"I would like to be a surgeon, but."

Report from the Committee for Improving the Work Environment of Japanese Surgeons: survey on effects of the fee revision for medical services provided by surgeons

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to achieve improvements in the work environment of Japanese surgeons and shortage of surgeons.

METHODS

Questionnaires were distributed to selected Japanese surgical Society (JSS) members. Retrospective analysis was conducted comparing the current 2011 survey with previous 2007 survey. To examine the influence of 2010 revision of the fee for medical services performed by surgeons, we distributed a second questionnaire to directors of hospitals and administrators of clerks belonging to official institutes in JSS. Collective data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The main potential causes for the shortage of surgeons in Japan were long hours (72.8 %), excessive emergency surgeries (69.4 %), and high risk of lawsuit (67.7 %). Mean weekly working hours of surgeons in national or public university hospitals and private university hospitals were 96.2 and 85.6, respectively. Approximately 70 % of surgeons were forced to do hardworking tasks, possibly leading to death from overwork. Of note, approximately 25 % of surgeons had over time of more than 100 h a week, coinciding to the number of hours that might lead to death from fatigue, described in the Japanese labor law. Although the total medical service fee in hospitals, especially in large-scale hospitals with more than 500 beds, increased markedly after 2010 revision of the fee for medical services performed by surgeons, few hospitals gave perquisites and/or incentives to surgeons.

CONCLUSION

To prevent and avoid collapse of the surgical specialty in Japan, an improvement in the work environment of surgeons by initiation of the JSS would be required as soon as possible.

Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a reliable one-port procedure

BACKGROUND

Emergency surgical procedures frequently must be performed at times when availability of adequately trained personnel is problematic yet the requirements for maintaining surgical quality and patient safety remain unchanged. This report aims to describe a safe, effective, transumbilical, one-port laparoscopic technique for appendectomy that can be performed by one surgeon.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2008, transumbilical one-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TOPLA) was used by two pediatric surgeons in the authors' department to treat 152 consecutive patients presenting with simple and complicated appendicitis. With the patient placed in the Trendelenburg position and rotated to the left, a single surgeon was easily able to perform the procedure using a 10-mm 0° operative laparoscope (Karl Storz) with a 5-mm working channel. The appendix was lifted with transabdominal suspensory sutures to facilitate its removal. The results were compared with those for 112 patients receiving open appendectomy (OA) during the same period.

RESULTS

The operative time was significantly shortened using TOPLA (mean, 61.5 min) compared with using OA (mean, 118.3 min) (p = 0.000). Despite significantly higher numbers of patients with complicated appendicitis enrolled in the TOPLA arm of the study, the rate of wound infection was significantly lower after TOPLA (0%, 0/152) than after OA (9.8%, 11/112) (p = 0.000). The number of patients requesting intramuscular or intravenous analgesics for pain relief was significantly lower after TOPLA than after OA. The overall results for TOPLA were comparable with those for the more common three-port laparoscopic procedure, but it offers the alternative of having an inconspicuous scar hidden within the umbilicus.

CONCLUSION

This report describes a simple and safe laparoscopic procedure that offers an effective way for one surgeon to treat simple and complicated appendicitis through a single port with satisfactory cosmetic outcomes.

Uncovering system errors using a rapid response team: cross-coverage caught in the crossfire

BACKGROUND

Because of the 80-hour work week, extensive service cross-coverage creates great potential for patient care errors. These patient care emergencies are increasingly managed using a rapid response team (RRT) to reduce patient morbidity. We examine the proximate causes of a surgical RRT activation. We hypothesize that most RRTs would occur during cross-coverage hours and be preventable or potentially preventable.

METHODS

All surgical RRTs more than a 15-month period were captured using a nursing database and the note from the staffing intensivist/fellow. RRTs were reviewed for appropriateness (pre-existing criteria) and proximate cause. Proximate causes were further classified as patient disease, team error, nursing error, or system error as well as preventable, potentially preventable, or nonpreventable.

RESULTS

Of 98 RRT activations, complete data were available for 82 (84%); 100% met activation criteria; and 76 (93%) occurred between 2100 and 0600. Seventy-six patients were 48 hours to 72 hours postoperative; six had nonoperatively managed injuries. The most common reason for activation was impending respiratory failure and acute volume overload (n = 72; 88%). RRT therapies included diuretics (n = 72), antiarrhythmics (n = 48), oxygen (n = 82), and bronchodilators (n = 36); only 2 received blood component therapy. Seventy-eight patients (95%) were transferred to higher level of care (61, surgical intensive care unit; 17, SSDU). Only 46% of patients required intubation. Performance improvement review identified 90% of physician related RRTs as preventable/potentially preventable because of errors in judgment or omission. Four RRTs because of patient disease were unpreventable. Two potentially preventable errors were each ascribed to RN or system concerns.

CONCLUSION

RRT activations principally result from team-based errors of omission, more often occur between 2100 and 0600, and are more often preventable or potentially preventable. Careful attention to fluid balance and medications for comorbid diseases would reduce RRT needs.

Ensinar cirurgia: como e para quem?

O autor discute a crise atual de formação de médicos e de cirurgiões fazendo uma revisão de dados de literatura atual, referentes ao quantitativo de médicos e discussão de referências éticas e filosóficas da profissão. Há uma diminuição crescente na formação de médicos e cirurgiões, com uma crescente participação de mulheres. Os médicos jovens buscam qualidade de vida e autonomia profissional como principais requisitos profissionais. As síndromes de burn-out são comuns entre os médicos em atividade, e a perda de autonomia profissional tem papel preponderante na determinação da doença. A crise que atinge a profissão médica e as especialidades cirúrgicas tem bases éticas, sociais e financeiras. É necessário e fundamental discutir novos paradigmas de educação e atuação profissional na sociedade moderna.

Perceptions and Predictors of Surgeon Satisfaction: A Survey of Spouses of Academic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have addressed the role of spouses in physicians' career choices, there is limited data about spousal perception of surgeons' careers after training. This study examined satisfaction with surgeons' careers and potential contributing factors from a spousal standpoint.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey of spouses of academic surgeons in 38 participating departments was conducted. Questions included demographic information and perceptions of career satisfaction and contributing factors. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-nine surveys (27%) were returned, with the majority (81%) perceiving their surgeon spouses to be satisfied. Contributing factors to surgeon dissatisfaction included: work hours/call (42%); practice limitations (18%); reimbursement/income (12%); and malpractice/insurance (7%). Dissatisfied surgeons, as perceived by their spouses, did not differ from satisfied surgeons in terms of work hours, income expectations, geographic desirability, or home involvement. On the other hand, predictors of dissatisfied spouses included lack of input into career decisions, less satisfaction with location, and lack of their surgeon spouses' participation in household and child-care activities.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many positive and negative aspects to being an academic surgeon. Yet, despite the time commitment, work hours per se do not appear to contribute to either surgeon or spousal satisfaction. Spousal satisfaction is dependent on surgeon contribution to household and childcare activities. Despite the multiple potential detractors from an academic surgical career, most surgeons, as perceived by their spouses, would not have chosen differently and are satisfied with their career choices.