Patellar component resection in revision and reimplantation total knee arthroplasty

A Crossed Screw Patellar Reconstruction Technique for the Treatment of the Severely Deficient Scaphoid Shaped Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty

One of the contraindications to patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty is a thin and severely eroded 'deficient' patella. However, such patients often present with severe patellofemoral joint arthritis, patellar lateral subluxation, and patella maltracking, which can only be treated effectively with resurfacing. While various treatments have been proposed, options remain limited. Here we introduce a method of patella reconstruction using four 2.7-mm titanium cortical screws crossing each other into the inner shell of the patella. This provides a scaffold onto which bone cement and any standard polyethylene patellar component can be fixed. Postoperatively, the patient had no anterior knee pain, no patella maltracking, and no component loosening. Advantages of this technique include minimization of extensor disruption, low costs, easy accessibility, reproducibility, and improved mechanical strength.

Classification and Management of Periprosthetic Patella Fractures

Complications related to the extensor mechanism and patellofemoral joint continue to be the most common cause of pain and indication for surgical revision following total knee arthroplasty. Numerous risk factors related to the patient, implant, and technical performance of the procedure have been identified. The Ortiguera and Berry classification system is widely used for the systematic classification and management of these fractures. Because of the difficult nature of revision surgery for fracture and the high risk of complication, a careful assessment of the fracture and implants is vital to determining the best course of treatment.

Comparison of risk for postoperative hyperextension between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of postoperative hyperextension and factors affecting hyperextension needs to be investigated separately for cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), because the mechanism for preventing hyperextension is different according to the bearing design. The purpose of the study was to compare the incidence of postoperative hyperextension between CR and PS TKAs and analyze the factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension.

METHODS

Matched 213 CR and PS TKAs with Persona^® prosthesis were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative demographics, clinical and radiographic knee condition, and pelvic incidence were similar between groups. Appropriate knee extension (0°-5°), confirmed with a goniometer, was achieved intraoperatively. The knee sagittal angle was radiographically measured preoperatively and at 2 years postoperative. The incidence of hyperextension (sagittal angle < - 5°) was investigated. The factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension were analyzed in terms of age, sex, preoperative mechanical axis, knee sagittal angle, postoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS), change of posterior femoral offset, and pelvic incidence.

RESULTS

The knee sagittal angle was not significantly different preoperatively between CR and PS TKAs. The postoperative knee sagittal angle was 2.9° in CR TKAs and 4.4° in PS TKAs (p = 0.004). The incidence of postoperative hyperextension was 11.7% (25/213) in CR TKAs and 4.2% (9/213) in PS TKAs (p = 0.007). The preoperative sagittal angle, postoperative PTS, and pelvic incidence were the significant factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension in CR TKAs (odds ratio 0.869, 2.205, and 1.045, respectively); the preoperative sagittal angle was only the significant factor in PS TKAs (odds ratio 0.857) CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative knee hyperextension occurred more frequently and was affected by more factors in CR TKAs than PS TKAs. Efforts to avoid hyperextension and closed observation are required in TKAs performed in patients with the risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Biconvex Patellar Components: 96% Durability at 10 Years in 262 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy to address osseous deficiencies of the patella during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. One possible solution is a cemented biconvex patellar component used such that the non-articular convexity both improves fixation and makes up for bone loss. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of the use of biconvex patellar components in a large series of revision TKAs.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2014, 262 revision TKAs were performed at a single institution using a biconvex patellar component. Implant survivorship, clinical and radiographic results, and complications were assessed. The mean patient age at the TKA revision was 69 years, and 53% of the patients were female. The mean follow-up was 7 years.

RESULTS

The 10-year survivorship free of revision of the biconvex patellar component due to aseptic loosening was 96%. The 10-year survivorship free of any revision of the biconvex patellar component was 87%. The 10-year survivorship free of any rerevision and free of any reoperation was 75% and 70%, respectively. The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) improved from 45.4 before the index revision to 67.7 after it. The mean residual composite thickness seen on the most recent radiographs was 18.1 mm. In addition to the complications leading to revision, the most common complications were periprosthetic patellar fracture (6%), of which 3 required revision; superficial wound infection (6%) requiring antibiotic therapy only or irrigation and debridement; and arthrofibrosis (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of 262 revision TKAs, biconvex patellar components used to treat marked patellar bone loss demonstrated excellent durability with a 10-year survivorship free of patellar rerevision due to aseptic loosening of 96%. The biconvex patellar components were reliable as evidenced by substantial improvements in clinical outcomes scores and a low risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patellar Rebar Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In revision total knee arthroplasty, osteolysis, mechanical abrasion, and infection may leave patellar bone stock severely attenuated with cavitary and/or segmental rim deficiencies that compromise fixation of patellar implant pegs. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the use of cortical "rebar" screws to augment cement fixation in revision patelloplasty.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2018, dorsal patellar rebar technique was used for patellar reconstruction in 128 of 1037 revision total knee arthroplasty cases (12.3%). Follow-up was achieved with serial radiographs and prospective comparison of Knee Society Scores (KSSs) for clinical outcome. Complications and implant failures requiring reoperation or modified rehabilitation were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 128 patellar revisions performed using the rebar technique, 69 patients were women and 59 patients were men. The average age of the group was 69.5 years (range, 32-83 years). The mean follow-up of the cohort was 37 months (range, 13-109 months). The most common causes for revision were kinematic conflict, periprosthetic joint infection, and aseptic loosening. The median number of rebar screws used was 5 (range, 1-13). Preoperative KSSs for the study cohort averaged 50 (range, 0-90) At latest follow-up, mean KSS was 85 (range, 54-100). There were 4 patellar-related complications (3.1%) with no implant failures at study conclusion. Retrieval analysis revealed rigid fixation of the reconstructed patellar component in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar rebar screw augmentation is a useful technique when there are significant cavitary deficiencies and limited segmental rim deficiencies. This technique allows the surgeon to extend indications for patellar revision arthroplasty.

Short-Term Follow-Up of Patellar Component Revision in Patients With Isolated Patellar Component Loosening

BACKGROUND

The etiology of patellar component loosening can be multifactorial, including component malposition, trauma, infection, and poor implant design. These cases may be managed with isolated patellar component revision or simultaneous patellar component with femoral and/or tibial component revision. Isolated patellar revision in the setting of aseptic loosening historically has had limited success with high rates of repeat revision.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 75 cases diagnosed with patellar component loosening that underwent revision. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Cases were categorized as either isolated patellar (IP) revision or patellar with femoral and/or tibial component (P + O) revisions. Survivorship and re-revision causes were compared between groups. Secondary outcomes included surgical time, estimated blood loss, range of motion, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent IP revision, and 25 patients had P + O revision. Overall survivorship at the 2-year follow-up interval was 94.6%. Survivorship of IP revision undertaken for aseptic loosening was 94%. Survivorship of P + O revision was 96%. Eight percent of patients required reoperation from the P + O revision group, while 12% of patients in the IP revision group underwent a reoperation. Patients undergoing IP revision had better postoperative range of motion, lower surgical times, lower estimated blood loss, and decreased length of stay.

CONCLUSION

IP revision demonstrates excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes comparable to P + O revision. When appropriate, IP revision should be considered as a potential treatment option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Long-Term Results of Patellar Bone-Grafting for Severe Patellar Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on managing severe patellar bone loss after total knee arthroplasty. We previously described an initial series involving a novel technique of patellar bone-grafting with a short follow-up. The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survivorship and the radiographic and clinical results of patellar bone-grafting during revision total knee arthroplasty in a larger series with an extended follow-up.

METHODS

We identified 90 patients from a single institution who underwent 93 patellar bone-grafting procedures for severe patellar bone loss from 1997 to 2014. The mean age of the patients was 70 years, and 46% of patients were female. Forty-five knees (48%) underwent first-time revisions, and 19 knees (20%) had undergone a failed attempt at patellar resurfacings. Intraoperative patellar caliper thickness increased from a mean of 7 to 25 mm after patellar bone-grafting (p < 0.01). Radiographic review determined changes in patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. Knee Society scores (KSSs) were calculated. The mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18 years). Kaplan-Meier methods determined survivorship free of any revision and any reoperation. Cox proportional hazards analysis determined predictive factors for failure.

