Has the Quick or the Owren prothrombin time method the advantage in harmonization for the International Normalized Ratio system?

Interference in point-of-care international normalized ratio monitoring in patients with lupus anticoagulant is correlated with anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody titers

Background

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) receive anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent recurrent thrombosis. VKA treatment requires strict monitoring with an international normalized ratio (INR). It is known that lupus anticoagulants (LAs) can lead to elevated INR results with point-of-care-testing (POCT) devices, which could result in inadequate adaptation of anticoagulant therapy.

Objective

To determine discrepancies between POCT-INR and laboratory-INR in patients who are LA-positive on VKA therapy.

Methods

Paired INR testing was performed with 1 POCT device (CoaguChek XS) and 2 laboratory assays (Owren and Quick method) in 33 patients with LA-positive APS on VKA in a single-center cross-sectional study. Patients were tested for anti-β2-glycoprotein I, anticardiolipin, and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM antibodies. Agreement between assays was evaluated with Spearman's correlation, Lin's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plots. Agreement limits were considered satisfactory if differences were ≤20% as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Results

We found poor agreement between POCT-INR and laboratory-INR based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρ_c) of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26-0.55) between POCT-INR and Owren-INR, a ρ_c of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47-0.76) between POCT-INR and Quick-INR, and a ρ_c of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) between Quick-INR and Owren-INR. High anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG antibody titers correlated with INR disagreement between POCT-INR and laboratory-INR.

Conclusion

There is a disagreement between INR values measured with the CoaguChek XS and laboratory-INR in a proportion of patients with LA. Consequently, laboratory-INR monitoring should be preferred over POCT-INR monitoring in patients with LA-positive APS, especially in patients with high anti-β2-glycoprotein IgG antibody titers.

Reappraising the concept of massive transfusion in trauma

INTRODUCTION

The massive-transfusion concept was introduced to recognize the dilutional complications resulting from large volumes of packed red blood cells (PRBCs). Definitions of massive transfusion vary and lack supporting clinical evidence. Damage-control resuscitation regimens of modern trauma care are targeted to the early correction of acute traumatic coagulopathy. The aim of this study was to identify a clinically relevant definition of trauma massive transfusion based on clinical outcomes. We also examined whether the concept was useful in that early prediction of massive transfusion requirements could allow early activation of blood bank protocols.

METHODS

Datasets on trauma admissions over a 1 or 2-year period were obtained from the trauma registries of five large trauma research networks. A fractional polynomial was used to model the transfusion-associated probability of death. A logistic regression model for the prediction of massive transfusion, defined as 10 or more units of red cell transfusions, was developed.

RESULTS

In total, 5,693 patient records were available for analysis. Mortality increased as transfusion requirements increased, but the model indicated no threshold effect. Mortality was 9% in patients who received none to five PRBC units, 22% in patients receiving six to nine PRBC units, and 42% in patients receiving 10 or more units. A logistic model for prediction of massive transfusion was developed and validated at multiple sites but achieved only moderate performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81, with specificity of only 50% at a sensitivity of 90% for the prediction of 10 or more PRBC units. Performance varied widely at different trauma centers, with specificity varying from 48% to 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

No threshold for definition exists at which a massive transfusion specifically results in worse outcomes. Even with a large sample size across multiple trauma datasets, it was not possible to develop a transportable and clinically useful prediction model based on available admission parameters. Massive transfusion as a concept in trauma has limited utility, and emphasis should be placed on identifying patients with massive hemorrhage and acute traumatic coagulopathy.

External quality assessment of prothrombin time: The split‐sample model compared with external quality assessment with commercial control material

OBJECTIVE

CoaguChek S is a point-of-care, whole-blood, prothrombin time monitor. The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods for external quality assessments of CoaguChek S.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the traditional external quality assessment scheme, commercial control material was sent to office laboratories and the results were compared with a method-specific target value. In the alternative external quality assessment (the split-sample survey) patient samples were analyzed on CoaguChek S at office laboratories, and venous blood samples from the same patients were analyzed at a hospital laboratory using an assigned comparison method. To obtain comparable performance criteria for the two methods, the limits for "good", "acceptable" and "poor" performance evaluation in the split-sample survey had to be expanded because of uncertainties in preanalytical factors and the comparison method.

RESULTS

In the traditional external quality assessment the total imprecision (between-office and within-office) was 8.0% at the low level (1.6 INR (International Normalized Ratio)) and 10.5% at the therapeutic level (3.4 INR). In the split-sample survey the total imprecision was 12.3% at the low level (2.1 INR) and 10.7 % at the high level (3.0 INR). Seventy-five percent of the participating office laboratories were characterized as "good" with the traditional external quality assessments, whereas the corresponding number was 73% using the split-sample model.

CONCLUSIONS

Available commercial control material for CoaguChek S is different from patient samples. This study demonstrates that split-sample survey is achievable, and is an acceptable alternative to traditional external quality assessment for point-of-care prothrombin time monitors where appropriate control material is difficult to obtain.

Plasma predilution with addition of depleted plasma in a prothrombin time reagent improves the agreement between different prothrombin time methods

BACKGROUND

The Quick (plain thromboplastins) and Owren (combined thromboplastins, with the addition of bovine plasma with vitamin K-dependent factors depleted) prothrombin time (PT) methods are used for measuring prothrombin time; for instance, in monitoring anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists. In most Quick PT methods, the final plasma dilution is 1/3 compared to Owren methods, which have a final dilution of 1/21. The Quick PT methods are associated with larger inter-laboratory variations than the Owren PT methods.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether dilution of the sample or thromboplastin has any impact on the correlation between the different PT methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plasma samples were analysed undiluted and prediluted in buffer, with adsorbed bovine plasma added, and by using rabbit brain or human placenta thromboplastins. Bootstrapping (re-sampling) was utilized to estimate the difference in correlations between PT of different reagents at different dilutions of plasma.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We found the best correlations for combined reagents when the sample was prediluted 7-fold (r = 0.95) or more, and lowest when the sample was undiluted (r = 0.67). The source of thromboplastin had only a minor impact, if any, on the PT results. It was impossible to test whether predilution of plasma samples improved the correlation between Quick PT methods due to absence of clotting in many samples. We suggest that the Owren-style sample predilution is preferable for the harmonization of PT results and to overcome the large inter-laboratory variations that are associated with Quick PT methods to the benefit of patients on oral anticoagulation.

Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin time (PT) has long been the most popular test for monitoring oral anticoagulation therapy. The International Normalized Ratio (INR) was introduced to overcome the problem of marked variation in PT results among laboratories and the various recommendations for patient care. According to this principle, all reagents should be calibrated to give identical results and the same patient care globally. This is necessary for monitoring of single patients and for application of the results of anticoagulation trials and guidelines to clinical practice.

METHODS

We took blood samples from 150 patients for whom oral anticoagulation had been prescribed. Plasmas were separated and PTs determined by use of seven commercial reagents and four calibrator sets. The differences in results were assessed by plotting, for each possible pair of methods, the differences in INR values for each sample against the mean INR value (Bland-Altman difference plots).

RESULTS

Mean results differed significantly (P <0.001) for 17 of 21 possible paired comparisons of methods. Only two pairs of methods produced very similar results when assessed for problems of substantial differences in INR values; a significant, systematic increase in the difference with INR; and a significant systematic increase in the variation in difference with increasing INR values.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement among several (and perhaps most) commercial INR methods is poor. The failure of current calibration strategies may severely compromise both the monitoring of individual patients and the application of oral anticoagulation guidelines and trial results to clinical practice.