Aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Risk factors and long-term results

Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Background

Our objective was to report on the prospective outcomes in the areas of depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty in SAVR and TAVR patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve intervention.

Methods

We recruited 300 patients across 3 groups (TAVR, SAVR, and CABG) over 12 months. Depression, quality of life, frailty, and angina were assessed followed by propensity score matching.

Results

Using logistical regression when all patient factors considered for all patients who had SAVR and TAVR, the only preoperative factors that impacted on 1 year mortality was hypertension and STS score. Quality of life improvements within each group over 12 months was significant (p value = 0.0001). Depression at 12 months between groups (p value = 0.0395) and within each group was significant (p value = 0.0073 for SAVR and 0.0001 for TAVR). Angina was most frequent in TAVR at 12 months in the QL (p = 0.0001), PL (p = 0.0007), and improvement was significant in the QL (SAVR p = 0.0010, TAVR p = 0.0001) and PL (SAVR p = 0.0002), TAVR p = 0.0007) domains in both groups. Frailty at 12 months improved in both groups, but was greatest in TAVR (p value = 0.00126).

Conclusions

This 12 months follow up of cardiac surgical patients has revealed significant improvement in PROMs and frailty in all groups by 3 months postoperative regardless of surgical or transcatheter approach. Outcome measures of quality of life and frailty could be utilized as a measure of outcome more regularly in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery regardless of approach.

Evaluating treatment-specific post-discharge quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness of TAVR and SAVR: Current practice & future directions

•

Post-TAVR HRQOL shows more rapid short-term improvement than SAVR within trials.

•

Higher TAVR use requires better real-world TAVR/SAVR cost-effectiveness comparisons.

•

Wearable devices should be used in real-world settings to compare TAVR/SAVR HRQOL.

Background

Aortic stenosis is a prevalent valvular heart disease that is treated primarily by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which are common treatments for addressing symptoms secondary to valvular heart disease. This narrative review article focuses on the existing literature comparing recovery and cost-effectiveness for SAVR and TAVR.

Methods

Major databases were searched for relevant literature discussing HRQOL and cost-effectiveness of TAVR and SAVR. We also searched for studies analyzing the use of wearable devices to monitor post-discharge recovery patterns.

Results

The literature focusing on quality-of-life following TAVR and SAVR has been limited primarily to single-center observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Studies focused on TAVR report consistent and rapid improvement relative to baseline status. Common HRQOL instruments (SF-36, EQ-5D, KCCQ, MLHFQ) have been used to document that TF-TAVR is advantageous over SAVR at 1-month follow-up, with the benefits leveling off following 1 year. TF-TAVR is economically favorable relative to SAVR, with estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values ranging from $50,000 to $63,000/QALY gained. TA-TAVR has not been reported to be advantageous from an HRQOL or cost-effectiveness perspective.

Conclusions

While real-world experiences are less described, large-scale trials have advanced our understanding of recovery and cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement treatment strategies. Future work should focus on scalable wearable device technology, such as smartwatches and heart-rate monitors, to facilitate real-world evaluation of TAVR and SAVR to support clinical decision-making and outcomes ascertainment.

Aortic valve replacement in small patients

OBJECTIVES

Asians are smaller than Europeans and North Americans, but aortic valve replacement (AVR) in small patients has not been examined. We aimed to compare short- and mid-term outcomes of AVR between small and non-small patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively divided 173 patients who underwent AVR into small (S, n = 95) and non-small (NS, n = 78) groups according to body surface area (≤1.6 in men, ≤1.5 in women) and analyzed differences in baseline characteristics, procedural and post-procedural variables, and survival.

RESULTS

Mean age differed significantly between the S and NS groups (71.9 ± 11.2 vs. 66.2 ± 9.8 years), as did the proportion of women (60.0% vs. 24.4%). Implanted valves (19.6 ± 1.6 mm vs. 20.7 ± 1.7 mm) were significantly smaller and more bioprosthetic valves (57.9% vs. 41.0%) were used in the S group. Effective orifice area index and the rate of moderate and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch were not significantly different. No significant intergroup differences were found in hospitalization duration, 30-day mortality, survival rates, or valve related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Small patients were older and the proportion of women was higher. The implanted aortic valves were smaller and more were biological prostheses. However, mortality rate did not differ and short- and mid-term outcomes were safe and favorable.

Endovascular resection of the native aortic valve before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: state of the art and review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was introduced into clinical practice in 2002 as a rescue approach in patients presenting with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis but not eligible for conventional aortic valve replacement. This technique allows implantation of a balloon expandable bioprosthesis without resection of the native aortic valve. Several complications are described as a consequence of the residual highly calcified valve being squeezed against the aortic wall by the stent of the implant. This can result in deformation of the metal stent and paravalvular leakage, risk of occlusion of the coronary ostia, or central and peripheral embolization of valvular debris. To avoid these complications, many authors suggest the possibility to resect and remove the native aortic valve before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In this field, different authors have described possible techniques and different sources of energy to resect the calcified valve. In this article, we review the development of these experimental techniques and discuss future prospects in this field.

