New drugs for neuraxial blockade

Evaluation of the effects of ketamine on spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine

Spinal anesthesia or regional anesthesia is a potent anesthetic procedure. Additional modalities have been sought to increase the duration of block in spinal anesthesia. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blocker that has an anesthetic effect when injected intrathecally and has a synergic effect with bupivacaine. Ketamine also has potent analgesic properties. The present study investigated the effect of intrathecally administered ketamine on spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine or ropivacaine. Sprague-Dawley rats at post-natal day 21 were exposed to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine. Separate groups of rats were treated with intrathecal ketamine at a 5 or 10 mg/kg bodyweight dose along with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine. The thermal and mechanical withdrawal latencies of the animals were determined using hot plate and von Frey filaments, respectively. A rotarod apparatus was employed to assess the capacity of the rats to rotate the spindle at 24 h following anesthesia. The gait of the rat pups was also assessed. Intrathecal administration of ketamine resulted in dense blocks and extended the duration of spinal blocks as evidenced by thermal latencies and responses to von Frey filaments. The latency to fall was shorter in rats exposed to ketamine along with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia. The gait parameters were also more disturbed upon ketamine administration. In conclusion, ketamine administration with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine increased the intensity and duration of spinal blockade, thereby increasing the anesthetic effects.

Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia

Neuraxial drug administration describes techniques that deliver drugs in close proximity to the spinal cord, i.e. intrathecally into the CSF or epidurally into the fatty tissues surrounding the dura, by injection or infusion. This approach was initially developed in the form of spinal anaesthesia over 100 years ago. Since then, neuraxial drug administration has evolved and now includes a wide range of techniques to administer a large number of different drugs to provide anaesthesia, but also analgesia and treatment of spasticity in a variety of acute and chronic settings. This review concentrates on the pharmacological agents used and the clinical basis behind currently utilised approaches to neuraxial drug administration. With regard to local anaesthetics, the main focus is on the development of the enantiomer-specific compounds ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, which provide similar efficacy to bupivacaine with a reduced risk of severe cardiotoxicity. Opioids are the other group of drugs widely used neuraxially, in particular to provide analgesia alone or more commonly in combination with other agents. The physicochemical properties of the various opioids explain the main differences in efficacy and safety between these drugs when used intrathecally, of which morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil are most commonly used. Another group of drugs including clonidine, dexmedetomidine and epinephrine (adrenaline) provide neuraxial analgesia via alpha-adrenergic receptors and are used mainly as adjuvants to local anaesthetics and opioids. Furthermore, intrathecal baclofen is in routine clinical use to treat spasticity in a number of neurological conditions. Beside these established approaches, a wide range of other drugs have been assessed for neuraxial administration to provide analgesia; however, most are in various early stages of investigation and are not used routinely. These drugs include neostigmine, ketamine, midazolam and adenosine, and the conotoxin ziconotide. The latter is possibly the most unusual compound here; it has recently gained registration for intrathecal use in specific chronic pain conditions.

Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for surgery: still going strong?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The discussion on the value of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for surgery is fuelled by current controversies regarding effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality, potential benefits for outcome and the fear of rare, but catastrophic neurological complications. This review of the most recent publications on the topic since April 2002 illustrates some of the aspects contributing to the ongoing discussion.

RECENT FINDINGS

In contradiction to previous meta-analyses, recent trials could not demonstrate significant improvements of overall morbidity or mortality by epidural anaesthesia and analgesia. However, the technique was shown again to provide superior analgesia and a reduction of perioperative stress response and respiratory complications. Analysis of the current literature strongly supports that epidural anaesthesia and analgesia remains a safe practice with a low rate of severe complications, in particular in paediatric surgery. Several developments in equipment, techniques and especially drugs have been reported, resulting in improved balanced anaesthesia and analgesia and contributing to the safety of this technique.

SUMMARY

In an era of evidence-based medicine, further meta-analyses and well-planned large randomized trials have to address the controversial issues of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and postoperative outcome. In the context of a more holistic 'rehabilitative' management of the perioperative period, this technique might well represent a key factor to improve outcome, reduce hospital stay and thereby healthcare costs. Recent innovations and developments in techniques and drugs as well as established guidelines should further minimize potential errors and harmful complications.