First International Pharmacoeconomic Conference on Alzheimer's Disease: report and summary

Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Healthcare Resources Used in Patients Hospitalized with Alzheimer's Disease with at Least One Procedure: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample

We assessed trends, predictors and outcomes of resource utilization in hospital inpatient discharges with a principal diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with at least one procedure. Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (NIS, 2002-2012), discharges primarily diagnosed with AD, aged ≥60 y and with ≥1 procedure, were selected (Weighted N = 92,300). Hospital resource utilization were assessed using ICD-9-CM codes, while hospitalization outcomes included total charges (TC, 2012$), length of stay (LOS, days), and mortality risk (MR, %). Brain and respiratory/gastrointestinal procedure utilization both dropped annually by 3-7%, while cardiovascular procedures/evaluations, blood evaluations, blood transfusion, and resuscitation ("CVD/Blood") as well as neurophysiological and psychological evaluation and treatment ("Neuro") procedures increased by 5-8%. Total charges, length of stay, and mortality risk were all markedly higher with use of respiratory/gastrointestinal procedures as opposed to being reduced with use of "Brain" procedures. Procedure count was positively associated with all three hospitalization outcomes. In sum, patterns of hospital resources that were used among AD inpatients changed over-time, and were associated with hospitalization outcomes such as total charges, length of stay, and mortality risk.

The economic impact of galantamine vs placebo: an analysis based on functional capacity in a Swedish cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the economic impact of galantamine, based on basic activities of daily living (ADL).

METHODS

Data were derived from Swedish patients enrolled in a 6-month placebo-controlled trial of galantamine (GAL-INT-1; n=80), and from the Kungsholmen-Nordanstig Project, a longitudinal study of 919 elderly persons in Sweden. Basic ADL were assessed using the Katz' Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (number of ADL lost [dependency in 0, 1-2, 3-4, or 5-6 ADL]). Costs were appraised based on regression analysis and on costs directly linked to ADL. Six-month costs for galantamine and placebo were calculated.

RESULTS

In the regression analyses, each increase in a Katz stage was associated with an annual cost increase of SEK 81,415-83,683 (∼€8000). Results were similar using stage-specific costs. Overall, there was a small, non-significant numerical cost benefit for galantamine indicating cost neutrality.

LIMITATIONS

The small number of Swedish patients in the GAL-INT-1 study, which was not powered for economic outcomes, limits the statistical power of the analysis. In addition, long-term outcomes are difficult to assess in persons with dementia because of practical and logistical problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of galantamine in patients with AD can be achieved with no increase in cost. Combined with positive effects in terms of outcome, treatment with galantamine can be regarded as cost-effective using a cost-consequence approach.

Cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a review with methodological considerations

Cholinesterase inhibitors have been available for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease since 1993. They have significantly positive effects on cognitive functioning and other domains of functional capacity, such as activities of daily life in terms of efficacy, but the clinical value of these effects are under discussion. Cholinesterase inhibitors may also influence behavioural and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer's disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors are also regarded as rather expensive and, therefore, the question of cost effectiveness is essential. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of cholinesterase inhibitors have so far been conducted in retrospect on efficacy data from prospective randomised clinical trials combined with economic data from other sources. There are no published specific cost-effectiveness studies of cholinesterase inhibitors which prospectively collected empirical data on costs and outcomes. There is only one published randomised clinical trial with such empirical data with a cost consequence analysis design, indicating cost neutrality. Several types of models to describe the long-term effects have been published, indicating cost effectiveness. However, due to methodological considerations, the validity of these models is difficult to judge. A research agenda for the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors is proposed, including long-term studies with empirical data on resource use, costs and outcomes, studies on quality of life, informal care and behavioural and psychological symptoms, combination and comparative studies on mild cognitive impairment.

The Needs of the Caregiver in the Long-Term Treatment of Alzheimer Disease

The long-term well-being of caregivers should be included as part of the treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Throughout the process of caring for patients with AD, caregivers frequently experience social, emotional, physical, and financial losses, which become more significant as the disease progresses. Minimizing these losses is a goal in the overall management of AD. Successful treatment of the patient has been shown to positively impact quality of life for the caregiver. Randomized, controlled studies of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) have demonstrated the effectiveness of these agents in stabilizing cognitive function and delaying behavioral symptoms. Moreover, a decrease in the incidence of nursing home placement has been associated with this therapy. The growing burden of AD on families and society as a whole warrants the investigation of ways to minimize the impact of AD. AChEIs play an important role in this effort. Further studies are needed to more closely examine the impact of specific AChEIs on caregiver burden.

