Does carotid restenosis predict an increased risk of late symptoms, stroke, or death?

Correlation Between Risk Factors, Degree of Vascular Restenosis, and Inflammatory Factors After Interventional Treatment for Stroke: A Two-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation between risk factors, degree of vascular restenosis, and inflammatory factors after interventional treatment for stroke.

METHODS

The clinical data of 96 stroke patients who received interventional therapy in our hospital from April 2020 to June 2021 were selected for retrospective study, and the postoperative follow-up was 1 year. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to analyze identified factors associated with interventional stroke efficacy. At the same time, the value of inflammatory factor levels in predicting vascular restenosis after interventional stroke was analyzed.

RESULTS

According to our findings, several risk factors, including body mass index ≥ 25.51 kg/m 2 , smoking, drinking, hypertension, and diabetes, were identified as contributors to poor postoperative efficacy following stroke intervention ( P <0.05). Furthermore, a notable association was observed between the severity of vascular stenosis ( P <0.001) and the levels of interleukin 6, interleukin 2, TNF-α, and C-reactive protein. The combined assessment of these serum inflammatory factors exhibited excellent predictive capability for postoperative vascular restenosis and stenosis severity, yielding a sensitivity of 84.30%, a specificity of 81.20%, and an area under the curve of 0.882.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and diabetes have been found to be associated with suboptimal outcomes following interventional treatment for stroke. The assessment of preoperative levels of inflammatory factors holds promise in predicting the likelihood of postoperative restenosis to a certain degree.

Eversion technique versus traditional carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis

Introduction

The use of an 'eversion' technique is not unequivocally proven to be superior to carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. An up-to-date systematic review is needed for evaluation of benefits and harms of these two techniques.

Methods

RCTs comparing eversion technique versus endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in patients with a symptomatic and significant (≥50 %) stenosis of the internal carotid artery were enrolled. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality rate, health-related quality of life and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included 30-day stroke and mortality rate, (a) symptomatic arterial occlusion or restenosis, and adverse events not critical for decision making.

Results

Four RCTs were included with 1272 surgical procedures for carotid stenosis; eversion technique n = 643 and carotid endarterectomy with patch closure n = 629. Meta-analysis comparing both techniques showed, with a very low certainty of evidence, that eversion technique might decrease the number of patients with serious adverse events (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.64; p ≤ 0.01). However, no difference was found on the other outcomes. TSA demonstrated that the required information sizes were far from being reached for these patient-important outcomes. All patient-relevant outcomes were at low certainty of evidence according to GRADE.

Conclusions

This systematic review showed no conclusive evidence of any difference between eversion technique and carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in carotid surgery. These conclusions are based on data obtained in trials with very low certainty according to GRADE and should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Until conclusive evidence is obtained, the standard of care according to ESVS guidelines should not be abandoned.

Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid patch angioplasty may reduce the risk of acute occlusion or long-term restenosis of the carotid artery and subsequent ischaemic stroke in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This is an update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 1995 and updated in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty with either a venous patch or a synthetic patch compared with primary closure in people undergoing CEA. We wished to test the primary hypothesis that carotid patch angioplasty results in a lower rate of severe arterial restenosis and therefore fewer recurrent strokes and stroke-related deaths, without a considerable increase in perioperative complications.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trial registries in September 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials comparing carotid patch angioplasty with primary closure in people undergoing CEA.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias; extracted data; and determined the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Outcomes of interest included stroke, death, significant complications related to surgery, and artery restenosis or occlusion during the perioperative period (within 30 days of the operation) or during long-term follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 trials involving 2100 participants undergoing 2304 CEA operations. The quality of trials was generally poor. Follow-up varied from hospital discharge to five years. Compared with primary closure, carotid patch angioplasty may make little or no difference to reduction in risk of any stroke during the perioperative period (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 1.03; P = 0.063; 8 studies, 1769 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but may lower the risk of any stroke during long-term follow-up (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.90; P = 0.022; 7 studies, 1332 participants; very low-certainty evidence). In the included studies, carotid patch angioplasty resulted in a lower risk of ipsilateral stroke during the perioperative period (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.63; P = 0.001; 7 studies, 1201 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and during long-term follow-up (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.63; P = 0.001; 6 studies, 1141 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The intervention was associated with a reduction in the risk of any stroke or death during long-term follow-up (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.84; P = 0.003; 6 studies, 1019 participants; very low-certainty evidence). In addition, the included studies suggest that carotid patch angioplasty may reduce the risk of perioperative arterial occlusion (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.41; P < 0.0001; 7 studies, 1435 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may reduce the risk of restenosis during long-term follow-up (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.34; P < 0.00001; 8 studies, 1719 participants; low-certainty evidence). The studies recorded very few arterial complications, including haemorrhage, infection, cranial nerve palsies and pseudo-aneurysm formation, with either patch or primary closure. We found no correlation between the use of patch angioplasty and the risk of either perioperative or long-term stroke-related death or all-cause death rates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with primary closure, carotid patch angioplasty may reduce the risk of perioperative arterial occlusion and long-term restenosis of the operated artery. It would appear to reduce the risk of ipsilateral stroke during the perioperative and long-term period and reduce the risk of any stroke in the long-term when compared with primary closure. However, the evidence is uncertain due to the limited quality of included trials.

Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Patch angioplasty in conventional carotid endarterectomy is suggested to reduce the risk of restenosis and recurrent ipsilateral stroke compared with primary closure. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials is needed to compare outcomes (benefits and harms) of both techniques.

METHODS

Searches (CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases) were last updated 3rd of January 2021. We included randomized clinical trials comparing carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure of the arterial wall in patients with a symptomatic and significant (> 50%) carotid stenosis. Primary outcomes are defined as all-cause mortality and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

We included 12 randomized clinical trials including 2187 participants who underwent 2335 operations for carotid stenosis comparing carotid endarterectomy with patch closure (1280 operations) versus carotid endarterectomy with primary closure (1055 operations). Meta-analysis comparing carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy with primary closure may potentially decrease the number of patients with all-cause mortality (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.08; p = 0.08, best-case scenario for patch), serious adverse events (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96; p = 0.02, best-case scenario for patch), and the number of restenosis (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.71; p < 0.01). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the required information sizes were far from being reached for these patient-important outcomes. All the patient-relevant outcomes were at low certainty of evidence according to The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review showed no conclusive evidence of a difference between carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure of the arterial wall on all-cause mortality, < 30 days mortality, < 30 days stroke, or any other serious adverse events. These conclusions are based on data from 15 to 35 years ago, obtained in trials with very low certainty according to GRADE, and should be interpreted cautiously. Therefore, we suggest conducting new randomized clinical trials patch angioplasty versus primary closure in carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with an internal carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more. Such trials ought to be designed according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement (Chan et al., Ann Intern Med 1:200-7, 2013) and reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement (Schulz et al., 7, 2010). Until conclusive evidence is obtained, the standard of care according to guidelines should not be abandoned.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42014013416 . Review protocol publication 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026419 .

