The cause of dysphagia in uncomplicated sliding hiatal hernia and its relief by hiatal herniorrhaphy. A roentgenographic, manometric, and clinical study

Dysphagia: Thinking outside the box

Dysphagia is a common symptom that is important to recognise and appropriately manage, given that causes include life threatening oesophageal neoplasia, oropharyngeal dysfunction, the risk of aspiration, as well as chronic disabling gastroesophageal reflux (GORD). The predominant causes of dysphagia varies between cohorts depending on the interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors, and is changing with time. Currently in white Caucasian societies adopting a western lifestyle, obesity is common and thus associated gastroesophageal reflux disease is increasingly diagnosed. Similarly, food allergies are increasing in the west, and eosinophilic oesophagitis is increasingly found as a cause. Other regions where cigarette smoking is still prevalent, or where access to medical care and antisecretory agents such as proton pump inhibitors are less available, benign oesophageal peptic strictures, Barrett's oesophagus, adeno- as well as squamous cell carcinoma are endemic. The evaluation should consider the severity of symptoms, as well as the pre-test probability of a given condition. In young white Caucasian males who are atopic or describe heartburn, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease will predominate and a proton pump inhibitor could be commenced prior to further investigation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains a valid first line investigation for patients with suspected oesophageal dysphagia. Barium swallow is particularly useful for oropharyngeal dysphagia, and oesophageal manometry mandatory to diagnose motility disorders.

Hiatus Hernia as a Cause of Dysphagia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss the putative relationship between hiatus hernia and dysphagia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Proposed mechanisms of dysphagia in patients with hiatus hernia are usually difficult to identify, but recent advances in technology (high-resolution manometry with or without concomitant impedance, ambulatory pH with impedance, videofluoroscopy, and the endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP)) and methodology (inclusion of swallows of various consistencies and volumes or shifting position during the manometry protocol) can help induce symptoms and identify the underlying disorder. Chronic reflux disease is often associated with hiatus hernia and is the most common underlying etiology. Dysmotility because of impaired contractility and vigor can occur as a consequence of repeated acid exposure from the acid pocket within the hernia, and the resultant poor clearance subsequently worsens this insult. As such, dysphagia appears to be more common with increasing hiatus hernia size. Furthermore, mucosal inflammation can lead to fibrotic stricture formation and in turn obstruction. On the other hand, there appears to be a difference in the pathophysiology of smaller sliding hernias, in that those with dysphagia are more likely to have extrinsic compression at the crural diaphragm as compared to those with reflux symptoms only. Sliding hiatus hernia, especially when small, does not commonly lead to dysmotility and dysphagia; however, in those patients with symptoms, the underlying etiology can be sought with new technologies and, in particular, the reproduction of normal eating and drinking during testing.

Achalasia: It Is Not All Black and White

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to shed light on subtleties of achalasia diagnosis, including potential pitfalls that may lead to errors. Optimal methods for assessment of disease severity and the relationship between achalasia and other motility disorders will also be reviewed with an emphasis on recent findings from the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adjunctive testing with viscous substances or larger water volumes should be used routinely as it improves the accuracy of achalasia diagnosis. Chronic opiate use can mimic achalasia. The timed barium swallow remains the best test for assessments of disease severity and prognostication, but the functional lumen-imaging probe, a newer tool which measures esophagogastric junction distensibility using impedance planimetry, is emerging as a potentially more powerful tool for these purposes. Functional esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction is possibly part of the achalasia spectrum. By addressing the potential pitfalls described, and through routine and standardized use of the diagnostic tools mentioned herein, the accuracy of diagnosis, severity assessment, and prognostication of achalasia can be improved.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in type 2 diabetics: symptom load and pathophysiologic aspects - a retro-pro study

Background

Information about gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2D) is scarce, although the incidence of both disorders is increasing.

We aimed to determine GERD symptoms and their underlying pathophysiologic characteristics in T2D patients.

Methods

This “retro-pro” study compared 65 T2D patients to a control group of 130 age- and sex-matched non-diabetics. GERD was confirmed by gastroscopy, manometry, pH-metry and barium swallow.

