Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal vein invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma

Loss of Kaiso expression in breast cancer cells prevents intra-vascular invasion in the lung and secondary metastasis

The metastatic activity of breast carcinomas results from complex genetic changes in epithelial tumor cells and accounts for 90% of deaths in affected patients. Although the invasion of the local lymphatic vessels and veins by malignant breast tumor cells and their subsequent metastasis to the lung, has been recognized, the mechanisms behind the metastatic activity of breast tumor cells to other distal organs and the pathogenesis of metastatic cancer are not well understood. In this study, we utilized derivatives of the well-established and highly metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line MDA-MB-231 (MDA-231) to study breast tumor metastasis in a mouse model. These MDA-231 derivatives had depleted expression of Kaiso, a POZ-ZF transcription factor that is highly expressed in malignant, triple negative breast cancers. We previously reported that Kaiso depletion attenuates the metastasis of xenografted MDA-231 cells. Herein, we describe the pathological features of the metastatic activity of parental (Kaiso^positive) versus Kaiso^depleted MDA-231 cells. Both Kaiso^positive and Kaiso^depleted MDA-231 cells metastasized from the original tumor in the mammary fat pad to the lung. However, while Kaiso^positive cells formed large masses in the lung parenchyma, invaded large pulmonary blood vessels and formed secondary metastases and large tumors in the distal organs, Kaiso^depleted cells metastasized only to the lung where they formed small metastatic lesions. Importantly, intravascular invasion and secondary metastases in distal organs were not observed in mice xenografted with Kaiso^depleted cells. It thus appears that the lung may constitute a barrier for less invasive breast tumors such as the Kaiso^depleted TNBC cells; this barrier may limit tumor growth and prevents Kaiso^depleted TNBC cells from invading the pulmonary blood vessels and forming secondary metastases in distal organs.

Meta-analysis and cost effective analysis of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatoduodenectomy: Impact on margin status and survival

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection (PSMVR) with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. This study assesses the impact of PSMVR on resection margin status and survival.

METHOD

An electronic search was performed to identify relevant articles. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for outcomes using the fixed or random-effects models for meta-analysis. A decision analytical model was developed for estimating cost effectiveness.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with 4145 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were included: 1207 patients had PSMVR and 2938 patients had no PSMVR. The R1 resection rate and post-operative mortality was significantly higher in PSMVR group (OR1.59[1.35, 1.86] p=<0.0001, and OR1.72 [1.02,2.92] p = 0.04 respectively). The overall survival at 5-years was worse in the PSMVR group (HR0.20 [0.07,0.55] P = 0.020). Tumour size (p = 0.030) and perineural invasion (P = 0.009) were higher in the PSMVR group. Not performing PSMVR yielded cost savings of $1617 per additional month alive without reduction in overall outcome.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of retrospective data this study shows that PD with PSMVR is associated with a higher R1 rate, lower 5-year survival and is not cost-effective. It appears that PD with PSMVR can only be justified if R0 resection can be achieved. The continuing challenge is accurate selection of these patients.

Resection of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcomes of surgical resection of borderline resectable (BL) and locally advanced (LA) 'unresectable' pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A review of a prospectively maintained database for pancreatic resections was undertaken to identify patients undergoing resection for BL and LA pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2007 and December 2012. Clinicopathological, surgical and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with LA (n = 34) or BL cancer (n = 11) underwent surgery after a mean (± SD) of 7 ± 4 preoperative chemotherapy cycles. Ninety-day mortality was 6.7%, and overall morbidity was 33.3%. An R0 resection was achieved in 34 patients, and 4 patients showed a complete pathological response. Overall median postoperative survival was 17 months (21 after the start of neoadjuvant treatment). Overall and disease-free survival was 74.9 and 43.6% at 1 year and 21.2 and 10.3% at 3 years, respectively. In BL cancer patients, the 3-year survival was significantly higher compared to that of LA cancer patients (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative intent resection in BL and LA cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be achieved with reasonable mortality and morbidity and an encouraging 3-year survival. After neoadjuvant therapy, resection provides a better overall survival for BL compared to LA cancer patients.

Clinicopathologic study of intrapancreatic cancer spread in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to clarify the type of intrapancreatic spread of cancer of the pancreatic body and tail and to assess whether a 2-cm transection margin is adequate to ensure negative margins.

METHODS

We selected 66 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for cancer of the pancreatic body and tail. We investigated intrapancreatic cancer spread in these patients histopathologically and analyzed the relationship between 2-cm-margin positivity and other clinicopathological characteristics.

