Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. The utility of planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: experience with 63 patients

Biliary drainage method and temporal trends in patients admitted with cholangitis: a national audit

BACKGROUND

In patients presenting with ascending cholangitis, better outcomes are reported in those undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with surgical drainage.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with the type of intervention, and to examine temporal trends in the treatment of ascending cholangitis.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of cholangitis between 1998 and 2009 were selected. Temporal trends were assessed using Poisson regression models. Multivariable models were fitted to predict the likelihood of a patient undergoing ERCP, percutaneous or surgical drainage, or no drainage.

RESULTS

A weighted estimate of 248,942 patients admitted for cholangitis was identified. Overall, 131,052 patients were treated with ERCP (52.6%), 10,486 with percutaneous drainage (4.2%) and 12,460 with surgical drainage (5.0%); 43.0% did not receive drainage during the admission. Temporal trends between 1998 and 2009 showed a decline in surgical and percutaneous drainage, and a rise in ERCP. In multivariable analyses adjusted for clustering, ERCP and percutaneous drainage were more often performed in institutions with a high volume of admissions for cholangitis, those with a greater bed number and hospitals located in urban areas.

CONCLUSION

Over the past decade, the use of surgical and percutaneous drainage has decreased while that of ERCP has risen. Patients treated at institutions with a low volume of admissions for cholangitis, small bed number and in rural areas were less likely to undergo ERCP or percutaneous drainage.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective

Management strategy for common bile duct (CBD) stones is controversial with several treatment options if stones in the CBD are recognized intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to report our experience with same-session combined endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and CBD stones. We retrospectively evaluated 31 patients with cholecystolithiasis and CBD stones undergoing same-session combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Same-session ERCP and sphincterotomy were performed in all patients, and stone extraction was successfully performed in 29 patients (93%) with 2 failures (7%) due to impacted stones. In 8 patients (26%), the laparoscopic procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy because of dense adhesions or unclear anatomy. Two patients (7%) developed mild pancreatitis postoperatively and no other morbidity or mortality. In conclusion, same-session ERCP with stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be a safe and effective treatment strategy for CBD stones.

Intraoperative ERCP: What role does it have in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

In the treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis (CBDS) detected during intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), or when the preoperative study of a patient at intermediate risk for CBDS cannot be completed due to the lack of imaging techniques required for confirmation, or if they are available and yield contradictory radiological and clinical results, patients can be treated using intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the laparoscopic treatment or postoperative ERCP if the IOC finds CBDS. The choice of treatment depends on the level of experience and availability of each option at each hospital. Intraoperative ERCP has the advantage of being a single-stage treatment and has a significant success rate, an easy learning curve, low morbidity involving a shorter hospital stay and lower costs than the two-stage treatments (postoperative and preoperative ERCP). Intraoperative ERCP is also a good salvage treatment when preoperative ERCP fails or when total laparoscopic management also fails.

Single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP: management of patients with possible choledocholithiasis and gallbladder in situ in a non-tertiary Spanish hospital

BACKGROUND

The best way to reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications is not to perform it if it is unnecessary. Both intraoperative and postoperative ERCP rely on use of intraoperative cholangiography as a final diagnostic test for choledocholithiasis (CLD) whenever clinical data are unable to rule out CLD. Intraoperative ERCP could become a therapeutic option when a previous preoperative ERCP fails. We present our experience with intraoperative ERCP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a descriptive and prospective study of a cohort of 82 patients with moderate risk of CLD. They were operated on by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). We performed intraoperative ERCP using the rendezvous technique.

RESULTS

Thirty-six out of 82 patients had an abnormal IOC study. Mean age was 58.7 years (standard deviation, SD 16.6, 25-83 years), and 60.6% were females. Ultrasound study showed that 51.4% of patients had a dilated bile duct. Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) was performed on three patients (8.3%). The success rate of intraoperative ERCP was 88.2%. Three out of the 36 patients (8.8%) had ERCP complications [2 mild papillary bleeding (5.8%), 1 acute pancreatitis (2.9%)]. The rate of conversion to open surgery was 5% with a surgical complications rate of 4% [one injured duct and two surgical bleeding which required re-operation (2.5%)]. There were no mortalities. Four patients (11.1%) needed post-surgical ERCP, with a residual CLD rate of 5.6% (two patients) in the postoperative period. Mean surgical time was 181 min (SD 60, 75-345 min). Mean hospital stay was 6.2 days (SD 4.7, 2-24 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ERCP is an option to prevent performing ERCP unnecessarily on patients with moderate risk of CLD not confirmed using appropriate radiological studies. It can resolve the biliary disease in a single step with a similar success rate to standard ERCP, but with low morbidity, especially of acute pancreatitis. The residual CLD rate is also very low.

For patients with predicted low risk for choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, selective intraoperative cholangiography and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective strategy to limit unnecessary procedures

BACKGROUND

There is debate about whether intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) should be performed routinely or selectively during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. The timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in these patients also is an issue. We reviewed the experience in our center, where a management algorithm limiting ERCP in relation to LC was adopted.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed every LC performed by one surgeon during 6 years and the related ERCPs.

RESULTS

A total of 264 LCs were performed. In 30 patients, stones were cleared or excluded by preoperative ERCP. In the remaining 234 LCs, 31 of 34 IOCs were successfully performed. Two of 31 IOCs were positive for bile duct stones; stone removal was successful in each patient at subsequent ERCP. Only 10 of 201 patients who did not have IOC required postsurgical ERCP within 10 weeks of LC, 3 of whom had common bile duct stones at ERCP.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who underwent LC, we performed selective IOC with postoperative ERCP for positive studies. Review of our experience using this algorithm showed it to be a powerful tool in limiting unnecessary ERCPs. Our data suggest that routine preoperative ERCP cannot be justified. Selective IOC during LC misses relatively few cases of biliary stones; these can be managed quickly by experienced endoscopists.

Effect of medical or surgical admission on outcome of patients with gallstone pancreatitis and common bile duct stones

INTRODUCTION

Management of uncomplicated common bile duct stone (CBDS) and gallstone pancreatitis (GP) presumably varies based on whether a patient is admitted to medicine or surgery. This study evaluates the impact of admitting team on outcome and cost.

METHODS

Three hundred seventy patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital for CBDS or GP were retrospectively analyzed for demographics, insurance status, procedures, complications, length of stay, readmission, and cost. A multivariable analysis was conducted for outcome and cost measures.

