Neurology. It highlights the possible co-existence of RHS with cervical VZV reactivation and encourages physicians to monitor for this complication even before geniculate ganglion reactivation occurs. RHS is a rare disease that can present with vague symptoms. A high index of suspicion and close follow up are essential. Early intervention with antivirals and corticosteroids has shown significantly improved outcomes in these patients.

Ultrasound visualization of the spinal accessory nerve in vivo

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent injury of the spinal accessory nerve during surgical procedures is a cause of significant morbidity with medicolegal repercussions. Surface anatomy is an unreliable guide to the nerve's location. We suggest that ultrasound can be used to map the course of the nerve in the posterior triangle of the neck.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty healthy subjects (28 females, mean age 37 y) were scanned using a VF13-5 linear probe and a Siemens Sonoline Antares ultrasound machine (Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Malvern, PA). The caliber, course, and distribution of the nerve in the posterior triangle of the neck were recorded.

RESULTS

The nerve was visualized bilaterally in all subjects, running superficially across the posterior triangle with either a straight (56%) or tortuous (44%) course at a depth of about 3 mm beneath the skin surface. It had a mean caliber of 0.76 ± 0.12 mm. It exited the posterior border of sternocleidomastoid at a mean of 6.7 (4.0-9.4) cm below the mastoid process and 1.1 (0.1-2.1) cm above the great auricular point and penetrated the anterior border of trapezius 5.4 (2.1-9.2) cm above the clavicle. Importantly, 58% of nerves divided into 2-4 branches before penetrating trapezius; the nerve branched on at least one side in 49 of 50 individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The spinal accessory nerve and its anatomical variants can be consistently and reliably demonstrated by ultrasound in normal individuals. Surface anatomical landmarks are not a reliable guide to the position and course of the nerve in the posterior triangle. Preoperative mapping of the nerve with ultrasound may reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury.

Study of the cervical plexus innervation of the trapezius muscle

OBJECT

There is conflicting and often anecdotal evidence regarding the potential motor innervation of the trapezius muscle by cervical nerves, with most authors attributing such fibers to proprioception. As knowledge of such potential motor innervations may prove useful to the neurosurgeon, the present study aimed to elucidate this anatomy further.

METHODS

Fifteen adult cadavers (30 sides) underwent dissection of the posterior triangle of the neck and harvesting of cervical nerve fibers found to enter the trapezius muscle. Random fibers were evaluated histologically to determine fiber type (that is, motor vs sensory axons).

RESULTS

In addition to an innervation from the spinal accessory nerve, the authors also identified cervical nerve innervations of all trapezius muscles. For these innervations, 3 sides were found to have fibers derived from C-2 to C-4, 2 sides had fibers derived from C-2 to C-3, and 25 sides had fibers derived from C-3 to C-4. Fibers derived from C-2 to C-4 were classified as a Type I innervation, those from C-2 to C-3 were classified as a Type II innervation, and those from C-3 to C-4 were classified as a Type III innervation. Immunohistochemical analysis of fibers from each of these types confirmed the presence of motor axons.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the authors' study, cervical nerves innervate the trapezius muscle with motor fibers. These findings support surgical and clinical experiences in which partial or complete trapezius function is maintained after injury to the spinal accessory nerve. The degree to which these nerves innervate this muscle, however, necessitates further study. Such information may be useful following nerve transfer procedures, denervation techniques for cervical dystonia, or sacrifice of the spinal accessory nerve due to pathological entities.

Accessory nerve function after level 2b-preserving selective neck dissection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the relationship between accessory nerve functions and level 2b-preserving selective neck dissection.

METHODS

Forty-one necks of 30 patients with laryngeal cancer who underwent unilateral or bilateral level 2b-preserving neck dissections, between February 2003 and July 2005, were evaluated. Neck and shoulder movements and muscle strengths were examined and electroneuromyography (ENMG) was performed preoperatively at the postoperative 21st day and 6th month. Pathological anatomical findings at the postoperative 6th month were also evaluated.

RESULTS

All shoulder movements and muscle strengths were preserved. Neck extension, rotation movements, and flexion strengths were restricted. ENMG values were affected moderately in the early postoperative period and improved slightly in the late postoperative period. None of the patients developed shoulder syndrome or adhesive capsulitis.

