Docetaxel with epirubicin--investigations on cardiac safety

Heart rate variability and vibration perception threshold to assess chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in women with breast cancer - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is well known that breast cancer (BC) patients often suffer from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). However, it is not always recognized that they have higher risk of falling, dizziness and other signs of dysfunctional autonomous nervous system. We performed a systematic review of the literature on vibration perception threshold (VPT) and heart rate variability (HRV) as methods to objectively assess (CIPN) in BC-patients. Could VPT and HRV describe coexisting sensory and autonomic nerve damage?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed was searched in September 2019. The included studies had to address HRV and/or VPT in BC-patients who received chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Seven studies assessed VPT and six studies assessed HRV in BC-patients. Studies showed lowered perception of vibrations after chemotherapy reflected in higher VPT and no changes in HRV after taxane-based chemotherapy. No studies evaluated VPT and HRV at the same time.

CONCLUSION

The results were limited by short follow-up, small sample sizes, and different chemotherapy regimens which makes generalizability problematic. A standard assessment method of CIPN is still missing and further research is needed to evaluate if VPT and HRV could contribute to an objective assessment of CIPN. With higher survival rates for BC-patients autonomous and sensory nerve damage will be an increasing task. However, our literature review showed that no one have focused on the combination of autonomous and sensory affection measured by the simple methods VPT and HRV. Therefore, we encourage the development of international guidelines for the objective measure of nerve damage in BC-patients.

Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3-4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand-foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2-3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC.