Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses

Less wear in deep-dished mobile compared to fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty of the same design at 5-year follow-up: a randomised controlled model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective randomised controlled study was to compare wear characteristics and functional outcome between deep-dished mobile bearing (MB) and fixed bearing (FB) cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesised that deep-dished MB reduces polyethylene wear and improves patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients were randomised to receive a MB or FB tibia component of the same cemented TKA design. Patients were evaluated over a 5-year follow-up period. Medial and lateral wear were assessed using model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) and compared with the direct postoperative minimal joint space measurement. Functional outcome was assessed by the clinician-derived KSS and OKS, WOMAC, LEAS, and FJS-12. All data were derived using a general linear mixed model.

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, decreased wear in the MB compared to the FB group was observed on the lateral side (0.07 ± 0.17 mm, p = 0.026), but not on the medial side (0.31 ± 0.055 mm, p = 0.665). Functional outcomes improved with a statistical significant effect over time, with no significant differences between groups (all p > 0.17).

CONCLUSION

This model-based RSA study with 5-year follow-up showed that cemented deep-dished MB reduced lateral polyethylene wear as compared to FB in a single TKA system, whilst clinical outcomes were comparable. Longer follow-up is needed to establish clinical implications of these altered wear patterns and determine type of wear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1 randomised controlled trial.

The Effect of Congruent Tibial Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether modern congruent tibial inserts are associated with superior outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Background: Ultracongruent fixed-bearing (UCFB) and medial congruent fixed-bearing (MCFB) inserts have been known to be effective in total knee arthroplasty with patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, no supporting evidence to date exists to rank the clinical outcomes of these various congruent inserts in TKA compared with other important considerations in TKA including cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing (CRFB) and posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing (PSFB) inserts. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 15 May 2022. We selected studies involving an active comparison of UCFB or MCFB in TKAs. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compared different congruent inserts. We ranked the clinical outcomes by SUCRA score with the estimate of the best treatment probability. Our primary outcomes were revision rates and radiolucent lines. Secondary outcomes were functional scores, including the range of motion (ROM), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and WOMAC. Results: Eighteen RCTs with 1793 participants were analyzed. Our NMA ranked MCFB, CRFB, and UCFB with the lowest revision rates. CRFB and UCFB had the fewest radiolucent lines. UCFB had overall the best ROM. UCFB and MCFB had the best OKS score overall. Conclusions: The ranking probability for better clinical outcomes in congruent inserts demonstrated the superiority of congruent tibial inserts, including UCFB and MCFB. UCFB may be associated with better ROM and postoperative functional outcomes. However, integrating future RCTs for high-level evidence is necessary to confirm these findings.

The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: Increased Revision Risk With Mobile Bearings in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may reduce wear and improve patellar tracking but may increase revision risk due to tibial component design, balance complexity, and bearing dislocation. We utilized the American Joint Replacement Registry to examine risk of revision with MB compared to fixed-bearing (FB) designs.

METHODS

An analysis of primary TKA in patients over 65 years was performed with American Joint Replacement Registry data linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2012 to 2019. Analyses compared MB to FB designs with a subanalysis of implants from a single company. We identified 485,024 TKAs, with 452,199 (93.2%) FB-TKAs and 32,825 (6.8%) MB-TKAs. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used for all-cause revision and revision for infection, adjusting for sex, age, and competing risk of mortality. Event-free survival curves evaluated time to all-cause revision and revision for infection.

RESULTS

MB-TKAs were at an increased risk for all-cause revision: hazard ratio (HR) 1.36 ([95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.49], P < .0001) but not revision for infection: HR 1.06 ([95% CI 0.90-1.25], P = .52). When comparing implants within a single company, MB-TKAs were at an increased risk of all-cause revision: HR 1.55 ([95% CI 1.38-1.73], P < .0001). Event-free survival curves demonstrated increased risk for all-cause revision for MB-TKA across all time points, with a greater magnitude of risk up to 8 years.

CONCLUSION

Although survivorship of both designs was outstanding, MB-TKA designs demonstrated increased risk for all-cause revision. Additional investigation is needed to determine if this is related to patient selection factors, surgical technique, bearing, or implant design.

Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing mobile-bearing with fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of all-cause revision rates, aspetic loosening, knee functional scores, range of motion and radiographic lucent lines and osteolysis.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Web of Science were searched up to January 2020. Randomized controlled trials that compared primary mobile-bearing with fixed-bearing TKA, reporting at least one of the outcomes of interest, at a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. All outcomes of interest were pooled at short-term (< 5 years), mid-term (5 to 9 years) and long-term (> = 10 years) follow-up intervals.

