Computer assisted knee replacement

Patient-specific instrumentation for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomies in the management of medial compartment osteoarthritis yields high accuracy and low complication rates: A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

There has been growing interest in the use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to maximise accuracy and minimise the risk of major complications for medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies (MOW-HTOs). Numerous studies have reported the efficacy and safety of implementing this technology into clinical practice, yet no systematic review summarising the clinical literature on PSI for MOW-HTOs has been performed to date.

AIM

The aim of this investigation was to perform a systematic review summarising the evidence surrounding the use of PSI for MOW-HTOs in the management of medial compartment osteoarthritis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were queried in October 2021 for studies that used PSI for MOW-HTOs when managing medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Primary outcomes included accuracy in coronal plane correction (mechanical medial proximal tibial angle), sagittal plane correction (posterior tibial slope), and mechanical axis correction (hip-knee-ankle angle [HKA], mechanical femorotibial angle, and weight-bearing line). Accuracy was defined as error between post-operative measurements relative to the planned pre-operative correction. A secondary outcome was the incidence of major complications.

FINDINGS

This review included eight different techniques among the 14 included studies. There was a weighted mean error of 0.5° (range: 0.1°-1.3°) for the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, 0.6° (range: 0.3°-2.7°) for the posterior tibial slope, and 0.8° (range: 0.1°-1.0°) for the hip-knee-ankle angle. Four studies compared the correctional error of the mechanical axis between conventional techniques and PSI techniques. The comparative difference between the two techniques favoured the use of PSI for MOW-HTOs (standardised mean difference ​= ​0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.87; p ​= ​0.004). Among the 14 studies evaluated, four studies explicitly reported no major complications, while five studies reported a non-zero incidence of major complications. Among these nine studies, the weighted mean major complication rate was 7.1% (range: 0.0-13.0%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this present systematic review suggest that the use of PSI for MOW-HTOs leads to high accuracy relative to the planned corrections in the coronal plane, sagittal plane, and mechanical axis. Furthermore, these findings would suggest there is a low risk of major complications when implementing PSI for MOW-HTOs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review; IV.

The Definition of the Tibial Sagittal Plane and the Paradox of Imageless Navigation and Robotics: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The accuracy, precision, and repeatability by which the tibial sagittal plane can be found with imageless technology is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify any differences between imageless and image-based technology to define the sagittal plane of the tibia.

METHODS

A computed tomography (CT) was obtained of 18 cadavers with the knee fully extended. The surgical trans-epicondylar axis and several tibial rotation references were acquired on the CT scan. After a medial parapatellar approach, the same anatomical landmarks were acquired in vivo. In the horizontal plane, the angle between the surgical trans-epicondylar axis and the tibial rotational axes was assessed.

RESULTS

Highest accuracy was found for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL, -1.48°, standard deviation [SD] 13.64; imageless), tibial medial condyle (TMC)-tibial lateral condyle (TLC, 1.72°, SD 4.24; image-based), the ACL-medial border of tibial tuberosity (MTT, -2.89°, SD 18.86; image-based). Highest precision was acquired with image-based technology: TMC-TLC (SD 4.24), PCL-ACL (SD 5.86), and PCL-medial third of tibial tuberosity (M3TT, SD 7.10). Excellent intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients were observed with image-based technology: PCL-MTT, anterior medial condyle (AMC)-anterior lateral condyle (ALC), and TMC-TLC (Intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients 0.90-0.98).

CONCLUSION

The tibial sagittal plane could be defined with highest accuracy, precision, and repeatability on a preoperative CT. Imageless methodology lacked the precision and repeatability of image-based technology. With the current pursuit of high accuracy and precision in total knee arthroplasty, the reference frame used to quantify implant position should be highly accurate and precise as well.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case Series.

Navigation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: State of the art

Computer navigation (CN) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery has been used mainly for two purposes: to enhance the accuracy of tunnel position and to evaluate the kinematics of the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and the stability achieved by different surgical techniques. Many studies have shown that navigation may improve the accuracy of anatomical tunnel orientation and position during ACL reconstructive surgery compared with normal arthroscopic tunnel placement, especially regarding the femoral side. At the same time, it has become the gold-standard method for intraoperative knee kinematic assessment, as it permits a quantitative multidirectional knee joint laxity evaluation. CN in ACL surgery has been associated with diverse problems. First, in most optic systems additional skin incisions and drill holes in the femoral bone are required for fixation of a reference frame to the femur. Second, additional radiation exposure and extra medical cost to the patient for preoperative planning are usually needed. Third, CN, due to additional steps, has more opportunities for error during preoperative planning, intraoperative registration, and operation. Fourth, soft tissues, including the skin and subcutaneous tissues, are usually not considered during the preoperative planning, which can be a problem for kinematic and stability assessment. Many studies have concluded that ACLR using a CN system is more expensive than conventional surgery, it adds extra time to the surgery and it is not mitigated by better clinical outcomes. This, combined with costs and invasiveness, has limited the use of CN to research-related cases. Future technology should prioritize less invasive intra-operative surgical navigation.

Trends in Computer-Assisted Surgery for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Germany: An Analysis Based on the Operative Procedure Classification System between 2010 to 2021

Alignment strategies for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have changed significantly over time with a shift towards a more individualized alignment goal. At the same time, computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has gained interest for intraoperative control and accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment. Despite the often discussed benefits and drawbacks of robotics and navigation for TKA, the routine use of these new devices on a day-to-day basis remains obscure. Therefore, nationwide hospital billing data based on the Operation Procedure Classification System (OPS) were retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany for the period from 2010 to 2021. OPS codes for primary total knee arthroplasty (OPS code: 5-822*) were further analyzed regarding the usage of computer navigation (additional OPS code: 5-988) or robotic devices (additional OPS code: 5-987). Gender and age at the time of surgery were also assessed. The results show a total of 2,226,559 primary TKAs were implanted between 2010 and 2021, of which 2,044,914 were performed conventionally (91.84% of all TKAs). A total of 170,276 TKAs were performed using navigation technique (7.65% of all TKAs) and another 11,369 TKAs were performed using robotics (0.51% of all TKAs). For the period from 2018 to 2021, a substantial increase in robot-assisted TKA (R-TKA) was observed, with an average increase rate of 84.74% per year, while the number of navigated TKAs declined (-3.67% per year). Computer-assisted surgery, and particularly robotics for TKA, are seeing growing popularity and stepwise translation into routine clinical use in Germany, with a steep increase rate of more than 80% per year since 2018. Nevertheless, the majority of TKAs are still performed using manual instrumentation, rendering conventional TKA the currently unchanged gold standard.

[Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

After more than two decades of experience with computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, extensive experience and study data are available, allowing a profound evaluation. Undoubtedly, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has been proven to achieve excellent results for implant positioning and long-leg axis reconstruction. Thus, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty represents the current gold standard to avoid unintended malpositioning of total knee components for neutrally aligned implants and individualized implant alignment (kinematic alignment, adjusted mechanical alignment, and others). Previous studies could not show significant differences in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, recent meta-analyses showed relevant advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. These results could be based on further developments in software-assisted soft tissue balancing and more sensitive evaluation methods of follow-up examinations.

LONG-TERM OUTCOME

Further, international registries show advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty regarding long-term outcomes. In particular, the Australian arthroplasty registry describes a significantly lower revision rate due to aseptic loosening/osteolysis in the computer-assisted knee arthroplasty group, analyzing a period of up to 17 years. These positive effects can already be proven six months following surgery.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

However, despite demonstrated benefits, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has not yet become established in daily routine, and wide regional variations in its use are observed. Newer developments such as robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty, primarily based on navigation techniques, are currently being heavily promoted. However, this new technology must justify its enormous additional costs and prove its advantages compared to computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. In the backdrop of the development of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, this might be a difficult task.

Status and future of modern technologies in arthroplasty : Results of a survey of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU)

BACKGROUND

The orthopedic community is divided on the question of whether modern technologies in arthroplasty improve outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this initiative of the working group on intraoperative imaging and technology integration (Arbeitsgemeinschaft intraoperative Bildgebung und Technologieintegration, AGiTEC) is to initiate the collection of additional data for the scientific evaluation of modern technologies.

QUESTION

To what extent are modern technologies currently used and which implementations are planned? Do the members of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) consider the acquisition of additional data for scientific assessment necessary?

METHODS

Members of the DGOU were asked via an e‑mail survey about the distribution and projected introduction of modern technologies in arthroplasty. They were also asked whether sufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation and whether acquisition of additional data in studies or arthroplasty registries were considered necessary.

RESULTS

Of the 7923 probands surveyed, 428 completed the questionnaire in full (5.4%). It was found that individual implants and navigation are currently the most frequently used (31% and 29%, respectively). The largest increases in the next 2 years are projected for virtual reality and robotics (+30% and +23%, respectively), 85% of respondents indicated that insufficient data were collected for scientific evaluation, and 89% each requested initiation of multicenter studies and inclusion of technologies in the arthroplasty registry.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study should motivate the scientific community, industry, and those responsible for the arthroplasty registries to collect and analyze data for the scientific assessment of modern technologies.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Resection and Varus Correction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study Using Computer-Assisted Surgery

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Accuracy of different navigation systems for femoral and tibial implantation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised comparative study

PURPOSE

It remains to be established whether optical computed tomography (CT)-free and acceleration-based navigation systems differ in terms of implantation accuracy and clinical outcomes for total knee arthroplasty. This randomised prospective study compared the implantation accuracy of these two navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Optical CT-free navigation (ExactechGPS) or acceleration-based navigation (KneeAlign2) was randomly assigned to the left or right knee of 45 patients who underwent a single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: the ExactechGPS (n = 45) and KneeAlign2 groups (n = 45) were compared. Component alignments were evaluated using three-dimensional computed tomography and radiography at pre- and post-surgery. Implantation accuracy of the component alignment, proportion of outliers, postoperative range of motion, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were compared between the systems.

RESULTS

The implantation accuracies of the lower-extremity mechanical alignment, coronal femoral component angle, coronal tibial component angle, sagittal femoral component, axial femoral angle, and axial tibial angle had no significant difference between the groups. The implantation accuracy of the sagittal tibial component angle was superior in the ExactechGPS than the KneeAlign2 group (1.3° vs. 1.8°, P = 0.034). The proportions of outliers, range of motion, and JOA score had no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In the tibial sagittal plane, there was a significant difference in the implantation accuracy, but its difference did not affect the clinical outcomes. Both navigation systems have clinically acceptable implantation accuracy.

After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?

Background

Limb and implant alignment along with soft tissue balance plays a vital role in the outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer navigation for TKA was first introduced in 1997 with the aim of implanting the prosthetic components with accuracy and precision. This review discusses the technique, current status, and scientific evidence pertaining to computer-navigated TKA.

Body

The adoption of navigated TKA has slowly but steadily increased across the globe since its inception 25 years ago. It has been more rapid in some countries like Australia than others, like the UK. Contemporary, large console-based navigation systems help control almost every aspect of TKA, including the depth and orientation of femoral and tibial resections, soft-tissue release, and customization of femoral and tibial implant positions in order to obtain desired alignment and balance. Navigated TKA results in better limb and implant alignment and reduces outliers as compared to conventional TKA. However, controversy still exists over whether improved alignment provides superior function and longevity. Surgeons may also be hesitant to adopt this technology due to the associated learning curve, slightly increased surgical time, fear of pin site complications, and the initial set-up cost. Furthermore, the recent advent of robotic-assisted TKA which provides benefits like precision in bone resections and avoiding soft-tissue damage due to uncontrolled sawing, in addition to those of computer navigation, might be responsible for the latter technology taking a backseat.

Conclusion

This review summarizes the current state of computer-navigated TKA. The superiority of computer navigation to conventional TKA in improving accuracy is well established. Robotic-assisted TKA provides enhanced functionality as compared to computer navigation but is significantly more expensive. Whether robotic-assisted TKA offers any substantive advantages over navigation is yet to be conclusively proven. Irrespective of the form, the use of computer-assisted TKA is on the rise worldwide and is here to stay.

Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Backgroud

Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes.

Methods

A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weight-bearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis.

Results

No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group.

Conclusions

The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time.

