Improved survival with neoadjuvant therapy and resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Outcome of Surgery for Oesophageal Carcinoma in a Low Volume Centre, with and without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

Aims:

To critically assess the outcome of surgery for oesophageal carcinoma, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods:

Since April 1998 until August 2002 resectable oesophageal cancer patients referred to us have received multimodal treatment, consisting of two courses of fluorouracil, cisplatin and hydroxyurea and 20 Gy of radiotherapy followed by surgery. The outcome of this treatment was compared to the outcome of a historical group of oesophageal cancer patients, treated with surgery alone in the time period 1994 to 1998. The patients represent a consecutive series of 20 resectable oesophageal carcinomas, referred to us since 1994. Four patients (20 %) were treated for squamocellular carcinoma, 16 (80 %) patients for adenocarcinoma.

Results:

Treatment related toxicity was low and there was no death attributable to the chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative hospital mortality (< 30 days) and morbidity rates were 10 % and 50 %, respectively. A complete pathological response (T0) occurred in two of the nine patients in the multimodal group (22 %). Overall median survival was 11 months. Median survival among patients in the multimodal group was 14 months, as compared with 7 months in the group treated with surgery alone (P = 0.041).

Conclusions:

Despite low volume, outcome of surgery for oesophageal carcinoma was acceptable.

p53 Mutation status predicts pathological response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The p53 gene promotes cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis upon DNA damage and is associated with chemo- and radiosensitivity of cancer cells. However, its clinical significance has not been confirmed, especially in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC). We investigated the correlation between p53 disorders (gene mutation and protein accumulation) and the effects of chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Biopsy specimens obtained before CRT (40-60 Gy; low-dose 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin) from 64 patients with locally advanced (T2-T4) ESCC were examined for p53 gene mutations (MT) of exons 4-9 by polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and protein accumulation by immunohistochemistry (IHC). These were correlated with the pathological effects of CRT and cause-specific survival.

RESULTS

Pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 21.9% (14/64) patients, who showed better survival than non-pCR patients (2-year survival 78.6% versus 40.5%, P = 0.007). p53 mutation (MT)+ and p53 IHC+ were observed in 31.3% (20/64) and 65.6% (42/64) patients, respectively, and each was significantly associated with non-pCR (P = 0.004 and 0.042, respectively). Combined evaluation of p53 MT and p53 IHC correlated well with pCR frequency, showing 0% (0/12) for MT+/IHC+, 0% (0/8) for MT+/IHC-, 20% (6/30) for MT-/IHC+ and 57.1% (8/14) for MT-/IHC-. These results indicate that presence of p53 mutations was associated with non-pCR regardless of IHC status, and that p53 immunoreactivity was helpful in predicting non-pCR among p53 mutation-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of ESCC biopsy specimens for p53 gene mutation can identify patients who will not achieve pCR by CRT. The results should be confirmed by large cohort prospective studies.

Survival effect of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study

PURPOSE

The role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NeoRT) before definitive surgery for esophageal cancer remains controversial. This study used a large population-based database to assess the effect of NeoRT on survival for patients treated with definitive surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival for patients with Stage T2-T4, any N, M0 (cT2-T4M0) esophageal cancer who had undergone definitive surgery between 1998 and 2004 were analyzed by querying the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated and univariate comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards survival regression multivariate analysis was performed with NeoRT, T stage (T2 vs. T3-T4), pathologic nodal status (pN0 vs. pN1), number of nodes dissected (>10 vs. </=10), histologic type (adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma), age (<65 vs. >/=65 years), and gender as covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 1,033 patients were identified. Of these, 441 patients received NeoRT and 592 underwent esophagectomy alone; 77% were men, 67% had adenocarcinoma, and 72% had Stage T3-T4 disease. The median OS and cause-specific survival were both significantly greater for patients who received NeoRT compared with esophagectomy alone (27 vs. 18 months and 35 vs. 21 months, respectively, p <0.0001). The 3-year OS rate was also significantly greater in the NeoRT group (43% vs. 30%). On multivariate analysis, NeoRT, age <65 years, adenocarcinoma histologic type, female gender, pN0 status, >10 nodes dissected, and Stage T2 disease were all independently correlated with increased OS.

CONCLUSION

These results support the use of NeoRT for patients with esophageal cancer. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Management of gastroesophageal tumors

The incidence of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction has increased in recent years. These tumors possess distinct pathophysiologic characteristics. Although the consensus is that an R0 resection (complete microscopic and macroscopic resection) is the goal when operating for curative intent, much controversy remains regarding other aspects of patient management. There is lack of consensus regarding the type of surgery to perform, the role and extent of lymphadenectomy, and the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Utilizing an evidence-based approach, this review article provides an overview of the management of gastroesophageal junction carcinomas with particular emphasis on current areas of controversy.

The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

EUS, CT, and positron emission tomography (PET) have all been used in the preoperative staging of esophageal cancer separately or in various combinations.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the value and role of EUS when used in conjunction with CT and PET imaging in staging cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center clinical trial.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Data were examined for 56 patients who concomitantly underwent examination with EUS, CT, and PET in a multimodality staging program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

EUS, CT, and PET were examined for their ability to detect the primary tumor, local tumor stage, locoregional adenopathy, and distant metastases. With use of surgical resection as baseline therapy, the frequency at which EUS, CT, and PET affected and changed management was examined.

RESULTS

EUS is the only imaging test that identified all primary tumors and provided tumor staging. EUS identified a significantly greater number of patients (58.9%) with locoregional nodes than did CT (26.8%), P = .0006, or PET (37.5%), P = .02. CT identified 14.3% and PET identified 26.8% of patients with distant metastases. With CT alone, 15.2% of patients were not taken to surgery, whereas PET affected management by preventing surgery because of metastatic disease in 28.3% of patients. EUS changed management by guiding the need for neoadjuvant therapy in 34.8% of patients.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study, nonblinded study, lack of pathologic reference standard.