The effects of galantamine treatment on caregiver time in Alzheimer's disease

AIM

The aim of the study was to determine whether the clinical benefits of galantamine for patients with Alzheimer's disease lead to benefits for caregivers.

METHODS

Data were pooled from two concurrent, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month trials. Time caregivers spent assisting with activities of daily living (ADL) and time patients could be left unsupervised each day were assessed using the Allocation of Caregiver Time Survey. In total, 825 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease were included.

RESULTS

At endpoint, caregivers of galantamine-treated patients were more likely to report reductions (41% vs 37%), maintenance (19% vs 14%) or smaller increases (26% vs 34% reporting an increase >30 minutes) in time assisting with ADL compared with the placebo group (p=0.026; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The mean daily time difference was 32 minutes (p=0.011). Among patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease, caregivers of galantamine-treated patients were even more likely to report reductions (46% vs 37%), maintenance (15% vs 6%) or smaller increases (25% vs 42% for increases >30 min) vs placebo (p=0.004), with a mean daily time saving of 53 minutes (p=0.021). Caregivers of galantamine-treated patients were more likely to report increases (22% vs 18%), maintenance (45% vs 43%) or smaller reductions (30% vs 37% for reductions >30 minutes) in time the patient could be left unsupervised compared with placebo (p=0.027). Mean daily time saving was 27 minutes. Among patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease, the treatment effect was greater (p=0.029), with caregivers in the galantamine group reporting the change in time left unsupervised as 68 minutes longer each day than caregivers of patients receiving placebo.

CONCLUSION

The clinical benefits of galantamine for patients with Alzheimer's disease are also associated with benefits to caregiving.

A critique of research measures used to assess inappropriate psychoactive drug use in older adults

An overview and critique of research measures of inappropriate psychoactive drug use in the treatment of frail older adults is presented. These measures are compared on the basis of six key criteria for the complex determination of inappropriate psychoactive drug use as a research variable. These six instruments/standards are examined also for their advantages and disadvantages as research tools. Based on this review and related literature, recommendations are made that future studies of inappropriate psychoactive drug use include expert clinician assessment, measures of target symptoms and functional status, physiological indicators wherever possible, and drug and dosage classifications according to interdisciplinary consensus-based criteria.

Maintaining cognitive function in Alzheimer disease: how effective are current treatments?

Cognitive impairment, a core feature of Alzheimer disease (AD), is highly correlated with functional decline and caregiver time. Over 12 months, patients with mild-to-moderate AD deteriorate by 5-6 points from baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog). Stabilizing cognitive decline is, therefore, an important treatment outcome in AD. Cognitive deficits are thought to result in part from central cholinergic impairment, which provides the rationale for the enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission as a treatment approach for AD. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition has, to date, produced the most promising outcomes in clinical trials. Galantamine appears to be novel among marketed agents in that it inhibits AChE and modulates cholinergic nicotinic receptors, perhaps increasing neurotransmission via both mechanisms. Long-term effects of AChE inhibitors and galantamine on ADAS-cog scores of patients with mild-to-moderate AD have been studied in placebo controlled trials as well as open-extension studies that followed randomized, double-blind studies for up to 6 months. Conventional AChE inhibitors (rivastigmine and donepezil) have maintained ADAS-cog baseline scores for up to 40 weeks in open extension studies, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores for up to 52 weeks in a placebo-controlled study. The mean ADAS-cog score of galantamine-treated patients did not change from baseline at 12 months (6 months double-blind study followed by 6 months open-label extension), suggesting that cognitive function had been maintained. These results suggest that cholinergic treatments, including galantamine, may stabilize cognitive decline of AD patients. This outcome is likely to make an important difference to patients and caregivers.

Assessing outcomes in Alzheimer disease

To gain a better overview of the effectiveness of treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), areas such as cognition, activities of daily living (ADL), behavior, caregiver burden, quality of life and economics need to be assessed. A number of instruments are available for assessing these domains, many of which are reviewed in this article. These include the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (the standard instrument for the measurement of efficacy in dementia trials), scales that assess AD patients' abilities to perform ADL (including the Disability Assessment for Dementia scale and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living), scales to assess behavioral symptoms in dementia (including the Neuropsychiatric Inventory and the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale), scales for assessing global clinical change, and methods for assessing caregiver time, quality of life and health economics. Each instrument has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, the instruments used need to be selected carefully to provide credible and informative outcome data.

Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's disease: is there a need to redefine treatment success?

The traditional aim of Alzheimer's disease treatment in clinical trials has been to improve cognitive abilities. It has become increasingly clear, however, that other aspects are important in assessing treatment responses. A group of 10 physicians recently gathered to review the current criteria for assessing treatment success in Alzheimer's disease. While cognition has been previously viewed as the primary measure of efficacy, areas such as functional abilities, behaviour, caregiver burden, quality of life and resource utilization all need to be comprehensively assessed to fully evaluate treatment effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease, as well as their impacts on caregivers and society. Postponing or slowing decline in any of these areas may represent an important benefit and should be considered as an outcome measure in clinical trials, clinical practice and decision-making about healthcare budgets. Accepted instruments are available for assessing outcomes in each aspect of Alzheimer's disease, but they need to be selected carefully to provide valid, meaningful data. Some of the most frequently used outcome measures in Alzheimer's disease are reviewed. Using expanded criteria for treatment success and clinically relevant outcome measures, data from currently available studies show that cholinesterase inhibitors produce clinically meaningful long-term benefits in multiple domains in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Asia regional meeting of the International Working Group for the Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines: meeting report

This meeting successfully catalyzed the establishment of a new working alliance between clinical dementia researches in Asia and identified common goals for the group to attain. The progress toward achieving these goals will be examined at the next Asia regional meeting, which is being planned for October 2002 in Beijing, China. This new regional working group will work with the IWG to overcome the existing methodological and regulatory obstacles impeding dementia treatment trials in Asia.

Review of rivastigmine and its clinical applications in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders

Rivastigmine (Exelontrade mark, Novartis) is a novel intermediate-acting reversible and non-competitive carbamate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) that was recently introduced for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Preclinical studies have shown that rivastigmine has many similarities to other currently available cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and some important differences. The drug has been evaluated for this use in two well designed, published, adequately powered, Phase III, 26 week clinical trials that included a total of more than 1500 rivastigmine and 700 placebo recipients. Most of these patients had concomitant disorders that were being treated with numerous other drugs. These studies indicate that rivastigmine (6 - 12 mg/day) usually produces cognitive, global and functional changes that indicate significantly less deterioration than was observed with placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate AD, with higher doses producing more benefits. Rivastigmine is beneficial in all three domains (namely cognition, daily activities and behaviour) of AD. Data on long-term efficacy support continued benefits of rivastigmine beyond 6 months. Rivastigmine is generally well-tolerated with no requirement for routine electrocardiogram (ECG) or blood monitoring. Rivastigmine causes adverse events that are generally those expected from a ChEI and mainly involve gastrointestinal system. They are usually mild-to-moderate, of short duration and responsive to dosage reduction. They occur mostly during the dosage titration phase and decrease during the maintenance phase. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions are unlikely. The consistent efficacy in treating all three domains (cognition, daily functioning and behaviour) and good tolerability, particularly with slow titration, makes rivastigmine a good first-line ChEI therapy for the treatment of AD. Therapeutic dose range is 6 - 12 mg/day. Rivastigmine should be started at 1.5 mg b.i.d. with meals and increased at 2 - 4 week intervals to achieve the highest tolerated dose.

Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines (United States and Europe): a report of the International Working Group for the Harmonization for Dementia Drug Guidelines

The International Working Group for the Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines has been active for more than 5 years attempting to improve the efficiency of international drug development. A virtual organization was formed of clinicians, scientists, industries, participants, and regulators from various nations around the world. This article summarizes a variety of conferences and physicians' papers focusing on aspects of trials ranging from diagnosis, assessment, and trial design to pharmacoeconomics and ethics.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have been extensively tested in placebo-controlled studies for use as symptomatic drugs in mild-to-moderate stages of Alzheimer's disease. Published evidence has shown a modest increase in cognitive performance and a stabilisation of functional decline, more evident at higher doses of the respective drugs. It is still unclear as to whether there is a delay in emergence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and in need for nursing home placement. The clinical efficacy of this class of drug will likely be enhanced by combination with other drugs, as well as through non-pharmacologic interventions. Novel trial designs will be required to establish the safety and efficacy of such combinations.