Accelerometer-Based Portable Navigation System Is Useful for Tibial Bone Cutting in Modified Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Several studies have reported better clinical outcomes following kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) than mechanically aligned TKA. Consistent reproduction of a KA-TKA is aided by accurate tibial bone resections using computer navigation systems. This study compares an accelerometer-based portable navigation system with a conventional navigation system on tibial bone resection and clinical outcomes in KA-TKA. This study included 60 knees of patients who underwent primary KA-TKA between May 2015 and September 2017. They were randomly assigned to the OrthoPilot and iASSIST groups. A tibial bone cut was performed with 3 degree varus and 7 degree posterior slope in relation to the mechanical axis in all cases. The tibial component angle (TCA) and posterior slope angle (PSA) were evaluated by postoperative radiography, and those that deviated more than 2 degree were set as outliers. The clinical outcomes were the knee range of motion (ROM) and 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) evaluated at 1 year postoperation. The groups were compared in terms of the TCA, PSA, number of outliers, ROM, and 2011 KSS (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the mean TCA, PSA, number of outliers, ROM, and categories of the 2011 KSS (objective knee indicators, symptoms, satisfaction, expectations, and functional activities). Although tibial bone cuts were performed with 3 degree varus and 7 degree posterior slope, no significant difference was observed between the OrthoPilot and iASSIST groups in terms of the accuracy of cuts or postoperative clinical result. The iASSIST was found to be a simple and useful navigation system for KA-TKA.

Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials

The main purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis comparing functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using either computer navigation (NAV-TKA) or conventional methods (CON-TKA) from the latest assemblage of evidence. This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. All Level I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane that compared functional outcomes after NAV- and CON-TKA were included in the review. Selected end points for random effects, pairwise meta-analysis included Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), KS Function Score (KSFS), KS Total Score (KSTS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion at three arbitrary follow-up times. A total of 24 prospective RCTs comprising 3,778 knees were included from the initial search. At long-term follow-up (>5 years), NAV-TKA exhibited significantly better raw KSKS (p = 0.001) (low-quality evidence), contrary to CON-TKA, which reflected significantly better raw KSTS (p = 0.004) (high-quality evidence). While change scores (KSKS, WOMAC) from preoperative values favor CON-TKA at short-term (<6 months) and medium-term follow-up (6-60 months), long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest the superiority of NAV-TKA over CON-TKA (p = 0.02) (very low-quality evidence). Overall, sizeable dispersion of nonstatistically significant functional outcomes in the medium term was observed to eventually converge in the long term, with less differences in functional outcome scores between the two treatment methods in short- and long-term follow-up. While raw functional outcome scores reflect no differences between NAV and CON-TKA, long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest superiority of NAV-TKA over its conventional counterpart. Prospective studies with larger power are required to support the pattern of diminishing differences in functional outcome scores from medium- to long-term follow-up between the two modalities.

The accelerometer-based navigation system demonstrated superior radiological outcomes in restoring mechanical alignment and component sagittal positioning in total knee arthroplasty

Background

This study aimed to determine whether the accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) could improve the accuracy of restoring mechanical axis (MA), component positioning, and clinical outcomes compared to conventional (CON) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A total of 301 consecutive patients (ABN: 27, CON: 274) were included. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups according to preoperative demographic and clinical parameters. The postoperative MA, femoral coronal angle (FCA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), tibial coronal angle (TCA) and tibial sagittal angle (TSA) were compared. Absolute deviations of aforementioned angles were calculated as the absolute value of difference between the exact and ideal value and defined as norms if within 3°, otherwise regarded as outliers. Additional clinical parameters, including the Knee Society knee and function scores (KSKS and KSFS) and range of motion (ROM), were assessed at final follow-up (FU) (mean FU was 21.88 and 21.56 months respectively for ABN and CON group). A secondary subgroup analysis and comparison on clinical outcomes were conducted between norms and outliers in different radiological parameters.

Results

A total of 98 patients/102 knees were analyzed after the PSM (ABN: 21 patients/24 knees, CON: 77 patients/78 knees). In the ABN group, the mean MA, FCA and TSA were significantly improved (p = 0.019, 0.006, < 0.001, respectively). Proportions of TKAs within a ± 3°deviation were significantly improved in all the postoperative radiological variables except for TCA (p = 0.003, 0.021, 0.042, 0.013, respectively for MA, FCA, FSA, and TSA). The absolute deviations of FSA and TSA were also significantly lower in the ABN group (p = 0.020, 0.048, respectively). No significant differences were found in either mean value, absolute deviation or outlier ratio of TCA between two groups. On clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences between two groups, although KSKS, KSFS and ROM (p < 0.01, respectively) dramatically improved compared to baseline. The subgroup analysis also demonstrated no statistical difference on clinical outcomes between the outliers and norms in varied radiological parameters.

Conclusions

The ABN could improve the accuracy and precision of mechanical alignment and component positioning without significant improvement of clinical outcomes. Further high quality studies with long term FU are warranted to comprehensively evaluate the value of the ABN.

Limb and component alignment after total knee arthroplasty comparing 28 consecutive iAssist and 28 conventional TKAs: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess limb and component alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on long leg X-rays and to compare the use of iAssist, an accelerometric based computer-assisted device (CAD), with conventional jigs.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 56 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA by a single surgeon into this study. In the first 28 patients iAssist navigation system was utilized and in the following 28 conventional jigs were used. The groups were comparable with regard to age, sex distribution, body mass index and preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Our aim was to restore neutral coronal alignment and a five degree tibial slope.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative mechanical axis was 179.4° in the CAD group and 180.1° in the conventional group (P = 0.187). There were five TKAs deviating more than three degrees from neutral (18.5%) in the conventional group and none in the CAD group (P = 0.051). The mean femoral mechanical-condyles-angle was significantly closer (P < 0.001) to our target of 90° in the conventional group but contained more outliers (P = 0.67). The sagittal tibial slope was closer (P = 0.047) to our target of 85° in CAD-navigated TKAs with fewer outliers (P < 0.0001). The Oxford Knee Score showed comparable (P = 0.271) and good clinical outcome in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the CAD group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the use of iAssist accelerometric CAD facilitates comparable good leg alignment after TKA in the frontal plane and more accurate tibial slope with fewer outliers in the sagittal plane compared with a conventional technique. Our operation time was longer with CAD.

