Emergency department discharge of patients with a negative cranial computed tomography scan after minimal head injury

Utility of Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Detecting Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Falls on Direct Oral Anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Ground level falls in the elderly often lead to complications due to use of anticoagulants (ACs). Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), immediate or delayed, is a feared consequence of such falls. The rate of delayed ICH (dICH) in patients taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet (AP) agents ranges from .6% to 6%. Patients on warfarin have a persistent rate of dICH, leading to implementation of routine repeat head CTs at our institution. This policy was extended to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aims to determine institutional incidence of DOAC-associated dICH.

METHODS

With IRB waiver approval, we conducted a retrospective review of trauma evaluations for falls on DOACs from 2016 to 2018. We reviewed records for neurologic status, DOAC use, and results of initial and delayed head CTs. Exclusion criteria included initial GCS ≤14, new neurologic deficits, traumatic findings on initial CT, concurrent use of additional AC/AP, or absence of repeat head CT.

RESULTS

Among 632 patients evaluated for falls on AC/AP therapy, 159 (25%) of patients were included in the review. The age range was 19-98 years old, with 99 females and 60 males. Half of the patients were on apixaban, with the rest on dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Ten patients presented with GCS of 14. No delayed hemorrhages were detected in this population.

CONCLUSION

The necessity of a repeat head CT in patients taking DOACs is debated in the literature. Our analysis failed to demonstrate any delayed hemorrhage in neurologically intact patients after head strike on DOAC, suggesting no indication for follow-up imaging in this group.

Efficacy of the Canadian CT Head Rule in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Minor Head Injury

Introduction

Approximately, one in three computed tomography (CT) scans performed for head injury may be avoidable. We evaluate the efficacy of the Canadian CT head rule (CCHR) on head CT imaging in minor head injury (MHI) and its association of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and structural abnormality.

Materials and methods

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from May 2018 to October 2019 in the Department of Emergency Medicine, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala. The CCHR is applied to patients with MHIs (GCS 13-15) after initial stabilization and it is ascertained, if they require a non-contrast CT head and imaging is done. For those who do not require CT head as per the CCHR are excluded from this study. After imaging the patients who have a positive finding on CT head are admitted and followed up if they underwent any neurosurgical intervention, those with no findings in CT head are discharged from the hospital. A total of 203 patients were included during study period.

Results

A total of 203 patients were included in study with mean age of 49.5 years. Approximately, 70% (142) were male. Sensitivity of CCHR for predicting positive CT finding in the present study sample was 68% and specificity was 42.5%.

Conclusion

Canadian CT head rule is a useful tool in the Emergency Department for predicting the requirement of CT in patients with MHI. Canadian CT head rule can reduce the number of CT scans ordered following MHI in ED, thus improving the healthcare costs.

How to cite this article

Reddy A, Poonthottathil F, Jonnakuti R, Thomas R. Efficacy of the Canadian CT Head Rule in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Minor Head Injury. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(2):148-151.

Accuracy of head computed tomography scoring systems in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A ProTECT III ancillary study

BACKGROUND

Several types of head CT classification systems have been developed to prognosticate and stratify TBI patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare the predictive value and accuracy of the different CT scoring systems, including the Marshall, Rotterdam, Stockholm, Helsinki, and NIRIS systems, to inform specific patient management actions, using the ProTECT III population of patients with moderate to severe acute traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

We used the data collected in the patients with moderate to severe (GCS score of 4-12) TBI enrolled in the ProTECT III clinical trial. ProTECT III was a NIH-funded, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to determine the efficacy of early administration of IV progesterone. The CT scoring systems listed above were applied to the baseline CT scans obtained in the trial. We assessed the predictive accuracy of these scoring systems with respect to Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended at 6 months, disability rating scale score, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 882 subjects were enrolled in ProTECT III. Worse scores for each head CT scoring systems were highly correlated with unfavorable outcome, disability outcome, and mortality. The NIRIS classification was more strongly correlated than the Stockholm and Rotterdam CT scores, followed by the Helsinki and Marshall CT classification. The highest correlation was observed between NIRIS and mortality (estimated odds ratios of 4.83).

CONCLUSION

All scores were highly associated with 6-month unfavorable, disability and mortality outcomes. NIRIS was also accurate in predicting TBI patients' management and disposition.

Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasingly a major cause of disability across the globe. The current methods of diagnosis are inadequate at classifying patients and prognosis. TBI is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. There is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for TBI yet. It took about 16 years of preclinical research to develop accurate and objective diagnostic measures for TBI. Two brain-specific protein biomarkers, namely, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein, have been extensively characterized. Recently, the two biomarkers were approved by the FDA as the first blood-based biomarker, Brain Trauma Indicator™ (BTI™), via the Breakthrough Devices Program. This scoping review presents (i) TBI diagnosis challenges, (ii) the process behind the FDA approval of biomarkers, and (iii) known unknowns in TBI biomarker biology. The current lag in TBI incidence and hospitalization can be reduced if digital biomarkers such as hard fall detection are standardized and used as a mechanism to alert paramedics to an unresponsive trauma patient.

Trends in utilization of whole-body computed tomography in blunt trauma after MVC: Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database

BACKGROUND

The use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in awake, clinically stable injured patients is controversial. It is associated with unnecessary radiation exposure and increased cost. We evaluate use of computed tomography (CT) imaging during the initial evaluation of injured patients at American College of Surgeons Levels I and II trauma centers (TCs) after blunt trauma.

METHODS

We identified adult blunt trauma patients after motor vehicle crash (MVC) from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2007 and 2016 at Level I or II TCs. We defined awake clinically stable patients as those with systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or higher with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. Computed tomography imaging had to have been performed within 2 hours of arrival. Whole-body computed tomography was defined as simultaneous CT of the head, chest and abdomen, and selective CT if only one to two aforementioned regions were imaged. Patients were stratified by Injury Severity Score (ISS).

RESULTS

There were 217,870 records for analysis; 131,434 (60.3%) had selective CT, and 86,436 (39.7%) had WBCT. Overall, there was an increasing trend in WBCT utilization over the study period (p < 0.001). In patients with ISS less than 10, WBCT was utilized more commonly at Level II versus Level I TCs in patients discharged from the emergency department (26.9% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), which had no surgical procedure(s) (81.4% vs. 80.3%, p < 0.001) and no injury of the head (53.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.008) or abdomen (83.8% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.001). The risk-adjusted odds of WBCT was two times higher at Level II TC vs. Level I (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval 1.82-1.94; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Whole-body computed tomography utilization is increasing relative to selective CT. This increasing utilization is highest at Level II TCs in patients with low ISSs, and in patients without associated head or abdominal injury. The findings have implications for quality improvement and cost reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Care management, Level IV.

