A crossover study comparing the kinetics of Tc-99m-labeled diethyl- and diisopropyl-IDA

Evaluation of six new 99mTc-IDA agents for hepatobiliary imaging

IDA derivatives of three substituted benzothiazol, and two substituted chlorophenyl and one substituted pyrazoline compounds have been labeled with 99mTc and screened with four rat models with hepatocellular dysfunction manifesting varying degrees of change of liver architecture and hepatocellular damage associated with an active parenchymal destruction, fatty metamorphosis and cirrhosis. Organ distribution studies at 1 h postinjection have been compared in normal and diseased animal models for each agent labeled with 99mTc and with 99mTc-Disofenin (Disida) and Lidofenin (Hida) and 131I-Rose Bengal. From the data obtained with the six new IDA derivatives, the distribution kinetics of 99mTc-Arclophenin, (N-N'-2-benzoyl-4-chlorophenyl)carbamoylmethyl) imino diacetic acid (Phenida), are closely comparable to 99mTc-Disofenin in all animal models. Crossover patient studies (n = 14) for clinical evaluation of 99mTc-Arclophenin vs 99mTc-Disofenin indicate the close similarity of the 2 agents with regard to blood pool retention, gross liver/heart ratios and liver washout, suggesting Arclofenin as a suitable agent for hepatobiliary function studies. The impaired hepatocellular animal models presented should serve for fast screening of hepatobiliary agents and enable comparison of a series of closely related compounds.

Radionuclide evaluation of liver transplants

Orthotopic liver transplantation is now an established technique for treating patients with various forms of end stage liver disease. The number of centers performing the procedure is increasing and, as the number of transplant recipients in the population increases, many institutions performing nuclear medicine studies will be confronted with requests to evaluate these patients. While a variety of radionuclides are proving useful in this evaluation, the 99mTc iminodiacetic acid (IDA) compounds, particularly 99mTc diisopropyl IDA (DISIDA), will probably account for the majority of radionuclide evaluations of these patients because they are well suited to monitor both structural and functional changes of the graft. The primary application of radionuclide studies is focused in the postoperative period, when problems with the vascular and biliary anastomoses, rejection, infections, and bile leaks all produce alterations in radionuclide hepatobiliary studies. Abnormalities such as rejection and infection produce primarily functional, rather than structural changes and are not easily differentiated based upon the kinetics of 99mTc-DISIDA extraction and excretion by the liver, serial imaging and correlation with clinical data is necessary in such situations. Quantitative analyses of kinetic 99mTc IDA (DISIDA) studies and quantitative approaches with other compounds such as 99mTc galactosyl-neoglycoalbumin (NGA) may permit better assessments of relatively subtle changes in liver function in the posttransplant period.

Diagnostic utility of hepatobiliary scintigraphy with 99mTc-DISIDA in neonatal cholestasis

We retrospectively evaluated the utility of hepatobiliary scintigraphy and various clinical factors in differentiating intrahepatic cholestasis from biliary atresia in 28 consecutive infants with neonatal cholestasis. One millicurie of technetium-labeled diisopropyliminodiacetic acid (DISIDA) was administered intravenously, and images were obtained for up to 24 hours or until gastrointestinal excretion was noted. Nine separate studies in seven infants with biliary atresia were correctly interpreted as showing no gastrointestinal excretion of radionuclide. Of the 21 patients with intrahepatic cholestasis, only nine had gastrointestinal excretion on the first study; in eight without excretion, a second study was done, and five of these showed gut excretion. All infants with either neonatal hepatitis (six) or inspissated bile syndrome (three) had demonstrable gastrointestinal excretion either on the first or second DISIDA study. However, five of six infants with paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts, two of six infants with cholestasis secondary to total parenteral nutrition, and one infant with cholangiolitis did not show evidence of gastrointestinal excretion. The mean birth weight, mean gestational age, and mean weight at study were significantly greater (P less than 0.005) for infants with biliary atresia without excretion than for infants with intrahepatic cholestasis without excretion. The mean direct bilirubin concentration was 6.0 mg/dL for both infants with biliary atresia and infants with intrahepatic cholestasis without excretion; however, infants with excretion had a significantly lower (P less than 0.02) mean direct bilirubin value of 3.4 mg/dL. Excretion was noted in four infants with total bilirubin values greater than 10.0 mg/dL. The absence of gut excretion on the first DISIDA study was 100% sensitive but only 43% specific for biliary atresia. In infants without gut excretion of DISIDA, birth weight greater than 2200 g was 100% sensitive and 92% specific for biliary atresia. We conclude that DISIDA scanning, together with clinical data, is useful in differentiating extrahepatic from intrahepatic cholestasis. The absence of gut excretion on the first DISIDA study does not necessarily indicate extrahepatic obstruction; the study should be repeated if the diagnosis is not clear.