Basic Science of Spinal Instrumentation:

Adhesive Hydrogel Building Blocks to Reconstruct Complex Cartilage Tissues

Cartilage has an intrinsically low healing capacity, thereby requiring surgical intervention. However, limitations of biological grafting and existing synthetic replacements have prompted the need to produce cartilage-mimetic substitutes. Cartilage tissues perform critical functions that include load bearing and weight distribution, as well as articulation. These are characterized by a range of high moduli (≥1 MPa) as well as high hydration (60-80%). Additionally, cartilage tissues display spatial heterogeneity, resulting in regional differences in stiffness that are paramount to biomechanical performance. Thus, cartilage substitutes would ideally recapitulate both local and regional properties. Toward this goal, triple network (TN) hydrogels were prepared with cartilage-like hydration and moduli as well as adhesivity to one another. TNs were formed with either an anionic or cationic 3rd network, resulting in adhesion upon contact due to electrostatic attractive forces. With the increased concentration of the 3rd network, robust adhesivity was achieved as characterized by shear strengths of ∼80 kPa. The utility of TN hydrogels to form cartilage-like constructs was exemplified in the case of an intervertebral disc (IVD) having two discrete but connected zones. Overall, these adhesive TN hydrogels represent a potential strategy to prepare cartilage substitutes with native-like regional properties.

Emerging polymeric material strategies for cartilage repair

Cartilage is found throughout the body, serving an array of essential functions. Owing to the limited healing capacity of cartilage, damage or degeneration is often permanent and so requires clinical intervention. Established surgical techniques generally rely on biological grafting. However, recent advances in polymeric materials provide an encouraging alternative to overcome limits of auto- and allografts. For regenerative engineering of cartilage, a polymeric scaffold ideally supports and instructs tissue regeneration while also providing mechanical integrity. Scaffolds direct regeneration via chemical and mechanical cues, as well as delivery and support of exogenous cells and bioactive factors. Advanced polymeric scaffolds aim to direct regeneration locally, replicating the heterogeneities of native tissues. Alternatively, new cartilage-mimetic hydrogels have potential to serve as synthetic cartilage replacements. Prepared as multi-network or composite hydrogels, the most promising candidates have simultaneously realized the hydration, mechanical, and tribological properties of native cartilage. Collectively, the recent rise in polymers for cartilage regeneration and replacement proposes a changing paradigm, with a new generation of materials paving the way for improved clinical outcomes.

Ultra-High Modulus Hydrogels Mimicking Cartilage of the Human Body

The human body is comprised of numerous types of cartilage with a range of high moduli, despite their high hydration. Owing to the limitations of cartilage tissue healing and biological grafting procedures, synthetic replacements have emerged but are limited by poorly matched moduli. While conventional hydrogels can achieve similar hydration to cartilage tissues, their moduli are substantially inferior. Herein, triple network (TN) hydrogels are prepared to synergistically leverage intra-network electrostatic repulsive and hydrophobic interactions, as well as inter-network electrostatic attractive interactions. They are comprised of an anionic 1^st network, a neutral 2^nd network (capable of hydrophobic associations), and a cationic 3^rd network. Collectively, these interactions act synergistically as effective, yet dynamic crosslinks. By tuning the concentration of the cationic 3^rd network, these TN hydrogels achieve high moduli of ≈1.5 to ≈3.5 MPa without diminishing cartilage-like water contents (≈80%), strengths, or toughness values. This unprecedented combination of properties poises these TN hydrogels as cartilage substitutes in applications spanning articulating joints, intervertebral discs (IVDs), trachea, and temporomandibular joint disc (TMJ).

Morphometric characteristics of the thoracοlumbar and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population: a computed tomography-based study on 900 vertebrae-"Hellenic Spine Society (HSS) 2017 Award Winner"

Background

Vertebrae morphology appears to have genetic and ethnic variations. Knowledge of the vertebra and pedicle morphology is essential for proper selection and safe application of transpedicular screws. The aim of this study is to create a morphometric database for thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae (T9-L5) among individuals of both sexes in the Greek population.

