Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Component rotational mismatch in the standing position is a potential risk factor for unfavourable functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study assessed rotational mismatch between components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the supine and standing positions and aimed to investigate the effect of rotational mismatch in the standing position on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Seventy-one patients (71 knees) who underwent TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were used to investigate rotational mismatches between components. Rotational mismatches between components were examined on postoperative standing whole-leg and supine knee radiographs using a three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional model image registration technique, and the angles between the reference axes of the components were measured. Component alignment was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography images, and a questionnaire (2011 version of the Knee Society Score: [KSS 2011]) was mailed to investigate postoperative PROMs.

Results

In the entire cohort, rotational mismatches in the supine and standing positions were similar (p = 0.9315). In 15% of patients, the mismatch was large (>5°) in the supine position but small (<5°) in the standing position (overestimated group). However, in 23% of patients, the mismatch was small (<5°) in the supine position and large (>5°) in the standing position (underestimated group). The underestimated group had severe preoperative varus deformity, resulting in external rotation of both femoral and tibial components. Rotational mismatch in the standing position (p = 0.0032) was a significant risk factor for unfavourable PROMs. Patients with a mismatch in the standing position had significantly lower scores than those without a mismatch (p = 0.0215), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference values.

Conclusions

The underestimated group is clinically important because the surgical procedure and intraoperative assessment of component placement are performed in the supine position. In cases of severe preoperative varus deformity, care should be taken not to place the component in malrotation to avoid rotational mismatch in the standing position.

Level of Evidence

Ⅳ, Case series.

The anteroposterior distance between the posterior edge of the medial tibial condyle and the posterior edge of the fibular head in the lateral view can be a reference in determining the axis perpendicular to the tibial anteroposterior axis

BACKGROUND

Obtaining an accurate tibial lateral view is important during high tibial osteotomy. This study investigated whether the posterior edge of the medial/lateral tibial condyle (PEMTC/PELTC) and the posterior edge of the fibular head (PEFH) in a lateral view could be a reference for determining the accurate tibial lateral view.

METHODS

A total of 75 lower limbs in 38 subjects were evaluated in this study. In order to target healthy knees, subjects undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty were selected. The MF/LF, comprising the anteroposterior distance between PEMTC/PELTC and PEFH, was measured on the lateral view of the tibial bone model based on the tibial anteroposterior (AP) axis (true lateral view: TLV). In addition, measurements were calculated in the model with a 10° external/internal rotation. Using these measurements, linear regression analysis was performed to predict the tibial rotation with MF/LF.

RESULTS

The mean MF/LF was 0.9/4.6 mm (P < 0.001). MF and LF increased with incremental tibial rotation. Regression formulas were derived from these results as follows: Tibial rotation = (1) -1.01 + 1.06 × MF (R2 = 0.87, P < 0.001), (2) -8.70 + 1.86 × LF (R2 = 0.51, P < 0.001). The mean tibial rotation angle when MF was 0 mm was -0.9°.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on formula (1) and actual measurements, the mean tibial rotation angle when MF is 0 mm is an internal rotation of about 1°. Therefore, a lateral view, in which PEMTC and PEFH are seen colinearly, can be the approximate TLV. The MF can be a suitable intraoperative reference in determining TLV.

Self-aligned Technique for Tibial Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty Lessening Rotational Malalignment in Measured Resection and Gap-Balancing Techniques

BACKGROUND

Femorotibial rotational mismatch can occur when there is a rotational malalignment in either the tibial or femoral component. Self-aligned technique was proposed for orienting the tibial component in relation to the femoral prosthesis to reduce rotational malalignment between components. Therefore, we aimed to compare the rotational angle of the femoral and tibial components, as well as the femorotibial rotational mismatch, between the measured resection (MR) and gap-balancing (GB) techniques when combined with a self-aligned technique.

METHODS

We conducted a nonrandomized, experimental study with 50 patients in each group. The femoral rotation was set to 3° external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis in the MR group, whereas the femur was resected to obtain an optimal rectangular flexion gap in the GB group. The self-aligned method was used to set the tibial rotation in both groups. Femoral and tibial rotational alignments were evaluated compared to a surgical transepicondylar axis of the femur using computed tomography. Rotational mismatch was defined as a difference between the femoral and tibial rotational alignments. A positive value indicated that the component was externally rotated relative to the reference line.

RESULTS

The femoral component of the GB group was more externally rotated than that of the MR group (1.52° ± 1.31° vs 0.28° ± 1.16°, p < 0.001). However, the tibial rotational angle was not statistically significantly different between the MR and GB groups (1.28° ± 3.17° vs. 1.86° ± 2.81°, p = 0.220), and the rotational mismatch was 1.00° ± 3.28° and 0.34° ± 2.71°, respectively (p = 0.306).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the femoral component of the GB group had a greater degree of external rotation than that of the MR group, the use of a self-aligned technique for tibial component placement resulted in no significant difference in tibial rotational alignment or rotational mismatch. This technique helps align the tibial component with the femoral component and lessen the degree of rotational malalignment in both the MR and GB techniques.

Is the Akagi Line a Reliable Landmark for Adjusting the Rotational Axis of the Tibial Component in Patients with Patellofemoral Instability?

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate whether the Akagi line is a reliable anatomic landmark for adjusting the rotational axis of the tibial component in patients with patellofemoral (PF) malalignment.

Materials and methods

This retrospective case-control study included 86 patients with PF instability and 129 controls. On the superimposed axial CT images, TT-TG, TT-PCL, nTT-TG, nTT-PCL, knee joint rotation, and the angle between the Akagi line and surgical transepicondylar axis (Akagi/sTEA angle) were measured. In addition, a modified Akagi line, drawn 1 cm medial to the patellar tendon attachment, was defined, and the angle between the new Akagi line and sTEA (mAkagi/sTEA angle) was also measured and compared between groups.

Results

There were 86 patients (47 females, 39 males) in the case group and 129 patients (56 females, 73 males) in the control group with a mean age of 35.7 ± 17.9 years and 41.1 ± 18.8 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Radiologic variables of PF alignment (TT-TG, TT-PCL, nTT-TG, nTT-PCL, and knee joint rotation) were significantly abnormal in the case group (p < 0.001 for all variables). The Akagi/sTEA angle was significantly higher in the case group, resulting in 89.5% external malrotation of the tibial component (> 10°). However, the tibial component was 96.5% aligned correctly (between 10° external and 3° internal rotation) in the control group. Using the modified Akagi line significantly improved the rotational alignment, and normal tibial rotation increased to 93.3% of the case group. The Akagi/sTEA angle strongly correlated with the knee rotation (rho: 0.735, p: 0.001), TT-TG (rho: 0.715, p: 0.001) and nTT-TG (rho: 0.783, p: 0.001). But the TT-PCL (rho: 0.459, p: 0.001) and nTT-PCL (rho: 0.589, p: 0.001) had a medium correlation.

Conclusions

The Akagi line might cause unacceptable external rotation of the tibial component in patients with PF malalignment. The use of the modified Akagi line described in this study may be a solution for the rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components in TKA.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment

PURPOSE

Image-based robotic tools improve the accuracy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) positioning, but few studies have examined its effect on axial alignment. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of tibial and femoral implant positioning, mainly the tibial rotation, during medial or lateral UKA, performed with an image-based robotic assisted system.

METHODS

A total of 71 UKA performed between September 2021 and June 2022 (53 medial and 18 lateral) were analyzed. All data regarding implant positioning (rotation, coronal and sagittal alignment) for tibial and femoral components were obtained using MAKO® software (Stryker®, Mahwah, USA) intra-operatively.

RESULTS

The lateral UKA had a mean internal tibial rotation of 15.4 ± 3°, a mean external femoral rotation of 0.96 ± 2.4°, and a mean tibial slope of 4.7 ± 1.3°. The medial UKA had a mean internal tibial rotation of 0.18 ± 2.7°, a mean internal femoral rotation of 0.35 ± 2.2°, and a mean tibial slope of 5.4 ± 1.3°. The tibial rotations, femoral valgus, tibial varus and tibial size significantly differed between medial and lateral UKA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in femoral rotation, flexion, femoral size, slope, and polyethylene thickness between medial and lateral UKA.

