Interferon-alpha and 13-cis-retinoic acid as maintenance therapy after high-dose combination chemotherapy with growth factor support for small cell lung cancer--a feasibility study

[Immune Characteristics of Small Cell Lung Cancer]

小细胞肺癌（small cell lung cancer, SCLC）是预后极差的一类肿瘤，30年来药物治疗无显著进展，免疫检查点抑制剂（immune checkpoint inhibitor, ICI）成为近年唯一突破：程序性死亡-1（programmed death-1, PD-1）抑制剂单药或联合细胞毒T淋巴细胞抗原-4（cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, CTLA-4）抑制剂后线治疗SCLC的有效率为10%-33%，有效时间较持久；程序性死亡配体-1（programmed death ligand-1, PD-L1）抑制剂联合化疗对比传统化疗一线治疗广泛期SCLC（extensive stage-SCLC, ES-SCLC）的总生存期延长。尽管取得一定疗效，相对于非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）等对免疫治疗敏感的肿瘤类型，SCLC的疗效仍不令人满意，这可能与其免疫抑制特征有关。本综述对SCLC免疫特征的研究现状进行总结，包括淋巴细胞和免疫抑制细胞在肿瘤内浸润情况、PD-L1和主要组织相容复合物（major histocompatibility complex, MHC）在肿瘤的表达以及外周血免疫细胞的改变，并对这些免疫特征的预后及其对ICI疗效的预测价值进行分析。

Update on the Biology, Management, and Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 13-15% of all new lung cancer cases in the US. The tumor has a tendency to disseminate early resulting in 80-85% of patients being diagnosed with extensive disease (ES-SCLC). Chemotherapy has provided SCLC patients considerable survival benefits over the past three decades. Nonetheless, most patients relapse and rarely survive beyond 2 years. Despite consistent overall response rates of ≥50%, until recently, median survival times and 2-year survivals only ranged between 7-10 months and 10-20%, respectively. Several chemotherapy agents possess activity against SCLC, both, as single agents and in combinations but etoposide-platinum emerged as the preferred first line regimen. Upon relapse, many patients remain candidates for additional therapy. However, the sensitivity of relapsed SCLC to further therapies is markedly reduced and dependent upon the level and duration of response to the initial treatment (platinum-sensitive vs. resistant relapse). Multiple factors suggest a therapeutic role for immunotherapy in SCLC: SCLC has been associated with immune-mediated paraneoplastic processes (cerebellar degeneration, limbic encephalitis, and Lambert-Eaton syndrome) and patients presenting with these paraneoplastic syndromes have shown more favorable outcomes, suggesting an underlying immune response mechanism.Comprehensive genomic profiling of SCLC indicates that the majority lack functional p53 (90%) and Rb1 (65%). These universal genetic aberrations facilitate poor genomic stability, thus perpetuating the generation of tumor associated antigens, amenable to targeting with immunotherapy.SCLC has one of the highest mutational loads, likely a reflection of the myriad of insults inflicted by smoking-related carcinogens. The relationship between tumor mutational load and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors has been established in multiple solid tumors, including preliminary results in relapsed SCLC. In this manuscript, we review the early (some failed and discontinued, some partly successful, and still ongoing) attempts to incorporate immunotherapy (particularly vaccine based approaches) to the treatment of SCLC, and the latest attempts (mostly incorporating the use of checkpoint inhibitors), including those with favorable but preliminary results (CheckMate 032, Keynote 028 and 158), and those with more definitive positive (iMpower 133 and CASPIAN) and negative (CheckMate 331 and 451) results.

Systemic Therapy of Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

In March 2019, the FDA approved the use of the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab, as a first-line treatment option in combination with platinum-etoposide (PE) for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) based upon the results of the IMpower133 trial. More recently, the FDA approved the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab in March 2020 , also in the frontline setting for SCLC based upon the results of the CASPIAN trial. Both these trials demonstrated a small, but significant overall survival (OS) benefit with the addition of a PD-L1 antibody to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of ED SCLC, thereby altering the treatment paradigm for this aggressive disease. Previously, the FDA had approved the anti-PD1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab as single-agent third-line treatment options based upon encouraging phase 1/2 data in patients with relapsed SCLC who had not received prior immunotherapy (IO). Despite these recent advances, the overall benefit of IO in SCLC remains somewhat disappointing in comparison with the results seen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, no reliable biomarkers exist to predict responsiveness to IO in SCLC, and the utility of second- or third-line immunotherapy is questionable in patients who have received IO as part of first-line treatment. There has also been minimal success in identifying targetable mutations in SCLC. Novel approaches include combination approaches with IO, including PARP inhibitors and CDK inhibitors. Few ongoing trials, however, have enrolled patients who have received frontline immunotherapy given the only recent change in standard of care. Consequently, the results of current trials evaluating second- and third-line therapies need to be interpreted and translated into clinical practice with caution. The most significant challenge in SCLC remains the identification of molecular targets for which drugs can be developed that can improve survival over the current standard of care.