CONCLUSION

Preserving level 2b during selective neck dissection decreases trauma to the accessory nerve and improves functional results.

TRANSFER OF A FASCICLE FROM THE POSTERIOR CORD TO THE SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE AFTER INJURY OF THE UPPER ROOTS OF THE BRACHIAL PLEXUS

OBJECTIVE

A new nerve transfer technique using a healthy fascicle of the posterior cord for suprascapular nerve reconstruction is presented. This technique was used in a patient with posttraumatic brachial plexopathy resulting in upper trunk injury with proximal root stumps that were unavailable for grafting associated with multiple nerve dysfunction.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 45-year-old man sustained a right brachial plexus injury after a bicycle accident. Clinical evaluation and electromyography indicated upper trunk involvement. Trapezius muscle function and triceps strength were normal on physical examination.

INTERVENTION

The patient underwent a combined supra- and infraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus. A neuroma-in-continuity of the upper trunk and fibrotic C5 and C6 roots were identified. Electrical stimulation of the phrenic and spinal accessory nerves produced no response. The suprascapular nerve was dissected from the upper trunk, transected, and rerouted to the infraclavicular fossa. A healthy fascicle of the posterior cord to the triceps muscle was transferred to the suprascapular nerve. At the time of the 1-year follow-up evaluation, arm abduction against gravity and external rotation reached 40 and 34 degrees, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The posterior cord can be used as a source of donor fascicle to the suprascapular nerve after its infraclavicular relocation. This new intraplexal nerve transfer could be applied in patients with isolated injury of the upper trunk and concomitant lesion of the extraplexal nerve donors usually used for reinnervation of the suprascapular nerve.

Assessment of shoulder function after functional neck dissection and selective neck dissection (Levels I, II, III) in patients with carcinoma of tongue: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare shoulder function with respect to pain and disability in patients who have undergone nerve sparing neck dissection i.e. selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for carcinoma tongue on a follow up of minimum six months.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients were selected for this study. 50 patients who had undergone selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and 50 who underwent functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue from January 2005 to January 2007 were asked to participate in this study. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess pain and disability. Pain and disability scores were then compared between the two nerve sparing dissections.

RESULTS

100% of the patients in Selective Neck Dissection (SND) (levels I, II, III) group and in Functional Neck Dissection (FND) groups complained of pain. Though there is pain present in both the treatment groups, no significant difference in the pain values was found between FND and SND (levels I, II, III) in any of the pain parameters. Disability was present in both the treatment groups. However patients who have undergone FND had significantly higher severity of disability when compared to SND (levels I, II, III) especially during activities which involve shoulder abduction like dressing, doing heavy household work, hair wash and washing clothes/dishes (5.18, 5.22, 5.5, 4.88 in FND and 2.26, 4.08, 4.58, 2.2 in SND (levels I, II, III) respectively. Disability perceived during other activities like doing heavy household and facial care was 2.08 and 1.84 in both the treatment groups respectively.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION

Degree of shoulder morbidity is much higher in patients who have undergone FND as compared to SND (levels I, II, III) as a treatment modality for carcinoma tongue, even though both the treatment options are nerve preserving.

Accessory nerve: anatomy and surgical identification

The XIth cranial nerve or accessory nerve provides the motor supply to the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. It is frequently encountered during neck surgery, and as such is at risk of iatrogenic injury, resulting in the ‘shoulder syndrome’. Historically, the nerve was sacrificed on oncological grounds during radical neck dissection. However, the basis for sacrifice is unfounded in the majority of cases, and accessory nerve sparing selective neck dissection has equal oncological efficacy. The path of the nerve in the neck is very variable, and there is not a wholly reliable landmark for its identification. However, there are a number of methods described in the literature to guide the surgeon in its identification. This paper provides a systematic review of all the methods available for identification of the accessory nerve, and comments on the reliability of each. In doing so, the detailed anatomy of the accessory nerve is also described.