RESULTS

Two-centimeter-margin positivity was observed in 17 cases. In these, tumors had a tendency to spread toward the pancreatic head along the main pancreatic duct. As a result of statistical analysis, we considered venous invasion (odds ratio [OR], 15.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-148.94; P = 0.0177), 2-cm-margin fibrosis (OR, 173.88; 95% CI, 8.96-3375.03; P = 0.0007), and 2-cm-margin hardness (OR, 5.97; 95% CI, 1.07-33.46; P = 0.0420) as being independently related to 2-cm-margin positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that 2 cm is not a safe length to ensure a negative margin. In the future, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the degree of fibrosis of pancreatic parenchyma could lead to cancer-free pancreatic cut-end margins.

Correlation between radiographic classification and pathological grade of portal vein wall invasion in pancreatic head cancer

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective study was performed to clarify the correlation between radiographic type of portal vein (PV) invasion and pathological grade of PV wall invasion, and their correlation with postoperative prognosis.

BACKGROUND

In many patients with pancreatic cancer, PV resection is necessary to increase resectability and obtain cancer-free margins.

METHODS

We analyzed 671 patients who had undergone surgery for invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas between July 1981 and June 2010. Radiographic types of PV invasion of pancreatic head cancer were classified into A (normal), B (unilateral narrowing), C (bilateral narrowing), or D (complete obstruction with collateral veins), by portography or computed tomography. Pathological grades of PV wall invasion were classified as 0 (no invasion), 1 (tunica adventitia), 2 (tunica media), or 3 (tunica intima).

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-three patients underwent resection, and PV resection was performed in 297. Combined arterial vessel resection was performed in 16 cases. No significant difference in operative mortality was observed between PV preservation (0.6%) and PV-only resection (2.1%), and no operative deaths occurred after 1999. Radiographic classification of PV invasion correlated with incidence of pathological PV wall invasion. In pancreatic head carcinoma, no pathological PV wall invasion was observed in type A (n = 111). Pathological PV invasion was observed in 51% of type B (42/82), 74% of type C (72/97), and 93% of type D (63/68). Long-term survival (>5 years) was observed in types A and B, and grades 0 and 1 subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatectomy with PV resection can be performed safely. Even in radiographic classification type B, pathological PV wall invasion was observed in 51% of patients. Long-term survival was observed in types A and B, and grades 0 and 1.

Prognostic implications of intraoperative radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To assess the prognostic effect of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed 198 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, which was found during experimental laparotomy. Liver metastasis was observed in 70 patients, peritoneal metastasis in 44, liver and peritoneal metastasis in 23 and locally advanced tumor in 61. Treatment consisted of IORT with or without postoperative chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors were evaluated for each pattern of disease spread.

RESULTS

IORT was performed in 120 patients, and chemotherapy was administered in 80. Sixty patients did not receive either treatment. OS in the untreated group was significantly inferior to that for IORT alone and IORT plus gemcitabine (GEM)-based chemotherapy. IORT and GEM-based chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, p < 0.001; HR = 0.43, p < 0.001]. IORT was an independent prognostic determinant for patients with peritoneal metastasis (HR = 0.24, p = 0.011) but not for those with liver metastasis (HR = 0.78, p = 0.381).

CONCLUSION

IORT followed by GEM-based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment strategy in unresectable pancreatic cancer. and IAP.

Selection and outcome of portal vein resection in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. Five-year survival of pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy is very low, and surgical resection is the only option to cure this dismal disease. The standard surgical procedure is pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head cancer. The morbidity and especially the mortality of PD have been greatly reduced. Portal vein resection in pancreatic cancer surgery is one attempt to increase resectability and radicality, and the procedure has become safe to perform. Clinicohistopathological studies have shown that the most important indication for portal vein resection in patients with pancreatic cancer is the ability to obtain cancer-free surgical margins. Otherwise, portal vein resection is contraindicated.

Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: Imaging modalities, preoperative diagnosis and surgical management

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, and surgical resection remains the only chance for curative therapy. In the absence of metastatic disease, which would preclude resection, assessment of vascular invasion is an important parameter for determining resectability of pancreatic cancer. A frequent error is to misdiagnose an involved major vessel. Obviously, surgical exploration with pathological examination remains the “gold standard” in terms of evaluation of resectability, especially from the point of view of vascular involvement. However, current imaging modalities have improved and allow detection of vascular invasion with more accuracy. A venous resection in pancreatic cancer is a feasible technique and relatively reliable. Nevertheless, a survival benefit is not achieved by curative resection in patients with pancreatic cancer and vascular invasion. Although the discovery of an arterial invasion during the operation might require an aggressive management, discovery before the operation should be considered as a contraindication. Detection of vascular invasion remains one of the most important challenges in pancreatic surgery. The aim of this article is to provide a complete review of the different imaging modalities in the detection of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: influence of resection margin status on survival

OBJECTIVES

Although a positive resection margin has been reported to be a strong prognostic factor after resection for pancreatic cancer, several studies indicated that resection status did not independently affect survival. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of resection margin status on survival after extended radical resection for pancreatic head cancer.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-eight cases of pancreatoduodenectomy and 38 cases of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The resection margins were negative (R0) in 115 patients (65.3%), microscopically positive (R1) in 38 patients (21.6%), and grossly positive (R2) in 23 patients (13.1%). Patients with R1 resection survived significantly shorter (median survival time [MST], 9.4 months) than R0 resection patients (MST, 15.2 months) but survived longer than R2 resection patients (MST, 6.2 months). By multivariate analysis, R2 resection, together with lymph node metastasis, portal venous system, and extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasions, independently affected the overall survival, but R1 resection was not significantly influential.