CONCLUSION

The primary strength of EUS in a multimodality staging strategy is in identifying patients with locally advanced disease and guiding the need for preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. EUS is not suited to determine resectability of esophageal cancer alone and thus is most effective when used in conjunction with other imaging tests such as CT and PET.

Phase II study of preoperative paclitaxel/cisplatin with radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy may improve the response rates and survival in patients with localized esophageal cancer. We evaluated paclitaxel-based induction chemoradiotherapy in patients with localized esophageal cancer to determine its feasibility, clinical response, pathologic response, and overall survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1995 and 1998, 50 patients were enrolled in this study. At study entry, patients were categorized as either resectable or unresectable according to evaluation by an experienced thoracic surgeon. All patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on Day 1, 29 with radiotherapy to 3,000 cGy in 15 fractions. Resectable patients underwent esophagectomy 4 weeks later. Postoperatively, patients received two cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on Day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg on Days 1-3, given every 28 days. Patients who were deemed unsuitable for resection from the outset continued radiotherapy to a total dose of 6,000 cGy.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients, all began neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 40 patients underwent surgery, and 25 patients completed postoperative chemotherapy. A pathologic complete response was seen in 7 patients (17.5%). Patients with a pathologic response had a median survival of 32.4 months vs. 14.4 months for nonresponders (p < 0.001). Patients with a clinical response had a median survival of 25.2 months compared with 15.6 months for nonresponders (p = 0.002). At a median follow up of 19.8 months (range 2.4-100.8), the median survival was 20.4 months and the 3-year overall survival rate was 23.2%.

CONCLUSION

Although preoperative cisplatin/paclitaxel with 3,000 cGy was tolerable, this multimodality regimen did not appear to be superior to standard cisplatin/5-fluorouracil-containing regimens and its use is not recommended.

Genetic variations in radiation and chemotherapy drug action pathways predict clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Understanding how specific genetic variants modify drug action pathways may provide informative blueprints for individualized chemotherapy.

METHODS

We applied a pathway-based approach to examine the impact of a comprehensive panel of genetic polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in 210 esophageal cancer patients.

RESULTS

In the Cox proportional hazards model, MTHFR Glu429Ala variant genotypes were associated with significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.89) in patients treated with fluorouracil (FU). The 3-year survival rates for patients with the variant genotypes and the wild genotypes were 65.26% and 46.43%, respectively. Joint analysis of five polymorphisms in three FU pathway genes showed a significant trend for reduced recurrence risk and longer recurrence-free survival as the number of adverse alleles decreased (P = .004). For patients receiving platinum drugs, the MDR1 C3435T variant allele was associated with significantly reduced recurrence risk (HR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.64) and improved survival (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.85). In nucleotide excision repair genes, there was a significant trend for a decreasing risk of death with a decreasing number of high-risk alleles (P for trend = .0008). In base excision repair genes, the variant alleles of XRCC1 Arg399Gln were significantly associated with the absence of pathologic complete response (odds ratio = 2.75; 95% CI, 1.14 to 6.12) and poor survival (HR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.00 to 3.72).

CONCLUSION

Several biologically plausible associations between individual single nucleotide polymorphisms and clinical outcomes were found. Our data also strongly suggest that combined pathway-based analysis may provide valuable prognostic markers of clinical outcomes.

The number of lymph nodes with metastasis predicts survival in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who receive preoperative chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

The survival of patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) who receive preoperative chemoradiation is reported to be better among patients who achieve a pathologic complete response than among patients who have residual tumor, including lymph node (LN) metastasis. However, the prognostic significance of the number of LNs with residual metastasis remains unclear.

METHODS

The authors studied 187 consecutive patients who received chemoradiation followed by an esophagectomy. The number of positive LNs and the size of metastatic tumor in each positive LN were examined with regard to overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

A pathologic complete response was achieved by 29% of patients. No LN metastasis (posttherapy pathologic negative LN status [ypN0]) was present in 49% of patients who had residual carcinoma, and LN metastasis (ypN1) was present in 51% of patients. The 5-year OS and 2-year RFS rates achieved by patients who had 1 positive LN (34% and 45%, respectively) were similar to the rates achieved by patients in the ypN0 group (38% [P = 0.84] and 50% [P = 0.77], respectively) but were significantly better than the rates achieved by patients who had > or = 2 positive LNs (6% [P = 0.02] and 18% [P = 0.01], respectively). The size of metastatic tumor in LNs among patients who had 1 positive LN was a prognostic factor (> or = 4 mm vs. < 4 mm; P = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, OS was better in patients who had 1 LN metastasis among patients in the ypN1 group (P = 0.02) independent of their posttherapy pathologic tumor status.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggested that the number of LNs with metastasis is an independent prognostic factor in patients with residual adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or the EGJ after preoperative chemoradiation. The authors suggest modification of the tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) staging classification (ypTNM) to include the number of positive LNs in the ypN1 category.

Esophageal Carcinoma: Current Controversial Topics

Worldwide, esophageal carcinoma is a common gastrointestinal cancer with a high mortality. The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is increasing in the western world, but squamous cell carcinoma remains dominant in the underdeveloped parts of the world. Both types of esophageal carcinoma remain equally virulent. Currently, there are no optimal preventative screening programs available and most patients present with advanced or metastatic disease. Although many options are available for improving diagnostic accuracy, a single method has not displayed significant advantages over the others. In addition, selecting a superior treatment regimen has not surfaced. Preferred resection techniques exist, but one method has not illustrated improvements in survival over the others. A lack of improved survival rates with single modality therapies has led to a multi modality approach. However, developments in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have led to mixed conclusions. Collectively, past studies have not shown an optimal neoadjuvant or adjuvant regimen in terms of survival benefit. This review highlights existing staging modalities and treatment regimens for esophageal carcinoma, in an effort to illustrate the controversial nature surrounding its management.

Should preoperative, post-chemoradiotherapy endoscopy be routine for esophageal cancer patients?