Physicians' Risk Tolerance and Head Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Patients With Minor Head Injury

OBJECTIVES

Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of death and disability in children worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the association between physician risk tolerance and head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with minor head injury (MHI) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients (<17 years old) with MHI in the ED and then administered 2 questionnaires (a risk-taking subscale [RTS] of the Jackson Personality Inventory and a malpractice fear scale [MFS]) to attending physicians who had evaluated these patients and made decisions regarding head CT use. The primary outcome was head CT use during ED evaluation; the secondary outcome was ED length of stay and final diagnosis of intracranial injury (ICI).

RESULTS

Of 523 patients with MHI, 233 (44.6%) underwent brain CT, and 16 (3.1%) received a final diagnosis of ICI. Among the 16 emergency physicians (EPs), the median scores of the MFS and RTS were 22 (interquartile range, 17-26) and 23 (interquartile range, 19-25), respectively. Emergency physicians who were most risk averse tended to order more head CT scans compared with the more risk-tolerant EPs (56.96% vs 37.37%; odds ratio, 8.463; confidence interval, 2.783-25.736). The ED length of stay (P = 0.442 and P = 0.889) and final diagnosis (P = 0.155 and P = 0.835) of ICI were not significantly associated with the RTS and MFS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual EP risk tolerance, as measured by RTS, was predictive of CT use in pediatric patients with MHI.

Brain CT requests from emergency department: reality

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the most common reasons for requesting brain CT studies from the emergency department and to calculate the prevalence of urgent acute pathology on this population group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed brain CT studies requested from the emergency department during October and November 2018. We recorded the following variables: age, sex, reason for requesting the study, CT findings, use of contrast agents and reasons for using them, and, in patients who had undergone previous head CT studies, whether the findings had changed. SPSS was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 507 urgent brain CT studies were done (41.4% in men, 58.6% in women; mean age, 65.4±20 years). The most common reason for requesting the study was head trauma (40.5%); only 15.6% of these studies showed acute posttraumatic intracranial lesions. The second most common reason was focal neurologic symptoms (16%); only 16% of these studies showed recent ischemic infarcts or acute bleeding. No pathological findings were reported in 43.2% of the studies. The most common abnormal finding was small vessel disease (20%). Space-occupying lesions (both benign and malignant) were found in 3.9% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Most brain CT studies requested from the emergency department showed no findings that would modify the management of the patient. Overuse of urgent brain CT increases the radiology department's workload and exposes patients to radiation unnecessarily.

Evidence of Prolonged Monitoring of Trauma Patients Admitted via Trauma Resuscitation Unit without Primary Proof of Severe Injuries

Introductio: Although management of severely injured patients in the Trauma Resuscitation Unit (TRU) follows evidence-based guidelines, algorithms for treatment of the slightly injured are limited. Methods: All trauma patients in a period of eight months in a Level I trauma center were followed. Retrospective analysis was performed only in patients ≥18 years with primary TRU admission, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≤ 1, Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) ≤ 1 and Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≤3 after treatment completion and ≥24 h monitoring in the units. Cochran’s Q-test was used for the statistical evaluation of AIS and ISS changes in units. Results: One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients (18.75%) reported new complaints after treatment completion in the TRU. AIS rose from the Intermediate Care Unit (IMC) to Normal Care Unit (NCU) 6.2% and ISS 6.9%. MAIS did not increase >2, and no intervention was necessary for any patient. No correlation was found between computed tomography (CT) diagnostics in TRU and AIS change. Conclusions: The data suggest that AIS, MAIS and ISS did not increase significantly in patients without a severe injury during inpatient treatment, regardless of the type of CT diagnostics performed in the TRU, suggesting that monitoring of these patients may be unnecessary.

Mild TBI in interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation: Treatment challenges and insights

BACKROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has an estimated prevalence rate of 1.7 million occurrences a year in the United States with over 75% of traumatic brain injuries classified as 'mild.' The majority of individuals with mild traumatic brain injuries resume their daily functioning fairly quickly, and many fully within the first year. However, a minority of persons with mild TBI (mTBI), with estimates ranging between 1% and 20%, develop persistent cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and physical symptoms. Clinicians vary considerably in their clinical opinions regarding these individuals and there is no consensus on the treatment protocol for this population.

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript presents four case studies of mild TBI with persistent symptoms treated by a transdisciplinary team in an outpatient neurorehabilitation setting based on community reintegration. Clinical challenges and insights involved in conceptualizing and effectively treating these individuals are discussed to facilitate future direction.

METHODS

Four different mild TBI cases, each with persistent symptoms, but different injury mechanisms, dynamics, and factors affecting symptom persistence, expression, course, and outcome were included in the analysis of their treatment course and outcome. The treatment protocol included: brain injury education combined with supportive counseling for cultivation of positive expectancy effects, symptom-based, graded treatment involving most disciplines, frequent treatment team consultations, collaborations, and planning, and consistent team messages about post-injury recovery and expected return to community activities. Treatment outcomes were assessed with self and family reports, as well as the Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) at admission and at discharge.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Each of the individuals made functional progress during rehabilitation, as evidenced by self and family reports and the MAPI-4. The cases posed various challenges to the treatment team, though a transdisciplinary team under the guidance of a rehabilitation physician and rehabilitation neuropsychologist was able to help patients navigate the path to their functional recovery. In addition to the specific treatment protocol, transdisciplinary team collaboration guided by rehabilitation neuropsychology contributed to treatment success.

[Mild head injury]

INTRODUCTION

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a major health concern, because a sizeable number of patients with mild TBI will develop potentially life-threatening complications. The target of this study was to describe a large series of adult patients suffering from mild TBI, treated at University Hospital of Getafe, between 2010 and 2015 (n = 2480). We examined the patients' epidemiological and baseline clinical profile, diagnosis, treatment and ultimate outcomes, to identify major prognostic factors that influence the final result.

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted patient data from medical records and performed both bivariate and multivariate statistics.

RESULTS

In our sample, mild TBI was more common in men, and the most common causative mechanism was a traffic accident. We proposed a model for classifying patients according to risk, dividing them into low, intermediate and high risk, based upon their baseline clinical picture. This classification scheme correlated well with final outcomes. We investigated indications for skull radiography and computed tomography (CT), as well as for hospital admission for clinical observation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the presence of a neurological focus on clinical examination, the existence of a fracture on plain radiographs, advanced age and the presence of a coagulation disorder were associated with the increased likelihood of intracranial complications and a poor prognosis. The Glasgow Coma Scale was deficient predicting patient outcomes, because it failed to account for concussion-related symptoms like amnesia and loss of consciousness, both very common in patients with mild TBI.

Evaluation of the yield of 24-h close observation in patients with mild traumatic brain injury on anticoagulation therapy: a retrospective multicenter study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) on anticoagulants have an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, consensus is lacking on whether to admit them after normal initial cranial CT. We evaluated the yield of 24-h neurological observation.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study including adult patients admitted over a 5-year period with mTBI on anticoagulation [therapeutic dose heparin, direct oral anticoagulant, or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 1.7] and reportedly normal cranial CT obtained within 24 h after trauma. Primary endpoint was symptomatic ICH within 24 h of injury. Literature on delayed ICH in patients with mTBI and anticoagulation use was reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 17.643 mTBI patients, 905 met the inclusion criteria (median age 82 years). 97% used VKA (median INR 2.9). None developed delayed ICH within 24 h. Nine patients deteriorated neurologically due to ICH, four within 24 h (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-1.2) and five on day 2, 18, 22, 36 and 52, respectively. In six patients, including all four that developed symptoms within 24 h, ICH was found upon reevaluation of initial imaging. The meta-analysis comprised of 9 studies with data from 2885 patients. The estimated pooled proportion of symptomatic delayed ICH or delayed diagnosis of ICH within 24 h was 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed (diagnosis of) ICH within 24 h is very rare in mTBI patients on anticoagulants after reportedly normal initial CT. Routine hospitalization of these patients seems unwarranted when the initial cranial CT is scrupulously evaluated.

Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and the Need for Imaging Surveillance

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the need for repeat head computed tomography (CT) in patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) determined nonoperative after the first head CT.

METHODS

A total of 380 patients with mild TBI and a positive head CT not needing surgery were included. Changes between first and second head CT were categorized as decreased, increased, or stable.

RESULTS

Three patients required neurosurgical intervention (0.8%) after the second CT. There were no significant differences in demographics including age, gender, alcohol consumption, anticoagulation status, time between first and second CT, Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission and discharge, and incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, epidural hematoma, contusion, or skull fractures between the operated and nonoperated groups. All patients in the operated group had subdural hematoma compared with 40.8% in the nonoperated group (P = 0.07). All operated patients showed symptoms of neurologic worsening after initial head CT, compared with 2.7% in the nonoperated group (P < 0.001). Moreover, patients who showed neurologic worsening were more likely to show increased intracranial bleeding on repeat head CT, whereas patients who did not show neurologic worsening were more likely to show decreased or stable intracranial bleeding (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine repeat head CT in patients with complicated mild TBI is very low yield to predict need for delayed surgical intervention. Instead, serial neurologic examination and observation over the first 8 hours after the injury is recommended. A second CT scan should be obtained only in patients who have neurologic worsening.

Investigation of changes in brain natriuretic peptide serum levels and its diagnostic value in patients with mild and moderate head trauma, in patients referred to emergency department of Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, 2013-2014

Background:

Head trauma is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) care. Over the past decade, initial management strategies in mild and moderate head trauma have become focused on selective computed tomography (CT) use based upon presence or absence of specific aspects of patient history and/or clinical examination which has received more attention following reports of increased cancer risk from CT scans. Recently changes in serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels following head trauma have been studied. We investigated the changes in serum levels of BNP in patients with mild and moderate head trauma, in whom the first brain CT scanning was normal.

Materials and Methods:

This study is a cross-sectional, descriptive research. It was performed in patients with mild and moderate head trauma. Forty-one patients with isolated mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale = 9–15) were included. First brain CT scans were obtained during 2 h after ED arrival and the second one after 24 h. Plasma BNP levels were determined using a specific immunoassay system.

Results:

Twenty-three patients were in Group A (with normal first and second brain CT) and 18 patients in Group B (with normal first and abnormal second brain CT). With P = 0.001, serum BNP level = 9.04 was determined for differentiating two groups.

Conclusion:

We concluded that serum BNP level is higher in patients with mild and moderate head trauma with delayed pathologic changes in second brain CT relative to patients with mild and moderate head trauma and with normal delayed brain CT.

Reliability of the NINDS common data elements cranial tomography (CT) rating variables for traumatic brain injury (TBI)

BACKGROUND

Non-contrast head computer tomography (CT) is widely used to evaluate eligibility of patients after acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) for clinical trials. The NINDS Common Data Elements (CDEs) TBI were developed to standardize collection of CT variables. The objectives of this study were to train research assistants (RAs) to rate CDEs and then to evaluate their performance. The aim was to assess inter-rater reliability (IRR) of CDEs between trained RAs and a neurologist and to evaluate applicability of CDEs in acute and sub-acute TBI to test the feasibility of using CDE CT ratings in future trials and ultimately in clinical practice. The second aim was to confirm that the ratings of CDEs reflect pathophysiological events after TBI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

First, a manual was developed for application of the CDEs, which was used to rate brain CTs (n = 100). An excellent agreement was found in combined kappas between RAs on admission and on 24-hour follow-up CTs (Iota = 0.803 and 0.787, respectively). Good IRR (kappa > 0.61) was shown for six CDEs on admissions and for seven CDEs on follow-up CTs. Low IRR (kappa < 0.4) was determined for five CDEs on admission and for four CDEs on follow-up CT. Combined IRR of each assistant with the neurologist were good on admission (Iota = 0.613 and 0.787) and excellent on follow-up CT (Iota = 0.906 and 0.977). Second, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to cluster the rated CDEs (n = 255) and five major components were found that explain 53% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

CT CDEs are useful in clinical studies of TBI. Trained RAs can reliably collect variables. PCA identifies CDE clusters with clinical and biologic plausibility.

ABBREVIATIONS

RA, research assistant; CT, Cranial Tomography; TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury; CDE, Common Data Elements; IRR, inter-rater reliability; PCA, Principal Component Analysis; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; R, rater; CI, confidence interval; CCC, Concordance correlation coefficient; IVH, Intraventricular haemorrhage; DCA, Discriminant Component analysis; SAH, Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.

Transcranial Doppler to Predict Neurologic Outcome after Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

Background

To assess the performance of transcranial Doppler (TCD) in predicting neurologic worsening after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury.

Methods

The authors conducted a prospective observational study across 17 sites. TCD was performed upon admission in 356 patients (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS], 9 to 15) with mild lesions on cerebral computed tomography scan. Normal TCD was defined as a pulsatility index of less than 1.25 and diastolic blood flow velocity higher than 25 cm/s in the two middle cerebral arteries. The primary endpoint was secondary neurologic deterioration on day 7.

Results

Twenty patients (6%) developed secondary neurologic deterioration within the first posttraumatic week. TCD thresholds had 80% sensitivity (95% CI, 56 to 94%) and 79% specificity (95% CI, 74 to 83%) to predict neurologic worsening. The negative predictive values and positive predictive values of TCD were 98% (95% CI, 96 to 100%) and 18% (95% CI, 11to 28%), respectively. In patients with minor traumatic brain injury (GCS, 14 to 15), the sensitivity and specificity of TCD were 91% (95% CI, 59 to 100%) and 80% (95% CI, 75 to 85%), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a multivariate predictive model including age and GCS was significantly improved with the adjunction of TCD. Patients with abnormal TCD on admission (n = 86 patients) showed a more altered score for the disability rating scale on day 28 compared to those with normal TCD (n = 257 patients).

Conclusions

TCD measurements upon admission may provide additional information about neurologic outcome after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. This technique could be useful for in-hospital triage in this context. (Anesthesiology 2016; 125:346-54)

Linear nondisplaced skull fractures in children: who should be observed or admitted?

OBJECT

In this study the authors reviewed clinical management and outcomes in a large series of children with isolated linear nondisplaced skull fractures (NDSFs). Factors associated with hospitalization of these patients and costs of management were also reviewed.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, the authors retrospectively reviewed clinical records and imaging studies for patients between the ages of 0 and 16 years who were evaluated for NDSFs at a single children's hospital between January 2009 and December 2013. Patients were excluded if the fracture was open or comminuted. Additional exclusion criteria included intracranial hemorrhage, more than 1 skull fracture, or pneumocephalus.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. The median patient age was 19 months (range 2 weeks to 15 years). One hundred ninety-three patients (59%) were male and 133 (41%) were female. One hundred eighty-four patients (56%) were placed under 23-hour observation, 87 (27%) were admitted to the hospital, and 55 patients (17%) were discharged from the emergency department. Two hundred seventy-eight patients (85%) arrived by ambulance, 36 (11%) arrived by car, and 12 (4%) were airlifted by helicopter. Two hundred fifty-seven patients (79%) were transferred from another institution. The mean hospital stay for patients admitted to the hospital was 46 hours (range 7-395 hours). The mean hospital stay for patients placed under 23-hour observation status was 18 hours (range 2-43 hours). The reasons for hospitalization longer than 1 day included Child Protective Services involvement in 24 patients and other injuries in 11 patients. Thirteen percent (n = 45) had altered mental status or loss of consciousness by history. No patient had any neurological deficits on examination, and none required neurosurgical intervention. Less than 16% (n = 50) had subsequent outpatient follow-up. These patients were all neurologically intact at the follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization is not necessary for many children with NDSFs. Patients with mental status changes, additional injuries, or possible nonaccidental injury may require observation.

A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury

The incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States was 3.5 million cases in 2009, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is a contributing factor in 30.5% of injury-related deaths among civilians. Additionally, since 2000, more than 260,000 service members were diagnosed with TBI, with the vast majority classified as mild or concussive (76%). The objective assessment of TBI via imaging is a critical research gap, both in the military and civilian communities. In 2011, the Department of Defense (DoD) prepared a congressional report summarizing the effectiveness of seven neuroimaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], transcranial Doppler [TCD], positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, electrophysiologic techniques [magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography], and functional near-infrared spectroscopy) to assess the spectrum of TBI from concussion to coma. For this report, neuroimaging experts identified the most relevant peer-reviewed publications and assessed the quality of the literature for each of these imaging technique in the clinical and research settings. Although CT, MRI, and TCD were determined to be the most useful modalities in the clinical setting, no single imaging modality proved sufficient for all patients due to the heterogeneity of TBI. All imaging modalities reviewed demonstrated the potential to emerge as part of future clinical care. This paper describes and updates the results of the DoD report and also expands on the use of angiography in patients with TBI.

How's the weather? Relationship between weather and trauma admissions at a Level I Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

It is believed commonly that the rate of trauma admissions is affected by weather, particularly temperature.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that there are significant relationships between temperature and trauma admission rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trauma admission data (moderate-to-severe injuries as reported to the NY State Department of Health) from a Level I Trauma Center in Queens, NY were linked with archived hourly weather service data for John F. Kennedy International Airport (4.8 miles distant) from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the period January 2000-December 2009. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of trauma admissions was analyzed by Poisson regression as a function of temperature (per 10 °F as well as other weather parameters); night shift, day of week, and month were added to the model as control variables.

RESULTS

There were 9,490 reportable admissions over 87,144 h, (average 0.109 admissions/h). By mechanism, 7,157 (75.4%) were blunt and 1,967 (20.7%) were penetrating; the remainder were burns, ingestions, or unknown. By Poisson regression analysis, temperature was significantly associated with trauma admissions [IRR 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.22], and had a stronger association with penetrating trauma (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.31). Precipitation, overcast sky, and snow depth were negatively associated with trauma admissions overall, but these did not reach significance for the penetrating subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma admission rate is significantly associated with temperature. Taking weather forecasts into account may be important for planning of care provision, staffing, and resource allocation in trauma units and emergency departments.

Imaging in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and Traumatic Brain Injury

Context:

The diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can only be made pathologically, and there is no concordance of defined clinical criteria for premorbid diagnosis. The absence of established criteria and the insufficient imaging findings to detect this disease in a living athlete are of growing concern.

Evidence Acquisition:

The article is a review of the current literature on CTE. Databases searched include Medline, PubMed, JAMA evidence, and evidence-based medicine guidelines Cochrane Library, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Cornell Library databases.

Study Design:

Clinical review.

Level of Evidence:

Level 4.

Results:

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy cannot be diagnosed on imaging. Examples of imaging findings in common types of head trauma are discussed.

