Pharmacokinetics of amprenavir given once or twice a day when combined with atazanavir in heavily pre-treated HIV-positive patients

Atazanavir: The Advent of a New Generation of More Convenient Protease Inhibitors

Protease inhibitors (PIs) have created a new future for many HIV-infected patients. After the initial enthusiasm following its first approval, complex drug schedules and frequent toxicities of PIs prompted researchers to find alternative drugs. However, it is now clear that not all triple combinations are equally valid. Certain regimens based on the association of only reverse transcriptase inhibitors have shown high rates of virological failure, with the selection of cross-resistance mutations. The availability of new generation PIs, such as atazanavir, with improved safety profiles and more convenient administration schedules returns this drug family to the front of the HIV therapeutic armamentarium. Recent clinical studies support the assertion that atazanavir may display excellent behavior as part of first-line regimens in rescue interventions or in simplification strategies.

Atazanavir: its role in HIV treatment

Azatanavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is a substrate and inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A and an inhibitor and inducer of P-glycoprotein. It has similar virologic efficacy as efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in antiretroviral-naive individuals. Its impact on lipids is less than other PIs and it is suitable for those in whom hyperlipidemia is undesirable. Ritonavir boosting of atazanavir enhances the bioavailability of atazanavir but may result in some elevation of lipids and is recommended for treatment-experienced patients and those receiving efavirenz or tenofovir. Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has similar antiviral activity as ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced patients. Atazanavir causes unconjugated bilirubinemia in over 40% of patients but results in less than 2% discontinuations. Atazanavir is licensed for once-daily use and atazanavir/ritonavir competes with lopinavir/ritonavir as the most commonly prescribed PI.

Atazanavir: simplicity and convenience in different scenarios

HIV protease inhibitors (PI) have undergone the most significant evolution when considering the different families of antiretrovirals. Marketed in 2003, atazanavir (ATV) is the first azapeptide PI, and is considered a member of the second generation of PIs. Important characteristics make ATV different from other drugs in the same family of antiretrovirals. It is administered once daily, either as two capsules (200 mg) or boosted with ritonavir (100 mg) two capsules (150 mg) or one capsule (300 mg). No elevations in serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides have been observed with unboosted ATV. Although some increases in these levels are found with boosted ATV, these were lower when compared with other PIs. Elevation in unconjugated bilirubin levels, which is usually not dose limiting, is the most frequent adverse event. Naive patients receiving ATV boosted with ritonavir do not develop PI mutations at failure, whereas unboosted ATV in the same scenario induces the I50L mutation, which does not confer cross-resistance to other PIs. The best scenario for unboosted ATV is simplification. In PI treatment-experienced patients with PI mutations, susceptibility to ATV is usually reduced, so it should be administered with ritonavir. As with other PIs, careful attention must be given to pharmacokinetic drug interactions; the coadministration of certain commonly used drugs among HIV-infected patients, tenofovir and members of the proton pump inhibitor family, leads to significantly lower plasma levels of ATV.

Successful treatment with atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir combination therapy in protease inhibitor-susceptible and protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-infected patients

The combination of atazanavir (ATV) plus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) has been used in practice. However, clinical data supporting its use are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of regimens with ATV + LPV/r in protease inhibitor (PI)-susceptible and PI-resistant patients. A retrospective review of 2703 charts was performed to identify all patients who received ATV + LPV/r. From June 2003 to January 2005, 33 patients received ATV + LPV/r with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 3 months or more. Virologic success (HIV-RNA < 400 copies per milliliter) was achieved in 30 patients (91%) in a median of 10 weeks (range, 2-68). Nineteen of the 23 patients (83%) who had ultrasensitive viral load (VL) assays were nondetectable. Among patients with 6 or more protease resistance (PR) mutations (PI-resistant), 11 of 14 (79%) achieved virologic success. Eleven of those received phenotypic testing (10 Virtual Phenotype, VircoLab, Baltimore, MD). Despite predicted phenotypic resistance to ATV (6 patients) and LPV/r (7 patients), virologic success was achieved in 4 of 6 (67%) and 4 of 7 (57%), respectively. The 3 PI-resistant patients who were virologic failures had extensive prior LPV/r use, 8-11 PR mutations, and predicted phenotypic resistance to LPV/r, but 2 of 3 had CD4 increases with ATV + LPV/r. Overall, 28 patients (85%) continue to tolerate ATV + LPV/r for a median of 32 weeks follow-up (range, 12-76). Combination ATV + LPV/r with NRTIs appears safe, tolerable, and efficacious in PI-resistant patients (>/=6 PR mutations) and predicted phenotypic resistance to ATV and LPV/r. Further studies of ATV + LPV/r in HIV-treatment are warranted.