Chemoradiation therapy is used widely for locoregional esophageal cancer. Patients with persistent disease may benefit from surgery. Preoperative esophagoscopy can identify persistent tumor but its accuracy is uncertain. The primary objective of this study is to assess the extent of agreement between esophagoscopy and surgical pathology in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent chemoradiation, preoperative endoscopy and surgery from January 1996 to December 2002 was performed. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to measure the degree of agreement between findings at endoscopic biopsy and surgical pathology. Thirty cases were identified. All patients received chemoradiation followed by surgical resection. There was insufficient agreement between tumor size (kappa 0.25, standard error 0.17, P = 0.07) and appearance (kappa 0.19, standard error 0.18, P = 0.14). Preoperative endoscopy revealed atypia/inflammation in 15 cases and dysplasia in eight. Of these 23 cases, 11 were adenocarcinomas at surgery. Only nine patients had concurrence between surgical pathology and endoscopy. The positive and negative predictive values of esophagoscopy for identifying residual tumor were 100% and 11%, respectively. Our data suggests that after chemoradiation, esophagoscopy is unreliable for excluding residual disease. The roles of other modalities need to be explored.

(Neo)adjuvant strategies of advanced gastric carcinoma: time for a change?

Despite surgical R0 resections, patients with gastric cancer stage UICC II-III have a high risk of recurrence and metachronic metastases. Preliminary evidence exists that adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy protocols may improve the prognosis of these patients undergoing surgery of gastric cancer with curative intention. As for palliative regimens, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin are integral components of such (neo)adjuvant strategies. Upcoming cytostatic agents, i.e. irinotecan, docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and oral fluoropyridines are currently under investigation in new multimodality treatment regimens and may further increase R0 resection rates and may prolong disease-free and overall survival in the treatment of advanced localized gastric cancer.

Patients vivants à 5 ans après œsophagectomie curative pour cancer

AIM OF THE STUDY

To analyse the clinical and pathological parameters of 5-year survival patients after curative oesophageal resection for cancer and to identify factors predictive of long-term survival.

METHODS

The data of 370 patients who underwent oesophagectomy with curative intent from January 1982 for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 320) or adenocarcinoma (n = 50) were reviewed. After excluding postoperative deaths (n = 20), these patients were surviving (S group, n = 113) or dead (NS group, n = 237) with a 60-month follow-up. Uni- and multivariate analysis allowed comparison between the two groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 4.0% and 37.6%, respectively. Parameters related to 5-year survival were: absence of preoperative malnutrition or dysphagia, transhiatal resection, no reoperation, limited tumour, histological response to neoadjuvant treatment, absence of lymph node capsular invasion, number of invaded lymph nodes < or = 4, invaded lymph node ratio < or = 0.1, absence of tumour recurrence or metachronous primary cancer. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of 5-year survival were: absence of preoperative dysphagia (P < 0.001), stage 0-I-IIA tumour (P<0.001) and absence of metachronous cancer (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical resection allows 5-year survival. Factors predictive of long-term survival assessed in preoperative evaluation, dysphagia and tumour stage, should be useful to select patients for neoadjuvant treatment.

Current status of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus

Prospective studies dealing with preoperative therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus alone are rare. The interpretation of the preferential phase II trials and a few phase III trials is complicated, as most studies include adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (i.e., Barrett's carcinoma), adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (including cardia carcinoma and subcardia carcinoma), or squamous cell carcinoma. Preoperative chemotherapy, generally well tolerated, cannot decrease the incidence of local failure beyond the level achieved with surgery alone, but it might delay systemic relapse. Preoperative radiotherapy can enhance local control, but it fails to improve overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was demonstrated in only one randomized trail to have a survival benefit, but survival in the surgery-alone group was unusually low. Generally, survival was ameliorated in patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment. However, preoperative chemoradiation was often accompanied by a remarkable increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Nonresponding patients have, in this respect, a worse prognosis than responders after resection. The prediction of responding patients to neoadjuvant therapy as well as the early identification of patients who will not respond is of utmost clinical importance. Today, there is no absolute evidence that neoadjuvant treatment for patients with potentially resectable Barrett's cancer prolongs survival. In patients with locally advanced, presumably not completely resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, preoperative treatment appears to increase the chance for a curative resection and enhance survival in responding patients. Neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, as a consequence, is currently not the standard treatment and should be performed only within controlled clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

There is no general agreement on the effect of neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer on patient survival.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of preoperative treatment on survival of patients with resectable esophageal cancer and the effect of preoperative treatment on patient mortality. A standard variance-based method was used to derive summary estimates of the absolute difference in both 2-year survival and treatment-related mortality.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized trials involving 2311 patients were analyzed. Preoperative chemotherapy improved 2-year survival compared with surgery alone: the absolute difference was 4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI],.3%-8.5%). Marginal evidence of heterogeneity was eliminated by restricting attention to the four most recent studies, which increased the estimate to 6.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-10.7%). For combined chemoradiotherapy, the increase was 6.4% (nonsignificant; 95% CI, -1.2%-14.0%). Treatment-related mortality increased by 1.7% with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (95% CI, -.9%-4.3%) and by 3.4% with chemoradiotherapy (95% CI, -.1%-7.3%), compared with surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

There seems to be a modest survival advantage for patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, as compared with surgery alone. There is an apparent increase in treatment-related mortality, mainly for patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a critical reappraisal

Despite important refinements of surgical technique and significant progress in perioperative care, esophageal cancer remains highly lethal. Therefore, hope for improvement in the prognosis of esophageal cancer lies largely in the use of additional therapy. Promising data from numerous Phase II trials and a single Phase III trial led to the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, subsequent randomized trials did not conclusively demonstrate a survival benefit with any of the current neoadjuvant protocols for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Benefit, if any, exists only for complete pathologic responders. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation should not be used in patients with resectable esophageal cancer outside of the clinical trials. Future investigation must focus on the development of new biologic or chemotherapeutic agents, and the identification of biologic markers that might predict response to chemoradiation.

Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary complications are common in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. There are no good predictive variables for these complications. In addition, the role that preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and radiation may play in postoperative complications remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent esophagectomy by a single surgeon at our institution over a 6-year period. Data were analyzed for a correlation between patient risk factors and pulmonary complications, including mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Complete data were available on 61 patients. Nearly all patients had some pulmonary abnormality (eg, pleural effusion), although most of these were clinically insignificant. Pneumonia was the most common clinically important complication, and 19.7% of patients required prolonged ventilatory support. Significant risk factors identified included impaired pulmonary function, especially for patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 65% of predicted, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired lung function is a significant risk factor for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Patients with FEV1 less than 65% of predicted appear to be at greatest risk. There also seems to be an associated risk of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

A pathological study of tumour regression in oesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

AIMS

To measure residual tumour in oesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy, to correlate specific pathological variables with survival, and to describe morphological changes in tumour and non-neoplastic tissue resulting from preoperative treatment.

METHODS

Resection specimens from 47 cases of oesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin and radiotherapy were reviewed. Residual tumour was assessed in terms of tumour regression grade (TRG), pTNM stage, lymphovascular space invasion, and resection margin involvement. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Cox's proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A complete pathological response (TRG1) was present in eight cases. The absence of residual tumour was confirmed by negative immunohistochemical staining for MNF116. Tumour corresponding to TRG2 was present in five cases, to TRG3 in nine, to TRG4 in 22, and to TRG5 in three. By multivariate analysis, pN0 status (n = 35) had a positive effect on survival (p = 0.04) and TRG had no significant effect on survival (p = 0.06). Patients with pN0 tumours had a median survival of 48 months versus eight months for those with pN1 tumours (log rank test, p < 0.0001). We found that giant fibroblasts were discernible from single large residual tumour cells on haematoxylin and eosin alone.

CONCLUSION

Response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma is variable. Although there are as yet no reliable predictors of response to treatment, patients who are identified at diagnosis as having negative loco-regional lymph nodes should benefit considerably from this treatment approach.

Ten years of preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation in three consecutive studies

PURPOSE

To compare acute toxicity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation in three schedules of concurrent chemoradiation in resectable transmural and/or node-positive extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 1999, 163 consecutive patients were treated according to the following combined modalities: FUMIR: between 1990 and 1995, 83 patients were treated with bolus i.v. mitomycin C (MMC), 10 mg/m(2) day 1, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1-4, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (37.8 Gy). PLAFUR-4: between 1995 and 1998, 40 patients were treated with cisplatin (c-DDP) 60 mg/m(2) given as slow infusion (1-4 h) on days 1 and 29, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1-4 and 29-32 with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). PLAFUR-5: between 1998 and 1999, 40 patients were treated with c-DDP 60 mg/m(2) given as slow infusion (during 1-4 h) on days 1 and 29, plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2), days 1-5 and 29-33 with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy).

RESULTS

Grade > or = 3 acute toxicity occurred in 14%, 5%, and 17% of patients treated in the FUMIR, PLAFUR-4, and PLAFUR-5 studies, respectively (p = 0.201). In the FUMIR, PLAFUR-4, and PLAFUR-5 studies, clinical response rate was 77%, 70%, and 83%, respectively. Tumor downstaging occurred in 57%, 68%, and 58% of patients, respectively. Pathologic complete response was recorded in 9% (FUMIR), 23% (PLAFUR-4), and 20% (PLAFUR-5) of patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was feasible in 44% (FUMIR), 40% (PLAFUR-4), and 61% (PLAFUR-5) of patients having a distance between the anal-rectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor of 0-30 mm, and in 95%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in those having a distance of 31-50 mm. Comparing FUMIR vs. PLAFUR, the clinical response rate was similar in the two series: a partial response was observed in 62/81 (77%) patients with FUMIR treatment, and in 61/80 (76%) patients with PLAFUR treatment. Tumor downstaging was observed in 46/81 (57%) patients and in 50/80 (68%) patients, respectively. The pathologic complete response rate was statistically higher in the PLAFUR series: 7/81 (9%) patients with FUMIR treatment and 17/80 (21%) patients with PLAFUR treatment (p = 0.04). Major downstaging (pT0+ pTmic+ pT1) in the FUMIR group was reported in 12/81 (15%) patients versus 31/80 (39%) patients in the PLAFUR group (p = 0.0006). The anal sphincter was preserved in 63/81 (78%) patients with FUMIR treatment and in 69/80 (86%) patients with PLAFUR treatment. The perioperative morbidity was statistically lower with PLAFUR: a perioperative morbidity was experienced by 20/81 (25%) patients with FUMIR treatment and by 9/80 (11%) patients with PLAFUR treatment (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, higher radiation dose (50.4 Gy vs. 37.8 Gy), a second course of concurrent 5-FU, and the use of c-DDP instead of MMC improved the pathologic response rate without increasing acute toxicity and perioperative morbidity. The use of 5-FU 5-day infusion (PLAFUR-5) resulted in higher toxicity with a similar response rate compared to 4-day infusion (PLAFUR-4).

Prevalence and prognostic significance of neuroendocrine cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Neuroendocrine differentiation is common in adenocarcinomas of the stomach and colon and may be associated with a slightly better prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma. We studied neuroendocrine differentiation in esophageal adenocarcinomas and associated Barrett's esophagus (BE) to determine association with patient outcome. Fifty-eight cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma (15 biopsies, 43 resections) from 52 patients were stained with a monoclonal antibody to chromogranin (CG). Medical records were reviewed for tumor stage, response to therapy, and patient survival. Thirty-two patients received radiation and chemotherapy, and four received radiation. Twelve of 58 (20.7%) esophageal adenocarcinomas contained scattered CG-positive cells. Tumors with CG-positive cells were moderately to poorly differentiated, and many consisted of large cribriform glands, similar to intestinal-type adenocarcinomas. One case of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus was weakly CG positive; another was negative. Neuroendocrine differentiation was retained in lymph node metastases in two cases but lost in three other cases. In 10 CG-negative primary tumors, lymph node metastases were also negative. For five of six patients with paired biopsy/resection specimens, no CG-positive cells were seen in either specimen; one patient had CG-positive cells only in the resection. There was no difference in tumor stage at surgery or survival time between CG-positive and CG-negative tumors. BE was present in 34 cases and contained CG-positive cells in 21 of 34 (61.8%). Low-grade dysplasia contained CG-positive cells in 11 of 14 cases (78.6%) and high-grade dysplasia in 3 of 6 cases. Fourteen of 21 (66.7%) adenocarcinomas associated with CG-positive BE were negative for CG. In summary, neuroendocrine differentiation is common in BE and is retained in low- and high-grade dysplasia but is usually lost in esophageal adenocarcinoma. The presence of scattered neuroendocrine cells does not affect patient outcome.

Preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Oeosphageal Cancer Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

The existing randomized evidence has failed to conclusively demonstrate the benefit or otherwise of preoperative radiotherapy in treating patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is benefit from adding radiotherapy prior to surgery and whether or not any pre-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from preoperative radiotherapy

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline and CancerLit searches were supplemented by information from trial registers and by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by discussion with relevant trialists, organisations and industry.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis provided they randomized patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (of any histological type) to receive radiotherapy or no radiotherapy prior to surgery. Trials must have used a randomization method which precluded prior knowledge of treatment assignment and completed accrual by December 1993, to ensure sufficient follow-up by the time of the first analysis (September 1995).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A quantitative meta-analysis using updated data from individual patients from all properly randomized trials (published or unpublished) comprising 1147 patients (971 deaths) from five randomized trials. This approach was used to assess whether preoperative radiotherapy improves overall survival and whether it is differentially effective in patients defined by age, sex and tumour location.

MAIN RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 9 years, in a group patients with mostly squamous carcinomas, the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.01) suggests an overall reduction in the risk of death of 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. This result is not conventionally statistically significant (p=0.062). No clear differences in the size of the effect by sex, age or tumor location were apparent.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Based on existing trials, there was no clear evidence that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results indicate that if such preoperative radiotherapy regimens do improve survival, then the effect is likely to be modest with an absolute improvement in survival of around 3 to 4%. Trials or a meta-analysis of around 2000 patients (90% power, 5% significance level) would be needed to reliably detect such an improvement (from 15 to 20%).

Preoperative chemoradiation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer: acute toxicity, tumor response, sphincter preservation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of preoperative external radiation therapy intensified by systemic chemotherapy including bolus cisplatin (c-DDP) and 4-day infusional 5-fluorouracil (PLAFUR-4) on tumor response and sphincter preservation in patients with extraperitoneal T3 rectal cancer with acceptable toxicity, and to compare the results to our previous experience with bolus mitomycin c (MMC) and 4-day infusion 5-FU (FUMIR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1995 and March 1998, 40 consecutive patients with resectable extraperitoneal adenocarcinoma of the rectum were treated with preoperative chemoradiation: slow infusion i.v. c-DDP, 60 mg/m2, day 1 and 29 plus 24-h continuous infusion i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m2, days 1-4 and 29-32, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy whole pelvis followed by 5.4 Gy boost). All but 3 patients had T3 disease. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiation.

RESULTS

No patient had Grade 4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 hematological toxicity was observed only in 2 (5%) patients. No patient had major gastrointestinal, skin, or urological acute toxicity. All patients had radical surgery. There was no perioperative mortality; perioperative morbidity rate was 12%. Overall, 23% (9 of 40) of patients had a complete pathological response and 10% (4 of 40) of patients had rare isolated residual cancer cells (Tmic). Comparing the stage at the diagnostic workup with the pathological stage, tumor downstaging was observed in 27 (68%) patients; nodal status downstaging was detected in 24 (60%) patients. Thirty-four (85%) patients had a sphincter-saving surgical procedure. In 4 of 10 (40%) patients who were definitive candidates for an abdominoperineal resection (APR), the sphincter was preserved, as it was in 13 of 13 (100%) probable candidates. Lengthening of the distance between the anorectal ring and the lower pole of the tumor > or =20 mm was observed in 9 (23%) patients. None of the patients had soilage after the sphincter-saving procedure. In our previous experience with FUMIR the complete pathological response was 9%, the sphincter-saving surgical procedure was performed in 66% cases, and the Grade 3+ toxicity was observed in 13% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of c-DDP to 5-FU (PLAFUR-4) in a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy schedule improved the pathological response rate in comparison with our previous experience. Toxicity was low indeed, thus we commenced another study adding one more day of 5-FU infusion (PLAFUR-5) to further improve our results.

Oesophageal cancer treatment: studies, strategies and facts

Esophageal cancer is among the ten most frequent cancers in the world. Once diagnosis is established prognosis is poor with five-year survival rates below 10%. Over the last few years, the evidence--base for treatment of oesophageal cancer has changed with the publication of several important articles in this field. This article reviews these and other relevant publications with focus on current evidence which holds potential for an improvement in survival in oesophageal cancer patients. Prevention and early detection represent the mainstay in the ongoing struggle to improve prognosis, which is most stringently linked to tumor stage. Other efforts have been dedicated to optimise surgical treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and to discover the most efficient combinations of these treatment modalities. Strong but not unanimous evidence in favour of a multimodality approach with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has accumulated in recent years, and confirmatory trials are presently ongoing. A pathological complete response to chemoradiotherapy has been identified to significantly enhance survival. Among the strategies to achieve higher response rates, variations in the administration of the most commonly used drugs rather than higher drug and radiation dosages seem promising. Occult lymphatic spread has been recognized as a major source of recurrence and has been successfully targeted by three field surgical dissection and extended field radiotherapy. In search of the optimal treatment for patients with oesophageal cancer, a variety of different tracks are being pursued. This review outlines and analyses current treatment approaches and investigates how recent advances may impact on patient management.

