Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke

How does combining physical therapy with transcranial direct stimulation improve upper-limb motor functions in patients with stroke? A theory perspective

More than half of stroke survivors suffer from upper-limb dysfunction that persists years after stroke, negatively impacting patients' independence and, therefore, affecting their quality of life. Intense motor rehabilitation is required after a stroke to facilitate motor recovery. More importantly, finding new ways to maximize patients' motor recovery is a core goal of stroke rehabilitation. Thus, researchers have explored the potential benefits of combining the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with physical therapy rehabilitation. Specifically, combining transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) with neurorehabilitation interventions can boost the brain's responses to interventions and maximize the effects of rehabilitation to improve upper-limb recovery post-stroke. However, it is still unclear which modes of tDCS are optimal for upper-limb motor recovery in patients with stroke when combined with physical therapy interventions. Here, the authors review the existing literature suggesting combining physical therapy rehabilitation with tDCS can maximize patients' motor recovery using the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Stroke. The authors focus on two main rehabilitation paradigms, which are constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and Mirror therapy with and without tDCS. The authors also discuss potential studies to elucidate further the benefit of using tDCS adjunct with these upper-limb rehabilitation paradigms and its effectiveness in patients with stroke, with the ultimate goal of maximizing patients' motor recovery.

Voluntary exercise ameliorates the good limb training effect in a mouse model of stroke

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States, making research on rehabilitation imperative. Stroke rehabilitation typically focuses on recovery of the impaired limb, although this process is tedious. Compensatory use of the intact limb after stroke is more efficient, but it is known to negatively impact the impaired limb. Exercise may help with this problem; research has shown that exercise promotes neuronal growth and prevents cell death. This study used a mouse model to investigate if post-stroke exercise could prevent deterioration of the function of the impaired limb despite compensatory training of the intact limb. Results showed that mice that exercised, in combination with intact limb training, demonstrated improved functional outcome compared to mice that received no training or compensatory limb training only. These findings suggest that exercise can prevent the deterioration of impaired limb functional outcome that is typically seen with intact limb use.

Effects of Game-Based Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Balance in Patients with Stroke: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this work were to determine whether game-based constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is effective at improving balance ability in patients with stroke, and to provide clinical knowledge of game-based training that allows application of CIMT to the lower extremities.

DESIGN

Thirty-six patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to game-based CIMT (n = 12), general game-based training (n = 12), and conventional (n = 12) groups. All interventions were conducted 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The static balance control and weight-bearing symmetry were assessed, and the Functional Reach Test (FRT), modified Functional Reach Test (mFRT), and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test were performed to evaluate balance ability.

RESULTS

All 3 groups showed significant improvement in anterior-posterior axis (AP-axis) distance, sway area, weight-bearing symmetry, FRT, mFRT, and TUG test after the intervention (P < 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences in AP-axis, and sway area, weight-bearing symmetry of the game-based CIMT group compared with the other group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the general game-based training and the game-based CIMT both improved on static and dynamic balance ability, game-based CIMT had a larger effect on static balance control, weight-bearing symmetry, and side-to-side weight shift.

Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a constraint mitten, worn on the unaffected upper limb, on the arm and hand function of participants with hemiplegia. To estimate the sample size for a future trial.

Design: An A-B-A design.

Setting: Inpatient, outpatient and domiciliary setting.

Subjects Ten participants with mild to moderate residual upper limb hemiparesis, between 1 and 12 months post stroke.

Intervention: Following a two-week baseline period, 10 participants were advised to wear the constraint mitten on the unaffected upper limb for 9 waking hours/day for two weeks to encourage use of the hemiplegic arm. Existing levels of therapy continued during the whole study.

Main measures: The primary outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test. At the end of the intervention phase participants completed a questionnaire. Participants also recorded their daily use of the constraint mitten during the intervention phase.

Results: A mean improvement in the Action Research Arm Test score of 4.0 points (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 6.2; P=00.016) was found during the intervention phase after correcting for background recovery. Mean compliance was 6.7 hours/day (74%), 90% of participants were positive about the intervention and would recommend the treatment to other stroke survivors, although 50% were relieved to stop the mitten-wearing phase.

Conclusions: The use of a constraint mitten in upper limb stroke rehabilitation may be a useful adjunct to enhance functional recovery with minimal additional resources. The positive findings from this preliminary study warrant a larger randomized controlled trial of 200 participants in total.

Home Forced Use in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Program for Adults with Hemiplegia: A Pilot Study

The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a program of traditional outpatient neurological rehabilitation that included home forced use. In total, 17 patients with chronic stroke and 1 patient with subacute stroke (mean time poststroke = 27.6 months) completed an individualized program consisting of seven 2-hour treatment sessions composed of 1 hour of occupational therapy and 1 hour of physical therapy. Therapy sessions were completed over a 2- to 3-week period and included instruction on the use of a restraining mitt at home during functional activities. The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used to assess upper extremity impairment and function at baseline, midway through treatment, and posttreatment. Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons) in mean time for completion in 12 of 17 WMFT subtasks when comparing baseline to posttreatment. The preliminary results suggest that the forced-use component of constraint-induced therapy may be effective when applied within a traditional outpatient rehabilitation program. However, additional investigation is required to examine the effectiveness of using forced use within typical outpatient rehabilitation under more experimentally controlled conditions.

Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

To determine modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) feasibility and compare its efficacy to traditional rehabilitation (TR) in acute stroke patients exhibiting upper limb hemiparesis. Method. Before-after, multiple baseline, randomized controlled pilot study. Setting. Rehabilitation hospital. Patients. Ten stroke patients < 14 d poststroke and exhibiting upper limb hemiparesis and affected limb nonuse. Interventions. Five patients were administered mCIT, consisting of structured therapy emphasizing more affected arm use in valued activities 3 d/week for 10 weeks and less affected arm restraint 5 d/week for 5 h. Five other patients received 1/2 sessions of traditional motor rehabilitation for the affected arm, which included affected limb manual dexterity exercises and stretching, as well as compensatory strategies with the unaffected limb. The TR regimens occurred 3 d/week for 10 weeks. Main Outcome Measures. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery (Fugl-Meyer), Action Research Arm Test (ARA), and Motor Activity Log (MAL). Results. Before intervention, all patients exhibited stable motor deficits and more affected arm nonuse. After intervention, mCIT patients displayed increased affected arm use (+ 2.43 on the MAL amount of use scale), uniformly exhibited increases on the Fugl-Meyer and ARA (mean change scores = + 18.7 and + 21.7, respectively), and were able to again perform valued activities. TR patients exhibited nominal change in affected limb use (+ 0.07 on the MAL amount of use scale) and modest changes on the Fugl-Meyer and ARA (+ 4.4 and + 4.8, respectively). Fugl-Meyer and ARA changes were significant for the mCIT group only (P < 0.01). Conclusions. mCIT is a promising regimen for improving more affected limb use and function in acute cerebrovascular accident. However, larger confirmatory studies need to be performed.

Validity of body-worn sensor acceleration metrics to index upper extremity function in hemiparetic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Accelerometers have been used to capture real-world use of the paretic upper extremity in people with stroke. It may be possible to characterize different aspects of the recorded acceleration to gain insight about movement capabilities during task-specific behavior. These measures may be of value for guiding rehabilitation. We undertook a study to identify the acceleration characteristics that have a stable association with upper extremity function and sensitivity to within-participant fluctuations in function over multiple sessions of task-specific training.

METHODS

Twenty-seven adults 6 months or more poststroke with upper extremity paresis participated. Signals from wrist-worn accelerometers were sampled at 30 Hz during 7 sessions of task-specific training. Paretic upper extremity function was evaluated with the Action Research Arm Test. We used Spearman correlations to examine within-session associations between acceleration metrics and Action Research Arm Test performance. A mixed model was used to determine which metrics were sensitive to within-participant fluctuations in upper extremity function across the 7 training sessions.

RESULTS

Upper extremity function correlated with bilateral acceleration variability and use ratio during 5 and 6 sessions, respectively. Time accelerating between 76% and 100% of peak acceleration correlated with function in 6 sessions. Variability of the paretic upper extremity acceleration and the ratio of acceleration variability between upper extremities were associated with function during all 7 sessions. Variability in both the acceleration of the paretic upper extremity, and acceleration of the paretic and nonparetic extremities combined were sensitive to within-participant fluctuations in function across training sessions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Multiple features of the acceleration profile track with upper extremity function within and across sessions of task-specific training. It may be possible to monitor these features with accelerometers to index upper extremity function outside of clinical settings.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A91).

The effects of modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice on patients with chronic stroke

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) combined with mental practice (MP) on patients with chronic stroke. [Subjects] The subjects were 26 patients with chronic stroke. [Methods] Patients were randomly assigned to the mCIMT + MP group or the MP group. All subjects were administered mCIT consisting of (1) therapy emphasizing affected arm use in functional activities 5 days/week for 6 weeks and (2) 4 hours of restraint of the less affected arm 5 days/week. The mCIT + MP subjects received 30-minute MP sessions provided directly after therapy sessions. To compare the two groups, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after stroke (FM), and Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) were performed. [Results] Both groups showed significant improvement in ARAT, FM, and K-MBI after the interventions. Also, there were significant difference in ARAT, FM, and K-MBI between the two groups. [Conclusion] mCIT remains a promising intervention. However, its efficacy appears to be enhanced by use of MP after mCIT clinical sessions.

Acceleration metrics are responsive to change in upper extremity function of stroke survivors

OBJECTIVES

To (1) determine whether acceleration metrics derived from monitoring outside of treatment are responsive to change in upper extremity (UE) function; and secondarily to (2) compare metric values during task-specific training and while in the free-living environment, and (3) establish metric associations with an in-clinic measure of movement capabilities.

DESIGN

Before-after observational study.

SETTING

Inpatient hospital (primary purpose); outpatient hospital (secondary purpose).

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals (n=8) with UE hemiparesis <30 days poststroke (primary purpose); individuals (n=27) with UE hemiparesis ≥6 months poststroke (secondary purpose).

INTERVENTION

The inpatient sample was evaluated for UE movement capabilities and monitored with wrist-worn accelerometers for 22 hours outside of treatment before and after multiple sessions of task-specific training. The outpatient sample was evaluated for UE movement capabilities and monitored during a single session of task-specific training and the subsequent 22 hours outside clinical settings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and acceleration metrics quantified from accelerometer recordings.

RESULTS

Five metrics improved in the inpatient sample, along with UE function as measured on the ARAT: use ratio, magnitude ratio, variation ratio, median paretic UE acceleration magnitude, and paretic UE acceleration variability. Metric values were greater during task-specific training than in the free-living environment, and each metric was strongly associated with ARAT score.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple metrics that characterize different aspects of UE movement are responsive to change in function. Metric values are different during training than in the free-living environment, providing further evidence that what the paretic UE does in the clinic may not generalize to what it does in everyday life.