Validity of standard gamble utilities in patients referred for aortic valve replacement

PURPOSE

Standard gamble (SG) is the preferred method of assessing preferences in situations with uncertainty and risk, which makes it relevant to patients considered for aortic valve replacement (AVR). The present study assesses SG preferences in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

All patients >18 years old with severe AS referred for AVR to our institution were invited to enroll in the study. The SG was administered by a clinical research nurse. The SF-36, EQ-5D 3L, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and AS symptoms were administered by self-completed questionnaire. We hypothesized that SG utilities would have low-to-moderate correlations with physical and mental aspects of health based on our pathophysiological understanding of severe AS. No correlations were expected with echocardiographic measures of the aortic valve.

RESULTS

The response rate for SG was 98 %. SG moderately correlated with physical aspects of SF-36 (PCS, role-physical, vitality), health transition, AS symptoms, and EQ-VAS (ρ S = 0.31-0.39, p < 0.001) and had low correlation with mental aspects of SF-36 and EQ-5D (ρ S = 0.17-0.28, p < 0.001). No correlation was found between SG and HADS, echocardiographic measures, age, gender, or education level (ρ S = 0.01-0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

SG is an acceptable and feasible method of assessing preferences in patients with severe AS that has evidence for validity. The inclusion of uncertainty lends the SG face validity in this population as a direct approach to assessing preferences and basis for QALY calculations.

A case of severe aortic valve stenosis including triple-vessel ischemic heart disease in which multidisciplinary percutaneous coronary intervention and balloon aortic valvuloplasty relieved low cardiac output syndrome

The patient was an 80-year-old man with low cardiac output syndrome associated with triple-vessel ischemic heart disease and severe aortic stenosis (AS). Deeming the patient unprepared for surgery because of his deteriorated general condition, we decided to perform revascularization with a percutaneous coronary intervention associated with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and treat the severe AS with percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Complete revascularization was successfully achieved and BAV was performed, improving the aortic valve area from 0.58 to 0.92 cm(2) and the pressure gradient from 41 to 26 mmHg. Postoperative hemodynamics improved, and the IABP was successfully removed.

Demographics of severe valvular aortic stenosis in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of aortic valve stenosis (AS) is seeing renewed interest mainly due to the availability of transcatheter therapies. However, the number of epidemiological studies of this disease in Singapore is limited. We aimed to describe the aetiology and clinical presentation of AS in Singapore, as well as patients' attitudes toward it. Our findings may facilitate the future planning and utilisation of resources to better manage these patients.

METHODS

249 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (from April 1999 to April 2008) and diagnosed with severe AS were assessed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and patients' decisions on surgery were determined.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 71 (range 23-98) years. 50.2% of patients were male. The commonest presenting symptom was dyspnoea, and 40 (16.0%) patients had coexistent atrial fibrillation. The aetiology of AS was degenerative in 216 (86.7%), rheumatic in 11 (4.4%) and related to a bicuspid valve in 22 (8.9%) patients. The average peak velocity across the aortic valve was 4.2 ± 0.8 m/s and the mean aortic valve area was 0.76 ± 0.13 cm2. The overall mean logistic EuroSCORE was 10.7 ± 12.3. 105 (42.2%) patients who were offered surgery refused. 87 (35%) deaths were seen during the follow-up period (mean duration 14.5 months), which also saw 68 (27%) patients undergo surgery and 86 (34%) patients hospitalised for heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Degenerative AS was the commonest aetiology in this contemporary cohort of patients. Despite the known benefits of surgery, the refusal rate for surgery remained high.

Pulmonary function tests overestimate chronic pulmonary disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary dysfunction is an important risk factor for postoperative complications after cardiac surgery, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered a relative contraindication to aortic valve replacement. Pulmonary function tests may mistakenly diagnose patients as having COPD, when in fact they have pulmonary dysfunction due to heart failure that potentially will improve with valve replacement.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and July 2011, 214 consecutive patients underwent pulmonary function testing as part of their preoperative screening. Based on the testing, 143 patients were identified as having COPD (52 mild, 42 moderate, and 49 severe), according to The Society of Thoracic Surgery definition. A total of 71 patients had follow-up tests performed at 6 to 12 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

A recent smoking history was present in 55 of 214 (25.7%) patients. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 13.6% (29 of 214) of patients by a conventional surgical approach, in 39.3% (84 of 214) by a transfemoral approach, and in 47.2% (101 of 214) by a transapical approach. Mortality was not significantly different in patients with COPD (12 of 71, 16.9%) compared with patients without COPD (37 of 143, 25.9%), p = 0.141. Logistic regression analyses failed to identify preoperative COPD severity category (p = 0.332) as a predictor for mortality. Comparison of pre- and postprocedure tests revealed that 42% (30 of 71) of patients with COPD showed improvement of one COPD severity category or more, including 40% (12 of 30) of patients in the mild group, 43% (9 of 21) of patients in the moderate group, and 45% (9 of 20) of patients in the severe category.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal pulmonary function improves in a significant number of patients with severe aortic stenosis after valve replacement.

