Median nerve F-wave latencies recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis

FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATIONS OF KILOHERTZ-FREQUENCY CARRIERS IN AFFERENT FIBER RECRUITMENT WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS SPINAL CORD STIMULATION

The use of kilohertz-frequency (KHF) waveforms has rapidly gained momentum in transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) to restore motor function after paralysis. However, the mechanisms by which these fast-alternating currents depolarize efferent and afferent fibers remain unknown. Our study fills this research gap by providing a hypothesis-and evidence-based investigation using peripheral nerve stimulation, lumbar tSCS, and cervical tSCS in 25 unimpaired participants together with computational modeling. Peripheral nerve stimulation experiments and computational modeling showed that KHF waveforms negatively impact the processes required to elicit action potentials, thereby increasing response thresholds and biasing the recruitment towards efferent fibers. While these results translate to tSCS, we also demonstrate that lumbar tSCS results in the preferential recruitment of afferent fibers, while cervical tSCS favors recruitment of efferent fibers. Given the assumed importance of proprioceptive afferents in motor recovery, our work suggests that the use of KHF waveforms should be reconsidered to maximize neurorehabilitation outcomes, particularly for cervical tSCS. We posit that careful analysis of the mechanisms that mediate responses elicited by novel approaches in tSCS is crucial to understanding their potential to restore motor function after paralysis.

Electrodiagnostic reference data for motor nerve conduction studies in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

To determine nerve conduction studies (NCS) reference data for motor nerves and F-waves in the upper and lower limbs of healthy subjects in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted between May 2015 and June 2019. Healthy subjects without neurological or systemic diseases were recruited. Motor NCS were performed following a standard protocol. Pearson correlations were employed between NCS parameters and age, gender, height, weight, and body mass index. Reference data were generated using the percentile method.

RESULTS

A total of 127 subjects were recruited for the upper limb studies and 137 for the lower limb studies. Quantile regression models were generated to estimate compound muscle action potential amplitude (adjusted for age), as well as F-wave minimal latency (adjusted for height). The estimated reference limits of distal motor latency (ms) and conduction velocity (m/s) for the different nerves were, respectively, 3.7 and 50 for the median nerve, 3.3 and 50 for the ulnar nerve, 5.8 and 40 for the tibial nerve, and 5.0 and 40 for the fibular nerve.

CONCLUSION

The reference data for motor NCS parameters and F-wave minimal latency are generally comparable with those of Western countries. However, minimal differences were observed. The underrepresentation of the older age group warrants future studies. The reference data for motor NCS parameters and F-wave minimal latency are generally comparable with those of Western countries. However, minimal differences were observed. The underrepresentation of the older age group warrants future studies.

The comparison of multiple F-wave variable studies and magnetic resonance imaging examinations in the assessment of cervical radiculopathy

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to investigate the correlation of the findings of multiple median and ulnar F-wave variables and magnetic resonance imaging examinations in the prediction of cervical radiculopathy.

DESIGN

The data of 68 patients who underwent both nerve conduction studies of the upper extremities and cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging within 3 mos of the nerve conduction studies were retrospectively reviewed and reinterpreted. The associations between multiple median and ulnar F-wave variables (including persistence, chronodispersion, and minimal, maximal, and mean latencies) and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lower cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (i.e., C7, C8, and T1 radiculopathy) were investigated.

RESULTS

Patients with lower cervical radiculopathy exhibited reduced right median F-wave persistence (P = 0.011), increased right ulnar F-wave chronodispersion (P = 0.041), and a trend toward increased left ulnar F-wave chronodispersion (P = 0.059); however, there were no other consistent significant differences in the F-wave variables between patients with and patients without magnetic resonance imaging evidence of lower cervical radiculopathy. In comparison with normal reference values established previously, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of F-wave variable abnormalities for predicting lower cervical radiculopathy were low.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a low correlation between F-wave studies and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. The diagnostic utility of multiple F-wave variables in the prediction of cervical radiculopathy was not supported by this study.

Nerve conduction studies in the upper limb in the malwa region-normative data

OBJECTIVE

To establish the normal electrophysiological data for the median and the ulnar nerves in normal healthy adults in the Malwa region of Punjab, India.

METHODS

Nerve conduction studies were performed prospectively in the upper limbs of 100 carefully screened, healthy individuals of either sex, who were between the ages of 20 and 60 years, by using a standardized technique.