Results

In patients with T2D compared to controls, dysphagia (32.3% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.001) and globus sensation (27.7% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.021) were found more frequently, whereas heartburn (76.9% vs. 88.5%; p = 0.046) and regurgitation (47.7% vs. 72.3%; p = 0.001) were predominant in non-diabetics. Despite higher body mass indices (31.1 ± 5.2 vs. 27.7 ± 3.7 kg/m²; p < 0.001), hiatal hernia was less frequent in T2D patients compared to controls (60.0% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.001). Lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was higher in patients with T2D (median 10.0 vs. 7.2 mmHg, p = 0.016). DeMeester scores did not differ between the groups. Helicobacter pylori infections were more common in T2D patients (26.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.001). Barrett metaplasia (21.5% vs. 17.7%), as well as low- (10.8% vs. 3.8%) and high-grade dysplasia (1.5% vs. 0%) were predominant in T2D patients.

Conclusions

T2D patients exhibit different GERD symptoms, higher LES pressures and a decreased prevalence of hiatal hernia than non-diabetics, which may be related to worse oesophageal motility and, thus, a more functional rather than anatomical cause of GERD. Low-grade dysplasia was more than twice as high in T2D than in non-diabetics patients.

Trial registration

Ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, IRB number 720/2011.

Early experiences of minimally invasive surgery to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease

Purpose

There are fewer patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Korea compared with Western countries. The incidence of GERD has increased in recent years however, concerning many physicians. Here, we report our early experiences of using a recently introduced method of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for the treatment of GERD in Korean patients.

Methods

Fifteen patients with GERD were treated using antireflux surgery between May 2009 and February 2012 at the University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with 360° wrapping was performed on all patients.

Results

Eleven male and four female patients were evaluated and treated with an average age of 58.1 ± 14.1 years. The average surgical time was 118.9 ± 45.1 minutes, and no complications presented during surgery. After surgery, the reflux symptoms of each patient were resolved; only two patients developed transient dysphagia, which resolved within one month. One patient developed a 6-cm hiatal hernia that had to be repaired and reinforced using mesh.

Conclusion

The use of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of GERD is safe and feasible. It is also an efficacious method for controlling the symptoms of GERD in Korean patients. However, the use of this surgery still needs to be standardized (e.g., type of surgery, bougienage size, wrap length) and the long-term outcomes need to be evaluated.

Diagnosis of Type-I hiatal hernia: a comparison of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy

Sliding Type-I hiatal hernia is commonly diagnosed using upper endoscopy, barium swallow or less commonly, esophageal manometry. Current data suggest that endoscopy is superior to barium swallow or esophageal manometry. Recently, high-resolution manometry has become available for the assessment of esophageal motility. This novel technology is capable of displaying spatial and topographic pressure profiles of gastroesophageal junction and crural diaphragm in real time. The objective of the current study was to compare the specificity and sensitivity of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy in the diagnosis of sliding hiatal hernia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Data were analyzed retrospectively for 83 consecutive patients (61% females, mean age 52 ± 13.2 years) with objective gastroesophageal reflux disease who were considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery between January 2006 and January 2009 and had preoperative high-resolution manometry and endoscopy. Manometrically, hiatal hernia was defined as separation of the gastroesophageal junction >2.0 cm from the crural diaphragm. Intraoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia was used as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of a positive test and a negative test were used to compare the performance of the two diagnostic modalities. Forty-two patients were found to have a Type-I sliding hiatal hernia (>2 cm) during surgery. Twenty-two patients had manometric criteria for a hiatal hernia by high-resolution manometry, and 36 patients were described as having a hiatal hernia by preoperative endoscopy. False positive results were significantly fewer (higher specificity) with high-resolution manometry as compared with endoscopy (4.88% vs. 31.71%, P= 0.01). There were no significant differences in the false negative results (sensitivity) between the two diagnostic modalities (47.62% vs. 45.24%, P= 0.62). Analysis of likelihood ratios of a positive and negative test demonstrated that high-resolution manometry is better than endoscopy both to rule out and rule in a hiatal hernia. A significant discordance was also observed between the two tests (P= 0.033). High-resolution manometry has better specificity and ability to rule out an overt Type-I sliding hiatal hernia (greater likelihood ratio of a positive test) in patients with GERD. Because of high false negative results, both high-resolution manometry and endoscopy are unreliable for ruling in a hiatal hernia. Negative result for a hiatal hernia by either modality mandates additional testing.

Unique features of esophagogastric junction pressure topography in hiatus hernia patients with dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to assess pressure dynamics within the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in sliding hiatus hernia (HH) during normal peristalsis and to compare the pressure profiles of HH patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (HH-GERD) to HH patients with dysphagia (HH-dysphagia).