Eversion technique versus conventional endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in carotid surgery: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Traditional carotid endarterectomy is considered to be the standard technique for prevention of a new stroke in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis. Use of patch angioplasty to restore the arterial wall after longitudinal endarterectomy is, to date, not unequivocally proven to be superior to eversion technique. A systematic review is needed for evaluation of benefits and harms of the eversion technique versus the traditional endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

The review will be conducted according to this protocol following the recommendations of the 'Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews' and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Randomised clinical trials comparing eversion technique versus endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in patients with a symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery will be included. Primary outcomes are all-cause mortality rate, health-related quality of life and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes are 30-day stroke and mortality rate, symptomatic arterial restenosis or occlusion and non-serious adverse events. The databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE will be searched (November 2019). We will primarily base our conclusions on meta-analyses of trials with overall low-risk of bias. We will use trial sequential analysis to assist the evaluation of imprecision in Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. However, if pooled point estimates of all trials are similar to pooled point estimates of trials with overall low risk of bias and there is lack of a statistical significant interaction between estimates from trials with overall high risk of bias and trials with overall low risk of bias we will consider the trial sequential analysis adjusted precision of the estimate achieved in all trials as the result of our meta-analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The proposed systematic review will collect and analyse data from published studies, therefore, ethical approval is not required. The results of the review will be disseminated by publication in a peer-review journal and submitted for presentation at conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019119361.

Carotid endarterectomy with primary closure versus patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Use of patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is suggested to reduce the risk of restenosis and recurrent ipsilateral stroke. The objective is to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis as well as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments comparing the benefits and harms of CEA with primary closure of the arterial wall versus CEA with patch angioplasty in patients with a symptomatic and significant carotid stenosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The review shall be conducted according to this published protocol following the recommendations of the 'Cochrane' and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Randomised clinical trials comparing CEA with primary closure of the arterial wall versus CEA with patch angioplasty (regardless of used patch materials) in human adults with a symptomatic and significant carotid stenosis will be included. Primary outcomes are all-cause mortality at maximal follow-up, health-related quality of life and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes are symptomatic or asymptomatic arterial occlusion or restenosis, and non-serious adverse events. We will primarily base our conclusions on meta-analyses of trials with overall low risk of bias. However, if pooled point estimates of all trials are similar to pooled point estimates of trials with overall low risk of bias and there is lack of a statistical significant interaction between estimates from trials with overall high risk of bias and trials with overall low risk of bias we will consider the precision achieved in all trials as the result of our meta-analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The proposed systematic review will collect and analyse secondary data from published studies therefor ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be disseminated by publication in a peer-review journal and submitted for presentation at relevant conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42014013416.

A systematic review of patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend routine patching after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on the basis of a lower restenosis rate and presumed lower procedural stroke rate than with primary repair. Underlying evidence is based on studies performed decades ago with perioperative care that significantly differed from current standards. Recent studies raise doubt about routine patching and have suggested that a more selective approach to patch closure (PAC) might be noninferior for procedural safety and long-term stroke prevention. The objective was to review the literature on the procedural safety and perioperative stroke prevention of PAC compared with primary closure (PRC) after CEA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from January 1966 to September 2017. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, assessment of methodologic quality, and data extraction. Articles were eligible if they compared PAC and PRC after CEA, were published in English, included human studies, and had a full text available. Methodologic quality for nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score; randomized controlled trials were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Nonrandomized studies with a score ≤15 were excluded. The primary outcome measure was 30-day stroke risk. Secondary outcome measures were long-term restenosis (>50%) and postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria, 9 randomized studies and 20 nonrandomized studies, for a total of 12,696 patients and 13,219 CEAs. Overall 30-day stroke risk was higher in the PRC group (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9). After exclusion of nonrandomized studies, this difference was not statistically significant anymore (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.8-3.9). The restenosis rate was higher after PRC (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4). There were no differences in bleeding complications. Methodologic quality of the nonrandomized studies was moderate, and seven were excluded. Quality of the evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was moderate for restenosis, 30-day stroke, and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, on the basis of moderate-quality evidence, perioperative stroke rate was lower after PAC compared with PRC. The rate of restenosis was higher after PRC, although the clinical significance of this finding in terms of long-term stroke prevention remained unclear.

Treatment of Recurrent Carotid Disease

The purpose of this study was to determine whether repeat carotid endarterectomy (CEA) poses a greater risk than first-time CEA. The authors analyzed data from 893 consecutive CEA cases (1981-1993). Thirty-three patients (3.7%) had repeat CEA, and 860 (96.3%) had first-time CEA. There were statistically significantly higher incidences of hypertension (60.6% vs 44.6%), smoking (84.8% vs 55%), hypertriglyceridemia (33.3% vs 16.2%), and coronary artery disease (66.6% vs 36%) in the repeat CEA group than in the first-time CEA group.

Symptomatic disease was present in 25 (75.8%) patients in the repeat group and in 576 (67%) patients in the first-time group (P>0.05). The cause of recurrence was atherosclerosis in 25 patients (76%), myointimal hyperplasia in seven patients (21.2%), and intraluminal thrombus without an underlying lesion in one patient (3%). Redo CEA with vein patch angioplasty was performed in 27 patients (82%), vein patch angioplasty alone in five patients (15%), and interposition vein graft in one patient (3%).

The hospital operative mortality was 0% (n=0) in the repeat CEA group and 0.6% (n=5) in the first-time CEA group (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative stroke was 0% (n=0) in the repeat group and 1.2% (n= 10) in the first-time group (P>0.05). There was one case (3%) of transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the repeat group, and two cases (0.2%) of TIA in the first-time group. There was no difference in the incidence of cranial nerve dysfunction between the repeat group (n=2, 6%) and the first-time group (n=41, 4.8%; P>0.05). Late follow-up data were obtained for 30 patients (mean: 61.4 months, range: 5-158 months) in the repeat CEA group and 501 patients (mean: 55.8 months, range: 17-168 months) in the first-time CEA group. The incidence of late failure (ipsilateral stroke or TIA) was 3.3% (n= 1) in the repeat group and 3.2% (n= 16) in the firsttime CEA group; P>0.05. The overall late mortality was 20% (n=6) in the repeat CEA group and 14.6% (n=73) in the primary CEA group; P>0.05.

Repeat CEA can be performed safely in individuals with severe recurrent carotid stenosis, and perioperative and long-term mortality and neurologic morbidity rates are similar to those for patients undergoing first-time carotid endarterectomy.

The Role of Endovascular Surgery in Carotid Restenosis

Purpose:

To report the immediate and long-term outcome of intraoperative balloon angioplasty for the treatment of recurrent disease in the internal carotid arteries (ICAs).

Methods:

Three patients (2 males, 1 female; ages 53 to 70 years) presented with > 80% restenotic lesions (bilateral in one patient) at the distal aspect of a previous carotid endarterectomy. Two patients exhibited hemianopia, while the third was asymptomatic but had a contralateral ICA occlusion. All four lesions appeared smooth and fibrous on ultrasonography and were located high in the ICA. The location and morphology of the lesions made balloon angioplasty a more potentially successful treatment option.

Results:

Through open access to the common carotid artery, the lesions were approached and dilated under fluoroscopic guidance with monitoring of evoked potentials. The lesions were successfully dilated as determined by control arteriography, and no complications were encountered. Over a follow-up period extending to 18 months in one patient and 24 months in the other two, ultrasound imaging and arteriography have shown no restenosis at any treatment site.

Conclusions:

Although caution is prudent when dealing with lesions in the cervical arteries, balloon angioplasty may have a role in treating surgically in accessible restenotic carotid lesions that demonstrate a low potential for embolic complications. More experience with this technique will be required before widespread application of balloon angioplasty in the cervical vessels can occur.

Recurrent Carotid Disease: Will Stents Be an Alternative to Surgery?

Purpose:

To report the results of balloon angioplasty in recurrent carotid occlusive disease and evaluate the potential for stent implantation.

Methods and Results:

Between April 1991 and September 1995, 15 patients with carotid restenosis underwent 17 endoluminal procedures in 3 common carotid and 14 internal carotid arteries. Two postdilation complications (dissection and acute occlusion) required prompt stenting; one common carotid artery was stented for postdilation residual stenosis. One recurrent lesion was also stented 6 months after initial angioplasty. One stroke, 1 silent cerebral infarction, and 3 transient ischemic attacks occurred in the balloon angioplasty patients (33% neurological complication rate). The common carotid stent patient died 3 days postoperatively due to hyperperfusion syndrome. Long-term follow-up in two stent patients showed no restenosis at 18 and 48 months, respectively. The 11 balloon angioplasty patients likewise have not demonstrated restenosis.

Conclusions:

Balloon angioplasty alone appears too risky for treating recurrent carotid disease. Stents may offer a safer alternative, particularly when implanted primarily.

Management of extracranial carotid artery disease

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in developed nations. Up to 88% of strokes are ischemic in nature. Extracranial carotid artery atherosclerotic disease is the third leading cause of ischemic stroke in the general population and the second most common nontraumatic cause among adults younger than 45 years. This article provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for the management of extracranial atherosclerotic disease, including imaging for screening and diagnosis, medical management, and interventional management.

Spontaneous regression of restenosis after CEA: significance of preoperative plaque characteristics under duplex ultrasound; clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

Restenosis is a postoperative complication after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The natural clinical course of restenotic lesions is not yet fully understood. This study was aimed at detecting the pattern of restenotic lesions by way of following the plaque thickness under duplex ultrasound, and the possible relationship between the postoperative changes of restenotic lesions and the preoperative plaque characteristics.

METHOD

Serial duplex ultrasound follow-up studies were conducted postoperatively, and intima-media thickness (IMT) was measured to detect restenosis changes. Among 381 cases of CEA, including 25 cases of restenosis, 11 were eligible for further analysis.

FINDINGS

Of the 11 cases of restenosis, four showed a gradual increase in IMT, and five showed a temporary increase followed by a decrease in IMT. All cases in the former group showed isoechogenic or hypoechogenic plaques under preoperative duplex ultrasound. In contrast, all cases in the latter group demonstrated calcified plaques together with acoustic shadows.

CONCLUSIONS

These postoperative chronological IMT data demonstrate two changing patterns of restenosis, implying the existence of two distinct entities. In addition, these results suggest that restenosis after removal of a calcified plaque, which supposedly forms secondary to myointimal hyperplasia, may be a temporary phenomenon that acutely develops in response to a dissection maneuver during surgery. Because our speculation is based on a small number of cases, further study is warranted to better understand the pathophysiology of restenosis regression.

The current role of carotid duplex ultrasonography in the management of carotid atherosclerosis: foundations and advances

The management of atherosclerotic carotid occlusive disease for stroke prevention has entered a time of dramatic change. Improvements in medical management have begun to challenge traditional interventional approaches to asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Simultaneously, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CE). Finally, multiple factors beyond degree of stenosis and symptom status now mitigate clinical decision making. These factors include brain perfusion, plaque morphology, and patency of intracranial collaterals (circle of Willis). With all of these changes, it seems prudent to review the role of carotid duplex ultrasonography in the management of atherosclerotic carotid occlusive disease for stroke prevention. Carotid duplex ultrasonography (CDU) for initial and serial imaging of the carotid bifurcation remains an essential component in the management of carotid bifurcation disease. However, correlative axial imaging modalities (computer tomographic angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA)) increasingly aid in the assessment of individual stroke risk and are important in treatment decisions. The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to discuss foundations and advances in CDU and (2) to evaluate the current role of CDU, in light of other imaging modalities, in the clinical management of carotid atherosclerosis.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can reduce the risk of perioperative stroke or late carotid artery recurrent stenosis and subsequent ischaemic stroke. We aimed to update our previous systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty compared with CEA with primary closure, and of different materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

METHODS

We identified new RCTs published during 2002-2010 by searching Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register. We also hand-searched six relevant journals. Pooled estimates of treatment effects combined with our previous review (1966-2001) were calculated on the basis of a weighted estimate of the odds ratio (OR) with the Peto method.

RESULTS

Twenty-three eligible RCTs were identified in both periods. Ten RCTs involving 2,157 operations compared primary closure with routine patch closure. Patch closure significantly reduced the combined risk of perioperative stroke and later stroke during long-term follow-up [OR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.27-0.90, p = 0.001; 7 RCTs]. Patching also reduced the risks of perioperative arterial occlusion (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.08-0.41, p < 0.0001; 7 RCTs) and recurrent stenosis during long-term followup (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.17-0.34, p < 0.001; 8 RCTs).

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of relatively small RCTs suggests that carotid patch angioplasty reduces the combined perioperative and long-term risk of stroke and the risk of restenosis. More data are needed.

Carotid Endarterectomy With Primary Closure: Analysis of Outcomes and Review of the Literature

Background:

Despite abundant published support of patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), primary closure is still widely used. The reasons underlying the persistence of primary closure are not quite evident in the literature.

Objective:

To present our experience with primary closure in CEA, and provide a rationale for its persistent wide use.

Methods:

Medical records of all patients undergoing CEA by the senior author (R.F.) were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was supplemented with a telephone interview and completion of a structured questionnaire. A review of the current literature was performed.

Results:

From 1998 to 2010, the senior author performed 111 CEAs. Average cross-clamp time was 33 ± 11 minutes. Postoperative complications included 1 non– ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 2 strokes. No deaths, cranial-nerve deficits, or acute reocclusions were observed. After a mean follow-up of 64.6 months (7170.6 case-months), there were 3 contralateral strokes and 7 deaths. There were no ipsilateral strokes or restenoses &gt;50%. Follow-up medication compliance was 94.6% for anti-platelet agents and 91.9% for statins. The outcomes of the current study were comparable to those of the available trials comparing patch angioplasty with primary closure. A careful evaluation of the literature revealed a number of reasons potentially explaining the persistent use of patch angioplasty.

Conclusion:

In conjunction with contemporary medical management, primary closure during CEA may yield results comparable or superior to patch angioplasty. Advantages of primary closure include shorter cross-clamp times and elimination of graft-specific complications.

Mechanisms of gender-related outcome differences after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Large randomized trials have confirmed a difference in outcome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between men and women. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the gender-specific characteristics causing these perioperative and long-term outcome differences between men and women after CEA.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy with the synonyms of 'gender' and 'carotid endarterectomy' was conducted from PubMed and EMBASE databases. Only 11 relevant studies specifically discussing gender-specific related characteristics and their influence on outcome after CEA could be identified.

RESULTS

Due to the limited number of included studies, pooling of findings was impossible, and results are presented in a descriptive manner. Each included study described only one possible gender-specific factor. Differences in carotid artery diameter, sex hormones, sensitivity for antiplatelet therapy, plaque morphology, occurrence of microembolic signals, and restenosis rate have all been suggested as gender-specific characteristics influencing outcome after CEA.

CONCLUSION

Higher embolic potential in women and relatively stable female plaque morphology are the best-described factors influencing the difference in outcomes between men and women. However, the overall evidence for outcome differences by gender-specific characteristics in the literature is limited.

Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid patch angioplasty (with either a venous or a synthetic patch) may reduce the risk of carotid artery restenosis and subsequent ischaemic stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 1995 and previously updated in 2004.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty compared to carotid endarterectomy with primary closure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 5 May 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2008), EMBASE (1980 to November 2008) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to November 2008). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing carotid patch angioplasty with primary closure in any patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials involving 1967 patients undergoing 2157 operations. The quality of trials was generally poor. Follow up varied from hospital discharge to five years. Carotid patch angioplasty was associated with a reduction in the risk of ipsilateral stroke during the perioperative period (odds ratio (OR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.63, P = 0.001) and long-term follow up (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.63, P = 0.001). It was also associated with a reduced risk of perioperative arterial occlusion (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.41, P < 0.0001), and decreased restenosis during long-term follow up in eight trials (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.34, P < 0.00001). These results are more certain than those of the previous review since the number of operations and events have increased. However, the sample sizes are still relatively small, data were not available from all trials, and there was significant loss to follow up. Very few arterial complications, including haemorrhage, infection, cranial nerve palsies and pseudo-aneurysm formation were recorded with either patch or primary closure. No significant correlation was found between use of patch angioplasty and the risk of either perioperative or long-term all-cause death rates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence suggests that carotid patch angioplasty may reduce the risk of perioperative arterial occlusion and restenosis. It would appear to reduce the risk of ipsilateral stroke and there is a non significant trend towards a reduction in perioperative any stroke rate and all-cause case fatality.

Carotid artery stenting: findings based on 8 years' experience

PURPOSE

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be an alternative to surgical endarterectomy not only in high-risk patients. Few data are available regarding the long-term clinical efficacy of CAS with the use of cerebral protection devices and the incidence of restenosis. Our experience demonstrates that if certain requirements are fulfilled, CAS can be considered a safe and effective treatment with high short-and long-term success rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the past 8 years, we treated 1,003 patients (1,096 arteries) affected by internal carotid artery stenosis, 93 with bilateral stenosis. Of these, 567 (51.74%) were symptomatic and 529 (48.26%) asymptomatic lesions. The preprocedural evaluation was performed with Doppler ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance (MR) angiography/computed tomography (CT) angiography and a neurological evaluation. Antiplatelet therapy was administered before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 1,092 cases (99.6%), and a cerebral protection device was successfully used in 1,019 procedures (92.9%). The 30-day transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke/death rate was 2.16%: death (0.18%) major stroke (0.45%) and minor stroke/TIA (1.53%). During a follow-up up to 8 years, restenoses occurred in 39 cases (3.57%), of which 28 were post-CAS (2.57%) and 11 post-CAS performed for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (1%). Only five symptomatic restenoses>80% were treated with a repeated endovascular procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

A retrospective analysis of our experience suggests that CAS is a safe and effective procedure with better results than endarterectomy. In up to 8 years of follow-up, CAS seems to be effective in preventing stroke, with a low restenosis rate.

Clinical validation of an automated vessel-segmentation software of the extracranial-carotid arteries based on 3D-MRA: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of automated vessel-segmentation software for vessel-diameter measurements based on three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3D-MRA).

METHOD

In 10 patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, automated measurements of both carotid arteries were obtained with 3D-MRA by two independent investigators and compared with manual measurements obtained by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 2D maximum-intensity projection (2D-MIP) based on MRA and duplex ultrasonography (US). In 42 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), intraoperative measurements (IOP) were compared with postoperative 3D-MRA and US.

RESULTS

Mean interoperator variability was 8% for measurements by DSA and 11% by 2D-MIP, but there was no interoperator variability with the automated 3D-MRA analysis. Good correlations were found between DSA (standard of reference), manual 2D-MIP (rP=0.6) and automated 3D-MRA (rP=0.8). Excellent correlations were found between IOP, 3D-MRA (rP=0.93) and US (rP=0.83).

CONCLUSION

Automated 3D-MRA-based vessel segmentation and quantification result in accurate measurements of extracerebral-vessel dimensions.

Procedural outcome and midterm result of carotid stenting in high-risk patients

Carotid endarterectomy is the standard treatment for carotid stenosis, but carotid artery stenting has emerged as a potential alternative. Elective carotid artery stenting was performed in 42 patients aged 42 to 79 years (mean, 67.05 +/- 8.67 years) after ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and a neurological evaluation. There was bilateral carotid stenosis in 23 patients (55%), with > 90% stenosis in 18 vessels. All patients had significant associated coronary lesions. An emboli protection device and self-expanding stents were used. One year later, the patients were evaluated by Doppler sonography and selective angiography. Technical success was achieved in all procedures. During follow-up, 1 (2.4%) patient died from myocardial infarction, 1 underwent coronary artery bypass and 14 (40%) had minor complaints including occasional dizziness. No other neurological events were noted. Restenosis was found in one case, but selective angiography ruled out a significant lesion. One patient suffered embolization, but recovered completely within 24 hours. In 7 (17%) patients with type C arch interruption and a tortuous carotid course, stenting was successful and they had no embolization or restenosis. Carotid artery stenting is recommended in high-risk patients.

Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) patients with carotid stenosis were randomized between endovascular treatment and endarterectomy. The rates of residual severe stenosis and restenosis and their contribution to recurrent symptoms was unclear.

METHODS

Endovascular patients were treated by balloon angioplasty alone (88%) or stenting (22%). Patches were used in 63% of endarterectomy patients. Carotid stenosis was categorized as mild (0% to 49%), moderate (50% to 69%), severe (70% to 99%), or occluded, using standardized Doppler ultrasound criteria at the examination closest to 1 month (n=283) and 1 year (n=347) after treatment. Recurrent cerebrovascular symptoms during follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

More patients had > or =70% stenosis of the ipsilateral carotid artery 1 year after endovascular treatment than after endarterectomy (18.5% versus 5.2%, P=0.0001). Residual severe stenosis was present in 6.5% of patients at 1 month after endovascular treatment. Between 1 month and 1 year, restenosis to > or =70% stenosis occurred in 10.5% of the endovascular group. After endarterectomy, 1.7% had residual severe stenosis at 1 month, and 2.5% developed severe restenosis. The results were significantly better after stenting compared with angioplasty alone at 1 month (P<0.001) but not at 1 year. Recurrent ipsilateral symptoms were more common in endovascular patients with severe stenosis (5/32 [15.6%]) compared with lesser degrees of stenosis at 1 year (11/141 [7.8%], P=0.02), but most were transient ischemic attacks and none were disabling or fatal strokes. There were no recurrent symptoms in the 9 endarterectomy patients with > or =70% stenosis at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid stenosis 1 year after endovascular treatment is partly explained by poor initial anatomical results and partly by restenosis. The majority of patients were treated by angioplasty without stenting. Further randomized studies are required to determine whether newer carotid stenting techniques are associated with a lower risk of restenosis. The low rate of recurrent stroke in both endovascular and endarterectomy patients suggests that treatment of restenosis should be limited to patients with recurrent symptoms, but long term follow up data are required.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may reduce the risk for perioperative or late carotid artery recurrent stenosis and subsequent ischemic stroke. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty compared with CEA with primary closure, and the effect of different materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

METHODS

Randomized trials were included if they compared carotid patch angioplasty with primary closure in any patients undergoing CEA or use of one type of carotid patch with another.