RESULTS

Survivorship free of patellar revision was 96% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any revision was 84% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any reoperation was 78% at 10 years. Increasing patient age was the only protective factor against further patellar revision (hazard ratio, 0.95; p < 0.01). When comparing initial radiographs with final radiographs, patellar height decreased from 22 to 19 mm (p < 0.01), 80% compared with 59% of patellae articulated centrally in the trochlea (p = 0.01), and 32% compared with 77% had remodeling over the lateral femoral condyle (p < 0.01). Anterior knee pain decreased from 51% to 27% postoperatively (p = 0.01). The mean knee flexion improved from 101° to 108° (p = 0.03). The mean KSS improved from 50 to 85 points (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable long-term clinical results can be expected with patellar bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Pain, range of motion, and other reported outcomes improve despite radiographic changes to patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. This technique is a durable and reliable option when standard patellar resurfacing is not possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A classification-based approach to the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty

Background

There is a paucity of data to guide management of the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this study was to review our experience with patellar management in RTKA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 422 consecutive RTKAs at a minimum of 2 years (mean, 42 months). Patellar management was guided by a classification that considered stability, size, and position of the implanted patellar component, thickness/quality of remaining bone stock, and extensor mechanism competence.

Results

Management in 304 aseptic revisions included retention of a well-fixed component in 212 (69.7%) and revision using an all-polyethylene component in 46 (15.1%). Patella-related complications included 5 extensor mechanism ruptures (1.6%), 3 cases of patellar maltracking (1.0%), and 2 periprosthetic patellar fractures (0.7%). Of 118 2-stage revisions for infection, an all-polyethylene component was used in 88 (74.6%), patelloplasty in 20 (16.9%), and patellectomy in 7 (5.9%). Patella-related complications included 4 cases of patellar maltracking (3.4%), 3 extensor mechanism ruptures (2.5%), and 1 periprosthetic patellar fracture (0.8%).

Conclusions

Septic revisions required concomitant lateral releases more frequently (38.1% vs 10.9%; P < .02) but had a similar rate of patellar complications (6.8% vs 3.3%; P = .40). No cases required rerevision specifically for failure of the patellar component. Patients who had a patelloplasty had worse postoperative Knee Society functional scores than those with a retained or revised patellar component. In most aseptic RTKAs, a well-fixed patellar component can be retained. If revision is required, a standard polyethylene component is sufficient in most septic and aseptic revisions. Rerevisions related to the patellar component are infrequent.

Achilles tendon allograft for augmentation of the Hanssen patellar bone grafting

PURPOSE

Severe patellar bone loss precludes the insertion of another patellar implant in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and weakens the attachment of the patella to the quadriceps tendon. Hanssen described securing a tissue flap to the patellar rim allows the delivery of cancellous bone graft into the patellar bone defect. The purpose of this study is to describe the surgical technique and early clinical results of a modified Hanssen patelloplasty with an Achilles tendon allograft.

METHODS

The modified technique described in three patients undergoing revision TKA aims to augment the extensor mechanism by securing an Achilles tendon allograft to the proximal part of the patellar tendon and the distal quadriceps tendon using mattress sutures. This serves to reinforce the extensor mechanism and decrease the risk of a tear of its patellar attachment. The patellar bone defect is grafted using corticocancellous bone chips.

RESULTS

Over a 12- to 48-month follow-up, all reconstructions healed with an increase in patellar bone thickness. No patient had any extensor lag, and all patients achieved 110°-125° of flexion. The Western Ontario and McMaster University knee scores improved from 53 (23-88) preoperatively to 88.5 (66-100) at last follow-up, with no reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of the extensor mechanism with an Achilles tendon allows for early mobilization and excellent postoperative range of motion in patients with large patella bone defects and imminent patella fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Reconstruction of a deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty: results of a new surgical technique using transcortical wiring

This study aimed to report the results of a novel surgical technique for the reconstruction of a deficient patella during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty-eight patients (30 knees) with a deficient patella were treated with an onlay-type prosthesis and bone-augmenting procedure, using acrylic bone cement and transcortical wiring. The technique was indicated when the thickness of remnant patella was less than 8mm with variable amounts of the peripheral rim. Mean follow-up period was 36.6months (range, 24 to 55months).The respective mean Knee Society scores for knee and function improved from 34.2 and 23 points, preoperatively to 73.5 and 61 points, at final follow-up. One patient experienced patellar fracture 1week after surgery. There were no complications associated with implanted hardware.