Critical review of health-related quality of life studies of patients with aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

While studies of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are increasing among cardiovascular patients, very few have examined HRQOL in persons with aortic stenosis (AS).

PURPOSE

A critical review of studies (1997-2008) of HRQOL in persons with AS was conducted to summarize findings and identify clinical and research implications.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were identified, all of which were quantitative and evaluated HRQOL after aortic valve replacement (AVR). No studies conducted by nurses or studies measuring HRQOL in persons who did not undergo AVR were found. The literature focused on age and type of valve as variables influencing HRQOL postoperatively. Although results varied, elderly patients often scored similar or better than comparison groups. Health-related quality of life was found to be affected by valve noise and anticoagulation rather than the specific valve type when comparing patients receiving biological versus mechanical valves.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection for surgery should not be based on age alone. Early consideration should be given to symptoms prior to surgery because of evidence that patients with fewer symptoms preoperatively have better HRQOL after AVR. Anticoagulation status should be evaluated as an independent variable of HRQOL in future studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Researchers need to augment generic HRQOL measures with disease-specific items that may pertain to life areas affected by AS, such as audible valve click, wound healing, and dyspnea. Future research should be inclusive of AS patients who do not undergo surgery. Nurses in a variety of roles can work independently or within a multidisciplinary team to provide interventions for the promotion of HRQOL for patients across all stages of the AS disease process.

Aortic stenosis

In developed countries, aortic stenosis is the most prevalent of all valvular heart diseases. A manifestation of ageing, the disorder is becoming more frequent as the average age of the population increases. Symptomatic severe disease is universally fatal if left untreated yet is consistent with a typical lifespan when mechanical relief of the stenosis is provided in a timely fashion. Management of mild disease, severe asymptomatic disease, and far advanced disease, and the effect of new percutaneous treatments, provide both controversy and exciting promise to care of patients with aortic stenosis. We discuss these issues in this Review.

High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted?

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) trials are ongoing in patients with an elevated European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCOREs), patients believed to have high mortality rates and poor long-term prognoses with valve replacement surgery. It is, however, uncertain that the EuroSCORE model is well calibrated for such high-risk AVR patients. We evaluated EuroSCORE prediction vs a single institution's surgical results in this target population.

METHODS

From January 1996 through March 2006, 731 patients with EuroSCOREs of 7 or higher underwent isolated AVR. In this cohort, 313 (42.8%) were septuagenarians, 322 (44.0%) were octogenarians or nonagenarians, 233 (31.9%) had had previous cardiac procedures, 237 (32.4%) had atheromatous aortas, and 127 (17.4%) had cerebrovascular disease. A minimally invasive approach was used in 469 (64.2%). Data collection was prospective. Long-term survival was computed from the Social Security Death Benefit Index.

RESULTS

The mean EuroSCORE was 9.7 (median, 10), and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 17.2%. Actual hospital mortality was 7.8% (57 of 731). Multivariate analysis showed ejection fraction of less than 0.30 (p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR], 3.13), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.019; OR, 2.14), and peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.048; OR, 2.13) were significant predictors of hospital mortality. Complication(s) occurred in 73 patients (9.9%). Freedom from all-cause death (including hospital mortality) was 72.4% at 5 years (n = 152). Age (p < 0.001), previous cardiac operations (p < 0.014; OR, 1.51), renal failure (p < 0.002; OR, 2.37), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.007; OR, 1.30) were predictors of worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Logistic EuroSCORE greatly overpredicts mortality in these patients. Five-year survival is good, unlike suggestions from earlier EuroSCORE analyses. This raises concern about unknown long-term percutaneous prosthesis function. Clinical trials for these patients must include randomized surgical controls and have long-term end points.

