Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. The University of California at San Francisco experience

Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Quality Assessment-Based Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are uncertain largely because existing publications lack clear comparisons between ART and non-ART arms.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched until December 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analysis was performed for studies with reliable comparability (i.e., no favorable prognosticators in the ART arm that could skew the data).

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies involving 1,731 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed. The overall median of all median prescribed doses was 50.4 Gy; brachytherapy or an intraoperative boost of 10-21 Gy was applied in 5 studies. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the non-ART and ART arms were 69.2% versus 81.0%, p = 0.035; 34.3% versus 44.7%, p = 0.025; 25.6% versus 31.7%, p = 0.115, respectively. The corresponding pooled locoregional recurrence rates were 52.1% versus 34.9% (p = 0.014). The pooled rate of grade ≥3 gastrointestinal complications was 9.8%. Sensitivity analysis performed on 14 eligible studies showed that the ART arms had a lower pooled R0 rate (36.8% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of positive lymph nodes (47.4% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.08). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the non-ART versus ART arms of the selected studies were 78.2% versus 84.9%, p = 0.143; 38.5% versus 49.2%, p = 0.026; and 27.8% versus 34.5%, p = 0.11, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ART was shown to improve OS in all studies and in those selected for their reliable comparability.

The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.

The Significance of Adjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) is a rare malignant tumor, and current treatment methods are also relatively limited. Radical surgery is the only potentially curative method for the long survival time. However, despite undergoing radical resection, prognosis remained poor due to the high recurrence rate and distant metastasis. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be offered to patients who have undergone surgery. Unfortunately, the low incidence of this disease has resulted in a lack of high-level evidence to confirm the importance of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. At present, it is still controversial whether adjuvant therapy can prolong the survival of patients after operation, especially patients with negative margins or lymph nodes. Furthermore, standard regimens of adjuvant have not been identified. This review summarizes the currently available evidence of the effect of adjuvant therapy in the management of EHCC. Ultimately, we concluded that adjuvant therapy may improve survival in high-risk (positive margin or lymph node or advanced stage) patients and adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy may be the optimum selection for them. This needs to be verified by randomized prospective clinical trials.

Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cases: An Expert Panel Case-Based Discussion

Cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder malignancies are aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies with management dependent on resectability, comorbidities, and location. A multidisciplinary discussion with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons is necessary to determine the optimal treatment approach for each patient. Surgical resection offers the best chance for a long-term cure. Recent studies, such as the phase II SWOG S0809 and the phase III BILCAP study have highlighted the importance of adjuvant treatment with radiation therapy and chemotherapy, respectively, in resected disease. In patients with unresectable disease chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy to a high dose can improve overall survival and locoregional control. In this expert panel we have brought together radiation oncologists and a medical oncologist to provide case-based feedback on their institutional practices.

Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is frequently shown to be dosimetrically superior to photon radiotherapy (RT), though supporting data for clinical benefit are severely limited. Because of the potential for toxicity reduction in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, we systematically reviewed the literature on clinical outcomes (survival/toxicity) of PBT.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group, and American Society of Clinical Oncology was conducted for publications from 2000-2015. Thirty-eight original investigations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Although results of PBT are not directly comparable to historical data, outcomes roughly mirror previous data, generally with reduced toxicities for PBT in some neoplasms. For esophageal cancer, PBT is associated with reduced toxicities, postoperative complications, and hospital stay as compared to photon radiation, while achieving comparable local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). In pancreatic cancer, numerical survival for resected/unresected cases is also similar to existing photon data, whereas grade ≥3 nausea/emesis and post-operative complications are numerically lower than those reported with photon RT. The strongest data in support of PBT for HCC comes from phase II trials demonstrating very low toxicities, and a phase III trial of PBT versus transarterial chemoembolization demonstrating trends towards improved LC and progression-free survival (PFS) with PBT, along with fewer post-treatment hospitalizations. Survival and toxicity data for cholangiocarcinoma, liver metastases, and retroperitoneal sarcoma are also roughly equivalent to historical photon controls. There are two small reports for gastric cancer and three for anorectal cancer; these are not addressed further.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited quality (and quantity) of data hamper direct comparisons and conclusions. However, the available data, despite the inherent caveats and limitations, suggest that PBT offers the potential to achieve significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities without compromising survival or LC for multiple GI malignancies. Several randomized comparative trials are underway that will provide more definitive answers.

Biliary Tract Cancer: Epidemiology, Radiotherapy, and Molecular Profiling

Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, arises from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts in the periphery of the liver (intrahepatic) and the main ducts of the hilum (extrahepatic), extending into the gallbladder. The incidence and epidemiology of biliary tract cancer are fluid and complex. It is shown that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is on the rise in the Western world, and gallbladder cancer is on the decline. Radiation therapy has emerged as an important component of adjuvant therapy for resected disease and definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. The emerging sophisticated techniques of imaging tumors and conformal dose delivery are expanding the indications for radiotherapy in the management of bile duct tumors. As we understand more about the molecular pathways driving biliary tract cancers, targeted therapies are at the forefront of new therapeutic combinations. Understanding the gene expression profile and mutational burden in biliary tract cancer allows us to better discern the pathogenesis and identify promising new developmental therapeutic targets.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze adjuvant therapy among patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC) at a national level.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with resected EHC (pathologic stages 1-3) between 1998 and 2006 (n = 8741). Three groups were compared: surgery only (S, n = 5766), surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC, n = 450), and surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (ACR, n = 1918). The study investigated how patient demographics, provider characteristics, and tumor-specific variables were associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy and overall survival.

RESULTS

Patients who received adjuvant treatment were more likely to be younger (median age S, 70 years; AC, 65 years; ACR, 63 years), in the highest income quartile (>$46,000: S, 38.3 %; AC, 43.4 %; ACR, 44.7 %), and treated at a community cancer center (S, 43.0 %; AC, 50.7 %; ACR, 52.9 %) (all p < 0.001). These patients also were more likely to have positive lymph nodes (S, 34.7 %; AC, 69.6 %; ACR, 63.3 %), positive surgical margins (S, 5.9 %; AC, 7.1 %; ACR, 10.7 %), and stage 3 disease (S, 21.4 %; AC, 37.8 %; ACR, 37.9 %) (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort showed improved survival with ACR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.91). The survival benefit was independent of margin status (R0: HR 0.88; 95 % CI 0.79-0.97; R1: HR 0.49; 95 % CI 0.38-0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

This national analysis suggests that ACR are associated with improved survival for high-risk EHC patients, such as those with positive lymph nodes. Until randomized clinical trials are conducted, these may be the best available data to guide adjuvant therapy for resected EHC.