Conclusion:

Further study is necessary to correlate the clinical and imaging findings of repetitive head injuries with the pathologic diagnosis of CTE.

Traumatic axonal injury and persistent emotional lability in an adolescent following moderate traumatic brain injury: A case study

A 15-year-old male was treated secondary to sustaining a moderate traumatic brain injury (moderate TBI). Symptom self-report, and computerized and paper-and-pencil-based neurocognitive, vestibular/ocular motor, and imaging data were used throughout to document impairment and recovery. The patient demonstrated persistent emotional lability concurrent with vestibular impairment. In addition to clinical evaluation and management, the patient also underwent susceptibility-weighted imaging, which revealed axonal shearing across the corpus callosum and areas innervating the prefrontal cortex. Paper-and-pencil neurocognitive measures revealed persisting deficits, despite normal-appearing computerized test results. Implications of this case underline the importance of an integrative evaluation process including clinical interview, neurocognitive and vestibular/ocular physical therapy, and advanced neuroimaging, especially in cases with atypical presentation.

You Cannot Go Home: Routine Concussion Evaluation is not Enough

Traditional care of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is to discharge patients from the emergency department (ED) if they have a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15 and a normal head computed tomography (CT) scan. However, this does not address short-term neurocognitive deficits. Our hypothesis is that a notable percentage of patients will need outpatient neurocognitive therapy despite a reassuring initial presentation. This is a retrospective review of patients with MTBI at an urban Level I trauma center. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of MTBI in patients 14 years old or older, GCS 15, negative head CT scan, a completed neurocognitive evaluation, blunt mechanism, and no confounding psychiatric comorbidities. Six thousand thirty-two patients were admitted over 18 months. Three hundred ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 38 years (range, 14 to 93 years), 64 per cent were male, and mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 8.1. Forty-one per cent were cleared for discharge without follow-up. Twenty-seven per cent required ongoing neurocognitive therapy. Three per cent were deemed unsafe for discharge home. Of the patients cleared for discharge, 88 per cent had positive/questionable loss of consciousness (LOC), whereas 81 per cent who required additional therapy had positive/questionable LOC ( P = 0.20). Age, gender, ISS, and alcohol use were compared between the groups and not found to be statistically different rendering them poor predictors for appropriate discharge from the ED. A surprisingly high percentage (27%) of patients who would have met traditional ED discharge criteria were found to have persistent deficits after neurocognitive testing and were referred for ongoing therapy. We provide evidence to suggest that we should take pause before discharging patients with MTBI without a cognitive evaluation.

Risk factors of delayed surgical evacuation for initially nonoperative acute subdural hematomas following mild head injury

BACKGROUND

Although the majority of patients with minimal acute subdural hematomas (aSDHs) can be managed conservatively, some require delayed aSDH evacuation due to hematoma enlargement. This study was designed to determine the risk factors associated with delayed hematoma enlargement leading to surgery in patients with aSDHs who did not initially require surgical intervention.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2012, 98 patients were treated for nonoperative aSDHs following mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15). The outcome variables were radiographic evidence of SDH enlargement on serially obtained computed tomography (CT) images and later surgical evacuation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to both the demographic and initial radiographic features to identify risk factors for SDH progression and surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 64 patients (65 %) revealed minimal SDH or spontaneous hematoma resolution (conservative group) with conservative management at their last follow-up CT scan. The remaining 34 patients (35 %) received delayed hematoma evacuation (delayed surgery group) a median of 17 days after the head trauma. There were no significant differences between the two groups for baseline characteristics, including age, injury type, degree of brain atrophy, prior history of antithrombotic drugs, and coagulopathy. The presence of cerebral contusions and subarachnoid hemorrhages was more common in the conservative group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.003, respectively). On multivariate analysis, hematoma volume (p = 0.01, odds ratio [OR] = 1.094, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.021-1.173) and degree of midline shift (p = 0.01, OR = 1.433, 95 % CI = 1.088-1.888) on the initial CT scan were independently associated with delayed hematoma evacuation.

CONCLUSIONS

A critical proportion of patients with minimal aSDHs occurring after mild head injury can progress over several weeks and require hematoma evacuation. Especially patients with a large initial SDH volume and accompanying midline shift require careful monitoring of hematoma progression.

Delayed neurological deterioration after mild head injury: cause, temporal course, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Mild head injury (MHI) complicated by an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a common cause of hospital admission after head trauma. Most patients are treated nonoperatively, remain neurologically stable, and are discharged uneventfully. However, a small percentage of patients suffer delayed neurological deterioration (DND). Little is known about the characteristics of DND after an MHI complicated by ICH.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the cause, temporal course, and outcomes of patients who deteriorated neurologically after presenting with MHI and ICH.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all adult patients presenting over 54 consecutive months with MHI and ICH. Patients who were treated nonoperatively after initial head computed tomography and had a subsequent DND (Glasgow Coma Scale score decrease ≥2) were identified. Demographics, neurological status, clinical course, radiographic findings, and outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

Over 54 months, 757 patients with MHI plus ICH were admitted for observation; of these, 31 (4.1%) experienced DND. Eighty-seven percent of patients deteriorated within 24 hours after admission. Twenty-one patients (68%) deteriorated as a result of progressive intracranial hemorrhage, and 10 patients (32%) deteriorated as a result of medical causes. Seven patients (23%) died. Variables significantly associated with mortality included age > 60 years, coagulopathy, and change in Marshall computed tomography classification.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of delayed neurological deterioration after MHI with ICH is low and usually occurs within 24 hours after admission. It results in significant morbidity and mortality if it is the result of progressive intracranial hemorrhage. Further research is needed to identify risk factors that can allow early detection and improve outcomes in these patients.

Interpretation of Computed Tomography of the Head: Emergency Physicians versus Radiologists

BACKGROUND

Many patients are brought to crowded emergency departments (ED) of hospitals every day for evaluation of head injuries, headaches, neurologic deficits etc. CT scan of the head is the most common diagnostic measure used to search for pathologies. In many EDs the initial interpretation of images are performed by emergency physicians (EP). Since most decisions are made based on the initial interpretation of the images by emergency physicians and not the radiologists, it is necessary to assess the accuracy of interpretations made by the former group.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the findings reported in the interpretation of head CTs by emergency physicians and compare to radiologists (the gold standard).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cross sectional study conducted from March to May 2009 in a teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. All non-contrast head CTs obtained during the study period were copied on DVDs and sent separately to a radiologist, 6 emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians and 14 senior EM residents for interpretation. Clinical information pertaining to each patient was also sent with each CT. The radiologist's interpretation was considered as the gold standard and reference for comparison. Data from EM physicians and residents were compared with the reference as well as with each other and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.5.