Predictors of mortality after aortic valve replacement

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended as a standard surgical procedure for aortic valve disease. Still the evidence for commonly claimed predictors of post-AVR prognosis, in particular mortality, appears scant. This systematic review reports on the evidence for predictors of post-AVR mortality, and may be helpful in pre-surgical risk-stratification. In PubMed, we searched for original reports of post-AVR follow-up studies. We assessed the quality of study design and methods with a standardized checklist. Data of the reported predictors of mortality and outcomes were extracted. Twenty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies were considered of high quality. There is strong evidence that the risk of early mortality is increased by emergency surgery, while the risk of late mortality is increased with older age and preoperative atrial fibrillation. There is moderate evidence that the risk of early mortality is increased by older age, aortic insufficiency, coronary artery disease, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF), infective endocarditis, hypertension, mechanical valves, preoperative pacing, dialysis-dependent renal failure and valve size; and that the risk for late mortality is increased by emergency surgery and urgency of the operation. There is little evidence for high New York Heart Association class, concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and many other commonly claimed risk factors for post-AVR mortality. The reported evidence on predictors of post-AVR mortality will help for pre-surgical risk-stratification, i.e. to discern patients at high or low risk for early and late post-AVR mortality. Future prognostic studies should take the evidence from this review into account and should focus on derivation of a predictive model for post-AVR survival.

Aortic valve surgery in octogenarians: predictive factors for operative and long-term results

OBJECTIVE

To assess factors influencing operative and long-term outcome in octogenarians undergoing aortic valve surgery (AVR).

METHODS

Records of 220 consecutive octogenarians having AVR between 1992 and 2004 were reviewed, and follow-up obtained (99% complete). Of the group (mean age: 82.8 years; 174 females), 142 patients (65%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, 22 (10%) had previous myocardial infarction, 11 (5%) had previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and 8 (4%) had percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. There were 44 urgent procedures (20%), and additional CABG was performed in 58 patients (26%).

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 13% (9% for AVR, 24% for AVR+CABG). Among the 29 patients who died, 14 (48%) were operated on urgently (32% mortality for urgent procedures). Causes of hospital death were respiratory insufficiency or infection in 16 patients (16/29=55%), myocardial infarction in 8 (28%), stroke in 2 (7%), sepsis in 2 (7%), and renal failure in 1 (3%). Significant postoperative complications were atrial fibrillation in 48 patients (22%), respiratory insufficiency in 46 (21%), permanent atrio-ventricular bloc in 12 (5%), myocardial infarction in 10 (5%), hemodialysis in 4 (2%), and stroke in 4 (2%). Mean hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays were 17.6+/-5.2 and 6.9+/-3.4 days, respectively. Multivariate predictors (p<0.05) of hospital death were urgent procedure, associated CABG, NYHA class IV, and percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. Age, associated CABG, and urgent procedure were predictors of prolonged ICU stay. Mean follow-up was 58.2 months and actuarial 5-year survival was 73.2+/-6.9%. Age, preoperative myocardial infarction, urgent procedure, and duration of ICU stay were independent predictors of late death. Among 130 patients alive at follow-up, 91% were angina free and 81% in class I-II.

CONCLUSIONS

AVR in octogenarians can be performed with acceptable mortality, although significant morbidity. These results stress the importance of early operation on elderly patients with aortic valve disease, avoiding urgent procedures. Associated coronary artery disease is a harbinger of poor operative outcome. Long-term survival and functional recovery are excellent.

Outcome of heart surgery procedures in octogenarians: is age really not an issue?

Survival rates are a well-known marker for quality performance of a cardiac surgery department, as well as standard of procedures, freedom of reoperation, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, improvement in New York Heart Association classification and quality of life after surgery. Until recently there has not been any great interest of surgeons in topics concerning the costs of postoperative care, as long as the results were successful. However, satisfactory results after cardiac surgery in aged people require successful procedures, as well as meticulous perioperative care. The expenses of healthcare are constantly growing and approaches to optimize costs in all departments of medicine have a high priority. Exact evaluation of comorbidities and prevention of complications in aged people, as well as attentive strategies concerning expenses, may help to reduce mortality, postoperative complications and costs.

Cirugía cardíaca en el anciano: nuevas perspectivas para una población en crecimiento

Improvement in socioeconomic and sanitary conditions during last 2 decades has lead to 4 year-life expectancy increasing in Spanish population. Increasing in age-related cardiovascular pathologies makes more necessary cardiac surgery in the elderly. Analysis of current characteristics of elderly population, cardiac surgery indications in this group, as well as morbimortality published results and future expectations, constitute the topic of this review.

Treatment and outcomes of severe cardiac disease with surgical indication in very old patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare the crude and risk-adjusted survival of a series of octogenarians with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (SAS) or severe coronary artery disease (SCAD).

METHODS

We reviewed the treatment and outcomes of 130 consecutive patients > or = 80 years old hospitalized for SAS or SCAD.

RESULTS

Mean age was 82.8+/-3.1 years, 52% were women. Of 83 patients with SCAD, 52 were treated by coronary stenting (63%), 12 by coronary artery bypass grafting (15%) and 19 medically (23%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among different treatment groups. When comparing the medically treated group with the intervention group (coronary artery bypass grafting or stenting), the former showed a trend to a worse prognosis (adjusted HR 2.5, 95% CI 0.98-6.6, p=0.056). Of 47 patients treated with SAS, 33 were treated surgically (70%), 26 by aortic valve replacement (AVR) alone and 7 combined with coronary revascularization. Fourteen patients were treated medically (30%). Patients treated with AVR were younger, presented less frequently a previous MI and had better left ventricular systolic function. Multivariate analysis did not find AVR associated to a better survival (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.2-5.4).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac surgery in octogenarians is more frequently performed in patients with SAS than in patients with SCAD, but survival benefit is probably greater in the latter. A more conservative approach with medical therapy in patients with SAS and coronary stenting in patients with SCAD are alternatives that should be considered.

