• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4643627)   Today's Articles (133)   Subscriber (50576)
For: Beckett VA, Regan L. Vaginal birth after cesarean: the European experience. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001;44:594-603. [PMID: 11685883 DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200109000-00016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Comptour A, Delabaere A, Huret C, Ouziel L, Ughetto S, Pereira B, Gallot D. Success to reach 3cm of dilation with a Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert in primiparous women with a previous cesarean section versus nulliparous: A retrospective case-control study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022;51:102441. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
2
Bouchghoul H, Zeino S, Houllier M, Senat MV. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020;49:101699. [PMID: 32018044 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
3
Knight HE, Gurol-Urganci I, van der Meulen JH, Mahmood TA, Richmond DH, Dougall A, Cromwell DA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG 2013;121:183-92. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
4
Al-Shaikh G, Al-Mandeel H. The outcomes of trial of labour after cesarean section following induction of labour compared to spontaneous labour. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:1099-103. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2709-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2012] [Accepted: 01/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
5
Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, Halliday J, King JF, Gee V, O’Neill M, Snell M, Cull V, Cornes S. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG 2010;117:1358-65. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
6
Biswas A. Management of previous cesarean section. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:123-9. [PMID: 12634604 DOI: 10.1097/00001703-200304000-00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA