Recent advances in small-bowel imaging: a review

Emergency Medicine Evaluation and Management of Small Bowel Obstruction: Evidence-Based Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a commonly diagnosed disease in the emergency department (ED). Recent literature has evaluated the ED investigation and management of SBO.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates the ED investigation and management of adult SBO based on the current literature.

DISCUSSION

SBO is most commonly due to occlusion of the small intestine, resulting in fluid and gas accumulation. This may progress to mucosal ischemia, necrosis, and perforation. A variety of etiologies are present, but in adults, adhesions are the most common cause. Several classification systems are present. However, the most important distinction is complete vs. partial and complicated vs. simple obstruction, as complete complicated SBO more commonly requires surgical intervention. History and physical examination can vary, but the most reliable findings include prior abdominal surgery, history of constipation, abdominal distension, and abnormal bowel sounds. Signs of strangulation include fever, hypotension, diffuse abdominal pain, peritonitis, and several others. Diagnosis typically requires imaging, and though plain radiographs are often ordered, they cannot exclude the diagnosis. Computed tomography and ultrasound are reliable diagnostic methods. Management includes intravenous fluid resuscitation, analgesia, and determining need for operative vs. nonoperative therapy. Nasogastric tube is useful for patients with significant distension and vomiting by removing contents proximal to the site of obstruction. Surgery is needed for strangulation and those that fail nonoperative therapy. Surgical service evaluation and admission are recommended.

CONCLUSION

SBO is a common reason for admission from the ED. Knowledge of recent literature can optimize diagnosis and management.

Umbilical cord anomalies: antenatal ultrasound findings and postnatal correlation

Umbilical cord anomalies are rare. The differential diagnosis for a cystic structure around the umbilical cord and its insertion include pseudocyst, omphalomesenteric duct cyst, haemangioma, omphalocele or anterior abdominal wall defects. Although cord anomalies can be detected through antenatal ultrasound scans (US), very often a definitive diagnosis cannot be made. This may affect the management of the infant at birth. In cases where antenatal US was not diagnostic, current evidence supports the use of MRI to help in making an accurate diagnosis. We report two cases of umbilical cord anomalies. The first case was diagnosed in antenatal US as an omphalocele, but was found to be an allantoic cyst with hamartoma on postnatal diagnosis. The second case was not detected on antenatal US, and was diagnosed postnatally as a small omphalocele with vitellointestinal duct remnants.

Abdominal CT findings may suggest coeliac disease

BACKGROUND

Coeliac disease is the most common gastrointestinal immunological disorder in the western countries. Many adult patients present non-specific symptoms and signs of malabsorption such as chronic diarrhoea, anaemia, weight loss and abdominal distention. In non-specific and doubtful conditions, computed tomography is often the first medical examination performed. In a clinical practice, a critical review of computed tomography signs is therefore mandatory.

AIMS

To evaluate the abdominal computed tomography findings, which are useful to suggest the presence of coeliac disease in adult patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The computed tomography studies of 28 coeliac patients were reviewed, looking for any intestinal and extraintestinal abnormality. The computed tomography findings evaluated were: abnormalities of intestinal fold pattern, bowel dilatation, fluid and air excess, duodenal abnormalities, intestinal intussusception, bowel wall thickening, lymphadenopathy, ascites, intestinal stenosis, mesenteric vascular changes. The abdominal computed tomography of a group of 30 normal subjects was also analysed.

RESULTS

Intestinal fold pattern abnormalities were seen in 23/28 patients. Intestinal dilatation was seen in 21/28. Fluid excess in 18/28 and lymphadenopathy was seen in 12/28 patients; engorgement of mesenteric vessels in 7/28. Bowel wall thickening was observed in 6/28 patients and transient intussusception was observed in 6/28 patients. Increased air content within the bowel in 4/28 and ascites in 2/28 patients. Bowel dilatation together with fluid excess was observed in 18/28 patients. None of the above mentioned abnormalities abnormalities were seen in normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Data of the present study show that several abdominal computed tomography findings may be seen in coeliac adult patients; these findings should be taken into consideration with a high in level of suspicion by radiologists, to avoid diagnostic delay and unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.