CONCLUSIONS

R2 resection was an independent predictor of poor prognosis after pancreatoduodenectomy/pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, whereas R1 resection did not independently affect the survival.

Pancreatic cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a contraindication for radical surgery?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the operative indications for pancreatic cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastases (No. 16 [+]).

METHODS

Between July 1981 and March 2007, 335 patients with pancreatic cancer including 45 No. 16 (+) patients underwent extended radical surgery at the Department of Surgery II, Nagoya University. The overall survival rates and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in survival between the No. 16 (+) patients and the unresectable cases, there were some long-term survivors among the No. 16 (+) patients. Multivariate analysis of the No. 16 (+) patients identified age (59 years or younger), tumor size (>4 cm), and pathologically confirmed portal invasion (pPV[+]) as independent prognostic factors. The survival of No. 16 (+) patients without these factors was significantly better than the unresectable cases. The survival of patients with only 1 metastatic paraaortic lymph node also was significantly better than the unresectable cases, and tended to be better than those with more than 2 metastatic nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

No. 16 (+) pancreatic cancer patients with age 60 years or older, tumor size 4 cm or less, and pPV(-) may benefit from resection.

Value of Multidetector-row Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Portal Vein Invasion by Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although knowledge of cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation is vitally important in planning an operation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the diagnostic capability of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for this purpose has not been assessed. We evaluated how well MDCT could identify cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and June 2005, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was resected in 87 patients, 83 of whom underwent MDCT within 1 month before the surgery. Three-dimensional volume-rendered (3DVR) and multiplanar reformation (MPR) images were examined for evidence of portal vein invasion. Agreement with intraoperative and pathologic findings was assessed. Portal bifurcation findings by 3DVR and MPR were classified into no portal vein stenosis, unilateral stenosis, or more extensive stenosis, and also into tumor contact with the bifurcation in no, one of two, or two projections.

RESULTS

For macroscopic portal vein invasion, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 81.5, 91.1, 81.5, 91.1, and 88.0% in 3D portography and 96.3, 92.6, 86.7, 98.1, and 94.0% in MPR, respectively. Findings by both 3DVR and MPR were significantly correlated with depth of cancer invasion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MDCT is useful in assessing cancer invasion of the portal vein bifurcation by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Staging of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Preoperative staging of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is important in determining the best treatment plan. Several classification systems have been suggested to determine the operability and extent of surgery. Longitudinal tumor extent is especially important in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma because operative methods differ depending on the tumor extent. The Bismuth-Corlette classification system provides useful information when planning for surgery. However, this classification system is not adequate for selecting surgical candidates. Anatomic variation of the bile duct and gross morphology of the tumor must be considered simultaneously. Lateral spread of the tumor can be evaluated based on the TNM staging provided by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). However, there is a potential for ambiguity in the distinction of T1 and T2 cancer from one another. In addition, T stage does not necessarily mean invasiveness. Blumgart T staging is helpful for the assessment of resectability with the consideration of nodal status and distant metastasis as suggested by the AJCC cancer staging system. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the primary tools used in the assessment of longitudinal and lateral spread of a tumor when determining respectability. Diagnostic laparoscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) may play additional roles in this regard.

Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

The resectability rate and postoperative survival rate for pancreatic carcinoma are poor. Aggressive resection including vascular resection and extended lymphadenectomy represent one strategy for improving survival. This study was carried out to clarify the indications for extended resection, especially vascular resection, for pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

From July 1981 to March 2005, we performed curative resection in 289 of 443 patients with pancreatic carcinoma in our department (65.2%). Vascular resection was performed in 201 (69.5%) patients and portal vein resection without arterial resection in 186 patients. Combined portal and arterial resection was performed in 14 patients and arterial resection without portal vein resection in 1. Extended lymphadenectomy including paraaortic lymph nodes was done. The postoperative survival rate was stratified according to operative and pathology findings.

RESULTS

Operative mortality (any death within 30 days after surgery) occurred in 11 of the 289 curative resection patients (3.8%), including 1 of 88 patients without vascular resection (1.1%), 5 of 186 portal vein resection patients without arterial resection (2.7%), and 5 of 14 (35.7%) arterial resection patients undergoing portal vein arterial resection as well. Most patients who survived for 2 to 3 years had carcinoma-free surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important indication for vascular resection in patients with pancreatic cancer is the ability to obtain cancer-free surgical margins. Otherwise, vascular resection is contraindicated. Extended lymphadenectomy may be not of benefit.

Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection

The role of superior mesenteric-portal vein resection (SM-PVR) for vein invasion or tumor adherence during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still under debate. We investigated morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival in patients who underwent PD with or without SM-PVR. Between July 1994 and December 2004, 222 PD (78% pylorus preserving, 19% Whipple, and 3% total pancreatectomy) were performed for malignant disease. Fifty-three patients (24%) had PD with SM-PVR. Sixty-eight percent of the venous resections were performed as wedge excisions and 32% as segmental resections. Long-term survival was analyzed in 165 patients with pancreatic (n = 110), ampullary (n = 33), or distal bile (n = 22) duct cancer using univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox regression) methods. In patients undergoing PD with SM-PVR and conclusive histologic examination of the resected vein specimen (n = 42), 60% had true tumor involvement of the venous wall, whereas 40% had no proven tumor infiltration. In the complete study group, negative resection margins were obtained in 69% of patients with SM-PVR and in 79% of patients without SM-PVR (P = 0.09). Median duration of surgery was 500 minutes (SM-PVR) versus 440 minutes (no SM-PVR; P < 0.001). Volume of intraoperatively transfused blood was 600 ml (median) in both groups. Postoperative surgical complications/mortality occurred in 23%/3.8% (SM-PVR) versus 35%/4.1% (no SM-PVR); P = 0.09/0.9. Analysis of long-term survival in all 165 patients included 41 with SM-PVR. Five-year survival rates were 15% in cancer of the pancreatic head, 22% in ampullary cancer, and 24% in distal bile duct cancer (P = 0.02). Long-term survival was not influenced by the need for SM-PVR in any of the different tumor entities. In multivariate analysis, a positive resection margin (P < 0.01, relative risk [RR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-2.7), a histologically undifferentiated tumor (P = 0.01, RR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.5), and the tumor entity (P < 0.01) were significant predictors of survival. Univariate survival analysis of the 110 patients with cancer of the pancreatic head revealed that a histologically undifferentiated tumor (P = 0.05) and positive resection margins (P = 0.02) were associated with a poorer survival. In multivariate analysis, the resection margin (P = 0.02, RR: 5.1, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8) and a histologically undifferentiated tumor (P = 0.05, RR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.0-2.5) significantly influenced survival. After PD, perioperative morbidity and long-term survival in patients with SM-PVR were similar to those of patients without vein resection. In case of tumor adherence or infiltration, combined resection of the pancreatic head and the vein should always be considered in the absence of other contraindications for resection.

Oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery

Despite the development of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, pancreatic carcinoma has not yet been detected in the early stage. Surgical resection provides the only chance for cure or long-term survival. The resection rate has increased due to recent advances in surgical techniques and the application of extensive surgery. However, the postoperative prognosis has been poor due to commonly occurring liver metastasis, local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination. Recent molecular-biological studies have clarified occult metastasis, micrometastasis and systemic disease in pancreatic cancer. Several oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery are discussed in the present review.

