Experience with mycophenolate mofetil (RS61443) in renal transplantation at a single center

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for IgA nephropathy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains debatable. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were analyzed to identify eligible trials. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for all the dichotomous outcome measures. A total of eight RCTs with nine publications (n=510 patients) were included. No significant difference was noted between therapeutic regimens with and without MMF for renal remission and end stage renal disease (ESRD) of patients with IgAN (seven trials; RR, 1.250; 95% CI, 0.993–1.574; P=0.057; and four trials; RR, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.164–3.236; P=0.676). To further define the effects of MMF for renal remission, subgroup analysis was performed, demonstrating that MMF was significantly more effective compared with the placebo (three trials; RR, 2.152; 95% CI, 1.198–3.867; P=0.010), although the immunosuppressive regimens with MMF had no significantly different effects compared with those without MMF (four trials; RR, 1.140; 95% CI, 0.955–1.361; P=0.146), indicating that MMF was superior to placebo and had a similar efficacy to other immunosuppressants for renal remission. In addition, subgroup analysis for ESRD revealed no significant differences between MMF and placebo and between the immunosuppressive regimens with and without MMF (three trials; RR, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.160–5.726; P=0.962; and one trial; RR, 0.205; 95% CI, 0.010–4.200; P=0.303). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the therapeutic regimens with and without MMF in terms of the risk of adverse events. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that MMF was more effective compared with the placebo, may have similar efficacy to other immunosuppressants in terms of inducing renal remission of IgAN and may not increase the risk of adverse events. The long-term effects of MMF on the prognosis of patients with IgAN require verification in further studies.

Pharmacologic targeting of regulatory T cells for solid organ transplantation: current and future prospects

The last three decades have witnessed significant advances in the development of immunosuppressive medications used in kidney transplantation leading to a remarkable gain in short-term graft function and outcomes. Despite these major breakthroughs, improvements in long-term outcomes lag behind due to a stalemate between drug-related nephrotoxicity and chronic rejection typically due to donor-specific antibodies. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been shown to modulate the alloimmune response and can exert suppressive activity preventing allograft rejection in kidney transplantation. Currently available immunosuppressive agents impact Tregs in the alloimmune milieu with some of these interactions being deleterious to the allograft while others may be beneficial. Variable effects are seen with common antibody induction agents such that basiliximab, an IL-2 receptor blocker, decreases Tregs while lymphocyte depleting agents such as antithymocyte globulin increase Tregs. Calcineurin inhibitors, a mainstay of maintenance immunosuppression since the mid-1980s, seem to suppress Tregs while mammalian targets of rapamycin (less commonly used in maintenance regimens) expand Tregs. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of Treg biology in transplantation, identify in more detail the interactions between commonly used immunosuppressive agents and Tregs in kidney transplantation and lastly describe future directions in the use of Tregs themselves as therapy for tolerance induction.

The role of mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation revisited

Since its regulatory approval in 1995, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has largely replaced azathioprine (AZA) as the anti-metabolite immunosuppressive of choice in kidney transplantation. While the initial industry-sponsored clinical trials suggested strong reductions in the incidence of acute rejection in the first six months post transplantation, long-term follow-up studies have failed to demonstrate a similar degree of benefit in overall graft and patient survival. In addition, several subsequent studies have raised questions on the potential attenuating effects of calcineurin inhibitor choice on MMF efficacy when compared to AZA. This review will revisit the question of whether the available evidence continues to support the superiority of MMF over AZA in kidney transplantation outcomes while comprehensively reviewing the available evidence from clinical trial data, systematic reviews, and registry studies.

No harmful effect of mycophenolate mofetil on liver regeneration: an experimental study

AIM

The aim of this experimental study was to examine the effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on liver regeneration in a partial hepatectomy model.

