Interventional catheterization

Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery versus catheter-based device occlusion for atrial septal defects in adults: reconsideration of the standard of care

Objectives

Percutaneous ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD II) closure has become the standard of care for treatment of congenital ASD II in adults. Nevertheless, patients are frequently ineligible for this technique due to challenging morphology. In such cases, closure via minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is an appropriate treatment option. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of MICS and use of a percutaneous Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) device for treatment of ASD II in adults.

Methods

From July 2002 to June 2014, 95 patients underwent MICS for congenital ASD II closure. During the same period, 169 patients underwent ASO procedure. Outcomes in terms of remaining ASD II, new onset atrial fibrillation (AF), post-interventional stroke, myocardial infarction and the post procedural implementation of anticoagulation were compared.

Results

Apart from age (38.3 ± 12.7 vs 49.6 ± 15.7 years, P  < 0.0001) the groups did not differ in baseline characteristics. A significantly higher rate of residual ASD II was found in the ASO group at 3 months (0% vs 30.8%, P  < 0.0001), 6 months (0% vs 15.9%, P  < 0.0001) and 12 months follow-up (0% vs 7.1%, P  = 0.005). A significantly higher rate of new-onset AF was seen in the ASO group (0% vs 9.5%, P  = 0.0008).

Conclusions

MICS for ASD II is a safe and reproducible procedure with 0% mortality in our cohort. More complete closure of ASD, decreased rates of new onset AF and decreased need for oral anticoagulation are the advantages of the MICS procedure. Compared with the current standard of care, the MICS approach is feasible regardless of ASD morphology.

Peratrial Closure of Atrial Septal Defects without Cardiopulmonary Bypass

The objective of this study was to introduce a new technique for occlusion of an atrial septal defect without cardiopulmonary bypass, using a modified Amplatzer device. Between October 2004 and November 2005, 96 secundum atrial septal defects in 83 patients were occluded by this method. A 3-cm incision in the right 4th intercostal space and a minithoracotomy were performed. Via this incision, the right atrium was exposed and the septal closure device was deployed under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. The sizes of the defects ranged from 10 to 39 mm. The mean device size was 34.1 ± 9 mm (12–46 mm). There was no operative mortality and no major morbidity on follow-up of 3–15 months. This new minimally invasive method of secundum atrial septal defect closure is safe and cosmetically superior to conventional surgery. Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass can reduce recovery time and complications. The indications are more extensive than percutaneous transcatheter closure, and the results are encouraging.

Surgical atrial septal defect closure after interventional occluder placement: Incidence and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects is generally performed by using an interventional approach. We evaluated the outcome of patients requiring secondary surgical therapy.

METHODS

From September 1996 until December, 2005, 418 patients received interventional and 297 patients underwent surgical closure of an ostium secundum atrial septal defect at our center. Another 15 patients (local, 5; regional, 5; and national, 5 referrals) had complications after occluder placement, and they form the study population.

RESULTS

Indications for surgical repair in these 15 patients were dislocation of the occluder in 5, neurologic events after occluder placement in 5, residual defects in 4, and sepsis with questionable occluder infection in 1 patient. A total of 7 patients had neurologic events, 5 of embolic origin. The interval between interventional occluder placement and definitive surgical repair was 319 +/- 416 days (median 123 days; range 0-1395 days). Patient age at operation was 34.9 +/- 18.6 years. Nine patients were operated on via an anterolateral minithoracotomy, and 6 received a conventional sternotomy. One patient with sepsis underwent abdominal surgery on postoperative day 1 and subsequently died of multiorgan failure; there was no proof of occluder endocarditis. At 2.2 +/- 1.9 years of follow-up, all other patients had returned to full-time work without residual neurologic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications may arise after interventional ostium secundum atrial septal defect closure. This must be evaluated against the extremely low risk of a standard surgical closure. The functional outcome after secondary surgical ostium secundum atrial septal defect closure with removal of an occluder system is excellent.

New Minimally Invasive Technique to Occlude Secundum Atrial Septal Defect in 53 Patients

BACKGROUND

Conventional surgical atrial septal defect (ASD) closure requires cardiopulmonary bypass, whereas percutaneous transcatheter closure is limited by maximal defect size of 34 mm and access to the neck. We describe a new minimally invasive approach using a right minithoracotomy to deploy an occluder without cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

Between October 2004 and April 2005, 53 secundum ASDs were closed by this method. Through a 3-cm incision in the right fourth intercostal space, a minithoracotomy exposes the right atrium to facilitate deployment of the septal closure device. The age of the patients was from 2 to 61 years. The ASD size was 12 to 39 mm.

RESULTS

All ASDs were successfully closed with a mean device size of 33.1 +/- 8 mm (range, 16 to 46 mm). The procedure duration was 30 to 60 minutes. All patients were extubated on table, with less than a 1-day stay in the intensive care unit. The hospital stay was 3 to 7 days. There was no postoperative mortality. At mean follow-up of 1 to 8 months, there were no major morbidities. One patient had minimal residual shunt that resolved 1 month later.

CONCLUSIONS

This new minimally invasive method of secundum ASD closure is safe and cosmetically superior to conventional surgery. Early results are encouraging.

Secundum ASD closure using a right lateral minithoracotomy: five-year experience in 122 patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is a standard procedure associated with very low mortality and morbidity. We evaluated outcomes in the era of catheter-based interventional closure and minimally invasive techniques.

METHODS

From May 1996, February 2002, 177 patients with a body weight of more than 30 kg underwent surgical ASD closure. A right lateral minithoracotomy (LMT) was used in 122 patients and a conventional approach, in 55. Diagnoses included secundum ASD in 106 patients in the LMT group and 40 in the conventional group, sinus venosus ASD in 13 patients in each group, and status post interventional closure in 3 and 2 patients, respectively. Mean age was 37 +/- 17 years in the LMT group and 43 +/- 20 years, in the conventional group and mean body weight was 66 +/- 17 kg and 70 +/- 16 kg, respectively. In the LMT group, femoral cannulation was performed for cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Direct ASD closure was carried out in 67.2% of patients in the LMT group and 58.2% of those in the conventional group. The remaining patients had pericardial patch closure. There was one death: A patient in the conventional group who required explantation of an Amplatzer device because of infection died postoperatively. Average stay in the intensive care unit was 1.2 +/- 0.5 days. Two patients required reoperation for residual ASD after direct closure; 1 sustained a temporary neurological deficit that resolved completely. On postoperative echocardiography, a minimal residual shunt was seen in only 3 patients. All patients were in good clinical condition with improved functional status at discharge from the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Secundum ASD closure by LMT has become as standard and safe an operation as the conventional technique and achieves good perioperative results and satisfactory long-term outcomes. Thus LMT is an attractive option for patients who are not suitable for closure using catheter-based devices.