The potential of oncolytic virus therapy for pancreatic cancer

The objective of this paper was to review a new category of gene therapy using oncolytic viruses for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The eligibility and feasibility of oncolytic virus therapy as a novel therapeutic agent against pancreatic cancer are discussed as well as basic research for clinical trials, including a historical perspective and the current status of these novel agents. Even combination therapy, such as surgery with radiation and chemotherapy, has not significantly improved the survival rate of pancreatic cancer. Recently, a clinical trial (phase I and II) using an oncolytic adenovirus, ONYX-015, was completed in patients with pancreatic cancer. The phase II trial yielded beneficial results (tumor reduction or stabilization) in about 50% of the patients. A phase I study of the efficacy of oncolytic herpes viruses, G207, OncoVEX GM-CSF, and 1716 against a variety of tumors has been completed, and G207 is in phase II trials for use against brain tumors. In addition, a phase I trial using the herpesvirus showed good tolerance at all dosages. We discuss the basic scientific principles and current results of the above clinical trials with respect to these oncolytic viruses, and then compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of adenoviruses and herpesviruses as oncolytic agents. We also review the published literature on newly developed oncolytic viruses. The concept of oncolytic therapy has been studied for a century. Recent technological developments have made these oncolytic viruses more tumor-specific by exploiting the tumor cell environments. In addition, these viruses have been reported to increase the immunosusceptibility of the tumor cells, and have been designed to express other genes to increase the susceptibility of tumor cells to other therapeutic agents. Oncolytic virus therapy certainly appears to be a feasible treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Analysis of long-term survivors after surgical resection for invasive pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a lethal disease. Although there are many reports on the survival rates of pancreatic cancer patients after surgical resection, the clinicopathological characteristics that influence long-term survival over 5 years remain controversial. Here, we clarify the favourable prognostic factors for long-term survival. One hundred and eighty-two patients with pancreatic cancer underwent surgical resections from 1981 to 1997 in our department. Among them, eight patients survived for at least 5 years after the surgery. The clinicopathological characteristics of the eight long-term survivors who underwent radical resections were studied retrospectively. R0 surgical resections, including five combined with portal vein resections (62.5%), were achieved in these eight patients. Negative invasions of the major regional artery (seven of eight, 87.5%) and to the extrapancreatic nerve plexus (seven of eight, 87.5%), and N0 or Nl lymph node metastasis (7 of 8, 87.5%) were detected as clinicopathological features of long-term survivors in our study. No exposure of carcinoma at the dissected surface and cut end (seven of eight, 87.5%) was characteristically confirmed by pathology. Portal vein invasion was seen in three of the eight patients (37.5%). For long-term survival in cases of pancreatic cancer, complete R0 resections should be performed and negative invasions in the major regional arteries and to the extrapancreatic plexus of the nerve were necessary. No invasion to the portal vein was not necessarily required if R0 was achieved by combined resection of the portal vein.

Extended radical resection versus standard resection for pancreatic cancer: the rationale for extended radical resection

OBJECTIVES

This clinical study was carried out to clarify the indications for extended radical resection for pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

From July 1981 to September 2003, 250 of 391 (63.9%) patients with pancreatic carcinoma underwent tumor resection in our department. Portal vein resection was performed in 171 of these 250 (68.4%) resected cases. The postoperative survival rate was studied using the operative and histologic findings.

RESULTS

Most of the patients who survived for 2 or 3 years were in the carcinoma-free surgical margins group.

CONCLUSION

The most important indication for an extended radical resection combined with portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer is the ability to obtain surgical cancer-free margins. There is no indication for an extended resection in patients in whom the surgical margins will become cancer positive if such an operation is employed.

Clinical significance of intraportal endovascular ultrasonography for the diagnosis of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion by pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The extrapancreatic nerve plexus (PL) invasion is a common feature of pancreatic cancer and affects the outcome of the patients after surgical resection. IPEUS with high-resolution probes can visualize the PL invasion with high overall accuracy rate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of the PL invasion diagnosed intraoperatively by intraportal endovascular ultrasonography (IPEUS).

METHODS

IPEUS was performed in 64 patients who underwent the pancreatic resection. Several clinicopathological factors were studied in patients with or without PL invasion.

RESULTS

There were 18 cases in which PL invasion was confirmed pathologically. IPEUS showed 94% sensitivity, 98% specificity and 97% accuracy for the diagnosis of the PL invasion with the false-positive rate of 5.6%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival in 18 patients with PL invasion was 30, 6 and 0% in comparison to 52, 32 and 18% in those 46 patients without PL invasion and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.008). A significant correlation was found between PL invasion and the portal vein invasion, invasion of the margins or pTNM stage.

CONCLUSIONS

According to current results, the prognosis of the cases with PL invasion is very poor and indication for resection is doubtful. We conclude that the cases in which PL invasion is diagnosed by IPEUS are not indicated for extended resection and correct diagnosis of PL invasion is important not only to predict the outcome but also to decide the surgical procedure for obtaining negative margins while improving the quality of life after surgery.

Intracaval endovascular ultrasonography for large adrenal and retroperitoneal tumors

BACKGROUND

An accurate diagnosis of inferior vena cava (IVC) invasion is important in deciding the surgical strategy for a large adrenal tumor. We investigated the diagnostic value of intracaval endovascular ultrasonography (ICEUS) for invasion of the IVC by a large adrenal tumor.

METHODS

Nine of 163 patients with adrenal and retroperitoneal tumors underwent ICEUS between 1993 and 2002. Intravascular ultrasonography was performed through the right femoral vein with the use of an 8Fr, 20-MHz transducer. The diagnostic criterion for detecting IVC invasion with ICEUS was identification of destruction of a single echogenic layer of the IVC wall or identification of an intracaval tumor mass. The ICEUS finding was confirmed by pathologic examination.