METHODS

Rats were divided into 3 groups immediately following partial liver resection: saline, controls intraperitoneally (MMF; Group 1); MMF (15 mg/kg/d; Group II), and MMF (30 mg/kg/d; Group III). On days 3 and 7 following liver resection we humanely killed half of the rats in each group to measure alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and to evaluate Ki-67 using immunohistochemistry. We calculated liver regeneration rates.

RESULTS

The difference between ALT levels on days 3 and 7 was not significantly different among the groups (P = .157; P = .292; P > .05, respectively). The AST levels were significantly different at 3 days (P = .018) but not 7 days (P = .385). The Ki-67 level were different among groups at day 3 (P = .002) but not at day 7 (P = .290). Liver regeneration rates were not different among the groups either at 3 or at 7 days (P = .264 and P = .925, respectively).

CONCLUSION

MMF stimulates mitosis but its effect on regeneration is not clear. MMF appeared to show no adverse effects on liver regeneration.

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

Advances in the diagnosis and immunotherapy for ocular inflammatory disease

Significant advances in the diagnosis and therapy for uveitis have been made to improve the quality of care for patients with ocular inflammatory diseases. While traditional ophthalmic examination techniques, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography continue to play a major role in the evaluation of patients with uveitis, the advent of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence into clinical practice provides additional information about disease processes. Polymerase chain reaction and cytokine diagnostics have also continued to play a greater role in the evaluation of patients with inflammatory diseases. The biologic agents, a group of medications that targets cytokines and other soluble mediators of inflammation, have demonstrated promise in targeted immunotherapy for specific uveitic entities. Their ophthalmic indications have continued to expand, improving the therapeutic armentarium of uveitis specialists.

Review of Major Clinical Trials with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was approved for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation based on the results of three groundbreaking, large, clinical trials that demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of acute rejection in patients receiving MMF when compared with those receiving placebo or azathioprine. These three multicenter, prospective, double-blind trials performed at 55 transplant centers on three continents were the largest immunosuppressive drug trials ever attempted and the first prospective, randomized, double-blind trials ever performed in transplantation. These pivotal trials established a foundation for widespread acceptance of MMF in combination with cyclosporine and steroids as a maintenance regimen for renal transplant patients. The findings of these initial trials that led to the approval of MMF for renal transplantation, including long-term follow-up data, will be reviewed in this paper. The expanding scope of major trials of MMF, including trials in pediatric patients, combination regimens with novel induction therapies or other maintenance agents, and trials in special patient populations such as those at high immunological risk or with deteriorating kidney function, will also be discussed.

The Impact of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used in kidney and pancreas transplantation for almost 10 years. In the pivotal phase III trials, MMF use was accompanied by a dramatic reduction of rejection rates in kidney transplantation; however, the impact on graft and patient was undetermined. Analyses of the United States Renal Data System and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases later provided a valuable measure of the impact of MMF in improving outcomes. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the prospective studies, including but not limited to the pivotal MMF approval trials, and analyses of the national transplant registries relevant to the long-term impact of MMF in kidney transplantation. Indeed, a substantial body of evidence has shown MMF treatment improves patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival in kidney transplantation. The beneficial effects of MMF have been particularly notable in high-risk recipients such as African Americans. In coming years, these benefits will require reevaluation in the context of the growing use of novel protocols combining MMF with tacrolimus or sirolimus.

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation (MYSS): a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil has replaced azathioprine in immunosuppression regimens worldwide to prevent graft rejection. However, evidence that its antirejection activity is better than that of azathioprine has been provided only by registration trials with an old formulation of ciclosporin and steroid. We aimed to compare the antirejection activity of these two drugs with a new formulation of ciclosporin.

