Spiraling out of control: one case of pathologic anxiety as a response to a genetic risk of cancer

Experiences With Genetic Counseling, Testing, and Diagnosis Among Adolescents With a Genetic Condition: A Scoping Review

IMPORTANCE

The number of adolescents who are diagnosed with a genetic disorder is increasing as genome sequencing becomes the standard of clinical diagnostic testing. However, the experience of receiving a diagnosis of a genetic condition has not been extensively studied in adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To identify how adolescents with a genetic condition engage with genetic or genomic counseling services as well as interpret, adapt to, and experience their diagnosis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO was undertaken. Articles (primary literature, knowledge syntheses, and gray literature) in English that investigated the experiences of adolescents between 10 and 19 years of age who received genetic or genomic counseling were included. Data were extracted from 45 eligible articles and analyzed descriptively.

FINDINGS

A total of 45 studies were included, most of which were quantitative in nature (21 of 45 [47%]) and conducted in the US (n = 13), followed by the UK (n = 8), Australia (n = 8), and Canada (n = 6). A total of 29 distinct monogenic disorders were investigated. Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 930, with a median of 23 participants, and the year of publication ranged from 1977 to 2019. Included studies addressed all aspects of genetic counseling, but a preponderance of articles assessed knowledge about genetic conditions (n = 17) and challenges of communication within families (n = 16). Fewer articles addressed the experiences of adolescents adapting to their genetic conditions (n = 8) and the genetic counseling process (n = 4). Only 1 study addressed any aspect of genetic counseling in relation to genome sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This scoping review found that most of the included studies focused on adolescents' knowledge about their genetic condition and communication about genetic risks, whereas fewer studies explored their adaptation to the condition and the genetic counseling process. A systematic reconsideration of the genetic counseling process may be undertaken to provide an evidence-informed health care service that is tailored to the needs of this adolescent population.

Genetic counseling does not fulfill the counselees' need for certainty in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families: an explorative assessment

BACKGROUND

Many cancer-patients undergo DNA testing in the BRCA1/2 genes to receive information about the likelihood that cancer is heritable. Previous nonsystematic studies suggested that DNA testing often does not fulfill the counselees' needs for certainty. We explored the balance between the counselees' need for certainty and perceived certainty (NfC-PC, i.e., level of fulfillment of NfC) regarding the specific domains of DNA test result, heredity and cancer. We also examined relationships of NfC-PC with coping styles and distress.

METHOD

Before disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (T1), questionnaires were filled in by 467 cancer-patients. Another questionnaire (T2) was filled in after disclosure of pathogenic mutation results (n = 30), uninformative results (n = 202) or unclassified-variants (n = 16).

RESULTS

Before and after DNA test result disclosure, overall 58-94% of all counselees experienced unfulfilled NfC regarding the DNA test result, heredity and cancer. Compared with T1, the communication of pathogenic mutations (T2) caused more fulfillment of the NfC about the DNA test result, but less about cancer and heredity (p < .01). Compared with T1, unclassified variants (T2) did not significantly change the extent of fulfillment of all counselees' needs for certainty (NfC > PC). Compared with T1, uninformative results (T2) caused more fulfillments of all needs than before disclosure (p < 0.01). Counselees differentiated NfC and PC between the domains of DNA-test result, heredity and cancer (p < 0.01). The unfulfilled needs for certainty (NfC-PC) were uncorrelated with cognitive understanding of the DNA test result.

CONCLUSION

The counselees' NfC needs more attention in research and practice, for example, when the potential uncertainties of testing are discussed. The counselees' NfC may be assessed and used in tailored, mutual communication of DNA test results.

A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: explaining the inaccuracy of the counselees' risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure

PURPOSE

Genetic counseling may help counselees understand their genetic risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. However, many studies have shown that their perception of their risks is inaccurate. Information-oriented variables often predicted the level of accuracy, focusing on specific processes of receiving and processing risks. We examined counselee-oriented predictors about how counselees embed cancer risks in their lives. These predictors reflect the personal meaning of genetic risks and are expected to explain/mediate the impact of genetic counseling on risk-perception-accuracy.