The relationship between shoulder pain and damage to the cervical plexus following neck dissection

The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between shoulder pain and damage to the cervical plexus after neck dissection. The study was performed prospectively on 34 neck sides of 17 patients with laryngeal cancer who underwent laryngectomy plus bilateral selective neck dissection (II, III, IV, +/- VI) at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Uludag University between December 2003 and October 2004. The cervical plexus was protected on one side of the neck and sacrificed on the other, while the accessory nerve was spared on both sides. The degree of sensorial innervation of the cervical plexus and shoulder pain were evaluated in the preoperative period and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Data obtained from both sides of the neck were compared. Sensory reception scores were statistically higher in the neck sides in which the cervical plexus was spared than in those where the plexus was sacrificed (P < 0.05). However, the degree of shoulder pain was similar on both sides of the neck (P > 0.05). Damage to the cervical plexus during neck dissection causes loss of sensorial innervation of the neck, but sacrificing the cervical plexus during selective neck dissection has no negative effect on shoulder pain.

Surgical treatment for spinal accessory nerve injury

We report on the surgical results of spinal accessory nerve injuries between 1992-2003. We operated on 10 patients (9 female, and 1 male) who had injuries of the spinal accessory nerve. All injuries were iatrogenic. The mean age of patients was 39.2 years (range, 20-57 years). The average interval between date of injury and surgery was 7 months (range, 4-12 months). All patients had stiffness and pain in the shoulder girdle. The average active abduction of the shoulder joint was 79.5 degrees (range, 60-100 degrees ) before surgery. End-to-end repairs were performed in 7 cases, and graft repairs were indicated in 3 cases. The mean follow-up period was 18.4 months (range, 8-36 months). The average active abduction of the shoulder joint was 171 degrees (range, 140-180 degrees ) at time of final follow-up.

Variations in the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle

Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve has been widely documented and can have medico-legal implications. The resulting syndrome of pain, paralysis and winging of the scapula are often the source of considerable morbidity. This paper researches the degree of accuracy achievable in mapping the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the region of the posterior triangle with a view to creating a cartographical aid to surgical procedures. The necks of 25 adult cadavers were dissected bilaterally to expose the spinal accessory nerve. Variations in the course and distribution of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle were recorded along with its relationship to the borders of sternocleidomastoid and trapezius. Considerable variation was seen in the surface and regional anatomy of the nerve and in the contribution of the cervical plexus to the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle. Measurements of the running course and exit point of the nerve into and from the posterior triangle differed significantly from those previously recorded. Delineation of an accurate surface anatomy was not possible. Creating a map to define the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle is an unrealistic goal given its wide variations in man. Avoidance of damage to the spinal accessory nerve cannot be achieved by slavishly adhering to surface markings given in textbooks, but only by cautious dissection during operations on the posterior triangle.

Reconstruction of accessory nerve defects with sternocleidomastoid muscle—great auricular nerve flap

We introduced a new method for reconstruction of accessory nerve defects by using the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM)-great auricular nerve flap. Thirty-four patients receiving traditional radical neck dissection were divided into two groups: the accessory nerve not-reconstructed group (Group A, N = 19) and the accessory nerve reconstructed group (Group B, n = 15). The surgical procedure of the reconstruction is described in detail. Postoperative shoulder functions were compared between the two groups. We found that Group B experienced much better shoulder function recovery than Group A. Both groups had good wound healing. It is concluded that reconstruction of accessory nerve defects with SCM-great auricular nerve flap is simple, effective and complication-free and worthwhile.

Shoulder complaints after nerve sparing neck dissections

The purpose of the study was to analyse the prevalence of shoulder complaints after nerve sparing neck dissection at least 1 year after surgery, and to analyse the influence of radiation therapy on shoulder complaints. Patients were interviewed for shoulder complaints, and patients filled out the shoulder disability questionnaire to evaluate shoulder disability in daily activities. In total 137 patients; 51 after modified radical neck dissection (MRND), 21 after postero-lateral neck dissection (PLND), and 65 after supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND) were analysed. After MRND 33.3% of the patients experienced shoulder complaints, after PLND 66.7%, and after SOHND 20% of the patients experienced shoulder complaints. Type of neck dissection was significantly (P < 0.001) related to shoulder complaints. Outcome on the shoulder disability questionnaire also showed a significant (P < 0.01) difference in outcome for type of neck dissection. The prevalence of shoulder complaints after SOHND are low, and reduce disability in daily activities. Radiation therapy does not have a significant effect on shoulder complaints and disability.