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible randomized trials were identified. Seven trials involving 1281 operations compared primary closure with routine patch closure, and 8 trials with 1480 operations compared different patch materials (2 studies compared both). Patch angioplasty was associated with a reduction in risk for stroke of any type (P = .004), ipsilateral stroke (P = .001), and stroke or death during both the perioperative period (P = .007) and long-term follow-up (P = .004). Patching was also associated with reduced risk for perioperative arterial occlusion (P = .0001) and decreased recurrent stenosis during long-term follow-up (P < .0001). Seven trials that compared different patch types showed no difference in the risk for stroke, death, or arterial recurrent stenosis either perioperatively or at 1-year follow-up. One study of 180 patients (200 arteries) compared collagen-impregnated Dacron (Hemashield) patches with polytetrafluoroethylene patches. There was a significant increase in risk for stroke (P = .02), combined stroke and transient ischemic attack (P = .03), and recurrent stenosis (P = .01) at 30 days, and an increased risk for late recurrent stenosis greater than 50% (P < .001) associated with Dacron compared with polytetrafluoroethylene.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid patch angioplasty decreases the risk for perioperative death or stroke, and long-term risk for ipsilateral ischemic stroke. More data are required to establish differences between various patch materials.

Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid patch angioplasty (with either a venous or a synthetic patch) may reduce the risk of carotid artery restenosis and subsequent ischaemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty compared to carotid endarterectomy with primary closure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched November 2002). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2001), EMBASE (1980 to December 2001) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 2001). We also handsearched eight journals and five conference proceedings. Reference lists were checked and we contacted experts in the field to identify further published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing carotid patch angioplasty with primary closure in any patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

The previous review included six trials involving 794 patients undergoing 882 operations. Since the last review only one study of adequate quality to be included has been reported. This added 399 operations randomised to either primary closure, vein patch or synthetic patch groups resulting in 1127 patients undergoing 1307 operations being available for analysis. The quality of trials was generally poor. Follow-up varied from hospital discharge to five years. Carotid patch angioplasty was associated with a reduction in the risk of stroke of any type (OR = 0.33, p = 0.004), ipsilateral stroke (OR = 0.31, p = 0.0008), and stroke or death, during the perioperative period (OR = 0.39, p = 0.007) and long term follow-up (OR = 0.59, p = 0.004). It was also associated with a reduced risk of perioperative arterial occlusion (odds ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.37 p = 0.00004), and decreased restenosis during long-term follow-up in five trials, (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.29 p < 0.00001). These results are more certain than those of the previous review since the number of operations and events have increased. However, the sample sizes are still relatively small, data were not available from all trials, and there was significant loss to follow-up. Very few arterial complications, including haemorrhage, infection, cranial nerve palsies and pseudo-aneurysm formation were recorded with either patch or primary closure. No significant correlation was found between use of patch angioplasty and the risk of either perioperative or long-term all-cause death rates

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence suggests that carotid patch angioplasty may reduce the risk of perioperative arterial occlusion and restenosis. It would appear to reduce the risk of combined death or stroke and there is a non significant trend towards a reduction in all-cause mortality.

Carotid redo surgery: both safe and durable

AIM

To examine the outcomes and complications of surgery for recurrent carotid stenosis.

METHODS

From 1974 to 2000, 1922 carotid endarterectomies were performed in our unit. A retrospective cohort analysis of these records identified 24 patients (1.2%) who underwent surgery for recurrent stenosis.

RESULTS

There were 13 men and 11 women in the group. Median follow up was 7.2 years (interquartile range 4.4-12.4 years). The indication for redo surgery was either symptomatic severe (80-99%) or moderate (50-79%) restenosis, or severe asymptomatic (80-99%) restenosis. Repair was performed by patch angioplasty (88%), endarterectomy alone (8%) or interposition grafting (4%). Within the 30 day perioperative period there were no deaths, no strokes (major or minor), or significant cardiac morbidity. One patient (4%) developed a permanent spinal accessory nerve deficit. Another patient (4%) required further re-intervention for recurrent disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Very low surgical morbidity and mortality was achieved in our unit by implementing a policy of selective re-intervention for carotid restenosis. Redo carotid endarterectomy can therefore be recommended as having no greater morbidity than primary carotid endarterectomy. Carotid angioplasty and stenting are not recommended as a routine alternative treatment.

Correlation of intra-operative duplex findings during carotid endarterectomy with neurological events and recurrent stenosis at one year

OBJECTIVES

Carotid endarterectomy has been used to treat both asymptomatic and symptomatic disease and this has meant that recurrent stenosis and its effect on late stroke risk have become increasingly important. In this study we compared anatomical defects and residual stenosis identified intra-operatively with recurrent stenosis and new symptoms developing in the first year after surgery.

DESIGN, MATERIALS & METHODS

Two hundred and forty-four consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were studied prospectively. Residual anatomical defects were noted; residual stenosis was defined by intra-operative duplex ultrasound as >50%. New stenoses and clinical events during the one-year surveillance period were documented.

RESULTS

There was an increased incidence of recurrent stenosis at one year in vessels with residual stenoses (p<0.001) and in vessels containing a residual anatomical defect (p=0.037). There was no significant difference in recurrent stenosis rate with respect to closure (primary or patch) or seniority of surgeon but recurrent stenosis was increased in females (p=0.026). The majority (70%) of restenotic lesions were localised to the origin of the internal carotid artery. The late stroke rate was 0.9% and was not related to recurrent stenosis or symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual stenosis and intra-luminal defects at completion increase the recurrent stenosis rate at one year. The aetiology of recurrent stenosis is multi-factorial and further studies are required to determine whether it is justified to modify the criteria for re-exploration with a view to reducing recurrent stenosis.

Carotid Artery Restenosis: An Ongoing Disease Process

Recurrence of carotid artery stenosis after primary endarterectomy is a well-known entity. The treatment and optimal management of the disease process, however, is a matter of ongoing debate. We retrospectively reviewed carotid endarterectomies for recurrent disease performed at a community hospital over the past 21 years to evaluate the outcome of surgical intervention. Eighty-two recurrences occurred in 1648 carotid endarterectomies. Females had a slightly higher recurrence rate as compared with males, and the majority of patients had risk factors in the form of hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, or cigarette smoking. All endarterectomies were repaired with a patch angioplasty by either a vein or a prosthetic graft. One patient died secondary to complications of coronary artery disease. None of the patients developed any postoperative neurological event or permanent nerve damage. A subgroup of 11 patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis with contralateral occlusion underwent 14 endarterectomies with no neurological complications. In conclusion occlusive carotid disease is an ongoing phenomenon, and continued surveillance is recommended. Surgical treatment of recurrent disease is a safe option. Endarterectomies for recurrent carotid disease in the presence of contralateral occlusion can be performed safely.

Redo carotid endarterectomy versus primary carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several authorities have recently advocated carotid stenting for recurrent carotid stenosis because of the perception that redo surgery has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study compares the early and late results of reoperations versus primary CEA.

METHODS

All reoperations for recurrent carotid stenosis performed during a recent 7-year period by a single vascular surgeon were compared with primary CEA. Because all redo CEAs were done with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or vein patch closure, we only analyzed those primary CEAs that used the same patch closures. A Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to estimate stroke-free survival rates and freedom from >/=50% recurrent stenosis.

RESULTS

Of 547 primary CEAs, 265 had PTFE or saphenous vein patch closure, and 124 reoperations had PTFE or vein patch closure during the same period. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. The indications for reoperation and primary CEA were symptomatic stenosis in 78% and 58% of cases and asymptomatic >/=80% stenosis in 22% and 42% of cases, respectively (P<0.001). The 30-day perioperative stroke and transient ischemic attack rates for reoperation and primary CEA were 4.8% versus 0.8% (P=0.015) and 4% versus 1.1%, respectively, with no perioperative deaths in either group. Cranial nerve injury was noted in 17% of reoperation patients versus 5.3% of primary CEA patients; however, most of these injuries were transient (P<0.001). Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days for reoperation versus 1.6 days for primary CEA. Cumulative rates of stroke-free survival and freedom from >/=50% recurrent stenosis for reoperation and primary CEA at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 91%, and 82% and 98%, 96%, and 95% versus 94%, 92%, and 91% and 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively (no significant differences).