METHODS

The mycophenolate steroids sparing multicentre, prospective, randomised, parallel-group trial compared acute rejections and adverse events in recipients of cadaver-kidney transplants over 6-month treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine along with ciclosporin microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids (phase A), and over 15 more months without steroids (phase B). The primary endpoint was occurrence of acute rejection episodes. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

168 patients per group entered phase A. 56 (34%) assigned mycophenolate mofetil and 58 (35%) assigned azathioprine had clinical rejections (risk reduction [RR] on mycophenolate mofetil compared with azathioprine 13.7% [95% CI -25.7% to 40.7%], p=0.44). 88 patients in the mycophenolate mofetil group and 89 in the azathioprine group entered phase B. 14 (16%) taking mycophenolate mofetil and 11 (12%) taking azathioprine had clinical rejections (RR -16.2%, [-157.5% to 47.5%], p=0.71). Average per-patient costs of mycophenolate mofetil treatment greatly exceeded those of azathioprine (phase A 2665 Euros [SD 586] vs Euros 184 [62]; phase B 5095 Euros [2658] vs 322 Euros [170], p<0.0001 for both).

INTERPRETATION

In recipients of cadaver kidney-transplants given ciclosporin microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil offers no advantages over azathioprine in preventing acute rejections and is about 15 times more expensive. Standard immunosuppression regimens for transplantation should perhaps include azathioprine rather than mycophenolate mofetil, at least for kidney grafts.

Mycophenolate mofetil in solid-organ transplantation

This review focuses on the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunosuppressive agent in solid-organ transplantation. MMF, a non-competitive inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, blocks de novo purine synthesis in T and B lymphocytes, resulting in the selective inhibition of proliferation of these cells in response to antigenic stimuli. MMF may also promote apoptosis of these cells. The immunosuppressive ability of MMF is thought to derive mainly from the inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. The other effects of MMF include suppression of antibody synthesis by B lymphocytes, inhibition of proliferation of smooth muscle cells in culture and impaired glycosylation of adhesion molecules. MMF may exhibit anti-inflammatory effects resulting from decreased activity of the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase, a consequence of depletion of tetrahydrobiopterin, which leads to decreased generation of peroxynitrite, a pro-inflammatory molecule. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and principles underlying therapeutic drug monitoring of MMF are reviewed. The results of the pivotal clinical trials of MMF in kidney and heart transplantation are discussed and a summary of the major studies demonstrating a positive effect of MMF on renal transplantation outcomes is presented. The use of MMF in the context of ABO-incompatible renal transplantation, renal transplantation in highly sensitised and cross-match positive recipients, humoral rejection of renal allografts, chronic allograft nephropathy and steroid/calcineurin inhibitor minimisation in renal transplantation are also discussed.

Lack of Toxic Effects Following Acute Overdose of Cellcept (Mycophenolate Mofetil)

Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressive drug used for prevention of graft rejection following solid organ transplant and for treatment of autoimmune disorders. We report a case of a 24-year-old female with lupus nephritis that presented following ingestion of 10 grams of mycophenolate in a suicide gesture. Serum levels confirmed ingestion. The patient was treated with decontamination and supportive care and recovered with no adverse effect.

Mycophenolate Pharmacokinetics in Early Period Following Lung or Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on mycophenolic acid (MPA), the pharmacologically active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), are derived largely from renal transplant patients, not thoracic transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a pilot study, the pharmacokinetics of MPA at 3 different times in the early period (up to the first 9 mo) following lung or heart transplantation.

METHODS

Nine patients were entered into this open-label study. Upon administration of a steady-state morning MMF dose, blood samples were collected at 0, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after the dose at 3 times (denoted as sampling periods 1, 2, and 3) in the early posttransplant period. Total MPA concentrations were measured by a validated HPLC method with ultraviolet detection and followed by ultrafiltration of pooled samples for unbound MPA concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters (maximal concentration [C(max)], dose-normalized C(max), time to C(max), minimum concentration, predose concentration, AUC, dose-normalized AUC, free fraction, free AUC) were calculated by traditional noncompartmental methods.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics included 7 men and 2 women, 5 lung and 4 heart transplant recipients, mean +/- SD age 53 +/- 11 years, and weight 77 +/- 14 kg. All patients were receiving prednisone and cyclosporine (with the exception of 2 pts. on tacrolimus during sampling periods 2 and 3). Sampling periods 1, 2, and 3 occurred on posttransplant days 15 +/- 13, 56 +/- 33, and 125 +/- 73, respectively. No significant differences were found between sampling periods in any pharmacokinetic parameter. Drug exposure as evaluated by AUC was 39.95 +/- 44.86, 25.24 +/- 25.68, and 43.96 +/- 38.67 micro g*h/mL during sampling periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively, (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