RESULTS

Patients admitted to a surgical service were younger than those admitted to a medical service. Gender, race, tobacco use, and the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic renal insufficiency were not significantly different between groups. Patients admitted to a medical service had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease and diabetes. Despite lower readmission rates for surgical patients, there was no difference in total hospital days between groups. Though total cost of an initial surgical admission was greater than a medical admission, total cost attributable to the index admission diminished over time and ultimately was not significant in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite variations in uncomplicated management of CBDS and GP, there is no difference, in long-term follow-up, in the total number of hospital days or cost for the management of CBDS or GP based on admitting team practices.

An Economic Analysis of Hospital Charges for Choledocholithiasis by Different Treatment Strategies

The ideal management of presumed choledocholithiasis is controversial. We hypothesized that patients admitted with presumed choledocholithiasis would be better served financially to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with possible intraoperative intervention versus preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by LC. A chart review was performed from September 1, 2000 to August 31, 2003. One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients identified with presumed choledocholithiasis were reviewed. Six patients were excluded because of missing charge data. Professional and technical fees from the total hospital charges were used for comparison. Three groups of patients were compared for charge analysis. Group 1 underwent LC with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Group 2 underwent LC with preoperative or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Group 3 was a control group of LC only. Student's t test was used for statistical analysis with a P value of <0.05 defined as statistically significant. P values reflect comparisons with Group 1. Group 1 charges were $13,026, Group 2 charges were $15,303, and Group 3 charges were $9,122. For suspected choledocholithiasis, LC with intraoperative intervention is the most economically advantageous approach.

Laparoscopic transduodenal sphincteroplasty

BACKGROUND

Common bile duct stones are a difficult problem, often leading to conversion to an open operation or repeated endoscopic procedures. Both strategies are associated with added morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A new technique was developed to perform a traditional sphincteroplasty using minimally invasive methods. The procedure was performed on two patients with distal common bile duct stones; each patient had previously undergone at least two unsuccessful preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures by at least two different experienced endoscopists.

RESULTS

In both patients, a laparoscopic transduodenal sphincteroplasty was successfully completed. A transduodenal common bile duct exploration was performed at the time of sphincterotomy, successfully clearing the common bile duct in both cases. There were no untoward postoperative sequelae. Follow-up at one year was satisfactory in both patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic transduodenal sphincteroplasty can be safely performed in patients with common bile duct stones refractory to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This technique offers a new approach to the management of common bile duct stones, and can spare patients the need for an open operation or subsequent endoscopic procedures.

Low incidence of retained common bile duct stones using a selective policy of biliary imaging

AIM

Biliary imaging has decreased since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study aimed to examine the incidence of retained common bile duct (CBD) stones, using a selective policy of biliary imaging.

METHODS

A prospective computerised database was used to study patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by one surgeon over 36 months. Two hundred and thirty-five patients (191 female, 44 male) were operated on. Ages ranged from 15 to 82 years (mean 47 years). Follow-up periods ranged from six to 39 months (mean 23.3 months). Selection for pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatogram (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) or neither depended on liver function tests (LFTs) and CBD diameter on ultrasound prior to surgery. If LFTs were persistently raised and/or the CBD was dilated on ultrasound, patients underwent pre-operative ERCP. If LFTs were raised, and returned to normal promptly, IOC was performed.

RESULTS

Of 235 patients, 26 had pre-operative ERCP, 62 had IOC and 157 had neither. Ten patients had both ERCP and IOC. To date, one patient (0.43%) has radiologically-proven unsuspected retained CBD stones; these were successfully treated with ERCP.

CONCLUSION

Selective biliary imaging in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe. This process identifies the majority of patients with ductal calculi and minimises the need for unnecessary ERCP and peroperative cholangiography.

Preoperative evaluation of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to suggest criteria for selection of a preoperative diagnostic technique for patients with gallstone disease.

CONCLUSION

Use of MR cholangiography preferentially before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, on patients who have a moderate or high risk of common bile duct stones, can significantly reduce purely diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

The advent of endoscopic techniques changed surgery in many ways. For the management of cholelithiasis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the treatment of choice. This has created a dilemma in the management of choledocholithiasis. Today a number of option exist, including endoscopic sphinterotomy (ES) before LC in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones, laparoscopic bile duct exploration, open CBD exploration, and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Also, the alternative technique of peroperative ES is emerging.

METHODS

We report our experience of routine intraoperative cholangiography followed either by peroperative ERCP in one step or by transcystic drain and postoperative ERCP. In our technique, to facilitate Vater papilla cannulation we inserted a 450-cm transcystic guidewire that was caught by a duodenoscope. Papillotome was then inserted over the guidewire to ensure cannulation of the CBD.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were treated successfully in one step and 24 in two steps. The mean operative time was 181 +/- 41 min for patients treated in one step and 131 +/- 30 min for patients treated in two steps. The mean hospital stay was 4.8 +/- 3.3 days for patients treated in one step and 9.6 +/- 4.0 days for patients treated in two steps. Five patients (18%) with positive intraoperative cholangiography for stones for whom peroperative ERCP was not available showed a normal postoperative transcystic cholangiogram and therefore ERCP was canceled. Fourteen of 25 patients treated in one step and none of 17 treated in two steps had raised serum amylase, which resolved spontaneously with no symptoms. No patient developed postoperative pancreatitis. Three (10%) ERCP complications were observed, consisting of mild bleeding of the papilla. All cases were managed by endoscopic adrenaline injection. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

We believe peroperative ERCP with the technique described should be considered as the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis associated with cholelithiasis. When single-stage treatment is not possible, a two-step rendezvous technique should be preferred.

Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct stenting in the management of common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with common bile duct stones associated with stones in the gall bladder remains controversial.