SWOG S0809: A Phase II Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine and Gemcitabine Followed by Radiotherapy and Concurrent Capecitabine in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The role of postoperative therapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) or gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA) is unknown. S0809 was designed to estimate 2-year survival (overall and after R0 or R1 resection), pattern of relapse, and toxicity in patients treated with this adjuvant regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included diagnosis of EHCC or GBCA after radical resection, stage pT2-4 or N+ or positive resection margins, M0, and performance status 0 to 1. Patients received four cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) and capecitabine (1,500 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 14) every 21 days followed by concurrent capecitabine (1,330 mg/m(2) per day) and radiotherapy (45 Gy to regional lymphatics; 54 to 59.4 Gy to tumor bed). With 80 evaluable patients, results would be promising if 2-year survival 95% CI were > 45% and R0 and R1 survival estimates were ≥ 65% and 45%, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 79 eligible patients (R0, n = 54; R1, n = 25; EHCC, 68%; GBCA, 32%) were treated (86% completed). For all patients, 2-year survival was 65% (95% CI, 53% to 74%); it was 67% and 60% in R0 and R1 patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 35 months (R0, 34 months; R1, 35 months). Local, distant, and combined relapse occurred in 14, 24, and nine patients. Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were observed in 52% and 11% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were neutropenia (44%), hand-foot syndrome (11%), diarrhea (8%), lymphopenia (8%), and leukopenia (6%). There was one death resulting from GI hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

This combination was well tolerated, has promising efficacy, and provides clinicians with a well-supported regimen. Our trial establishes the feasibility of conducting national adjuvant trials in EHCC and GBCA and provides baseline data for planning future phase III trials.

Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has largely evolved, and increased resectability rates are reported. Large series of patients with resections for HC were published in the last years, and potential predictors for survival were explored. However, the usefulness of these predictors in clinical decision making is controversial.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present review is to explore the main prognostic factors after curative-intent surgery for HC, as emerged from the current literature. Furthermore, the impact of these predictors on clinical decision making is assessed.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach has improved the survival rates in patients with HC and implies bile duct resection associated with liver resection and loco-regional lymph node dissection. The AJCC staging system remains the main tool to assess the prognosis after resection of HC. Margin-negative resections and absence of lymph node metastases are the main prognostic factor after curative-intent surgery for HC. Response to chemotherapy is also a prognostic factor. Markers of systemic inflammatory response might predict prognosis of patients with HC, but their usefulness in clinical decision making remains unclear.

Clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton beam therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma

Background

We examined the efficacy and toxicity of proton beam therapy (PBT) for treating advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

The clinical data and outcomes of 28 cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with PBT between January 2009 and August 2011 were retrospectively examined. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates, and the log-rank test to analyze the effects of different clinical and treatment variables on survival. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results

The median age of the 17 male and 11 female patients was 71 years (range, 41 to 84 years; intrahepatic/peripheral cholangiocarcinoma, n = 6; hilar cholangiocarcinoma/Klatskin tumor, n = 6; distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, n = 3; gallbladder cancer, n = 3; local or lymph node recurrence, n = 10; size, 20–175 mm; median 52 mm). The median radiation dose was 68.2 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) (range, 50.6 to 80 Gy (RBE)), with delivery of fractions of 2.0 to 3.2 Gy (RBE) daily. The median follow-up duration was 12 months (range, 3 to 29 months). Fifteen patients underwent chemotherapy and 8 patients, palliative biliary stent placement prior to PBT. OS, PFS, and LC rates at 1 year were 49.0%, 29.5%, and 67.7%, respectively. LC was achieved in 6 patients, and was better in patients administered a biologically equivalent dose of 10 (BED10) > 70 Gy compared to those administered < 70 Gy (83.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively, at 1 year). The variables of tumor size and performance status were associated with survival. Late gastrointestinal toxicities grade 2 or greater were observed in 7 patients <12 months after PBT. Cholangitis was observed in 11 patients and 3 patients required stent replacement.

Conclusions

Relatively high LC rates after PBT for advanced cholangiocarcinoma can be achieved by delivery of a BED10 > 70 Gy. Gastrointestinal toxicities, especially those of the duodenum, are dose-limiting toxicities associated with PBT, and early metastatic progression remains a treatment obstacle.

Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage for Klatskin tumors?

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the preferred biliary drainage technique in patients with Klatskin tumors because few comparative studies exist. This study compared outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 129) with Klatskin tumors treated with initial EBD or PTBD were identified, and their clinical histories were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the time to therapeutic success (TTS), defined as the time between the first drainage and a total bilirubin measurement of 40 μmol/L or lower.

RESULTS

EBD was the first biliary decompression procedure performed in 87 patients; PTBD was performed first in 42. Technical success rates (78% with EBD vs 98% with PTBD; P = .004) and therapeutic success rates (49% vs 79%, respectively; P = .002) were significantly lower in the EBD group than in the PTBD group. Forty-four patients in the EBD group (51%) subsequently underwent PTBD before therapeutic success was achieved or antitumoral treatment was started. Median TTSs were 61 days in the EBD group and 44 days in the PTBD group, and multivariate analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.99; P = .045). In patients treated with surgery or chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy, median times to treatment were 76 and 68 days in the EBD and PTBD groups, respectively (P = .76). Cholangitis occurred in 25% and 21% of patients in the EBD and PTBD groups, respectively (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

PTBD should be seriously considered for biliary decompression when treating patients with Klatskin tumor.

Prognostic Factors after Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Bile Duct Cancer

Prognostic factors influencing long-term survival after radical resection for distal bile duct cancer have not been well established because of the rarity of this malignancy. The goal of this study was to identify main prognostic factors in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma. A retrospective study consisting of 122 patients with distal bile duct cancer who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in three major university hospitals was performed to identify the main prognostic factors. Major surgical complications occurred in 40 patients (32.8%), of whom eight died (6.6%) in the hospital. Overall actuarial survival (excluding hospital deaths) at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up was 82.9, 49.4, and 32.7 per cent, respectively, with a median survival of 36 months. Univariate analysis showed that papillary tumor ( P = 0.045), negative surgical margin (R0 resection, P = 0.005), earlier pT ( P = 0.005), pTNM stage ( P < 0.001), and absence of lymph node involvement ( P < 0.0001) were significant predictors of survival. On multivariate analysis, only lymph node metastasis was shown to be an independent prognostic factor of survival ( P = 0.036). Lymph node involvement was the most important survival predictor after a Whipple resection in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma--controversies and challenges

Cholangiocarcinomas are a diverse group of tumors that are presumed to originate from the biliary tract epithelium either within the liver or the biliary tract. These cancers are often difficult to diagnose, their pathogenesis is poorly understood, and their dismal prognosis has resulted in a nihilistic approach to their management. The two major clinical phenotypes are intrahepatic, mass-forming tumors and large ductal tumors. Among the ductal cancers, lesions at the liver hilum are most prevalent. The risk factors, clinical presentation, natural history and management of these two types of cholangiocarcinoma are distinct. Efforts to improve outcomes for patients with these diseases are affected by several challenges to effective management. For example, designations based on anatomical characteristics have been inconsistently applied, which has confounded analysis of epidemiological trends and assessment of risk factors. The evaluation of therapeutic options, particularly systemic therapies, has been limited by a lack of appreciation of the different phenotypes. Controversies exist regarding the appropriate workup and choice of management approach. However, new and emerging tools for improved diagnosis, expanded indications for surgical approaches, an emerging role for locoregional and intrabiliary therapies and improved systemic therapies provide optimism and hope for improved outcomes in the future.

Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations

The aim of this review is to describe recent advances and topics in the surgical management of bile duct cancer. Radical resection with a microscopically negative margin (R0) is the only way to cure cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with marked survival advantages compared to margin-positive resections. Complete resection of the tumor is the surgeon’s ultimate aim, and several advances in the surgical treatment for bile duct cancer have been made within the last two decades. Multidetector row computed tomography has emerged as an indispensable diagnostic modality for the precise preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer, in terms of both longitudinal and vertical tumor invasion. Many meticulous operative procedures have been established, especially extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, to achieve a negative resection margin, which is the only prognostic factor under the control of the surgeon. A complete caudate lobectomy and resection of the inferior part of Couinaud’s segment IV coupled with right or left hemihepatectomy has become the standard surgical procedure for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is the first choice for distal bile duct cancer. Limited resection for middle bile duct cancer is indicated for only strictly selected cases. Preoperative treatments including biliary drainage and portal vein embolization are also indicated for only selected patients, especially jaundiced patients anticipating major hepatectomy. Liver transplantation seems ideal for complete resection of bile duct cancer, but the high recurrence rate and decreased patient survival after liver transplant preclude it from being considered standard treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a potentially crucial role in prolonging survival and controlling local recurrence, but no definite regimen has been established to date. Further evidence is needed to fully define the role of liver transplantation and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy as therapeutic strategies in extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

this report aims to provide an overview on radiotherapy and chemotherapy in extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma (BDC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

a PubMed research identified clinical trials in BDC through April 1, 2010 including randomised controlled trials, SEER analyses and retrospective trials. Additionally, publications on the technical progress of radiotherapy in or close to the liver were analysed.

RESULTS

most patients with cholangiocarcinoma present with unresectable disease (80-90%), and more than half of the resected patients relapse within 1 year. Adjuvant and palliative treatment options need to be chosen carefully since 50% of the patients are older than 70 years at diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy after complete resection (R0) has not convincingly shown a prolongation of survival but radiotherapy did after R1 resection. However, data suggest that liver transplantation could offer long-term survival in selected patients when combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with marginally resectable disease. For patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), palliative stenting was previously the treatment of choice. But recent SEER analyses show that radiotherapy prolongs survival, relieves symptoms and contributes to biliary decompression and should be regarded as the new standard. Novel technical advances in radiotherapy may allow for dose-escalation and could significantly improve outcome for patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

both the literature and recent technical progress corroborate the role of radiotherapy in BDC offering chances for novel clinical trials. Progress is less pronounced in chemotherapy.

Survival outcomes in resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: effect of adjuvant radiotherapy in a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

PURPOSE

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has not been clearly established. We analyzed survival outcomes of patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and examined the effect of adjuvant RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between 1973 and 2003. The primary endpoint was the overall survival time. Cox regression analysis was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of the following clinical variables: age, year of diagnosis, histologic grade, localized (Stage T1-T2) vs. regional (Stage T3 or greater and/or node positive) stage, gender, race, and the use of adjuvant RT after surgical resection.

RESULTS

The records for 2,332 patients were obtained. Patients with previous malignancy, distant disease, incomplete or conflicting records, atypical histologic features, and those treated with preoperative/intraoperative RT were excluded. Of the remaining 1,491 patients eligible for analysis, 473 (32%) had undergone adjuvant RT. After a median follow-up of 27 months (among surviving patients), the median overall survival time for the entire cohort was 20 months. Patients with localized and regional disease had a median survival time of 33 and 18 months, respectively (p<.001). The addition of adjuvant RT was not associated with an improvement in overall or cause-specific survival for patients with local or regional disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients with localized disease had significantly better overall survival than those with regional disease. Adjuvant RT was not associated with an improvement in long-term overall survival in patients with resected extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Key data, including margin status and the use of combined chemotherapy, was not available through the SEER database.

Radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon but lethal malignancy. We analyzed the role of definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated at a single institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective analysis included 37 patients who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy and/or brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, and univariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of patient- and treatment-related factors on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients received EBRT alone, 8 patients received EBRT plus BT, and 6 patients received BT alone (median follow-up of 14 months). Two patients were alive without evidence of recurrence at the time of analysis. Actuarial OS and LC rates at 1 year were 59% and 90%, respectively, and 22% and 71%, respectively, at 2 years. Two patients lived beyond 5 years without evidence of recurrence. On univariate analysis, EBRT with or without BT improved LC compared to BT alone (97% vs. 56% at 1 year; 75% vs. 56% at 2 years; p = 0.096). Patients who received EBRT alone vs. BT alone also had improved LC (96% vs. 56% at 1 year; 80% vs. 56% at 2 years; p = 0.113). Age, gender, tumor location (proximal vs. distal), histologic differentiation, EBRT dose (≤ or >50 Gy), EBRT planning method (two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional), and chemotherapy were not associated with patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have poor survival. Long-term survival is rare. The majority of patients treated with EBRT had local control at the time of death, suggesting that symptoms due to the local tumor effect might be effectively controlled with radiation therapy, and EBRT is an important element of treatment. Novel treatment approaches are indicated in the therapy for this disease.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and to identify the prognostic factors that influence survival in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from 101 patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer who had undergone postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Of the 101 patients, 52 (51%) had undergone complete resection (R0 resection) and 49 (49%) had microscopic or macroscopic residual tumors (R1 or R2 resection). The median radiation dose was 50 Gy. Also, 85 patients (84%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 47 months for the surviving patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 34% for all patients. A comparison between patients with R0 and R1 resection indicated no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (44% vs. 33%, p=.2779), progression-free survival (35% vs. 22%, p=.3107), or locoregional progression-free survival (75% vs. 63%, p=.2784) rates. An analysis of the first failure site in the 89 patients with R0 or R1 resection indicated isolated locoregional recurrence in 7 patients. Elevated postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (p=.001) and progression-free survival (p=.033). A total of 3 patients developed Grade 3 or greater late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy appears to improve locoregional control and survival in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients with R1 resection. The postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level might be a useful prognostic marker to select patients for more intensified adjuvant therapy.

Brachytherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To examine the role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas in a relatively large group of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, a total of 193 patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated with brachytherapy were identified for the period 1988-2003. The primary analysis compared patients treated with brachytherapy (with or without external-beam radiation) with those who did not receive radiation. To try to account for confounding variables, propensity score and sensitivity analyses were used.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between patients who received radiation (n = 193) and those who did not (n = 6859) with regard to surgery (p < 0.0001), race (p < 0.0001), stage (p < 0.0001), and year of diagnosis (p <0.0001). Median survival for patients treated with brachytherapy was 11 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-13 months), compared with 4 months for patients who received no radiation (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [95% CI]) brachytherapy (0.79 [0.66-0.95]), surgery (0.50 [0.46-0.53]), year of diagnosis (1998-2003: 0.66 [0.60-0.73]; 1993-1997: (0.96 [0.89-1.03; NS], baseline 1988-1992), and extrahepatic disease (0.84 [0.79-0.89]) were associated with better overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest dataset reported for the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas with brachytherapy. The results of this retrospective analysis suggest that brachytherapy may improve overall survival. However, because of the limitations of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, these results should be interpreted cautiously, and future prospective studies are needed.

Multimodality therapy for locoregional extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Although surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Due in part to numeric rarity, the optimum role of radiotherapy (RT) for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, as well as its relative benefit, is an area of debate. The specific aim of this series was to estimate survival for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients receiving surgery and adjuvant RT using a robust population-based data set.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) limited-use data set for selected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cases. Lognormal multivariate survival analysis was implemented to estimate survival for patients for treatment cohorts based on extent of surgical intervention and RT.

RESULTS

Parametric estimated median survival for patients receiving total/radical resection + RT was 26 months; it was 25 months for total/radical resection alone, 25 months for subtotal/debulking resection + RT, 21 months for subtotal/debulking resection, 12 months for RT alone, and 9 months for those not receiving surgery or RT. Parametric multivariate analysis revealed age, American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage, grade, and surgical/radiation regimen as statistically significant covariates with survival. Surgery alone and adjuvant RT cohorts demonstrated evidence of improved survival compared with no treatment; comparatively, RT alone was associated with survival decrement. Early improvement in survival in adjuvant cohorts was not observed at later time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival estimates using SEER data suggest an early survival advantage for adjuvant RT for patients with locoregional extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Although future prospective series are needed to confirm these observations, SEER data represent the largest domestic population-based extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cohort, and may provide useful baseline survival estimates for future studies.

Isolated recurrence of distal adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct on a draining sinus scar after curative resection: case report and review of the literature

Background

Surgical resection remains the gold standard for the treatment of localized adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Yet, treatment of loco-regional recurrences is not well defined.

Case Presentation

We present an unusual case of distal adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts that was treated with surgery and relapsed two years later with a solitary recurrence on the tract of a previous Redon drain. In addition, a review of the literature on management of loco regional relapses is presented.

Conclusions

The ideal management of these patients still remains undefined. Decisions are made based on clinical parameters from retrospective series, such as tumor grade, surgical margins or lymph node involvement. Prospective studies, that include molecular and genetic markers, are needed to improve patient selection and outcomes on this population.

Extrahepatic bile duct cancers: surgery alone versus surgery plus postoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to determine the role of radiotherapy after curative-intent surgery in the management of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1997 through 2005, 78 patients with EHBD cancer were surgically staged. These patients were stratified by the absence of adjuvant radiation (n = 47, group I) versus radiation (n = 31, group II) after resection. Pathology examination showed 27 cases in group I and 20 cases in group II had microscopically positive resection margins. The patients in group II received 45 to 54 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. The primary endpoints of this study were overall survival, disease-free survival, and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the 5-year overall survival rates for the two groups (11.6% in group I vs. 21% in group II). However, the patients with microscopically positive resection margins who received adjuvant radiation therapy had higher median disease-free survival rates than those who underwent surgery alone (21 months vs. 10 months, respectively, p = 0.042). Decreasing local failure was found in patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (61.7% in group I and 35.6% in group II, p = 0.02). Outcomes of the patients with a positive resection margin and lymph node metastasis who received postoperative radiation therapy were doubled compared to those of patients without adjuvant radiotherapy. Resection margin status, lymph node metastasis, and pathology differentiation were significant prognostic factors in disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiotherapy might be useful in patients with EHBD cancer, especially for those patients with microscopic residual tumors and positive lymph nodes after resection for increasing local control.

Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone versus CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: which is better in patients with radically resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancer?: a non-randomized, single center study

Background

There is currently no standard adjuvant therapy for patients with curatively resected extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EHBTC). The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical features and outcomes between patients undergoing adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone and those undergoing CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection.

Methods

We included 120 patients with EHBTC who underwent radical resection and then received adjuvant CCRT with or without further adjuvant chemotherapy between 2000 and 2006 at Seoul National University Hospital.

Results

Out of 120 patients, 30 received CCRT alone, and 90 received CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for CCRT alone and CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were 26.6% and 45.2% (p = 0.04), respectively, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 30.8% and 62.6% (p < 0.01), respectively. CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy showed longer survival than did CCRT alone, especially in R1 resection (microscopically positive margins) or negative lymph node.

Conclusion

Adjuvant CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy prolonged DFS and OS, compared with CCRT alone in patients with curatively resected EHBTC. Adjuvant chemotherapy deserves to consider after adjuvant CCRT. In the future, a randomized prospective study will be needed, with the objective of investigating the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after aggressive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is dismal although aggressive surgery including major hepatectomy has been performed. The aim of this study was to clarify useful prognostic factors and the usefulness of gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who had undergone aggressive surgical resection.

METHODS

Medical records of 42 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate models were used to analyze the effect of various clinicopathological factors on long-term survival.

RESULTS

Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 42 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma were 81%, 42%, and 30%, respectively (median survival time, 21.5 months). Univariate analysis revealed that adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and surgical margin status were associated significantly with long-term survival (P < 0.05). Furthermore, use of a Cox proportional hazards regression model indicated that only adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was a significant independent predictor of a favorable prognosis (P = 0.035). The toxicity of adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was mild. Five-year actuarial survival rates of patients who did or did not receive adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were 57% and 23%, respectively (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy may be a promising strategy to improve survival after surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. A prospective randomized study should be done to confirm the results of this study.