Minimum 6-year follow-up of revision total knee arthroplasty without patella reimplantation

Management options for the polyethylene patellar button during a revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include retention, revision, or removal of the button without replacement (patelloplasty). Our purpose was to determine the midterm outcome of patients undergoing revision TKA with patelloplasty. We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon's database for patients undergoing such surgery from May 2001 to June 2005 and identified 33 (34 knees). The 25 patients (26 knees) who had at least 6 years' follow-up formed our study group. We compared preoperative and final follow-up Knee Society Scores and radiographs. Mean Knee Society Scores had increased from 50 (range, 23-88) to 93 (range, 41-100), respectively. No patient required additional surgery. We conclude that, at midterm follow-up, patelloplasty appears to be a satisfactory option in the management of the patella in revision TKA.

Recent advances and developments in knee surgery: principles of periprosthetic knee fracture management

The management of distal femoral, tibial and patellar fractures after total knee arthroplasty can be complex. The incidence of these fractures is increasing as the number of total knee arthroplasties being performed and patient longevity is increasing. There is a wide range of treatment options including revision arthroplasty for loose implants. This review article discusses the epidemiology, risk factors, classification and treatment of these fractures.

Porous tantalum patellar components in revision total knee arthroplasty minimum 5-year follow-up

Revision total knee arthroplasty can be complicated by severe patellar bone loss, precluding the use of standard cemented patellar components. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes of porous tantalum (PT) patellar components. Twenty-three PT components were used in 6 men and 17 women (average age, 62 years). All patellae had less than 10-mm residual thickness. The PT shell was secured to host bone, and a 3-peg polyethylene component was cemented onto the shell. In 2 patients, the PT component was sutured directly to extensor mechanism. Average follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 5-10 years). At follow-up, the Knee Society scores for pain and function averaged 82.7 and 33.3, respectively, whereas the mean Oxford knee score was 32.6. Four patients underwent revision surgery. Survivorship was 19 (83%) of 23 patients. Porous tantalum patellar components can provide fixation where severe bone loss precludes the use of traditional implants. Failures were associated with avascular residual bone and fixation of components to the extensor mechanism.

Patellar management in revision total knee arthroplasty: is patellar resurfacing a better option?

The management of the patella during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on the indication for revision, the type and stability of the patellar component in place, and availability of bone stock. We prospectively compared the clinical outcome and satisfaction rates in revision TKA patients managed with patellar resurfacing (n = 13, group I) to retention of the patellar component (n = 22, group II) or patelloplasty (n = 11, group III) at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were no differences in the improvement of Knee Society Scores, Short-Form 36 Scores, and satisfaction rates between the groups. There were no revision surgeries for patellar component failure or patellar fractures. Satisfactory results can be achieved using a variety of methods of patellar management in revision TKA by individualizing the treatment modality depending on the clinical scenario.

Gull-wing osteotomy for the treatment of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty

Reconstruction of the deficient patella remains a challenge in revision total knee arthroplasty. Twelve consecutive patients who had a knee revision in which a nonresurfacable patella was treated with a gull-wing patellar osteotomy were followed using a computerized database. Radiographs revealed successful healing of the osteotomy in all patients with central tracking of the patella in the trochlear groove. There was a significant improvement in the range of motion and Knee Society scores. There were no patellar fractures or significant patellar malalignment in this series. This technique has shown promising results for the treatment of the nonresurfacable patella during revision total knee arthroplasty, and we conclude that it is a viable method of patellar salvage reserved for the most advanced cases of patellar bone stock compromise.

How to address the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty

Patellar issues need to be carefully addressed during any revision TKA and the surgeon often faces the question of what to do with the patella at the time of revision. The choice of treatment is often made by balancing what is technically feasible with the risk of potential complications and takes into account the reason for the revision, the type of implant (i.e., metal-backing or all-polyethylene), the duration of implantation, the fixation, the stability, the sterilization technique, the wear, the presence of osteolysis, the compatibility with the femoral component, and most importantly the remaining bone stock. The various treatment options then include retention of the patellar component, revision of the patellar component, removal of the component with retention of the patellar bony shell (patelloplasty or resection arthroplasty), excision of the patella (partial or total patellectomy), secondary resurfacing, and reconstruction/augmentation of the patellar bone stock. Isolated patellar revision is associated with a high complication rate and recurrent failure when poor patellar tracking, incongruent designs and malalignment of the femoral and tibial components exist. Retention of a well-fixed all-PE (non-oxidized) patella is advocated where possible and revision of metal-backed patella is recommended (unless well fixed with poor bone stock). In the situation of a deficient patella, patelloplasty, augmentation procedures and very rarely patellectomy are other viable options.