Functional organization and restoration of the brain motor-execution network after stroke and rehabilitation

Multiple cortical areas of the human brain motor system interact coherently in the low frequency range (<0.1 Hz), even in the absence of explicit tasks. Following stroke, cortical interactions are functionally disturbed. How these interactions are affected and how the functional organization is regained from rehabilitative treatments as people begin to recover motor behaviors has not been systematically studied. We recorded the intrinsic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals from 30 participants: 17 young healthy controls and 13 aged stroke survivors. Stroke participants underwent mental practice (MP) or both mental practice and physical therapy (MP+PT) within 14-51 days following stroke. We investigated the network activity of five core areas in the motor-execution network, consisting of the left primary motor area (LM1), the right primary motor area (RM1), the left pre-motor cortex (LPMC), the right pre-motor cortex (RPMC) and the supplementary motor area (SMA). We discovered that (i) the network activity dominated in the frequency range 0.06-0.08 Hz for all the regions, and for both able-bodied and stroke participants (ii) the causal information flow between the regions: LM1 and SMA, RPMC and SMA, RPMC and LM1, SMA and RM1, SMA and LPMC, was reduced significantly for stroke survivors (iii) the flow did not increase significantly after MP alone and (iv) the flow among the regions during MP+PT increased significantly. We also found that sensation and motor scores were significantly higher and correlated with directed functional connectivity measures when the stroke-survivors underwent MP+PT but not MP alone. The findings provide evidence that a combination of mental practice and physical therapy can be an effective means of treatment for stroke survivors to recover or regain the strength of motor behaviors, and that the spectra of causal information flow can be used as a reliable biomarker for evaluating rehabilitation in stroke survivors.

Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy: A Promising Restorative Outpatient Therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stroke is the leading cause of disability in the United States, and upper limb hemiparesis is a primary impairment resulting in this disability. However, there remains a paucity of scientifically validated treatment regimens for hemiparesis. Data from randomized controlled studies suggest the effectiveness and efficacy of modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT), a reimbursable, outpatient, upper limb training regimen. The purpose of this article is to review evidence and discuss the theoretical bases of mCIT for stroke-induced hemiparesis. The objective is to make stroke practitioners aware of the mCIT theoretical bases and of this clinically practical, efficacious protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

mCIT is solidly grounded in motor learning principles, is practical and safe, and is both efficacious and effective. mCIT studies have shown efficacy using rigorous randomized controlled methods in both subacute and chronic stroke and have shown high effect sizes that have been independently confirmed. It thus seems reasonable to recommend mCIT for clinical application.

Motor Recovery Strategies After Stroke

Impaired motor function after stroke is a major cause of disability in young stroke survivors. The plasticity of the adult human brain provides opportunities to enhance traditional rehabilitation programs for these individuals. Younger stroke patients appear to have a greater ability to recover from stroke and are likely to benefit substantially from treatments that facilitate plasticity-mediated recovery. The use of new exercise treatments, such as constraint-induced movement therapy, robot-aided rehabilitation, and partial body weight supported treadmill training are being studied intensively and are likely to ultimately be incorporated into standard poststroke rehabilitation. Medications to enhance recovery, growth factors, and stem cells will also be components of rehabilitation for the young stroke survivor in the foreseeable future.

Examining the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in Canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy.

METHOD

An online survey was completed by occupational and physical therapists practising in Canadian adult neurological rehabilitation. We measured participants' practices, perceptions, and opinions in relation to their use of CIMT in clinical practice.

RESULTS

A total of 338 surveys were returned for a 13% response rate; 92% of respondents knew of CIMT, and 43% reported using it. The majority (88%) of respondents using CIMT employed a non-traditional protocol. Self-rating of level of CIMT knowledge was found to be a significant predictor of CIMT use (p≤0.001). Commonly identified barriers to use included "patients having cognitive challenges that prohibit use of this treatment" and "lack of knowledge regarding treatment."

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of respondents knew about CIMT, less than half reported using it. Barriers to CIMT use include lack of knowledge about the treatment and institutional resources to support its use. Identifying and addressing barriers to CIMT use-for example, by using continuing professional education to remediate knowledge gaps or developing new protocols that require fewer institutional resources-can help improve the feasibility of CIMT, and thus promote its clinical application.

Effect of functional electrical stimulation with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function in poststroke patients

BACKGROUND

Motor recovery of the upper extremity in stroke patients is an important goal of rehabilitation. In particular, motor recovery can be accelerated when physical and cognitive interventions are combined. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) with mirror therapy (MT) on motor function of upper extremity in stroke patients.

METHODS

Twenty-seven stroke patients were recruited, and the 23 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the experimental group (n = 12) and the control group (n = 11). Both groups received conventional rehabilitation training for 60 minutes/day and 5 days/week for 4 weeks. In addition, members of the experimental group received FES with MT and members of the control group received FES without MT for 30 minutes/day and 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Immediately before and after intervention, motor recovery was measured using the Fugl-Meyer (FM) assessment, Brunnstrom's motor recovery stage (BMRS), the Manual Function Test (MFT), and the Box and Block Test (BBT).

RESULTS

Significant upper extremity motor improvements were observed in the experimental and control groups according to the FM, BMRS, MFT, and BBT (P < .05). In particular, FM subscores for wrist, hand, and co-ordination and MFT subscores for hand function were more significantly improved in the experimental group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Motor functions of the upper extremity were improved by FES with MT versus controls. The study shows that FES with MT during poststroke rehabilitation may effectively improve motor functions of the upper extremity.

Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making

The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive approach for assessing the upper extremity (UE) after stroke. First, common UE impairments and how to assess them are briefly discussed. Although multiple UE impairments are typically present after stroke, the severity of one's impairment, paresis, is the primary determinant of UE functional loss. Second, UE function is operationally defined and a number of clinical measures are discussed. It is important to consider how impairment and loss of function affect UE activity outside of the clinical environment. Thus, this review also identifies accelerometry as an objective method for assessing UE activity in daily life. Finally, the role that each of these levels of assessment should play in clinical decision making is discussed to optimize the provision of stroke rehabilitation services.

Facilitation of corticospinal excitability according to motor imagery and mirror therapy in healthy subjects and stroke patients

Objective

To delineate the changes in corticospinal excitability when individuals are asked to exercise their hand using observation, motor imagery, voluntary exercise, and exercise with a mirror.

Method

The participants consisted of 30 healthy subjects and 30 stroke patients. In healthy subjects, the amplitudes and latencies of motor evoked potential (MEP) were obtained using seven conditions: (A) rest; (B) imagery; (C) observation and imagery of the hand activity of other individuals; (D) observation and imagery of own ipsilateral hand activity; (E) observation and imagery of the hand activity of another individual with a mirror; (F) observation and imagery of own symmetric ipsilateral hand activity (thumb abduction) with a mirror; and (G) observation and imagery of own asymmetric ipsilateral hand activity (little finger abduction) with a mirror. In stroke patients, MEPs were obtained in the A, C, D, E, F conditions.

Results

In both groups, increment of the percentage MEP amplitude (at rest) and latency decrement of MEPs were significantly higher during the observation of the activity of the hand of another individual with a mirror and during symmetric ipsilateral hand activity on their own hand with a mirror than they were without a mirror. In healthy subjects, the increment of percentage MEP amplitude and latency decrement were significantly higher during the observation of the symmetric ipsilateral hand activity with a mirror compared to the observation of the activity of the asymmetric ipsilateral hand with a mirror of their own hand.

Conclusion

In both groups, corticospinal excitability was facilitated by viewing the mirror image of the activity of the ipsilateral hand. These findings provide neurophysiological evidence supporting the application of various mirror imagery programs during stroke rehabilitation.

Group Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Motor and Functional Outcomes in Individuals with Stroke

Background

Strokes frequently cause limitations of the upper extremity and in performance of activities of daily living (ADL). Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is designed to enhance the use of the hemiplegic arm.

Purpose

To assess the effects of group CIMT on upper-extremity motor function and performance level of motor and process skills for instrumental activities in daily living (IADL) in community-dwelling individuals whose stroke occurred at least six months earlier.

Methods

Eight adults with stroke participated in this study. Group-based CIMT was administered for two weeks, five times per week, with two-hour intensive daily training.

Findings

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) scores improved after intervention.

Implications

The results of this study suggest that relatively brief group-based CIMT may be an effective intervention for improving motor function of the affected upper-limb and the level of IADL in individuals who have had stroke.

Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke

BACKGROUND

Functional limitation of the upper extremities is common in patients with stroke. An upper-extremity measure with sound psychometric properties is indispensable for clinical and research use.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of 4 clinical measures for assessing upper-extremity motor function in people with stroke: the upper-extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Test (UE-FM), the upper-extremity subscale of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Wolf Motor Function Test.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, longitudinal study.

METHODS

Fifty-three people with stroke were evaluated with the 4 measures at 4 time points (14, 30, 90, and 180 days after stroke). Thirty-five participants completed all of the assessments. The ceiling and floor effects, validity (concurrent validity and predictive validity), and responsiveness of each measure were examined. Interrater reliability and test-retest reliability also were examined.

RESULTS

All measures, except for the UE-FM, had significant floor effects or ceiling effects at one or more time points. The Spearman rho correlation coefficient for each pair of the 4 measures was > or =.81, indicating high concurrent validity. The predictive validity of the 4 measures was satisfactory (Spearman rho, > or =.51). The responsiveness of the 4 measures at 14 to 180 days after stroke was moderate (.52 < or = effect size < or = .79). The 4 measures had good interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], > or =.92) and test-retest reliability (ICC, > or =.97). Only the minimal detectable changes of the UE-FM (8% of the highest possible score) and the ARAT (6%) were satisfactory.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size was too small to conduct data analysis according to type or severity of stroke. In addition, the timed component of the Wolf Motor Function Test was not used in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 measures showed sufficient validity, responsiveness, and reliability in participants with stroke. The UE-FM for assessing impairment and the ARAT for assessing disability had satisfactory minimal detectable changes, supporting their utility in clinical settings.

Effects of forced use on arm function in the subacute phase after stroke: a randomized, clinical pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Following stroke, it is common to exhibit motor impairments and decreased use of the upper limb. The objective of the present study was to evaluate forced use on arm function during the subacute phase after stroke.

DESIGN

A comparison of standard rehabilitation only and standard rehabilitation together with a restraining sling was made through a randomized, nonblinded, clinical pilot trial with assessments before intervention, after intervention, and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups.

SETTING

The present study took place at the departments of rehabilitation medicine, geriatrics, and neurology at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 30 people 1 to 6 months (mean, 2.4 mo) after stroke was randomized into 2 groups (forced-use group and standard training group) of 15 people each. Twenty-six participants completed the 3-month follow-up.

INTERVENTION

All participants received their standard rehabilitation program with training 5 days per week for 2 weeks as inpatients or outpatients. The forced-use group also wore a restraining sling on the nonparetic arm with a target of 6 hours per day.