No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Accurate implant position in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can potentially lead to better long-term functional outcomes and implant survival. Recent studies on whether better clinical results could be obtained from computer-navigated or conventional TKA were inconclusive. In addition, recent reviews only included short-term follow-up studies without performing quantitative mid- to long-term follow-up analysis. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing mid- to long-term clinical outcomes (such as knee scoring and functional results) and radiological outcomes (such as normal alignment of the limb axis or component) between computer-navigated TKA and conventional TKA to determine which method of TKA could obtain better clinical and radiological results.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and SCOPUS electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published through August 2018 that compared outcomes of computer-navigated TKA and conventional TKA. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical and radiological outcomes of both techniques were evaluated using various outcome measures.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials were included. Based on Knee Society Scores, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, pain, and range of motion, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two techniques. Based on outliers from the normal axis, outliers of femoral components in the coronal plane, and outliers of tibial components in the coronal plane, radiologic outcomes showed no significant differences between the two techniques either.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed that there were no significant differences in clinical or radiological outcomes between computer-navigated TKA and conventional TKA. It remains unclear which TKA technique yields better results in terms of mid- to long-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: Past, present and future

Computer technology is ubiquitous and relied upon in virtually all professional activities including neurosurgery, which is why it is surprising that it is not the case for orthopaedic surgery with fewer than 5% of surgeons using available computer technology in their procedures. In this review, we explore the evolution and background of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS), delving into the basic principles behind the technology and the changes in the discussion on the subject throughout the years and the impact these discussions had on the field. We found evidence that industry had an important role in driving the discussion at least in knee arthroplasty-a leading field of CAOS-with the ratio between patents and publications increased from approximately 1:10 in 2004 to almost 1:3 in 2014. The adoption of CAOS is largely restrained by economics and ergonomics with sceptics challenging the accuracy and precision of navigation during the early years of CAOS moving to patient functional improvements and long term survivorship. Nevertheless, the future of CAOS remains positive with the prospect of new technologies such as improvements in image-guided surgery, enhanced navigation systems, robotics and artificial intelligence.

Computer-Assisted Technologies in Arthroplasty: Navigating Your Way Today

Computer-assisted technologies that are used in arthroplasty include navigation, image-derived instrumentation (IDI), and robotics. Computer-assisted navigation improves accuracy and allows for real-time assessment of component positioning and soft-tissue tension. It is not clear whether the implementation of these technologies improves the clinical outcome of surgery. High cost and time demands have prevented the global implementation of computer-assisted technologies.

Comparison of iASSIST Navigation System with Conventional Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

The iASSIST navigation system is a handheld accelerometer‐based navigation system that has been applied in clinical practice in recent five years. This meta‐analysis aimed to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of iASSIST navigation with conventional surgical techniques for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare the surgery time between an iASSIST group and a conventional treatment group. This systematic review and meta‐analysis included all comparative prospective and retrospective studies published in Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science and the CNKI databases over the past 20 years. Inclusion criteria were studies that compared the iASSIST navigation system with conventional TKA. The primary outcomes were mechanical axis (MA) and outliers, which means postoperative MA varus or valgus of more than 3°. Secondary outcomes were coronal femoral angle (CFA) and coronal tibial angle (CTA). Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate functional outcome. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Eight studies involving 558 knees were included in this meta‐analysis. Of these, 275 patients used the iASSIST navigation system and 283 used conventional surgical techniques. A total of 5 studies were considered high quality and the other 3 were considered to be of moderate quality. The occurrence of malalignment of >3° in the iASSIST group was 13.3%, compared with 29.04% in the conventional group. Postoperative MA of the iASSIST group was significantly better than that of the conventional group (I² = 19%, OR = −0.92, 95% CI = −1.09 to −0.75, P < 0.00001). The iASSIST navigation system provided significantly increased accuracy in the coronal femoral angle (I² = 79%, OR = −0.88, 95% CI = −1.21 to −0.54, P < 0.00001) and the coronal tibial angle (I² = 34%, OR = 0.39, 95% CI = −0.48 to −0.30, P < 0.00001) compared with conventional techniques. However, the duration of surgery using the iASSIST procedure was longer and there was no significant difference in the short‐term KSS in the iASSIST group compared with the conventional group. We found that when pooling the data of included studies, the number of outliers was fewer in the iASSIST group, and compared with conventional TKA techniques, the iASSIST system significantly improved the accuracy of lower limb alignment but the duration of surgery was prolonged in addition to there being no apparent advantage in terms of short‐term functional score.

Technical and surgical causes of outliers after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty

Background

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves implant and limb alignment but outliers continue to exist. This study aimed to determine the technical and surgical causes of outliers.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 208 patients who had undergone navigated TKA. Limb and implant alignment indices were measured on post-operative CT scans: mechanical femoro-tibial angle (MFTA); coronal femoral angle (CFA); coronal tibial angle (CTA); sagittal femoral angle (SFA); and sagittal tibial angle (STA). Values outside 0°±3° for MFTA and SFA, 90°±3° for CFA, CTA and STA were considered outliers. Intra-operative navigation data and CT scans were evaluated to categorize the causes of sagittal and coronal plane outliers into hip centre error; ankle centre error; heterogeneous tibial cement mantle; malalignment accepted by surgeon; suboptimal knee balance; and no obvious explanation.

Results

Of the 1040 measurements (five per TKA), the overall incidence of outliers was 10.4% (n = 108). Femoral component outliers (CFA + SFA, n = 51) were all attributable to hip centre error. Tibial component outliers (CTA + STA, n = 43) were attributable to ankle centre error (n = 6), heterogeneous cement mantle (n = 20), malalignment accepted by the surgeon (n = 6) and no obvious cause (n = 11). MFTA outliers were attributable to hip centre error (n = 4) or suboptimal knee balance (n = 10).

Conclusions

Surgeon related errors can be minimized by a meticulous operative technique. These results indicate scope for additional technical improvement, especially in hip centre acquisition, which may further reduce the incidence of outliers.

Similar radiological results with accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Zimmer iASSIST system is an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that does not require the use of a large console for alignment feedback as required in computer-assisted surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the accelerometer-based system in component positioning and overall mechanical alignment.

METHODS

Two groups of 30 patients each with primary osteoarthritis underwent TKA using either conventional method or Zimmer iASSIST navigation in 2013 was retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender and age. A senior arthroplasty surgeon performed all the operation using the same surgical approach. Perioperative and post-operative regimens were the same. All patients had standardized radiographs performed post-operatively to determine the lower limb mechanical alignment and component placement.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups for age, BMI, gender, side of operated knee and preoperative mechanical axis ( p > 0.05). There was no difference in the proportion of outliers for mechanical axis ( p = 0.38), coronal femoral angle ( p = 0.50), coronal tibia angle ( p = 0.11), sagittal femoral angle ( p = 0.28) and sagittal tibia angle ( p = 0.33). The duration of surgery, post-operative drop in haemoglobin level and transfusion incidence did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our article showed that iASSIST was safe and remains a useful tool to restore mechanical axis. However, our data demonstrated no difference in lower limb alignment and component placement between the TKA that used accelerometer-based system and those that underwent conventional method.

Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation increases reproducibility compared to non-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotics navigation is a branch of computer navigation technology that might further improve accuracy of implant placement. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy achieved in TKA with a robotic navigation system.

METHODS

One hundred seventy three knees. System studied: Omni navigation System (OMNI, Raynham, MA). Navigated femoral and tibial cuts were compared to postoperative computed tomography (CT). Measurements reviewed: femoral coronal alignment (FCA), femoral sagittal alignment (FSA), femoral rotational alignment (FRA), tibial coronal alignment (TCA), tibial sagittal alignment (TSA) and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Statistical analysis was made using R.

RESULTS

The mean differences between the navigated reported and the CT positions were: FCA: 0.1 ± 1.2° more varus (P = 0.58), FSA: 1.5 ± 0.3° more flexed (P < 0.001), FRA: 0.0 ± 1.7° (P = 0.93), TCA: 0.7 ± 1.1° more varus (P < 0.001), TSA: -1.3 ± 1.5 more negative slope (P < 0.001), HKA angle: 0.4 ± 2.4 more varus (P < 0.049). The percentages of concordance inside a three degree difference were: FCA: 98% (169 knees), FSA: 100% (173 knees), FRA: 94% (162 knees), TCA: 99% (171 knees), TSA: 93% (161 knees) and HKA angle: 83% (144 knees).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the robotic navigation system studied is highly accurate regarding final implant positioning for FCA, FRA and TCA. It has less accuracy in FSA, TSA and the HKA angle.

Patient-Specific Surgical Guidance System for Intelligent Orthopaedics

Clinical benefits for image-guided orthopaedic surgical systems are often measured in improved accuracy and precision of tool trajectories, prosthesis component positions and/or reduction of revision rate. However, with an ever-increasing demand for orthopaedic procedures, especially joint replacements, the ability to increase the number of surgeries, as well as lowering the costs per surgery, is generating a similar interest in the evaluation of image-guided orthopaedic systems. Patient-specific instrument guidance has recently gained popularity in various orthopaedic applications. Studies have shown that these guides are comparable to traditional image-guided systems with respect to accuracy and precision of the navigation of tool trajectories and/or prosthesis component positioning. Additionally, reports have shown that these single-use instruments also improve operating room management and reduce surgical time and costs. In this chapter, we discuss how patient-specific instrument guidance provides benefits to patients as well as to the health-care community for various orthopaedic applications.

The Use of Navigation in Osteotomies Around the Knee

Osteotomies around the knee for treating osteoarthritis or knee instability are currently well-established procedures. Success of these realignment procedures is based on the accuracy and the reliability of correction angles in the coronal and sagittal alignment. In this context of improving precision and adapting the correction to each patient, navigation is currently being widely used. The rationale for its use is based on understanding the advantages and limitations, technical principles, and potential pitfalls. This article describes these areas and the overall clinical outcomes of this system for knee osteotomies.

Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: advantages, surgical procedure and review of the literature

Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most frequent orthopaedic procedures performed every year. At the same time 20% of patients who underwent TKR are not satisfied with the outcome. The reasons are unknown; we think that a mechanical alignment beyond 3° of varus-valgus can represent the most important cause of failure of TKR and consequently patient dissatisfaction. Materials and Methods: Neutral mechanical alignment is the main goal in every TKR: this can be achieved through different tools, such as extramedullary and intramedullary guides, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). The aim of this review is to compare the different alignment techniques in TKR, to describe CAS procedure and CAS results in recent literature. Results: Regarding the intramedullary guide, there is an increased risk of fatty embolism; there are great limitations on its use, or even impossibility, in cases of bone deformity and sequelae of trauma. Regarding the extramedullary guide, it becomes more difficult to use in cases of great obesity or increased soft-tissue volume around the tibia. PSI for TKR has been introduced to improve alignment, reduce outliers, operation time and the risk of fatty embolism by avoidance of intramedullary canal violation. Recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis proved no advantage of PSI in improving mechanical axis and implant survivorship. Discussion: CAS has provided to be a useful tool in assisting the surgeon to achieve more accurate post-operative mechanical axis through precise and reproducible bone cuts and ligament balancing. Two meta-analyses definitively proved that CAS technique improves mechanical axis and implant survivorship and one recent meta-analysis demonstrated that CAS provides better mechanical alignment and higher functional scores at short-term follow-up. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Comparison of Coronal Prosthetic Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using 3 Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems

Recent advances in surgical tools such as navigation systems have contributed to accurate implantation in total knee arthroplasty. Although several navigation systems have been developed, reports regarding which navigation system has better accuracy are few. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of postoperative coronal alignment among 3 navigation systems. A total of 90 knee prostheses were implanted for 90 patients with osteoarthritis. Thirty patients were enrolled in each of the following 3 navigation groups: Stryker Navigation System II (computed tomography-free navigation; Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey); OrthoPilot version 4.2 navigation system (computed tomography-free navigation; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany); and VectorVision navigation system (computed tomography-based navigation system; BrainLAB, Munich, Germany). Thirty consecutive total knee arthroplasties performed via the conventional method without navigation were selected as a control group for comparison with the navigation groups. Postoperative coronal mechanical axis and femoral and tibial coronal component angles were compared among the groups using long-leg standing radiographs for the rate of outliers beyond 3°. No differences were observed in the mean femoral and tibial component angles among the navigation and conventional groups. However, the proportion of outliers beyond 3° was higher in the conventional group than in the 3 navigation groups. No significant differences in the outlying values were found among the 3 navigation groups. These 3 navigation systems achieved equally accurate coronal mechanical alignment with fewer outliers. The navigation systems exhibited more precise implantation than the conventional method. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e621-e628.].

Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results

In this review, we outlined the definition of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee replacement (TKR) and described the different surgical approaches reported in the literature. Afterwards, we went through the most recent studies assessing MIS TKR. Next, we searched for potential limitations of MIS knee replacement and tried to answer the following questions: Are there selective criteria and specific patient selection for MIS knee surgery? If there are, then what are they? After all, a discussion and conclusion completed this article. There is certainly room for MIS or at least less invasive surgery for appropriate selected patients. Nonetheless, there are differences between approaches. Mini-medial parapatellar is easy to master, quick to perform and potentially extendable, whereas mini-subvastus and mini-midvastus are trickier and require more caution related to risk of haematoma and vastus medialis oblique (VMO) nerve damage. Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of mini-incision surgery for TKR does not appear fully adequate for the procedure to be used without special arrangements for consent and for audit or continuing research. There is an argument that a sudden jump from standard TKR to MIS TKR, especially without computer assistance such as navigation, patient-specific instrumentation or robotic, may breach a surgeon's duty of care towards patients because it exposes patients to unnecessary risks. As a final point, more evidence is required on the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure which will give objective shed light on real benefits of MIS TKR.

Navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study at three years follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Computer-assisted surgery application in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown more accurate implant alignment compared with conventional instrumentation and is associated with more homogeneous alignment results. Although longer implant survival and superior clinical outcomes should be expected from navigated TKA, currently available evidence does not support this hypothesis. The aim of this study was to compare navigated TKA with conventional TKA regarding clinical and radiological outcomes after a 3-year follow-up under the hypothesis that navigated TKA would provide better outcomes than conventional TKA.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In a prospective multicentre study, 119 patients underwent navigated TKA and 80 patients received conventional instrumentation. Patients were evaluated at the baseline and at postoperative months 3, 12, 24, and 36. Analysis included the American Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form-12 (SF12) Health Survey, and radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

All clinical scores improved significantly for all patients during the follow-up but were significantly better in the navigation group. The percentage of patients showing a mechanical axis between 3° of varus and 3° of valgus was significantly higher in the ATR group (93%) than in the conventional TKA group (71%) (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of computer-assisted surgery in TKA provides more accurate mechanical alignment and superior short-term functional outcomes compared to conventional TKA.

Predicted osteotomy planes are accurate when using patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers: a descriptive analysis

PURPOSE

Malalignment of implants is a major source of failure during total knee arthroplasty. To achieve more accurate 3D planning and execution of the osteotomy cuts during surgery, the Signature (Biomet, Warsaw) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was used to produce pin guides for the positioning of the osteotomy blocks by means of computer-aided manufacture based on CT scan images. The research question of this study is: what is the transfer accuracy of osteotomy planes predicted by the Signature PSI system for preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative block-guided pin placement to perform total knee arthroplasty procedures?

METHODS

The transfer accuracy achieved by using the Signature PSI system was evaluated by comparing the osteotomy planes predicted preoperatively with the osteotomy planes seen intraoperatively in human cadaveric legs. Outcomes were measured in terms of translational and rotational errors (varus, valgus, flexion, extension and axial rotation) for both tibia and femur osteotomies.

RESULTS

Average translational errors between the osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and the actual osteotomy planes achieved was 0.8 mm (± 0.5 mm) for the tibia and 0.7 mm (± 4.0 mm) for the femur. Average rotational errors in relation to predicted and achieved osteotomy planes were 0.1° (± 1.2°) of varus and 0.4° (± 1.7°) of anterior slope (extension) for the tibia, and 2.8° (± 2.0°) of varus and 0.9° (± 2.7°) of flexion and 1.4° (± 2.2°) of external rotation for the femur.

CONCLUSION

The similarity between osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and osteotomy planes actually achieved was excellent for the tibia although some discrepancies were seen for the femur. The use of 3D system techniques in TKA surgery can provide accurate intraoperative guidance, especially for patients with deformed bone, tailored to individual patients and ensure better placement of the implant.

Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The exact indication for a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains debated. Minimally invasive techniques have been developed to decrease the surgical trauma related to the prosthesis implantation, and this technique is well fitted to UKA. However, there are concerns about loss of accuracy with minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, rapid recovery techniques have been developed in order to reduce the length of hospital stay. Again, UKA is well fitted to these new developments of postoperative care. We combine routinely a minimal invasive operative technique with navigation assistance to ensure proper positioning of the implants as well as an optimal ligamentous balance. Instruments have been adapted for use with a typical 6-cm skin incision with little change from the conventional navigated operating technique. A multimodal pain treatment is implemented immediately after the implantation, with special attention to a routine saphenous nerve blockade. Patients are instructed to stand up on the day of surgery with full weight bearing and to mobilize the knee joint without restriction. They may be discharged at least on the day following surgery, and the most favorable patients may be operated in our day-case surgery unit. These conclusions should be confirmed on a larger scale.

Translatory hip kinematics measured with optoelectronic surgical navigation

PURPOSE

An optoelectronic surgical navigation system was used to detect small but measurable translational motion of human hip cadavers in high-range passive motions. Kinematic data were also examined to demonstrate the role of soft tissues in constraining hip translation.

METHODS

Twelve cadaver hips were scanned using CT, instrumented for navigation, and passively taken through motion assessment. Center of the femoral head was tracked in the acetabular coordinates. Maximum non-impinging translation of the femoral head for each specimen hip was reported. This was repeated for 5 tissue states: whole, exposed to the capsule, partially or fully incised capsule, resection of the ligamentum teres and labrectomy. Femoral motions were compared to the reported value for ideal ball and socket model.

RESULTS

Whole and exposed hips underwent maximal translations of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] mm, respectively. These translational motions were statistically significantly different from reported value for a purely spherical joint, [Formula: see text]. Further tissue removal almost always significantly increased maximum non-impingement translational motion with [Formula: see text].

CONCLUSION

We found subtle but definite translations in every cadaver hip. There was no consistent pattern of translation. It is possible to use the surgical navigation systems for the assessment of human hip kinematics intra-operatively and improve the treatment of total hip arthroplasty patients by the knowledge of the fact that their hips translate. Better procedure selection and implantation optimization may arise from improved understanding of the motion of this critically important human joint.

Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty: a real navigation to better results?

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

Computer assisted surgery in knee replacement is still in discussion, but majority of papers affirm an increase of the accuracy in alignment. Aim of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of mechanical axis, the posterior tibial slope and the femoral component rotation with navigation, x-ray and CT data.

METHODS

We have analysed 145 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2014. We have checked each patient at 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. During each visit, we did a clinical evaluation checking the ROM and a clinical score (KOOS). At 2 years, we did a CT evaluation and a plain x-ray evaluation.

RESULTS

125 patients have completed the follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 2,6 years. Both ROM and KOOS values increased during follow-up. About the mechanical axis, both x-ray and CT data showed a mean deviation <2° from the target. About posterior tibial slope and femoral component rotation, CT data showed a mean deviation of <3° from the target. Mean difference between navigation and CT data was <1°.