Trabecular metal patella in total knee arthroplasty with patella bone deficiency

This study evaluates results following patellar resurfacing using trabecular metal (TM) patella in marked deficiency or weakness of patellar bone that precludes patellar resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. Ten consecutive patients undergoing primary (3 cases) or revision (7 cases) total knee arthroplasty with patella augmentation were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 45 months (range 18-65). Nine patients had marked patellar bone deficiency and one had had previous patellectomy. No intra-operative complications occurred. There was no displacement of the patellar component and no patellar fractures when at least 50% of bone contact was possible. We observed loosening of the patella augmentation 17 months after the index procedure only in the case of previous patellectomy. When bone was present the fixation appeared excellent by radiographic evaluation already at 3 to 6 months after surgery; afterward bone contact was uniform in the peripheral regions in both lateral and Merchant radiographic views without signs of loosening. Finally, the mean Knee Society scores improved in all patients.

The effect of an augmentation patella prosthesis versus patelloplasty on revision patellar kinematics and quadriceps tendon force: an ex vivo study

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 2 revision reconstructive interventions on patellofemoral joint mechanics in comparison to control. We flexed 8 cadaver knee specimens from 0 degrees to 60 degrees of flexion in a test rig designed to simulate weight-bearing flexion and extension (Oxford rig). Quadriceps tendon extensor force and patellar kinematics were recorded for control total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (normal primary TKA with patella resurfaced) and then for each of the 2 revision patellar interventions (after patelloplasty of typical revision knee patellar bone defect to leave a simple bony shell, and after TKA with augmentation patella resurfacing). Our results demonstrate that patellar kinematics and quadriceps extensor force are optimized when the patella is reconstructed to normal anteroposterior thickness.

Management of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty

There are a number of options available to manage the patella when revising a failed total knee arthroplasty. If the previous patellar component is well-fixed, undamaged, not worn, and compatible with the femoral revision component, then it can be retained. When a patellar component necessitates revision and is removed with adequate remaining patellar bone stock, an onlay-type all-polyethylene cemented implant can be used. Management of the patella with severe bony deficiency remains controversial. Treatment options for the severely deficient patella include the use of a cemented all-polyethylene biconvex patellar prosthesis, patellar bone grafting and augmentation, patellar resection arthroplasty (patelloplasty), performing a gull-wing osteotomy, patellectomy, or the use of newer technology such as a tantalum (trabecular metal) patellar prosthesis. Severe patellar bone deficiency is a challenging situation because restoration of the extensor mechanism, proper patellar tracking, and satisfactory anatomic relationships with the femoral and tibial components are critical for an optimal clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Periprosthetic knee fractures

Fractures of the distal femur, proximal tibia, and patella that occur adjacent to a total knee replacement may be very difficult to treat. Fixation options are compromised because of the short articular segment, frequent comminution, pre-existing osteoporosis, previous surgical incisions, and the presence of the knee implant itself. This review article summarizes current concepts regarding the incidence, classification, treatment options, and outcomes for periprosthetic fractures of the knee.

Effect of retaining a patellar prosthesis on pain, functional, and satisfaction outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty

It remains controversial whether patients' pain, function, and satisfaction are affected in revision total knee arthroplasty by patellar prosthetic resurfacing. This is a retrospective, comparative cohort study to evaluate this. One hundred twenty-six patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty revision were identified. After revision, the presence or absence of a patellar prosthesis was ascertained. At a minimum of 2 years' follow-up, pain and function were assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oxford-12, Short-Form 12, and patient satisfaction questionnaires in 110 patients (58 with patellar component, 52 bony shell). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 cohorts for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain, function, Oxford-12, and satisfaction outcomes. The absence of a patellar prosthesis does not appear to significantly affect pain, function, or satisfaction outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Porous tantalum patellar augmentation: the importance of residual bone stock

Trabecular metal augmentation of bone defects has been associated with favorable bone ingrowth. Animal studies also suggest fibrous tissue attachment to trabecular metal can be achieved. We treated 16 patients with total knee arthroplasty (18 knees) with severe patellar bone loss using trabecular metal patellar reconstruction. The patients were divided into two groups based on the amount of residual patellar bone stock present at the time of surgery: Group 1 (six patients, seven knees) with no patellar bone stock and Group 2 (10 patients, 11 knees) in whom at least 50% of the patellar component surface was covered by host bone. All seven patellar components in Group 1 loosened within 1 year. Two of these developed necrosis of the extensor mechanism leading to extensor mechanism discontinuity. One component in Group 2 became infected and loosened, whereas the remaining 10 components remained stable at minimum 12-month followup. Our results suggest stable fixation of a trabecular metal patellar component can be achieved when residual bone is present for implant fixation, but early loosening is likely to occur when soft tissue is used for fixation to the implant.