RESULTS

Motor studies: The median distal latency (DL) in men was 3.4 (0.2) ms, the amplitude (CMAPA) was 10.80 (2.8) mV, the conduction velocity (MNCV) was 55.6 (2.5) m/s and the F-wave (min latency) was 27.57±2.54(21.5-34.2). In the ulnar nerve , the motor DL was 2.34 (0.25) ms, the amplitude (CMAPA) was 9.8(2.6) mV, MNCV was 63.4 (3.0) m/s and the F-Wave(min latency) was 26.29±2.12(21.6-34.7). In the sensory studies, the median nerve DL was 2.0(0.35) ms, SNCV was 53.4±3.0 m/s and the amplitude (SNAPA)was 59.3 (16.4) μV for men and it was 68.7(28.4) μV for women. For the ulnar nerve in men, the DL was 1.85(0.25)ms, SNCV was 55.5 (4.1) m/s and the amplitude(SNAPA) was 55.5 (18.4) μV for men and it was 64.9 (16.8) μV for women. Only the gender showed a statistically significant effect on the sensory nerve action potential for the median (p < 0.04) and the ulnar nerves (p < 0.041).

CONCLUSION

The normative conduction parameters of the commonly tested nerves in the upper limb were established in our EMG lab. The mean motor nerve conduction parameters for the median and the ulnar nerves correlated favourably with the existing literature data. However, for the sensory nerves, a higher value for the nerve action potential amplitude was demonstrated in this study.

F-waves: neurophysiology and clinical value

This review deals with F responses, which are late responses obtained by supramaximal stimulation of virtually all the motor and mixed peripheral nerves. They are recorded over a muscle innervated by the stimulated nerve. The first description of F-waves was published in the fifties. Their neurophysiological mechanisms have been abundantly discussed in the literature leading to a current consensus, whereby F-waves are considered as antidromic responses produced by a pool of motoneurons activated by peripheral nerve stimulation. In the first part of this review, the neurophysiological mechanisms of F-waves as well as the distinction between these and H reflexes are described from a historical point of view. Other late responses are intentionally not reported; nevertheless A-waves are discussed since they are frequently ill-described in a number of conditions. Stimulation and recording procedures as well as F-wave parameters analysis are detailed, with emphasis on measures most useful for clinical purposes. A rigorous F-wave recording method is mandatory for reliable and meaningful analyses. Physiological factors, which influence F-waves such as ageing, drugs and sleep, must be known and their effects discussed. Also, as maturation is an important factor in clinical neurophysiology, data on F-wave ontogenesis are reviewed and discussed. Finally, the different F-wave alterations described so far in the literature, in either peripheral or central disorders, are listed and commented. It is emphasised that F-waves are particularly useful for the diagnosis of polyneuropathies at a very early stage and for the diagnosis of proximal nerve lesions. F-wave recording is indeed one of the rare methods in routine examination allowing at the same time the functional assessment of motor fibres on their proximal segment, and contributing to the evaluation of motoneuronal excitability.

Symétrie et reproductibilité temporelle des données neurographiques

The aims of the present study are to document side-to-side differences and temporal variability, between two trials (T1 and T2 at a time interval of 3 months) of nerve conduction measurements collected from 30 healthy subjects (mean age 22 +/- 2 years).

METHODS

The protocol at T1 consisted of motor nerve conduction studies of median, ulnar, peroneal and tibial nerves bilaterally, with measurement of (a) motor response size (amplitude and area); (b) terminal latency; (c) minimal, mean and maximal F-wave latency; (d) motor conduction velocity; and (e) F-wave occurrence. T1 also involved sensory nerve conduction studies of median, ulnar, radial, lateral and medial cutaneous, sural and superficial peroneal nerves bilaterally, with measurement of sensory potential size (amplitude and area) and computation of sensory conduction velocity. The protocol at T2 consisted of identical measurements from the dominant side.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

There was a negative relationship between the variability of parameters evaluating nervous conduction and the length of the nerve segment under study. Thus, the smallest side-to-side and temporal variabilities are measured for minimal F-wave latencies (on average 2-3%). The limits of symmetry and temporal variability are particularly useful for diagnosis of unilateral peripheral neuropathy or neurophysiological follow-up of patients with neuropathy, when the variability of the parameter under study is weak and when there is a high correlation between values recorded on the left and on the right or at T1 and T2. This was the case for motor response size of tibial and ulnar nerves, sensory potential size of radial nerve and minimal F-wave latencies from each studied motor nerve.

