Pergolide therapy in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatment to levodopa therapy in Parkinson s disease patients with motor complications

BACKGROUND

One of the complications of long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with levodopa is the development of motor complications. Generally, when motor complications develop, clinicians add in an additional drug (to the levodopa regimen) from one of three other classes of anti-Parkinsonian treatments (dopamine agonists, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMTIs) or monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAOBIs)). However, despite trials having shown that these drugs are beneficial compared to placebo, it remains unclear as to the best way to treat patients experiencing motor complications and whether one class of drug is more effective than another.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to assess more reliably the benefits and risks of the three classes of drugs (dopamine agonists, COMTIs and MAOBIs) currently used as adjuvant treatment to levodopa in PD patients suffering from motor complications. The three drug classes were compared with the aim of determining whether one class of drug provides better symptomatic control than another.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS and Web of Science, plus major journals in the field, abstract books, conference proceedings and reference lists of retrieved publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing an orally administered dopamine agonist, COMTI or MAOBI versus placebo, both on a background of levodopa therapy, in PD patients experiencing motor complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data on off-time, levodopa dose, motor complications, side-effects, treatment concordance, clinician-rated disability, mortality, quality of life and health economic data.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four eligible trials, involving 8436 participants were identified. Compared to placebo, adjuvant therapy significantly reduced off-time (-1.05 hours/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.19 to -0.90; P<0.00001), the required levodopa dose (-55.65 mg/day, CI -62.67 to -48.62; P<0.00001) and improved UPDRS scores (UPDRS ADL score: -1.31 points, CI -1.62 to -0.99; P<0.00001; UPDRS motor score: -2.84 points, CI -3.36 to -2.32; P<0.00001; UPDRS total score: -3.26 points, CI -4.52 to -2.00; P<0.00001). However, dyskinesia (odds ratio (OR) 2.50, CI 2.21 to 2.84; P<0.00001) and side-effects including constipation (OR 3.19, CI 2.17 to 4.68; P<0.00001), dizziness (OR 1.57, CI 1.30 to 1.90; P<0.00001), dry mouth (OR 2.33, CI 1.22 to 4.47; P=0.01), hallucinations (OR 2.16, CI 1.70 to 2.74; P<0.00001), hypotension (OR 1.47, CI 1.18 to 1.83; P=0.0007), insomnia (OR 1.38, CI 1.09 to 1.74; P=0.007), nausea (OR 1.78, CI 1.53 to 2.07; P<0.00001), somnolence (OR 1.87, CI 1.40 to 2.51; P<0.0001) and vomiting (OR 2.56, CI 1.67 to 3.93; P<0.0001) were all increased with adjuvant therapy.Indirect comparisons of the three drug classes suggested that dopamine agonists were more efficacious in reducing off-time (dopamine agonist: -1.54 hours/day; COMTI: -0.83 hours/day; MAOBI: -0.93 hours/day; test for heterogeneity between drug classes P=0.0003) and levodopa dose (dopamine agonist: -116 mg/day; COMTI: -52 mg/day; MAOBI: -29 mg/day; test for heterogeneity between drug classes P<0.00001). UPDRS scores also improved more with dopamine agonists than with COMTI or MAOBI (UPDRS total scores - dopamine agonist: -10.01 points versus COMTI: -1.46 points versus MAOBI: -2.20 points; test for heterogeneity between drug classes P<0.00001), although more dyskinesia were seen with dopamine agonists (OR 2.70) and COMTI (OR 2.50) than with MAOBI (OR 0.94) (test for heterogeneity between drug classes P=0.009). Although the increase in the overall incidence of side-effects was generally more marked with dopamine agonists (OR 1.52) and COMTI (OR 2.0) than with MAOBI (OR 1.32), heterogeneity between drug classes was only of borderline significance (P=0.07).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to placebo, adjuvant therapy reduces off-time, levodopa dose, and improves UPDRS scores in PD patients who develop motor complications on levodopa therapy. However, this is at the expense of increased dyskinesia and numerous other side-effects. Indirect comparisons suggest that dopamine agonist therapy may be more effective than COMTI and MAOBI therapy, which have comparable efficacy. However, as indirect comparisons should be interpreted with caution, direct head-to-head randomised trials assessing the impact of these different drug classes on overall patient-rated quality of life are needed.