RESULTS

Out of 544 CT scans, EM physicians had 35 false negatives and 53 false positives compared with radiologist's interpretations (P < 0.0001). EM residents had 74 false negatives and 12 false positives compared with radiologist's interpretations (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both EPs and ER residents either missed or falsely called a significant number of pathologies in their interpretations. The interpretations of EPs and ER residents were more sensitive and more specific, respectively. These findings revealed the need for increased training time in head CT reading for residents and the necessity of attending continuing medical education workshops for emergency physicians.

Spectrum of surgical trauma and associated head injuries at a university hospital in eastern Nepal

Background:

Trauma is one of the common surgical emergencies presenting at B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Nepal, a tertiary referral center catering to the needs of the population of Eastern Nepal and nearby districts of India.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to analyze the magnitude, epidemiological, clinical profile and outcome of trauma at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences.

Materials and Methods:

This descriptive case series study includes all patients with history of trauma coming to BPKIHS emergency and referred to the surgery department. We noted the detailed clinical history and examination, demographics, mechanism of injury, nature of injury, time of reporting in emergency, treatment offered (operative or non operative management) and analyzed details of operative procedure (i.e. laparotomy, thoracotomy, craniotomy etc.), average length of hospital stay, morbidity and outcome (according to Glasgow outcome scale). Collected data were analyzed using EpiInfo 2000 statistical software.

Results:

There were 1848 patients eligible to be included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 28.9 ± 19.3 years. Majority of the patients (38%) belonged to the age group of 21 - 40 years and the male to female ratio was 2.7:1. Most of the trauma victims were students (30%) followed by laborers (27%) and farmers (22%) respectively. The commonest causes of injury were fall from height (39%), road traffic accident (38%) and physical assault (18%); 78% of the patients were managed conservatively and 22% underwent operative management. Postoperative complications were seen in 18%. Wound infection 7.5%, neurological deficit including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) otrorrhea was seen in 2.2% patients. Good recovery was seen in 84%, moderate disability in 5.2% patients and severe disability in 1.4% patients. The mortally was 6.3% and most of the deaths were related to traumatic brain injuries.

Conclusions:

In Nepal, trauma-related injury contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality and is the third leading cause of death. There are very few studies on trauma from this country and hence this study will help in understanding the etiology and outcome particularly in the Eastern region of Nepal.

Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update

BACKGROUND

The management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries is still controversial. In 2000, the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee (SNC) presented evidence-based guidelines for initial management of these injuries. Since then, considerable new evidence has emerged.

METHODS

General methodology according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II framework and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Systematic evidence-based review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, based upon relevant clinical questions with respect to patient-important outcomes, including Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) and Centre of Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) quality ratings. Based upon the results, GRADE recommendations, guidelines and discharge instructions were drafted. A modified Delphi approach was used for consensus and relevant clinical stakeholders were consulted.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the updated SNC guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injury in adults including criteria for computed tomography (CT) scan selection, admission and discharge with suggestions for monitoring routines and discharge advice for patients. The guidelines are designed to primarily detect neurosurgical intervention with traumatic CT findings as a secondary goal. For elements lacking good evidence, such as in-hospital monitoring, routines were largely based on consensus. We suggest external validation of the guidelines before widespread clinical use is recommended.

Evaluation and management of mild traumatic brain injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline

BACKGROUND

An estimated 1.1 million people sustain a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) annually in the United States. The natural history of MTBI remains poorly characterized, and its optimal clinical management is unclear. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma had previously published a set of practice management guidelines for MTBI in 2001. The purpose of this review was to update these guidelines to reflect the literature published since that time.

METHODS

The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles related to MTBI published between 1998 and 2011. Selected older references were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 112 articles were reviewed and used to construct a series of recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The previous recommendation that brain computed tomographic (CT) should be performed on patients that present acutely with suspected brain trauma remains unchanged. A number of additional recommendations were added. Standardized criteria that may be used to determine which patients receive a brain CT in resource-limited environments are described. Patients with an MTBI and negative brain CT result may be discharged from the emergency department if they have no other injuries or issues requiring admission. Patients taking warfarin who present with an MTBI should have their international normalized ratio (INR) level determined, and those with supratherapeutic INR values should be admitted for observation. Deficits in cognition and memory usually resolve within 1 month but may persist for longer periods in 20% to 40% of cases. Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance, or biochemical markers for the clinical management of MTBI is not supported at the present time.

The pathophysiology of concussion

Concussion is defined as a biomechanically induced brain injury characterized by the absence of gross anatomic lesions. Early and late clinical symptoms, including impairments of memory and attention, headache, and alteration of mental status, are the result of neuronal dysfunction mostly caused by functional rather than structural abnormalities. The mechanical insult initiates a complex cascade of metabolic events leading to perturbation of delicate neuronal homeostatic balances. Starting from neurotoxicity, energetic metabolism disturbance caused by the initial mitochondrial dysfunction seems to be the main biochemical explanation for most postconcussive signs and symptoms. Furthermore, concussed cells enter a peculiar state of vulnerability, and if a second concussion is sustained while they are in this state, they may be irreversibly damaged by the occurrence of swelling. This condition of concussion-induced brain vulnerability is the basic pathophysiology of the second impact syndrome. N-acetylaspartate, a brain-specific compound representative of neuronal metabolic wellness, is proving a valid surrogate marker of the post-traumatic biochemical damage, and its utility in monitoring the recovery of the aforementioned "functional" disturbance as a concussion marker is emerging, because it is easily detectable through proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Transcranial Doppler to screen on admission patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Detecting patients at risk for secondary neurological deterioration (SND) after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) on admission in screening these patients.

METHODS

This prospective, observational cohort study enrolled 98 traumatic brain injury patients with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9 to 15 whose initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed either absent or mild lesions according to the Trauma Coma Data Bank (TCDB) classification, ie, TCDB I and TCDB II, respectively. TCD measurements of the 2 middle cerebral arteries were obtained on admission under stable conditions in all patients. Neurological outcome was reassessed on day 7.