RESULTS

The mean diameter of the tumors in 9 patients undergoing ICEUS and resection was 12.6 cm (range, 8.6-16 cm). Pathologic diagnosis varied: adrenocortical carcinoma, 4; malignant pheochromocytoma, 1; leiomyosarcoma, 1; metastatic lung cancer, 1; paraganglioma, 1; and neurilemmoma, 1. Vascular invasion was identified in 2 patients by ICEUS and confirmed by examination of resected specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of ICEUS for the diagnosis of the IVC invasion were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. However, these values for computed tomography were 100%, 14%, and 25%, respectively; and for cavography, 100%, 57%, and 40%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ICEUS provides confirmatory information regarding tumor invasion of the IVC. This modality also can assist in formulating an operative strategy for large adrenal or retroperitoneal tumors.

Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

To better determine the role of portal vein resection and its effect on survival, as well as to appreciate the impact of portal vein invasion on prognosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Hepatectomy with portal vein resection is sometimes performed for locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the significance of microscopic invasion of the portal vein has not been determined.

METHODS

Medical records of 160 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent macroscopically curative hepatectomy with (n = 52) or without portal vein resection (n = 108) were reviewed. Invasion of the portal vein was assessed histologically on the surgical specimen, and results were correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival.

RESULTS

Surgical mortality, including all hospital deaths, was similar in patients who did and did not undergo portal vein resection (9.6% vs. 9.3%), but the primary tumor was more advanced in patients who underwent portal vein resection. Histologically, no invasion was found in 16 (30.8%) of resected portal veins. However, dense fibrosis adjacent to the portal vein was common, and the mean distance between the leading edge of cancer cells and the adventitia of the portal vein was 437 +/- 431 mum. The prognosis was worse in patients with than without portal vein resection (5-year survival, 9.9% vs. 36.8%; P < 0.0001). The presence or absence of microscopic invasion of the resected portal vein did not influence survival (16.6 months in patients with microscopic invasion vs. 19.4 months in those without; P = 0.1506). Multivariate analysis identified histologic differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and macroscopic portal vein invasion as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic invasion of the portal vein may be misdiagnosed clinically in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, the distance between tumor and adventitia is so narrow that curative resection without portal vein resection is unlikely to be possible. Gross portal vein invasion has a negative impact on survival, and hepatectomy with portal vein resection can offer long-term survival in some patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Laparoscopic staging and subsequent palliation in patients with peripancreatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that laparoscopic staging improves outcome in patients with peripancreatic carcinoma compared to standard radiology staging.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Diagnostic laparoscopy of peripancreatic malignancies has been reported to improve assessment of tumor stage and to prevent unnecessary exploratory laparotomies in 10% to 76% of patients.

METHODS

Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound were performed in 297 consecutive patients with peripancreatic carcinoma scheduled for surgery after radiologic staging. Patients with pathology-proven unresectable tumors were randomly allocated to either surgical or endoscopic palliation. All others underwent laparotomy.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic staging detected biopsy-proven unresectable disease in 39 patients (13%). At laparotomy, unresectable disease was found in another 72 patients, leading to a detection rate for laparoscopic staging of 35%. In total, 145 of the 197 patients classified as having "possibly resectable" disease after laparoscopic staging underwent resection (74%). Average survival in the group of 14 patients with biopsy-proven unresectable tumors randomly allocated to endoscopic palliation was 116 days, with a mean hospital-free survival of 94 days. The corresponding figures were 192 days and 164 days in the 13 patients allocated to surgical palliation.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the limited detection rate for unresectable metastatic disease and the likely absence of a large gain after switching from surgical to endoscopic palliation, laparoscopic staging should not be performed routinely in patients with peripancreatic carcinoma.

Percutaneous transhepatic portography with intravascular ultrasonography for evaluation of venous involvement of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and utility of percutaneous transhepatic portography (PTP) with intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) for preoperative evaluation of major spleno-mesenteric-portal venous invasion by tumors of the pancreas, porta hepatis, or liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a 2-year prospective observational study including 15 consecutive patients (five men, 10 women; mean age, 63.3 y +/- 10.2) with tumors of the pancreas (n = 8), liver (n = 3), or porta hepatis (n = 4) who underwent PTP/IVUS after computed tomography indicated possible tumor invasion into a major portal radical. Transhepatic portal access was created under fluoroscopic guidance with an 8-F vascular sheath and IVUS was performed with an 8-F, 10-MHz system. When appropriate, operative exploration was performed (nine of 15) and findings were correlated with imaging data from PTP/IVUS.

RESULTS

PTP/IVUS was performed successfully in all patients and good visualization of the major portal radicals was achieved. There were no complications from PTP/IVUS, which was performed as an outpatient procedure in most (n = 14) patients. PTP/IVUS provided precise anatomic data regarding the longitudinal and circumferential extent of major portal venous invasion by these tumors. There was excellent correlation between PTP/IVUS and operative findings.

CONCLUSIONS

PTP/IVUS can be performed safely in a preoperative outpatient setting and accurately defines the extent of major portal venous invasion by tumors of the pancreas, porta hepatis, and liver.