METHODS

Over the three-year period from 1996 to 1999, patients with cholelithiasis and known choledocholithiasis, or choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were initially treated by placing a stent across the sphincter of Oddi. The stent was pushed along a guide wire through the cystic duct and then down the common bile duct, before the cystic duct was closed. Subsequently, the stent was used to facilitate performance of a needle knife endoscopic sphincterotomy. The stent was then removed, a cholangiography was performed and the common bile duct was cleared. Patients with persistent jaundice usually had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

RESULTS

Transcystic stenting was the 'intention-to-treat' basis of therapy for 56 of the patients. The placement of the stent only failed once when the stent became trapped in the cystic duct. Complications of the operation included: pain and jaundice (n = 2), cholangitis (n = 1), and pulmonary embolus (n = 1). The median postoperative hospitalization was 2 days (range: 1-15). Five further patients had common bile duct stones removed via a choledochotomy; a stent was placed through the choledochotomy before its closure. The selective common bile duct cannulation rate at the first endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, was 98%. A second endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was required in 15% of patients. The only complication of all the endoscopic procedures was a single case of mild cholangitis; there were no cases of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

A treatment option open to all surgeons for non-jaundiced patients with known choledocholithiasis or choledocholithiasis found at operative cholangiogram, is the transcystic stenting of the sphincter of Oddi at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. At a subsequent sitting, the common bile duct can be safely cleared endoscopically using a sphincterotomy facilitated by the stent.

Endolaparoscopic rendezvous treatment: a satisfying therapeutic choice for cholecystocholedocolithiasis

BACKGROUND

There are many different strategies for the treatment of the main bile duct lithiasis. When lithiasis of the biliary tract is suspected at a preoperative stage, we can treat patients with sequential treatment: endoscopic netrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. If common bile duct-lithiasis is recognized at an intraoperative stage, many options for treatment exist, one of which is intraoperative retrograde endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) (laparoendorendezvous).

METHODS

We report our experience using the aforementioned technique with 58 patients affected by cholelithiasis and complex Common bile duct disease who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative ES consecutively from March 1996 to May 2000. Of the 58 patients, 43 were affected by cholecystocholedocolithiasis: 12 by previously described lithiasis plus stenosant papillitis, 2 also by a pancreas head cancer, and 1 by cancer of the papilla.

RESULTS

The combined technique was performed in 86% of the cases. Six patients required conversion to open surgery. In two other patients, laparoscopic choledocotomy was performed with positioning of a Kehr-tube for an ampulla-impacted lithiasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ES offers a valid approach to the treatment of cholecystocholedocolithiasis in one session. Furthermore, it represents a valid alternative to transcholedocical laparoscopic treatment of cholelithiasis and complex common bite duct pathology.

Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% of patients with symptomatic gallstones may have associated common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, the predictive value of noninvasive tests as well as the preoperative diagnosis and management of CBDS have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to define an accurate and simple model for the prediction and management of CBDS.

METHODS

A prospective database containing 986 cholecystectomies performed from 1994 through 1999 was evaluated. Univariate analysis using the Pearson chi-square test was performed to determine the factors significantly related to the presence of CBDS. Then logistic regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis to discover independent predictors.

RESULTS

Of the 986 patients in this study, 48 (5%) had CBDS. Of the 48 patients with choledocholithiasis, 22 (46%) were men and 26 (54%) were women. The mean age was 55.3 years (range, 16-87 years). As a result of multivariate analysis, abdominal ultrasonographic findings suggestive of CBDS (common bile duct diameter exceeding 8 mm or visible stones), total bilirubin, and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase levels above normal were the independent predictors of CBDS in patients age 70 or younger. On the other hand, an elevated bilirubin level was found to be the single independent factor related to CBDS in the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with gallstones, suggestive ultrasonographic findings in those younger than 71 years and elevated direct or total bilirubin level in those older than 70 years are the most valuable and practical predictors of CBDS, and thus are the proper indications for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of triage guidelines for patients with cholelithiasis and suspected choledocholithiasis, incorporating selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

ERCP is the most frequently used modality for the diagnosis and resolution of choledocholithiasis before LC. MRC has recently emerged as an accurate, noninvasive modality for the detection of choledocholithiasis. However, useful strategies for implementing this diagnostic modality for patient evaluation before LC have not been investigated.

METHODS

During a 16-month period, the authors prospectively evaluated all patients before LC using triage guidelines incorporating patient information obtained from clinical evaluation, serum chemistry analysis, and abdominal ultrasonography. Patients were then assigned to one of four groups based on the level of suspicion for choledocholithiasis (group I, extremely high; group 2, high; group 3, moderate; group 4, low). Group 1 patients underwent ERCP and clearance of common bile duct stones; group 2 patients underwent MRC; group 3 patients underwent LC with intraoperative cholangiography; and group 4 patients underwent LC without intraoperative cholangiography.

RESULTS

Choledocholithiasis was detected in 43 of 440 patients (9.8%). The occurrence of choledocholithiasis among patients in the four groups were 92.6% (25/27), 32.4% (12/37), 3.8% (2/52), and 0.9% (3/324) for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P <.001). MRC was used for 8.4% (37/440) of patients. Patient triage resulted in the identification of common bile duct stones during preoperative ERCP in 92.3% (36/39) of the patients. Unsuspected common bile duct stones occurred in six patients (1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of choledocholithiasis can be accurately assessed based on information obtained during the initial noninvasive evaluation. Stratification of risks for choledocholithiasis facilitates patient management with the most appropriate diagnostic studies and interventions, thereby improving patient care and resource utilization.

A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

We set out to review and evaluate the results of an algorithm for managing choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We performed retrospective review of patients with choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between March 1993 and August 1999. All patients were operated on under the direction of one surgeon (M.E.A), following a consistent algorithm that relies primarily on laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (TCCBDE) but uses laparoscopic choledochotomy (LCD) when the duct and stones are large or if the ductal anatomy is suboptimal for TCCBDE. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy (ERS) is done if sphincterotomy is required to facilitate common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is utilized when this fails. Preoperative ERCP is used only for high-risk patients.

RESULTS

A total of 728 LC were performed, and there were 60 instances (8.2%) of choledocholithiasis. Primary procedures consisted of 47 TCCBDE; 37 of them required no other treatment. In five cases, the stones were flushed with no exploration. Intraoperative ERS was performed three times as the only form of duct exploration. LCD was utilized twice; one case also required intraoperative ERS, and the other had a postoperative ERCP for stent removal. One patient with small stones was observed, with no sequelae. Preoperative ERCP was done twice as the primary procedure. Of the 10 cases that were not completely cleared by TCCBDE, three had a postoperative ERCP and seven had an intraoperative ERS, one of which required a postoperative ERCP. There were three complications (6%) related to CBDE, with no long-term sequelae. There were four postoperative complications (6.7%) and no deaths. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.12. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 days (range, 0-14).