Cardiac surgery in the elderly: indications and management options to optimize outcomes

The elderly have increasingly benefited from the advances in cardiac surgical techniques and perioperative care. Compared to the same procedures in younger patients their operations can be more technically demanding and their level of reserve leaves less margin should complications occur. The importance of using realistic indications for operations with a focus on improving the quality of their lives and of optimal preoperative preparation of patients is emphasized.

Aortic valve replacement and concomitant mitral valve regurgitation in the elderly: impact on survival and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

The impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) on elderly patients (> or = 70 years) undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not clearly defined. This study investigates the long-term effects of preoperative, moderate MR on survival and functional outcome in elderly AVR patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective review identified 408 consecutive elderly patients who underwent isolated AVR from January 1983 to February 2004. The pathologic etiology of MR was determined on preoperative echocardiogram, and patients were stratified into no/mild MR (Group I; n = 338) versus moderate MR (Group II; n = 70). Follow-up was 95.1% complete. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Short Form-12 questionnaire. On univariate analysis, Groups I and II differed in incidence of previous myocardial infarction (13.9% versus 28.6%; P = 0.004), hyperlipidemia (18.7% versus 33.3%; P = 0.009), and congestive heart failure (50.0% versus 70.0%; P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, moderate MR was an independent risk factor impacting long-term survival (P = 0.04). Actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 10 years for Group I was 93.8%, 73.3%, and 40.1% versus 92.3%, 58.2%, and 14.6% for Group II (P = 0.04). Available postoperative echocardiograms for Group II (n = 37) demonstrated improvement in MR in 81.8% of functional MR patients. However, MR persisted or worsened in 65.4% of patients with intrinsic mitral valve disease (myxomatous, calcific, or ischemic MR). Functional outcomes showed 77% of Group I versus 78.6% of Group II rated their health as good to excellent post-AVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate MR is an independent risk factor impacting long-term survival in elderly patients undergoing AVR. Therefore, patients with intrinsic mitral valve disease should be considered for concomitant MV surgery.

Aortic valve replacement in patients 70 years and older

BACKGROUND

Aortic valvular disease is the most common valvular lesion among elderly patients. Because of changing demographics, it has become increasingly frequent. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only effective treatment for aortic valvular disease.

HYPOTHESIS

This study was undertaken to evaluate the results of AVR in an elderly population.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively analyzed in 117 consecutive patients (mean age 73.8 years) who underwent AVR between 1991 and 2002.

RESULTS

Pure or predominant severe aortic stenosis was present in 108 patients. Nine patients had severe aortic regurgitation. Before valve replacement, 62.4% of the patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV. A bioprosthesis was implanted in 62.4% of the patients, and 37.6% received a mechanical valve. Concomitant cardiac surgical procedures were performed in 25 patients (coronary artery bypass graft in 22, mitral valve replacement in 3). There were 17 deaths, giving a perioperative mortality rate of 14.5%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that repeat surgery for bleeding, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, postoperative respiratory failure, and postoperative acute renal insufficiency were significant independent predictors of operative mortality. Of the 100 hospital survivors, 78 were followed for a mean of 42.9 months. There were six deaths during follow-up; only two of these were cardiac related. Five-year actuarial survival for all patients and for hospital survivors were 70 and 91.1%, respectively. One year post surgery, all patients were in NYHA functional class I-II.

CONCLUSION

In a selected patient population, AVR in the elderly is associated with acceptable mortality and morbidity. The outlook for hospital operative survivors is excellent with improved quality of life and an expected survival normal for this particular age.

The relevance of health related quality of life in paced patients

With the tremendous advances in cardiac pacing during the past four decades, cardiac pacemaker implantation is now a common clinical procedure. In recent years, the indications for permanent pacemakers have expanded. This increase in reasons for pacing and shift in mode of pacing have been caused by the evolution of pacemaker therapy from a life-saving measure (mortality), to one aimed at improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Until now the efficacy of pacing therapy has predominantly been measured using "objective" criteria. However, in recent years the importance of HRQoL as an outcome measure has increasingly been recognized as patients prefer quality over quantity of life. In this review we describe the development and testing of Aquarel, a new developed HRQoL questionnaire for pacemaker patients, composed of a generic core module with disease specific add-ons. Current and future research to improve the Aquarel questionnaire is also described.

