Shoulder instability in athletes. The Asian perspective

Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope

BACKGROUND

Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer.

METHODS

The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test.

RESULTS

Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°.

CONCLUSION

In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.

The laser-pointer assisted angle reproduction test for evaluation of proprioceptive shoulder function in patients with instability

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decade, proprioceptive function gained increasing attention in joint disorders such as instability of the shoulder. Common tests for evaluation of proprioception are limited by their complexity and high technical demands. Thus, they are hardly applicable during daily routine. Our hypothesis was that the simplified "laser-pointer assisted angle reproduction test" (LP-ART) presented here allows for clinically feasible assessment of proprioceptive shoulder function.

METHODS

Active angle reproduction capability as an aspect of sensorimotor function was evaluated with the new method in patients with shoulder instability (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 24). 15 patients had traumatic, 9 non-traumatic anterior instability (6 bilateral), 17 were treated surgically, 13 non-operatively. Tests were performed in flexion and abduction in different angles (55°, 90°, 125°) in randomized order.

RESULTS

Angle reproduction capability was worst below shoulder level (55°) in all groups. Best results were achieved at shoulder level (90°). Healthy controls showed overall better results than patients with instability. Patients after surgical stabilization had better results in 55° and 90° abduction compared to instability patients before surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The new LP-ART presented here is a technically simple, yet effective instrument for evaluation of the proprioceptive function of the shoulder. In contrast to former test setups it is feasible in daily routine. Compared to healthy controls, patients with unstable shoulder joints show significant proprioceptive disorders that can be quantified by the LP-ART.

Objective assessment of shoulder mobility with a new 3D gyroscope--a validation study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for clinical follow-up of shoulder treatment. Only a few high sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The interobserver dependency of conventional goniometer measurements is high. In the 1990s an isokinetic measuring system of BIODEX Inc. was introduced, which is a very complex but valid instrument. Since 2008 a new user-friendly system called DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) is available. Aim of this study is the validation of this measuring instrument using the BIODEX-System.

METHODS

The BIODEX is a computerized robotic dynamometer used for isokinetic testing and training of athletes. Because of its size the system needs to be installed in a separated room. The DP is a small, light-weighted three-dimensional gyroscope that is fixed on the distal upper patient arm, recording abduction, flexion and rotation. For direct comparison we fixed the DP on the lever arm of the BIODEX. The accuracy of measurement was determined at different positions, angles and distances from the centre of rotation (COR) as well as different velocities in a radius between 0° - 180° in steps of 20°. All measurements were repeated 10 times. As satisfactory accuracy a difference between both systems below 5° was defined. The statistical analysis was performed with a linear regression model.

RESULTS

The evaluation shows very high accuracy of measurements. The maximum average deviation is below 2.1°. For a small range of motion the DP is slightly underestimating comparing the BIODEX, whereas for higher angles increasing positive differences are observed. The distance to the COR as well as the position of the DP on the lever arm have no significant influence. Concerning different motion speeds significant but not relevant influence is detected. Unfortunately device related effects are observed, leading to differences between repeated measurements with any two different devices up to 8° at maximal range of motion (180°).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary the results shows high correlation and good reproducibility of measurements. All deviations are inside the tolerance interval of 5°, if one device is used. An unlikely systematic device effect is detected. These laboratory trials are promising for the validation of this system in humans. The challenge for both systems will be the changing of the COR in the shoulder joint at elevations higher than 90°.

Glenohumeral joint translation after arthroscopic thermal capsuloplasty of the rotator interval

The treatment of recurrent anterior, posterior, or multidirectional glenohumeral instability by operative closure of the rotator interval has been proposed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether arthroscopic thermal capsuloplasty of the rotator interval with the radiofrequency probe significantly decreases anterior-posterior glenohumeral translation. Anterior and posterior loads of 10, 15, and 20 N were sequentially applied to 8 cadaveric shoulder joints while mounted in a translation testing apparatus with an electromagnetic tracking device measuring anterior and posterior glenohumeral translation. Arthroscopic thermal capsuloplasty was then performed on the rotator interval with a radiofrequency probe. The identical anterior-posterior loading protocol was then repeated, and translations were recorded. The results showed a significant reduction in anterior and posterior translation after thermal capsuloplasty. After rotator interval thermal capsuloplasty, anterior translation decreased by 31.5%, 28.8%, and 27.2% for the 10-, 15-, and 20-N loads, respectively. Posterior translation decreased by 43.1%, 43.8%, and 40.7%, respectively. The results of this study indicate that arthroscopic thermal capsuloplasty of the rotator interval is an effective way by which to decrease both anterior and posterior glenohumeral translation in vitro. To date, no in vivo studies that sufficiently document long-term clinically successful outcomes of such a procedure exist. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of the biologic response to thermal shrinkage and whether these reduced glenohumeral translations will be maintained.

Measurement of anterior-to-posterior translation of the glenohumeral joint using the KT-1000

STUDY DESIGN

Single-group repeated measures.

OBJECTIVES

To adapt an existing arthrometer to allow simple quantification of glenohumeral translation and to assess the arthrometer's reliability.

BACKGROUND

The measurement of glenohumeral translation is an integral part of the clinical examination of the shoulder. However, no objective and reliable measure for glenohumeral translation has been reported.

METHODS AND MEASURES

The KT-1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer was used to measure the amount of anterior-to-posterior (AP) translation of the humeral head at the glenohumeral joints of 28 (16 women and 12 men) nonimpaired undergraduate university students (age 22.1 +/- 2.9 years). Two assessments were made (20 minutes apart), by a single tester, of the dominant and nondominant shoulders of each participant.

RESULTS

Anterior-to-posterior translation varied from 10 to 32 mm (20.9 +/- 4.9). The test-retest reliability of the KT-1000 when measuring the nondominant shoulders was good (ICC [intraclass correlation coefficient] 0.76), and it was moderate (ICC = 0.67) when measuring the dominant shoulders. The reliability findings were influenced by large amounts of random error. Analysis by ANOVA showed that compared to women (dominant shoulder, 22.6 +/- 4.6 mm; nondominant, 23.8 +/- 4.2 mm), men showed significantly less glenohumeral translation (dominant, 17.1 +/- 3.7 mm; nondominant, 18.3 +/- 3.7 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The KT-1000 arthrometer has the potential to provide therapists with a clinically viable method of measuring glenohumeral translation.