RESULTS

Of the 98 patients, 21 showed SND, ie, a decrease of ≥ 2 points from the initial Glasgow Coma Scale or requiring any treatment for neurological deterioration. Diastolic cerebral blood flow velocities and pulsatility index measurements were different between patients with SND and patients with no SND. Using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, we found the best threshold limits to be 25 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 76%; area under curve, 0.93) for diastolic cerebral blood flow velocity and 1.25 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 91%; area under curve, 0.95) for pulsatility index. According to a recursive-partitioning analysis, TCDB classification and TCD measurements were the most discriminative among variables to detect patients at risk for SND.

CONCLUSION

In patients with no severe brain lesions on CT after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury, TCD on admission, in complement with brain CT scan, could accurately screen patients at risk for SND.

External validation of the New Orleans Criteria (NOC), the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II (NEXUS II) for CT scanning in pediatric patients with minor head injury in a non-trauma center

BACKGROUND

Head CT scans are considered the imaging modality of choice to screen patients with head trauma for neurocranial injuries; however, widespread CT imaging is not recommended and much research has been conducted to establish objective clinical predictors of intracranial injury (ICI) in order to optimize the use of neuroimaging in children with minor head trauma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a strict application of the New Orleans Criteria (NOC), Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II (NEXUS II) in pediatric patients with head trauma presenting to a non-trauma center (level II) could reduce the number of cranial CT scans performed without missing clinically significant ICI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with head trauma who received a cranial CT scan between Jan. 1, 2001, and Sept. 1, 2008, and identified which patients would have required a scan based on the criteria of the above listed decision instruments. We then determined the sensitivities, specificities and negative predictive values of these aids.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 2,101 patients, 92 (4.4%) had positive head CT findings. The sensitivities for the NOC, CCHR and NEXUS II were 96.7% (95%CI 93.1-100), 65.2% (95%CI 55.5-74.9) and 78.3% (95%CI 69.9-86.7), respectively, and their negative predictive values were 98.7%, 97.6% and 97.2%, respectively. In contrast, the specificities for these aids were 11.2% (95%CI 9.8-12.6), 64.2% (95%CI 62.1-66.3) and 34.2% (95%CI 32.1-36.3), respectively. Therefore, in our population it would have been possible to scan at least 10.9% fewer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of cranial CT scans conducted in our pediatric cohort with head trauma would have been reduced had any of the three clinical decision aids been applied. Therefore, we recommend that further validation and adoption of pediatric head CT decision aids in non-trauma centers be considered to ultimately increase patient safety while reducing medical expense.

Do children with blunt head trauma and normal cranial computed tomography scan results require hospitalization for neurologic observation?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Children evaluated in the emergency department (ED) with minor blunt head trauma, defined by initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 14 or 15, are frequently hospitalized despite normal cranial computed tomography (CT) scan results. We seek to identify the frequency of neurologic complications in children with minor blunt head trauma and normal ED CT scan results.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study of children younger than 18 years with blunt head trauma (including isolated head or multisystem trauma) at 25 centers between 2004 and 2006. In this substudy, we analyzed individuals with initial GCS scores of 14 or 15 who had normal cranial CT scan results during ED evaluation. An abnormal imaging study result was defined by any intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral edema, pneumocephalus, or any skull fracture. Patients with normal CT scan results who were hospitalized were followed to determine neurologic outcomes; those discharged to home from the ED received telephone/mail follow-up to assess for subsequent neuroimaging, neurologic complications, or neurosurgical intervention.

RESULTS

Children (13,543) with GCS scores of 14 or 15 and normal ED CT scan results were enrolled, including 12,584 (93%) with GCS scores of 15 and 959 (7%) with GCS scores of 14. Of 13,543 patients, 2,485 (18%) were hospitalized, including 2,107 of 12,584 (17%) with GCS scores of 15 and 378 of 959 (39%) with GCS scores of 14. Of the 11,058 patients discharged home from the ED, successful telephone/mail follow-up was completed for 8,756 (79%), and medical record, continuous quality improvement, and morgue review was performed for the remaining patients. One hundred ninety-seven (2%) children received subsequent CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 5 (0.05%) had abnormal CT/MRI scan results and none (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0% to 0.03%) received a neurosurgical intervention. Of the 2,485 hospitalized patients, 137 (6%) received subsequent CT or MRI; 16 (0.6%) had abnormal CT/MRI scan results and none (0%; 95% CI 0% to 0.2%) received a neurosurgical intervention. The negative predictive value for neurosurgical intervention for a child with an initial GCS score of 14 or 15 and a normal CT scan result was 100% (95% CI 99.97% to 100%).

CONCLUSION

Children with blunt head trauma and initial ED GCS scores of 14 or 15 and normal cranial CT scan results are at very low risk for subsequent traumatic findings on neuroimaging and extremely low risk of needing neurosurgical intervention. Hospitalization of children with minor head trauma after normal CT scan results for neurologic observation is generally unnecessary.

Comparative study of earthquake-related and non-earthquake-related head traumas using multidetector computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

The features of earthquake-related head injuries may be different from those of injuries obtained in daily life because of differences in circumstances. We aim to compare the features of head traumas caused by the Sichuan earthquake with those of other common head traumas using multidetector computed tomography.

METHODS

In total, 221 patients with earthquake-related head traumas (the earthquake group) and 221 patients with other common head traumas (the non-earthquake group) were enrolled in our study, and their computed tomographic findings were compared. We focused the differences between fractures and intracranial injuries and the relationships between extracranial and intracranial injuries.

RESULTS

More earthquake-related cases had only extracranial soft tissue injuries (50.7% vs. 26.2%, RR = 1.9), and fewer cases had intracranial injuries (17.2% vs. 50.7%, RR = 0.3) compared with the non-earthquake group. For patients with fractures and intracranial injuries, there were fewer cases with craniocerebral injuries in the earthquake group (60.6% vs. 77.9%, RR = 0.8), and the earthquake-injured patients had fewer fractures and intracranial injuries overall (1.5 + 0.9 vs. 2.5 +1.8; 1.3 + 0.5 vs. 2.1 + 1.1). Compared with the non-earthquake group, the incidences of soft tissue injuries and cranial fractures combined with intracranial injuries in the earthquake group were significantly lower (9.8% vs. 43.7%, RR = 0.2; 35.1% vs. 82.2%, RR = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

As depicted with computed tomography, the severity of earthquake-related head traumas in survivors was milder, and isolated extracranial injuries were more common in earthquake-related head traumas than in non-earthquake-related injuries, which may have been the result of different injury causes, mechanisms and settings.