CONCLUSIONS

According to literature data, our data confirm that computer assisted surgery in knee replacement have a good accuracy of coronal alignment, rotational alignment and posterior tibial slope.

Value of the cumulative sum test for the assessment of a learning curve: Application to the introduction of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in an academic department

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to use the cumulative summation (CUSUM) test to assess the learning curve during the introduction of a new surgical technique (patient-specific instrumentation) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an academic department.

METHODS

The first 50TKAs operated on at an academic department using patient-specific templates (PSTs) were scheduled to enter the study. All patients had a preoperative computed tomography scan evaluation to plan bone resections. The PSTs were positioned intraoperatively according to the best-fit technique and their three-dimensional orientation was recorded by a navigation system. The position of the femur and tibia PST was compared to the planned position for four items for each component: coronal and sagittal orientation, medial and lateral height of resection. Items were summarized to obtain knee, femur and tibia PST scores, respectively. These scores were plotted according to chronological order and included in a CUSUM analysis. The tested hypothesis was that the PST process for TKA was immediately under control after its introduction.

RESULTS

CUSUM test showed that positioning of the PST significantly differed from the target throughout the study. There was a significant difference between all scores and the maximal score. No case obtained the maximal score of eight points. The study was interrupted after 20 cases because of this negative evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The CUSUM test is effective in monitoring the learning curve when introducing a new surgical procedure. Introducing PST for TKA in an academic department may be associated with a long-lasting learning curve. The study was registered on the clinical.gov website (Identifier NCT02429245).

Experience of total knee arthroplasty using a novel navigation system within the surgical field

BACKGROUND

With the aim of improving component alignment and outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), several computer-assisted devices (CAD) have been developed.

METHODS

In February 2014, the present unit started to use a new imageless navigation system with accelerometric pods within the surgical field for all primary TKAs; there was no need for optical trackers or cameras. This paper presents the results of the first 72 TKAs using this iAssist system in 71 prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed patients. It analyzed component positioning in standard and full-length leg x-rays.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 70years (range 52-88). The center of hip, knee and ankle (mechanical axes) deviated on average 0.5° (standard deviation (SD) of 1.8) valgus from the targeted straight alignment. Three TKAs had >3° deviation (i.e. four degree varus, five degree and seven degree valgus). The frontal tibial tray alignment was an average of 89.9° (range 86.4-100.1°, SD ±2.0) with the target being 90°, and the sagittal slope was as targeted at 85.0° (range 78.4-88.8°, SD ±1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This CAD facilitated good mechanical alignment and reproducible accuracy in component positioning. Pods clipped onto cutting jigs within the surgical field provided simple and accurate navigation, with little extra time needed for calibration and no need for optical trackers or pre-operative imaging.

Experimental validation of the GNRB® for measuring anterior tibial translation

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to validate the technique used to measure anterior tibial translation in cadaver knees using the GNRB^® device by comparing it with the gold standard, the OrthoPilot^® navigation system.

HYPOTHESIS

Simultaneous measurement of anterior tibial translation by the GNRB^® and the OrthoPilot^® in the chosen experimental conditions will result in significant differences between devices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five fresh frozen cadavers were used. The knee was placed in 20° flexion. Four calibrated posterior-anterior forces (134N to 250N) were applied. For each applied force, the anterior tibial translation was measured simultaneously by both devices. Two conditions were analyzed: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) intact and ACL transected. The primary criterion was anterior tibial translation at 250N. The measurements were compared using a paired Student's t-test and the correlation coefficient was calculated. Agreement between the two methods was determined using Bland-Altman plots. Consistency of the measurements was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

For all applied forces and ligament conditions, the mean difference between the GNRB^® and the navigation system was 0.1±1.7mm (n.s). Out of the 80 measurements taken, the difference between devices was less than ±2mm in 66 cases (82%). There was a strong correlation, good agreement and high consistency between the two measurement methods.

DISCUSSION

The differences between the measurements taken by the GNRB^® and the navigation system were small and likely have no clinical impact. We recommend using the GNRB^® to evaluate anterior knee laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II controlled laboratory study.

Current state of the art in total knee arthroplasty computer navigation

PURPOSE

Computer-assisted surgery in orthopaedics is passing through the initial adapter phase of technology adoption. It started more than 20 years ago, but the uptake of technology is still not widespread. The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to the basic technology and familiarize with the terminology used in the computer navigation.

METHODS

During this time, the technology has matured and we have the evidence to prove its benefits for patients. Not only does it help placing the prosthetic components in correct orientation, it also helps with other parameters like blood loss and fat embolism reduction. In addition to being a teaching and training tool, it has also opened new areas of research which now question the traditional practices. Since it is not in commonly used, the basic aspects of computer navigation are not very well known.

RESULTS

This paper outlines some important definitions and restates the classification of navigation within the spectrum of computer-assisted technologies; it then elaborates on the key principles behind navigation in knee arthroplasty and goes through some of the differences between navigation systems. Finally, it describes in some detail the surgical steps with an image-free knee navigation system.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-assisted navigation is not mainstream yet, but this article should help readers unfamiliar with the technology to understand the basic terms and how it actually works.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty-do navigation or customized implants have a role?

Modern total knee arthroplasty is effective at treating the pain and disability associated with osteoarthritis. The number of total knee replacements done in the USA continues to increase. Despite the great care taken during all of these procedures, some patients remain dissatisfied with their outcome. While this dissatisfaction is likely multifactorial, malalignment of the prosthetic components is a major cause of postoperative complications. A neutral mechanical axis plus or minus 3° is felt to have a positive impact on the survivorship of the prosthesis. Conventional instrumentation has been shown to have a significant number of total knee replacements that lie well outside a neutral coronal alignment. With that in mind, significant effort has been placed into the development of technology to improve the overall alignment of the prosthesis. In order to reduce the number of outliers, several companies have developed cost-effective systems to aid the surgeon in achieving a more predictably aligned prosthesis in all three planes. We will review the literature that is available regarding several of these tools to examine if navigation or custom guides improve outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. Our review supports that while both navigation and custom implants guides seem to be a cost effective way to achieve a predictable mechanical alignment of a total knee prosthesis therefore reducing the number of outliers, the cost may be increased operative times with no perceived difference in patient satisfaction with navigation custom guides.