Prognostic significance of postoperative in-hospital complications in elderly patients. I. Long-term survival

To determine the impact of in-hospital postoperative complications on long-term survival, we prospectively studied consecutive patients > or = 70 yr of age undergoing noncardiac surgery. Potential clinical risk factors were measured and evaluated for their association with the occurrence of long-term postoperative mortality. Long-term survival was determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate correlates of survival were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model. The survival of the study group was also compared with the age- and gender-matched general United States population. Five hundred seventeen patients who survived the initial hospitalization were studied. The mean follow-up duration was 28.6 +/- 12.8 mo. One hundred sixty-four of 517 patients (31.7%) were deceased at the time of follow-up. A history of cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-3.38, P < 0.0001), ASA physical status >II (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.61-3.21, P < 0.0001), neurologic disease (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.24, P = 0.008), age (HR 1.42 per decade, 95% CI 1.11-1.81, P = 0.005), postoperative pulmonary complications (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.30-4.48, P = 0.005), and renal complications (HR 6.07, 95% CI 2.23-16.52, P < 0.0001) were significant independent predictors of decreased long-term survival. Compared with the United States population, patients with complications had a greater increase in mortality risk in the first 3 mo after surgery (HR 7.3 versus general population) than those without complications (HR 2.9, P = 0.023). An effort to improve perioperative care delivery to elderly surgical patients must include measures to minimize in-hospital postoperative complications, particularly those involving the pulmonary and renal systems.

Extended follow up after isolated aortic valve replacement in the elderly

The present paper reviews the extended follow up of all patients aged >/=70 who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our institution in the 1980s. Patients were identified from the surgical database and clinical information was gathered. Long-term follow up information was obtained from the patient, their family, or doctor. Ninety-three patients aged >/=70 years (median 73, range 70-80) comprised the study population. The indication for surgery was aortic stenosis in 68 patients (73%). Fifty-two patients (56%) received an allograft valve, 17 (18%) a bioprosthetic valve, and 24 (26%) a mechanical prosthesis. The median hospital stay was 12 days (range 0-105 days). Five surgical deaths occurred. Detailed follow up was obtained for the 71 patients who died later, and the 16 living patients (one patient lost). The median length of follow up was 6.8 years (range 0.1-18.9 years). Patients who received an allograft aortic valve had a significantly better long-term survival (median 10.6, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 8.1-13.8 years) compared to those receiving mechanical or bioprosthetic valves (median 6.5, 95% CI 4.7-11.9 years), P = 0.03. For the entire group, survival was similar to the age- and sex-matched population. Of the 16 patients alive at follow up (mean age 87, range 83-92), most were free of angina (12, 75%) and heart failure (10, 63%). The conclusion from the current study is that isolated aortic valve surgery in the elderly, particularly with an allograft valve, is associated with an excellent long-term outcome. A survival benefit was demonstrated comparing allograft aortic valve replacement to other valve types.

Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with aortic valve replacement in healthy octogenarians does not increase postoperative risk

OBJECTIVE

Critical aortic stenosis with or without coronary artery disease is increasingly common in octogenarians. Surgery is the treatment of choice, but indications and results of aortic valve replacement (AVR), particularly when combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are debated. We investigated whether the combined procedure of AVR and CABG increased postoperative risk compared with isolated AVR in otherwise healthy octogenarians.

DESIGN

In the period 1994-1998, AVR was performed in 94 patients above 80 years, the majority in NYHA class III and IV. Combined AVR and CABG was performed in 52/94 patients. The patients were studied retrospectively by collecting data from hospital records and followed for 0-7 years.

RESULTS

Mean age was 82 +/- 2.3 years, sex (male/female) 33/61, left ventricular ejection fraction 70 +/- 18%, transvalvular peak pressure gradient 63 +/- 20 mmHg and aortic valve area 0.5 +/- 0.2 cm(2). Early mortality (< 30 days) was 4/42 (9.5%) after AVR and 4/52 (7.6%) after AVR and CABG (p = NS between groups). Three-year survival was 33/42 (78.5%) after AVR and 42/52 (80.7%) after AVR and CABG (p = NS between groups).

CONCLUSION

AVR with concomitant CABG in octogenarians with aortic stenosis who are otherwise healthy, may be performed without increased risk.