As of September 26, 2003, this is the first study to systematically evaluate MPA pharmacokinetics in thoracic transplant recipients at 3 different time points during the early posttransplant period. Wide interpatient variability in MPA pharmacokinetics was observed, thus emphasizing the need to individualize dosing of MMF and to further evaluate important pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters and endpoints that impact on clinical outcomes. Further studies involving more patients and pharmacodynamic outcomes are underway to help identify optimal MMF strategies.

Mycophenolate mofetil for solid organ transplantation: does the evidence support the need for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring?

The need for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring (CPM) of the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been debated. Using a previously developed algorithm, the authors reviewed the evidence to support or refute the utility of CPM of MMF. First, MMF has proven efficacy for prevention of organ rejection in renal and cardiac transplant populations. In addition, the pharmacologically active form of MMF, mycophenolic acid (MPA), can be measured readily in plasma, and relationships between the incidence of rejection and MPA predose concentrations and MPA area under the curve (AUC) have been reported. A lower limit of the therapeutic range (MPA predose concentrations >1.55 microg/mL, as measured by enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique [EMIT], or MPA AUC >30 or 40 microg. h/mL, as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) has been suggested to prevent rejection in renal allograft patients. Similarly, in cardiac transplant patients, decreased incidences of organ rejection have been reported in patients with MPA concentrations >2 or 3 microg/mL (using EMIT) and total AUC values >42.8 microg. h/mL (using HPLC). However, the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse events in renal and cardiac transplant patients remains unclear. Due to the nature of antirejection therapy, the pharmacologic response of MMF is not readily assessable, and therapy is life-long. MPA pharmacokinetics exhibit large inter- and intrapatient variability and may be altered in specific patient populations due to changes in protein binding, concomitant disease states, or interactions with concurrent immunosuppressants. Therefore, on the basis of current evidence, CPM can provide more information regarding efficacy of MMF than clinical judgment alone in select patient populations. However, further randomized, prospective trials are required to clarify unresolved issues. Specifically, an upper limit of the therapeutic range, above which the risk of side effects is increased, needs to be elucidated for MMF therapy. Other future directions for research include determining a practical limited sampling strategy for MPA AUC; clarifying the relationship between free MPA concentrations, efficacy, and toxicity; and defining the pharmacodynamic relationship between activity of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (the enzyme inhibited by MPA) and risk of rejection or adverse effects.

Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of mycophenolic acid in stable lung transplant recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use is increasing in solid organ transplantation. Mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of MMF, is highly protein bound and only free MPA is pharmacologically active. The average MPA free fraction in healthy adult individuals, stable renal transplant recipients, and heart transplant recipients is approximately 2 to 3%. However, no data are currently available on MPA protein binding in stable lung transplant recipients and little is known regarding MPA's pharmacokinetic characteristics after lung transplantation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile and protein binding of MPA in this patient population. Seven patients were entered into the study. On administration of a steady-state morning MMF dose, blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 12 hours post-dose. Total MPA concentrations were measured by a validated HPLC method with UV detection and followed by ultrafiltration of pooled samples for free MPA concentrations. Area under the curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), time to peak concentration (Tmax), trough concentration (Cmin), free fraction (f), and free MPA AUC were calculated by traditional pharmacokinetic methods. Patient characteristics included; 3 males and 4 females, an average of 4.4 years post-lung transplant (range, 0.3-11.5 yr), mean (+/- SD) age of 50 +/- 10 years and weight 69 +/- 20 kg. Mean albumin concentration was 37 +/- 3 g/L and serum creatinine was 142 +/- 49 micromol/L. All patients were on cyclosporine and prednisone. MMF dosage ranged from 1 to 3 g daily (35.5 +/- 14.1 mg/kg/d; range, 15.2-60.0 mg/kg/d). Mean (+/- SD) AUC was 45.78 +/- 18.35 microg.h/mL (range, 16.56-74.22 microg.h/mL), Cmax was 17.37 +/- 7.69 microg/mL (range, 4.92-26.63 microg/mL), Tmax was 1.2 +/- 0.4 hours (range, 1.0-2.0 h), Cmin was 3.12 +/- 1.41 microg/mL (range, 1.47-4.82 microg/mL), f was 2.90 +/- 0.56% (range, 2.00-3.40%), and free MPA AUC was 1.29 +/- 0.50 microg.h/mL (range, 0.54-1.88 microg.h/mL). This is the first study to determine these pharmacokinetic characteristics of MPA in the lung transplant population. Further studies should focus on identification of MMF dosing strategies that optimize immunosuppressive efficacy and minimize toxicity in lung allograft recipients.