METHOD

We analyzed 248 questionnaires of a prospective study, filled in by probands with breast/ovarian cancer and pathogenic mutations, unclassified variants, or uninformative results (n = 30, 16, and 202, respectively). Mediation regression analyses were performed to examine whether counselee predictors mediated/explained the influence of information predictors on the accuracy. Information-oriented predictors regarded presentation format, communicated information, question format, education, pedigree information, cancer experience, and cognitive processes/heuristics. Counselee-oriented predictors regarded their self/personality, life/existence, and need for certainty about DNA test result, heredity, and cancer.

RESULTS

Both information-oriented and counselee-oriented variables significantly predicted the accuracy of the counselees' risk perception, with moderate to large effect sizes. Counselee-oriented variables completely mediated/explained the effects of information-oriented variables on the accuracy.

DISCUSSION

Counselees seemed to transform objective cancer risks into personally relevant information. Only through this personal meaning of genetic information, information-oriented processes seemed to cause inaccurate perceptions. Genetic counselors are suggested to focus communication on these personal processes.

Bringing threat to the fore: participating in lifelong surveillance for genetic risk of cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To explain how patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a (MEN2a) and family members conceptualize participation in lifelong surveillance in genetic cancer care.

DESIGN

Qualitative naturalistic inquiry.

SETTING

Northeastern United States. Data were collected during interviews in informants' homes.

SAMPLE

12 adult patients and 9 family members were recruited purposively through endocrinology clinics at two East Coast medical centers.

METHODS

A grounded theory design was used. Subjects completed a demographic questionnaire and were interviewed on two occasions. In-depth interviews were audiotaped. The core concept and process variables emerged through three levels of narrative content analysis, theoretical sampling, and constant comparison. The generated theory was presented to the participants for validation.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

The basic psychological issue associated with participation in lifelong surveillance and the psychosocial processes used by individuals to deal with the issues.

FINDINGS

MEN2a patients and family members experience surveillance as a (Re)Minding of a threat to health. Once threat is brought to the fore, participants interpret the meaning and negotiate control of the impact of the diagnosis, related events, and consequences. Meaningful information from surveillance activities is incorporated into participants' self-image and daily lives through a process of (Re)Integration. The genetic nature of MEN2a did not emerge as a significant subcategory in relation to the core variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Finding meaning in the outcomes of surveillance events is a psychosocial process that is central to participation in lifelong surveillance. Genetic predisposition to cancer was a peripheral concern to subjects as they dealt with surveillance issues.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

This investigation provides a model for the development of a grounded theory for understanding how people with other genetic cancer syndromes participate in lifelong surveillance.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a (MEN2a): a call for psycho-social research

This paper summarizes what is known about the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-care of people with the inherited disorder multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a (MEN2a). Several databases were searched throughout the year 2000, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, CancerLit, PsychINFO, and Dissertation Abstracts International. MEN2a is a complex disease involving cancer care and control by surgery, health maintenance, and life-long observation of gene mutation carriers. Genetic testing is the standard of care, prophylactic surgery is recommended during directive counseling, and life-long surveillance is encouraged for people with MEN2a. A substantial body of scientific literature describes morbidity and mortality outcomes of disease treatment, and the monitoring of multiple organ systems. Research is scant concerning the psychological consequences and social impact of the MEN2a diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Nearly all that is known from a psycho-social perspective comes from data in The Netherlands. Little is known of the psychological responses to and social consequences of genetic predisposition testing, prophylactic and curative surgery, and life-long surveillance. Psycho-social research is essential to provide comprehensive care for patients and family members with this disorder and it is necessary to guide the development of risk management strategies for patients with this inherited cancer syndrome. Since MEN2a has been labeled a prototype for medical genetics, information on MEN2a patient experiences may be relevant to the care of individuals with other inherited cancer syndromes.