CONCLUSIONS

Choledocholithiasis can be managed safely by laparoscopic techniques, augmenting with ERCP as necessary. This protocol minimizes the number of procedures and decreases the hospital stay.

Tratamento cirúrgico postergado da pancreatite aguda biliar

A análise do tratamento cirúrgico de doentes portadores de pancreatite biliar mostra a existência de controvérsias em relação à oportunidade da intervenção, principalmente se deve ser precoce ou postergada. Do mesmo modo, a possibilidade do emprego de procedimentos endoscópicos no pré, intra ou pós-operatório e o advento da videolaparoscopia, trouxeram novos aspectos à discussão. Não existe consenso sobre a escolha da melhor conduta. Em função disso, analisamos retrospectivamente os resultados imediatos de 107 doentes portadores de forma leve de pancreatite, todos com menos de três sinais de gravidade, segundo o critério de estratificação proposto por Ranson, e que foram submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico postergado na mesma internação, no período de janeiro de 1988 a maio de 1999, tanto por via convencional como por via laparoscópica. Desses, 80 doentes (75%) eram do sexo feminino, 90% da raça branca e a média de idade foi de 46 anos. Os doentes foram operados em média após 9,5 dias de internação e receberam alta hospitalar após 2,9 dias, o que resultou numa permanência hospitalar média de 12,6 dias. A colangiografia intra-operatória foi realizada em 102 casos (96%) e a colangiografia endoscópica pré-operatória em 24 doentes (22,4%). Os resultados mostraram incidência de coledocolitíase em 25 casos (23%), taxa de morbidade de 12% e mortalidade nula. Dos 107 casos estudados, 64 (60%) foram operados pela via de acesso convencional e 43 (40%) pela via laparoscópica. A comparação dos resultados entre as vias de acesso empregadas mostrou diferença estatística significante em relação ao intervalo de tempo pós-operatório, que foi menor nos doentes submetidos à via de acesso laparoscópica. Concluímos, assim, que o tratamento cirúrgico postergado de doentes portadores de pancreatite biliar na forma leve apresenta baixas morbidade e mortalidade e pode ser feito tanto pela via convencional como pela via laparoscópica. A presença de coledocolitíase, nesta casuística, não contribuiu para aumentar os índices de complicações pós-operatórias e nem a mortalidade.

Role of biliary scintiscan in predicting the need for cholangiography

BACKGROUND

Currently used predictors for bile duct calculi in patients undergoing cholecystectomy have low specificity resulting in unnecessary cholangiograms being performed. The role of biliary scintiscan in predicting the presence of bile duct calculi was assessed.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were studied prospectively regard- ing the value of a history of jaundice or acute pancreatitis, raised serum bilirubin and serum alkaline phosphatase levels, and visualization of stones or presence of dilated bile ducts on ultrasonography (standard criteria) in detecting bile duct calculi. Results of biliary scintiscan were evaluated against a combination of standard criteria. The 'gold standard' for evaluation was endoscopic or peroperative cholangiography.

RESULTS

Biliary scintiscan had a higher sensitivity and specificity (93 and 94 per cent) than a combination of the above standard and modified predictors for biliary calculi (89 and 71 per cent). A combination of ultrasonography and selective use of scintiscan, in the absence of bile duct dilatation only, had higher values (96 and 98 per cent).

CONCLUSION

A combination of ultrasonography and biliary scintiscan can accurately predict bile duct calculi and could be used as a guide for selective cholangiography.

Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Determining the most appropriate management approach for patients with unsuspected choledocholithiasis may be difficult because of the subjective nature of this decision in the absence of clinical data. Treatment of incidental choledocholithiasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy was reviewed during a 25-month period. Operative cholangiograms were analyzed retrospectively to determine if associations exist between common bile duct stone characteristics and the intraoperative treatment selected by the operating surgeon. Cholangiographic data included quantification of common bile duct stones, stone dimension, position, and presence of radiopaque contrast flow into the duodenum. Two hundred thirty-six laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients underwent operative cholangiography; 25 (11%) demonstrated choledocholithiasis. Seven patients were converted to open common bile duct exploration (group I), 16 patients were referred for postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (group II), and two patients were observed (group III). Evaluation of the operative cholangiograms revealed multiple common bile duct stones (>1) in 86% (6 of 7) in group I, 25% (4 of 16) in group II, and none in group III. All patients in group I had at least one stone larger than 5 ml in greatest diameter, whereas only 33% (6 of 18) in groups II and III combined had stones larger than 5 ml. Group I had significantly (P = 0.027) more representation of delayed or no contrast flow during operative cholangiography compared to groups II and III. The intraoperative decision to proceed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and rely on postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for stone retrieval rather than open common bile duct exploration was associated with (1) a single common bile duct stone, less than or equal to 5 ml in size on operative cholangiogram and (2) normal contrast flow into the duodenum. Open common bile duct exploration was more frequently associated with the demonstration of multiple or large (>5 ml) stones. A periampullary stone did not discriminate among treatment choices.

The efficacy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection and clearance of choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography has been reported to have a high success rate in the detection and treatment of choledocholithiasis. Although there is growing enthusiasm for laparoscopic common bile duct clearance, many patients who present with gallbladder disease and suspected choledocholithiasis have endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performed with choledocholithiasis cleared if detected. These patients are then referred for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and clearance of bile duct stones at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients at this institution who underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 1997 through July 1998.

RESULTS

Common bile duct stones were detected endoscopically in 12 of 17 (71%) patients. We found serum bilirubin level to be the best predictor of choledocholithiasis. In 12 of 12 procedures, the endoscopist performed an endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction and reported a fully cleared common bile duct. Intraoperative cholangiogram performed during subsequent cholecystectomy revealed choledocholithiasis in 4 of these 12 patients. Laparoscopic techniques successfully cleared the choledocholithiasis in 3 of these patients with open techniques necessary in the fourth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that even after presumed successful endoscopic clearance of the bile duct stones, many patients (33% in our series) still have choledocholithiasis present at the time of cholecystectomy. We recommend intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy even after presumed successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with further intervention, preferably laparoscopic, to clear the choledocholithiasis as deemed necessary.

Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction should be performed routinely before surgery or'selectively after surgery in patients with mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The role and timing of ERCP in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis remains controversial. Routine preoperative ERCP identifies persisting CBD stones but carries risks of complications and may delay definitive care. Selective postoperative ERCP, performed only if a CBD stone is seen on intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), avoids unnecessary ERCP but risks unsuccessful stone extraction.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized study of consecutive patients with gallstone pancreatitis was conducted. Using previously determined criteria, patients with acute cholangitis or necrotizing pancreatitis were excluded. Patients considered at high risk for persisting CBD stones (CBD size > or =8 mm on admission ultrasound, serum total bilirubin > or = 1.7 mg/dL, or serum amylase > or = 150 U/L on hospital day 4) were randomly assigned to routine preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy with selective postoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy only if a CBD stone was present on IOC. Primary end points were costs, length of hospital stay, and the combined treatment failure rates (failure of diagnostic ERCP and IOC, complications of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy, and complications of surgery).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four consecutive patients with gallstone pancreatitis were evaluated prospectively for study eligibility. Sixty patients met the randomization criteria. Thirty patients were randomized to routine preoperative ERCP and 29 patients to selective postoperative ERCP (1 patient refused). Age, admission laboratory values, and APACHE II and Imrie scores were similar in both groups. By protocol, ERCP was performed in all patients in the preoperative ERCP group. In the postoperative ERCP group, ERCP was necessary in only 7 of 29 patients (24%). Mean hospital stay was significantly longer in the routine preoperative ERCP group (11.7 days) than in the selective postoperative ERCP group (9.0 days). Mean total cost was higher in the preoperative ERCP group ($9,426) than in the postoperative ERCP group ($7,798). The combined treatment failure rate was 10% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis without cholangitis, selective postoperative ERCP and CBD stone extraction is associated with a shorter hospital stay, less cost, no increase in combined treatment failure rate, and significant reduction in ERCP use compared with routine preoperative ERCP.

Endoscopic management of biliary tract disease

Endoscopic management of biliary tract disease continues to be influenced by new advances in technology and shaped by further examination of old controversies. This review covers and highlights recent world literature concerning biliary endoscopy and its effect on the management of biliary disorders. In particular, we examine the role and consequence of the endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis and the continuing controversy over endoscopic treatment of pancreatic disease. The increasing impact of endoscopic ultrasound in the biliary tree is explored, as well as the latest developments in biliary stent technology.

Management of Bile Duct Stones in 1572 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Evidence of bile duct stones (BDSs) was identified on routine cholangiogram in 136 (8.7%) of 1572 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy from March 1989 through March 1997. Forty-two (30.9%) were unsuspected. All patients with evidence of BDSs underwent laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE). Initially, a standard choledochotomy with T-tube drainage as in the open approach was used. Later, transcystic duct exploration was added to the algorithm. The algorithm evolved into an ongoing treatment protocol study that was initiated in March 1992. Through March 1997, 100 patients underwent LBDE based on the protocol. The study is divided into two groups. Group A comprises the total 136 patients undergoing LBDE, including those in the protocol study. A subgroup, Group B, comprises only the 100 patients in the protocol study. In Group A, LBDE was successful in 114 patients (83.8%). Stones were missed in seven patients and left behind for spontaneous passage or later retrieval in six patients. Eleven patients (8.1%) were converted to open. There were 13 major complications (9.6%), including the seven missed stones and two deaths. In Group B, LBDE was successful in 94 per cent. Stones were missed in one patient and intentionally left behind in four patients. One patient was converted to open. There were seven major complications (7%), including one of the missed stones and one death. Using the protocol algorithm and the techniques described, BDSs can be effectively managed laparoscopically at the time of cholecystectomy in approximately 94 per cent of cases.

Laparoscopic biliary surgery

Treatment of gallstones by laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become standard therapy over the past decade and has received wide patient acceptance. Problems are infrequent but those such as biliary injury may be serious and continue to be a cause of concern. Biliary injury is more likely when surgery is performed in the presence of acute inflammation. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration is becoming standardized and the results are good. The role of other laparoscopic biliary procedures such as biliary bypass is still uncertain.

Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis

Although experience with laparoscopic approaches to common duct stones is increasing, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed either before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains the most common approach. Debate remains as to the best timing for ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Because clinical, laboratory, and radiological data are poor predictors of choledocholithiasis, many ERCPs done before LC give negative results. ERCP performed after LC with a positive intraoperative cholangiogram (i.o.p.) would eliminate many unnecessary preoperative endoscopic studies. This is a retrospective analysis of the treatment of choledocholithiasis with the combination of LC and ERCP. All patients included could have had ERCP preoperatively or postoperatively; therefore, those with cholangitis requiring emergent preoperative ERCP were excluded. Two groups of patients were compared: those who underwent ERCP followed by LC and those who underwent LC and IOC followed by ERCP. No significant differences were found with respect to age, gender, health status, clinical presentation, laboratory values (most liver functions, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and serum amylase), surgery time, blood loss, ERCP time, time between treatment modalities, and days to regular diet. However, the preoperative ERCP group was found to have a longer hospital stay (6.7 days vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.003) and higher hospital cost ($9,406.39 vs. $12,816.23, p = 0.05). The preoperative ERCP group had two patients requiring two ERCPs to clear the common duct, one patient requiring conversion to open procedure because of failed LC, and four minor complications. The postoperative ERCP group had no failed LC, IOC, or postoperative ERCPs and one minor complication. The rate of false positive IOC was 6.7% and of negative preoperative ERCP, 43%. We conclude that in the absence of cholangitis requiring emergent endoscopic decompression, suspected choledocholithiasis can be successfully managed first with LC, ERCP being reserved for patients with a positive IOC. This eliminates many negative preoperative ERCPs.

The prediction of common bile duct stones using a neural network

BACKGROUND

The role of preoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in the diagnosis and treatment of suspected common bile duct stones (CBDS) in the laparoscopic age is controversial. The preoperative diagnosis of CBDS by ERCP and the removal of CBDS by ES are advantageous because of technical difficulties in performing laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Approximately 50% of preoperative ERCP examinations are normal, however. The noninvasive diagnosis of CBDS has assumed new importance, but it has proved to be an elusive goal. Neural networks are a form of artificial computer intelligence that have been used successfully to interpret ECGs and to diagnose myocardial infarcts. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a neural network could be trained to predict CBDS accurately in patients at high risk of having duct stones.

STUDY DESIGN

We trained a back-propagation neural network to predict the presence of CBDS. Retrospective data from patients who had a cholecystectomy and either a preoperative ERCP or intraoperative cholangiogram were used to build the network, and it was tested using unseen data.

