1
|
García-Cortés M, Ortega-Alonso A, Andrade RJ. Safety of treating acute liver injury and failure. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 21:191-203. [PMID: 34254839 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1955854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute liver injury and progression to acute liver failure can be life-threatening conditions that require prompt careful clinical assessment and therapeutic management. AREAS COVERED The aim of this article is to review the safety and side effect profile of pharmacological therapies used in the treatment of acute liver injury with specific focus on hepatic toxicity. We performed an extensive literature search with the terms 'acute liver injury,' 'acute liver failure,' 'therapy,' 'safety,' 'adverse reactions' and 'drug induced liver injury.' A thorough discussion of the main drugs and devices used in patients with acute liver injury and acute liver failure, its safety profile and the management of complications associated to therapy of these conditions is presented. EXPERT OPINION Several pharmacological approaches are used in acute liver injury and acute liver failure in an empirical basis. Whilst steroids are frequently tried in serious drug-induced liver injury there is concern on a potential harmful effect of these agents because of the higher mortality in patients receiving the drug; hence, statistical approaches such as propensity score matching might help resolve this clinical dilemma. Likewise, properly designed clinical trials using old and new drugs for subjects with serious drug-induced liver injury are clearly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miren García-Cortés
- Servicio De Aparato Digestivo, Instituto De Investigación Biomédica De Málaga-IBIMA. Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Victoria, Universidad De Málaga, Centro De Investigación Biomédica En Red De Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas CIBERehd, Málaga, Spain
| | - Aida Ortega-Alonso
- Servicio De Aparato Digestivo, Instituto De Investigación Biomédica De Málaga-IBIMA. Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Victoria, Universidad De Málaga, Centro De Investigación Biomédica En Red De Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas CIBERehd, Málaga, Spain
| | - Raúl J Andrade
- Servicio De Aparato Digestivo, Instituto De Investigación Biomédica De Málaga-IBIMA. Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Victoria, Universidad De Málaga, Centro De Investigación Biomédica En Red De Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas CIBERehd, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salah N, Daniel I, Meyer-Krahmer HJ, Thölking G. Eosinophilic pneumonia induced by gabapentin. Scand J Rheumatol 2020; 50:246-247. [PMID: 32803998 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2020.1784462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Salah
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital of Münster Marienhospital Steinfurt, Steinfurt, Germany
| | - I Daniel
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital of Münster Marienhospital Steinfurt, Steinfurt, Germany
| | - H J Meyer-Krahmer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Münster Marienhospital Steinfurt, Steinfurt, Germany
| | - G Thölking
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital of Münster Marienhospital Steinfurt, Steinfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eldahan KC, Williams HC, Cox DH, Gollihue JL, Patel SP, Rabchevsky AG. Paradoxical effects of continuous high dose gabapentin treatment on autonomic dysreflexia after complete spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2020; 323:113083. [DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
4
|
Newman AJ, Mullens D, Pulford C, Lam T. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma secondary to gabapentin. BMJ Case Rep 2018; 2018:bcr-2018-227245. [PMID: 30344158 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Newman
- Dermatology Residency, Affiliated Dermatology, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Dustin Mullens
- Dermatology Residency, Affiliated Dermatology, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Travis Lam
- Affiliated Dermatology, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moavero R, Pisani LR, Pisani F, Curatolo P. Safety and tolerability profile of new antiepileptic drug treatment in children with epilepsy. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:1015-1028. [PMID: 30169997 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1518427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of pediatric epilepsy requires a careful evaluation of the safety and tolerability profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to avoid or minimize as much as possible adverse events (AEs) on various organs, hematological parameters, and growth, pubertal, motor, cognitive and behavioral development. AREAS COVERED Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) reported in the literature 2000-2018 regarding second- and third-generation AEDs used in the pediatric age, with exclusion of the neonatal period that exhibits specific peculiarities, have been described on the basis of their frequency, severity/tolerability, and particular association with a given AED. EXPERT OPINION Somnolence/sedation and behavioral changes, like irritability and nervousness, are among the most commonly observed TEAEs associated with almost all AEDs. Lamotrigine, Gabapentin, Oxcarbazepine, and Levetiracetam appear to be the best-tolerated AEDs with a ≤2% withdrawal rate, while Tiagabine and Everolimus are discontinued in up to >20% of the patients because of intolerable TEAEs. For some AEDs, literature data are scanty to draw a high-level evidence on their safety and tolerability profile. The reasons are: insufficient population size, short duration of treatments, or lack of controlled trials. A future goal is that of identifying clearer, easier, and more homogeneous methodological strategies to facilitate AED testing in pediatric populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romina Moavero
- a Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department , Tor Vergata University of Rome , Rome , Italy.,b Child Neurology Unit, Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation Department , "Bambino Gesù", Children's Hospital, IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | | | - Francesco Pisani
- d Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Messina , Messina , Italy
| | - Paolo Curatolo
- a Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, Systems Medicine Department , Tor Vergata University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vidaurre J, Gedela S, Yarosz S. Antiepileptic Drugs and Liver Disease. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 77:23-36. [PMID: 29097018 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Acute, symptomatic seizures or epilepsy may complicate the course of hepatic disease. Choosing the most appropriate antiepileptic drug in this setting represents a difficult challenge, as most medications are metabolized by the liver. This article focuses on the acute and chronic treatment of seizures in patients with advanced liver disease and reviews the hepatotoxic potential of specific antiepileptic drugs. Newer antiepileptic drugs without, or with minimal, hepatic metabolism, such as levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate, gabapentin, and pregabalin should be used as first-line therapy. Medications undergoing extensive hepatic metabolism, such as valproic acid, phenytoin, and felbamate should be used as drugs of last resort. In special circumstances, as in patients affected by acute intermittent porphyria, exposure to most antiepileptic drugs could precipitate attacks. In this clinical scenario, bromides, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and vigabatrin constitute safe choices. For the treatment of status epilepticus, levetiracetam and lacosamide, available in intravenous preparations, are good second-line therapies after benzodiazepines fail to control seizures. Hepatotoxicity is also a rare and unexpected side effect of some antiepileptic drugs. Drugs such as valproic acid, phenytoin, and felbamate, have a well-recognized association with liver toxicity. Other antiepileptic drugs, including phenobarbital, benzodiazepines, ethosuximide, and the newer generations of antiepileptic drugs, have only rarely been linked to hepatotoxicity. Thus physicians should be mindful of the pharmacokinetic profile and the hepatotoxic potential of the different antiepileptic drugs available to treat patients affected by liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Vidaurre
