Prevention of urinary and anal incontinence: role of elective cesarean delivery

The Role of Obstetric Factors, miRNA-30d and miRNA-181a in Postpartum Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Background

The diagnosis of postpartum pelvic organ prolapse (POP) relies on symptoms combined with pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) and lacks serological indicators. The objective of this study was to assess serum elastin, type I collagen, miRNA-30d, and miRNA-181a in the early postpartum period to identify hematologic predictors of POP.

Material and Methods

The study included 1013 42- to 60-day-postpartum women who had delivered at Quanzhou Women's and Children's Hospital from October 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The pregnancy and childbirth characteristics and pelvic floor function were evaluated. Forty cases with and without POP were matched, and serum elastin and type I collagen were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect miRNA-30d and miRNA-181a in 15 pairs.

Results

Of the 1013 women recruited, 699 (69.00%) were diagnosed with POP. The mean age was 29.00 years old, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.6 kg/m². In the univariate analysis, age ≥35 years (OR, 1.449; 95% CI, 0.965, 2.298), postpartum BMI ≥ 24 (OR, 4.402; 95% CI, 2.657, 6.148), neonatal weight ≥4 kg (OR, 4.832; 95% CI, 1.373, 17.290) and vaginal delivery (OR, 2.751; 95% CI, 1.855, 4.081) were risk factors for postpartum POP. There were no significant differences in the concentrations of serum elastin and type I collagen between the groups (P=0.52; P=0.26). There were significant differences in the concentrations of miRNA-30d and miRNA-181a between the groups (P=0.004; P=0.003).

Conclusion

miRNA-30d and miRNA-181a tended to be increased in women with POP and could be potential clinical predictors.

Anal incontinence after caesarean and vaginal delivery in Sweden: a national population-based study

BACKGROUND

Elective caesarean delivery is increasing rapidly in many countries, and one of the reasons might be that caesarean delivery is widely believed to protect against pelvic floor disorders, including anal incontinence. Previous studies on this issue have been small and with conflicting results. The aim of present study was to compare the risk of developing anal incontinence in women who had a caesarean delivery, in those who had a vaginal delivery, and in two age-matched control groups (nulliparous women and men).

METHODS

In this observational population-based study, we included all women in the Swedish Medical Birth Register who gave birth by caesarean delivery or vaginal delivery during 1973-2015 in Sweden and were diagnosed with anal incontinence according to ICD 8-10 in the Swedish National Patient Register during 2001-15. Exclusion criteria were multiple birth delivery, mixed vaginal and caesarean delivery, and four or more deliveries. We compared the diagnosis of anal incontinence between women previously delivered solely by caesarean delivery and those who solely had delivered vaginally. We also compared it with two age-matched control groups of nulliparous women and men from the Swedish Total Population Register. Finally, we analysed risk factors for anal incontinence in the caesarean delivery and vaginal delivery groups.

FINDINGS

3 755 110 individuals were included in the study. Between 1973 and 2015, 185 219 women had a caesarean delivery only and 1 400 935 delivered vaginally only. 416 (0·22 %) of the 185 219 women in the caesarean delivery group were diagnosed with anal incontinence compared with 5171 (0·37%) of 1 400 935 women in the vaginal delivery group. The odds ratio (OR) for being diagnosed with anal incontinence after vaginal delivery compared with caesarean delivery was 1·65 (95% CI 1·49-1·82; p<0·0001). When the combination vaginal delivery and caesarean delivery was compared with the nulliparous control group, the OR of being diagnosed with anal incontinence was 2·05 (1·92-2·19; p<0·0001). For the nulliparous women compared with men, the OR for anal incontinence was 1·89 (1·75-2·05; p<0·0001). The strongest risk factors for anal incontinence after vaginal delivery were high maternal age, high birthweight of the child, and instrumental delivery. The only risk factor for anal incontinence after caesarean delivery was maternal age.

INTERPRETATION

The risk of developing anal incontinence increases after pregnancy and delivery. Women with known risk factors for anal incontinence should perhaps be offered a more qualified post-partum examination to enable early intervention in case of injury. Further knowledge for optimal management are needed.

FUNDING

County Council of Jämtland.

The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery

AIM

An association was recently reported between a low cesarean section delivery rate and a method of obstetrical care that involved the frequent use of risk-guided prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction. We sought to confirm this finding in a subsequent group of pregnant women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study design was used to compare the outcomes of 100 consecutively delivered women, who were exposed to the alternative method of care, with the outcomes of 300 randomly chosen women who received standard management. The primary outcome was group cesarean delivery rate. Secondary outcomes were rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission, low 1-minute Apgar score, low 5-minute Apgar score, and major perineal trauma.

RESULTS

Women exposed to the alternative method of obstetrical care had a higher induction rate (59% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001), a more frequent use of prostaglandins for cervical ripening (32% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), and a lower cesarean delivery rate (7% vs. 20.3%, p = 0.002). Exposed women did not experience higher rates of other adverse birth outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to an alternative method of obstetrical care that used high levels of risk-driven prostaglandin-assisted labor was again associated with two findings: a lower group cesarean delivery rate and no increases in levels of other adverse birth outcomes. An adequately powered randomized controlled trial is needed to further explore this alternative method of care.

Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether exposure of nulliparous women to a high rate of preventive labor induction was associated with improvement in birth health.

STUDY DESIGN

A risk-scoring system was used to guide the frequent use of preventive labor induction in 100 nulliparous women. The birth outcomes of this group were compared with those of 352 nulliparous women who received usual care. Cesarean delivery was the primary study outcome. The Adverse Outcome Index and the rate of uncomplicated vaginal delivery were used to measure overall birth health.

RESULTS

The exposed group experienced a higher labor induction rate (48% vs 23.6%; P < .001), a lower cesarean rate (9% vs 25.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.36; P = .02), and better composite birth outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Exposure of nulliparous women to a high preventive induction rate was significantly associated with improvement in birth health. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further explore the utility of risk-guided preventive labor induction.

The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare birth outcomes that result from the active management of risk in pregnancy at term (AMOR-IPAT) to those outcomes that result from standard management.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized clinical trial with 270 women of mixed parity. AMOR-IPAT used preventive labor induction to ensure delivery before the end of an estimated optimal time of delivery. Rates of 4 adverse obstetric events and 2 composite measures were used to evaluate birth outcomes.

RESULTS

The AMOR-IPAT-exposed group had a similar cesarean delivery rate (10.3% vs 14.9%; P = .25), but a lower neonatal intensive care unit admission rate (1.5% vs 6.7%; P = .03), a higher uncomplicated vaginal birth rate (73.5% vs 62.8%; P = .046), and a lower mean Adverse Outcome Index score (1.4 vs 8.6; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

AMOR-IPAT exposure improved the pattern of birth outcomes. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to explore further the impact of AMOR-IPAT on birth outcomes and to determine the best methods of preventive labor induction.

Factors associated with postpartum urinary/anal incontinence in primiparous women in Quebec

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors associated with urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI), and combined UI and AI (UI/AI) in primiparous women in Quebec at six months postpartum.

METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed to 2492 primiparous women at six months postpartum to collect data on incontinence status, sociodemographic characteristics, elimination habits, lifestyle, and severity index scales. Obstetric characteristics were obtained via Quebec's Med-Echo databank. Pearson chi-square, t test, analysis of variance, univariate regression, and stepwise modelling techniques were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of UI in responders was 29.6%, of AI, 20.6%, and of combined UI/AI, 10.4%. Significant adjusted odds ratios were (1) for UI, English spoken (2.04 [95% confidence intervals 1.13-3.69]) and shoulder dystocia (2.90 [1.09-7.69]); (2) for AI, age > 35 years (2.13 [1.12-4.03]), duration of second stage of labour (1.67 [1.11-2.51]), and third or fourth degree tears (4.00 [2.32-6.89]); and (3) for UI and AI, age (2.00 [1.04-3.83]), English spoken (2.55 [1.25-5.19]), shoulder dystocia (4.91 [1.76-13.71]), instrumental delivery (2.28 [1.30-3.99]), third or fourth degree tears (3.58 [1.95-6.57]), and episiotomy (2.24 [1.162-4.33]). Caesarean section was associated with less UI (0.45 [0.28-0.72]), and smoking was associated with less AI (0.38 [0.19-0.76]).

CONCLUSION

Combined UI/AI is associated with several obstetrical factors. The association of UI and AI is observed more frequently after complicated delivery (requiring the application of forceps) or involving perineal damage and episiotomy. As most of the identified factors are modifiable, a preventive treatment policy is advisable.

A urogynecologist's view ofthe pelvic floor effects of vaginal delivery/cesarean section for the urologist

Pregnancy and parturition have been implicated in the development of pelvic floor dysfunction. These disorders include urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and other pelvic and sexual dysfunctions. The urologist caring for women with urinary dysfunction needs to be familiar with the causes of pelvic floor dysfunction and their implications. Defects of the pelvic floor have clearly resulted from the traumatic effect of vaginal delivery. The likely mechanisms of injuries during vaginal delivery involve stretching and compression of the pudendal nerve and peripheral branches, as well as an additional tearing of muscles and connective tissue. Optimal management of labor and optimal techniques of repair of unavoidable sphincteric lacerations, ante- and postpartum pelvic floor muscle conditioning, and timely and proper indications for cesarean delivery will minimize the effect of incidental traumatic delivery.

Fecal Incontinence: a woman's view

Fecal incontinence (FI) has a prevalence of 2-7% in the general community and increases substantially in hospitalized patients and nursing home residents. Incontinent patients often isolate themselves from society for fear of having an incontinent episode in public. Few of these patients ever discuss this ailment with their doctor, despite a significant increase in depression and anxiety. Women have gender-specific medical and surgical conditions that predispose them to FI such as pregnancy, scleroderma, MS, IBS, childbirth, and pelvic surgeries. This article will address multiple facets of FI, but will focus specifically on issues related to women.

Postpartum evaluation of stress urinary incontinence among primiparas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of postpartum stress urinary incontinence (SUI); the relationship between postpartum SUI and mode of delivery; and the association between SUI and other obstetric factors.

METHOD

In this prospective study, 1000 primiparas with no history of UI were recruited and followed up for 4 months after delivery. The chi(2) and Fisher's Exact tests were used to calculate the effects of the nominal variables.

RESULT

The prevalence of postpartum SUI was 14.1%, and the mode of delivery was significantly associated with SUI. The prevalence rates were 15.9% after vaginal delivery, 10.7% after elective cesarean section (CS), and 25% after CS performed for obstructed labor. The prevalence of postpartum SUI was similar following spontaneous vaginal delivery and CS performed for obstructed labor (P=.21). Meanwhile, elective CS with no trial of labor was found to be associated with a significantly lower prevalence of postpartum SUI (P=.01; chi(2)=12.42). A maternal body mass index greater than 30 before pregnancy and fetal weight higher than 3000 g appeared to be associated with an increased rate of SUI (P=.001; chi(2)=17.6 and P=.000; chi(2)=22.5, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Elective CS significantly reduced the rate of postpartum SUI.

Childbirth and pelvic floor dysfunction: an epidemiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportunities at delivery

Female pelvic floor dysfunction is integral to the woman's role in the reproductive process, largely because of the unique anatomic features that facilitate vaginal birth and also because of the trauma that can occur during that event. Interventions such as primary elective cesarean delivery have been discussed for the primary prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction; however, existing data about potentially causal factors limit our ability to evaluate such strategies critically. Here we consider the conceptual principles of epidemiologic function and the availability of data that are necessary to make informed recommendations about prevention opportunities for pelvic floor dysfunction at delivery. Available epidemiologic data on pelvic floor dysfunction suggest that there may be substantial opportunities for the primary prevention of pelvic organ prolapse at delivery. Although definitive recommendations await further epidemiologic studies of the potential risk and benefits of obstetric practice change, it is hoped that this discussion will provide a novel, quantitative framework for the assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction prevention opportunities.

Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review

Primary elective cesarean performed on a patient's request now comprises 4% to 18% of all cesareans and 14% to 22% of elective cesareans in reported series. Patients most commonly choose cesarean because of tocophobia, or fear of childbirth. Almost two thirds of obstetricians surveyed are willing to perform cesarean on request, citing decreased risk of pelvic floor or fetal injury, maintenance of sexual functioning, and physician and patient convenience. Contrasting these beliefs are the limited available data on short- and long-term maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality that generally favor vaginal delivery. Moreover, comprehensive economic impact assessments of cesarean on request are lacking, and professional organizations do not agree on the ethics of offering patient choice cesarean.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to list the reasons that women and obstetricians choose elective cesarean delivery, to outline the ethical aspects of cesarean delivery, and to describe the material and fetal morbidity and mortality associated with cesarean delivery compared to vaginal delivery.