RESULTS

One hundred forty patients were used to train the network, and 16 patients were used to test it. The trained network was able to predict CBDS in 100% of the patients in both the training and test sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening of high-risk patients for CBDS by neural network analysis is highly accurate. This promising new, noninvasive, and inexpensive technique can potentially decrease the need for preoperative ERCP by 50%, but additional prospective evaluation is indicated.

Assessment of indicators for predicting choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

The objective of this report was to study the sensitivity of indicators used for predicting bile duct stones and their endoscopic removal before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 104 patients who successfully underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Riyadh Medical Complex between 1992 and 1994 (1412H-1414H). Six indicatorsâjaundice, biliary pancreatitis, stones in bile duct on sonography, dilated bile duct (>7 mm) on ultrasonography, dilated bile duct with deranged liver function test, and deranged liver function test without jaundiceâwere used for suspecting choledocholithiasis and endoscopic removal before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

Ultrasound correctly predicted bile duct stone in 75%, followed by dilated bile duct with deranged liver function test (46%). Clinical jaundice and biliary pancreatitis were equally sensitive indicators (42% each). Sensitivity of only dilated bile duct on ultrasonography in predicting duct stone was 36%. Deranged liver function without jaundice was the least sensitive (22%) of the predictors. Overall, these indicators correctly diagnosed bile duct stones in 34% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Until laparoscopic exploration of bile duct or a noninvasive technique, such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatogram (MRCP), is widely available, these predictors will help in selecting patients with bile duct stones for preoperative removal. Other workers have suggested combining these indicators to improve the predictive value.

Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

We report our experience of selective cholangiography in a series of laparoscopic cholecystectomies and evaluate the strategy of using "stricter criteria" to select preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCPs).

METHODS

A total of 1847 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analyzed for use of cholangiography. A high risk of common bile duct stones (bilirubin level more than 2 mg/dL, jaundice, alkaline phosphatase level more than 150 U/L, pancreatitis, or dilated bile duct and/or stone on ultrasound or CT) was an indication for preoperative ERCP. Selective intraoperative cholangiography was performed for intermediate risk of bile duct stones. The strategy of using "stricter criteria" (jaundice and/or demonstrated bile duct stones on ultrasound or CT) for selecting preoperative ERCP was evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Preoperative ERCP was performed in 135 patients (7.3%) and demonstrated bile duct stones in 43 (32%). Of 36 patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis alone, stones were found only in 6 patients (17%). Selective intraoperative cholangiography was performed in 87 (5%), and stones were found in 2 (2%); 67 (3.6%) postoperative ERCPs were performed for suspected choledocholithiasis, and stones were found in 21 (32%). Applying "stricter criteria" to select preoperative ERCP would predict ductal stones in 56%, whereas 3% of patients with stones would be missed, resulting in a 50% reduction in preoperative ERCPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in selected patients considered likely to have choledocholithiasis, the diagnostic yield of preoperative ERCP is low. Using "stricter criteria" to select patients for preoperative ERCP can avoid unnecessary ERCPs.

The management of choledocholithiasis in children in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice for gallbladder removal in children, the treatment of children who have choledocholithiasis remains unclear. For adults who have suspected choledocholithiasis, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-described and effective approach, however, its use for common bile duct stones in children has not been defined. The authors reviewed the records of 131 consecutive children undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy on two surgical services to define the efficacy of ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in managing choledocholithiasis in children. Fourteen children were suspected of having common duct stones noted on preoperative ultrasound scan and laboratory data. At ERCP, six children had no stones visualized; eight had stones and underwent stone extraction and sphincter dilation or sphincterotomy. All 14 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy a mean of 3.8 days after ERCP. None of the 14 had evidence of retained stones. Only one of 117 children undergoing primary laparoscopic cholecystectomy had unsuspected common bile duct stones and was treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone removal. A management plan incorporating ERCP followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective strategy for children who have choledocholithiasis.

What predicts gastroenterologists' and surgeons' diagnosis and management of common bile duct stones?

BACKGROUND

Because the literature suggests numerous indicators of common bile duct stones, we undertook a systematic assessment of physicians' judgments of the clinical utility of eight indicators: patient age, history of jaundice, history of pancreatitis, levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, and total bilirubin, and common bile duct diameter on ultrasonography.

METHODS

Random samples of 1500 gastroenterologists and 1500 surgeons were sent a survey asking them to indicate the importance of each potential indicator of common bile duct stones, the likelihood of common bile duct stones for each of nine clinical vignettes, and whether they would order a preoperative ERCP. An abbreviated survey was sent to nonrespondents.

RESULTS

Although there was substantial variation in the importances assigned to each indicator, the most important indicators were serum total bilirubin and diameter of common bile duct on ultrasound. The best predictors of the decision to order an ERCP were perceived likelihood of stones and specialty. The average threshold for ordering an ERCP was 37%. Respondents did not differ from nonrespondents in the perceived importance of the eight indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial variation among gastroenterologists and surgeons regarding the optimal approach to common bile duct stones has clinical implications. Patients will receive varying recommendations for care, depending on whom they see.

Evaluation of the pattern of liver tests and yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The role of ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis in an era of minimally invasive therapy continues to be defined.

METHODS

We evaluated prospectively the pattern of liver test abnormalities and yield of cholangiography after presentation with illnesses suggesting choledocholithiasis. Ninety-four consecutive patients, all with liver test abnormalities (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, and ALT) at presentation, had serial determinations to within 24 hours of cholangiography and were divided into four groups based on their patterns of rise or fall of liver test results as well as presenting clinical syndrome. Group I: normalized liver tests; Group II: falling liver tests, and alkaline phosphatase falling greater than 50% of the difference between presentation value and upper limit of normal; Group III: alkaline phosphatase falling less than 50%; and Group IV: any liver test with increasing levels. Clinical syndromes included cholangitis, pancreatitis, combined cholangitis and pancreatitis, and biliary pain with abnormal liver tests.

RESULTS

Yields of choledocholithiasis were 13% (Group I), 50% (Group II), 67% (Group III), and 94% (Group IV). Yield by syndromes were 36% (biliary pancreatitis), 72% (biliary pain and abnormal liver tests), 87% (cholangitis), and 100% (cholangitis and pancreatitis).