Provocative F waves may help in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome: a report of three cases

To determine the value of F waves in provocative positions for the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome, we performed provocative maneuvers on three patients with a clinical diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome. The patients had complained of intermittent upper limb pain with associated weakness and paresthesias for several years, and previous evaluations included essentially normal cervical and shoulder imaging studies and electrodiagnostic studies. Although upper limb nerve conduction studies, including ulnar and median F waves, were within normal limits, provocative F waves were obtained in the symptomatic and asymptomatic arm. When routine nerve conduction studies are normal, despite a strong clinical suspicion, provocative maneuvers may help to show subtle electrodiagnostic abnormalities to support the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Reference values of F wave parameters in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

A large reference value database for F wave parameters was constructed with data from 121 to 196 healthy subjects; the age range of the subjects was 14-95 years. We studied the following parameters: minimum F wave latency (FMINLAT), mean F wave latency (FMEANLAT), maximum F wave latency (FMAXLAT), number of F waves/20 stimuli (FNUMBER) and F wave dispersion (FDISP=FMAXLAT-FMINLAT). The median, ulnar, peroneal and tibial nerves were studied.

RESULTS

Height explains almost half of the FMINLAT variability. The F wave latency increases with height in the arms by 0.2 ms/cm and in legs 0.4 ms/cm. The effect of age on F wave latency in the arms is relatively small, only 0.03 ms/year; and in the legs age increases the FMINLAT by 0.1 ms/year. Gender does not affect FMINLAT in a systematic way. The peroneal nerve has slightly longer FMINLAT than the tibial nerve, while the FNUMBER is higher in the tibial nerve than the peroneal nerve. The differences between the ulnar and median nerve are slight. There is a very high correlation between all 3 latency parameters (FMINLAT, FMAXLAT and FMEANLAT), but no correlation between FDISP and FNUMBER and the other parameters. Side to side comparisons reveals no significant differences in any of the parameters except for the median nerve FMINLAT and FMEANLAT, which is 0.2 ms longer on the right than left. If side difference of more than 2 standard deviation is taken as the upper limit for normal, the side difference in arms is 1.4 ms and in legs 3 ms. In repeated studies the interexaminer variability is small; the correlation coefficient between the different F parameters is high (P>0.6 in arms and P>0.7 in legs). In the arms the upper limit for a significant difference of FMINLAT on repeated studies in the median nerve is 1.0 and 1.7 ms for the ulnar nerve. In the legs, FMINLAT for the peroneal nerve is 2.6 ms and for the tibial nerve is 2.1 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

This large reference value database can be used not only to evaluate single measurements in relation with height and age, but also to compare right and left side and changes over time at repeated studies.

Electrodiagnostic approach to patients with weakness

Electrodiagnosis has a key role in the evaluation of patients presenting with weakness. The electrodiagnostician should maintain a broad inclusive differential diagnosis and tailor the examination using a sound conceptual framework. A clear understanding of what is normal provides the proper foundation upon which to judge electrodiagnostic findings. Many peripheral neuromuscular conditions manifest themselves in characteristic ways on NEE and nerve conduction testing, making them identifiable to the skilled electrodiagnostic medicine consultant.

H reflexes and F waves. Fundamentals, normal and abnormal patterns

H reflexes and F waves have become integral parts of the electrodiagnostic examination in general, and nerve conduction studies in particular. They supplement the sensory and motor conduction studies by assessing the entire nerve segments including proximal portions of the motor and sensory axons. H reflexes and F waves have their own advantages and limitations, similarities and differences. These "late" responses are useful in patients with radiculopathies, plexopathies, and peripheral polyneuropathies, including the Guillain-Barre syndrome. They are also helpful in spinal cord disorders.

Electrophysiology of radiculopathies

The anatomy, pathophysiology, and clinical evaluation of radiculopathies are discussed. Defining whether root injury is present and which roots are involved can be difficult but critical for patient management. In conjunction with clinical and radiological information, studies that establish physiological abnormalities of roots should be helpful and important. Clinical neurophysiological studies for radiculopathies are performed frequently but have yet to achieve a universally accepted role in the evaluation of these patients. Electrophysiological techniques for the evaluation of radiculopathies are reviewed. Needle electromyography is the best established of these procedures but has the disadvantage of requiring injury to motor fibers of both a certain degree and distribution. Nerve conduction studies may rarely be abnormal in radiculopathies but are needed to be certain other conditions that may produce similar symptoms and signs are not present. H reflexes and F waves probably have roles in the evaluation of radiculopathies but published reports about F waves in radiculopathies have been marred by inadequate methodology. There is evidence based on large series of patients that somatosensory evoked potentials can be helpful for evaluating patients with multilevel injury such as spinal stenosis, patients where electrophysiological studies may have their greatest clinical utility. Further work using either electrical stimulation with needles or magnetic stimulation of roots seems warranted. The demonstration of meaningful electrophysiological changes with activities that reproduce radicular symptoms may be a promising experimental approach. Available information does not necessarily answer critical questions about the role of electrophysiology in patients with radiculopathies. This cannot be done using analyses based on current ideas about evidence based medicine given the absence of a 'gold standard' for defining radiculopathies as well the absence of blinded studies. The available information provides strong arguments for further investigations evaluating different clinical neurophysiological techniques in the same patient, and for evaluating the value of these techniques by concentrating on their clinical import.