The potential of retinoids for combination therapy of lung cancer: Updates and future directions

Lung cancer is the most common cancer-related death worldwide. Natural compounds have shown high biological and pharmaceutical relevance as anticancer agents. Retinoids are natural derivatives of vitamin A having many regulatory functions in the human body, including vision, cellular proliferation and differentiation, and activation of tumour suppressor genes. Retinoic acid (RA) is a highly active retinoid isoform with promising anti-lung cancer activity. The abnormal expression of retinoid receptors is associated with loss of anticancer activities and acquired resistance to RA in lung cancer. The preclinical promise has not translated to the general clinical utility of retinoids for lung cancer patients, especially those with a history of smoking. Newer retinoid nano-formulations and the combinatorial use of retinoids has been associated with lower toxicity and more favorably efficacy in both the preclinical and clinical settings. Here, we highlight epidemiological and clinical therapeutic studies involving retinoids and lung cancer. We also discuss the biological actions of retinoids in lung cancer, which include effects on cancer stem cell differentiation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and proliferative. We suggest that the use of retinoids in combination with conventional and targeted anticancer agents will broaden the utility of these potent anticancer compounds in the lung cancer clinic.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and small cell lung cancer: what's new?

Despite extensive research no meaningful progress in systemic treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been made in the past decades. Earlier attempts with immunotherapy including interferon and vaccination approaches had limited success. High mutational load, smoking history and potentially also the frequent presence of paraneoplastic phenomena-indicating an activated immune system-represent a rationale for a benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in SCLC. However, the likelihood of response is diminished due to poor T-cell activation resulting from low expression of MHC class I antigens, low amounts of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and low PD-L1 expression rates. Recently, early reports from studies with checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results with the potential for long term disease control in a subset of SCLC patients. However, reliable predictive biomarkers to better define the population drawing most benefit are currently lacking. Results from ongoing phase III trials in different treatment lines and in the maintenance setting are eagerly awaited.

Use of retinoic acid/aldehyde dehydrogenase pathway as potential targeted therapy against cancer stem cells

A large number of studies have investigated possible drug resistance mechanisms of cancer cells and suggested strategies to overcome it. In this review, we outline the role and function of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity in multiple cellular functions and in cancer stem cells (CSCs) and focus on the role of retinoic acid (RA), one of the products of ALDH isozymes. We discuss our observation that ATRA and other RAs can suppress ALDH activity and decrease different ALDH isozyme proteins and result in detrimental effects on cell proliferation, invasion and chemotherapy sensitivity. We review the known uses of different RAs in the treatment of cancers. We review the use of RAs in combination with chemo-/radiotherapy and the major signaling pathways affected in different tumor types. We provide follow-up on studies that may have used our prior observation with the aim of targeting the CSCs. We conclude with summary of the findings and potential impact of published studies on future use of RAs in the targeting of CSCs and drug resistance.

Personalized Therapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with distinct clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics. Despite robust responses to initial chemotherapy and radiation, the prognosis of patients with SCLC remains poor with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 10 %. Despite the fact that numerous molecularly targeted approaches have thus far failed to demonstrate clinical utility in SCLC, further advances will rely on better definition of the biological pathways that drive survival, proliferation and metastasis. Recent next-generation, molecular profiling studies have identified many new therapeutic targets in SCLC, as well as extreme genomic instability which explains the high degree of resistance. A wide variety of anti-angiogenic agents, growth factor inhibitors, pro-apoptotic agents, and epigenetic modulators have been evaluated in SCLC and many studies of these strategies are on-going. Perhaps the most promising approaches involve agents targeting cancer stem cell pathways and immunomodulatory drugs that interfere with the PD1 and CTLA-4 pathways. SCLC offers many barriers to the development of successful therapy, including limited tumor samples, inadequate preclinical models, high mutational burden, and aggressive tumor growth which impairs functional status and hampers enrollment on clinical trials.