Early detection of extrahepatic bile-duct carcinomas in the nonicteric stage by using MRCP followed by EUS

BACKGROUND

Most extrahepatic bile-duct carcinomas are usually diagnosed when they are already in an advanced stage, which is the main reason for the poor prognosis of this tumor.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the usefulness of MRCP followed by EUS in the early diagnosis of extrahepatic bile-duct carcinoma in the nonicteric stage.

PATIENTS

This study included patients who were nonicteric, who had abnormal serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, and whose common hepatic duct was more than 8 mm in diameter on abdominal US because of unknown reasons.

DESIGN

A single-center, prospective study.

SETTING

An academic medical center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The sensitivity and specificity of MRCP followed by EUS for the early diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma in the nonicteric stage.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients who were nonicteric underwent prospective MRCP, and 26 of them underwent EUS. Ten patients (5 with stricture, 4 with filling defect, and 1 with no stricture or filling defect) had extrahepatic bile-duct carcinoma, including 5 patients with an incidentally diagnosed T1 stage tumor. The sensitivity and specificity of MRCP followed by EUS were 90% and 98%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

A single center and small number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MRCP followed by EUS was highly sensitive and specific for the early diagnosis of extrahepatic bile-duct carcinoma in the nonicteric stage, including T1 stage tumors. Filling defects, as well as stenosis in the bile duct, are important MRCP findings of T1 stage carcinoma.

The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) population-based investigation

PURPOSE

Extrahepatic bile duct cancers (EBDC) are aggressive cancers for which the importance of the use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in potentially curative cases remains the subject of clinical investigation.

METHODS

The 1973-2004 National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was analyzed for patients with EBDC who had undergone cancer-directed surgery. Patients who died <3 months after surgery were excluded from analysis. Patients with distant metastases, with unknown stage or interventions, or benign histologies were excluded.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-six patients were selected. Tumor-related factors, such as regional (vs. local) disease and an increasing number of lymph nodes predicted for the delivery of PORT. In unadjusted univariate analysis, patients treated from 1973 to 2004 who fit the selection criteria had a lower 3-year survival rate if they received PORT vs. no PORT (3 year survival 31.3% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.04), but this improvement did not hold in multivariate survival analysis or in univariate analysis of patient subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on analysis of the SEER database, there was no definitive evidence for improved survival with the addition of PORT to radical surgery. This analysis should be approached with caution given its observational and retrospective nature. In addition, it should be remembered that the SEER database lacks information on the use of chemotherapy, radiation technique, and the completeness of resection.

Adjuvant therapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review of the literature and future directions

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare neoplasm originating from the intra- or extrahepatic bile duct epithelium. Incidence has been increasing worldwide in the last three decades. Complete surgical resection provides the only possibility of cure, but even with resection 5-yr survival can be as low as 11%. Adjuvant therapy has the potential to play a crucial role in prolonging survival and local control. Retrospective series have suggested benefit to adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy or concurrent chemo-radiation. The scarce prospective data has not shown a survival benefit to adjuvant therapy. In this article we review and summarize the published data regarding adjuvant therapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Prospective, multi-institutional randomized trials are needed to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy in this disease.

Extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma: patients at high-risk for local recurrence treated with surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation have an equivalent overall survival to patients with standard-risk treated with surgery alone

BACKGROUND

Patients with resected extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma who have microscopically positive resection margins and/or pathologic locoregional nodal involvement (R1pN1) have a high-risk of locoregional recurrence, and therefore, we advocate the use of adjuvant chemoradiation. To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this treatment, we compared survival and side effects outcomes between such patients and patients with negative resection margins and pathologically negative nodes (R0pN0) who did not receive adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

Between 1984 and 2005, 65 patients were treated with curative-intended resection for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma. Patients with tumors arising in the gallbladder and periampullary region were excluded. Pathology and diagnostic images were centrally reviewed. Overall survival and locoregional recurrence outcomes for patients with standard-risk R0pN0 (surgery alone, or S group, n = 23) were compared with those of patients with high locoregional recurrence risk, R1 and/or pN1 (R1pN1) status who received adjuvant chemoradiation (S-CRT group, n = 42).

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the entire group was 31 months. Patients in the S-CRT and S groups had a similar 5-year overall survival (36% vs. 42%, P = .6) and locoregional recurrence (5-year rate: 38% vs. 37%, P = .13). In the S-CRT group, three patients (7%) experienced an acute (grade 3 or more) side effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding of a lack of a survival difference between the S and S-CRT groups suggests that for patients with extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma at high risk for locoregional recurrence (i.e., R1 resection or pN1 disease), adjuvant chemoradiation provides an equivalent overall survival despite of these worse prognostic features.

Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

To evaluate surgical results and the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, we retrospectively analyzed 27 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection (eight bile duct resections, 18 bile duct resections plus hepatectomy, one hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy). There was no operative mortality, and the morbidity was 37%. Curative resection (R0 resection) was achieved in 20 (74%) patients. Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 44% and 27%, significantly higher than that of 47 patients who did not undergo resection (3.5% and 0% at 3 and 5 years, p < 0.0001). Survival of patients with positive margins (R1/2 resection) was poor; there were no 5-year survivors. However, survival was better than that of patients who did not undergo resection (median survival: 22 vs 9 months, p = 0.0007). Univariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis as a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.043). Median survival of patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of patients who did not (42 vs. 22 months, p = 0.0428). Resection should be considered as the first option for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. There appears to be a survival advantage even in patients with cancer-positive margins. Adjuvant chemotherapy may increase long-term survival.

Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether carcinoma in situ at the bile duct margin is prognostically different from residual invasive carcinoma in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Although there are many reports that the ductal margin status at bile duct resection stumps is a prognostic indicator in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, some patients who undergo resection with microscopic tumor involvement of the bile duct margin survive longer than expected.

METHODS

A retrospective clinicopathological analysis of 128 patients who had undergone surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was conducted. The status of the bile duct resection margin was classified as negative in 105 patients (82.0%), positive for carcinoma in situ in 12 patients (9.4%), and positive for invasive carcinoma in 11 patients (8.6%).

RESULTS

Ductal margin status was an independent prognostic indicator by both univariate (p = 0.0022) and multivariate (p = 0.0105) analyses, along with lymph node metastasis. There was no significant difference between patients with a negative ductal margin and those with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (p = 0.5247). The 5-year survival rate of patients with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (22.2%) was significantly better (p = 0.0241) than with invasive carcinoma (0%). There was a significant relationship between local recurrence and ductal margin status (p = 0.0401).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, invasive carcinoma at the ductal resection margins appears to have a significant relation to local recurrence and also a significant negative impact on survival, whereas residual carcinoma in situ does not. Discrimination whether carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma is present is important in clinical setting in which the resection margin at the ductal stump is positive.

Pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify useful prognostic factors in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The records of 36 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Potential clinicopathological prognostic factors that may affect survival were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. Overall survival rates were 75%, 54%, and 50% for 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively (median survival time, 26 months). Univariate analysis found that age (>== 65 years), pancreatic invasion, duodenal invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion and a positive surgical margin were significant predictors of poor prognosis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, lymph node metastasis was found to be a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis by multivariate analysis (P = 0.043). Moreover, there were significant differences in the 5-year survival between patients with 2 or less involved lymph nodes and those with 3 or more positive nodes (P < 0.001). There were no 2-year survivors of the group of patients with 3 or more positive nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the presence and number of lymph nodes exhibiting metastatic disease might be useful in predicting the postsurgical outcome in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Solitary recurrence of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a mediastinal lymph node two years after curative resection

We recently encountered an unusual case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in which a solitary recurrence in a mediastinal lymph node occurred two years after curative resection of the primary tumor. A 64-year old woman was admitted to our hospital with a complaint of right hypochondrial discomfort. After imaging studies demonstrated a hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the left hepatic duct, a curative resection of the tumor was performed, consisting of a left hepatic lobectomy along with caudate lobectomy, regional lymph node dissection, and resection of the extrahepatic bile duct. No nodal metastasis was observed histologically. Two years after surgery, the patient was found to have a nodule in the posterior mediastinum, which was thoracoscopically resected. No other swollen lymph nodes, local recurrence, or distant metastasis were noted. Histologically, the nodule proved to be a metastatic lymph node, and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was initiated. The patient remained well for the four years following her first operation and had no evidence of disease recurrence 28 mo after her second operation. To our knowledge, this case is the first report of solitary recurrence in a mediastinal lymph node after curative resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and surgical margin status for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prognostic indicators for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma have not been confirmed because of its rarity. The aim of this study was to identify useful prognostic factors in patients undergoing surgical resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Charts of 43 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 35 patients, and segmental bile duct resection in 8. Potential clinicopathological prognostic factors were examined by univariate and multivariate survival analysis.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred after surgery in 19 patients (44%), but there was no mortality. Overall survival rates were 72%, 53%, and 44% for 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (median survival time, 26.0 months). Univariate analysis found that older age, pathological pancreatic invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, positive surgical margin, and TNM stages II and III were significant predictors of poor prognosis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, lymph node metastasis and positive surgical margin were found to be significant independent predictors of poor prognosis with a Cox proportional hazards regression model (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that lymph node metastasis and positive surgical margin as determined by surgical resection might be useful in predicting post-surgical outcome in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in microscopic tumor control after extrahepatic bile duct cancer surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate effects of radiotherapy (RT) after surgery for extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer.

METHODS

There were 60 patients with EHBD cancer treated with postoperative RT. Surgical extents were R0 in 24 patients, R1 in 23, and R2 in 13. The indications for adjuvant RT were positive resection margin, lymph node metastasis, or more than pT2. Radiation was delivered to tumor bed and regional lymphatics, and for R1 or R2 patients, boost RT was planned. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated and survival in the R0 and R1 patients with negative lymph nodes was compared. The pattern of treatment failures and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 2- and 5-year survival rates were 36.6% and 12.3% for OS, and 31.2% and 16.2% for PFS. In comparison of R0 with R1 patients who had negative lymph node, 2-year OS and PFS were 53.0% and 55.0% in R0, and 40.7% and 36.7% in R1 (P = ns). The first site of failure was loco-regional in 29 patients. The lymph node metastasis was a significant prognostic factor in OS (P = 0.04) and PFS (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis was a poor prognostic factor and adjuvant RT may be useful in patients with microscopic residual tumor. However, because there were high loco-regional recurrences, additional study is needed to determine more effective RT such as increased RT dose or use of radiosensitizers.

Particle radiation therapy for gastrointestinal malignancies

Treatment-related toxicity is common in the radiotherapeutic management of cancers of the gastrointestinal tract. These toxicities can diminish treatment efficacy by necessitating treatment breaks, limiting the radiation dose that can be delivered, and hindering concomitant use of chemotherapy and targeted drug agents. Many efforts have focused on widening the gap between the likelihood of tumor control and the likelihood of toxicities associated with radiation. Use of particles that exhibit a Bragg peak phenomenon in their interactions with tissue, such as protons, heavier ions like carbon ions, and pions, is one means of concentrating radiation dose in tumors and away from normal tissues. Neutron beams have also been used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers in an effort to take advantage of their potent biologic effects. This report reviews basic particle radiation physics and biology, as well as the clinical experience with protons, heavier ions, pions, and neutrons in the treatment of various gastrointestinal malignancies. Potential future directions in clinical research with particle therapy are discussed.

Major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma type 3 and 4: prognostic factors and longterm outcomes

BACKGROUND

Radical operation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, including major hepatectomy with vascular resection, seems to improve longterm survival. This study retrospectively evaluates several prognostic risk factors that can influence survival after resection of types 3 to 4 Klatskin tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 1984 and 2003, 59 patients (36 men and 23 women) with types 3 to 4 hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent liver resection with curative intent. Medical records and pathologic findings were reviewed to assess prognostic risk factors and survival. Disease-free and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82%, 45%, and 20% respectively. In-hospital mortality was 5% and morbidity was 42%. In multivariable analysis, male gender (relative risk [RR] = 5.4; 95% CI, 2.2 to 13.5), absence of preoperative chemotherapy (RR = 4; 95% CI, 1.5 to 10.7), R1 biliary tract margin (RR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.4), and metastatic celiac lymph nodes (RR = 19.9; 95% CI, 4 to 71.4) were found to be independent factors for overall survival. Pedicular metastatic lymph nodes were not associated with poorer overall survival. If biliary positive-margin is the only risk factor, the 5-year estimated overall survival is 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Major hepatectomy can improve outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Compared with nonoperative treatment or R0 hepatectomy, R1 resection in patients with no other risk factor can offer longterm survival.