METHODS

High-resolution manometry studies in 230 consecutive patients and 68 controls were reviewed. HH patients were defined by a >or=1.5 cm separation between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) on pressure topography plots. The HH population was further culled to eliminate those patients with motor disorders or stricture. The study groups were composed of 18 HH patients with only reflux symptoms and 10 HH patients with only dysphagia. Analysis of the pressure dynamics within the EGJ was performed at rest and after swallowing to independently quantify the LES and CD contributions to residual EGJ pressure, as well as the magnitude and genesis of distal esophageal intrabolus pressure (IBP). Differences among study groups were analyzed with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

After swallows, HH-dysphagia patients had greater residual CD pressure (9 mmHg; standard deviation [SD], 4) and IBP pressure (19 mmHg; SD, 4) compared to HH-GERD patients (5 mmHg; SD, 2; and 12 mmHg; SD, 2, respectively; P<.001) or normal subjects (NA; 11 mmHg; SD, 3; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Sliding HH alters the pressure dynamics through the EGJ and can lead to a functional obstruction. Patients with HH and dysphagia have greater pressures through the CD compared to HH patients with GERD symptoms, supporting the hypothesis that sliding HH in and of itself may be responsible for dysphagia.

The use of medication after laparoscopic antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) significantly improves symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and quality of life. Nevertheless, 14-62% of patients report using antisecretory medication after surgery, although only a tiny percentage has proven recurrence of GERD. We sought to determine symptoms of GERD, quality of life, and use of medication before and after LARS, and to compare our findings with those from previous studies.

METHODS

Five hundred fifty-three patients with GERD who underwent LARS were evaluated before and at 1 year after surgery. After surgery, multidisciplinary follow-up care was provided for all patients by surgeons, psychologists, dieticians, and speech therapists.

RESULTS

Symptoms of GERD and quality of life improved significantly and only 4.2% of patients still required medication after surgery [proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (98.4 vs. 2.2%; p < 0.01), prokinetics (9.6 vs. 1.1%; p < 0.01), and psychiatric medication (8 vs. 1.6%; p < 0.01)].

CONCLUSION

LARS significantly reduced medication use at 1-year follow-up. However, these effects might be attributed, in part, to the multidisciplinary follow-up care. Further studies are therefore required to investigate which patients may benefit from multidisciplinary follow-up care and whether its selective application may reduce the need for medication after LARS.

Quality of life in GERD patients: medical treatment versus antireflux surgery

Medical and surgical treatments are able to improve symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome in GERD patients without therapy, under continuous medical treatment, and after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Five hundred seventy-nine consecutive patients underwent medical or surgical treatment for GERD-induced symptoms. Patients were studied in detail before and after treatment by means of a symptom questionnaire, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and a barium esophagogram. In addition, quality of life was measured by the means of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaire. Surgery was indicated and performed in 351 patients with persistent or recurrent GERD symptoms and/or complications, and in patients preferring surgery to medical treatment, despite the use of an adequate medication. The remaining 228 patients were treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in the standard dose, or if required, the double dose. The outcome was assessed 3 and 12 months after treatment. While symptoms and quality of life were highly impaired in GERD patients without therapy compared with normal people, a significant improvement was obtained by PPI therapy. Following surgery, quality of life was normalized in all subsections and was significantly higher compared with the medically treated group. These results stayed constant in short-term and intermediate follow-up. Medical and surgical therapies are both able to improve symptoms and quality of life in GERD patients. Nevertheless, the outcome is significantly better following surgery. It can be suggested that surgical treatment may be the more successful therapy in the long-term.

Evaluation of esophageal function for antireflux surgery

Antireflux surgery has become well established as an effective and durable therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. The outcome of antireflux surgery, however, is only as good as the evaluation to document the association between pathologic esophageal acid exposure and the patient's symptoms. This article discusses the well-established diagnostic modalities used to assess foregut structure and function and includes several more sophisticated secondary studies that may aid the clinician in elucidating the cause of the problem in patients in whom standard testing is inadequate.