Results

A total of 70 eligible articles were included in the qualitative and statistical analyses. There was no difference between mobile-bearing or fixed-bearing TKA at short-term, mid-term and long-term follow-ups in all outcome measures including all-cause revision rate, aseptic loosening, oxford knee score, knee society score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, maximum knee flexion, radiographic lucent lines and radiographic osteolysis.

Conclusion

The current level of evidence demonstrated that both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs achieved excellent outcomes, yet it does not prove the theoretical advantages of the mobile-bearing insert over its fixed-bearing counterpart. The use of either design could therefore be supported based on the outcomes assessed in this study.

Level of Evidence: Level II, Therapeutic

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1007/s00590-021-02999-x).

Position of the quadriceps actuator influences knee loads during simulated squat testing

The "Oxford Rig" cadaveric simulator permits researchers and clinicians to study knee mechanics during a simulated squatting motion. The motion of the lower limb in the Oxford Rig is typically controlled by a single actuator that applies tension to the quadriceps tendon. The location of the quadriceps actuator, however, has differed across published descriptions of the Oxford Rig. Actuators have been placed on the femur and pelvis, and on "grounded" locations external to the specimen, but the consequences of this placement for knee kinematics and kinetics are unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine these effects using a validated computational musculoskeletal model. When the actuator was placed on the femur or pelvis, forces realistically increased with knee flexion, with quadriceps and patellofemoral contact forces exceeding 2000 N and 3000 N, respectively, at 100° flexion. When the actuator was grounded, however, forces were substantially reduced and did not monotonically increase with flexion. Articular joint contact forces were not strongly influenced by changing the location of the actuator from the femur to the pelvis, with small RMS differences in quadriceps forces (48.2 N), patellofemoral forces (83.6 N), and tibiofemoral forces (58.9 N) between these conditions. The location of the actuator did not substantially affect knee kinematics. The results of this study suggest that the quadriceps actuator of the Oxford Rig should be attached to either the femur or the pelvis when the goal is to make realistic estimates of quadriceps forces and articular contact forces within the knee joint.

P.F.C Sigma® cruciate retaining fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study with minimum 10-year follow-up

AIMS

To prospectively compare long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following a cruciate retaining fixed-bearing (FB) and a mobile-bearing (MB) primary total knee replacement (TKR).

METHODS

We prospectively reviewed 113 TKRs in 99 patients (14 bilateral) with a PFC sigma cruciate retaining rotating platform system, at an average follow-up of 11.1 years (range 10-12). Results were contrasted with those from 89 TKRs in 72 patients (17 bilateral) with a PFC sigma cruciate fixed-bearing prosthesis, at an average follow-up of 12.1 years (range 10-14.1). Outcomes collected included pre- and post-operative range of motion, Oxford Knee Scores, complications encountered, as well as radiographical assessments of polyethylene wear.

RESULTS

In the MB group, mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 16 pre-operatively to 42 at final follow-up. The mean range of motion was 115° (75-130). In the FB group, mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 16.2 pre-operatively to 42.5 at final follow-up. The mean range of motion was 111.2 (80-135) degrees at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We failed to elicit an objectively demonstrable clinical difference between the MB- and FB-implanted knees. Similarly, radiological benefits of the MB implants with regard to polyethylene wear were not evident at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

It is hypothesized that mobile polyethylene bearings in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may confer benefits with regard to range of motion and have improved clinical outcome scores in comparison with an arthroplasty with a fixed-bearing design. Our study compares clinical outcomes between patients who undergo TKA with either a rotating platform or fixed bearing using a posterior cruciate-retaining design.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-one patients were randomized to receive either a rotating-platform (161 patients) or a fixed-bearing (170 patients) implant. All patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 1 and 2 years post-operatively using standard tools (range of movement, Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Score, SF12 and Patella Score).

RESULTS

There was no difference in pre- to 2-year post-operative outcomes between the groups with regard to improvement in range of motion (10° ± 16 vs. 9° ± 15), improvement in Oxford Knee Score (-17.6 ± 9.9 vs. -19.1 ± 8.4), improvement in American Knee Society Score (49.5 ± 24.7 vs. 50.7 ± 21.0), function (23.6 ± 19.6 vs. 25.0 ± 22.5) and pain (34.9 ± 16.2 vs. 35.8 ± 14.1) subscores, improvement in SF12 Score (10.0 ± 16.3 vs. 12.3 ± 15.8) or improvement in Patella Score (9.7 ± 7.4 vs. 10.6 ± 7.1).

