Context-sensitive half-time and anesthesia: how does theory match reality?

Cardiac Preconditioning Effect of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine versus Fentanyl-Propofol during Arrested Heart Revascularization

Background

Myocardial damage due to ischemia and reperfusion is still unavoidable during coronary surgery. Anesthetic agents have myocardial preconditioning effect. Ketamine has sympathomimetic effect, while dexmedetomidine has a sympatholytic effect in addition to anesthetic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties of both the drugs. This study was carried out to compare ketamine-dexmedetomidine (KD) combination with fentanyl-propofol (FP) combination on the release of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and outcome after coronary artery bypass graft.

Patients and Methods

Ninety adult patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were assigned to receive either KD base anesthesia (KD group) or FP anesthesia (FP group). Trends of high-sensitive cTnT, CK-MB, and serum cortisol were followed in the first postoperative 24 h. Other outcomes were vital signs, weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, tracheal extubation time, and echocardiographic findings.

Results

There was a significant lower release of cTnT in KD group than FP group during its peak values at 6 h after aortic unclamping (92.01 ± 7.332 in KD versus 96.73 ± 12.532 ng.L^-1 P = 0.032). significant lower levels of serum cortisol levels were noted KD group than in FP group at 6 and 12 h after aortic unclamping P < 0.001. As regard tracheal extubation time, patients assigned to KD group extubated earlier than whom in FP group 202.22 ± 28.674 versus 304.67 ± 40.598 min respectively P < 0.001.

Conclusion

The use of KD during on-pump CABG confers better myocardial protective and anti-inflammatory effect than fentanyl propofol.

Correlation of elimination fraction area under the curve with total body clearance

This study attempted to determine the area under the curve ([Formula: see text]), which corresponds to the sum of all elimination processes correlated with the total clearance value. The study attempted to determine the [Formula: see text] based on the coordinates known from classic non-compartmental pharmacokinetics for a single administration of the drug. 318 pharmacokinetics profiles were used for the analysis, obtained from 220 healthy subjects over ten studies. Pharmacokinetic calculations were performed with the use of Phoenix™ WinNonlin(®) 6.3. The leave-one-out (LOO) method was used for model cross-validation. Squared cross-validated correlation coefficient (Q (2)) parameter and the difference between Q (2) and R (2) were calculated as a measure of the internal performance and model predictive ability. A high correlation between the clearance value and [Formula: see text] was demonstrated (R (2) > 0.65). However, only in the case of four studies was it possible to validate the linear model using the leave-one-out validation procedure (R (2) > 0.86). The present study proposed a method of graphical and mathematical determination of the area under the curve for the drug elimination process after a single dose of the drug. Furthermore, the concept of calculating the statistical moments and mean elimination time (MET) only for elimination processes based on [Formula: see text] was presented. The result of this work is also a new method of determining the half-life of elimination phase based on the MET value.

Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology

GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). The type A GABA receptor (GABA(A)R) system is the primary pharmacological target for many drugs used in clinical anesthesia. The α1, β2, and γ2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs located in the various parts of CNS are thought to be involved in versatile effects caused by inhaled anesthetics and classic benzodiazepines (BZD), both of which are widely used in clinical anesthesiology. During the past decade, the emergence of tonic inhibitory conductance in extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs has coincided with evidence showing that these receptors are highly sensitive to the sedatives and hypnotics used in anesthesia. Anesthetic enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition seems to be preferentially increased in regions shown to be important in controlling memory, awareness, and sleep. This review focuses on the physiology of the GABA(A)Rs and the pharmacological properties of clinically used BZDs. Although classic BZDs are widely used in anesthesiological practice, there is a constant need for new drugs with more favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and fewer side effects. New hypnotics are currently developed, and promising results for one of these, the GABA(A)R agonist remimazolam, have recently been published.

Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

We have studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil together with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Sixty patients (age 40-73 yr, 56 male) were assigned randomly to receive alfentanil, fentanyl or sufentanil and propofol. Plasma concentrations of these drugs and times for the plasma concentration to decrease by 50% (t50) and 80% (t80) after cessation of the infusion were determined. Times were recorded to awakening and tracheal extubation. Total dose and plasma concentrations of propofol were similar in all groups. Mean total doses of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil were 443, 45 and 4.4 micrograms kg-1, respectively. Time to awakening did not differ significantly. In patients receiving fentanyl, the trachea was extubated on average 2 h later than in those receiving sufentanil and 3 h later than in those receiving alfentanil (P < 0.05). The t80 of fentanyl was longer (P < 0.05) than that of alfentanil or sufentanil, and there was a linear correlation between the t80 of the opioid and the time to tracheal extubation (r = 0.51; P < 0.01). However, the t50 values for these opioids were similar and did not correlate with recovery time. In conclusion, patients undergoing CABG and who were anaesthetized with fentanyl and propofol needed mechanical ventilatory support for a significantly longer time than those receiving alfentanil or sufentanil and propofol. On the basis of the interindividual variation observed, the time to tracheal extubation was most predictable in patients receiving alfentanil and most variable in patients receiving fentanyl, a finding which may be important if the patients are transferred to a step-down unit on the evening of the operation.