Apoptosis in esophageal cancer following induction chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The poor survival of patients with esophageal cancer following esophagectomy has led to intense investigation into combined modality therapy. Based on results from clinical trials examining chemoradiotherapy alone without surgery, resection has come under increased scrutiny and its necessity as a component of a multimodal approach has been questioned. In this study, we examined whether residual tumor cells in esophagectomy specimens following induction chemoradiotherapy are viable and, therefore, provide putative evidence for the appropriateness of esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1991 and January 1995, 46 patients were entered into an induction chemoradiotherapy trial consisting of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, alpha-interferon, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy followed by esophagectomy. Response was determined histologically and apoptosis assessed with a terminal deoxytransferase assay system. p53 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and mutational analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent esophagectomy, 33 of whom had either a complete (n = 10) or partial (n = 23) response. None of the 28 patients with residual tumor in the resected specimen had 100% apoptotic cells and the vast majority of specimens had less than a 10% apoptotic rate. The percentage of apoptotic cells did correlate with tumor differentiation but not with histologic type nor presence of p53 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that resection following upfront chemoradiotherapy is a necessary component of a multimodality approach to esophageal cancer and will ultimately provide superior local-regional control to a nonsurgical approach.

Endoscopic ultrasound in restaging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is established as the most accurate method currently available for determining the depth of primary cancer invasion (T stage). Standard EUS criteria may not be accurate in assessing depth of cancer invasion and nodal status after patients have received chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study to determine whether EUS estimation of tumor size could be used to assess response to preoperative chemoradiation. Using EUS, TNM stage was assessed in 31 patients (22 men, 9 women; mean age 62 years) with cancer of esophagus or cardia (19 adenocarcinoma, 12 squamous cell cancer) before initiation of combined radiation and 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin (and/or carboplatinum) chemotherapy. The cross-sectional area of the tumor in the transverse plane at the location where the tumor had maximal thickness was calculated to estimate tumor size. EUS staging and measurement of maximal cross-sectional area were repeated at completion of chemoradiation just before surgery. Response to preoperative chemoradiation was defined as 50% reduction in maximal cross-sectional area. Surgical staging was compared between responders and nonresponders.

RESULTS

Eight patients who did not undergo surgery were excluded from analysis. EUST stage in the remaining 23 patients before therapy was as follows: 3 T2, 16 T3, and 4 T4. After chemoradiation, EUS T staging was changed in 6 patients (3 T4 downstaged to T3, 2 T3 downstaged to T2, and 1 T3 downstaged to T1). At surgical pathological examination, 3 patients had no residual tumor in the esophagus (T0), 5 had T1, 3 had T2, 10 had T3, and 2 had T4 tumors. EUS T staging accuracy after adjuvant therapy was only 43%. Maximal cross-sectional area decreased from a mean of 5.5 +/- 2.4 to 1.6 +/- 0.9 cm2 in responders, whereas maximal cross-sectional area went from 7.0 +/- 3.0 to 5.4 +/- 2.2 cm2 in nonresponders (p = 0.009). Ten of thirteen patients with at least a 50% reduction in maximal cross-sectional area (responders) had T0, T1, or T2 tumors at surgery, whereas 9 of 10 nonresponders had T3 or T4 tumors at surgery (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Standard EUS staging criteria are not accurate after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, (2) reduction in maximal cross-sectional area of tumor appears to be a more useful measure for assessing response of esophageal cancer to preoperative chemoradiation, and (3) responders have an increased likelihood of downstaging at surgery than nonresponders.

Clinicopathologic features of patients with oesophageal cancer obtaining a histological complete response for preoperative hyperthermo-chemo-radiotherapy

From 1979 to 1993, 151 patients with resectable oesophageal cancer underwent preoperative hyperthermo-chemo-radiotherapy (HCR) followed by a subtotal esophagectomy. All resected specimens were histopathologically evaluated, and then were classified into two groups according to the efficacy of the preoperative HCR. Group A included 33 patients whose resected oesophagus was free of any cancer cells (grade 3). Group B included 118 patients, in which viable cancer cells remained in the resected specimens to various degrees (grade 1,2). The incidence of patients with well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, node negative cases, or TNM stage I/II was significantly higher in group A than in group B (27.3% versus 9.3%, 72.7% versus 50.8%, 72.7% versus 50.8%, respectively). The recurrence rate was 33.3% (11/33) in group A, while it was 65.3% (77/118) in group B (p < 0.005). There was no case with any local recurrence in the former, while it was 8.5% (10/118) in the latter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 87.2%, 65.9% and 46.1% in group A, while they were 54.8%, 26.7% and 18.8% in group B (p < 0.005), respectively. Preoperative HCR may be expected of decreasing in the recurrence rate, including regional relapse when a grade 3 is obtained. Complete local control would further positively influence the prognosis.

Prognosis of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, as well as its association with Barrett's esophagus, has been reported previously. We report our experience in treating patients with adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 70 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated between November 1988 and April 1996 with preoperative chemoradiation and resection. Demographics, pathologic features, and survival were compared with patients who developed adenocarcinoma of the esophagus without Barrett's. Statistical analyses was performed using Student's t test, Fisher's exact test, and Kaplan-Meier where appropriate.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (46%) patients had adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. During the last 4 years, 72% (23 of 32) of patients with adenocarcinoma had coexistent Barrett's. No differences in patients with or without Barrett's with regard to age, sex, race, tumor location, preoperative chemotherapy, type of operation, or operative stage were observed. Tumors in patients with Barrett's were larger (p = 0.017), had better differentiation (p = 0.002), and were less likely to have a complete response to preoperative chemoradiation (p = 0.05). Actuarial survival, however, was better in the group with associated Barrett's esophagus (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus arising in Barrett's esophagus appears to be increasing. It may be distinct clinically and biologically from adenocarcinoma of the esophagus that does not develop in association with Barrett's epithelium. Long-term survival was better in our patients with adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett's esophagus.

Clinical evaluation of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CDDP, 5-FU, and VP-16 for advanced esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy following surgery in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We followed the cases of 57 such patients treated at our hospital, involving 19 who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CR group), 19 who received radiotherapy alone (R group), and 19 who did received neither (N group). In the CR group, chemotherapy, consisting of cis-diaminodichloroplatinum (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and etoposide (VP-16), was combined with radiotherapy was administered from 4 weeks after surgery. Concurrent radiotherapy was started at 3 weeks after esophagectomy. CDDP at 50 mg/m2 was administered on days 1 and 7.5-FU at 500 mg/m2 and VP-16 at 60 mg/m2 were administered on days 3, 4, and 5. Thirteen patients (68.4%) were treated with more than 2 cycles of chemotherapy combined with radiation.