Could a high resectability rate improve the long-term survival of patients with proximal bile duct cancer?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate if high resectability rate could improve the long-term outcome of patients with proximal bile duct cancer.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2001, 50 patients (34 male and 16 female) with proximal bile duct cancer were treated. Thirty-six patients (72%) were considered suitable for surgery, while 14 underwent nonsurgical palliative procedures. Twenty patients had bile duct resection only. Ten patients had Roux-en-Y cholangiojejunostomy with two or three divided segmental hepatic ducts; in 10 patients, the cholangiojejunostomy was performed with four or five divided segmental hepatic ducts. Three patients were treated by palliative transtumoral intubation with Kehr tube. Thirteen patients had bile duct resection plus hepatectomy. Despite the curative intention of the operation, only in 19 (52.7%) patients did the histopathological examination reveal tumor-free margins.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Postoperative morbidity was 25%. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of the entire surgical group was 61%, 22.5%, and 9%, respectively. In the 19 patients treated with curative intent the survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 63.1%, 31.5%, and 15.8%, respectively, while in the group that had palliative treatment it was 45%, 15%, and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Only margins free from tumor can guarantee an improvement in long-term outcome. Increasing resectability improves survival and could offer a chance of better long-term survival.

Effectiveness of Radiation Therapy After Surgery for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Some studies suggest that giving radiation therapy after surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma improves the survival rate; however, many of these studies did not specify numbers of subjects or provide an impartial analysis. Thus, we evaluated the effectiveness of radiation therapy as adjuvant treatment after surgery and attempted to establish appropriate adaptation standards.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 69 patients who underwent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between June 1980 and April 1998. Thirty-nine patients were treated with surgery followed by radiation therapy and 30 were treated with surgery alone.

RESULTS

The clinicopathologic features that might have influenced prognosis were similar in the patients who received radiation therapy and those who did not. Radiation as adjuvant therapy did not have a beneficial effect on overall survival (P = 0.554, log-rank test); however, it tended to improve survival in the group of patients who underwent curative resection for with p-stage III or IVa disease (P = 0.042, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy after surgery did not show any clinical benefits for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, it may be effective as adjuvant therapy after curative resection in a small subgroup of patients with p-stage III or IVa disease.

Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to analyze the actual long-term outcome after the surgical resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and to identify the characteristics shared by long-term survivors (5 years or longer).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although reported 5-year survival rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer lie between 20% and 30%, these data are not reflecting the actual cure rate. Some patients survive longer than 5 years with recurrent disease. In some patients, recurrence is detected after 5 years. Accordingly, true cure rate is probably substantially lower than the 5-year survival rate.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-one patients from a total of 282 patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer (excluding ampulla of Vater cancer) underwent surgical resection between 1986 and 1997. We analyzed the actual survival outcome and postresection prognostic factors after resection, which included hepatobiliary resection (HBR; extended either right or left hepatectomy, caudate lobectomy, and hilar bile duct resection, n = 23), bile duct resection (BDR; n = 25), and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD; n = 103). We also compared the clinicopathologic characteristics of actual long-term survivors (n = 49) with those who survived longer than 5 years and with short-term (<5 years) survivors.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of the 151 resection cases (32.5%) survived 5 years or longer; there was no 5-year survivor in the nonresected cases. The actual 5-year survival rate was 47.8% after HBR (11 of 23), 28.0% after BDR (7 of 25), and 30.1% after PD (31 of 103) (P = 0.083). Tumor histology and lymph node metastasis were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. Some long-term survivors had poor postoperative prognostic factors such as T3, lymph node metastasis, or microscopic margin involvement, but none with a poorly differentiated tumor. Seven long-term survivors had recurrent disease at 5 years, and recurrence was detected after 5 years in 8 more patients. Therefore, the actual cure rate (<19.2%) was substantially less than the 5-year survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of extrahepatic bile duct cancer, resection should be considered and efforts should be made to obtain a tumor-free margin. An aggressive surgical approach will give some survival benefit to the patients with even advanced disease. Long-term follow up is needed before declaring "a cure," because late recurrence after 5 years is detected not infrequently. Adjuvant therapy, local and systemic, needs to be further developed.

Diagnostic and surgical therapeutic features of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma without jaundice

AIM: To analyze the diagnostic and therapeutic features of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBDC) without jaundice.

METHODS: Between 1985 and 1999, 101 patients underwent surgery for EBDC in Xiangya Hospital. These patients were divided into two groups: 84 jaundiced patients and 17 non-jaundiced patients according to preoperative serum total bilirubin levels. The clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, location, pathology and surgical resectability of the tumors were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: The laboratory parameters such as hemoglobin, serum albumin ALB, AKP, γ -GT, and sonography appearance were similar between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in tumor location, pathological type and resectability. However, the number of non-jaundiced patients associated with chololithiasis was significantly greater than that of jaundiced patients (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION: The presence of jaundice is not a reliable criterion for the prediction of the resectability and the extent of tumor progression in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Decreased levels of blood hemoglobin and serum albumin, elevated levels of AKP and γ -GT, and /or abnormal sonography may be suggestive. Biopsy of a stenotic or thickened bile duct is strongly recommended for a correct diagnosis before the appearance of jaundice.

Prognostic value of intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocyte in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as essential immune response

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes form an important aspect of the host defense against an expanding neoplasm. CD8+ T cells have been identified as a prognostic factor in several cancers. Here, we investigate that the influence of CD8+ T cells on extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBDC) patient survival.

METHODS

CD8+ T cell immunoreactivity in 58 surgically resected EBDC specimens was investigated. The relationship between CD8+ T cell immunoreactivity and clinical and histopathologic features was analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two tumors (55%) possessed intratumoral CD8+ T cells. The degree of intratumoral CD8+ T cell immunoreactivity demonstrated a significant relationship to lower numbers of lymph node metastasis, reduced venous invasion, decreased perineural invasion, and better pTNM staging. Intratumoral CD8- T cells were also associated with increased patient survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of intratumoral CD8+ T cells was an independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The infiltration of a cancer cell nest by CD8+ T cells is a reliable marker predicting increased survival of patients with EBDC.

Intraluminal low-dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy and biliary stenting for unresectable extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of combined-modality therapy, including external beam radiotherapy, intraluminal (192)Ir, and biliary stenting for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1988 and 1998, 93 patients with unresectable extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma underwent definitive radiotherapy. The dose of external beam radiotherapy was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Low-dose-rate (192)Ir was delivered at a dose of 27-50 Gy (mean 39.2) at 0.5 cm from the source. An expandable metallic endoprosthesis was used to establish an internal bile passage.

RESULTS

The median survival was 12 months, with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate of 50%, 10%, and 4%, respectively. Tumor length, hepatic invasion, and distant metastasis significantly affected survival. Ninety-six percent of patients could successfully remove external drainage catheters. The actuarial biliary patency rate for these patients at 1, 3, and 5 years was 52%, 29%, and 18%, respectively. Tumor length, tumor diameter and T stage were significantly associated with the patency rate. Mild-to-severe gastroduodenal complications were observed in 32 patients and were significantly associated with the active length of (192)Ir and linear source activity. Eight patients had treatment-related biliary fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Our combined-modality therapy provided reasonable local control and improved the quality of life of patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Because none of the treatment characteristics had any impact on survival or biliary patency, lower dose levels and/or a localized target volume are recommended to minimize morbidity.

Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings

BACKGROUND

Bile duct brushing cytology is a common procedure for the exclusion of adenocarcinoma in the bile duct. The authors evaluated the use of ThinPrep (TP) to determine whether the information obtained is equivalent to that found with conventional smear cytology (CS).

METHODS

Thirty-eight prospectively collected endoscope retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided bile duct brushing samples were split in the following manner. First, two to four CS were prepared and immediately spray-fixed or wet-fixed. Second, the remaining sample was rinsed in PreservCyt (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, MA). In the laboratory, one TP slide was prepared from each sample. TP and CS were stained by routine Papanicolaou stain. For the current study, TP and CS were reviewed independently by two cytopathologists. The diagnoses made by the two methods were compared with the final histology.

RESULTS

The cytologic diagnoses for both TP and CS were categorized into five main groups: 1) unsatisfactory, 2) negative, 3) reactive, 4) suspicious for malignancy, and 5) malignant. The diagnoses on the 38 TP bile duct brushings and CS were categorized as follows: 1) unsatisfactory-2, 4; 2) negative-7, 4; 3) reactive-10, 14; 4) suspicious for malignancy-9, 9; and 5) malignant-10, 7, respectively. Histologic follow-up was available in 14 cases (reactive-4, suspicious for malignancy-1, and malignant-9). The sensitivity was 77% for TP and 66% for CS. The specificity was 100% for both methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The two methods described in the current study detected equivalent disease on bile duct brushings. TP was found to provide better preservation and cytologic detail. However, the diagnostic criteria may require modification.

Cholangiocarcinoma: the impact of tumor location and treatment strategy on outcome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the outcome of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHBC) may have been influenced by tumor location and treatment selection. The primary endpoint of this study is overall survival (OS). Between January 1983 and December 1997, 221 patients with biliary tumors were evaluated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Of these, 118 fit the inclusion criteria for this study. The extent of disease was assessed by computed tomography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography. All patients had histologic confirmation of malignancy. Roux-en Y, hepaticojejunostomy, or choledochojejunostomy followed surgical resection of the primary tumor. Palliative measure (PS) included biliary catheter placement without brachytherapy or external beam irradiation (RT). RT was delivered via high-energy photons. Intraluminal brachytherapy was performed via percutaneous biliary catheterization with iridium-192 ribbon sources. Chemotherapy consisted of either intravenous 5-fluorouracil alone or in combination with doxorubicin, mitomycin C, or paclitaxel. PS consisted of metal bile duct stent placement. Median follow-up time for the entire group was 102 months and 43 months for patients who were still alive at the conclusion of the study period. Patients with proximal tumors underwent resection (n = 5), surgery and RT (n = 23), RT only (n = 31), chemotherapy only (n = 6), or PS (n = 12). Patients with distal tumors were treated with surgical resection (n = 17) or a combination of surgery and RT (n = 13), RT only (n = 6), or PS (n = 4). Median survival time (MST) for all 118 patients was 22 months. The MST for patients with distal tumors was 47 months versus 17 months for those with proximal tumors. The MST has not been reached for patients with distal EHBC treated with surgical resection and postoperative RT, whereas the median survival for those treated with surgery alone is 62.5 months. However, 4 of 17 of these patients had in situ carcinoma. Six patients had distal tumors treated with RT only with a MST of 6 months. Patients with proximal tumors treated with surgery and RT had a superior OS at 5 years compared to patients treated with RT alone (24 vs. 13 months; p = 0.007). There was an improved OS in patients with proximal tumors treated with surgical resection and RT compared to surgery alone (p = 0.023). There is no discernable influence of chemotherapy on outcome in patients with proximal EHBC. The MST for patients treated with PS was 3.5 months. Surgery and postoperative RT appear to be better than either surgery or RT alone in patients with proximal EHBC. In patients with distal EHBC, the addition of resection and RT appears to offer an advantage, which is increasingly apparent with longer follow-up time. The prognosis remains dismal for patients treated with palliative intent.

Immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with otherwise node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis has prognostic significance in patients with histologically node-negative (pN0) hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The clinical significance of immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastasis recently has been evaluated in various tumors. However, no reports have addressed this issue with regard to hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 954 lymph nodes from surgical specimens of 45 patients with histologically node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent macroscopically curative resection were immunostained with monoclonal antibody against cytokeratins 8 and 18. The results were examined for relationships with clinical and pathologic features and with patient survival.

RESULTS

Lymph node micrometastases were detected immunohistochemically in 11 (24.4%) of the 45 patients, being found in 13 (1.4%) of 954 lymph nodes examined. Of the 13 nodal micrometastases, 11 (84.6%) were found in the N2 regional lymph node group rather than N1. Clinicopathologic features showed no associations with lymph node micrometastases. Survival curves were essentially similar between patients with and without micrometastasis. In addition, the grade of micrometastasis showed no effect on survival. The Cox proportional hazard model identified microscopic venous invasion, microscopic resection margin status, and histologic differentiation as significant prognostic factors in patients with pN0 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node micrometastasis has no survival impact in patients with otherwise node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The authors do not recommend extensive lymph node sectioning with keratin immunostaining for prognostic evaluation.

Role of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of extrahepatic bile duct cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation for patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer who had undergone either curative or palliative surgery, and to identify the prognostic factors for these patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 1982 and December 1994, 91 patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer underwent RT at the Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital. Of these patients, 84 were included in this retrospective study. The male/female ratio was 3.7:1 (66 men and 18 women). The median age of the patients was 58 years (range 33-76). Gross total surgical resection was performed in 72 patients, with pathologically negative margins in 47 and microscopically positive margins in 25. Twelve patients underwent surgical exploration and biopsy or subtotal resection with palliative bypass procedures. All the patients received >40 Gy of external beam RT after surgery. Concurrent 5-fluorouracil was administered during external beam RT in 71 patients, and maintenance chemotherapy was performed in 61 patients after RT completion. The minimal follow-up of the survivors was 14 months, and the median follow-up period for all the patients was 23 months (range 2-75).

RESULTS

The overall 2- and 5-year survival rate was 52% and 31%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rate was 48% and 26%, respectively. On univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, the use of chemotherapy, performance status, N stage, size of residual tumor, stage, and tumor location were significant prognostic factors. However, on multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model, N stage (N0 vs. N1 and N2, p = 0.02) was the only significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival can be expected in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer who undergo radical surgery and postoperative chemoradiation. Regional lymph node metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for these patients.