To transfuse or not in trauma patients: a presentation of the evidence and rationale

Trauma and critical care III: chest trauma

Patients requiring intensive care for chest trauma are often severely injured and may have suffered trauma elsewhere. The single largest cause of significant blunt chest trauma is road traffic accidents (RTAs). RTAs account for 70-80% of such injuries. Falls and acts of violence are other causative mechanisms. Blast injuries can also result in significant blunt thoracic trauma. Penetrating chest trauma comprises a broad spectrum of injuries and severity. Particular challenges occur in patients with associated polytrauma, as well as those with a combination of blunt and penetrating chest trauma. Chest injury is the most important injury in polytrauma patients with reported incidences of 45-65% and an associated mortality of up to 60%. The treatment of these patients can be prolonged and the initial injury may become of secondary importance to the effects of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute lung injury (ALI), nosocomial infection and intercurrent multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Multiply-injured patients with thoracic injuries require significantly longer periods of mechanical ventilation and longer intensive care unit lengths of stay compared with nonthoracic injury trauma patients. The use of a variety of therapeutic interventions may have to be considered during management of the disease process.

Operational critical care. Intensive care and trauma

Trauma management involves good prehospital, emergency, surgical, anaesthetic and intensive care decision-making. Optimal outcome depends on keeping abreast of the latest thinking in an ever-changing and increasingly technology-rich environment. The intensive care unit needs to represented as early as possible in the damage-control resuscitation phase. Improved trauma system care has resulted in an increasing number of multiply injured military patients surviving their initial trauma. These patients require intensive care and are at risk from sepsis and multiple organ failure. Attention to detail is important, preservation of organ function, infection control and nutrition to maintain muscle strength allowing normal metabolic function to return. Multiply injured patients often require lengthy periods of mechanical ventilation and a variety of therapeutic interventions may have to be considered during management of the disease process. As we are now seeing more survivors in the military trauma system the focus now needs to be morbidity reduction in order for these survivors to be best prepared for their rehabilitation phase of care.

[Blood replacement in severely injured patients]

Haemorrhage remains a leading cause of early death in injured and application of concentrated RBC transfusion in the treatment of multiple injuries is the basis and potential component of saving lives. The aim of this study was to analyze the received amount reimbursed blood in patients with severe trauma, depending on the outcome, severity and mechanism of injury. Collected data on gender, age and age as the mechanism of injury, amount of blood recovered intraoperatively and during the first six days of hospitalization, which were analyzed according to outcome of treatment, ISS, AIS, and APACHE II score. Results showed that patients with lethal outcome received a larger amount of blood, there is a statistically significant correlation with ISS and AIS score for extremity injuries, and that larger amount of blood received patients injured in the traffic accidents, as pedestrians and motorcycle riders/bike, and there is no correlation with APACHE II score. Based on the importance of this topic for further research are necessary in this area in order to more accurately define indications and dosage and method of reimbursement of blood in patient with severe trauma.

Changes in transfusion practice in multiple injury between 1993 and 2006: a retrospective analysis on 5389 patients from the German Trauma Registry

To evaluate transfusion practices in multiple injured patients and to demonstrate changes in the pattern of packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions over the last one-and-half decade (1993-2006). A retrospective analysis using the German Trauma Registry database (DGU-Traumaregister) including 29 353 multiple injured patients was conducted. The study population included primary admissions presenting to the emergency room (ER) with clinical and laboratory signs of active haemorrhage [haemoglobin < 9 g x dL(-1), platelets < 90000 xmicroL(-1) and prothrombin time (Quick-value) < 60%]. The pattern of pRBC transfusions was followed from ER to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A total of 5389 patients with complete data sets were divided into the following three groups according to the year of treatment and analysed: (a) group 1: 1993-1998 (n = 870), (b) group 2: 1999-2002 (n = 2044) and (c) group 3: 2003-2006 (n = 2475). Patients had a mean age of 40.5 (+/-20) years and were predominantly male (67.2%). All patients were substantially injured (mean injury severity score = 32 +/- 15.5) and in 93% the mechanism of injury was blunt. The percentage of patients who received pRBC transfusions between ER and ICU dropped from 72% in 1993-1998 to 54% in 2003-2006 (P < 0.005). Similarly, the percentage of patients receiving mass transfusions (> 10 pRBC units) dropped from 51.3 to 17.1%. This decline was accompanied by lower incidence rates for septic complications, ventilator days, ICU length-of-stay and mortality. pRBC transfusion practices in acute trauma care have changed substantially over the last one-and-half decade and were associated with better outcome.