MEASUREMENTS

The Fugl-Meyer (FM) test, the Action Research Arm Test, the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) (sum of scores for the upper limb), a 16-hole peg test (16HPT), a grip strength ratio (paretic hand to nonparetic hand), and the Modified Ashworth Scale were used to obtain measurements.

RESULTS

The changes in the forced-use group did not differ from the changes in the standard training group for any of the outcome measures. Both groups improved over time, with statistically significant changes in the FM test (mean score changed from 52 to 57), MAS (mean score changed from 10.1 to 12.4), 16HPT (mean time changed from >92 seconds to 60 seconds), and grip strength ratio (mean changed from 0.40 to 0.55).

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this pilot study include an extended study time, a nonblinded assessor, a lack of control of treatment content, and a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present pilot study did not support forced use as a reinforcement of standard rehabilitation in the subacute phase after stroke. Forced use did not generate greater improvements with regard to motor impairment and capacity than standard rehabilitation alone. The findings of this effectiveness study will be used to help design future clinical trials with the aim of revealing a definitive conclusion regarding the clinical implementation of forced use for upper-limb rehabilitation.

Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) is an outpatient therapy encouraging repetitive, task-specific practice with the affected arm. mCIT has shown efficacy in all stages poststroke. Given its efficacy when combined with other therapy regimens, the current study examined the efficacy of mental practice when combined with mCIT versus mCIT only using randomized, controlled methods.

METHOD

Ten patients with chronic stroke (7 males; mean age, 61.4+/-3.02 years; age range, 48 to 79 years; mean time since stroke, 28.5 months; range, 13 to 42 months) exhibiting stable, affected arm motor deficits were administered mCIT, consisting of: (1) structured therapy emphasizing affected arm use in functional activities 3 days/week for 10 weeks; and (2) less affected arm restraint 5 days/week for 5 hours. Both of these components were administered during a 10-week period. Subjects randomly assigned to the mCIT+mental practice experimental condition also received 30-minute mental practice sessions provided directly after therapy sessions. These mental practice sessions required daily cognitive rehearsal of the activities of daily living practiced during mCIT clinical sessions.

RESULTS

No pre-existing differences were found between groups on any demographic variable or movement scale. All subjects exhibited marked reductions in affected arm impairment and functional limitation. However, subjects in the mCIT+mental practice group exhibited significantly larger changes on both movement measures after intervention: Action Research Arm Test, +15.4-point change versus +8.4-point change for mCIT only subjects (P<0.001); Fugl-Meyer, +7.8-point change versus +4.1-point change for the mCIT only subjects (P=0.01). These changes were sustained 3 months after intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

mCIT remains a promising motor intervention. However, its efficacy appears to be enhanced by use of mental practice provided directly after mCIT clinical sessions.

A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: To determine the efficacy of activity-based therapies using arm ergometer or robotic or group occupational therapy for motor recovery of the paretic arm in patients with an acute stroke (≤4 weeks) admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, and to obtain information to plan a large randomized controlled trial.

Design: Prospective, randomized controlled study.

Setting: Stroke unit in a rehabilitation hospital.

Subjects: Thirty patients with an acute stroke (≤4 weeks) who had arm weakness (Medical Research Council grade 2 or less at the shoulder joint).

Intervention: Occupational therapy (OT) group (control) (n = 10), arm ergometer (n = 10) or robotic (n = 10) therapy group. All patients received standard, inpatient, post-stroke rehabilitation training for 3 hours a day, plus 12 additional 40-minute sessions of the activity-based therapy.

Main measures: The primary outcome measures were discharge scores in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale for upper limb impairment, Motor Status Scale, total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and FIM-motor and FIM-cognition subscores.

Results: The three groups (OT group versus arm ergometer versus robotic) were comparable on clinical demographic measures except the robotic group was significantly older and there were more haemorrhagic stroke patients in the arm ergometer group. After adjusting for age, stroke type and outcome measures at baseline, a similar degree of improvement in the discharge scores was found in all of the primary outcome measures.

Conclusion: This study suggests that activity-based therapies using an arm ergometer or robot when used over shortened training periods have the same effect as OT group therapy in decreasing impairment and improving disability in the paretic arm of severely affected stroke patients in the subacute phase.

Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This single-blinded randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of a reimbursable, outpatient, modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) protocol (half-hour therapy sessions occurring 3 days per week in which subjects used the more affected arm combined with less affected arm restriction 5 days per week for 5 hours; both of these regimens were administered during a 10-week period) with that of a time-matched exercise program for the more affected arm or a no-treatment control regimen.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-five subjects with chronic stroke participated in the study.

METHODS

The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke (FM), and Motor Activity Log (MAL) were administered to the subjects.

RESULTS

After intervention, significant differences were observed on the ARAT and MAL Amount of Use and Quality of Movement scales, all in favor of the mCIT group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The data affirm previous findings suggesting that this reimbursable, outpatient protocol increases more affected arm use and function. Magnitude of changes was consistent with those reported in more intense protocols, such as constraint-induced therapy.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To test the potential adjuvant effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor learning in a group of stroke survivors undergoing constraint-induced therapy (CIT) for upper-limb hemiparesis.

DESIGN

This was a prospective randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel group study. Nineteen individuals, one or more years poststroke, were randomized to either a rTMS + CIT (n = 9) or a sham rTMS + CIT (n = 10) group and participated in the 2-wk intervention.

RESULTS

Regardless of group assignment, participants demonstrated significant gains on the primary outcome measures: the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and the Motor Activity Log (MAL)--Amount of Use, and on secondary outcome measures including the Box and Block Test (BBT) and the MAL--How Well. Participants receiving rTMS failed to show differential improvement on either primary outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study provided further evidence that even relatively brief sessions of CIT can have a substantial effect, it provided no support for adjuvant use of rTMS.

Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse "learned"? and other quandaries

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has gained considerable popularity as a valuable treatment for a hemiparetic upper extremity. This approach is compatible with the emerging notion that task-oriented or functionally oriented retraining of the impaired limb provides evidence to support its utility. This article first provides a historical perspective on the development of CIMT. An overview model of how learned nonuse of the hemiparetic limb occurs and can be overcome with CIMT is discussed, and then a more detailed model that incorporates critical issues requiring considerably more basic and applied scientific exploration is described. Among the issues considered are the extent to which hemiparetic limb nonuse and subsequent modes of delivery to overcome it are governed by structure-function deficits rather than being attributable primarily to behavioral phenomena; the relative importance of the intensity of training; the need to better balance unimanual and bimanual upper-extremity task practice; the role of psychosocial and cultural factors in fostering patient compliance; the optimization of modes of delivery; and the reevaluation of the constellation of components contributing to successful outcomes with this treatment. Finally, the strengths, uncertainties, and limitations associated with CIMT are examined.

Modified constraint-induced therapy extension: using remote technologies to improve function

OBJECTIVE

To determine efficacy of a modified constraint-induced therapy extension (mCITE) protocol, in which persons with stroke participated in therapy sessions via the Internet.

DESIGN

Pre-post, single-blinded case series.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Four people with stroke who experienced stroke more than 1 year prior to study entry exhibiting upper-limb hemiparesis and nonuse.

INTERVENTION

Subjects participated in online, 30-minute therapy sessions, 3 times a week for 10 weeks using personal computer-based cameras and free network meeting software. During the same period, subjects' less affected hands and wrists were restrained every weekday for 5 hours. Patients completed online logs to document restraint use and activities practiced at home.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Motor Activity Log (MAL) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). We also used a structured interview to ask patients about their satisfaction with the protocol.

RESULTS

After intervention, subjects exhibited marked improvements in more affected arm use (+2.7, +2.06, +1.7, +2,83, respectively), quality of movement (+2.1, +2.1, +2.03, +1.9, respectively), as measured by the MAL, and speed increases while performing WMFT tasks. Subjects' mCITE satisfaction and adherence were high, and motor changes translated to ability to perform valued activities.

CONCLUSIONS

A home-based, modified constraint-induced movement therapy program is feasible and appears to increase more affected arm use and function using commercially available, inexpensive technologies.

Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment: a validation study

Monitoring upper-limb activity in a free-living environment is important for the evaluation of rehabilitation. This study is a validation of the Strathclyde Upper-Limb Activity Monitor (SULAM) which records the vertical movement and position of each wrist, and assesses bimanual movement. Agreement between the SULAM and two independent video observers was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Concurrent validity was very good for movement of each upper-limb (ICC > 0.9), and good for the vertical position of the wrist (ICC > 0.8 for wrist positions below the shoulder, ICC > 0.6 otherwise). The ICC was good (>0.8) for bimanual movement, however the SULAM systematically underreported this by approximately 15%. The SULAM could be a useful tool to assess upper-limb activity of clinical populations in their usual environment.

Modified constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke exhibiting minimal movement ability in the affected arm

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a reimbursable, outpatient modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) protocol administered to subjects with chronic stroke who initially exhibited minimal movement ability in their affected wrists and fingers.

SUBJECTS

The subjects were 4 individuals who had experienced a stroke more than 1 year prior to study entry (mean age [+/-SD]=60.25+/-1.98 years, mean time since stroke=37.5+/-23.2 months).

METHOD

A multiple-baseline, preintervention-postintervention, single-blinded case series design was used. The intervention consisted of structured, 1/2-hour therapy sessions emphasizing affected arm use in valued activities, occurring 3 times per week for 10 weeks. Subjects' less affected arms also were restrained 5 days per week for 5 hours per day during the same 10-week period. The main outcome measures were the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Motor Activity Log (MAL), and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery (FM).

RESULTS

The subjects exhibited improvements in use of the more affected arm (+1.9, +1.8, +1.7, and +2.3 for subjects 1 through 4, respectively) and in quality of movement (+1.5, +2.1, +1.63, and +1.9 for subjects 1 through 4, respectively), as measured by the MAL. They also exhibited reduced impairment, as measured by the FM (+5.0, +6.5, +5.5, and +5.0 for subjects 1 through 4, respectively), and increased fine motor skill movement, as measured by the ARAT (+7.5, +7.0, +7.0, and +5.5 for subjects 1 through 4, respectively).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrated that mCIT participation was efficacious because it led to increased use of the affected arm and of function and to increased ability to perform valued activities. The subjects reported some new ability to perform some valued activities. These outcomes are significant because few therapies are believed to effectively increase use of the affected arm and function in this population.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Elderly Stroke Survivors: Changes in Motor Impairment, Daily Functioning, and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

To examine the benefits of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on motor function, daily function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in elderly stroke survivors.

DESIGN

Two-group randomized controlled trial, with pretreatment and posttreatment measures.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six elderly stroke patients (mean age, 72 y) with 0.5 to 31 months postonset of a first-ever cerebrovascular accident.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-six patients received either mCIMT (restraint of the unaffected limb combined with intensive training of the affected limb) or traditional rehabilitation for a period of 3 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), FIM instrument, Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). The FMA evaluated the severity of motor impairment; the FIM instrument and MAL reported daily function; and the SIS detected HRQOL.