Surgical outcomes of 111 spinal accessory nerve injuries

OBJECTIVE

Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve is not uncommon during neck surgery involving the posterior cervical triangle, because its superficial course here makes it susceptible. We review injury mechanisms, operative techniques, and surgical outcomes of 111 surgical repairs of the spinal accessory nerve.

METHODS

This retrospective study examines clinical and surgical experience with spinal accessory nerve injuries at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center during a period of 23 years (1978-2000). Surgery was performed on the basis of anatomic and electrophysiological findings at the time of operation. Patients were followed up for an average of 25.6 months.

RESULTS

The most frequent injury mechanism was iatrogenic (103 patients, 93%), and 82 (80%) of these injuries involved lymph node biopsies. Eight injuries were caused by stretch (five patients) and laceration (three patients). The most common procedures were graft repairs in 58 patients. End-to-end repair was used in 26 patients and neurolysis in 19 patients if the nerve was found in continuity with intraoperative electrical evidence of regeneration. Five neurotizations, two burials into muscle, and one removal of ligature material were also performed. More than 95% of patients treated by neurolysis supported by positive nerve action potential recordings improved to Grade 4 or higher. Of 84 patients with lesions repaired by graft or suture, 65 patients (77%) recovered to Grade 3 or higher. The average graft length was 1.5 inches.

CONCLUSION

Surgical exploration and repair of spinal accessory nerve injuries is difficult. With perseverance, however, these patients with complete or severe deficits achieved favorable functional outcomes through operative exploration and repair.

Shoulder pain and disability in daily life, following supraomohyoid neck dissection: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this pilot study was to assess shoulder morbidity; i.e. pain and disability in daily activities, at least 1 year after unilateral or bilateral supraomohyoid neck dissection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

52 patients having been subjected to a supraomohyoid neck dissection completed a questionnaire assessing pain and daily activities.

RESULTS

14 (28%) patients complained of ipsilateral shoulder pain following supraomohyoid neck dissection. The disability from shoulder complaints as perceived during daily life was minor. The pain and disability experienced during daily activities led to dependency upon other people in two patients. This dependency only existed during heavy household activities.

CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that this type of neck dissection was developed to reduce shoulder morbidity, 28% of the patients experienced shoulder pain following supraomohyoid neck dissection. The degree of disability due to shoulder complaints, however, was minor.

Shoulder complaints after neck dissection; is the spinal accessory nerve involved?

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relation between shoulder morbidity (pain and range of motion), and the function of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. Identifying dysfunction of the nerve gives insight in the mechanisms of post-operative shoulder complaints. In total 112 patients after neck dissection (73 males/39 females), mean (SD) age 61 (13) years, participated in the study. The mean duration of follow up was 3 (2) years. Five patients had radical, 43 modified radical, 48 supraomohyoid, and 16 posterolateral neck dissection. Thirty-nine complained of shoulder pain of whom 20 (51%) had dysfunction of the spinal accessory nerve, and 19 (49%) did not. In total 29 patients (26%) had dysfunction of the spinal accessory nerve of whom 20 (69%) had shoulder pain. Shoulder pain was significantly related to dysfunction of the nerve (P < 0.001). Twenty-three patients had a difference in active range of motion in shoulder abduction of > or =40 degrees, of whom 22 (96%) had dysfunction of the nerve. A difference in active shoulder abduction of > or =40 degrees was significantly related to loss of function of the spinal accessory nerve (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Shoulder pain after neck dissection can only be attributed to dysfunction of the spinal accessory nerve in about 50%. If patients experience shoulder pain after neck dissection examination of the trapezius muscle and active bilateral abduction of the shoulder should be made to find out if the spinal accessory nerve is involved.