[Risk of perioperative mortality and complications following biological aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: stented vs unstented bioprotheses]

Recently published studies suggest that the hemodynamic advantage of stentless bioprostheses in comparison to stented bioprostheses positively influence the long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. However, the more complex and time consuming implantation technique may increase the risk of operative death. Between April 1996 and September 2000, 201 patients with the mean age of 75 ± 5 years underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a stentless Medtronic Freestyle Bioprothesis (FP) and 166 patients with a mean age of 77 ± 5 years received a stented Medtronic Mosaic Biopros thesis (MP). Patients requiring concomitant procedures other than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were excluded. The operative mortality was 3.5% after AVR with the FP and 6% after AVR with the MP. Multiple logistic regression analysis considering the different patient populations revealed no increased risk of operative death after AVR with FB (p = 0.46). Previously heart operations (p = 0.046) and emergency operation (p = 0.022) were risk factors for operative death after AVR with the biological bioprostheses. The risk for postoperatively neurological impairment (p = 0.15) and other complications (p = 0.46) was furthermore not increased after implantation of a Freestyle stentless valve. The risk of delayed mobilization (p < 0.001) was 2.4-fold increased for patients after AVR with the Freestyle valve. A positive influence on survival due to the implantation of a stentless Freestyle valve could not be shown within the observed period. However, in spite of the more complex and time-consuming operation technique, the risk of operative death and postoperative complications is not increased after aortic valve replacement with the stentless FB.

Psychometric properties of Aquarel. a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for pacemaker patients

In cardiac pacing current clinical practice permits the use of ventricular or atrioventricular-synchronous pacemakers. However, it is not known which type of pacemaker results in superior clinical and patient outcomes. To date, there is no feasible and validated disease-specific questionnaire for pacemaker patients to assess quality of life (QoL) available. The Aquarel questionnaire was developed as a disease-specific extension to the Short-Form-36 (SF-36). A cross-sectional study was carried out in 74 pacemaker patients to evaluate validity and reliability of this instrument. Items were selected and scales constructed based on factorial analysis. Internal consistency, content validity and test-retest reliability were moderate to excellent. Correlations with the SF-36 scales, pacing mode and functional tests were as hypothesized, demonstrating the individual value and distinctiveness of the Aquarel subscales. The results support the feasibility and usefulness of evaluating QoL in pacemaker patients when using Aquarel as an extension to the SF-36.

Mild renal failure is associated with adverse outcome after cardiac valve surgery

The present study was performed to ascertain whether the presence of mild renal failure (defined as a serum creatinine concentration of 1. 5 to 3.0 mg/dL) is an independent risk factor for adverse outcome after cardiac valve surgery. An extensive set of preoperative and postoperative data was collected in 834 prospectively evaluated patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery at 14 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether an independent association of mild renal dysfunction with adverse outcomes was present. Patients with mild renal failure had significantly greater 30-day mortality rates (P = 0.001; 16% versus 6%) and frequency of postoperative bleeding (P = 0.023; 16% versus 8%), respiratory complications (P = 0.02, 29% versus 16%), and cardiac complications (P = 0.002; 18% versus 7%) than patients with normal renal function (serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL) when controlling for multiple other variables. The presence of a serum creatinine concentration of 1.5 to 3.0 mg/dL is significantly and independently associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac valve surgery.

Quality-of-life of pacemaker patients: a reappraisal of current instruments

Current clinical practice permits the use of single chamber ventricular or dual chamber pacemakers. However, it is not known which type of pacemaker results in superior clinical and patient outcomes. This is of growing importance because of the higher costs and increased risk of technical failures of dual chamber pacemakers. Patient outcomes can be assessed with quality of life questionnaires, but it is unclear which questionnaires are valid for use in pacemaker patients. This article reappraises studies on quality of life instruments for pacemaker patients. We searched MEDLINE (1985-1998) for studies assessing quality-of-life in general and in pacemaker patients. The SF-36 appeared to be the best among generic questionnaires because of its psychometric characteristics and experience of use. Concerning disease specific instruments, the Karolinska quality of life questionnaire has desirable content validity but lacks more rigorous psychometric validation, which constitutes a serious limitation. Previous studies suggested that implantation of atrioventricular pacemakers improves quality-of-life compared to ventricular pacemakers, but since no well-designed and validated questionnaire exists, these results should be interpreted with caution. The best outcome measure to evaluate quality-of-life in pacemaker patients would be a combination of a generic health profile with established reliability and validity supplemented with a cardiovascular assessment adjusted to suit pacemaker patients. By doing so, individual scores can be compared within a disease cohort and to same-aged, nondiseased persons, as well as other diseased populations. The development and validation of such an instrument is currently needed.

Cardiac surgery in octogenarians--The Green Lane Hospital Experience 1995-1998

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients aged 80 years and over are being considered and accepted for cardiac surgery.

AIM

To review the experience of surgery in this elderly group of patients at our institution.