Mild traumatic brain injury: key decisions in acute management

The definition of a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) has come under close scrutiny and is changing as a result of refined diagnostic testing. Although up to 15% of patients with a mild TBI will have an acute intracranial lesion identified on head computed tomography (CT), less than 1% of these patients will have a lesion requiring a neurosurgical intervention. Evidence-based guideline methodology has assisted in generating recommendations to facilitate clinical decision making; however, no set of guidelines is 100% sensitive and specific. Evidence supports the safety of discharging patients with mild TBI who have a negative CT. However, though patients with a negative CT are at almost no risk of deteriorating from a neurosurgical lesion, a key intervention is to provide these patients at discharge from the emergency department with counseling regarding postconcussive symptoms, when to return to work, school, or sports, and when to seek additional medical care.

Reduction of Radiation Dose in Pediatric Brain CT is not Associated with Missed Injuries or Delayed Diagnosis

Increased accuracy of CTs in the identification of traumatic injuries compared with physical examination or conventional radiography is well documented. Our goal was to identify the most effective strategy for decreasing radiation exposure while retaining the benefits of computerized imaging. Based on a literature review and our trauma registry, the mortality risk of untreated injuries was compared with that of patients who received treatment of injuries diagnosed by CT. Because automated exposure control of tube current is not routinely used with brain CT, this region was identified as the initial focus for a dose-saving algorithm. CT settings were adjusted for children studies and the new settings were implemented into four protocols based on age. Images were compared and reviewed by radiologists for the ability to identify traumatic injuries. Effective dose (ED) was estimated using Monte Carlo simulations. The lifetime incidence and mortality for thyroid cancer and leukemia were assessed. In-hospital mortality of unidentified injury in trauma patients is 8.0%. Forty dose-saving CTs were performed and no injuries were missed. The ED decreased by 5.2-, 4.5-, 2.62-, and 2.5-fold in each group. Decreasing the ED is achievable, theoretically decreases the cancer risk and does not increase the missed injury rate.

Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common heterogeneous neurological disorder with a wide range of possible clinical outcomes. Accurate prediction of outcome is desirable for optimal treatment. This study aimed both to identify the demographic, clinical, and computed tomographic (CT) characteristics associated with unfavorable outcome at 6 months after mTBI, and to design a prediction model for application in daily practice. All consecutive mTBI patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score: 13-15) admitted to our hospital who were age 16 or older were included during an 8-year period as part of the prospective Radboud University Brain Injury Cohort Study (RUBICS). Outcome was assessed at 6 months post-trauma using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), dichotomized into unfavorable (GOSE score 1-6) and favorable (GOSE score 7-8) outcome groups. The predictive value of several variables was determined using multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. We included 2784 mTBI patients and found CT abnormalities in 20.7% of the 1999 patients that underwent a head CT. Age, extracranial injuries, and day-of-injury alcohol intoxication proved to be the strongest outcome predictors. The presence of facial fractures and the number of hemorrhagic contusions emerged as CT predictors. Furthermore, we showed that the predictive value of a scheme based on a modified Injury Severity Score (ISS), alcohol intoxication, and age equalled the value of one that also included CT characteristics. In fact, it exceeded one that was based on CT characteristics alone. We conclude that, although valuable for the identification of the individual mTBI patient at risk for deterioration and eventual neurosurgical intervention, CT characteristics are imperfect predictors of outcome after mTBI.

Emergency department radiology: reality or luxury? An international comparison

Changes in society and developments within emergency care affect imaging in the emergency department. It is clear that radiologists have to be pro-active to even survive. High quality service is the goal, and if we are to add value to the diagnostic (and therapeutic) chain of healthcare, sub-specialization is the key, and, although specifically patient-oriented and not organ-based, emergency and trauma imaging is well suited for that. The development of emergency radiology in Europe and the United States is compared with emphasis on how different healthcare systems and medical cultures affect the utilization of Acute Care imaging.

The economic impact of S-100B as a pre-head CT screening test on emergency department management of adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury

Recent research suggests that serum S-100B may serve as a good pre-head computed tomography (CT) screening test because of its high sensitivity for abnormal head CT scans. The potential economic impact of using S-100B in the emergency department setting for management of adult patients with isolated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) has not been evaluated despite its clinical implementation in Europe. Using evidence from the literature, we constructed a decision tree to compare the average cost per patient of using S-100B as a pre-head CT screening test to the current practice of ordering CT scans based on patients' presenting symptoms without the aid of S-100B. When compared to scanning 45-77% of isolated mTBI patients based upon their presenting symptoms, using S-100B as a pre-head CT screen does not lower hospital costs ($281 versus $160), primarily due to its low specificity for abnormal head CT scans. Sensitivity analyses showed, however, that S-100B becomes cost-lowering when the proportion of mTBI patients being scanned exceeds 78%, or when final CT scan results require 96 min or more than the wait for blood test results. Generally speaking, if blood test results require less time than imaging, and if head CT scan rates for patients with isolated mTBI are relatively high, using S-100B will lower costs. Recommendations for using S-100B as a screening tool should account for setting-specific characteristics and their consequent economic impacts. Despite its high sensitivity and excellent negative predictive value, serum S-100B has low specificity and low positive predictive value, limiting its ability to reduce numbers of CT scans and hospital costs.

Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting

This clinical policy provides evidence-based recommendations on select issues in the management of adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the acute setting. It is the result of joint efforts between the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and was developed by a multidisciplinary panel. The critical questions addressed in this clinical policy are: (1) Which patients with mild TBI should have a noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department (ED)? (2) Is there a role for head magnetic resonance imaging over noncontrast CT in the ED evaluation of a patient with acute mild TBI? (3) In patients with mild TBI, are brain specific serum biomarkers predictive of an acute traumatic intracranial injury? (4) Can a patient with an isolated mild TBI and a normal neurologic evaluation result be safely discharged from the ED if a noncontrast head CT scan shows no evidence of intracranial injury? Inclusion criteria for application of this clinical policy's recommendations are nonpenetrating trauma to the head, presentation to the ED within 24 hours of injury, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or 15 on initial evaluation in the ED, and aged 16 years or greater. The primary outcome measure for questions 1, 2, and 3 is the presence of an acute intracranial injury on noncontrast head CT scan; the primary outcome measure for question 4 is the occurrence of neurologic deterioration.