CONCLUSION

No difference was demonstrated in clinical outcome between patients with a rotating-platform and fixed-bearing posterior cruciate-retaining TKA at 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Assessment of reactive synovitis in rotating-platform posterior-stabilized design: a 10-year prospective matched-pair MRI study

This is the first long-term (mean 11.6 years), prospective, matched-pair study (based on age, gender, BMI and UCLA scores) using MAVRIC (multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination) magnetic resonance imaging to analyze reactive synovitis and osteolysis between rotating-platform posterior-stabilized (RP-PS), fixed-bearing metal-back (FB-MB), and all-polyethylene tibial (APT) in active patients (24 total, 8 in each group, mean age of 64 years, mean UCLA of 8.5) with identical femoral component and polyethylene. Reactive synovitis was observed in 6 RP-PS (75%), all 8 FB-MB (100%), and 6 APT (75%). There was a significant difference between the RP-PS and FB-MB knees in volumetric synovitis (P=0.023). Osteolysis with bone loss more than 4mm was seen in 3 FB-MB, 2 APT and none for RP-PS. These were not statistically significant.

Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear

BACKGROUND

Polyethylene wear is often cited as the cause of failure of TKA. Rotating platform (RP) knees show notable surface damage on the rotating surface raising concerns about increased wear compared to fixed bearing inserts.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore addressed the following questions: Is wear in RP inserts increased compared to that in fixed bearing inserts? Does the surface roughness of the tibial tray have a measurable impact on in vivo wear of modular knees? And does wear rate differ between posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) knees?

METHODS

We compared wear in two series of retrieved knee devices: 94 RP mobile bearings with polished cobalt-chrome (CoCr) trays and 218 fixed bearings with both rough titanium (Ti) and polished CoCr trays. Minimum implantation time was 0.4 months (median, 36 months; range, 0.4-124 months) and 2 months (median, 72 months; range, 2-179 months) for the RP and fixed bearing series, respectively.

RESULTS

Wear rate was lower for RP inserts than for fixed bearing inserts. Backside wear rate was lower for fixed bearing inserts mated to polished CoCr trays than for inserts from rough Ti trays. Inserts against polished trays (RP or fixed bearing) showed no increase in wear rate increase over time. Wear rate of PS knees was similar to that of CR knees.

CONCLUSIONS

We found mobile bearing knees have reduced wear rate compared to fixed bearings, likely due to the polished CoCr tibial tray surface. Fixed bearing inserts in polished CoCr trays wear less than their counterparts in rough Ti trays, and the wear rate of inserts from polished CoCr trays does not appear to increase with time.

Randomized clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically detectable differences at five years

BACKGROUND

For some surgeons, rotating-platform total knee designs are an intellectually appealing option to use for total knee arthroplasty because of the contention that they can self-align and accommodate small mismatches in the rotational position of the tibial and femoral components. We carried out a randomized clinical trial to determine if a posterior-stabilized, rotating-platform knee design provided better maximum knee flexion, better function, or better durability at five years of follow-up when compared with a fixed-bearing design.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties involved a single type of distal femoral implant (posterior-stabilized) and three different types of tibial implant (all-polyethylene fixed-bearing, modular-metal-backed fixed-bearing, and rotating-platform). The three tibial implant groups were balanced dynamically with a computerized randomization process that accounted for patient age, sex, and body mass index; surgeon; and implant type. Patients returned for examination and radiographs at three months, one year, two years, and five years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Knee range of motion was not significantly different among the all-polyethylene, modular-metal-backed, and rotating-platform tibial component groups at two years (mean, 111°, 111°, and 110°, respectively) or five years (mean, 110°, 109°, and 109°, respectively). Function, as measured with Knee Society scores, was not significantly different among the all-polyethylene, modular-metal-backed, and rotating-platform groups at two years (mean, 90, 91, and 91 points, respectively) or five years (mean, 88, 89, and 88 points, respectively). Stair-climbing scores were not significantly different among the three groups at two years (mean, 39, 40, and 39 points, respectively) or five years (mean, 37, 40, and 36 points, respectively). There were four revisions: one in the all-polyethylene group (patellar fracture), two in the modular-metal-backed group (aseptic loosening), and one in the rotating-platform group (deep infection).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized clinical trial, the rotating-platform total knee design was reliable and durable but did not provide better maximum knee flexion, better function, or better durability at five years postoperatively when compared with a posterior-stabilized, fixed-bearing design incorporating either an all-polyethylene or a modular-metal-backed tibial component.