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation carries higher perioperative stroke and cranial nerve injury rates than primary CEA. However, reoperations are durable and have stroke-free survival rates that are similar to primary CEA. These considerations should be kept in mind when carotid stenting is recommended instead of reoperation.

Reconstructive surgery of the extracranial arteries

The first carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually accredited to Eastcott who reported in 1954 the successful incision of a diseased carotid bulb with end-to-end anastomosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to the common carotid artery (CCA). During the following years surgeons were quick to adopt and improve the intuitively attractive procedure. But by the early to mid 1980s several leading neurologists began to question the growing number of CEAs performed at that time. Six major CEA trials were then designed which are now completed or nearing completion. Most conclusive data are available from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) for symptomatic carotid disease, and from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) for asymptomatic carotid disease. The key result of these studies is that CEA is beneficial to high grade symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. While the benefit in symptomatic disease is clear, it may be negligible in asymptomatic patients suffering from other medical conditions, the most important being coronary artery disease. Since the conclusions from the different studies vary significantly, guidelines and recommendations with regard to CEA have been issued by a number of interest groups, so-called consensus conferences. The best known guidelines are published by the American Heart Association (AHA). However, the practice of interest groups to issue guidelines is currently being criticized, the main reason being that interest groups have different ideas and all claim the right to issue guidelines. At present we recommend CEA for symptomatic high-grade stenosis in patients without significant coincident disease. With regard to asymptomatic stenosis we suggest surgery to otherwise healthy patients if the stenosis is very narrow or progressive. Preoperative evaluation has changed over the years. Currently we recommend duplex sonography in combination with intra- and extracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Concurrent coronary artery disease is a major consideration in the perioperative management, and the use of a specific algorithm is recommended. Surgery is performed under general anaesthesia with intraoperative monitoring such as electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). A temporary intraluminal shunt is used selectively if after cross-clamping the flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline. For years we employed routine barbiturate neuroprotection during cross-clamping. At the present time we use barbiturate selectively, if the flow velocity in the MCA falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline and if the use of a temporary intraluminal shunt is not possible due to difficult anatomic conditions. The reason to abandon systematic barbiturate protection was to accelerate recovery from anaesthesia. Our patients are monitored overnight on the ICU or a surveillance unit. Routine hospitalization after surgery is 5 to 7 days with a control duplex sonography being performed prior to discharge. A number of details with regard to surgical technique and perioperative management are a matter of discussion. Our surgical routine is described here step by step. Such management resulted in 6 major complications among the 402 cases with 4 of cardiopulmonary and 2 of cerebrovascular origin. For the future we can expect the development of percutaneous transluminal techniques competing with standard carotid endarterectomy. At the present time several comparative studies are under way. Irrespective of the technical approach to treat carotid stenosis, several other issues have to be clarified before long. One of the major unresolved items is the timing of treatment after completed stroke. In this regard prospective trials need to be performed. Although numerically not as important as carotid stenosis, vertebral artery (VA) and subclavian artery (SA) stenoses are more and more accepted as indication for surgical

Frequency of postoperative carotid duplex surveillance and type of closure: results from a randomized trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

In several nonrandomized studies investigators have reported on the value of postoperative carotid duplex surveillance (PCDS) with mixed results; however the type of closure was not analyzed in these studies. In this study we analyze the frequency and timing of postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound scanning according to the type of closure from a randomized carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trial comparing primary closure (PC) versus patching.

PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS

We randomized 399 CEAs into 135 PCs, 134 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch closures, and 130 vein patch closures (VPCs) with a mean follow-up of 47 months. PCDS was done at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter (a mean of 4.0 studies per artery). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of > or = 80% restenosis over time and the time frame of progression from < 50%, to 50%-79% and > or = 80% stenosis.

RESULTS

Restenoses of > or =80% developed in 24 (21%) arteries with PC and nine (4%) with patching. Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom of > or = 80% restenosis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 92%, 83%, 80%, 76%, and 68% for PC, respectively, and 100%, 99%, 98%, 98%, and 91% for patching, respectively, (P <.01). Of 56 arteries with 20% to 50% restenosis, two of 28 patch closures and 10 of 28 PCs progressed to 50% to < 80% restenosis (P =.02); none of the patch closures and six of 28 PCs progressed to > or =80% (P =.03). In PCs, the median time to progression from <50% to 50%-79%, < 50% to > or =80%, and 50%-79% to > or = 80% was 42, 46, and 7 months, respectively. Of the 24 arteries with > or =80% restenosis in PC, 10 were symptomatic. Thus, assuming th symptomatic restenosis would have undergone duplex scan examinations regardless, there were 14 asymptomatic arteries (12%) that could have been detected only with PCDS (estimated cost, $139, 200), and those patients would have been candidates for redo CEA. Of the 9 arteries (3 PTFE closures and 6 VPCs) with > or =80% restenosis with patch closures, 6 asymptomatic (4 VPCs and 2 PTFE closures) arteries (3%) could have been detected with PCDS. In patients with normal duplex scan findings at the first 6 months, only four (2%) of 222 patched arteries (two asymptomatic) developed > or = 80% restenosis versus five (38%) of 13 in patients with abnormal duplex scan examination findings (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PCDS is beneficial in patients with PC, but is less beneficial in patients with patch closure. PCDS examinations at 6 months and at 1- to 2-year intervals for several years after PC are adequate. For patients with patching, a 6-month postoperative duplex scan examination with normal results is adequate.

Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The durability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be affected by carotid restenosis. The data from randomized trials show that the highest incidence of restenosis after CEA occurs from 12 to 18 months after surgery. The optimal CEA technique to reduce perioperative complications and restenosis rates is still undefined. This study examines the long-term clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis in patients who undergo eversion CEA. Previously published perioperative results of this study did not show statistically significant differences in study endpoints between the eversion and standard techniques.

METHODS

From October 1994 to March 1997, 1353 patients with surgical indications for carotid stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo eversion (n = 678) or standard CEA (n = 675; primary closure, 419; patch, 256). Withdrawal from the assigned treatment occurred in 1.6% of the patients (in 13 assigned to eversion CEA, and in nine assigned to standard CEA). The clinical and duplex scan follow-up examination was 99% complete, and the mean follow-up interval was 33 months (range, 12 to 55 months). The primary outcomes were perioperative and late major stroke and death, carotid restenosis (stenosis >/= 50% of the lumen diameter detected at duplex scanning), and carotid occlusion. The primary evaluation of study outcomes was conducted on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Restenosis was found at duplex scanning in 56 patients (19 in the eversion group, and 37 in the standard group). Within the standard group, the restenosis rates were 7.9% in the primary closure population and 1.5% in the patched population. Of the patients with restenosis, 36% underwent cerebral angiography that confirmed restenosis in all cases. The cumulative restenosis risk at 4 years was significantly lower in the group that underwent treatment with eversion CEA as compared with the standard group (3.6% vs 9.2%; P =.01), with an absolute risk reduction of 5. 6% and a relative risk reduction of 62%. Eighteen patients would have had to undergo treatment with eversion CEA to prevent one restenosis during the 4-year period. The incidence rate of ipsilateral stroke was 3.3% in the eversion population and 2.2% in the standard group. There were no significant differences in the cumulative risks of ipsilateral stroke (3.9% for eversion, and 2.2% for standard; P =.2) and death (13.1% for eversion, and 12.7% for standard; P =.7)) in the two groups. Of the 18 variables that were examined for their influence on restenosis, eversion CEA (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6; P =.0004) and patch CEA (hazard ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.6; P =. 002) were negative independent predictors of restenosis with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The EVEREST (EVERsion carotid Endarterectomy versus Standard Trial) showed that eversion CEA is safe, effective, and durable. No statistically significant differences were found in late outcome between the eversion and standard techniques at the available follow-up examination.