Adverse gastrointestinal effects of mycophenolate mofetil: aetiology, incidence and management

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a relatively new immunosuppressive drug. It inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in the de novo pathway of purine synthesis, and thus causes lymphocyte-selective immunosuppression. Large clinical trials have revealed the efficacy of MMF in the prevention of allograft rejection when administered together with cyclosporin or tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Although the adverse effect profile of MMF is comparatively benign, gastrointestinal adverse effects are a major concern. These effects are partially explained by the increased immune suppression, by the mode of action and by interactions, particularly with other immunosuppressants. The aetiology of the rarest gastrointestinal adverse effects is still not completely clear. Therapy depends upon the clinical gravity of the adverse effects and is therefore a case of waiting and ob- serving. An adjustment of dosage of immunosuppressants according to the clinical situation and, particularly in the case of MMF, spreading the total dosage over more than 2 daily doses are often sufficient. Should adverse effects persist for a longer period of time and be of a more serious nature, a comprehensive invasive diagnostic process is necessary, including endoscopy and biopsy and the search for opportunistic infections. In this case, dosage reduction or the complete withdrawal of MMF seems to be unavoidable. Severe gastrointestinal complications with MMF are rare, but when they do occur they may require extensive diagnosis and treatment. In the future, therapeutic drug monitoring and, where necessary, pharmacological modifications of MMF could lead to a further reduction of adverse effects with an equal or even increased efficacy.

New Aspects of the Treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome

Abstract.The nephrotic syndrome, caused by glomerulonephritis, diabetes mellitus, or amyloidosis, is still a therapeutic challenge. Newer therapeutic approaches may be sought in the fields of immunosuppression, nonspecific supportive measures, heparinoid administration, and removal of a supposed glomerular basement membrane toxic factor. In immunosuppression, the newer drugs now used in organ transplantation (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil) can also be used in the treatment of glomerulonephritis. In nonspecific supportive treatment, angiotensin II receptor antagonists are now used in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Positive effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the nephrotic syndrome have not yet been proven. Cyclooxygenase II inhibitors must be tested but probably have too many renal side effects, similar to those of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Heparinoids or glycosaminoglycans serve as polyanions and thus have protective effects on the negative charge of the glomerular basement membrane. They can now be administered as oral medications. The removal of a supposed glomerular basement membrane toxic factor that induces proteinuria has been attempted for 20 yr and now is usually performed using immunoadsorption. Especially in cases of recurrent nephrotic syndrome after renal transplantation for patients with glomerulonephritis, this approach has been successful in decreasing proteinuria, although in most cases its effect is not lasting but must be continuously renewed.