Ten-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized knee was designed to decrease polyethylene wear and to address challenges associated with Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing knees. The purpose of the present prospective study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results and the survival rate for this implant.

METHODS

From January 2000 to October 2001, 117 consecutive patients (138 knees) underwent rotating-platform posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with cement. All patients were followed prospectively. At a mean of 10 ± 0.4 years (range, 9.5 to eleven years) of follow-up, twenty patients had died and eight had been lost to follow-up, leaving eighty-nine patients (106 knees) for analysis.

RESULTS

A good to excellent result according to the Knee Society pain score, which improved from an average of 44 to 94 points, was achieved in 96% (eighty-five) of the eighty-nine patients in the final cohort. The mean knee motion improved from 111° to 119°. The prevalence of postoperative pain was 14%. The prevalence of asymptomatic crepitation was 9.4%, and the prevalence of painful crepitation requiring scar excision was 3.8%. Radiographic analysis revealed no malalignment, aseptic loosening, or osteolysis. There were three revisions: one for the treatment of infection and two for the treatment of traumatic supracondylar fractures. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the ten-year survival rate was 100% with revision due to mechanical failure as the end point, 97.7% with revision for any reason as the end point, and 95% with any reoperation as the end point.

CONCLUSIONS

The ten-year follow-up of the rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty demonstrated excellent clinical results and survival rates with no failures due to osteolysis or loosening.

Three-dimensional kinematics during deep-flexion kneeling in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

We performed an in vivo radiographic analysis of tibiofemoral and polyethylene (PE) insert motions during weight-bearing kneeling beyond 120° of flexion in one high-flexion knee arthroplasty design to determine if kinematics changed over time and if axial rotation occur between the PE insert and the tibial baseplate. Twenty knees implanted with a posterior-stabilized rotating-platform (RP) knee arthroplasty were postoperatively evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. The averaged flexion angles were 122°, 129°, and 131° at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, showing that the improvement of flexion was achieved up to 6 months. The femoral condyles translated posteriorly from extension to maximum flexion. There was a significant increase in AP translation of femoral lateral condyle in the maximum flexion kneeling between 12 months and the two other intervals (p=0.0003 at 3 months and p=0.016 at 6 months), while no differences in those of medial condyle between all intervals. Almost all rotation occurred at the surface between the tibial baseplate and the PE insert (p=0.0479 at 3 months, p=0.0008 at 6 months, and p=0.0479 at 12 months), almost no rotation occurred at the surface between the PE insert and the femoral component. There were significant increases in the amount of internal rotation angle during full flexion between the tibial component and the PE insert up to 12 months. Knees implanted with this RP knee arthroplasty design show deep-flexion knee kinematics that are consistent with the implant design intent.

Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: design factors in minimizing wear

Premature polyethylene wear is a major cause of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. It has been attributed to numerous factors including poor surgical technique, reduced polyethylene thickness, poor locking mechanisms of modular fixed bearing tibial components, gamma irradiation sterilization techniques in the presence of oxygen, and low conformity implant designs. The incidence of implantation of TKA into younger patients who have increased activity requirements and longevity expectations is increasing. This requires continued analysis of design features lessening polyethylene wear. The purpose of this manuscript is to review clinical and basic scientific studies of factors influencing polyethylene wear, focusing on the potential benefits of mobile bearing TKA which potentially reduce long-term polyethylene wear by providing increased implant conformity and reduced polyethylene contact stresses. In vivo kinematic studies have shown self-alignment of the polyethylene bearing with the femoral component typically occurs in rotating platform TKA designs which should hypothetically lessen polyethylene surface stresses, minimize stabilizing post impingement, and increase the potential for enhanced polyethylene longevity.