Incidence of F waves in single human thenar motor units

F-wave generation, axon conduction velocities, and contractile properties were compared in 44 healthy individual human thenar motor units. Force and muscle action potentials were recorded when single motor axons were stimulated intraneurally about 10 cm proximal to the elbow. Each stimulus usually evoked only one electromyographic (EMG) potential. However, in seven units (16%), a single stimulus elicited an F wave in response to 1.7 +/- 1.6% (mean +/- SD) of the stimuli applied. Axon conduction velocity proximal to the site of stimulation was faster than distal conduction velocity (72.7 +/- 8.0 m/s versus 64.2 +/- 10.5 m/s). Distal conduction velocities, twitch forces, and contraction times were similar for units that did and did not generate F waves. Thus, no obvious subset of thenar motor units generated F waves. These results provide valuable baseline information on F waves that can be used to assess changes in axon conduction, motor unit contractile properties, and motoneuron excitability in disease.

Tibial nerve F-waves recorded from the abductor hallucis

The purpose of this study was to develop a large database of normal values for the tibial nerve F-wave. A total of 159 asymptomatic subjects without risk factors for neuropathy were recruited and had ten tibial F-waves performed on each leg. Data were collected for the shortest F-wave (Fmin), the mean F-wave (Fmean), and the range of F-waves (Frange). Age, gender, and height were associated with differences in the results. The mean Fmin was 50.8 +/- 5.3 ms. Mean Fmean was 53.0 +/- 5.6 ms and mean Frange was 4.5 +/- 2.4 ms. The mean side-to-side difference for Fmin was 0.6 +/- 2.3 ms and the mean side-to-side difference for Fmean was 0.4 +/- 2.5 ms.

Ulnar nerve F-wave latencies recorded from the abductor digiti minimi

This study was performed to create a large database of normal values for the ulnar F-wave study and to investigate the effect of various demographic factors on F-wave results. The study was designed to incorporate a standard distance measure and temperature control, which are lacking in some previous studies. One hundred ninety-three asymptomatic volunteers without risk factors for neuropathy were recruited and had ten F-waves performed on each arm. Data were collected for the shortest F-wave (Fmin), mean F-wave (Fmean), the number of F-waves present out of ten stimuli (Fpersist), and the range of latencies (Frange). An analysis of variance statistical procedure was applied, and the Fmin and Fmean were found to correlate with age, gender, and height, although the gender effect was relatively weak. For all subjects taken together, the mean Fmin was 26.5 +/- 2.5 ms. The Fmean was 27.7 +/- 2.5 ms, and the mean Frange was 2.6 +/- 1.2 ms. Ninety-seven percent of subjects had an Fpersist of five or more. Mean side-to-side difference for Fmin was 0.2 +/- 1.1 ms.

Peroneal nerve F-wave latencies recorded from the extensor digitorum brevis

This study was performed to create a large database of normal peroneal F-wave latencies. A total of 180 subjects were tested bilaterally and had their shortest (Fmin), mean (Fmean), and latency range (Frange) of F-waves recorded. The number of F-waves present out of ten stimuli (Fpersist) was also recorded. Demographic characteristics were noted and an analysis of variance was performed to determine whether any of these characteristics were associated with different results for the F-wave measures. Age and height, and, to a lesser extent, gender correlated with differences in Fmin, and Fmean, but not Frange. Race and body mass index (weight divided by height squared) were not associated with any differences in results. The mean Fmin was 50.2 +/- 5.5 ms. Mean Fmean was 52.0 +/- 5.6 ms and mean Frange was 4.9 +/- 2.3 ms. Median Fpersist was between 5 and 6. Mean side-to-side difference for Fmin was 0.7 +/- 2.4 ms. All other results are provided in the article. This article presents a database for normal values and the upper limits of normal for Fmin, Fmean, Frange, and side-to-side differences. A low Fpersist does not seem particularly clinically useful for the peroneal nerve, although a high Fpersist seems to be a sign of normality.