Management of iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve

Spinal accessory nerve injury results in a debilitating shoulder dysfunction. The trapezius is a major suspensory muscle of the shoulder girdle, and paralysis results in chronic pain and debility from disruption of synchronous scapulohumeral rhythm. This injury usually follows a simple posterior triangle lymph node biopsy and is treatable if appropriate measures are taken in a timely fashion. A major pitfall in early management is either failure to recognize or acknowledge the injury or hoping that it will resolve with conservative treatment. Variation of innervation of the trapezius alters clinical presentation and can make diagnosis difficult. We present a series of six patients with iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve injury following a neck node biopsy. Pain was the most common presenting symptom, and a loss of sustained abduction was the most common physical sign. Three patients had a primary nerve repair and the other three patients had nerve grafting. Maximum recovery time ranged from 4 to 10 months. All patients had varying degrees of recovery of motor function, and all six patients were 100 percent painfree. An algorithm for the management of this distressing condition emphasizes the importance of early referral and highlights the pitfalls in making an accurate diagnosis. Whereas conservative therapy is less predictable and needs careful selection, it also runs the risk of delaying a more effective surgical management. Early operative intervention is more definitive and has the best functional results. Prevention is key and is best achieved by avoiding unnecessary biopsies of the posterior triangle lymph node. When operating, knowledge of posterior neck anatomy and judicious use of the bipolar cautery and magnifying loupes are essential in preventing this problem.

Shoulder function and patient well-being after various types of neck dissections

Preserving the accessory nerve results in a better outcome of the shoulder function after neck dissection. However, little is known about the impact of preserving a cervical contribution to the accessory nerve. This study describes the shoulder function after different types of neck dissections, with the emphasis on the significance of the cervical contribution to the accessory nerve. Fifty-nine patients who underwent neck dissections of various types were included. Thirty-eight patients underwent unilateral radical or modified radical neck dissections, and 21 patients underwent bilateral neck dissections. All the patients were assessed subjectively and objectively, using a questionnaire and an inclinometer. Radical neck dissections inflicted significantly more morbidity than modified radical neck dissections. Preserving a cervical contribution to the accessory nerve did not decrease pain complaints or functional impairment. However, there might be some improvement in range of motion, especially exorotation and anteflexion. Preserving the accessory nerve has a positive influence on shoulder function and complaints. Preserving a cervical contribution does not decrease morbidity significantly.

Anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve plexus: relevance to head and neck cancer and atherosclerosis

The term spinal accessory nerve plexus may be defined as the spinal accessory nerve with all its intra- and extracranial connections to other nerves, principally cranial, cervical, and sympathetic. The term is not new. This review examines its applied anatomy in head and neck cancer and atherosclerosis. Over the centuries, general studies of neural and vascular anatomy and embryology formed a basis for the understanding upon which the plexus is described. During the past century, its anatomy and blood supply have come to be better understood. The importance of almost all of the plexus to head, neck, and upper extremity motor and sensory functions has come to be realized. Because of this understanding, surgical neck dissection has become progressively more conservative. This historical progression is traced. Even the most recent anatomic studies of the spinal accessory nerve plexus reveal configurations, new to many of us. They were probably known to classical anatomists, and not recorded in readily available literature, or not recorded at all. Human and comparative anatomic studies indicate that the composition of this plexus and its blood supply vary widely, even though within the same species their overall function is very nearly the same. Loss of any of these structures, then, may have very different consequences in different individuals. As a corollary to this statement, data are presented that the spinal accessory nerve itself need not be cut during surgical neck dissections for severe impairment to occur. In addition, data are presented supporting the theory that atherosclerosis by obstructing vessels to this plexus and its closely connected brachial plexus will very likely result in their ischemic dysfunction, often painful. Finally evidence, as well as theory, is stated concerning anatomic issues, methodology, outcome, and possible improvements in surgical procedures emphasizing conservatism.

Surgical anatomy of spinal accessory nerve: is trapezius functional deficit inevitable after division of the nerve?

The course of spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle, the innervation of the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles and the contributions from the cervical plexus were studied in 20 cadaveric dissections. The nerve was most vulnerable to iatrogenic injuries after leaving the sternocleidomastoid. Direct innervation of trapezius by cervical plexus branches was noted in five dissections, whereas connections between the cervical plexus and the spinal accessory nerve were observed in 19 dissections. These were usually under the sternocleidomastoid (proximal to the level of division of the nerve in nerve transfer procedures). Although the contribution from the cervical plexus to trapezius innervation is considered minimal, trapezius function can be protected in neurotization procedures by transecting the spinal accessory nerve distal to its branches to the upper position of trapezius.