Material and methods

The morphometric dimensions of T9-L5 vertebrae on computed tomography (CT) scan images were measured in 100 adults (79 males and 21 females), without spinal pathology, age from 33 to 87 years old (mean 70 ± 8.73 years). The anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), the posterior vertebral body height (PVBH), the angle formed by the upper end plate of vertebral body and the horizontal line in the sagittal plane, the inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle height and width, the angle formed by the longitudinal trajectory of the right- and left-sided pedicles and the midline anteroposterior axis of the vertebra (pedicle axis angle (PAA)), and the postero-anterior trajectory's length of the pedicle from the entry point to the anterior cortex of the vertebra (PTLP), for the right- and left-sided pedicles, were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare the differences in various morphometric characteristics between sexes. The collected data were statistically analyzed using the SAS/STAT software 3.1.3 and SPSS version 22. The statistical significance was set at the level of p < 0.05. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the measured parameters was also calculated.

Results

The L5 vertebra had the maximum AVBH with a mean of 28.47 mm (SD ± 2.55 mm) in males and 26.48 mm (SD ± 1.61 mm) in females. The maximum PVBH in males was at L1 vertebra with a mean of 27.77 mm (SD ± 1.64 mm) and in females at L2 vertebral with a mean of 27.11 mm (SD ± 1.27 mm). Regarding the left pedicle dimensions, the maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle height was at T11 with a mean of 12.86 mm (SD ± 1.26 mm) and 18.82 mm (SD ± 1.37 mm) in males and 10.24 mm (SD ± 1.88 mm) and 16.19 mm (SD ± 3.27 mm) in females, respectively. The maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle width was at L5 with a mean of 11.57 mm (SD ± 1.97 mm) and 17.08 mm (SD ± 1.97 mm) in males and 10.24 mm (SD ± 1.88 mm) and 16.27 mm (SD ± 3.27 mm) in females, respectively. The largest PAA was found at the L5 with a mean angle of 26.23° (SD ± 2.65°) in males and 23.63° (SD ± 4.59°) in females, respectively. The maximum PTLP was found at the level of L4 with a mean of 55.31 mm (SD ± 4.52 mm) in males and 48.7 mm (SD ± 4.17 mm) in females, respectively. Regarding the right pedicle dimensions, the maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle height was found at T12 with a mean of 13.03 mm (SD ± 2.01 mm) and 18.01 mm (SD ± 1.56 mm) in males and 10.24 mm (SD ± 1.23 mm) and 16.14 mm (SD ± 1.23 mm) in females, respectively. The maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle width was at L5 with a mean of 11.3 mm (SD ± 2.86 mm) and 16.34 mm (SD ± 2.98 mm) in males and 12 mm (SD ± 3.18 mm) and 15.69 mm (SD ± 2.59 mm) in females, respectively. The greater PAA was at the L5 vertebral with a mean of 25.7° (SD ± 5.19°) in males and 25.56° (SD ± 5.31°) in females, respectively. The maximum PTLP was at the level of L3 with a mean of 54.86 mm (SD ± 3.18 mm) in males and 49.01 mm (SD ± 2.97 mm) in females, respectively. At all vertebrae, the only statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two sexes was the mean PTLP of the right and the left pedicle. The L5 vertebra was found to have the largest AVBH, PAA, and pedicle width in male and female populations.

Conclusions

This study provides a database of morphometric characteristics on thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae from T9 to L5 in the Greek population. This database may prove to be of great significance for forthcoming comparative studies. It can also serve as a basis in order to detect pathological changes in the spine and furthermore to plan operative interventions. It was found that the dimensions of thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population are sex-dependent. In the current study, vertebra and pedicle dimensions seem to have some similarities compared to other Western populations. However, in the thoracolumbar region, the pedicles of T9 and T10 may hardly accommodate a 4.00-mm pedicle screw given the narrow inner cancellous pedicle width. Importantly, the vertebra and pedicle dimensions measured in the current study can be used to guide the selection of transpedicular screws in the Greek population and to guide further research.

Morphometry of the lower thoracic and lumbar pedicles and its relevance in pedicle fixation

PURPOSE

To assess the pedicle morphology in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in an Indian population and to determine the causes of pedicle wall violation by pedicle screws.

METHODS

Computerised tomographic scans of 135 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures were prospectively analysed to determine the pedicle morphology. The transverse pedicle angle, pedicle diameter and screw path length at 527 uninjured levels were measured. Post-operative CT scans of 117 patients were analysed to determine the accuracy of 468 pedicle screws at 234 vertebrae.

