Combined effects of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation inhibition but not thrombin generation inhibition

The aim of our study was to investigate the combined in vitro effects of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation and thrombin generation under low and high coagulant challenge in tissue-factor-activated, platelet-rich plasma. Increasing amounts of melagatran dose-dependently decreased prothrombin fragment 1.2 and activated factor X values, and dose-dependently prolonged the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation. Eptifibatide exerted a dose-dependent anti-aggregating effect under both high and low coagulant challenge. The combination of melagatran and eptifibatide resulted in significant additive prolongation of the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation, which was more pronounced under low coagulant challenge. Under low, but not under high, coagulant challenge, the combination of melagatran and eptifibatide had a significant additive inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation. No additive effects on decreasing prothrombin fragment 1.2 and activated factor X values were observed with combined administration of the drugs. The present study demonstrates the additive effect of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation inhibition and on prolongation of the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors in clinical development

Thrombin has long been a target for development of oral anticoagulants but it has been difficult to find synthetic inhibitors with a desirable combination of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. However, there are now two oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in clinical development, ximelagatran (ExantaTM) and BIBR 1048. Both are prodrugs with two protecting groups that are eliminated after absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Their main active substances, melagatran and BIBR 953, are both potent and selective DTIs. In experimental models of thrombosis, melagatran has been shown to have a shallower dose-response curve than warfarin and, therefore, a better separation between efficacy and bleeding. Oral bioavailability, measured as the plasma concentration of the active metabolite, seems to be higher for ximelagatran (20%) than for BIBR 1048 (estimated to 5%). BIBR 953 has a longer half-life (about 12 h) than does melagatran (3-5 h) after oral administration of BIBR 1048 and ximelagatran, respectively. Both melagatran and BIBR 953 are mainly eliminated via the renal route. The variability of the plasma concentration of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran is low. There are no clinically relevant interactions with food or cytochrome P450 metabolized drugs and ximelagatran. In clinical studies, ximelagatran has been administered in a twice-daily fixed-dose regimen without coagulation monitoring. Results of published clinical studies are encouraging, both with regard to efficacy and bleeding. Major indications in Phase III studies with ximelagatran are the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hip and knee replacement surgery, treatment and long-term secondary prevention of VTE and prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It is anticipated that with a favourable outcome of the Phase III clinical studies new oral DTIs, with the oral fixed-dose regimen without routine coagulation monitoring, will ease the use of today's anticoagulant therapy.