Novel therapies in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the lung with a tendency to metastasize widely early in the course of the disease. The VA staging system classifies the disease into limited stage (LS) which is confined to one hemithorax and can be included into one radiation field or extensive stage (ES) which extends beyond one hemithorax. Current standard of care is concurrent chemoradiation for LS disease and chemotherapy alone for ES disease. Only a quarter of patients with LS disease will be cured with current standard treatments and majority of the patients ultimately succumb to their disease. A very complex genetic landscape of SCLC accounts for its resistance to conventional therapy and a high recurrence rate, however, at the same time this complexity can form the basis for effective targeted therapy for the disease. In recent years, several different therapeutic strategies and targeted agents have been under investigation for their potential role in SCLC. Several of them including EGFR TKIs, BCR-ABL TKIs, mTOR inhibitors, and VEGF inhibitors have been unsuccessful in showing a survival advantage in this disease. Several others including DNA repair inhibitors, cellular developmental pathway inhibitors, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), as well as immune therapy with vaccines, immunomodulators, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are being tested. So far, none of these agents are approved for use in SCLC and the majority are in phase I/II clinical trials, with immune checkpoint inhibitors being the most promising therapeutic strategy. In this article, we will discuss these novel therapeutic agents and currently available data in SCLC.

Decreased Interferon Alpha/Beta Signature Associated with Human Lung Tumorigenesis

Accumulating evidence suggests that interferon (IFN) alpha/beta are involved in antitumor immunity and cancer immunoediting, but information on the antitumor effects of IFN alpha/beta in lung cancer is limited. In our study, we elucidated the IFN alpha/beta signature during both human fetal lung development and lung tumorigenesis. Our findings indicated gradual upregulation in the IFN alpha/beta signature during human fetal lung development. In addition, this signature was progressively downregulated in normal human airway epithelial cells from lung cancer patients, in immortalized human bronchial epithelial cell lines from later passages, in late-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) tissues, and in LSCC tissues exhibiting lymph node metastasis. Therefore, from its earliest stages, lung tumorigenesis may be associated with a decreased IFN alpha/beta signature. This association may provide insight to guide the detection of high-risk lung cancer patients.

Immunotherapy treatments for small-cell lung cancer: past, present and future

Small-cell lung cancer remains a considerable cause of morbidity and mortality. To this day, first-line therapy continues to be a platinum agent with etoposide, combined with radiation therapy in cases of limited stage disease. Numerous, largely unsuccessful, attempts at controlling the disease have included different chemotherapy strategies, the utilization of antiangiogenic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and other treatment modalities. Immunotherapy, including vaccines, immune response modifiers, inhibitors of check point blockades and immunologic-targeted toxins may well be the future of treatment, not only to enhance the proven chemotherapy effects, but to improve the control of minimal residual disease and the response with salvage chemotherapy. This article reviews the current advances in immunotherapeutic strategies against small-cell lung cancer.

Vitamin A and retinoid derivatives for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite reported antiproliferative activity of vitamin A and its common use for cancer, there is no comprehensive synthesis of its safety and efficacy in lung cancers. To address this issue we conducted a systematic review of the safety and efficacy of vitamin A for the treatment and prevention of lung cancers.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Two independent reviewers searched six electronic databases from inception to July 2009 for clinical, observational, and preclinical evidence pertaining to the safety and efficacy of vitamin A and related retinoids for lung cancers. 248 studies were included for full review and analysis. Five RCTs assessed treatment of lung cancers, three assessed primary prevention, and three looked at secondary prevention of lung cancers. Five surrogate studies, 26 phase I/II, 32 observational, and 67 preclinical studies were also included. 107 studies were included for interactions between vitamin A and chemo- or radiation-therapy. Although some studies demonstrated benefits, there was insufficient evidence overall to support the use of vitamin A or related retinoids for the treatment or prevention of lung cancers. Retinyl palmitate combined with beta carotene increased risk of lung cancer in smokers in the large CARET trial. Pooling of three studies pertaining to treatment and three studies on secondary prevention revealed no significant effects on response rate, second primary tumor, recurrence, 5-year survival, and mortality. There was a small improvement in event free survival associated with vitamin A compared to controls, RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.13-1.35). The synthetic rexinoid bexarotene increased survival significantly among a subset of patients in two RCTs (p<0.014, <0.087).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of evidence to support the use of naturally occurring retinoids for the treatment and prevention of lung cancers. The rexinoid bexarotene may hold promise for use among a subset of patients, and deserves further study.