Review of atazanavir: a novel HIV protease inhibitor

Atazanavir is a novel and potent protease inhibitor that differs from other protease inhibitors because of its good gastrointestinal tolerability, once-daily dosing, low pill burden and it does not seem to cause insulin resistance or lipid elevations in short-term use. Atazanavir produces an increase in indirect bilirubin levels, which is not related to hepatotoxicity. The incidence of atazanavir-related hyperbilirubinaemia does not seem to be increased in hepatitis B or C coinfection. I50L is atazanavir's signature mutation. It has been shown in previously treated patients that resistance is likely when three or more protease inhibitor resistance-related primary mutations are present.

Early clinical experience with atazanavir in treatment-experienced patients

Background: Atazanavir (ATV) is a newly approved protease inhibitor following successful clinical trials in naive and treatment-experienced patients. We describe early experience with ATV in treatment-experienced patients attending a single ambulatory care clinic in Sydney. Methods: Patients commencing ATV between February 2003 and May 2004 in an expanded access program were identified from the clinic pharmacy’s database. Data were retrospectively collected from patients’ medical records. Results: Data from 30 patients were analysed. Reasons for commencing ATV were: virological failure in six patients (20%); toxicity to previous regimen in 13 patients (43%); simplification strategy in two patients (7%); and recommencing therapy in nine patients (30%) following treatment interruption. Six patients (20%) discontinued ATV. One patient discontinued ATV due to virological failure, two patients discontinued due to toxicity to concomitant antiretrovirals, two as a result of the patient’s choice and one as a result of the physician’s decision. Eighteen patients commenced ATV in combination therapy with a detectable viral load (VL). From a baseline VL of 4.3 ± 1.1 log10 copies mL–1, 15 (83%) had >1.0 log decrease in VL with 11 (61%) achieving viral suppression (<50 copies mL–1). Three (16%) failures were recorded in this group. Twelve subjects commenced ATV with an undetectable VL. One failure was recorded in this group. Bilirubin increased by 22.7 μmol L–1 (P < 0.001), with significant decreases in cholesterol (1.4 mmol L–1, P = 0.01) and triglycerides (1.5 mmol L–1, P = 0.01) in 12 patients on ritonavir-boosted ATV. Conclusion: This audit found ATV to be safe, well tolerated and had good potency in treatment-experienced patients. However caution should be exercised in switching to ATV in heavily pre-treated patients.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of atazanavir given alone or in combination with saquinavir hard-gel capsules or amprenavir in HIV-1-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this pilot study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV) when given in combination with amprenavir (APV) or saquinavir hard-gel capsules (SQV) to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients.

METHODS

Included in the study were 34 HIV-infected patients enrolled in the ATV Early Access Program, who were treated with unboosted ATV alone (group 1) or with the double protease inhibitor combinations, ATV plus APV (group 2) or ATV plus SQV (group 3). ATV was given at a daily dose of 400 mg q.d. with the morning meal with SQV 1200 mg per day or APV 1200 mg per day. Serial blood samples for steady-state ATV pharmacokinetics were collected before the morning dose and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 24 h post-dosing. ATV plasma concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 12 received ATV as a single protease inhibitor; 12 received ATV in combination with APV; and 10 in combination with SQV. Geometric mean (coefficient of variation) ATV C(trough) was 110 ng/ml (2.38), 86 ng/ml (0.84) and 149 ng/ml (2.01) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. ATV C(trough) in both double protease inhibitor combination regimens was not significantly different from that as a single protease inhibitor [geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-1.58, P=not significant for group 2 versus group 1 and 1.34, 0.40-4.49, P=not significant, for group 3 versus group 1). Patients treated with ATV plus APV had a 40.2% lower ATV C(max) and a 30.8% smaller ATV AUC than the reference group treated with unboosted ATV alone: both these differences were statistically significant (GMR, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.41-0.85, P=0.005 and 0.69, 0.48-0.99, P=0.056, respectively). No difference was observed for either C(max) or AUC between the group treated with ATV plus SQV and the reference group (GMR, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.47-1.30, P=not significant and 1.24, 0.73-2.10, P=not significant, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ATV pharmacokinetics does not seem to be influenced by the concomitant administration of SQV, whereas APV significantly lowers plasma ATV levels.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Drug–Drug Interactions Involving Antiretroviral Drugs

The consensus of current international guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection is that data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) provide a framework for the implementation of TDM in certain defined scenarios in clinical practice. However, the utility of TDM is considered to be on an individual basis until more data are obtained from large clinical trials showing the benefit of TDM.

In April 2004, a panel of experts met for the second time in Rome, Italy. This was following the inaugural meeting in Perugia, Italy, in October 2000, which resulted in the manuscript published in AIDS 2002, 16(Suppl 1):S5–S37. The objectives of this second meeting were to review and update the numerous questions surrounding TDM of antiretroviral drugs and discuss the clinical utility, current concerns and future prospects of drug concentration monitoring in the care of HIV-1-infected individuals. A major focus of the meeting was to discuss and critically analyse recent and precedent clinical drug–drug interaction data to provide a clear framework of the pharmacological basis of how one drug may impact the disposition of another.