RESULTS

The lowest (mean ± SD) transverse pedicle width in the lower thoracic spine was 5.4 ± 0.70 mm, whereas in the lumbar spine it was 7.2 ± 0.87 mm. The shortest (mean ± SD) screw path length in lower thoracic pedicles was 35.8 ± 2.10 and 41.9 ± 2.18 mm in the lumbar spine. The mean transverse pedicle angle in the lower thoracic spine was consistently less than 5°, whereas it gradually increased from L1 through L5 from 8.5° to 30°. Forty-one screws violated the pedicle wall, due to erroneous angle of screw insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, pedicle dimensions were smaller compared to the Western population. In Indian patients, pedicle screws of 5 mm diameter and 30 mm length, and 6 mm diameter and 35 mm length can safely be used in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine, respectively. However, it is important to assess the pedicle morphology on imaging prior to pedicle fixation.

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR THE BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE HUMAN SPINE: A REVIEW

In vitro mechanical testing of spinal specimens is extremely important to better understand the biomechanics of the healthy and diseased spine, fracture, and to test/optimize surgical treatment. While spinal testing has extensively been carried out in the past four decades, testing methods are quite diverse. This paper aims to provide a critical overview of the in vitro methods for mechanical testing the human spine at different scales. Specimens of different type are used, according to the aim of the study: spine segments (two or more adjacent vertebrae) are used both to investigate the spine kinematics, and the mechanical properties of the spine components (vertebrae, ligaments, discs); single vertebrae (whole vertebra, isolated vertebral body, or vertebral body without endplates) are used to investigate the structural properties of the vertebra itself; core specimens are extracted to test the mechanical properties of the trabecular bone at the tissue-level; mechanical properties of spine soft tissue (discs, ligaments, spinal cord) are measured on isolated elements, or on tissue specimens. Identification of consistent reference frames is still a debated issue. Testing conditions feature different pre-conditioning and loading rates, depending on the simulated action. Tissue specimen preservation is a very critical issue, affecting test results. Animal models are often used as a surrogate. However, because of different structure and anatomy, extreme caution is required when extrapolating to the human spine. In vitro loading conditions should be based on reliable in vivo data. Because of the high complexity of the spine, such information (either through instrumented implants or through numerical modeling) is currently unsatisfactory. Because of the increasing ability of computational models in predicting biomechanical properties of musculoskeletal structures, a synergy is possible (and desirable) between in vitro experiments and numerical modeling. Future perspectives in spine testing include integration of mechanical and structural properties at different dimensional scales (from the whole-body-level down to the tissue-level) so that organ-level models (which are used to predict the most relevant phenomena such as fracture) include information from all dimensional scales.

Novel lumbosacral axial fixation techniques

For patients with low back pain secondary to pathological motion of an unstable lumbar motion segment, interbody fusion may be indicated. Numerous open and minimally invasive techniques have been traditionally used, but all suffer from shortcomings related to biomechanics or inherent iatrogenic destabilization. A novel transaxial approach to the lumbosacral junction has recently been described which appears to obviate many of the limitations of previous techniques. Preliminary results of the transaxial approach to lumbosacral fixation appear promising.

Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering

Biodegradable cages have received increasing attention for their use in spinal procedures involving interbody fusion to resolve complications associated with the use of nondegradable cages, such as stress shielding and long-term foreign body reaction. However, the relatively weak initial material strength compared to permanent materials and subsequent reduction due to degradation may be problematic. To design a porous biodegradable interbody fusion cage for a preclinical large animal study that can withstand physiological loads while possessing sufficient interconnected porosity for bony bridging and fusion, we developed a multiscale topology optimization technique. Topology optimization at the macroscopic scale provides optimal structural layout that ensures mechanical strength, while optimally designed microstructures, which replace the macroscopic material layout, ensure maximum permeability. Optimally designed cages were fabricated using solid, freeform fabrication of poly(ε-caprolactone) mixed with hydroxyapatite. Compression tests revealed that the yield strength of optimized fusion cages was two times that of typical human lumbar spine loads. Computational analysis further confirmed the mechanical integrity within the human lumbar spine, although the pore structure locally underwent higher stress than yield stress. This optimization technique may be utilized to balance the complex requirements of load-bearing, stress shielding, and interconnected porosity when using biodegradable materials for fusion cages.

Current status of adult spinal deformity

Purpose To review the current literature for the nonoperative and operative treatment for adult spinal deformity. Recent Findings With more than 11 million baby boomers joining the population of over 60 years of age in the United States, the incidence of lumbar deformity is greatly increasing. Recent literature suggests that a lack of evidence exists to support the effectiveness of nonoperative treatment for adult scoliosis. In regards to operative treatment, current literature reports a varying range of improved clinical outcomes, curve correction, and complication rates. The extension of fusion to S1 compared with L5 and lower thoracic levels compared with L1 remains a highly controversial topic among literature. Summary Most adult deformity patients never seek nonoperative or operative treatment. Of the few that seek treatment, many can benefit from nonoperative treatment. However, in selected patients who have failed nonoperative treatment and who are candidates for surgical intervention, the literature reflects positive outcomes related to surgical intervention as compared with nonoperative treatment despite varying associated ranges in morbidity and mortality rates. If nonoperative therapy fails in addressing a patient's complaints, then an appropriate surgical procedure that relieves neural compression, corrects excessive sagittal or coronal imbalance, and results in a solidly fused, pain-free spine is warranted.

Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus intralaminar C2 fixation in C2-C6 subaxial constructs

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative rigidity of C2 transpedicular versus intralaminar fixation with and without offset connectors in C2-C6 subaxial constructs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Insufficient biomechanical data exists on C2 laminar fixation in subaxial constructs, and no study has considered C2-C6 subaxial constructs or the use of offset connectors.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spines underwent rigidity testing in the intact condition and after a destabilizing C3-C6 laminectomy. Specimens were instrumented with 20 mm pedicle and 20 mm intralaminar screws at C2, and with 14 mm lateral mass screws from C3-C6. In random order, three conditions (C2 pedicle screws, C2 laminar screws, and C2 laminar screws with offset connectors) were tested in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending.

RESULTS

Laminar screws in C2-C6 constructs were equivalent to transpedicular fixation in flexion-extension (P = 0.985), were significantly more rigid than pedicle screws in axial rotation (P = 0.002), and were significantly less rigid than pedicle screws in lateral bending (P = 0.002). Laminar screw constructs were more rigid than the intact condition in all planes.

In vitro biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus translaminar C-2 screw fixation in C2–3 instrumentation

Object

In instrumentation of the upper cervical spine, placement of pedicle screws into C-2 is generally safe, although there is the potential for injury to the vertebral arteries. Owing to this risk, translaminar screws into C-2 have been used. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of the in vitro cadaveric spine using C-2 laminar compared with C-2 pedicle screws in C2–3 instrumentation.

Methods

Eight fresh frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C1–6) were potted at C1–2 and C5–6. Pure moments in increments of 0.3 Nm to a maximum of 1.5 Nm were applied in flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Each specimen was tested sequentially in three modes: 1) intact; 2) C2 pedicle screw–C3 lateral mass fixation; and 3) C2 laminar screw–C3 lateral mass fixation. The sequence of fixation testing was randomized. Motion was tracked with reflective markers attached to C-2 and C-3.

Results

Spinal levels with instrumentation showed significantly less motion than the intact spine in all directions and with all loads greater than 0.3 Nm (p < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference between C2 pedicle screw–C3 lateral mass fixation and C2 laminar screw–C3 lateral mass fixation, generally the former type of fixation was associated with less motion than the latter.

Conclusions

When pedicle screws in C-2 are contraindicated or inappropriate, laminar screws in C-2 offer a safe and acceptable option for posterior instrumentation.

Advances in orthotics and bracing

Understanding of the adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) continues to grow, as does the sophistication of orthotics and braces used to treat this disorder. This article reviews these advances and some of the devices commonly used to treat patients who have AAFD. Additionally, the recent proliferation and potential implications of mass-manufactured products is discussed.

Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Biomechanical studies of artificial discs that quantify parameters such as load sharing and stresses have been reported in literature for single-level disc placements. However, literature on the effects of using the Charité artificial disc (ChD) at two levels (2LChD) as compared with one-level fusion (using a cage [CG] and a pedicle screw system) plus one-level artificial disc combination (CGChD) is sparse.