Changes in knee motion over the first 3 years with a mobile-bearing prosthesis

The present work aims to evaluate the mobility of the polyethylene bearing in 25 patients implanted with a mobile-bearing PCL-retaining TKR (Interax ISA, Striker Howmedica) under in vivo, weight-bearing conditions over 3 years' follow-up. We compared the bearing motion in response to specific tests in two consecutive follow-ups with Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA). Results showed that polyethylene continued to displace on the tibial baseplate over time: longitudinal rotations and medio-lateral translations tended to increase at the second follow-up (mean increases 0.7+/-2.5 degrees and 0.34+/-1.08 mm, respectively), while sagittal translations did not show any relevant change. Longitudinal rotations and AP translations were preserved when present at both follow-ups. Nevertheless, no statistical evidence of repeatable pattern of motion was found, since bearings frequently reversed their pattern of motion between the two follow-ups. The unconstrained polyethylene mobility resulted in an unrepeatable, erratic pattern of bearing motion intra-patient and over time. The changes in knee motion were found not to affect the clinical results over the first 3 years of follow-up. As in a fixed-bearing design, mobile-bearing design was not able to reproduce normal knee kinematics.

Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: do the polyethylene bearings rotate?

In vivo kinematics were determined during a weightbearing deep knee bend in 39 patients implanted with four different designs of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty to assess polyethylene bearing mobility patterns and magnitudes. The femoral and tibial components and mobile polyethylene insert (implanted with four tantalum beads) were overlaid onto the fluoroscopic images using a three-dimensional model-fitting technique to determine bearing mobility. Three of the four designs were tested at a single time interval while one was evaluated at two postoperative intervals, (12 months apart) to assess changes in bearing mobility with time. All patients had polyethylene bearing rotation relative to the tibial tray and minimal rotation relative to the femoral component. The average maximum amounts of bearing rotation ranged from 8.4 degrees to 10.3 degrees (range, 3.0 degrees -20.1 degrees). In patients evaluated at two time intervals, the average maximum bearing rotation increased from 8.5 degrees (range, 3.4 degrees -15.5 degrees) at 3 months to 9.8 degrees (range, 48 degrees -14.1 degrees) 15 months postoperatively. The presented data demonstrates polyethylene bearing mobility occurs following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty and mobility is maintained during the time interval tested. The presence of bearing mobility should result in lower contact stresses reducing the potential for polyethylene wear.

Fixation of total knee arthroplasty improved by mobile-bearing design

We examined the in vivo displacement of mobile-bearing polyethylene and its effect on prosthesis-bone fixation. Thirty-five patients with the Interax ISA mobile platform total knee arthroplasties were examined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Our protocol included weightbearing to measure the range of motion of the mobile platform in relation to the tibial component. We also studied the micromotions of the tibial component in relation to the tibia during a 2-year followup. The analysis of micromotion (maximum total motion mean, 0.5 mm; subsidence mean, 0.15 mm) showed this mobile platform design is stable and improves fixation at the prosthesis-bone interface. Longitudinal rotations of the mobile platform occurred in all patients and followed a homogeneous pattern of motion, depending on the examination. However, anteroposterior translations did not show any patterns with specific examination. This suggests the meniscal movement adapts itself to different weightbearing conditions. We measured the in vivo mobile-bearing displacement under static loading conditions. We also observed improved fixation at the bone-prosthesis interface.

Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement?

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental replacement can be an alternative to tibial osteotomy in younger, active patients with unicompartmental knee disease. In unicompartmental replacement, the other compartments and knee ligaments are largely untouched. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the knee kinematics after unicompartmental replacement may also be unchanged. To test this hypothesis, knee kinematics and quadriceps tension were recorded before and after replacement with a unicompartmental design and then with a tricompartmental design.

METHODS

Six human cadaver knees were tested before implantation, after implantation with a bicruciate-retaining unicompartmental knee prosthesis, and after implantation with a posterior cruciate-retaining tricompartmental knee prosthesis. The unicompartmental prosthesis was initially implanted, and it was then revised to a total condylar knee replacement. The knee kinematics were measured with use of an electromagnetic tracking device while the knee was put through dynamic simulated stair-climbing under peak flexion moments of approximately 40 N-m. Quadriceps tension was also measured for all three conditions.

RESULTS

No significant differences in tibial axial rotation were noted between the intact and unicompartmental conditions. However, tricompartmental replacement significantly affected tibial axial rotation (p = 0.001). Femoral rollback was not significantly affected by either unicompartmental or tricompartmental arthroplasty. Quadriceps tension was also similar among all three conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this in vitro cadaver study, the tricompartmental replacement significantly changed knee kinematics while the unicompartmental replacement preserved normal knee kinematics.

Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the postoperative recovery and early results of 2 groups of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: 107 patients received an established fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis (Legacy Posterior Stabilized [LPS]), and 103 patients the meniscal-bearing prosthesis (Meniscal Bearing Knee [MBK]). Surgical procedures were the same for both groups except for posterior cruciate ligament management, which was sacrificed in the LPS group and spared but completely released from the tibia in the MBK group. At an average follow-up of 36 months, knee, function, and patellar scores were comparable in both groups. The LPS group showed a significantly higher maximum flexion than the MBK group (112 degrees vs 108 degrees). Using a fixed-bearing or a mobile-bearing design did not seem to influence the short-term recovery and early results after knee arthroplasty. Key words: total knee arthroplasty, mobile bearing, knee prosthesis, meniscal-bearing knee, posterior stabilized, prospective randomized.

In vivo polyethylene bearing mobility is maintained in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

In vivo knee kinematics, including polyethylene bearing mobility, were determined in a group of nine patients implanted with a posterior stabilized, mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Each patient, while under fluoroscopic surveillance, did a weightbearing deep knee bend and was analyzed using a 3-D computer model-fitting technique. Patients were evaluated at three and 15 months postoperatively. All nine patients had polyethylene bearing rotation relative to the tibial tray at both times, with the maximum amount of polyethylene bearing rotation at any flexion interval averaging 8.5 (range, 5.2-15.5) and 9.8 (range, 4.8-14.2) at 3 and 15 months, respectively. Minimal rotation of the polyethylene bearing relative to the femoral component was observed, averaging only 1.9 and 1.0 of rotation from full extension to maximum knee flexion at three and 15 months, respectively. This study determined that the polyethylene bearing is primarily rotating relative to the tibia rather than the femoral component. Therefore, as the femoral component axially rotates, the polyethylene bearing is rotating a similar magnitude in the same direction. This should result in reduced shear stresses on the superior aspect of the polyethylene bearing, lessening polyethylene wear.

A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty

A multicenter analysis was done to determine in vivo femorotibial axial rotation magnitudes and patterns in 1,027 knees (normal knees, nonimplanted ACL-deficient knees, and multiple designs of total knee arthroplasty). All knees were analyzed using fluoroscopy and a three-dimensional computer model-fitting technique during a deep knee bend and/or gait. Normal knees showed 16.5 degrees and 5.7 degrees of internal tibial rotation during a deep knee bend and gait, respectively. Rotation magnitudes and the percent having normal axial rotation patterns decreased in all total knee arthroplasty groups during a deep knee bend. During gait, all knee arthroplasty groups had similar rotational patterns (limited magnitudes). Average axial rotational magnitudes in gait and a deep knee bend were similar among major implant categories (ie, fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing, etc). Average values in normal knees and ACL-retaining total knee arthroplasty patients (16.5 degrees and 8.1 degrees , respectively) were higher than in groups in which the ACL was absent (< 4.0 degrees ). All total knee arthroplasty groups had at least 19% of patients have a reverse axial rotational pattern during a deep knee bend and at least 31% during gait. Normal axial rotation patterns are essential for good patellar tracking, reduction of patellofemoral shear forces, and maximization of knee flexion.

Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results

This study compares the fixed-bearing PFC Sigma Total Knee Arthroplasty to the recently introduced rotating-platform version of the same design in 26 patients. At an average follow-up time of 46 months for the fixed-bearing side and 16 months for the rotating-platform side, no significant differences were found in terms of knee preference, knee pain, range of motion, overall satisfaction, or Knee Society scores (KSSs). No revisions, subluxations, dislocations, or infections were seen. Also no radiographic evidence of component loosening, osteolysis, or malalignment was found in any knee. The results of cementing the PFC Sigma rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee show excellent patient satisfaction at 1 year and comparable clinical and radiographic results to the fixed-bearing version.

An analysis of rotating-platform total knee replacements

Rotating-platform, mobile-bearing total knee replacements have been developed to improve knee kinematics, lower contact stresses on the polyethylene tibial component, minimize constraint, and allow implant self-alignment. The purpose of the current study was to examine some of these parameters. Gait studies during normal gait showed that the stance phase was associated with knee flexion between 8 degrees and 15 degrees. Contact area studies have shown two types of rotating-platform total knee replacements, namely gait congruous (congruous only during the stance phase of gait) and totally congruous (congruous up to 90 degrees knee flexion) implants. Knee simulator studies have shown increased gravimetric wear with rotating-platform total knee replacements compared with their fixed-bearing counterparts. Rotate-only implants had less gravimetric wear than rotate and translate rotating-platform total knee replacements. Clinical studies show similar outcomes (knee scores, range of motion, and complications) when rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee replacements are compared. Although attractive, the benefits of rotating-platform total knee replacements still need to be proven.