The GRIMs: a new interface between cell death regulation and interferon/retinoid induced growth suppression

Cytokines and vitamins play a central role in controlling neoplastic cell growth. The interferon (IFN) family of cytokines regulates antiviral, anti-tumor, antimicrobial, differentiation, and immune responses in mammals. Significant advances have been made with respect to IFN-induced signal transduction pathways and antiviral responses. However, the IFN-induced anti-tumor actions are poorly defined. Although IFNs themselves inhibit tumor growth, combination of IFNs with retinoids (a class of Vitamin A related compounds) strongly potentiates the IFN-regulated anti-tumor action in a number of cell types. To define the molecular mechanisms involved in IFN/retinoid (RA)-induced apoptosis we have employed a genetic approach and identified several critical genes. In this review, I provide the current picture of IFN- RA- and IFN/RA-regulated growth suppressive pathways. In particular, I focus on a novel set of genes, the genes-associated with retinoid-interferon induced mortality (GRIM). GRIMs may be novel types of tumor suppressors, useful as biological response markers and potentially novel targets for drug development.

Recent advances in management of small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a smoking-related disease with a poor prognosis. While SCLC is usually initially sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, responses are rarely long lasting. Frustratingly, most patients ultimately relapse, often with increasingly treatment resistant disease. Many strategies have been developed in an attempt to improve treatment outcomes, which have plateaued since the introduction of combination chemotherapy in the 1980s. These include trials of maintenance therapy, and dose intensification, the latter by means of increasing dose density, growth factor support and high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. None have been shown to improve patient survival. On the other hand, the integration of concurrent thoracic radiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation has improved the survival outcomes in patients with limited disease. In extensive disease, irinotecan combined with cisplatin has shown promise in improving survival over conventional platinum/etoposide chemotherapy schedules and a confirmatory study is awaited. The future of SCLC treatment may however lie with molecularly targeted therapies, such as antiangiogenesis agents and signal transduction inhibitors, which are being studied at present.

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 2

The second part of this review examines the use of recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFNalpha) in the following solid tumours: superficial bladder cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma, head and neck cancer, gastrointestinal cancers, lung cancer, mesothelioma and ovarian, breast and cervical malignancies. In superficial bladder cancer, intravesical rIFNalpha has a promising role as second-line therapy in patients resistant or intolerant to intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). In HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma, rIFNalpha is active as monotherapy and in combination with antiretroviral agents, especially in patients with CD4 counts >200/mm(3), no prior opportunistic infections and nonvisceral disease. rIFNalpha has shown encouraging results when used in combination with retinoids in the chemoprevention of head and neck squamous cell cancers. It is effective in the chemoprevention of hepatocellular cancer in hepatitis C-seropositive patients. In neuroendocrine tumours, including carcinoid tumour, low-dosage (</=3 MU) or intermediate-dosage (5 to 10 MU) rIFNalpha is indicated as second-line treatment, either with octreotide or alone in patients resistant to somatostatin analogues. Intracavitary IFNalpha may be useful in malignant pleural effusions from mesothelioma. Similarly, intraperitoneal IFNalpha may have a role in the treatment of minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer. In breast cancer, the only possible role for IFNalpha appears to be intralesional administration for resistant disease. IFNalpha may have a role as a radiosensitising agent for the treatment of cervical cancer; however, this requires confirmation in randomised trials. On the basis of current evidence, the routine use of rIFNalpha is not recommended in the therapy of head and neck squamous cell cancers, upper gastrointestinal tract, colorectal and lung cancers, or mesothelioma. Pegylated IFNalpha (peginterferon-alpha) is an exciting development that offers theoretical advantages of increased efficacy, reduced toxicity and improved compliance. Further data from randomised studies in solid tumours are needed where rIFNalpha has activity, such as neuroendocrine tumours, minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer, and cervical cancer. A better understanding of the biological mechanisms that determine response to rIFNalpha is needed. Studies of IFNalpha-stimulated gene expression, which are now feasible, should help to identify molecular predictors of response and allow us to target therapy more selectively to patients with solid tumours responsive to IFNalpha.