Current treatment practice in immunosuppression

New drugs have recently been added that may eventually replace the two-decade dominance of cyclosporin in solid organ transplantation. This cornerstone of immunosuppression was introduced by Borel [1] and Calne [2] in the mid-70s. In 1989, Starzl et al., after 2 years of preclinical experimentation, introduced tacrolimus (originally designated as FK506 by the Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company of Japan) as a potent immunosuppressant for liver transplants [3]. Also, in recent years, a variety of novel purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis inhibitors have been tested for transplantation therapy. The leading agent which appears to be replacing the 35-year position occupied by azathioprine is the semi-synthetic morpholinoethyl ester of mycophenolic acid (MPA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), introduced by Allison [4] and Sollinger [5], and developed by the Syntex Corporation (now Roche Pharmaceuticals). Others, affecting different intra- or intercellular messages amplifying immunity, are in the pipeline.

Recent advances in immunosuppressants

In recent years, a large number of structurally diverse immunosuppressants have been discovered that are effective for the treatment of organ transplantation. Some of them are undergoing clinical trials and may soon enter into routine clinical practice. These compounds are either chemical entities obtained from natural sources/synthetic means or biomaterials such as monoclonal antibodies/gene products/proteins. They have been found to interfere at different stages of T cell activation and proliferation, and can be identified as inhibitors of nucleotide synthesis, growth factor signal transduction and differentiation. Newer strategies involving combination of new agents with traditional immunosuppressants, monoclonal antibodies and gene therapy offer enormous potential, not only for the investigation of mechanisms pertaining to graft rejection, but also for its therapeutic prevention.

Immunosuppressive therapy

Although several new immunosuppressive medications have been developed in the past decade, many possible avenues are yet to be explored. Although the newer agents have not reflected any clear benefit in patient or graft survival over CsA or tacrolimus, they have been useful in reducing the incidence and severity of rejection, reducing the concomitant use of steroids, and decreasing the doses of CsA or tacrolimus to minimize their toxicity profile. The appearance of these new agents has given more options to clinicians, who can select the one with the least toxicity and most efficacy for individual patients. In the future, combinations of these agents, in conjunction with a strategy to induce tolerance of the donor organ without drug toxicity, will be the goal.

Decreased protein binding of mycophenolic acid associated with leukopenia in a pancreas transplant recipient with renal failure

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is rapidly hydrolyzed to its active metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is excreted by the kidney after undergoing glucuronidation to MPAG. MPAG has been shown to accumulate in patients with renal failure. MPA is extensively and avidly bound to human serum albumin. In vitro inhibition of the pharmacologic target, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, is dependent on free MPA. It has been demonstrated that high MPAG concentrations decrease MPA protein binding in vitro. In addition, the uremic state is associated with altered protein binding of many drugs.

METHODS

We assessed free MPA, total MPA, and MPAG kinetics in a patient with renal failure receiving MMF for a pancreas transplant, who presented with signs of MMF toxicity. MPA, MPAG, and free MPA were measured by high performance liquid chromatography and a validated 14C-MPA ultrafiltration methodology.

RESULTS

The MPAG area under the concentration curve (AUC) in this patient was extremely high (5899 microg x hr/ml). The total MPA AUC of 36.8 microg x hr/ml was within the range usually obtained in stable renal patients. The free fraction of MPA and the free MPA AUC were markedly elevated (13.8% and 5.07 microg x hr/ml, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe renal insufficiency may have markedly increased free MPA levels that may not be reflected in total MPA concentrations. These patients may be at increased risk for MMF-related toxicity.

A placebo controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the prevention of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients: 1-year results. The European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group

PURPOSE

We performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 oral doses of mycophenolate mofetil with placebo for prevention of acute rejection episodes following first or second cadaveric renal allograft transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated to receive placebo (166), 1 gm. mycophenolate mofetil twice daily (165) or 1.5 gm. mycophenolate mofetil twice daily (160). Patients were given concomitant immunosuppression with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil was initiated within 72 hours of transplantation and was continued for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