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Satyanarayana Gedela
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Shannon Yarosz
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is one of the most common reasons for an approved drug being restricted. This article focuses on hepatotoxicity of selected and recently introduced agents, such as, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, novel oral anticoagulants, newer antiplatelets, antibiotics, anti-diabetics, anti-epileptics, anti-depressants, anti-psychotics and anti-retrovirals. Overall, the incidence of clinically relevant hepatotoxicity from newer agents seems to be lower than that of the older agents. Nevertheless, cases of severe hepatotoxicity have been reported due to some of these newer agents, including, trastuzumab, ipilimumab, infliximab, imatinib, bosutinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, ponatinib, lapatinib, vemurafenib, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, felbamate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, venlafaxine, duloxetine, darunavir, and maraviroc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 2 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, HUP, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Rajavithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - K Rajender Reddy
- Liver Transplantation, Viral Hepatitis Center, University of Pennsylvania, 2 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, HUP, Liver Transplant Office, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Abstract
Life-threatening and benign drug reactions occur frequently in the skin, affecting 8 % of the general population and 2-3 % of all hospitalized patients, emphasizing the need for physicians to effectively recognize and manage patients with drug-induced eruptions. Neurologic medications represent a vast array of drug classes with cutaneous side effects. Approximately 7 % of the United States (US) adult population is affected by adult-onset neurological disorders, reflecting a large number of patients on neurologic drug therapies. This review elucidates the cutaneous reactions associated with medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat the following neurologic pathologies: Alzheimer disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington disease, migraine, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and pseudobulbar affect. A search of the literature was performed using the specific FDA-approved drug or drug classes in combination with the terms 'dermatologic,' 'cutaneous,' 'skin,' or 'rash.' Both PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were utilized, with side effects ranging from those cited in randomized controlled trials to case reports. It behooves neurologists, dermatologists, and primary care physicians to be aware of the recorded cutaneous adverse reactions and their severity for proper management and potential need to withdraw the offending medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sylvia Hsu
- Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph S Kass
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., 9th Floor, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goldman J, Duval-Modeste AB, Musette P, Joly P, Massy N, Courville C, Rabehenoina A. [Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome due to gabapentin]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2008; 135:230-2. [PMID: 18374860 DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2007.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2007] [Accepted: 11/09/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
Older generation antiepileptic drugs like Phenobarbital (Luminal), carbamazepine (Tegretol), phenytoin (Dilantin), and valproic acid (Depakote) have several shortcomings such as suboptimal response rates, significant adverse effects, several drug interactions, and a narrow therapeutic index. New antiepileptic drugs have been developed in the last decade to overcome some of these problems. These newer generation antiepileptics like felbamate (Felbatol), gabapentin (Neurontin), lamotrigine (Lamictal), levetiracetam (Keppra), oxcarbazepine (Trileptal), tiagabine (Gabitril), topiramate (Topamax), and zonisamide (Zonegran) have better tolerability profiles, low interaction potential, and significantly less enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties. As the use of antiepileptic drugs has expanded to include treatment of neuropathic pain, newer side effects have been reported. In addition to the common side effects of antiepileptic drugs, like dizziness, drowsiness, and mental slowing; other side effects like weight gain, metabolic acidosis, nephrolithiasis, angle closure glaucoma, skin rash, hepatotoxicity, colitis, and movement and behavioral disorders, to name a few, have been brought to our attention. This review is an attempt to highlight the features and incidences of some of these side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kulbir S Walia
- Comprehensive Pain Centers, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gabapentin was first approved by the FDA in 1993 as an add-on treatment for partial epileptic seizures. In May of 2002, it was approved as treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia by the Food and Drug Administration. It appears to be a promising agent in the treatment of pain, alterations of sensation and pruritus associated with dermatological disease, but no review of these uses exists. METHODS Medline and Google searches were performed for the words "Gabapentin" and "Neurontin." The articles found were reviewed. Article identified that contained references to the treatment of skin disease and neuropathic pain were examined and their contents surveyed. RESULTS Approximately 1200 articles were located in Medline that referred to Garbapentin or Neurontin. Over 150 articles reviewed its use for neuropathic pain, neuritis or neuralgia of various sorts. Approximately 20 articles reviewed its use for a variety of dermatological conditions or diseases with dermatological manifestations that included: pain control associated with wound dressing changes, erythromelagia, piloleiomyoma related pain, brachioradial pruritus, Glossodynia, vulvodynia, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Over 100 articles that related to Gabapentin side effects were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Gabapentin is a very promising medication in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia and pain. Because dermatological patients suffer pain from painful tumors, after surgery, in conjunction with neuropathic ulcers, during dressing changes involving serious medical conditions, its applications seem manifold. Future studies must assess its role in the treatment of pruritus and other dermatological conditions involving pain or alteration of sensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Scheinfeld
- Department of Dermatology, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY 10025, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|