Interferons and their application in the diseases of the lung

Interferons (IFNs) are a family of cytokine mediators that are critically involved in alerting the cellular immune system to viral infections of host cells. There are three major classes of IFNs, as follows: IFN-alpha; IFN-beta; and IFN-gamma. IFNs are being investigated and applied in various respiratory disorders, including interstitial lung diseases, lung cancer, malignant mesothelioma, malignant pleural effusions, and respiratory infections. Recent promising preliminary results concerning patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who have been treated with IFN-gamma1b should prompt the performance of further confirmatory well-designed multicenter trials. IFN-gamma is emerging as an important cytokine for use in the treatment of patients with infectious diseases, including multidrug-resistant pulmonary TB. A better understanding of IFN biology, indications, side effect profiles, and toxicity management will aid in optimizing its use in the treatment of patients. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to review the current clinical use of IFNs in the treatment of patients with respiratory diseases.

Retinoids in combination therapies for the treatment of cancer: mechanisms and perspectives

Retinoid derivatives have been of special interest in cancer research because of their antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing activities in premalignant and malignant cells. Some retinoids are clinically effective in cancer therapy and prevention, and all-trans-retinoic acid is being used for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Unfortunately, classical retinoids are not effective against most advanced solid tumors and cause undesirable side effects, which have limited the full development of retinoids as chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic drugs. The recent identification of selective retinoid derivatives capable of inducing apoptosis and their combination with other anticancer therapies promises a more effective and less toxic manner to the successful use of retinoids in cancer therapy.

Interferon trials in small cell lung cancer at one institution: a comparison of results obtained before and after initiation of systematic treatment trials using IFN-alpha in combination with other modalities

Chemotherapy became the primary treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the early 1970s. The standard drug combinations were first vincristine, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) and then, from the early 1980s, etoposide-platinum combinations. Despite a good initial objective response, however, patients usually suffer a rapid relapse. Treatment development has, therefore, focused on ways to overcome drug resistance, and on the addition of cytokines to the chemotherapeutic arsenal. Interferon (IFN) was one of the first cytokines found to have anticancer effects, and it was introduced into the combined modality regimens used to treat SCLC in the early 1980s in an attempt to overcome the problem of early relapse. The role of IFN was investigated with the aim of establishing how best to combine it with other treatments for SCLC. In this paper, we review the impact of IFN on the outcome for 714 SCLC patients who were treated in randomized IFN trials at one institution over a period of 20 years and IFN trials conducted at other institutions during the same period. The parameters we used at our institution to measure outcome tended to improve during the period when patients were being treated in our three randomized IFN trials, compared with the period when patients received only standard treatment in a nonclinical trial setting. However, the differences were not statistically significant. During this period, IFN was used as maintenance therapy, concomitantly with chemotherapy, and combined with other treatment modalities. Our experience is that IFN-alpha is most effective when administered as low-dose maintenance treatment. Other IFN trials published during the same period were small and heterogeneous. Results were inconsistent and added little new information, although it has been shown that high pretreatment levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) predict a poor response to treatment and consequently a poor outcome. The recently confirmed antiangiogenic properties of IFN deserve to be investigated in studies of maintenance treatment, in combination with other biologic agents. Patient should be selected according to criteria based on pretreatment assessment of biologic markers, such as VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Our studies, all at one institution, pioneered the biologic treatment of solid tumors and developed a solid basis of knowledge for future studies of biologic agents in cancer treatment.

Advances in systemic therapy of small cell cancer of the lung

Over the last 20 years, progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer has been painfully slow. Despite dramatic initial responses to chemotherapy, most patients relapse quickly with an overall 5-year survival of about 5%. Recent trials however offer some hope at changing this picture. Combining standard regimens with newer agents has doubled median survival in some cases. The use of novel targeted agents holds the promise of significantly increasing the survival in this disease, with manageable toxicity. This review outlines current treatment strategies, summarizes recent clinical trials and offers a view of what the next 5 years may hold for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.