RESULTS

Side-effects of severe anorexia (grade 3) and leukocytopenia (< 1900/microliter) were observed in 47% and 39% of the patients, respectively. However no treatment-related death was observed. The 5-year-survival rate was 25.2%, 18.9%, and 15.8%, in the CR group, R group, and N group, respectively. The recurrence rate was 66.7% in the CR group, which was higher than in the matched control groups (46.2% in the N group and 54.5% in the R group), but with no a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not contribute to improvement in prognosis for these patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a review and update

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus is an often-lethal disease that most commonly presents in an advanced stage with dysphagia in elderly patients. Known risk factors include alcohol and tobacco abuse, lye stricture, and achalasia. Screening protocols for high-risk patients are practiced in Japan but not in the United States. The diagnosis usually is made based on the results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and contrast upper gastrointestinal radiographs. Staging is determined using computed tomography scanning and esophageal ultrasound, the latter rapidly being accepted as a superior method. Treatment is based on the stage of disease at presentation. Lesions without metastatic spread or mediastinal invasion generally should be treated with esophagectomy. Dysphagia associated with advanced lesions is difficult to treat, but may be palliated by surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, laser ablation, peroral dilation, or esophageal stenting. Despite numerous medical advances, little headway has been made in managing and treating SCC, and a multidisciplinary approach is recommended.

Biology of esophageal cancer and the role of combined modality therapy

1. The biology of esophageal cancer involves multifactorial environmental and genetic events. 2. The understanding of the clinical significance of molecular markers is rapidly evolving. 3. Combined-modality approaches should still include surgery in good performance status (ECOG scale < or = 2) patients. 4. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is probably better than surgical resection alone for patients with potentially curable disease, but only validation of this approach by CALGB-9781 can justify this as a new "proven" standard-of-care in the United States. 5. A pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy is the strongest predictor of long-term survival. 6. 5-FU, by either short course or protracted continuous infusion, comprises the backbone of combination chemotherapy in combined-modality design. 7. Radiation therapy should be given at standard 1.8 to 2 Gy/fraction without a scheduled break. 8. Only by enrolling sufficient numbers of patients in prospective clinical trials will clinicians be able to further define the optimal sequencing and actual necessity of each individual component of combined-modality therapy.

Review: chemotherapy, irradiation and their roles in the management of oesophageal cancer

The role of multimodality therapy in the treatment of oesophageal cancer has been extensively investigated in many longitudinal studies and randomized trials. Despite some promising results, no clear beneficial evidence has consistently been produced. At present it cannot be routinely recommended outside the context of controlled clinical trials.

Barrett's cancer: indications, extent, and results of surgical resection

In the Western world, the prevalence of Barrett's carcinoma, i.e., adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus arising from specialized columnar epithelial metaplasia, has risen dramatically in the past two decades. High-grade dysplasia in the columnar epithelium has been identified as the precursor of malignant carcinoma. Whether an esophagectomy should be performed in patients with high-grade dysplasia remains controversial. Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy in patients with invasive adenocarcinoma who are fit for surgery. Complete removal of the primary tumor and its lymphatic drainage has to be the primary goal of any surgical approach to adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. In patients with tumors located in the distal esophagus, this can be achieved by a radical transhiatal esophagectomy and proximal gastric resection with en bloc removal of the lymphatic drainage in the lower posterior mediastinum and along the celiac axis. Early adenocarcinoma can be cured by this approach. The value of multimodality therapy in patients with advanced tumors needs to be confirmed in well-designed randomized prospective trials.

A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled studies suggest that a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing surgery alone with combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery.

METHODS

Patients assigned to multimodal therapy received two courses of chemotherapy in weeks 1 and 6 (fluorouracil, 15 mg per kilogram of body weight daily for five days, and cisplatin, 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 7) and a course of radiotherapy (40 Gy, administered in 15 fractions over a three-week period, beginning concurrently with the first course of chemotherapy), followed by surgery. The patients assigned to surgery had no preoperative therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients assigned to multimodal therapy and the 55 assigned to surgery, 10 and 1, respectively, were withdrawn for protocol violations. At the time of surgery, 23 of 55 patients (42 percent) treated with preoperative multimodal therapy who could be evaluated had positive nodes or metastases, as compared with 45 of the 55 patients (82 percent) who underwent surgery alone (P<0.001). Thirteen of the 52 patients (25 percent) who underwent surgery after multimodal therapy had complete responses as determined pathologically. The median survival of patients assigned to multimodal therapy was 16 months, as compared with 11 months for those assigned to surgery alone (P=0.01). At one, two, and three years, 52, 37, and 32 percent, respectively, of patients assigned to multimodal therapy were alive, as compared with 44, 26, and 6 percent of those assigned to surgery, with the survival advantage favoring multimodal therapy reaching significance at three years (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment is superior to surgery alone for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: response, toxicity, quality of life, and survival

BACKGROUND

The results of chemotherapy for patients with esophagogastric carcinoma have generally been modest but regimens developed more recently have produced higher response rates, and rekindled interest in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One such regimen is epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF). This study evaluates its efficacy, toxicity, impact on quality of life (QL), and impact on survival in a large consecutive series of patients with metastatic and locally advanced disease (LAD).

