Enhanced HIV-specific immune responses in chronically HIV-infected patients receiving didanosine plus hydroxyurea

Alteration of lymphocyte phenotype and function in sickle cell anemia: Implications for vaccine responses

Individuals with sickle cell anemia (SCA) have increased susceptibility to infections, secondary to impairment of immune function. Besides the described dysfunction in innate immunity, including impaired opsonization and phagocytosis of bacteria, evidence of dysfunction of T and B lymphocytes in SCA has also been reported. This includes reduction in the proportion of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, reduction of CD4+ helper: CD8+ suppressor T cell ratio, aberrant activation and dysfunction of regulatory T cells (Treg ), skewing of CD4+ T cells towards Th2 response and loss of IgM-secreting CD27 + IgM(high) IgD(low) memory B cells. These changes occur on the background of immune activation characterized by predominance of memory CD4+ T cell phenotypes, increased Th17 signaling and elevated levels of C-reactive protein and pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α, which may affect the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of vaccines available to prevent infections in SCA. Thus, in order to optimize the use of vaccines in SCA, a thorough understanding of T and B lymphocyte functions and vaccine reactivity among individuals with SCA is needed. Studies should be encouraged of different SCA populations, including sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of SCA is highest. This article summarizes our current understanding of lymphocyte biology in SCA, and highlights areas that warrant future research. Am. J. Hematol. 91:938-946, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Treating HIV/AIDS by reducing immune system activation: the paradox of immune deficiency and immune hyperactivation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To collect published evidence in support of a novel immune therapeutic approach to reduce the excess of immune activation that ultimately turns into immune deficiency in HIV/AIDS.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large body of evidence has been collected in support of the pathogenetic interpretation that prolonged immune overactivation induced by HIV during the course of chronic infection exhausts the immune system and leads to AIDS. Some groups are exploring the possibility of therapeutic interventions to limit the immune system overload. Cytostatic drugs appear promising candidates to achieve the goal, as they restrain cell proliferation without blocking it. At the same time, they do not affect cellular response to antigenic stimulation, and at appropriate dosages are not immune suppressive.

SUMMARY

Presently available antiretrovirals only partially reduce immune system activation during chronic HIV infection. Further clinical research is warranted to test cytostatic drugs to avert immune overactivation and prevent progression to AIDS.

Immunotherapeutic restoration in HIV-infected individuals

While the development of combined active antiretroviral therapy (cART) has dramatically improved life expectancies and quality of life in HIV-infected individuals, long-term clinical problems, such as metabolic complications, remain important constraints of life-long cART. Complete immune restoration using only cART is normally unattainable even in cases of sufficient plasma viral suppression. The need for immunologic adjuncts that complement cART remains, because while cART alone may result in the complete recovery of peripheral net CD4+ T lymphocytes, it may not affect the reservoir of HIV-infected cells. Here, we review current immunotherapies for HIV infection, with a particular emphasis on recent advances in cytokine therapies, therapeutic immunization, monoclonal antibodies, immune-modulating drugs, nanotechnology-based approaches and radioimmunotherapy.

Primary HIV infection: to treat or not to treat?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review new data on the use of antiretroviral therapy in primary HIV infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

The concept of 'hit HIV hard and early' supporting the use of antiretroviral therapy to treat the early stages of HIV infection has been revisited. Recent demonstration of massive, rapid and largely irreversible HIV-mediated destruction of memory CD4+ T cells predominantly occurring in the gut suggests that primary HIV infection may be the only time that intervention could confer lasting immunological benefit. There are no data, however, from randomized controlled trials supporting the use of antiretroviral therapy in primary HIV infection, although a number of observational studies have demonstrated limited, transient improvements in measured immunological outcomes. The first randomized controlled trials powered to address whether antiretroviral therapy of a limited duration in primary HIV infection can influence long-term CD4 decline (SPARTAC) is now fully recruited but will report in 2-3 years. In addition, given that individuals with primary HIV infection contribute disproportionately towards onward HIV transmission, there may be an additional public health impetus for earlier diagnosis and intervention in primary HIV infection.