The percentages of patients who experienced biopsy proved rejection or withdrew early from the trial for any reason were significantly reduced with 2 gm. (30.3%) and 3 gm. (38.8%) mycophenolate mofetil compared to placebo (56.0%) (p < 0.001). The biopsy proved rejection rates of the placebo, and 2 gm. and 3 gm. mycophenolate mofetil treatment arms were 46.4, 17.6 and 13.8%, respectively. There were fewer patients in the 2 gm. (28.5%) and 3 gm. (24.4%) mycophenolate mofetil groups compared to the placebo (51.8%) group, who received full courses of corticosteroids or antilymphocyte agents for treatment of rejection episodes in the first 6 months after renal transplantation. There was a greater incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, leukopenia and opportunistic events in the mycophenolate mofetil treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil was shown to reduce significantly the number of patients who experienced biopsy proved rejection episodes or treatment failure during the first year after renal transplantation, and was well tolerated.

An update on new immunosuppressive drugs undergoing preclinical and clinical trials: potential applications in organ transplantation

Recent advances in immunobiology and immunopharmacology have led to a better understanding of the actions of immunosuppressive drugs. Over the past 2 years, a number of new agents have been approved for use in solid organ transplant recipients. In addition, new immunosuppressive agents are being tested in preclinical and clinical trials, leading to the promise of an exciting future in organ transplantation. This report reviews the mechanisms of action and the potential future role of these agents in clinical transplantation.

Pharmacology of immunosuppressive medications used in renal diseases and transplantation

As understanding of the molecular basis for the immune response has expanded rapidly, so have the possibilities for designing therapeutic interventions that are more effective, more specific, and safer than current treatment options. The promise of therapeutic advances in the future is based on the rapidly expanding insights into the pathogenesis of abnormal immunologic reactions. Nowhere is the understanding of molecular mechanisms, pathophysiology, and targeted therapy more relevant than in the field of renal transplantation, which makes up much of the clinical database for the use of immunosuppressive therapy for renal disease. Despite the recent advances in basic immunology, clinical validation of new agents and approaches is lacking for most drugs at present. This review will focus in the pharmacology of agents used in the therapy of immunologic renal disease and in renal transplantation. It should be recognized that clinical pharmacology and experience with newer agents is limited, and potential utility is based largely on experimental data.

Structure-activity relationships for inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase by nuclear variants of mycophenolic acid

Structure-activity relationships in the region of the phthalide ring of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor mycophenolic acid have been explored. Replacement of the lactone ring with other cyclic moieties resulted in loss of potency, especially for larger groups. Replacement of the ring by acyclic substituents also indicated a strong sensitivity to steric bulk. A phenolic hydroxyl group, with an adjacent hydrogen bond acceptor, was found to be essential for high potency. The aromatic methyl group was essential for activity; the methoxyl group could be replaced by ethyl to give a compound with 2-4 times the potency of mycophenolic acid in vitro and in vivo.

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients: reappraisal of etiology, evaluation, and management protocols

Transplant recipient sensitization to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens is a major problem in clinical organ transplantation in terms of both magnitude and implication. Highly sensitized patients (HSPs) waiting for renal transplantation constitute a high-risk group with difficult management problems. In this review the factors involved in sensitization, detection of sensitization in the pretransplant period, various strategies tried in its prevention, and the current therapeutic approach to management of HSPs are discussed. Although prevention of sensitization is ideal, in practice a certain percentage of transplant recipients continue to exhibit hypersensitization despite all measures. Methods to remove preformed antibodies are effective but are expensive and not freely available. Aggressive immunosuppression based on cyclosporine (CsA) induction protocols constitute the mainstay in the management of HSPs. The availability of newer, potent, and more specific immunosuppressive agents, particularly those suppressing antibody synthesis, has opened a new avenue for more specific immunosuppression and better graft and patient survival following transplantation. Their clinical utility in improving patient and graft survival in HSPs needs to be evaluated.