Minimally invasive approaches to antireflux surgery

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most common disorders affecting western civilization. Historically, surgical antireflux therapy was reserved for patients who had failed medical therapy, typically in the presence of refractory ulcers or difficult-to-manage strictures. More recently, with improvements in acid control, these acid-pepsin-related complications of reflux have been replaced by the malignant complications of reflux disease, with emphasis now on total control of reflux. Recent developments in surgical technique and the demonstrated effectiveness of a variety of minimally invasive treatment options have changed our approach to these patients. This article summarizes the recommended diagnostic evaluation of patients with reflux symptoms and the current indications for antireflux surgery. The techniques of commonly performed minimally invasive antireflux procedures are described along with a review of the results to be expected. Future prospects for improving the management of reflux are discussed; these include recently described nonsurgical methods for restoring competency to the lower esophageal sphincter.

Prospective study of symptoms and gastro-oesophageal reflux 10 years after posterior partial fundoplication

BACKGROUND

This was a prospective study of symptoms, and short-term and long-term reflux competence after partial fundoplication.

METHODS

Some 101 patients were operated consecutively with posterior partial (270 degrees ) fundoplication. Indications for surgery were reflux disease without erosive oesophagitis in 25 patients, moderate oesophagitis in 43, severe oesophagitis in 25 and paraoesophageal hernia in eight. Symptom score, manometry and pH tests were performed before operation, 6 months after operation and after 6-14 years.

RESULTS

All patients (n = 101) were free from heartburn and regurgitation at early follow-up. There was evidence of clinical recurrence at late follow-up (n = 87) in two of 22 patients without oesophagitis before operation, two of 39 with moderate oesophagitis before operation and three of 19 patients with severe oesophagitis before operation; 92 per cent had good reflux control at late follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Posterior partial fundoplication shows excellent reflux control at early follow-up. Ten years later fewer than 10 per cent of patients have recurrence, which is more common in patients who had severe oesophagitis before operation.

The effect of medical therapy and antireflux surgery on dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophageal stricture

BACKGROUND

Poor esophageal body motility and trapping of the hernial sac by the hiatal crura are the major pathomechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-induced dysphagia. There is only little knowledge of the effect of medical therapy or antireflux surgery in reflux-induced dysphagia.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive GERD patients with dysphagia were studied by means of a symptom questionnaire, endoscopy, barium swallow, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring of the esophagus. Patients had proton pump inhibitor therapy and cisapride for 6 months. After GERD relapsed following withdrawal of medical therapy, 41 patients decided to have antireflux surgery performed. The laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was chosen in 12 patients with normal esophageal body motility and the laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication in 29 patients with impaired peristalsis. Dysphagia was assessed prior to treatment, at 6 months of medical therapy, and at 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Heartburn and esophagitis were effectively treated by medical and surgical therapy. Only surgery improved regurgitation. Dysphagia improved in all patients following surgery but only in 16 patients (27.1%) following medical therapy. Esophageal peristalsis was strengthened following antireflux surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical therapy fails to control gastroesophageal reflux as it does not inhibit regurgitation. Thus, it has little effect on reflux-induced dysphagia. Surgery controls reflux and improves esophageal peristalsis. This may contribute to its superiority over medical therapy in the treatment of GERD-induced dysphagia.

Can pressure overload cause sliding hiatal hernia? A case report and review of the literature

We describe a hiatal hernia of moderate size in a 31-year-old competitive bodybuilder to raise the question of whether such hernias are more likely in young elite resistance-trained athletes as a consequence of attempts to increase intra-abdominal pressure and thus decrease the strain on the lumbar spine.

Who benefits from antireflux surgery?

Prior to any rational therapy of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, an objective diagnosis of the presence and the cause of the disease are necessary. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, i.e., increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice, can be due to a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter, inefficient esophageal clearance of refluxed gastric contents, and abnormalities of the gastric reservoir that augment physiologic reflux. Antireflux surgery is designed to correct a mechanically defective sphincter, i.e., a sphincter with a mean pressure below 6 mm Hg, a mean length exposed to the positive pressure environment of the abdomen of less than 1 cm, or a mean overall length of less than 2 cm. In our experience, this is found in approximately 50% to 60% of patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Antireflux surgery is not indicated in patients with increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice secondary to ineffective clearance or gastric abnormalities. Consequently, the indications to proceed with an antireflux procedure are persistent or recurrent symptoms and/or complications of gastro-esophageal reflux disease after 8 to 12 weeks of intensive acid suppression therapy, the objective documentation of increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice with 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring, and the presence of a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter on manometry. In patients selected according to these criteria, Nissen fundoplication provides effective relief of reflux symptoms in 91% of patients with more than 10 year follow-up.