Optimal Number of Fixation Pins for Dedicated Mini Jig Cutting Guides During Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The optimal number of fixation pins for minimally invasive cutting guides in computer-navigated arthroplasty has not been determined. The authors hypothesized that more fixation pins will lead to greater mechanical stability and more accurate resections.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

12 bovine knee joints were divided into three groups with differing numbers of fixation pins. The ASM [Stryker] knee navigation system was utilized to perform resections, and accuracy of alignment and posterior slope was measured. Comparison was performed between the groups to calculate average differences between predicted and actual resection with differing number of pins.

RESULTS

The difference between actual and predicted values showed a trend toward diminishing with a greater number of fixation pins. The mean difference in coronal alignment of predicted versus actual resection was 0.75° for two fixation pins, 0.5° for three pins and 1° for four fixation pins. Similarly, the difference between posterior slope was 2.75°, 2°, and 1°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a trend toward greater accuracy of resections with more fixation pins. Further investigation may be beneficial.

Establishing a Customized Guide Plate for Osteotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Lower-extremity X-ray and Knee Computed Tomography Images

BACKGROUND

The conventional method cannot guarantee the precise osteotomies required for a perfect realignment and a better prognosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study investigated a customized guide plate for osteotomy placement in TKAs with the aid of the statistical shape model technique using weight-bearing lower-extremity X-rays and computed tomography (CT) images of the knee.

METHODS

From October 2014 to June 2015, 42 patients who underwent a TKA in Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital were divided into a guide plate group (GPG, 21 cases) and a traditional surgery group (TSG, 21 cases) using a random number table method. In the GPG group, a guide plate was designed and printed using preoperative three-dimensional measurements to plan and digitally simulate the operation. TSG cases were treated with the conventional method. Outcomes were obtained from the postoperative image examination and short-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Operative time was 49.0 ± 10.5 min for GPG, and 62.0 ± 9.7 min in TSG. The coronal femoral angle, coronal tibial angle, posterior tibial slope, and the angle between the posterior condylar osteotomy surface and the surgical transepicondylar axis were 89.2 ± 1.7°, 89.0 ± 1.1°, 6.6 ± 1.4°, and 0.9 ± 0.3° in GPG, and 86.7 ± 2.9°, 87.6 ± 2.1°, 8.9 ± 2.8°, and 1.7 ± 0.8° in TSG, respectively. The Hospital for Special Surgery scores 3 months after surgery were 83.7 ± 18.4 in GPG and 71.5 ± 15.2 in TSG. Statistically significant differences were found between GPG and TSG in all measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

A customized guide plate to create an accurate osteotomy in TKAs may be created using lower-extremity X-ray and knee CT images. This allows for shorter operative times and better postoperative alignment than the traditional surgery. Application of the digital guide plate may also result in better short-term outcomes.

Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery: Current State and Future Perspective

Introduced about two decades ago, computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) has emerged as a new and independent area, due to the importance of treatment of musculoskeletal diseases in orthopedics and traumatology, increasing availability of different imaging modalities, and advances in analytics and navigation tools. The aim of this paper is to present the basic elements of CAOS devices and to review state-of-the-art examples of different imaging modalities used to create the virtual representations, of different position tracking devices for navigation systems, of different surgical robots, of different methods for registration and referencing, and of CAOS modules that have been realized for different surgical procedures. Future perspectives will also be outlined.

Radiological outcomes of pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of pinless navigation (BrainLAB(®) VectorVision(®) Knee 2.5 Navigation System) as an intra-operative alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors hypothesized that pinless navigation would reduce the proportion of outliers in conventional TKA, without a significant increase in the duration of surgery.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2012, 100 patients scheduled for a unilateral primary TKA were randomized into two groups: pinless navigation and conventional surgery. All TKAs were performed with the surgical aim of achieving neutral coronal alignment with a 180° mechanical axis. The primary outcomes of this study were post-operative radiographic assessment of lower limb alignment using hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and components placement using coronal femoral-component angle (CFA) and coronal tibia-component angle (CTA).

RESULTS

There was a smaller proportion of outliers for HKA, CFA and CTA at 10, 2 and 2 % respectively, in the pinless navigation group, compared to 32, 16 and 16 %, respectively, in the conventional group (p = 0.013, p = 0.032 and p = 0.032, respectively). The mean CFA was also more accurate at 90° in the pinless navigation group compared to 91° in the conventional group (p = 0.002). There was no difference in the duration of surgery between the two groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Pinless navigation improves lower limb alignment and components placement without a significant increase in the duration of surgery. The authors recommend the use of pinless navigation to verify the coronal alignments of conventional cutting blocks in TKA before the bone cuts are made.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The objective of this study was to determine whether computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves functional outcomes and implant survivability using data from a large national database. We analysed 9054 primary TKA procedures performed between 2006 and 2012 from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. Functional outcomes were assessed using Oxford Knee Questionnaires at six months and five years. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in mean Oxford Knee Scores between the navigated and non-navigated groups at six months (39.0 vs 38.1, P=0.54) or five years (42.2 vs 42.0, P=0.76). At current follow-up, there was no difference in revision rates between navigated and non-navigated TKA (0.46 vs 0.43 revisions 100 component years, P=0.8).

Agreement between radiological and computer navigation measurement of lower limb alignment

PURPOSE

Accurate and reproducible measurements of limb alignment are necessary for planning, performing and evaluation of reconstructive knee surgery. Aim of this study was the comparison of the alignment measured on long-leg standing radiographs with the intraoperative data from a navigation system.

METHODS

The records of 135 consecutive patients who received computer-assisted TKA were examined. Technical quality of the long-leg radiographs (LLRs) was classified good, acceptable or poor according to the rotation of the leg. The difference between radiographic and navigation measurements of leg alignment was assessed.

RESULTS

Preoperative LLRs were rated as good 56.3% (71.1% postoperatively), acceptable in 37.0% (20.0% postoperatively) and poor in 6.7% (8.9% postoperatively). The median difference between radiographic and navigation measurements increased with reduced quality of the LLR [good 1.5° (range 0.0°-9.9°), acceptable 2.5° (range 0.0°-15.0°), poor 4.5° (range 0.2°-9.5°)], but not with greater deformity. Median difference between both measurements in good radiographs was 1.7° (range 0.0°-9.9°) preoperatively and 1.2° (range 0.0°-7.0°) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Difference between radiographic and navigation measurements of lower limb alignment is low if the LLR are obtained in neutral rotation. Larger differences between both measurements can occur even under these ideal conditions, and it is still unclear which measurement is closer to reality. Therefore, even if a navigation system is used during surgery, long-leg standing radiographs should currently not be abandoned.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.