Multidisciplinary considerations for patients with cancer of the pancreas or biliary tract

The past century has been nearly all of the growth in knowledge about the anatomy and pathophysiology associated with cancers of the pancreas and surrounding biliary structures. Through advances in imaging technology, endoscopic practice, improvement in surgical technique and perioperative care, anesthesia advances, and a better appreciation for the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, physicians can offer patients some hope for long-term survival and a better quality of life when they are faced with these devastating tumors. Although surgical intervention is the "last best hope" for these patients, advances in the nonoperative disciplines will be required for substantial further improvement in patient outcomes.

Value of percutaneous transhepatic portography before hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic value of percutaneous transhepatic portography (PTP) for assessing cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma has not been studied previously.

METHODS

From April 1977 to March 1998 combined hepatobiliary and portal vein resection was performed in 45 patients. In 25 patients, PTP was carried out before operation and the resected portal bifurcation was examined histologically. Correlation between portographic and microscopic findings at the portal bifurcation was studied retrospectively.

RESULTS

Portographic and microscopic findings were classified into three groups (type A, B or C, and grade 0, I or II respectively) according to the findings at the portal bifurcation. There was a significant correlation between the portographic type and degree of cancer invasion (P = 0.0001). In seven of the eight patients with type A portograms, there was no microscopic cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation. In 15 of the 17 patients with type B or C portograms, cancer invasion was found microscopically. All patients with microscopic grade II invasion had type C portograms.

CONCLUSION

PTP can be used to evaluate cancer invasion of the portal bifurcation with sufficient reliability for preoperative staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Problems in pancreatic cancer surgery

Despite the development of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, it remains difficult to detect pancreatic carcinoma in the early stage. However, the resection rate has been increasing due to recent advances in surgical techniques and the application of extensive surgery. In 1995, statistics of the Pancreatic Cancer Register Committee of Japan Pancreas Society showed a 44.5% rate of resection. Further, according to Japan Pancreas Society staging, the 5-year survival rate of Stage I, II, III, and IV after surgical resection was 46.3, 27.5, 20.4, and 8.3%, respectively. This paper will review the Japanese experience of pancreatic carcinoma and several problems in pancreatic cancer surgery.

Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography for pancreatic cancer

Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography (IPEUS) is a new diagnostic procedure for pancreatic cancer. In portal invasion, subtle invasion and compression are difficult to differentiate with conventional imaging techniques such as computed tomography and angiography. IPEUS is performed with an 8-French, 20-MHz intravascular ultrasound catheter. IPEUS provides high-resolution, real-time images perpendicular to the portal vein axis. With IPEUS, the portal vein wall is visualized as an echogenic band. A subtle portal invasion can be detected by observing this portal vein wall. Moreover, the segment II of the extrapancreatic nerve plexus is visualized as an echogenic area around the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). The extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion can be diagnosed as low echoic infiltration of the area around the IPDA. In the diagnosis of portal vein and extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion, IPEUS provides a good diagnostic value and important information for the staging of local extension of the pancreatic cancer.

[Evaluation of pancreatic cancer by combined laparoscopy and echolaparoscopy]

STUDY AIM

This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the efficiency of staging laparoscopy associated with laparoscopic ultrasonography in the assessment of tumoural extension and surgical resectability in patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 1995 to March 1997, 26 consecutive patients (11 male and 15 female patients), with a mean age of 62.5 years, were included in this study. The lesion was located in the pancreatic head with jaundice. Four staging methods were used: percutaneous ultrasonography (n = 26) computed tomography (n = 26), endoscopic ultrasonography (n = 26). The assessment of resectability by each procedure was verified by surgical exploration and histologic examination.

RESULTS

Results of percutaneous ultrasonography and computed tomography were similar, predicting unresectability in 50% of the patients. Endoscopic ultrasonography performed in the 16 patients without visible metastases according to the previous procedures predicted surgical resectability in seven patients only. With staging laparoscopy associated with laparoscopic ultrasonography, undiscovered metastases were found and unresectability was predicted in 21 patients out of 26; the sensitivity was 100% for liver metastases, peritoneal metastases and vascular involvement, 90% for lymph node involvement and 88% for diagnosis of the primitive lesion. A Whipple procedure was performed in five patients and a palliative bypass in all the other patients except one. An unnecessary laparotomy was avoided in 12 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging laparoscopy associated with laparoscopic ultrasonography is superior to all other staging methods. It should be the first step of a potentially curative surgical treatment (five cases only in this series) or of a palliative bypass. Laparotomy was avoided in 12 cases.

Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography for assessment of vascular invasion by biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of intraportal endovascular ultrasonography (IPEUS) in assessing vascular invasion by biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

A prospective study of 31 consecutive patients with biliary tract cancer was performed. All patients underwent surgery. The sonographic criterion for right hepatic artery invasion was interruption of the hyperechoic layer or encasement by tumor. The sonographic criterion for portal vein invasion was obliteration of the echogenic band of the portal vein. IPEUS findings were confirmed by surgical exploration and pathologic examination of resected specimens.

RESULTS

Right hepatic artery invasion was confirmed in resected specimens in seven patients and by operative findings in four patients. Portal vein invasion was confirmed in resected specimens in six patients and by operative findings in five patients. For diagnosis of right hepatic artery invasion, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IPEUS were all 100%; respective values were 63.6%, 84.2%, and 76.7% for angiography. For diagnosis of portal vein invasion, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IPEUS were 100%, 95%, and 96.8%, respectively. The corresponding values were 63.6%, 89.5%, and 80% for portography and 54.5%, 85%, and 74.2%, respectively, for CT.

CONCLUSION

IPEUS will improve the assessment of vascular invasion at the hepatic hilum by biliary tract cancer.

Biliary malignancies

Biliary malignancies, including cancers of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, gallbladder and ampulla, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with obstructive jaundice. Cancers of the intrahepatic bile ducts and ampulla are managed as liver and peri-ampullary tumours respectively. Extrahepatic bile duct cancers are diagnosed by cholangiography and evaluated for resectability by imaging and angiography. Vascular infiltration is the main contra-indication for resection, which may also involve the liver. Every attempt must be made to achieve curative resection, but local resection may be justified even if non-curative. Gallbladder cancers are usually advanced at the time of diagnosis and are unresectable--surgical palliation improves the quality of life by relieving biliary and gastric outlet obstruction. Long-term survival is possible after curative resection in early lesions that are usually diagnosed as an incidental finding after cholecystectomy for presumed gallstone disease. The role of adjuvant therapy in biliary malignancies needs further evaluation.

Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography: optimizing resectability in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Open laparotomy has traditionally been required to stage hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) cancers accurately. For unresectable patients, costs and morbidity have been high. Today, laparoscopy alone or combined with laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) is being examined for its value in defining the extent of malignancy.

STUDY DESIGN

We have analyzed the effect of routine implementation of this new staging technique in our HBP center. Staging laparoscopy (SL) with LUS was performed in 50 consecutive patients with HBP malignancies. All patients were considered to have resectable tumors as determined by traditional preoperative staging modalities. Primary tumors were located in the liver (n = 7), biliary tract (n = 11), or pancreas (n = 32). An average of 2.7 preoperative studies per patient were performed prior to SL-LUS.

RESULTS

Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography predicted resectable tumors in 28 patients (56%). At laparotomy, 26 of 28 were actually resectable: the false-negative rate was 4%. Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography indicated unresectability in 22 patients (44%). Staging laparoscopy alone demonstrated previously unrecognized occult metastases in 11 patients (22%). In 11 other patients (22%) in whom SL alone was negative, LUS established unresectability from vascular invasion (n = 5), lymph node metastases (n = 5), or intraparenchymal hepatic tumor (n = 1). All cases of unresectability due to vascular invasion were validated by laparotomy. Five of six lymph node or hepatic metastases were proved histologically by LUS-guided needle biopsy rather than laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Unnecessary laparotomy can be safely avoided by SL-LUS in many patients with HPB malignancies, reducing costs and morbidity.

Intracaval endovascular ultrasonography for malignant hepatic tumor: new diagnostic technique for vascular invasion

Successful operation for hepatic tumor extending to the inferior vena cava (IVC) depends heavily on accurate preoperative imaging. We investigate the diagnostic value of intracaval endovascular ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of invasion to the IVC. A retrospective study of 26 consecutive patients of hepatic tumor with possible invasion of the IVC was performed using conventional imaging techniques from the right femoral vein with an 8-French, 20-MHz intravascular US. Nineteen of 26 cases were operated on and 15 cases were resected, including three cases of combined resection of the IVC. The sonographic criterion for IVC invasion was obliteration of a single echogenic layer of the IVC wall or intracaval tumor mass. The results of intracaval endovascular US were compared with those of CT and cavography. Vascular invasion was obtained in seven of 26 cases. Vascular invasion was confirmed by pathologic examination of five resected specimens, including two autopsy and two operative findings. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of intracaval endovascular US for the diagnosis of the IVC invasion were 100%, 94.7%, and 96.1%, respectively. The values were 85.7%, 63.2%, and 69.2% for CT and 71.4%, 68.4%, and 69.2% for cavography, respectively. The intracaval endovascular US clearly visualized the IVC and established the presence and extent of tumor invasion. Intracaval endovascular US is a useful technique that can precisely evaluate the IVC for possible hepatic tumor invasion, especially when presence or extent of vascular invasion is not definitely established by conventional imaging techniques.