CONCLUSION

Medial and lateral UKA had significantly different implantation characteristics related to the biomechanics of the knee compartments. Image-based robotic UKA allowed precise femorotibial positioning per-operatively to match native kinematic alignment.

A computed tomographic evaluation of femoral and tibial rotational reference axes in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

 The surgical trans epicondylar axis (sTEA) is considered the gold standard for optimum rotation of the femoral component; however, no consensus exists on tibial component positioning. The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship of sTEA to various femoral and tibial reference axes in varus osteoarthritis (OA) knees and (ii) to study the intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the axis relationships.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 The study was done on preoperative computerised tomogram (CT) scans of 110 varus knees to assess the rotational relationships respectively of femoral side sTEA with whitesides line (WSL), posterior condylar axis (PCA), clinical trans epicondylar axis (cTEA) and on the tibial side sTEA with posterior tibial margin (PTM), anterior condylar axis (ACA), Akagi's line and line from the geometric centre of the tibial plateau to 1/3rd tibial tubercle (line GC 1/3rd TT).

RESULTS

 On the femoral side the mean angles of sTEA with WSL, PCA, cTEA were 95.64° ± 2.85°, 1.77° ± 1.88°, 4.19° ± 0.99° respectively. On the tibial side, the mean angles of sTEA with, PTM, ACA, Akagi's line, and line GC 1/3rd TT were 1.10° ± 4.69°, 11.98° ± 4.51°, 2.43° ± 4.35°, 16.04° ± 5.93° respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Contrary to the generalization, TEA has variable relationships. The surgical trans epicondylar axis was not at the assumed 3° of external rotation to PCA in 85% of knees, nor perpendicular to WSL in >95% of knees. Of the four tibial axes, Akagi's line was the least variable with sTEA. Furthermore, surgeons should also be aware of the multiple reference axes and the range of deviation from sTEA to optimize the rotational alignment of components.

Reference Axes for Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 1,351 Tibiae

BACKGROUND

Many anatomic landmarks have been described for setting tibial component rotation intraoperatively. There is no consensus as to which axis is best for reducing outliers and preventing malrotation.

METHODS

The SOMA (Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics) database (Stryker) was used to identify 1,351 computed tomography (CT) scans of the entire tibia. Several reference axes for the tibia (including the Mayo axis, Akagi line, Insall line, anterior condylar axis [ACA], posterior condylar axis [PCA], lateral tibial cortex [LTC], Cobb axis, tibial crest line [TCL], and transmalleolar axis [TMA]) were constructed according to published guidelines. The Berger method served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The Mayo method (involving a line connecting the medial and middle one-thirds of the tibial tubercle and the geometric center of the tibia) and the Insall line (involving a line connecting the posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] insertion and the intersection of the middle and medial one-thirds of the tibial tubercle) both had low variability relative to the Berger method (7.8° ± 1.0° and 5.1° ± 2.2°, respectively) and a low likelihood of internal rotation errors (0.7% and 1.8%, respectively). No clinically significant gender-based differences were found (<0.7° for all). The same was true for ethnicity, with the exception of consistently greater tibial intorsion in Asian versus Caucasian individuals (mean difference in TCL position, +4.5° intorsion for Asian individuals; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This CT-based study of 1,351 tibiae (which we believe to be the largest study of its kind) showed that the Mayo and Insall methods (both of which reference the medial and middle one-thirds of the tibial tubercle) offer an ideal balance of accuracy, low variability, and a reduced likelihood of internal rotation errors. Setting rotation on the basis of distal landmarks (tibial shaft and beyond) may predispose surgeons to substantial malrotation errors, especially given the differences in tibial torsion found between ethnic groups in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Different rotational alignment of tibial component should be selected for varied tibial tubercle locations in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to identify how the accuracy of the tibial rotation reference axes varied in populations with different tibial tubercle locations. We hypothesized that the accuracy of the axes of tibial rotation would be affected by the changes of tibial tubercle locations.

METHODS

Surgical epicondylar axis (SEA), medial third of the patellar tendon (1/3MPT), medial third of the tibial tuberosity (1/3MTT), medial border of the tibial tuberosity (MTT) and Akagi line were drawn. The angle between SEA and horizontal line with the angle between the four tibial rotation axes and the horizontal line was compared by T test. Then, the correlation between TTTG with the angles between the four axes and SEA vertical lines was analyzed. The TTTG was divided into three subgroups (TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, TTTG ≥ 15 mm), then t test was performed for the angles between the vertical lines of the SEA and the four rotation axes of the tibia in each group.