Dopamine Agonist Pergolide Prevents Levodopa-Induced Quinoprotein Formation in Parkinsonian Striatum and Shows Quenching Effects on Dopamine-Semiquinone Generated in Vitro

The neurotoxicity of dopamine (DA) quinones that appears in dopaminergic neuron-specific oxidative stress has recently been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis and/or progression of Parkinson disease. To clarify the effects of a DA agonist, pergolide, on the levodopa-induced elevation of quinones, the authors examined striatal changes in quinoprotein using a hemi-parkinsonian mouse model. The level of striatal quinoprotein was significantly elevated specifically on the parkinsonian side, but not on the control side, after repeated levodopa administration. This levodopa-induced increase in striatal quinoprotein was almost completely suppressed by adjunctive administration with pergolide on the lesioned side. Furthermore, it was clarified that pergolide scavenged DA-semiquinones generated in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. These suppressive and quenching effects of pergolide against cytotoxic DA quinones may play a key role in its neuroprotective mechanism in the parkinsonian brain.

Appropriate dosing of pergolide in monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in Parkinsonʼs disease

Pergolide is one of the most well-tested and widely used dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinson's disease; however, there is worrying evidence that sub-therapeutic dosing of pergolide is widespread in clinical practice. Clinical studies in Caucasians suggest that a pergolide dose of 3 mg/day provides the optimal efficacy to tolerability ratio and that, in Japanese patients, a dose in excess of 2.25 mg/day may be ideal. Whether pergolide is used early in patients with de-novo Parkinson's disease or as adjunctive therapy later in the disease, in order to optimize its clinical efficacy, it is recommended that practitioners aim to achieve at least these doses, or higher ones, if the drug is well tolerated.

Potential of transdermal drug delivery in Parkinson's disease

There has been a growing recognition that pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors may be an important mechanism in the generation of the motor fluctuations that often develop and compromise the effectiveness of long-term levodopa administration in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD). This has prompted investigation of treatment approaches that might provide more constant, and therefore physiological, dopamine receptor stimulation. Frequent levodopa administration, controlled-release levodopa preparations, inhibitors of levodopa metabolism, and duodenal, subcutaneous and even intravenous infusions of levodopa or dopamine agonists have all been employed with this goal in mind, but all have limitations. Transdermal drug delivery is a treatment approach that is not only capable of providing a constant rate of drug delivery, but is also non-invasive and relatively simple to use. However, developing a drug to be delivered transdermally for the treatment of PD has been anything but easy. Levodopa and many dopamine agonists are not sufficiently soluble to be administered via the transdermal route, and blind alleys have been encountered thus far in the investigation of suitably soluble drugs. Nevertheless, investigation continues and yet another candidate drug, rotigotine (N-0923), is currently under active investigation. Techniques designed to enhance skin permeation and thus improve the effectiveness of transdermal drug delivery are also potential sources for future treatment advances.

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.

Pergolide for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of adjunct pergolide therapy versus placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease suffering from the complications of levodopa therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Handsearching of the neurology literature as part of the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group's strategy. Examination of the reference lists of identified studies and other reviews. Contact with Eli Lilly and Company Limited.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of pergolide versus placebo in patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and long-term complications of levodopa therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was abstracted independently by each author and differences settled by discussion. The outcome measures used included Parkinson's disease rating scales, levodopa dosage, 'off' time measurements and the frequency of drop outs and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

A large number of small RCTs were identified, but these were part of a large multicentre trial which was eventually published in full. The final publication was used as the only subject for this review. The time patients spent 'off' was reduced by 1.8 hours with pergolide compared with 0.2 hours with placebo (p < 0.001). Dyskinesia developed or deteriorated in 62% of pergolide-treated compared with 25% placebo-treated patients (p < 0. 05). The excess in dyskinesia prevalence and severity resolved by the end of the study with levodopa reduction. Levodopa dose was reduced more in those receiving pergolide (235 mg v 51 mg; p < 0. 001). Pergolide produced significant improvement in Hoehn and Yahr stage (p < 0.05) and both the motor and activities of daily living parts of a modified Columbia rating scale (both p < 0.001). Significantly more patients suffered nausea (24% v 13%; p < 0.001) and hallucinations (14% v 3%; p < 0.01) on pergolide. No difference was found in the numbers remaining on treatment at the end of the study (pergolide 84% v placebo 82%) but withdrawals due to adverse events were greater in those taking pergolide (10% v 4%).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Based on this single large multicentre study, pergolide reduces 'off' time and improves impairment and disability due to Parkinson's disease whilst allowing a reduction in levodopa dose. This is at the expense of dopaminergic adverse events. Further trials are required to compare pergolide with the newer dopamine agonists.

Dopamine agonists

Dopamine agonists have been used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) since the mid 1970s. With the approval of two new agents in 1997, the number available in the United States is up to four; bromocriptine, pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole. These agents differ in dopamine receptor affinities and chemical structure, which, in turn, may possibly result in differences in efficacy tolerability and safety. Dopamine have historically been used in combination with levodopa in patients with advanced PD, but indicators are now expanding. With is expansion comes increasing controversy. This article reviews dopamine receptor pharmacology and the results of the clinical trials that have used for agonists available in the United States as well as a discussion of three minor agonists.

Pergolide compared with bromocriptine in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, crossover, controlled study

We compared the efficacy and safety of pergolide and bromocriptine in 57 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with a declining response to levodopa therapy in a single-blind, crossover study. Patients were placed randomly on the sequence bromocriptine-pergolide (12 + 12 weeks) or vice versa. Regular evaluations using the New York University Parkinson's Disease Scale were performed by a clinician blinded to treatment assignment. Patients' and clinicians' impressions also were recorded. The average daily dose of pergolide was 2.3 +/0- 0.8 mg, and that of bromocriptine was 24.2 +/- 8.4 mg. Significantly greater efficacy was demonstrated by both drugs as adjunctive therapy to levodopa compared with previous treatment of levodopa alone (pergolide, p = 0.0001; bromocriptine, p = 0.0005; Wilcoxon t test). Pergolide was more effective than bromocriptine in daily living scores (p = 0.020) and motor scores (p = 0.038). No difference in dyskinesias, dystonias, and psychosis was observed. Adverse events were more frequent in bromocriptine-treated patients. Most patients and physicians preferred pergolide to bromocriptine. Pergolide as adjunctive therapy to levodopa was more effective than bromocriptine in this short-term trial.

A multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pergolide as an adjunct to Sinemet in Parkinson's disease

Three hundred and seventy-six subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease participated in a prospective, double-blind placebo-controlled study of the dopamine agonist pergolide mesylate as an adjunct to Sinemet. At 6 months, patients randomized to pergolide had a statistically significant improvement in total Parkinson's score, scores of activities of daily living, motor function, number of "off" hours, Hoehn and Yahr stage, and numerous parameters of parkinsonian function including bradykinesia, rigidity, gait, and dexterity. This benefit was obtained with the addition of a mean dose of 2.94 mg of pergolide, which permitted a 24.7% reduction in dose of levodopa. Adverse reactions were, for the most part, mild, reversible, and not of major clinical significance. No significant cardiac or electrocardiographic abnormalities were detected. This study demonstrates that pergolide mesylate, as an adjunct to levodopa, is an effective antiparkinsonian agent that provides clinical improvement while permitting a reduction in levodopa dose.

Update on dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease: "beyond bromocriptine"

Since the initiation of bromocriptine therapy for Parkinson's disease several newer dopamine agonists have been developed. Pergolide has reached the stage of Phase 3 clinical trials and will probably be available for general use sometime in the foreseeable future. Lisuride shows most promise in its parenteral form for infusion therapy of patients with severe fluctuations. Mesulergine, another ergot-derivative and ciladopa, a new non-ergot agonist, have been withdrawn from further clinical use due to tumorogenesis in rats. It is questionable how applicable these findings are to the use of the drugs in elderly humans with parkinsonism. Recently a small number of drugs have been found to have postsynaptic dopamine agonist properties only in the setting of denervated supersensitive dopamine receptors. These agents may be particularly effective in the early treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease. This paper will review a number of the dopamine agonists which have been developed since the introduction of bromocriptine therapy. Several of these have shown beneficial effects in early clinical trials while others show promise in preclinical studies of animal models of parkinsonism.