RESULTS

The mCIMT group exhibited significantly greater improvements in motor function, daily function, and the physical domain of HRQOL than the traditional rehabilitation group. Patients in the mCIMT group perceived significantly greater percent of recovery after treatment than patients in the traditional rehabilitation group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest mCIMT is a promising intervention for improving motor function, daily function, and physical aspects of HRQOL in elderly patients with stroke. The mCIMT was well tolerated by the elderly patients even though it is a rigorous training program.

Measuring continuous real-world upper-limb activity

The Strathclyde Upper-Limb Activity Monitor (SULAM) was used to assess real-world upper-limb activity. The SULAM consists of an electro-hydraulic activity-sensor which measures the vertical displacement of the wrist in relation to the shoulder. The aims of this study were to obtain a profile of upper-limb activity in two different populations (able-bodied participants and stroke patients) Ten able-bodied volunteers and ten stroke patients-wore the SULAM while performing their everyday activities. The outcome measures were movement time, its distribution in five vertical ranges, bimanual and unimanual movement time. There was a difference in the use of both upper-limbs for both groups, favouring the dominant/unaffected arm. This difference was only in two of the five ranges (chest to shoulder and shoulder to head for able-bodied participants; waist to chest and chest to shoulder for stroke patients). Bimanual movement was greater than unimanual movement for able-bodied participants whereas unimanual movement was greater than bimanual movement for stroke patients.

Pain, fatigue, and intensity of practice in people with stroke who are receiving constraint-induced movement therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is little available information about changes in pain and fatigue status among people receiving constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy). This study examined such changes.

SUBJECTS

All participants were a subset of individuals with stroke enrolled in the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial and received 2 weeks of CI therapy either 3 to 9 months after stroke (subacute therapy group, n=18) or 1 year later (chronic therapy group, n=14).

METHODS

Pain, fatigue, and intensity of therapy were evaluated. The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and the pain scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity were administered before and after training. Single-item measures for pain and fatigue were administered twice daily during therapy.

RESULTS

All participants reported low mean pain (X=2.0, SD=0.93) and fatigue (X=2.7, SD=1.23) scores. Generally, differences between the subacute and the chronic therapy groups for pain, fatigue, intensity, and WMFT change scores were nonsignificant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

For selected patients with stroke, the intensive practice associated with CI therapy may be administered without exacerbation of pain or fatigue, even early during the recovery process.

Quantitative Assessment of Recovery from Motor Hemineglect in Acute Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Motor hemineglect is characterized by an underutilization of one side of the body. It is a higher-order motor disorder that resembles hemiplegia although being substantially different from it due to a preserved motor output system. Its role for poststroke recovery is still unclear.

METHODS

We studied 52 patients presenting with acute hemiparetic stroke over the first 7 days after symptom onset. Nineteen patients had unilateral motor hemineglect. Impairment was clinically assessed with the European Stroke Scale and a multifactorial motor score. It was further assessed quantitatively, as overall arm activity was measured continuously by Actiwatches. Lesion volumes were measured morphometrically within 24 h on perfusion- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images and on average on day 9 by T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Patients with motor hemineglect were characterized by significantly reduced initial arm activity in comparison to patients without motor hemineglect. This was paralleled by larger brain lesions in the patients with motor hemineglect. Patients with motor neglect either recovered virtually completely (5 cases; 2/5 left hemisphere; 3/5 treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rt-PA) within 7 days or did not improve at all (14 cases; 3/14 left hemisphere; 3/14 rt-PA treated).

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal a high incidence of motor hemineglect in patients with acute stroke. They further show that these patients are more severely compromised than those without motor hemineglect. A rapid and near complete recovery was observed in about one fourth of the motor hemineglect patients and may be related to involvement of the left hemisphere or to therapy with thrombolysis.

The effectiveness of constraint-induced therapy as a stroke intervention: a meta-analysis

Stroke is one of the most disabling conditions affecting adults today. Much research has been performed on rehabilitation interventions targeting hemiparesis after stroke. Constraint-induced therapy is a treatment technique that focuses on restraining the unaffected upper extremity while forcing use of the affected extremity to promote purposeful movement. This study presents a meta-analysis of applicable current literature on this treatment approach. It is concluded that constraint-induced therapy may be an effective treatment option for hemiparesis experienced after stroke.

Quantification of index tapping regularity after stroke with tri-axial accelerometry

OBJECTIVE

Quantifying intrinsic components of movement may help to better understand the nature of motor deficits after stroke. Here we quantify the ability of stroke patients to finger tap in rhythm with auditory cues given at physiological rate.

METHODS

Using tri-axial accelerometry, we measured tapping regularity (Regularity Index) during auditory-cued index-to-thumb tapping at 1.25 Hz in 20 prospectively selected right-handed chronic stroke patients (mean age 61 yrs) and 20 right-handed healthy subjects (7 young and 13 age matched; mean age 24 and 58 yrs, respectively). With the aim to validate our method, two measures of clinical deficit, the European Stroke Scale (ESS) and the maximum number of index-thumb taps in 15s (IT-Max) were recorded on the same day.

RESULTS

There was no effect of age or hand used on the Regularity Index in the control subjects. In patients, the Regularity Index of their affected hand was significantly worse compared to their unaffected hand and to age-matched controls (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The Regularity Index significantly correlated with the ESS and IT-Max in the clinically expected direction (p=0.025 and 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that our method has validity to quantify finger-tapping regularity. After stroke, there is a deficit in the ability to keep pace with auditory cues that correlates, but does not equate, with other indices of motor function. Quantifying tapping regularity may provide novel insights into the mechanisms underlying recovery of finger dexterity after stroke.