Periprosthetic patellar fractures

Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty is a rare yet challenging complication. Patellar fracture can occur as a result of trauma or it may be atraumatic. A multitude of factors can lead to periprosthetic patellar fracture including patient related factors, surgical technique related factors, and implant specific factors. Understanding the etiologic factors leading to atraumatic patellar fractures could result in minimizing complications. We present the results of peri-prosthetic patellar fractures in 12 patients. All type I non-displaced fractures (7 cases) were treated nonoperatively. Surgical treatment was selected for the remaining 5 cases which included resection arthroplasty combined with open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture (3 knees), partial patellectomy (1 knee), and total patellectomy (1 knee). The outcome was excellent in 1 knee, good in 8 knees, and fair in the remaining 3 knees at the latest follow-up. There were 2 reoperations; 1 for disruption of the extensor mechanism and 1 for refracture. One patient developed a superficial wound infection. We reviewed the available literature regarding the etiology, surgical strategies, and outcomes for periprosthetic patellar fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic studies, level IV (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision of the patella with deficient bone using a biconvex component

Revision surgery on a failed patellar component can be difficult because of deficient residual bone that may compromise the functional outcome of the revision. We reviewed 20 knees in 20 patients in whom the residual patellar bone was less than 10 mm at the time of revision and used the Genesis Biconvex Patella implant to reconstruct the patella. The patients were followed up for an average of 34 months (range, 24-65 months), and were followed up clinically and radiographically by Knee Society criteria. Patellar revisions and complications were noted and standard radiographic studies to ascertain radiolucent lines and patella/patellar component thickness were evaluated. The Knee Society Scores improved from an average of 45 points to 89 points. Function scores improved from an average of 47 points to 65 points. None of the patients has required revision surgery and no patellar fractures have been seen. Radiographs showed complete lucencies at the cement-bone interface in two knees. The mean residual central patella bone thickness was 6.5 mm and the average postoperative composite thickness was 14.5 mm. The data indicate that the use of the Genesis Biconvex Patella implant is a satisfactory method of treating revision of the patella when there is major bone deficiency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, Level IV-1 (case study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision and salvage patellar arthroplasty using a porous tantalum implant

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical results of a new surgical technique and novel porous tantalum implant for augmentation or arthroplasty of the patella for 11 patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty. Preoperative average knee function and pain scores were 24 and 20, respectively, and average range of motion (ROM) was 62 degrees. The low knee scores reflect the immobility, trauma, and/or pain associated with the patients' presenting conditions. At the most recent follow-up (average, 32 months), the average knee function and pain scores were 69 and 53, respectively, and the average ROM was 103 degrees. Radiographically, all implants were stable, and patient satisfaction has been excellent. These results indicate that this surgical technique and porous tantalum prosthesis can substantially improve function and reduce pain for patients with severe patellar bone loss and other complicating factors.

Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty

There are numerous options that need to be considered by the surgeon at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One needs to consider the reason for the revision, the type of patella in place, and the length of time the patella has been in place. The surgeon also needs to consider the status of the patellar bone stock, the stability of the patellar component (well-fixed or loose), and the component type (cemented or metal-backed). Assuming that the existing prosthesis is not metal-backed and has minimal PE wear, then it is preferable to retain a well-fixed all-PE cemented patellar button. However, if the button is metal-backed, then it probably is best to remove the button and replace it with an all-PE domed patellar component. Assuming more than 8 mm of patellar bone stock is remaining, it usually is best to cement an all-PE dome-shaped patella. However, if less than 8 mm is remaining, then that patient can be left with a patelloplasty, recognizing that this individual is going to continue with a high likelihood of anterior knee pain, subluxation, and poor functional results. In that situation, it may be preferable to consider a bone stock augmentation.

Treatment of the patella at reimplantation for septic total knee arthroplasty

The results of treatment of the patella at the time of aseptic revision of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been better with resurfacing of the patella than other modes of treatment such as leaving a bony shell. Treatment of the patella at the time of reimplantation of a TKA has not been addressed in prior studies. The ability to resurface the patella will be determined by the amount of bone remaining, integrity of the patella, vascularity, the location of the joint line, and soft tissue coverage for wound closure. The current review addresses the technique of patellar resurfacing and patellar bone defect treatment at the time of reimplantation of a TKA.

Use of a trabecular metal patella for marked patella bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty

This study evaluates the short-term results following patellar resurfacing with a trabecular metal patella shell in the setting of marked patellar bone loss at the time of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty consecutive patients undergoing revision TKA with the use of a trabecular metal patella were evaluated at a mean 23-month follow-up. All patients had marked patellar bone loss at surgery precluding resurfacing with a standard cemented patellar button. Results were good or excellent in 17 of 20 patients. There were no displacements of any trabecular metal patella shells, and the fixation appeared excellent despite the poor quality of bone remaining. Complications included 3 patients with polar patella fractures postoperatively. Qualitatively, these results compare favorably with patellar resection arthroplasty in this setting.

Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Problems with the patellofemoral articulation are the most common causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty. However, there are few reports describing outcomes following isolated revision of the patellar component.

METHODS

Forty knees with a Miller-Galante I prosthesis underwent isolated patellar revision (with or without lateral retinacular release). The Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores were collected prospectively, and radiographs made preoperatively and at the time of the final follow-up were analyzed with respect to alignment, component position, and patellar tracking. Particular attention was given to patients who had a reoperation or repeat revision and who had clinical or radiographic evidence of failure of the patellar revision.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of sixty-two months, fifteen (38%) of the forty knees that had had an isolated revision of the patellar component failed a second time. Eight of them required a total of twelve additional operations at a mean of forty-nine months after the patellar revision. Three of the failures were severe enough to require revision of two or more of the components. Of the twenty-five knees that had not failed, the average Hospital for Special Surgery knee score at the time of the final follow-up was 87 points. Of the seven knees that did not undergo reoperation but were deemed to be failures on the basis of the patients' symptoms, the average Hospital for Special Surgery knee score at the time of the final follow-up was 72 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated patellar revision, with or without concurrent lateral retinacular release, was associated with a high rate of reoperation and a relatively low rate of success. Elements of the implant design and component alignment contributed to the patellar component failure; both should be scrutinized carefully in patients who are seen with this problem, prior to proceeding with isolated revision of the patellar component of a total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Fate of the unrevised all-polyethylene patellar component in revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

During revision total knee arthroplasty, the alternatives for addressing the well-positioned and secure all-polyethylene patellar component with minimal or no wear include retention, revision, and resection. The purpose of the present study was to determine the intermediate-term fate of all-polyethylene patellar components that were left in situ at the time of revision tibiofemoral arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 202 revision total knee arthroplasties, performed at four centers, in which a well-fixed, well-positioned all-polyethylene patellar component with minimal wear was retained. Clinical evaluation was performed to identify the presence of anterior knee symptoms or patellar failures, and the Knee Society clinical scores were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight percent of the revision tibiofemoral components were from a different manufacturer than the retained patellar component. Twenty-one patients (twenty-one knees; 10%) reported anterior knee pain at a mean duration of follow-up of seven years (range, two to fourteen years). Eleven of the twenty-one knees with anterior knee pain had evidence of component loosening, excessive wear, or delamination either on follow-up radiographs or on direct inspection at the time of reoperation. In the other ten knees, the findings were attributable to osseous impingement on the femoral component or soft-tissue dysfunction (including soft-tissue impingement, subluxation, and scarring). Seventeen of the twenty-one patients with anterior knee pain underwent additional surgery to address the source of the pain. Failures due to loosening or wear occurred only in patients in whom the patellar component had been sterilized with gamma irradiation in air; these failures occurred at a mean 7.3 years after revision (eleven years after primary total knee arthroplasty). The likelihood of patellar component failure was significantly greater when the component had been gamma irradiated in air than when it had been sterilized with another method (p = 0.0008). The average knee score increased from 42 to 86 points, and the average function score increased from 46 to 70 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Retaining a well-positioned, stable all-polyethylene patellar component at the time of revision tibiofemoral arthroplasty can be successful, provided that the polyethylene has not oxidized. Manufacturing mismatch is acceptable with most contemporary designs provided that the patellar component articulates appropriately with the femoral implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of an intraoperative patellar fracture during revision total knee arthroplasty

An intraoperative vertical patellar fracture occurred through a central osteolytic defect during removal of a metal-backed patellar component. The fracture was treated successfully with cerclage wire fixation and implantation of a cemented patellar component.

Patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella

When severe bone loss precludes reimplantation of a new patellar component during revision knee arthroplasty, the treatment options include patellar bone grafting, patellar component resection arthroplasty, and patellectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results of patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella for which insertion of another patellar component was not possible. Thirty-five knees (31 patients) were treated with patellar component resection arthroplasty for aseptic patellar component failure associated with severely compromised patellar bone stock. Followup averaged 7.9 years (range, 2-18 years). There was a significant improvement in Knee Society pain and function scores. Pain relief was more dramatic than functional improvement. The range of motion also improved significantly and in particular preoperative extensor lag was resolved in the majority of patients. Patients treated with isolated patellar resection arthroplasty were more likely to have continuing pain and require reoperation compared with patients who had concomitant revision of the tibial and femoral components. Correct positioning and the stability of tibial and femoral components should be tested carefully at the time of patellar resection arthroplasty and considered for revision if malpositioned either axially or rotationally.

The Insall legacy in total knee arthroplasty

John N. Insall was a pioneer in the field of knee surgery. He was a rare individual who accomplished unparalleled levels of success as a surgeon, designer, and teacher. During the past 4 decades, he was instrumental in evolving total knee arthroplasty to its current state of excellence. Insall's impact on orthopaedics is felt by all who have come in contact with him.

Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis

A retrospective study was performed on 15 patients receiving 16 S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge total knee prostheses that were evaluated with at least a 2-year follow-up (range, 27-71 months). Indications for its use included severe instability and bone loss. The average patient age was 63 years (range, 33-83 years). There were 15 revision arthroplasties and 1 primary arthroplasty. Knee Society scores showed notable improvement in pain, motion, and stability (33.6 preoperatively vs 76.5 postoperatively; P <.0001) and approached significant improvement in function (29.2 preoperatively vs 43.5 postoperatively; P =.11). After excluding a patient with a traumatically ruptured patellar tendon, the probability of the latter comparison improved (P <.01). There was no evidence of loosening, and complete bone apposition was seen in nearly all cases. A high percentage of satisfactory results can be achieved when using this mobile-bearing hinge knee prosthesis for these indications.

Bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Severe patellar bone loss may preclude adequate fixation of another patellar prosthesis as a part of revision knee replacement. The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and early clinical results of an alternative to the conventional treatment options of either patellectomy or retention of the remaining patellar osseous shell. The goals of this procedure are to restore patellar bone stock and potentially to improve the functional outcome.

METHODS

Severe patellar bone loss had left a "patellar shell" that precluded insertion of another patellar implant in nine of 100 consecutive knees undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty. Rather than performing a patellectomy or simply retaining the patellar osseous shell in these nine knees (eight patients), I performed a surgical procedure in which a tissue flap was secured to the patellar rim to contain cancellous bone graft inserted into the patellar bone defect. Final follow-up was at a mean of 36.7 months (range, twenty-four to fifty-five months) after the patellar bone-grafting procedure.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative Knee Society scores for function and pain were 39 points (range, 18 to 82 points) and 40 points (range, 20 to 80 points), respectively. At the time of final follow-up, the Knee Society function and pain scores had improved significantly, to a mean function score of 91 points (range, 80 to 98 points) and a mean pain score of 84 points (range, 65 to 100 points) (p<0.05). The point of greatest patellar thickness measured intraoperatively ranged from 7 to 9 mm. Patellar thickness on immediate postoperative Merchant radiographs averaged 22 mm (range, 20 to 25 mm) whereas, at the time of final follow-up, patellar thickness averaged 19.7 mm (range, 17 to 22.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast with other treatment alternatives, this surgical procedure imparts the potential for restoring patellar bone stock and may improve functional outcome by facilitating patellar tracking and improving quadriceps leverage. On the basis of satisfactory short-term to mid-term clinical results, this technique of patellar bone-grafting appears to be an important addition to the armamentarium of surgeons performing revision knee arthroplasties.