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed esophagogastric carcinoma were treated with ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 mg/m2/d). Responses were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) scan and endoscopy. QL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 235 patients were treated, 173 with metastatic disease and 62 with LAD. The mean number of cycles delivered was 6 (range: 1-11) and patients were followed-up for a median of 8 months. Response was observed in 135 of 220 (61%) evaluable patients, with a complete response (C(R)), 11% of the patients and a partial response in 50% of the patients. Patients with moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas and LAD responded most favorably. Symptomatic improvement was achieved in the majority of cases (63-78% depending on the symptom). Toxicity was generally only mild to moderate, with severe non hematologic toxicity in less than 12% of the patients and only 6 (2.5%) treatment related deaths. QL assessment showed no significant negative impact on emotional functioning and good symptomatic control. Surgery following response to ECF was performed in 29 of the LAD patients, and in 19 cases (66%) a potentially curative resection was possible, with histologic CR in 32% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ECF is a highly active regimen with acceptable toxicity in patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. In a proportion of patients with LAD, chemotherapy enabled potentially curative surgery to be performed. The results justify further investigation of this regimen in a neoadjuvant setting.

A review of carcinoma of the stomach at a tertiary care referral hospital

BACKGROUND

Carcinoma of the stomach continues to cause a significant mortality in the United States. We reviewed the characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival of a group of patients with this cancer at a tertiary care referral hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective computer based review of all patients with a diagnosis of carcinoma of the stomach in the Ohio State University (OSU) tumor registry was made. One hundred ninety-two analytical cases were found and the data was entered into a computerized database and analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall median survival in this series of patients is 10 months with a median survival of 16 months (n.s.) in patients who underwent curative surgery (50% of the patients). There was an increased number of cardia lesion (37%) predominately in male patients (P < 0.05). A significantly greater number of female patients presented with linitis plastica and male patients with adenocarcinoma, although there was no difference in the operability, types of operations, and survival between the genders. Patients with signet ring cell cancer were significantly younger than the other two histological types reviewed but this did not alter outcome.

CONCLUSION

Carcinoma of the stomach, despite newer image modalities, continues to present at advanced stages at time of diagnosis with an overall dismal prognosis. The increased incidence of cardia lesions noted require innovative therapies if any progress is to be made.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: response, toxicity, quality of life, and survival

BACKGROUND

The results of chemotherapy for patients with esophagogastric carcinoma have generally been modest but regimens developed more recently have produced higher response rates, and rekindled interest in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One such regimen is epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF). This study evaluates its efficacy, toxicity, impact on quality of life (QL), and impact on survival in a large consecutive series of patients with metastatic and locally advanced disease (LAD).

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed esophagogastric carcinoma were treated with ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 mg/m2/d). Responses were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) scan and endoscopy. QL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 235 patients were treated, 173 with metastatic disease and 62 with LAD. The mean number of cycles delivered was 6 (range: 1-11) and patients were followed-up for a median of 8 months. Response was observed in 135 of 220 (61%) evaluable patients, with a complete response (C(R)), 11% of the patients and a partial response in 50% of the patients. Patients with moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas and LAD responded most favorably. Symptomatic improvement was achieved in the majority of cases (63-78% depending on the symptom). Toxicity was generally only mild to moderate, with severe non hematologic toxicity in less than 12% of the patients and only 6 (2.5%) treatment related deaths. QL assessment showed no significant negative impact on emotional functioning and good symptomatic control. Surgery following response to ECF was performed in 29 of the LAD patients, and in 19 cases (66%) a potentially curative resection was possible, with histologic CR in 32% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ECF is a highly active regimen with acceptable toxicity in patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. In a proportion of patients with LAD, chemotherapy enabled potentially curative surgery to be performed. The results justify further investigation of this regimen in a neoadjuvant setting.

Radiation therapy alone or combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer

Radiation therapy has been used in the adjuvant setting or as a primary treatment modality for esophageal cancer. Although there are design flaws in all of the trials of adjuvant radiation therapy for esophageal cancer, there is no clear survival advantage when radiation therapy is delivered in the adjuvant setting (preoperatively or postoperatively). Phase II results of preoperative, combined modality therapy are encouraging; however, the approach remains investigational. When radiation therapy is used as a primary modality, the most favorable results are seen when it is combined with adequate doses of systemic chemotherapy. Phase III intergroup trials are in progress which are examining the effectiveness of higher doses of radiation therapy when combined with chemotherapy.

Radical surgery for gastric cancer in Singapore

This study was conducted to define the pattern and results of gastric cancer surgery in Singapore by reviewing the epidemiological data from the Singapore Cancer Registry together with a review of a personal series of 182 patients operated on over a 14 1/2-year period. As in Japan and the West, the incidence of gastric cancer is decreasing in Singapore; it was 2.3% per year for men and 1.5% for women in the period 1968-1982. Nevertheless, the disease is still common and the respective age-standardized rates among the ethnic Chinese in Singapore of 37.3 and 15.4 per 100,000 per year remain higher than in the West but are only about half the rate observed in Japan. These rates in Singapore Chinese are also higher than those seen in the Chinese-Americans in the United States, but are lower than those of the Chinese of Shanghai, which suggests that lifestyle and diet influence the incidence of gastric cancer. In the series of 182 patients, gastric adenocarcinoma occurred in the antrum or body or the whole stomach in 78.5% and in the cardia in 21.5%. Presentation was late: stage I, 10%; stage II, 7.7%; stage III, 28%; and stage IV, 54.3%. Surgical resection was performed whenever technically possible (146 patients, 80%). In 86 patients, all macroscopic tumors were excised by a radical resection approximating the R2 type of resection, with only one operative mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The significance of c-erb B-2 and p53 immunoreactivity in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Studies in breast cancer suggest that p53 and c-erb B2 protein overexpression are predictive of outcome. The authors determined whether these molecular markers correlated with treatment response and survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

METHOD

Immunostaining for p53 and c-erb B2 was performed on paraffin-embedded specimens from 42 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil [5-FU] x 3 cycles) and irradiation (4500 rads) followed by resection.

RESULTS

In this cohort of patients, 79% (33/42) were positive for p53, and 43% (18/42) were positive for c-erb B2. p53 positivity correlated with residual disease in the resection specimen but not with disease-free survival. Although c-erb B2 negatively correlated with residual disease after resection and a 5-year survival of 10%, c-erb B2 positivity was associated with a 5-year actuarial survival of 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although p53 protein overexpression is commonly observed in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, its prognostic value appears limited. In contrast, c-erb B2 protein expression predicts a favorable response to therapy and improved survival.