Efficacy of Forced-Use Therapy in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of forced-use therapy (FUT) on the improvement of upper-extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP).

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Outpatient ambulatory clinic in South Korea.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one patients with hemiplegic CP were assigned to the FUT group (n=18) or to the control group (n=13). The mean age of the patients in the FUT group was 33.2 months and in the control group it was 43.2 months.

INTERVENTIONS

The FUT group wore a short-arm Scotchcast on the unaffected arm for 6 weeks and also participated in a conventional rehabilitation program that included stretching exercises and functional occupational therapy for the upper extremity. The control group underwent the conventional rehabilitation program only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Hand function tests, including the box and block test (BBT), Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment (EDPA), and WeeFIM instrument taken before and after 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference between groups in the BBT, EDPA, and WeeFIM scores. After 6 weeks of treatment, however, the FUT group showed significant improvement in the affected arm in the BBT and EDPA scores, compared with the control group (P<.05). The self-care score on the WeeFIM was also significantly improved in the FUT group (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FUT combined with a conventional rehabilitation program appears to be more effective than a rehabilitation program alone in improving affected hand function in children with hemiplegic CP.

Active Finger Extension Predicts Outcomes After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Individuals With Hemiparesis After Stroke

Background and Purpose— Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a rehabilitative strategy used primarily with the post-stroke population to increase the functional use of the neurologically weaker upper extremity through massed practice while restraining the lesser involved upper extremity. Whereas research evidence supports CIMT, limited evidence exists regarding the characteristics of individuals who benefit most from this intervention. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential of 5 measures to predict functional CIMT outcomes.

Methods— A convenience sample of 55 individuals, >6 months after stroke, was recruited that met specific inclusion/exclusion criteria allowing for individuals whose upper extremity was mildly to severely involved. They participated in CIMT 6 hours per day. Pretest, post-test, and follow-up assessments were performed to assess the outcomes for the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The potential predictors were minimal motor criteria (active extension of the wrist and 3 fingers), active finger extension/grasp release, grip strength, Fugl–Meyer upper extremity motor score, and the Frenchay score. A step-wise regression analysis was used in which the potential predictors were entered in a linear regression model with simultaneous entry of the dependent variables’ pretest score as the covariate. Two regressions models were determined for the dependent variable, for immediate post-test, and for follow-up post-test.

Results— Finger extension was the only significant predictor of WMFT outcomes.

Conclusions— When using finger extension/grasp release as a predictor in the regression equations, one can predict individual’s follow-up scores for CIMT. This experiment provides the most comprehensive investigation of predictors of CIMT outcomes to date.

Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of a mental practice (MP) protocol in increasing the function and use of the more affected limb in stroke patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, multiple baseline, pre-post, case series.

SETTING

Outpatient rehabilitation hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven patients who had a stroke more than 1 year before study entry (9 men; mean age, 62.3+/-5.1 y; range, 53-71 y; mean time since stroke, 23.8 mo; range, 15-48 mo; 10 strokes exhibiting upper-limb hemiparesis on the dominant side) and who exhibited affected arm hemiparesis and nonuse.

INTERVENTION

All patients received 30-minute therapy sessions 2 days a week for 6 weeks. The sessions emphasized activities of daily living (ADLs): 6 subjects randomly assigned to the MP condition concurrently received sessions requiring daily MP of the ADLs; 5 subjects (control group) received an intervention consisting of relaxation techniques.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Motor Activity Log and Action Research Arm (ARA) test.

RESULTS

Affected limb use as rated by MP patients and their caregivers increased (1.55, 1.66, respectively), as did patient and caregiver ratings of quality of movement (2.33, 2.15, respectively) and ARA scores (10.7). In contrast, the controls showed nominal increases in the amount they used their affected limb and in limb function. A Wilcoxon test on the ARA scores revealed significantly ( P =.004) greater changes in the MP group's scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in an MP protocol may increase a stroke patient's use of his/her more affected limb. Data further support that the protocol resulted in correlative, MP-induced, motor function improvements. The mechanisms whereby MP increases affected arm use are unknown. Perhaps using the more affected limb becomes more salient through MP, or perhaps motor schema are altered during MP to integrate limb use.

Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated

Termination of motor rehabilitation is often recommended as patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) become more chronic and/or when they fail to respond positively to motor rehabilitation (commonly termed a "plateau"). Managed-care programs frequently reinforce this practice by restricting care to patients responding to therapy and/or to the most acute patients. When neuromuscular adaptation occurs in exercise, rather than terminating the current regimen, a variety of techniques (eg, modifying intensity, attempting different modalities) are used to facilitate neuromuscular adaptations. After presenting the concepts of the motor recovery plateau and adaptation, we similarly posit that patients with CVA adapt to therapeutic exercise but that this is not indicative of a diminished capacity for motor improvement. Instead, like traditional exercise circumstances, adaptive states can be overcome by modifying regimen aspects (eg, intensity, introducing new exercises). Findings suggesting that patients with chronic CVA can benefit from motor rehabilitation programs that apply novel or different parameters and modalities. The objectives of this commentary are to (1) to encourage practitioners to reconsider the notion of the motor recovery plateau, (2) to reconsider chronic CVA patients' ability to recover motor function, and (3) to use different modalities when accommodation is exhibited.