RESULTS

Among the four tibial rotation axes, only the difference between MTT and the line perpendicular to SEA had no statistical significance (NS.). The four tibial rotational axes were all positively correlated with TTTG (p < 0.001). When TTTG ≥ 15 mm, Akagi line was 2.5° ± 6.9°internally rotated to the line perpendicular to SEA, while the 1/3MPT and MTT was 0.9° ± 5.3°and 1.3° ± 5.9°externally rotated to the line perpendicular to the SEA when TTTG < 10 mm and 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MTT showed the best consistency with SEA. TT-TG had a significant positive correlation with all four tibial rotational axes. In patients with TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm and TTTG ≥ 15 mm, the 1/3MPT, MTT and Akagi line demonstrated good alignment consistency with SEA, respectively.

Correlations of typical pain patterns with SPECT/CT findings in unhappy patients after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The diagnostic process in patients after painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. The more clinical and radiological information about a patient with pain after TKA is included in the assessment, the more reliable and sustainable the advice regarding TKA revision can be. The primary aim was to investigate the position of TKA components and evaluate bone tracer uptake (BTU) using pre-revision SPECT/CT and correlate these findings with previously published pain patterns in painful patients after TKA.

METHODS

A prospectively collected cohort of 83 painful primary TKA patients was retrospectively evaluated. All patients followed a standardized diagnostic algorithm including 99m-Tc-HDP-SPECT/CT, which led to a diagnosis indicating revision surgery. Pain character, location, dynamics and radiation were systematically assessed as well as TKA component position in 3D-CT. BTU was anatomically localized and quantified using a validated localization scheme. Component positioning and BTU were correlated with pain characteristics using non-parametric Spearman correlations (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Based on Spearman's rho, significant correlations were found between pain and patients characteristics and SPECT/CT findings resulting in nine specific patterns. The most outstanding ones include: Pattern 1: More flexion in the femoral component correlated with tender/splitting pain and patella-related pathologies. Pattern 3: More varus in the femoral component correlated with dull/heavy and tingling/stinging pain during descending stairs, unloading and long sitting in patients with high BMI and unresurfaced patella. Pattern 6: More posterior slope in the tibial component correlated with constant pain.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study help to place component positioning in the overall context of the "painful knee arthroplasty" including specific pain patterns. The findings further differentiate the clinical picture of a painful TKA. Knowing these patterns enables a prediction of the cause of the pain to be made as early as possible in the diagnostic process before the state of pain becomes chronic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Failure modes in malrotated total knee replacement

PURPOSE

Achieving normal rotational alignment of both components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for improved knee survivorship and function. However, malrotation is a known complication resulting in higher revision rates. Understanding malrotation of the components and its concomitant clinical and functional outcomes are important for early diagnosis and management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of malrotation on clinical outcomes and failure modes in both single and combined rotational malalignment.

METHODS

From our hospital database of 364 revisions, a cohort of 76 knees with patellar maltracking, stiffness, reduced range of motion and early aseptic failure were reviewed and investigated for component malrotation using computed tomography following Berger protocol. CT findings confirmed component malrotation in 70 of these patients. Investigations included (1) measurement of femoral component malrotation using surgical transepicondylar axis, (2) measurement of tibial component malrotation using anteroposterior axis and (3) measurement of combined component rotational errors.

RESULTS

The correlation of CT analysis and clinical outcomes after primary TKA revealed association of patellar maltracking with femoral internal rotation, pain and instability with tibial internal rotation and knee stiffness in patients with combined component malrotation as the commonest mode of presentation. Our study showed that patients with isolated femoral, tibial and combined malrotation presented at a mean period of 3.4 ± 1.34, 1.7 ± 0.8 and 2.3 ± 0.69 years, respectively, after the index surgery. Post-revision, the mean Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score improved from 29.1 to 78.7, and 10.5 to 32.8, respectively, and the mean range of motion improved from 74.9 ± 24.8 to 97.1 ± 12.7 degrees at a mean follow-up of 42 months.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of malrotation in TKA and its management with revision of both components can lead to better clinical and functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone.