CONCLUSION

The degree of decline in liver test levels is inversely related to the yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis; the yield of ERCP in these patients (with normalized liver tests) is low and they do not require ERCP. Pre-ERCP estimates of the likelihood of choledocholithiasis can be made on the basis of the pattern of liver tests, and biliary pancreatitis patients with normalized liver tests do not require ERCP.

Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The decision of whether or not to investigate for common bile duct stones before cholecystectomy utilizes clinical, laboratory, and radiologic information (indicators). There is tremendous individual variation among clinicians in the criteria used for making this decision. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of published data to estimate the performance characteristics of the most commonly used preoperative indicators of common bile duct stones.

METHODS

Using predetermined exclusion criteria, we selected articles from a MEDLINE search and bibliographic review. Weighted averages were used to determine summary sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each indicator for stones.

RESULTS

From 2221 citations identified, 22 studies met inclusion criteria. The 10 indicators examined were reported in a common fashion in three or more articles, and could be assessed preoperatively. Seven exhibited a specificity greater than 90%. Indicators with positive likelihood ratios of 10 or above were cholangitis, preoperative jaundice, and ultrasound evidence of common bile duct stones. Positive likelihood ratios for dilated common bile duct on ultrasound, hyperbilirubinemia, and jaundice ranged from almost 4 to almost 7. Elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase, pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and hyperamylasemia exhibited positive likelihood ratios of less than 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis has identified indicators for duct stones and ranked them according to likelihood ratios. These findings can be applied as guidelines for whether to investigate for duct stones before cholecystectomy.

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era

OBJECTIVE

The authors reviewed the results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and intraoperative cholangiography in a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The indications for preoperative and postoperative ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography as adjuncts to laparoscopic cholecystectomy are evolving. The debate regarding the use of selective or routine intraoperative cholangiography has intensified with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the records of 343 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during a 1-year period. Historical, biochemical, and radiologic findings for the patients who underwent ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography were analyzed.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty- three patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the period reviewed. Preoperative ERCP was performed in 42 patients. Twenty-seven of these patients (64%) had common bile duct (CBD) stones, which were cleared with a sphincterotomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed for 101 patients (29%). Three cholangiograms had false- positive results (3%), leading to two CBD explorations, in which no CBD stones were found, and one normal ERCP. Six patients underwent postoperative ERCP, three for the removal of retained CBD stones (0.9%), all of which were cleared with a sphincterotomy. Fifteen patients had gallstone pancreatitis, six of whom had CBD stones (40%) that were cleared by ERCP. There were 33 complications (10%) and no CBD injuries.

CONCLUSION

The use of routine intraoperative cholangiography is discouraged in view of its low yield and the significant rate of false positive cholangiogram results.

Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era

BACKGROUND

Management options for common bile duct stones have explained in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), and selecting the most appropriate method for each patient can be problematic due to the difficulty of predicting accurately which patients have choledocholithiasis (CDL). In order to improve selection of appropriate treatment for CDL, treatment options were analyzed for outcome retrospectively during a 25-month period beginning June 1, 1992.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred four patients underwent LC; 48 (12%) had CDL identified at preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or intraoperative cholangiogram (IOCG). Forty-seven patients were referred for preoperative ERCP for suspected CDL, 23 (49%) of whom had proven duct stones and underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone retrieval with an 87% success rate.

RESULTS

Of 357 patients scheduled for LC without preoperative ERCP, 236 had IOCG, of which 25 (11%) demonstrated CDL. Seven patients had open common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Sixteen patients had postoperative ERCP after positive IOCG, 7 (44%) of which were positive for CDL and whose stones were removed with 100% success. Two patients were observed, anticipating spontaneous passage of a small stone.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative ERCP should be applied selectively. For the large majority of patients without preoperative evidence of CDL, we recommend routine IOCG; if CDL is demonstrated, an intraoperative decision can be made to proceed to postoperative ERCP in the usual case or to open CBDE for very large or multiple stones. Observation in anticipation of spontaneous passage may be appropriate for small, solitary common duct stones. Continuing advances in laparoscopic CBDE are likely to reduce further the need to rely on ERCP in managing CDL.

Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era

This study assessed the outcome of 342 patients with in situ gallbladders undergoing ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis. The result of ERCP was found to play a significant role (P < 0.0001) in determining whether patients were subsequently managed conservatively (n = 152) or underwent either laparoscopic (n = 110) or open (n = 80) surgery. Those undergoing laparoscopic surgery were noted to be younger (P = 0.0001) and were less likely to be jaundiced (P = 0.0015) or have CBD stones at ERCP (P = 0.0295). In 28 patients with CBD stones remaining after ERCP, pre- rather than postoperative timing of ERCP prevented a potential second operation. The current success rate of 85% in clearing CBD stones at ERCP cannot support a routine policy of intraoperative cholangiography followed by postoperative ERCP.

Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography and liver function tests for preoperative assessment of the bile duct

Current means of predicting the presence of bile duct stones are sensitive but produce a large number of false-positive results, potentially leading to added morbidity from unnecessary invasive investigation. This study prospectively assessed 545 patients with gallbladder stones, including 55 patients with bile duct stones, to refine criteria for further investigation of the bile duct. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for bile duct dilatation (diameter abnormal if larger than 5 mm below age 50 years, normal value increasing by 1 mm per decade) and elevation of three liver function tests, singly or in combination. Depending on the number of abnormalities used the sensitivity ranged from 46 to 96 per cent and the positive predictive value from 35 to 77 per cent. All groupings gave at least 96 per cent negative predictive value for the absence of stones but none combined both high sensitivity and positive predictive value. The specificity was improved if the tests were done on the working day before operation. Refining criteria for predicting bile duct stones allows the selective use of cholangiography and may reduce the number of negative cholangiograms.

Prospective evaluation in 121 consecutive unselected patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis

Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration was attempted in 115 of 121 consecutive unselected patients with choledocholithiasis (mean age 69 (range 21-92) years) found during routine intraoperative cholangiography. The CBD was successfully cleared of all stones in 100 patients (87 per cent). Ten of 11 patients referred for surgery after failure of endoscopic sphincterotomy had complete laparoscopic choledocholithiasis. Eleven patients (10 per cent) required conversion to open CBD exploration, and laparoscopic exploration was not attempted in six (5 per cent) because of inflammation or fibrosis. Postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy was required in four patients (4 per cent) for retained stones after laparoscopic exploration. There were no postoperative deaths (39 per cent of patients were aged 75 years or more). Routine intraoperative cholangiography, and when required laparoscopic CBD exploration, should be compared in randomized trials with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients

The role of noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy was prospectively evaluated in 1390 consecutive patients subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative common bile duct testing included liver chemistries, transcutaneous ultrasonography, and intravenous cholangiography. When indicated by various sets of abnormal studies, prelaparoscopic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was attempted in 129 patients (9.3%) and successfully accomplished in 122 (94.6%). Seventy-six patients (62.3%) had duct stones or a papillary stenosis, and 73 of them (96%) were treated successfully by endoscopic duct clearance and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No deaths occurred, and the morbidity rate was 6.2% (8/129), including 2 cases of pancreatitis and 1 case of a retained duct stone after sphincterotomy. Predicting the presence of common duct pathology was 60% accurate when based on abnormal laboratory test results alone, 69% when based on abnormal laboratory test results and concomitant radiologic abnormalities, and 42% when based on radiologic criteria alone (p < .05). We conclude that patients with altered serum liver chemistries with or without concomitant positive radiologic criteria should undergo endoscopic cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, in patients with radiologic duct dilatation as the sole indicator for duct stones, the frequency of normal findings in endoscopic examinations is high. This latter group is probably better managed with intraoperative cholangiography and postlaparoscopic sphincterotomy if needed.

Laparoscopic choledochoscopy with a small-caliber endoscope. A safe and effective technique for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Incidental choledocholithiasis has been reported in 4-5% of cases during routine cholangiography. Many surgeons have resisted laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as a time-consuming and technically frustrating procedure, preferring to send the patient for postoperative ERCP. The purpose of this study was to objectively assess the safety, efficacy, and facility of transcystic duct choledochoscopy using a small-caliber choledochoscope with facilitated insertion technique. Twenty-five consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were studied prospectively. Choledochoscopy was carried out with a simplified introducer system using a 6.9-French choledochoscope. An arbitrary limit of 10 min was established for gaining access to the common bile duct (CBD). Incidental CBD stones were found in two of the 25 procedures (8%) and were cleared laparoscopically. The CBD was successfully entered in 21 of 25 attempts (84%). The average time for the entire procedure was 8.7 min. There were no procedure-related complications. Clinical application of this procedure was reviewed in a personal series of 742 LCs. Transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCDE) was successful in clearing stones from the CBD 75% of the time and the addition of laparoscopic choledochotomy brought the success of LCDE to 81%. Excluding patients where transcystic LCDE was not attempted, the overall success rate was 91%.

Intraoperative cholangiography is not essential to avoid duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Whether or not to perform intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial. The decision to perform IOC should depend on the individual surgeon's preference for the management of choledocholithiasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An initial experience of 525 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy done without IOC is reviewed.

RESULTS

Suspected or proven choledocholithiasis was managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy if necessary. There were no bile duct injuries or bile leaks, and 9% (47) of patients underwent endoscopic investigation or treatment. There have been no secondary operations for duct stones.

CONCLUSION

We think that the use of IOC to avoid bile duct injuries is not essential, and that the key to avoiding such injuries is meticulous demonstration of anatomic detail at operation. We have been satisfied with selective use of endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy for the management of choledocholithiasis.

Traditional surgical management of common bile duct stones: a prospective study during a 20-year experience

PURPOSE

To analyze the operative findings and evaluate the hospital morbidity and mortality. This experience is documented in order to provide a basis for comparison with therapeutic alternatives.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective data were collected on 579 patients who underwent elective (n = 443) or emergent (n = 136) operations between 1970 and 1990. Their mean age was 60.1 years. Prior biliary symptoms were present in 96% and suggestive of choledocholithiasis in 69%. Acute pancreatitis was associated in 3%.

RESULTS

Cholecystectomy was performed with intraoperative cholangiography in 85% of cases. Stones were extracted via the cystic duct in 18%, through a choledochotomy in 79%, and through an additional sphincterotomy in 3%. Cholangioscopy has been routinely used since 1977. The incidence of extraction of the stones via the cystic duct increased and the incidence of biliary-enteric bypass decreased significantly during the second decade. Complications occurred in 24.5% of the patients. General complications were significantly fewer in the second decade than in the first (6% versus 15%). The main biliary complications were related to biliary tubes (5%) and retained stones (5%). Ten patients (2%) required early reoperation. The overall mortality rate was 0.3%. Mortality was 1.4% after emergency operations and zero after elective operations and in patients under 60 years of age. The mean stay was 16.6 +/- 7.2 days, decreasing with time.

CONCLUSION

Traditional open surgery is an effective and safe option for the management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. The choice between open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and endoscopic sphincterotomy should be made for each patient according to the local availability and efficacy of these methods.

Peroperative endoscopic sphincterotomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis

The development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has created a dilemma in the management of choledocholithiasis. A number of options exist, including endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) calculi, laparoscopic bile duct exploration, open CBD exploration and postoperative ES. None of these options has emerged as ideal or universally acceptable. An alternative technique, peroperative ES, has been developed. A prospective assessment of the use of peroperative ES in 13 patients in whom choledocholithiasis was demonstrated with operative cholangiography is presented. Eleven patients had successful ES and clearance of stones. The CBD could not be cannulated in one patient, and an adequate ES for stone extraction could not be performed in the remaining patient. Both procedures were converted to open CBD exploration. Complications were mild postoperative pancreatitis (two patients) and pulmonary atelectasis (one). The median total operating time was 165 min and the median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days. Peroperative ES at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides a safe technique for clearance of the CBD.

Appraisal of surgical and endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis

One hundred and ten patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones were treated in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology at SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India between January 1989 and December 1992. The primary modality of treatment was surgery in 62 patients (group I) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in 48 (group II). The two groups were well matched with respect to clinical features and presence of medical risk factors. Surgical clearance of CBD stones was achieved in 58 patients (93.5%; group Ia). Four patients (7%) had retained stones following surgery (group Ib). In group II, the CBD was cleared by endoscopic means in 20 out of 48 patients (42%) and was categorized into group IIa. In the remaining patients ES was followed by CBD exploration (group IIb). Significantly higher morbidity was seen in patients needing CBD surgery following attempted endoscopic clearance, because of ES-related complications, such as bleeding, cholangitis, septicaemia and numerous others. Use of ES to treat CBD stones on a routine basis was therefore not found to be any better than one-time surgical exploration.