METHODS

Hospital records of octogenarians undergoing surgery between January 1995 and September 1998 were reviewed and follow-up was obtained by general practitioner (GP) and patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent cardiac surgery. The mean age was 82.8+/-1.4 years (range 80.8 to 86.2 years). Twenty-three (62%) were male. All were independent pre-operatively with severe symptoms and minor co-existing morbidity. All operations were urgent except two (emergency). Twenty patients (54%) had isolated coronary surgery, six (16%) aortic valve replacement alone, and 11 (30%) combined surgery. There were four (11%) early deaths and five (14%) peri-operative neurological events. The mean duration of post-operative intensive care stay was 2.4+/-3.9 days (range 0.05 to 16, median 1.0) and post-operative hospital stay 14.0+/-13.9 days (range 0 to 79, median 11). At the time of follow-up (mean duration 20.0+/-11.2 months) two further patients had died (non-cardiac). Twenty-six of the 31 survivors were living at home (23 independently), one with relatives, and four in residential care. Their cardiac symptoms were well controlled. The GPs of all hospital survivors, and all surviving patients themselves, felt that cardiac surgery had been beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac surgery in the very elderly has been reserved for those with severe disease or symptoms and little co-morbidity. Early mortality is higher than for the general population undergoing cardiac surgery, but post-operative resource use is acceptable and the intermediate-term outcome for survivors is good.

Time related quality of life after elective cardiac operation

BACKGROUND

Due to improved operative techniques, myocardial preservation, and perioperative care, open heart procedures are now being performed in older and sicker patients. As a result, the quality of life has become an important issue in the decision making process.

METHODS

Between January 1993 and October 1994, 604 patients above 65 years of age who underwent non-emergent open heart operations were followed prospectively over a 2-year period. The Health Status Questionnaire forms were distributed to all patients preoperatively and to hospital survivors at 3, 12, and 24 months. The questionnaire contains 36 questions and is divided into eight categories. Follow-up was 100% complete with 99.6% of questionnaires returned.

RESULTS

Significant quality of life improvements were noted in all categories after surgery. After reaching a peak at 12 months, there were small, but significant declines in scores relating to physical health and health perception at 24 months. In contrast, measurements for mental attributes continued to increase with time. By multivariate analysis, diabetes, older age, and female gender had a relatively adverse influence on quality of life despite improvement after operation. Similarly, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or having redo operations had lower health perception with some physical limitations. While procedure type (coronary artery bypass grafting) was associated with preoperative bodily pain, congestive heart failure symptoms were not an independent factor affecting quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of life improves with cardiac surgical interventions in this studied age group and should not be denied even in the elderly population.

Aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians: perioperative outcome and clinical follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To determine long-term results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients 80 years old or older, and assess the factors influencing perioperative outcome.

METHODS

Data were reviewed on 83 consecutive octogenarians, undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1992 and 1997. There were 66 women and 17 men (mean age: 82.8 years). Fifty-seven patients (69%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV and six had previous myocardial infarction. Three patients had previous percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. There were 19 urgent procedures (23%). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed on 21 patients (25%). Possible influence of preoperative and operative variables on early and late mortality was performed with univariate and multivariate statistical analysis, and survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 13% (9% for AVR, 24% for AVR-CABG). Postoperative complications were respiratory failure in 19 patients, atrial fibrillation in 19, hemodialysis in four, myocardial infarction in four and stroke in two patients. Five patients required pacemaker insertion for permanent atrioventricular block. Median hospital stay and intensive care unit stay were 19.8 +/- 12.2 days and 7.9 +/- 3.4 days, respectively. Multivariate predictors of hospital death (P < 0.05) were percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty, NYHA class IV, and urgent procedure. Mean follow-up was 26.5 months. Survival at 1, 2, and 5 years was 98.5 +/- 1.4% (63 patients at risk), 93.4 +/- 3.2% (47 patients at risk), and 78.2 +/- 6.9% (six patients at risk), respectively. Preoperative myocardial infarction and urgent procedure were independent predictors of late death. At most recent follow-up, 91% were angina free and 81% were in class I-II.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians can be performed with acceptable mortality. These results stress the importance of early operation on elderly patients with aortic valve disease. Both long-term survival and functional recovery are excellent.

Cardiovascular surgery in the elderly

The elderly segment of the population is increasing rapidly, and surgeons are more frequently being requested to operate on this group of patients. A number of reports suggest that elderly patients have a significantly higher incidence of operative mortality and 30-day hospital mortality as compared with younger patients. Elderly patients also had a significantly higher increased incidence of complications, such as renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and incidence of strokes and postoperative cardiac arrest. Regarding coronary artery disease, elderly patients are more acutely sick on admission, are more likely to have triple-vessel disease, more likely have comorbid disease, and are usually less likely to receive an internal mammary artery graft. The presence of valvular disorders with concomitant coronary disease (especially mitral ischemic related valve disease) increases operative time, morbidity, and mortality. Efforts must continue to be made to gather data on outcomes of cardiac surgery in the elderly. Consideration must be given to modify the operative approach that minimizes cardiopulmonary bypass time, mitigates the multisystem organ injury associated with cardiopulmonary bypass, and decreases the likelihood of embolization from the ascending aorta. Future efforts must be made to develop measures to decrease the complications rate identified in elderly patients.