METHODS

The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Study on the morphological characteristics and rotational alignment axis of placement plane of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty for hemophilia-related knee arthritis

Background

Abnormal epiphyseal growth plate development of the proximal tibia in hemophilia patients leads to notable morphological changes in the mature knee joint. This study aimed to compare the morphological characteristics of tibial component placement cut surface in patients with hemophilic arthritis (HA) and osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine the tibial component rotational alignment axis’ best position for HA patients.

Methods

Preoperative computed tomography scans of 40 OA and 40 HA patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were evaluated using a three-dimensional (3D) software. The tibial component’s placement morphological parameters were measured. The tibial component’s rotational mismatch angles were evaluated, and the most appropriate 0°AP axis position for HA patients was investigated.

Results

In the two groups, the morphology was significantly different in some of the parameters (p < 0.05). The tibial component rotational mismatch angles were significantly different between both groups (p < 0.05). The medial 9.26° of the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon was the point through which 0°AP axis passed for the HA patients. Similarly, the medial 13.02° of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle was also the point through which the 0°AP axis passed.

Conclusions

The ratio of the anteroposterior length to the geometric transverse length of the placement section of the tibial component in HA patients was smaller than that in OA patients. The medial 9.26° of the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon or the medial 13.02° of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle seem to be an ideal reference position of the rotational alignment axis of the tibial component for HA patients.

A New Reference Axis for Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

The purpose of this study was to introduce a new reference axis for tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and verify its reliability. A consecutive series of 80 knees that underwent TKA from 2018 to 2020 as well as 80 healthy knees were analyzed using a three-dimensional tibial model. A coordinate system was established based on the standard TKA tibial cut. The line connecting the lateral-tibial eminence and the medial 1/3rd of the tibial tubercle or the medial border of the tibial tubercle was identified as the lateral eminence line (LE line) and the medial lateral eminence line (MLE line), respectively. To evaluate the reliability of the new reference axis, Akagi's line, the medial third of the tibial tubercle (1/3 line) was compared with the LE and MLE lines by measuring the angle between the lines and the Z-axis. In the coronal view, the intersection angle (TPA), which is composed of the line connecting the center of the medial and lateral tibial plateau with the Z-axis, was measured. The mean angle between Akagi's line and the Z-axis in the healthy group and the osteoarthritis (OA) group was 87.57 ± 3.48° and 87.61 ± 3.47°, respectively. The mean angle between the LE line and Z-axis in the healthy and OA groups was 87.15 ± 4.13° and 86.78 ± 3.95°, respectively. A weak correlation was found between the TPA and Akagi's line and the 1/3 line. A moderate correlation was observed between the TPA and LE lines. There were no significant differences between the healthy and OA groups (P > 0.05) in any of the four reference axes. The LE line showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability and reproducibility. The novel and easily drawn LE line is a preferable option for tibial component rotational alignment in TKA.

Accuracy and Validity of Sharma's Venn Diagram Method for Assessment of Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Malrotation of the tibial component in a total knee replacement leads to anterior knee pain, patella dislocations, extensor mechanism disruptions, knee stiffness and prosthesis loosening. Techniques like free-floating technique, medial 1/3 rd of the tibial tubercle, medial border of the tibial tuberosity, Akagi's line, transcondylar line of tibia, posterior condylar line of tibia, midsulcus of tibial spines, curve on curve technique have been advocated. None of these have been shown to be accurate and reproducible. We developed a novel 'Sharma's Venn Diagram' method to assess the tibial component rotation.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive knee replacements were included in a prospective observational study. The average age of the study group was 53.6 years (48-76 years) Thirty-one were females and 3 were males. The patients were followed a minimum of one years (max 2 years, average 1.8 years). 'Sharma's Venn diagram Method (C)' was compared to free-floating method (F) and post-op CT scans using Berger protocol (B).