Anatomy and blood supply of the lower four cranial and cervical nerves: relevance to surgical neck dissection

This study is a continuation of previous work searching for possible anatomic reasons to explain variable and usually unpredictable postoperative pain and dysfunction after the same nerve losses with similar neck dissection operations. The study consisted of dissections of 19 deceased unpreserved elderly subjects arterially injected with dyed latex. Of the 19 subjects, 14 had brain stem and cervical spinal cord dissections, and all had neck dissections. The findings suggested two possible anatomic reasons for the pain and dysfunction: (i) The intracranial anatomy of the lower four cranial nerves, the glossopharyngeal (IX), the vagus (X), the spinal accessory (XI), and the hypoglossal (XII), was just as variable as the previously reported peripheral spinal accessory nerve plexus; and (ii) Both the intracranial and neck dissections indicated that the blood supply to the lower four cranial and cervical nerves, particularly to the brachial plexus, could be impaired by atherosclerosis and/or neuroforaminal impingement or operative loss. This loss of blood supply theoretically could result in ischemia as another possible cause of postoperative pain and dysfunction. It is concluded that because of the potential importance of each nerve and vessel, often unknown at operation, it is very important to spare as many of them as possible to avoid subsequent painful impairment.

Characteristics of postradical neck pain syndrome: a report of 25 cases

The postradical neck pain syndrome has been briefly described in the literature, but detailed characterization has not been reported. To further define this syndrome, 25 patients with persistent pain for at least 1 month following neck dissection were evaluated. The sample consisted of 13 men and 12 women with moderate to severe pain ranging from 1 month to 27 years in duration. All patients had at least one type of neuropathic pain: spontaneous, continuous burning pain (81%), shooting pain (69%), and/or allodynia (88%). Neuropathic pain sites were within the distribution of the superficial cervical plexus (SCP). Regional myofascial pain was also common (72%). Seventeen patients agreed to undergo diagnostic local anesthetic injections. Ten of these patients had both neuropathic and somatic (myofascial) pain. Local anesthetic injection of the SCP temporarily eliminated all neuropathic pain in the 17 patients who underwent the procedure. The 10 patients who also had myofascial pain reported temporary relief of their somatic pain following myofascial trigger point injections (TPI). Criteria for the postradical neck pain syndrome are proposed: (1) persistent, nonprogressive neuropathic pain involving one or more branches of the SCP, which may be accompanied by (2) regional nonprogressive somatic pain associated with myofascial pain trigger points in head and neck muscles.

The posterior triangle and the painful shoulder: spinal accessory nerve injury

Forty-three cases of accessory nerve injury referred to the Peripheral Nerve Injury Unit have been reviewed. Accessory nerve injury results in a characteristic group of symptoms and signs. Referral for treatment is usually delayed, the average time being 11.3 months. Surgical treatment resulted in improvement of symptoms in almost all cases.

Iatrogenic accessory nerve injury

Accessory nerve injury produces considerable disability. The nerve is most frequently damaged as a complication of radical neck dissection, cervical lymph node biopsy and other surgical procedures. The problem is frequently compounded by a failure to recognise the error immediately after surgery when surgical repair has the greatest chance of success. We present cases which outline the risk of accessory nerve injury, the spectrum of clinical presentations and the problems produced by a failure to recognise the deficit. Regional anatomy, consequences of nerve damage and management options are discussed. Diagnostic biopsy of neck nodes should not be undertaken as a primary investigation and, when indicated, surgery in this region should be performed by suitably trained staff under well-defined conditions. Awareness of iatrogenic injury and its consequences would avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Lateral exposure of the cervicothoracic spine for anterior decompression and osteosynthesis

A lateral exposure of the cervicothoracic spine by an approach giving access to the anterolateral aspect of the vertebral bodies between C3-T10 is described. The approach of that region is obtained by the association of a cervicotomy and a standard thoracotomy with a costal flap situated at the place of the scapula. This approach was used for one patient with tumor invasion in the anterior part of the spinal canal on T1-T3; it allowed extensive resection of the three successive metastatic vertebral bodies and permitted stabilization of the spine.