Mycophenolate mofetil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in renal transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil is an ester prodrug of the active immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid. It is a noncompetitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, an important enzyme in the de novo synthesis of guanosine nucleotides in T and B lymphocytes. Mycophenolate mofetil and/or mycophenolic acid inhibit the proliferation of lymphocytes and the production of antibodies induced by a variety of mitogens and antigens. Mycophenolate mofetil is also active in several animal models of transplantation and has produced effects in animals that indicate that it may inhibit the chronic rejection process. Mycophenolate mofetil has been compared with azathioprine or placebo in 3 large, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trials as part of combination immunosuppression therapy with cyclosporin and corticosteroids. Compared with either placebo or azathioprine (1 to 2 mg/kg/day or 100 to 150 mg/day), mycophenolate mofetil 2 or 3 g/day was associated with a significantly lower proportion of patients experiencing acute rejection or treatment failure during the first 6 months after transplantation. Mycophenolate mofetil also tended to be associated with a lower proportion of patients who required a full course of antirejection therapy. However, the proportion of patients who died or who had graft loss was similar between all of the treatment groups. There are currently no data regarding the effects of mycophenolate mofetil on long term patient or graft survival, which are important clinical outcomes in assessing its place in the management of renal transplantation. Clinical trials are also needed to evaluate mycophenolate mofetil in specific patient populations (e.g. repeat renal transplant patients or highly sensitised patients), to determine its efficacy in alternative immunosuppressive protocols and to investigate its use in the transplantation of other solid organs. In summary, mycophenolate mofetil appears to be an attractive new agent in the prevention of graft rejection in renal transplant recipients that has shown superior efficacy to azathioprine. Although long term clinical outcome data are required, mycophenolate is a potentially important advance in transplant immunosuppression.

Fresh venous allografts in peripheral arterial reconstruction in dogs. Effects of histocompatibility and of short-term immunosuppression with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil

To date, no arterial substitute has been shown to be as effective as the autologous saphenous vein in peripheral revascularization procedures. In the present study, the venous allograft was evaluated as a vascular substitute in terms of patency and induction of host immune reactivity, whether used in major histocompatibility complex-incompatible, major histocompatibility complex-incompatible dogs. The immunosuppressive drug therapies were given for a period of 31 days, beginning 1 day before transplantation, and consisted of the use of cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, or a combination of both. All histoincompatible allografts were thrombosed at 4 or 8 weeks after transplantation with antibody development and cell-mediated cytotoxicity in the graft, whereas histocompatible allografts showed late stenosis without immunologic reactions directed toward donor cells. Given alone, neither cyclosporine A nor mycophenolate mofetil improved the overall patency of venous allografts; thrombosis occurred shortly after cessation of immunosuppression. Still, the cyclosporine A-mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy led to a 100% patency rate at 20 weeks after implantation and immune reactions were markedly reduced. This study shows that the fresh vein allograft is still an attractive and functional alternative to the autologous saphenous vein if the host immunologic reactions are controlled by cyclosporine A-mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression.

Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years

OBJECTIVE

The study analyzed 3359 consecutive renal transplant operations for patient and graft survival, including living related, cadaveric, and living unrelated patients. The analysis was separated into three groups according to immunosuppression and date of transplant.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Improvements in renal transplantation in the past 25 years have been the result of better immunosuppression, organ preservation, and patient selection.

METHODS

A single transplant center's experience over a 25-year period was analyzed regarding patient and graft survival. Potential risk factors included patient demographics, tissue typing, donor characteristics, number of transplants, acute and chronic rejection, acute tubular necrosis, primary disease, and malignancy.

RESULTS

The primary cause of graft loss was rejection. Improvement in cadaveric graft survival since 1987 with quadruple therapy was not apparent in living donor patients. Race continued to be a negative factor in graft survival. Avoiding previous mismatched antigens and the use of flow cytometry improved allograft survival. The leading cause of death in the past 7 years in cadaveric recipients was cardiac (52%).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved graft survival in the past 25 years was related to 1) advances in immunosuppression, 2) better methods of cytotoxic antibody detection, and 3) human lymphocyte antigen match.