RESULTS

Tibial rotation calculated using Sharma's Venn diagram method (C) coincided with the final component placement in 50/52 knees. The free floating method (F) coincided with method (C) in 30/52 knees with an average 4.8° external rotation in 5 knees and an average of 5.2° internal rotation in 17 knees. Bland Altman method was used to compare method (C) with Method (F), The difference was statistically significant p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Sharma's Venn diagram method is reliable, accurate and easily reproducible by any surgeon performing tkr and correlates with postoperative 2D CT-based assessment of tibial component rotation.

LEVEL II STUDY

Prospective observational study.

New evaluation indices for rotational knee angles in standing anteroposterior knee radiographs

BACKGROUND

Identifying the time course of rotational knee alignment is crucial for elucidating the etiology in knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to propose new rotational indices for calculating the change in relative rotational angles between the femur and tibia in standing anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.

METHODS

Forty healthy elderly volunteers (20 women and 20 men; mean age, 70 ± 6 years) were assessed. The evaluation parameters were as follows: (1) femoral rotational index: the distance between the sphere center of the medial posterior femoral condyle and the lateral edge of the patella, and (2) tibial rotational index: the distance between the medial eminence of the tibia and the lateral edge of the fibula head. The indices were standardized by the diameter of the sphere of the medial posterior femoral condyle. This study (1) identified the relationship between changes in rotational indices and the simulated rotational knee angles in the standing position, (2) proposed a regression equation for the change in relative rotational angles between the femur and tibia in standing AP radiographs, and (3) verified the accuracy of the regression equation.

RESULTS

The rotational indices increased in direct proportion to simulated rotational knee angles (femoral index: r > 0.9,p < 0.0001; tibial index: r > 0.9, p < 0.0001). Based on the results, the regression equation with the accuracy of 0.45 ± 0.26° was determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed regression equations can potentially predict the change in relative rotational angles between the femur and tibia in a pair of standing AP radiographs taken at different dates in longitudinal studies.

Preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty: reliability of axial alignment using a three-dimensional planning approach

BACKGROUND

Preoperative templating of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can nowadays be performed three-dimensionally with software solutions using computed tomography (CT) datasets. Currently there is no consensus concerning the axial orientation of TKA components in three-dimensional (3D) planning.

PURPOSE

To assess intra-/inter-observer reliability of detection of different bony landmarks in planning axial component alignment using axial CT images and 3D reconstructions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determination of four predefined axial femoral and tibial axes was calculated using data from CT scans. Axes determination was performed on the axial slices and on the 3D reconstruction using preoperative planning software. In summary, 61 datasets were analyzed by one medical student (intra-observer reliability) and 15 datasets were analyzed by four different observers independently (inter-observer reliability).

RESULTS

For the femur, clinical epicondylar axis and posterior condylar axis showed the best reliability with an inter-observer variability of 0.7° and 0.5°, respectively. For the tibia, posterior condylar axis provided best reliability (inter-observer variability: 1.7°). Overall variability was greater for tibial than for femoral axes. Reliability of axis determination was more accurate using axial CT slices rather than 3D reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

The femoral clinical epicondylar axis is highly reliable. Landmarks for the tibia are not as easily identifiable as for the femur. The tibial posterior condylar axis presents the axis with highest reliability. Based on these results, clinical epicondylar axis for orientation of the femoral TKA component and posterior condylar axis for the tibial implant, both defined on axial slices can be recommended.

The medial tangent of the proximal tibia is a suitable extra-articular landmark in determining the tibial anteroposterior axis

BACKGROUND

Tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is generally determined based on intra-articular structure, and can be difficult to ascertain in some cases. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the medial tangent angle of the tibia (MTAT) could be useful in determining the anteroposterior axis of the tibia.