A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine the appropriate timing and frequency of duplex ultrasound scanning after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the detection of high-grade stenosis caused by recurrent carotid stenosis or contralateral atherosclerotic disease progression.

METHODS

In 221 patients who underwent 242 CEAs, duplex scanning was performed before, during, and after operation (in 3-month to 6-month intervals). High-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (peak systolic velocity, >300 cm/s; diastolic velocity, >125 cm/s; ICA/common carotid artery ratio, >4) prompted the recommendation for repair. An average of four postoperative scanning procedures was performed during a mean follow-up period of 27.4 months.

RESULTS

Intraoperative duplex scan results prompted the immediate revision of 12 repairs (4.9%), and one perioperative stroke (<1%) occurred. Six CEAs (2.7%) had asymptomatic recurrent stenosis (>50% diameter-reduction [DR]; systolic velocity, >125 cm/s) develop. Only one of six patients had >75% DR stenosis develop and underwent reoperation (<1% yield for CEA surveillance). The yield of surveillance of the unoperated ICA was higher (P =.003), and 12% of unoperated sides had progressive stenosis (n = 21) or occlusion (n = 3) develop, which led to seven CEAs for high-grade stenosis. Disease progression to >75% DR stenosis was five times as frequent (P =.002) in patients with >50% DR stenosis initially. All patients but one who required contralateral endarterectomy for disease progression had >50% ICA stenosis when first seen. During the follow-up period, no disabling strokes ipsilateral to an operated carotid artery occurred, but three strokes occurred in the hemisphere of the contralateral unoperated ICA.

CONCLUSION

The yield of duplex scan surveillance after CEA was low. Only 13 patients (5.9%) had severe disease develop to warrant additional intervention. Progression of contralateral disease rather than restenosis was the most common abnormality that was identified. Duplex scanning at 1-year to 2-year intervals after CEA is adequate when a technically precise repair is achieved and minimal contralateral disease (<50% DR) is present. A policy of duplex scan surveillance and reoperation for high-grade stenosis was associated with a 1.6% incidence rate of disabling stroke during the follow-up period.

Hemodynamically significant early recurrent carotid stenosis: an often self-limiting and self-reversing condition

PURPOSE

The natural history of hemodynamically significant (internal carotid systolic velocity more than 125 cm/s) early recurrent carotid stenosis was studied.

METHODS

Recurrent hemodynamically significant stenosis occurred within 24 months in 49 internal carotid arteries (45 patients) after 883 endarterectomies (5.4%). These patients were then examined with serial scans. Subsequent redo endarterectomy and neurological events were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients were observed for 9 to 84 months (mean, 53 months). Arteries with recurrent stenosis were grouped according to the maximal velocity recorded: group I, systolic velocity more than 125 cm/s and less than 280 cm/s (12); group II, systolic velocity more than 280 cm/s or diastolic velocity more than 80 cm/s (21); group III, systolic velocity more than 280 cm/s and diastolic velocity more than 120 cm/s (14); group IV, internal carotid artery occlusion (2). The mean time to a velocity of more than 125 cm/s was 11 months. The mean time to peak velocity was 16 months. During The Follow-UP Period, Five Stenoses Remained Stable. Nineteen Continued To Increase, With Two Eventual Asymptomatic Occlusions (4%). Six Recurrences Ultimately Had Redo Endarterectomy, Two For Symptoms. Three Of These Developed New Secondary Recurrent Lesions. However, In 25 Arteries (53%), The Velocity Profile Decreased By At Least One Group Classification. The Mean Time To The Lowest Velocity (TTL) Was 50 Months. Systolic Velocity Ultimately Fell Below 125 Cm/S In 13 Stenoses (SIX In Group I; Five In Group II; Two In Group III).

CONCLUSION

Early recurrent hemodynamically significant stenosis is unusual and rarely progresses to occlusion. Even critical stenosis can regress to within normal limits. Redo endarterectomy is seldom necessary. The challenge remains to define which patients are at risk for symptoms and occlusion.

Reoperation for carotid stenosis is as safe as primary carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

Patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis are sometimes referred for carotid angioplasty and stenting because of reports that carotid reoperation has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a difference exists between outcomes of primary carotid endarterectomy and reoperative carotid surgery.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for all carotid operations performed from September 1993 through March 1998 by vascular surgery faculty at a single academic center. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 390 operations were performed on 352 patients. Indications for primary carotid endarterectomy (n = 350) were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 42% of the cases, amaurosis fugax and transient ischemic symptoms in 35%, global symptoms in 14%, and previous stroke in 9%. Indications for reoperative carotid surgery (n = 40) were symptomatic recurrent lesions in 50% of the cases and progressive high-grade asymptomatic stenoses in 50%. The results of primary carotid endarterectomy were no postoperative deaths, an overall stroke rate of 1.1% (three postoperative strokes, one preoperative stroke after angiography), and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. The results of operations for recurrent carotid stenosis were no postoperative deaths, no postoperative strokes, and no permanent cranial nerve deficits. In the primary carotid endarterectomy group, the mean hospital length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1. 1 days and the mean hospital cost was $9700. In the reoperative group, the mean length of stay was 2.6 +/- 1.5 days and the mean cost was $13,700. The higher cost of redo surgery is accounted for by a higher preoperative cerebral angiography rate (90%) in redo cases as compared with primary endarterectomy (40%).

CONCLUSION

In this series of 390 carotid operations, the procedure-related stroke/death rate was 0.8%. There were no differences between the stroke-death rates after primary carotid endarterectomy and operation for recurrent carotid stenosis. Operation for recurrent carotid stenosis is as safe and effective as primary carotid endarterectomy and should continue to be standard treatment.

Analysis of regression of postoperative carotid stenosis from prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy comparing primary closure versus patching

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been reported to vary between a few percent and 30%. Regression of recurrent stenosis has been reported sporadically in the literature, but studies analyzing the factors affecting regression are lacking. This study analyzed factors affecting the regression of postoperative stenosis from a prospective randomized trial of CEA comparing primary closure (PC) versus patching.

PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS

Three hundred ninety-nine CEAs were randomized into three groups: 135 PCs, 135 polytetrafluoroethylene patch closures (PTFE), and 130 vein patch closures (VPC). Postoperative duplex ultrasounds were done at 1, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly. The subgroup of these CEAs that exhibited postoperative stenosis was followed for possible regression of the stenosis. Analyses of various risk factors were examined for possible association with regression of recurrent stenosis. Mean follow-up was 46 months.

RESULTS

Of 105 postoperative stenoses, regression was noted in 6/64 (9%) in PC, 6/13 (46%) in PTFE, and 10/28 (36%) in VPC. Overall, 22 recurrent stenoses regressed; 19 regressed to normal and 3 regressed from 50% to 80% stenosis to 20% to <50% stenosis. The mean time to regression was 383 days. Regression was more common in patching than PC. Both VPC and PTFE had significantly more regression than PC. When stenoses of 50% to 80% were analyzed, patching had more regression than PC. None of the recurrent stenoses > or = 80% regressed. There was no association between regression and other factors, including gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, smoking, internal carotid artery diameter, hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, or aspirin intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Regression of recurrent stenosis was associated more strongly with patching than with PC. There was no association between regression and other factors.

Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Review

Carotid endarterectomy clearly benefits high stroke-risk patients, but its value for asymptomatic patients is still being debated. If a high exposure is necessary for redo procedures or distal aneurysms, mandibular subluxation and styloidectomy may be required. Perioperative mortality and morbidity are acceptably low. Restenosis occurs in few patients.http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00547/bibs/8n3p139.html

The natural history of early recurrent carotid artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Early recurrent carotid stenosis, defined as greater than 50% stenosis within 2 years of a carotid endarterectomy (CEA), occurs in 4% to 19% of patients. These lesions are secondary to myointimal hyperplasia (MH). The natural history of these lesions has been examined prospectively, but the appropriate management of these lesions has not been clearly defined. The vascular surgery service at Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC) has prospectively collected a cohort of patients with recurrent high-grade carotid stenoses following CEA to determine their natural history and define the ideal therapeutic approach for those lesions.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA between January 1, 1993, and January 1, 1997, at a single tertiary care institution were followed prospectively with postoperative carotid duplexes at 3-month intervals for the first year and then every 6 months for a year and then annually thereafter. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, type of carotid closure, neurologic morbidity, and death. These results were compared with accepted rates in the literature. Discrete variables were tested for significance by chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test. A P value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-four (174) patients with 181 operative sites were evaluated. Fourteen patients with 17 sites (9%) had recurrent stenosis. Twelve patients with 14 sites (7%) had stenoses of 50% to 79%. All were asymptomatic. Two patients with 3 sites (2%) had stenoses greater than 80%. Two sites were managed operatively because of neurologic symptoms or preocclusive nature and one remains asymptomatic and stable on serial duplex imaging. All lesions were present at 6 months and those in the 50% to 79% category did not progress in follow-up. Recurrent carotid stenosis occurred to a significantly higher degree in women (women 11 of 60 18.3% versus men 6 of 114 5.3%; P = 0.25), primary closure versus patch angioplasty (primary 6 of 22 27.3% versus patch 11 of 159 6.9%; P = 0.01), and dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch angioplasty (dacron 7 of 36 19.4% versus PTFE 2 of 100 2.0%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Early recurrent stenosis (50% to 79%) is a benign lesion. Patch angioplasty is preferred over primary closure. Dacron patches had a significantly higher rate of recurrent stenosis when compared with PTFE patches. Women undergoing CEA are more prone to recurrent stenosis. Postoperative duplex at 3 and 6 months will identify recurrent carotid stenosis (given a normal duplex prior to discharge following CEA). Moderate high-grade (50% to 79%) stenoses are benign. High-grade (80% to 99%) stenoses require individual management.

Redo carotid surgery: An analysis of materials and configurations used in carotid reoperations and their influence on perioperative stroke and subsequent recurrent stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The ideal method of arterial reconstruction in operations for recurrent carotid disease after prior endarterectomy is unknown. The goal of this study was to review a series of carotid reoperations and to determine whether the surgical technique influenced the rate of perioperative stroke, late stroke, or secondary restenosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 82 carotid reoperations performed on 74 patients at our institution.

RESULTS

The patient population included 39 men (52.7%) and 35 women (47.3%), with a mean age of 67.5 years. The indications for redo surgery included transient ischemic attack or amaurosis fugax in 35.3% of the patients, stroke in 6.1%, and asymptomatic restenosis (>80%) in 58.5%. Patch angioplasty with or without redo endarterectomy was used in 47 cases (57.3%), with saphenous vein in 26 (31.7%), Dacron in 15 (18.3%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 6 (7.3%). Interposition grafting was used in 35 cases (42.7%), with saphenous vein in 9 (11.0%), Dacron in 10 (12.2%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 16 (19.5%). The perioperative complications included three strokes (3.7%). There was a trend toward increased perioperative neurologic complications with interposition grafting when compared with patch angioplasty (8.6% vs 2.1%), although this did not reach statistical significance. Long-term clinical follow-up was obtained in all cases with a mean duration of 35 months, with follow-up duplex scanning performed in 89.2%. The late failures of redo surgery included four significant secondary restenoses and five total occlusions. There was a trend towards improved long-term results with interposition grafting as opposed to patch angioplasty. However, the cases in which reconstruction was performed with a vein had a significantly higher rate of late failures (stroke, secondary recurrent stenosis, or occlusion) than those in which reconstruction was performed with any prosthetic material (26.7% vs 2.3%; P =.002 by Fisher exact test).

CONCLUSION

The use of autologous material for redo carotid surgery in any configuration appears to significantly increase the rate of subsequent recurrent stenosis or total occlusion of the operated artery. The reason for this finding is unclear but may be related to both host and technical factors. Prosthetic material may be more durable in the long-term for redo carotid surgery. Interposition grafting for redo carotid surgery may increase the perioperative neurologic complication rate to some degree; however, this was not statistically significant in this series. Interposition grafting may be a more durable solution in long-term follow-up than redo endarterectomy and patch angioplasty. A longer follow-up period will be needed to confirm this conclusion.

Carotid angioplasty and stenting in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

To examine our initial experience in carotid stenting (CS) for the prevention of stroke in patients with high-grade carotid stenoses.

METHODS

The authors performed 26 CS procedures in 25 carotid vessels in 22 patients over a 15-month period. All carotid stenoses treated, except one, were 70% or greater. Of all CS procedures, 84% were performed for obstructing atherosclerotic plaques. CS was performed in one patient each for carotid dissection and pseudoaneurysms caused by a gunshot wound, post-radiation stenosis, post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) restenosis, and a flow-obstructing post-CEA intimal flap. Of all patients, 68.2% were symptomatic, with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks ipsilateral to the treated carotid artery. In addition, 36.4% of our patients were either hospitalized or required skilled nursing care before CS because of severe neurologic deficits. Using the Sundt CEA-risk classification system, 59.1% of our patients were classified as Grade III and 40.9% were Grade IV pre-CS. All but one patient had either a compelling medical or anatomic reason for endovascular treatment of their carotid disease. We used both Wallstents and Palmaz stents, and all procedures were performed via the transfemoral route. Three procedures were performed in conjunction with detachable platinum coil embolization for multiple carotid pseudoaneurysms, a residual carotid "stump" after previous ICA thrombosis, and an ipsilateral MCA saccular aneurysm.

RESULTS

We had a 96.2% procedural technical success rate. There was one death in our series 3 weeks post-CS attributable to myocardial infarction. Despite a high 30-day combined death, stroke, and ipsilateral blindness rate of 27.3% (6/22 patients), only two ipsilateral strokes directly related to CS occurred (7.7% per procedures performed) from which one patient recovered fully within 5 days. The average follow-up post-CS was 5.9 months (range, 3 weeks-15 months). Of successfully treated vessels, 58.3% have undergone 6-month follow-up vascular imaging, which has revealed a 14.3% rate of occlusion or restenosis greater than 50%. At or beyond 1 month post-CS, 19 of 21 surviving patients (90.5%) were ambulatory, fluent of speech, and independent, and none has thus far suffered a delayed stroke or TIA.

CONCLUSION

CS seems to be a reasonable alternative to medical management for the treatment of carotid disease in patients deemed to be poor candidates for standard carotid surgery. Longer term follow-up is necessary to assess the durability of carotid revascularization using CS.