This report, which has been updated to include material published or presented at international conferences up to the end of December 2004, reviews recent pivotal pharmacokinetic interaction data and provides advice to clinical care providers on how some drug–drug interactions may be prevented, avoided or managed, and, when data are available, on what dose adjustments and interventions should be performed.

Fosamprenavir: advancing HIV protease inhibitor treatment options

Fosamprenavir, the prodrug formulation of amprenavir, is a protease inhibitor recently approved in the US for the treatment of HIV infection. This agent combines the pharmacological profile of amprenavir with a low pill burden and flexible dosing schedule. Three large international trials have been completed. In treatment-naive patients, fosamprenavir, both ritonavir-boosted and -unboosted, met primary end points of non-inferiority against nelfinavir. Among naive patients, no protease inhibitor mutations emerged in those failing the boosted fosamprenavir regimen. Boosted fosamprenavir was compared to lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients. Non-inferiority was not achieved but similar numbers of patients achieved viral suppression when fosamprenavir was dosed twice-daily. Fosamprenavir demonstrates a favourable lipid profile in naive patients, and a low incidence of adverse effects. Fosamprenavir, as with lopinavir/ritonavir, distinguishes itself among other protease inhibitors with its potent activity in those with advanced HIV. Future trials comparing fosamprenavir with current standard regimens will further assist in defining its role in clinical practice.

The pharmacokinetics of HIV protease inhibitor combinations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The clinical use of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens has evolved recently. This strategy offers a number of unique benefits, including pharmacokinetic enhancement of two different protease inhibitors with low dose ritonavir. We review the pharmacologic rationale for the double-boosted protease inhibitor combinations and the complex drug-drug interactions that occur among different protease inhibitors when co-administered.

RECENT FINDINGS

The discovery and widespread clinical use of low dose ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer of other protease inhibitors has significantly improved the management of HIV infection treatment. This has subsequently led to the development of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens which have been shown to be effective in heavily pre-treated patients, in whom it is crucial to maintain drug concentrations sufficient to suppress viruses with multiple resistance mutations. Interesting pharmacokinetic data have been recently produced showing the complexity of the interactions among three protease inhibitors. As the outcome of these multidrug interactions may be difficult to predict, formal pharmacokinetic studies have been fundamental to determine which protease inhibitors are best to administer in combination.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the current literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens and general considerations regarding their usage in the treatment of HIV-infected patients.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Summary of Efficacy and Tolerability of Atazanavir

The efficacy of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy is now well established and has provided benefits to many patients with HIV infection. Atazanavir is a new azapeptide PI compound that was recently approved in the US and Europe. Atazanavir is recommended in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is rapidly absorbed and administration of a single dose of atazanavir with a light meal resulted in a 70% increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC); therefore atazanavir should be taken with food. Atazanavir is 86% bound to human serum protein independently of concentration. Concentration in body fluids appeared to be lower than plasma concentration. Like other PIs, atazanavir is extensively metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes. The mean terminal elimination half-life in healthy volunteers was approximately 7 hours at steady state following administration of atazanavir 400 mg daily with a light meal. When atazanavir 300 mg was coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg on a once-daily dosage regimen, atazanavir AUC from 0 to 24 hours and minimum plasma concentration were increased by 3- to 4-fold and approximately 10-fold, respectively, compared with atazanavir 300 mg alone. Therefore, ritonavir boosted atazanavir regimen (ritonavir 100 mg and atazanavir 300 mg once daily) is increasingly favoured in some patients. Efavirenz, a potent CYP3A inducer, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 75% and, unexpectedly, tenofovir, a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 25%. Average predose concentrations in HIV-infected patients who received atazanavir 400mg once daily were 273 ng/mL, which was believed to be several-fold higher than protein-binding corrected 50% inhibitory concentration of wild-type viruses. In HIV-infected patients who received once-daily ritonavir (100mg) boosted atazanavir (300 mg), mean (+/-SD) trough concentration was 862 (+/-838) ng/mL. Several clinical trials showed the efficacy of atazanavir 400 mg once daily with a nucleoside analogue backbone in antiretroviral-naive patients. The atazanavir 300/ritonavir 100 mg once-daily combination coadministered with other antiretrovirals showed the efficacy of this strategy in patients receiving efavirenz or in moderately antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients. Recommended once-daily doses of atazanavir taken with food are either 400 mg or 300 mg in combination with low dose ritonavir (100 mg) in moderately antiretroviral-experienced patients. Major advantages of atazanavir to date are its simplicity of administration (once-daily administration) and its less undesirable effect on the lipid profiles in patients.