METHODS

This study was performed on 103 lower limbs in 53 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. The selection criteria for our study were based on the assumption that knees in patients undergoing THA exhibit fewer degenerative changes than knees in patients undergoing TKA. Using computed tomography images, the MTAT, comprising the medial tangent of the proximal tibia and the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the tibia, was measured on three horizontal planes: at the distal edge of the tibial tubercle (A), at 5 cm distally (B), and at 10 cm further distally (C). The tibial medial surface was grouped into three classes according to shape: valley type, flat type, and hill type. The percentage at which these shapes were observed in each group was also calculated. Measurement reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The angles were 45.2° (interquartile range: IR 43.0-47.7) at A, 42.7° (IR 38.7-45.9) at B, and 42.4° (IR 38.2-45.9) at C. Intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability was 0.982 and 0.974 at A, 0.810 and 0.411 at B, and 0.940 and 0.811 at C, respectively. Regarding the tibial medial surface, the valley type was observed in all cases at A, and the hill type was observed in the highest percentage of cases at B and C.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTAT was approximately 45° at level A, and reproducibility was the highest among the three groups. The two points forming the valley on the tibial medial surface were bony ridges. Therefore, the medial tangent of the tibia at level A could be easily determined. Because the distal edge of the tibial tubercle exists at the surgical area and the extra-articular area, it can be a suitable intraoperative, extra-articular landmark in determining the tibial AP axis, even for revision TKA.

A new technique for determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effectiveness of our new technique "Range of motion-anatomical (ROM-A) technique" which is the combination of the self-positioning technique "Range of motion (ROM) technique" and the anatomical landmarks technique in determining the tibial component (TC) rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation system.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 103 knees who underwent TKA. The ROM-A technique was consisted of two steps. First, the TC was set and marked by the ROM technique in knee extension. Second, the TC was set according to the marking in the knee flexion and the component rotational angle relative to the anatomical tibial anteroposterior (AP) axis was adjusted between 0° and 10° external rotation using the navigation system. The rotational angle of TC relative to the anatomical AP axis was measured using postoperative computed tomography. Moreover, the hypothetical rotational angle of the TC in the ROM technique was calculated only from the intraoperative difference between the two techniques.

RESULTS

The actual rotational angle by the ROM-A technique was externally rotated 3.0°, and the rotational outlier occurred in 3.0%. A significant difference in outlier rate was observed between the two techniques (p = 0.03). The hypothetical rotational angle of TC determined by the ROM technique (the first step only in the ROM-A technique) was externally rotated 4.6° and the TC rotational outlier (difference to AP axis: >10°) occurred in 11.7%.

CONCLUSION

Using the ROM-A technique, the TC was finally fixed in almost all targeted rotational positions, and this technique could reduce the anatomical rotational outlier compared with the ROM technique.

[Progress in the method of tibial prosthesis rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the methods of tibial prosthesis rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty, and provide reference for clinicians to select and further study the methods of tibial prosthesis rotation alignment.

METHODS

The advantages and disadvantages of various tibial prosthesis rotation alignment methods were analyzed and summarized by referring to the relevant literature at home and abroad in recent years.

RESULTS

There are many methods for tibial prosthesis rotation alignment, including reference to relevant anatomical landmarks, range of motion (ROM) technique, computer-assisted navigation, and personalized osteotomy. The inner one-third of the tibial tuberosity is a more accurate reference anatomical landmark, but the obesity, severe knee deformity and dysplasia have impacts on the precise placement of the tibial prosthesis. ROM technique do not need to refer to the anatomical landmark of the tibia, and aren't affected by landmark variation. It can be used for severe knee valgus deformity and the landmarks that are difficult to identify. However, it may cause internal rotation of tibial prosthesis. Computer- assisted navigation and personalized osteotomy can achieve more accurate alignment in sagittal, coronal, and rotational alignment of femoral prosthesis. However, due to the lack of reliable anatomical landmarkers related to tibia fixation, it is still controversial whether it can help the alignment of tibial prosthesis rotation.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon should master the methods of rotation and alignment of tibial prosthesis, make preoperative plans, select appropriate alignment methods for different patients, and achieve individualization. Meanwhile, several anatomical landmarkers should be referred to properly during the operation, which can be used to detect the correct placement of tibial prosthesis and avoid large rotation error.