SUMMARY

In the absence of randomized controlled trials data demonstrating clinical benefit of antiretroviral therapy intervention in primary HIV infection, clinical guidelines remain unclear. Intervention seems a logical strategy to counter the high viraemia, enhanced onward transmissibility, and immunological destruction which occurs during primary HIV infection. The nature, duration and timing of that intervention after HIV acquisition remains unknown.

Hydroxyurea exerts an anti-proliferative effect on T cells but has no direct impact on cellular activation

Hydroxyurea (HU) is a cytostatic drug which has been used as an anti-HIV agent due mainly to its synergistic activity when combined with certain anti-retrovirals. In addition, HU might have a beneficial effect on parameters involved in the pathogenesis of HIV infection, such as immune activation. To test this hypothesis, the effect of HU on T cell proliferation and T cell activation, as well as the potential association between these two phenomena, were examined in an in vitro model. HU exerted a dose-dependent anti-proliferative effect on T cells, and modulated the expression of different activation markers. In cells exposed to HU, expression of CD25 and CD38 diminished in a dose-dependent manner, whereas expression of CD69 increased. However, when the expression of these markers was examined separately on proliferating and non-proliferating lymphocytes, HU did not exert any significant effect. Thus, the effect of HU on T cell activation is not direct and seems to be mediated through its effect on T cell proliferation.

Immunological and virological effects of structured treatment interruptions following exposure to hydroxyurea plus didanosine

Both hydroxyurea (HU) and structured treatment interruptions (STI) have been investigated as therapeutic approaches to enhance immune responses in chronically HIV-infected individuals. HIV-specific T cell responses as well as T cell activation were analyzed longitudinally in 31 HIV-infected individuals who had been treated for the prior 12 months with didanosine (ddI) plus HU and thereafter completed three STI cycles consisting of 2 months off and 2 months on ddI-HU. Similar increases in plasma HIV-RNA were seen in each of the three cycles off therapy, whereas CD4 counts remained fairly stable along the study period. T cell activation paralleled the evolution of plasma HIV-RNA during the first STI cycle and waned afterward. At baseline most patients presented a high level of CD8+ responses to different HIV peptide pools and 23% of them had CD4+ responses to Gag and/or Env. The level of CD8+ responses against each pool was stable and did not increase during STI cycles, while CD4 responses tended to decline. However, the contribution of Nef-specific response to the total CD8 response tended to increase. In a multivariate model, both a higher baseline plasma HIV-RNA and a higher level of Nef-specific response contribution to the total CD8+ response were independently associated with lower plasma HIV-RNA increases during each of the three STI cycles. Nef-specific CD8+ responses might contribute to a better virological control of HIV replication following treatment interruptions in HIV-infected individuals and might be boosted by the immunomodulatory effect of HU.

DNA immunization in combination with effective antiretroviral drug therapy controls viral rebound and prevents simian AIDS after treatment is discontinued

DNA immunization in conjunction with antiretroviral therapy was evaluated in SIV-infected rhesus macaques treated with [R]-9-[2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl]adenine (PMPA). Macaques were immunized monthly with DNA vaccines expressing either SIV gag/tat or SIV gag/tat and 19 CD8+ T cell epitopes during 7 months of therapy. Half the animals from each group were additionally immunized before infection. Only 60% of the animals (4 controls, 20 vaccinated) responded to PMPA (ART responders). All 4 ART responder controls demonstrated viral rebound or CD4 decline after PMPA was withdrawn. In contrast, 17 of 20 vaccinated ART responders contained viral rebound for over 7 months after PMPA was withdrawn. Viral control correlated with stable CD4 counts, higher lymphoproliferation and an increase in the magnitude and breadth of the CD8+ T cell response. Immunizing before infection or with multi-epitopes enhanced these effects. These results demonstrate that DNA immunization during antiretroviral therapy may be an effective strategy to treat HIV infection.

Partial treatment interruption of protease inhibitors augments HIV-specific immune responses in vertically infected pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Although highly active antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected children, it often fails to completely suppress viral replication, thereby allowing the emergence of drug-resistant variants. Protease inhibitor (PI) based therapy has been hypothesized to depress cell-mediated immune responses by reducing antigen presentation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of partial treatment interruption (PTI) of PI on HIV-specific cellular immune responses in children.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study of HIV-specific cellular immune responses in 13 children who were vertically infected with HIV. All had detectable plasma viremia and had undergone PTI for a median of 1.0 year (range, 0.41-3.35 years) while continuing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy.