PURPOSE

To determine the effects of the 2LChD and CGChD across the implanted and adjacent segments.

STUDY DESIGN

A finite element model of a L3-S1 segment was used to compare the biomechanical effects of the ChD placed at two lower levels (2LChD model) with L5-S1 fusion (using a CG and a pedicle screw system) plus L4-L5 level ChD placement combination (CGChD model).

METHODS

We used our recently published and experimentally validated L3-S1 finite element model for the present study. The intact model was subjected to 400 N axial compression and 10.6 Nm of flexion/extension moments. The experimental constructs described above were then subjected to 400 N axial compression and a moment that produced overall motion equal to the intact model predictions (hybrid testing protocol). Resultant motion, loads across facets, and other parameters were analyzed at the experimental and adjacent levels.

RESULTS

In flexion, the bending moments for the CGChD and 2LChD models were 15.4 Nm (fusion effect) and 7.3 Nm (increase in flexibility effect), respectively in comparison to 10.6 Nm for the intact model. The corresponding values in the extension mode were 11.2 Nm and 7.2 Nm. The predicted flexion rotations across the L5-S1 segment for the CGChD decreased by 76% (fusion effect), and increased at the L4-L5 and the L3-L4 levels by 68.5% and 28%, respectively. In the extension mode, motion across the L5-S1 segment decreased by 96.4% whereas it increased 74.6% and 18.2% across the L4-L5 and L3-L4 levels, respectively. For the 2LChD model, the flexion rotation across the L5-S1 segment increased by 28.2%. The motions across the L4-L5 and L3-L4 segments decreased by 12% and 24%, respectively. In extension, the corresponding changes were 10% increase, 10% increase, and 21% decrease at the L5-S1, L4-L5, and L3-L4 levels, respectively. The facet loads were in line with the changes in motion, except for the 2LChD case.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes at L3-L4 level for both of the cases were of similar magnitude (approximately 25%), although in the CGChD model it increased and in the 2LChD model it decreased. The changes in motion at the L4-L5 level were large for the CGChD model as compared with the 2LChD model predictions (approximately 70% increase vs. 10% increase). It is difficult to speculate if an increase in motion across a segment, as compared with the intact case, is more harmful than a decrease in motion.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device

BACKGROUND

Interbody arthrodesis is employed in the lumbar spine to eliminate painful motion and achieve stability through bony fusion. Bone grafts, metal cages, composite spacers, and growth factors are available and can be placed through traditional open techniques or minimally invasively. Whether placed anteriorly, posteriorly, or laterally, insertion of these implants necessitates compromise of the anulus--an inherently destabilizing procedure. A new axial percutaneous approach to the lumbosacral spine has been described. Using this technique, vertical access to the lumbosacral spine is achieved percutaneously via the presacral space. An implant that can be placed across a motion segment without compromise to the anulus avoids surgical destabilization and may be advantageous for interbody arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro biomechanical performance of the axial fixation rod, an anulus sparing, centrally placed interbody fusion implant for motion segment stabilization.

METHOD OF APPROACH

Twenty-four bovine lumbar motion segments were mechanically tested using an unconstrainedflexibility protocol in sagittal and lateral bending, and torsion. Motion segments were also tested in axial compression. Each specimen was tested in an intact state, then drilled (simulating a transaxial approach to the lumbosacral spine), then with one of two axial fixation rods placed in the spine for stabilization. The range of motion, bending stiffness, and axial compressive stiffness were determined for each test condition. Results were compared to those previously reported for femoral ring allografts, bone dowels, BAK and BAK Proximity cages, Ray TFC, Brantigan ALIF and TLIF implants, the InFix Device, Danek TIBFD, single and double Harms cages, and Kaneda, Isola, and University plating systems.

RESULTS

While axial drilling of specimens had little effect on stiffness and range of motion, specimens implanted with the axial fixation rod exhibited significant increases in stiffness and decreases in range of motion relative to intact state. When compared to existing anterior, posterior, and interbody instrumentation, lateral and sagittal bending stiffness of the axial fixation rod exceeded that of all other interbody devices, while stiffness in extension and axial compression were comparable to plate and rod constructs. Torsional stiffness was comparable to other interbody constructs and slightly lower than plate and rod constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

For stabilization of the L5-S1 motion segment, axial placement of implants offers potential benefits relative to traditional exposures. The preliminary biomechanical data from this study indicate that the axial fixation rod compares favorably to other devices and may be suitable to reduce pathologic motion at L5-S1, thus promoting bony fusion.

Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol

STUDY DESIGN

Finite element model of L3-S1 segment and confirmatory cadaveric testing were used to investigate the biomechanical effects of a mobile core type artificial disc (Charité artificial disc; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA) on the lumbar spine.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of the Charité artificial disc across the implanted and adjacent segments.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Biomechanical studies of artificial discs that quantify parameters, like the load sharing and stresses, are sparse in the literature, especially for mobile-type core artificial disc designs. In addition, there is no standard protocol for studying the adjacent segmental effects of such implants.

METHODS

Human osteo-ligamentous spines (L1-S1) were tested before and after L5-S1 Charité artificial disc placement. The data were used to validate further an intact 3-dimensional (3-D) nonlinear L3-S1 finite element model. The model was subjected to 400-N axial compression and 10.6 Nm of flexion/extension pure moments (load control) or pure moments that produced the overall rotation of the L3-S1 Charité model equal to the intact case (hybrid approach). Resultant motion, load, and stress parameters were analyzed at the experimental and adjacent levels.

RESULTS

Finite element model validation was achieved only with the load-controlled experiments. The hybrid approach, believed to be more clinically relevant, revealed that Charité artificial disc leads to motion increases in flexion (19%) and extension (44%) at the L5-S1 level. At the instrumented level, the decrease in the facet loads was less than at the adjacent levels; the corresponding decrease being 26% at L3-L4, 25% at L4-L5, and 13.4% at L5-S1 when compared to the intact. Intradiscal pressure changes in the L4-L5 and L3-L4 segments were minimal. Shear stresses at the Charité artificial disc-L5 endplate interface were higher than those at S1 interface. However, in the load control mode, the increase in facet loads in extension was approximately 14%, as compared to the intact case.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid testing protocol is advocated because it better reproduces clinical observations in terms of motion following surgery, using pure moments. Using this approach, we found that the Charité artificial disc placement slightly increases motion at the implanted level, with a resultant increase in facet loading when compared to the adjacent segments, while the motions and loads decrease at the adjacent levels. However, in the load control mode that we believe is not that clinically relevant, there was a large increase in motion and a corresponding increase in facet loads, as compared to the intact.

Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study of C1-C2 posterior fusion techniques using a cadaveric model.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the acute stability afforded across the atlantoaxial segment by a novel technique that uses intralaminar screws in C2, and to compare these results to the stability obtained using a C2 pedicle fixation technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are numerous techniques available for rigidly coupling C1 and C2. It has been shown that screw techniques provide higher acute stability than wiring practices. However, many of these methods that use screw fixation in C2 can be technically difficult, especially in cases in which there is an aberrant vertebral artery course or if the C2 pedicle is not large enough to accommodate the instrumentation. A novel technique that uses intralaminar screws in C2 with C1 pedicle screws and bilateral longitudinal rods has been recently developed in an effort to overcome many of these issues. To date, there are no published reports as to whether this new technique provides equivalent (or better) fixation to the currently accepted methods.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C0-C4) were used in this study. Specimens were tested in their intact condition after destabilization via odontoidectomy, and after implantation of 3 different fixation constructs: (1) the Harms technique, 2 pedicle screws in C2, (2) a single C2 pedicle screw and a single C2 intralaminar screw, and (3) a construct having bilateral intralaminar C2 screws. Pure moment loading in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was applied to the occiput. Subsequent relative intervertebral rotations were determined using a 3 camera system. Range of motion for the intact, destabilized, and 3 fixation scenarios was determined, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance Fisher least-significant-difference post hoc test for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The data indicate that odontoidectomy significantly increased C1-C2 motion in flexion/extension and lateral bending. All 3 fixation techniques significantly reduced motion compared to the intact and destabilized cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the C2 intralaminar and pedicle screw techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The results clearly indicate the potential of the intralaminar screw technique to provide stability that is equivalent to methods currently used. Given the serious complications that can follow vertebral artery injury and the decreased likelihood of injury by avoiding placement of C2 pedicle screw(s) and C1-C2 transarticular screw(s), strong consideration should be given to using a construct that incorporates C2 intralaminar screw(s).

Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study of C4-C5 intervertebral disc replacement using a cadaveric model.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the degree of motion afforded by a ball-and-socket cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis design.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intervertebral disc prostheses designs attempt to restore or maintain cervical disc motion after anterior cervical discectomy and reduce the likelihood of accelerated degeneration in adjacent discs by maintaining normal motion at the affected disc level. Surprisingly, the actual kinetic and biomechanical effects that cervical disc arthroplasty imparts on the spine have not been widely reported. Accordingly, we investigated what effect implanting a cervical disc prosthesis has on the range of motion at the affected level as well as how it changes the coupled motion patterns at the level of implantation.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-C7) were used in this study. We evaluated two different spinal conditions: intact and after disc replacement at C4-C5. Compression (using the follower load concept) and pure moment loading were applied to the specimen. Range of motion was measured using an optical tracking system. Statistical differences between the intact and replaced condition range of motion was determined using analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

The data indicate that the intervertebral disc prosthesis approximated the intact motion in all three rotation planes at the affected level. Finally, changes in cervical coupled rotations, specifically lateral bending during axial rotation loading and axial rotation during lateral bending loading, were not statistically significant between the two tested conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that a ball-and-socket design can replicate physiologic motion at the affected and adjacent levels. More importantly, the data indicate that motion coupling, which is most dramatic in the cervical spine and plays an important biomechanical role, is maintained.

Human lumbar facet joint capsule strains: II. Alteration of strains subsequent to anterior interbody fixation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In cases of low back pain associated with biomechanical lumbar instability, anterior interbody fixation can be used as a surgical treatment, but its affect on facet joint capsule strains is unknown.

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of a single-level anterolateral interbody fixation, the changes in lumbar facet joint capsule strains at the level of and adjacent to the fixation were evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Human cadaveric lumbar spine specimens were tested under displacement control before and after the addition of a single anterior thoracolumbar plate (ATLP) on the L4-L5 motion body.

METHODS

Ligamentous lumbar spine specimens (n=7) were potted and actuated before and after fixation of the L4-L5 motion segment with an ATLP in motions of extension, flexion, left and right bending. Joint moments were calculated from the applied load and respective moment arms. Intervertebral angulation was measured using biaxial inclinometers mounted onto adjacent vertebrae. Plane strains of the capsules were measured by optically tracking the displacements of small, infrared reflective markers glued to capsule surfaces. Statistical differences (p<.05) in moment, intervertebral angle and capsular strain were assessed using analysis of variance and comparison of linear regression lines.

RESULTS

Fixation resulted in an increase in moment at the three vertebral levels for all motions. There was also an increase in intervertebral angle at L3-L4 and L5-S1, and a decrease in intervertebral angle at L4-L5 for all motions. Plane strains in the L3-L4 and L5-S1 facet capsules increased as a result of the fixation. L4-L5 facet capsules experienced decreased and increased strains ipsilateral and contralateral, respectively, to the instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

Restriction of a vertebral motion segment using a single ATLP increased adjacent capsular strains, which if suprathreshold for capsule nociceptors, could play a role in low back pain.

Materials and design of spinal implants--a review

Man-made devices have been implanted into the body to relieve pain, to restore function, and to facilitate healing. The subjects of this review are the materials, and to a lesser extent, the design aspects of the numerous implants that are available to the surgeon in dealing with the ailing spine. Often it is the material aspects of such devices that are responsible for their success or failure. It may be that osteoconductive properties are desired for implants to assist fusion, whereas as inert a material as possible would be preferred for interpositional barriers. The materials composing the instrumentation used to facilitate healing of spinal fractures would ideally have properties that optimize strength and biocompatibility, while at the same time minimizing imaging artifacts and allowing a gradual transfer of load from the instrumentation to the vertebral body (i.e., viscoelastic effects). The application of biomaterials and biomechanics to the design of spinal devices is obvious; what may be more subtle though is what the in vivo interactions of these will be. The study of such aspects must continue in order to better evolve the designs and subsequent results of implanted spinal devices.

Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing posterior fixation device and its equivalent conventional device in a calf spine model

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro test of calf spine lumbar segments to compare biomechanical stabilization of a rigid versus a dynamic posterior fixation device.

OBJECTIVES

To compare flexibility of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device with an equivalent rigid device.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Dynamic pedicle screw device studies are not as prevalent in the literature as studies of rigid devices. These devices contain the potential to enhance load sharing and optimize fusion potential while maintaining stability similar to that of rigid systems.

METHODS

Load-displacement tests were performed on intact and stabilized calf spines for the dynamic and rigid devices. Stability across a destabilized L3-L4 segment was restored by insertion of either a 6 mm x 40 mm dynamic or rigid pedicle screw fixation device across the L2-L4 segment. The screws then were removed, 7 mm x 45 mm pedicle screws of the opposite type were inserted, and the construct then was re-tested. Axial pull-out tests were performed to assess the likely effects of pedicle screw replacement on the load-displacement data.

RESULTS

Results indicated a 65% reduction in motion in flexion-extension and a 90% reduction in lateral bending across the destabilized level for both devices, compared with intact spine values. Reduction in axial rotation motion was much smaller than in other modes. Axial pull-out tests showed no weakening of the bone-screw interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices provided significant stability of similar magnitudes in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. In axial rotation, the devices only could restore stability to levels similar to those in an intact spine. The dynamic device offers a design that may enhance load sharing without sacrificing construct stability.

Hardware failure in an unconstrained lumbar pedicle screw system. A 2-year follow-up study

STUDY DESIGN

A consecutive study of patients who underwent lumbar spinal arthrodesis with an unconstrained pedicle screw system.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of arthrodesis and of clinical success and to examine and characterize the cases of hardware failure with the AO/Dynamic Compression Plate system (Synthes, Paoli, PA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the advantages and disadvantages of nonconstrained versus constrained systems have been studied extensively, instrumentation failure has not. Additionally, the association between pseudarthrosis and hardware failure per se is unclear.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive cases of lumbar spinal fusion are reviewed. Standard outcome scores based on pain relief and medication usage were tabulated, along with pertinent demographic data. The patients were observed at five intervals after surgery for at least 2 years (range, 24 to 35 months; mean, 27 months). Standard statistical analyses were used to analyze data. Status of the arthrodesis was determined by standard radiographic criteria.

RESULTS

The overall fusion rate was 61%. At final follow-up, 60% of patients believed that their back pain had improved, whereas 70% believed that their limb pain had improved. The presence of a solid fusion (r = 3.3, P = 0.010) was correlated positively with a successful clinical outcome; the presence of pseudarthrosis and preoperative narcotic use were negatively correlated with a successful clinical outcome. Twenty-two percent of patients (16) experienced hardware failure. Twelve of the 16 had pseudarthrosis; in the majority of these patients, hardware failure occurred at the level of the pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate an extremely high rate of hardware failure and pseudarthrosis using an unconstrained pedicle screw system. Interestingly, the initial rate of pain relief was higher and declined over time and was quite possibly associated with loosening of the hardware. Based on these data, it is difficult to recommend the use of an unconstrained fixation system in the lumbar spine.

Mechanical testing of instrumentation. A test of mechanics

Spinal instrumentation has a primarily mechanical function, but mechanical testing procedures are designed more by expediency than by their ability to evaluate whether instrumentation will produce a good clinical outcome. Differing testing protocols preclude direct comparisons between measurements made in different laboratories. However, standardization of testing may not resolve the fact that much of the information from laboratory testing cannot be used in surgical decision-making. Researchers and journals that publish their work should focus on determining the mechanical requirements of instrumentation, including in vivo loading, the biologic response to instrumentation in the presence of pathology, and how this information can assist surgeons in selecting instrumentation in individual cases.

Biomechanical testing sequelae relevant to spinal fusion and instrumentation

The increasing prevalence of spinal disorders and associated treatments has produced a dramatic increase in the number of available devices. The biomechanical evaluation leading to the design, development, and implementation of spinal instrumentation has resulted in a number of in vitro and in vivo testing methods. This article reviews some of the methods and associated results obtained by various evaluation techniques of spinal fusion hardware. Current work and future considerations also are presented.