RESULTS

No significant changes in viral load were observed in the immediate time-point before and during PTI (P = 0.84) as well as in the overall period before and during PTI (P = 0.17). CD4 T-cell levels declined slowly immediately before and during PTI (P = 0.07) as well as during the overall PTI period (P = 0.0002), but the rate of CD4 T-cell decline was not significantly increased during PTI. Immediate to PTI, HIV-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses increased by 70% (P < 0.0001) and 92% (P < 0.0001), respectively, and CD4 and CD8 T-cell activation levels (P = 0.6834 and P = 0.6081, respectively) remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

HIV-specific cellular immune responses are boosted in children who have interrupted PI-based therapy.

Lowering the dose of hydroxyurea minimizes toxicity and maximizes anti-HIV potency

The goal of this study was to optimize the hydroxyurea dosage in HIV-infected patients, and to minimize the toxicity and maximize the antiviral efficacy of the hydroxyurea-didanosine combination. In a randomized, open-label study (RIGHT 702, a multicenter trial performed in private and institutional practices), three daily doses (600 microg, 800-900 microg, and 1200 microg) of hydroxyurea were administered in combination with didanosine and stavudine to 115 chronically HIV-infected patients, one-third antiretroviral drug naive, with viremia between 5000 and 200,000 copies/ml regardless of CD4+ cell count. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies/ml after 24 weeks of therapy. In the RIGHT 702 intent-to-treat population the lowest (600 mg) dose of hydroxyurea was better tolerated, associated with fewer adverse events, and more potent by all efficacy parameters, including the primary end point (76 versus 60% patients with viremia<400 copies/ml at week 24 for the 600-mg and 800- to 900-mg dose groups, respectively; p=0.027), the mean area under the curve (60.3 versus 65.8; p=0.016), and the mean log10 decrease (-1.95 versus -0.77; p=0.001). Patients receiving 600 mg of hydroxyurea daily also had the highest CD4+ cell count, CD4+/CD8+ cell ratio, and lowest CD8+ cell count and percentage (p=0.035). The RIGHT 702 trial provides an explanation for the increased toxicity and decreased efficacy of hydroxyurea when it was used at high dosage (1200 mg daily). At the optimal dosage of 600 mg daily, hydroxyurea, in combination with didanosine, deserves reevaluation for the long-term management of HIV/AIDS worldwide, because of its excellent resistance profile, durability, and affordability.

Hydroxyurea exerts a cytostatic but not immunosuppressive effect on T lymphocytes

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that, despite a dose-dependent cytostatic effect, hydroxyurea (HU) does not have immunosuppressive effects.

METHODS

The effects of HU on T lymphocyte proliferation parameters, activation phenotype and cytokine production were examined in vitro after exposure to clinically relevant concentrations of HU (10, 50, and 100 micromol/l). The effects of HU in vivo on CD4 T cell counts, viral load, activation phenotype and virus-specific response were examined in 17 Rhesus macaques infected with SIV(mac251) and randomized into three groups: untreated controls; treated with (R)-9-(2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine (PMPA) and didanosine (ddI) only; and treated with PMPA, didanosine, and HU.

RESULTS

The in vitro inhibition of T lymphocyte proliferation confirmed the cytostatic effect of HU, with a linear dose-dependent effect; however, no relevant differences were found in the expression of activation markers between treated and untreated controls. Both T helper type 1 and type 2 cytokine production were enhanced by HU. Consistent with the in vitro results, a blunted increase of peripheral CD4 T cells was observed in vivo in the HU group, without relevant effects on the expression of activation markers, and SIV-specific T cell responses were not affected by HU.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyper-proliferation of T-lymphocytes is a major factor contributing to HIV pathogenesis. HU exerts a cytostatic effect on T lymphocytes, without altering their activation and apparently without having an immunosuppressive effect. The increase in cytokine production at the single cell level might compensate for the decrease in the percentage of activated CD4 T lymphocytes, without overall impairment of HIV-specific immune responses.