Evaluation of tibial rotational axis in total knee arthroplasty using magnetic resonance imaging

Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment of the tibial component are thought to play a significant role in the outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In addition, tibial component malrotation is associated with pain, stiffness, and altered patellofemoral kinematics in TKA. However, measuring tibial component rotation after TKA is difficult. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in TKA. To investigate the morphology of the tibial plateau, 977 patients' knees (829 females and 148 males) were evaluated using MRI. The relationships between the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA), Akagi line, posterior tibial margin (PTM), medial third of the tibial tubercle (MTT), and anatomical tibial axis (ATS) were investigated in this study. In addition, gender difference in tibial rotational alignment were evaluated. Relative to the TEA, the MTT and ATS were externally rotated by 0.5° ± 4.4° and 0.5° ± 5.4°, respectively, while Akagi line and PTM were internally rotated by 3.7° ± 4.5° and 9.9° ± 6.1°, respectively. Gender differences were found in MTT, Akagi line and ATS (P < 0.05). Our result showed that the rotational alignment led to notable variance between femoral and tibial components using fixed bone landmarks. The MTT and ATS axes showed the closest perpendicular aspect with projected TEA. And the MTT and Akagi axes showed the reduced variance. In addition, PTM is not a reliable landmark for rotation of the tibial component. Based on the results of this study, surgeons may choose the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component in order to reduce rotational mismatch and improve clinical outcomes.

Three-point Method to Guide the Tibial Resection and Component Placing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To introduce a three‐point method combining the midpoint of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the midsulcus of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to determine appropriate tibial resection and component placing during TKA and to compare this method with Insall's 1/3 method.

Methods

A consecutive series of 128 knees that underwent TKA from January 2015 to August 2018 were analyzed. In one group (64 knees), the medial 1/3 of tibial tubercle (the Insall's traditional method) was used for tibial component alignment. In the other group (64 knees), the three‐point line connecting the midpoint of the PCL, the midpoint of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the ACL was used for tibial component alignment. Both groups used the anterior tibial tendon as the distal reference for tibial resection. The coronal alignment error of the tibial component was determined by the angle between the line parallel to the tibial component platform and the tibial mechanical axis measured on postoperative radiograph. The axial rotation error of the femoral or tibial component was the intersection angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and a line tangent to the posterior edge of the femoral or tibial component measured on CT. The coronal and axial alignment errors were compared between the two groups.

Results

The average coronal alignment error of the tibial component in the three‐point method group was 0.2° ± 1.4° versus − 0.9° ± 1.8°in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in the three‐point method group reduced by 37.3% compared to Insall's traditional method group. The average axial rotation error of the femoral component was 0.2° ± 1.2° in the three‐point method group versus − 1.1° ± 1.7° in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in three‐point method group decreased by 43.9% compared to Insall's traditional method group. The average axial rotation error of the tibial component was 0.4° ± 1.4° versus − 1.4° ± 1.8° in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in the three‐point method group reduced by 35.5% compared to the Insall's traditional method group. The rates of rotation outliers were significantly lower in the three‐point method group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The line connecting the midpoint of the PCL, the midsulcus of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the ACL could be used as the reference for the tibial resection and component placing. This method appears to be more accurate than Insall's 1/3 method. The results of this study provide a candidate method for component orientation with little error.

The femoral trochlear anterior line is a better alternative intra-operative reference compared to femoral anterior tangent line for femoral rotation in both genders in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

To determine the most reliable reference axis for the femoral component rotation in TKA patients by comparing the trochlear anterior line (TAL) and the femoral anterior tangent line (FAT). To evaluate the variability of each anatomic parameter in a Korean population.

Methods

Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were taken for 500 patients (400 females and 100 males) with knee joint osteoarthritis who had Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3 and 4 prior to TKA in our institution between February 2016 and September 2017. It was investigated that whether significant differences in variance and gender exist for TAL and FAT.

Results

TAL and the FAT were internally rotated by 5.1° ± 3.1° and 6.8° ± 6.1°, respectively, about the Transepicondylar axis (TEA). Although no gender-related differences were found for the TAL, they were found for the FAT. The variance of the TAL with respect to the TEA was significantly smaller compared with that for the FAT and thus exhibited a more consistent distribution. In addition, such a trend was found for both genders.

Conclusions

The results show that the TAL is a favorable index for appropriate rotational alignment of the femoral component in TKA.

Optimal rotational positioning of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: determined by linker surgical technique using a high definition CT

INTRODUCTION

The rotational alignment of femoral and tibial components is an important determinant of the success of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal rotational position of the tibial component is still unclear. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine the pre-operative S-TEA (surgical-transepicondylar axis) derived tibialanteroposterior (AP) axis angle and postoperative tibial component axis angle using a "Bird's eye" high-definition CT image in TKA performed by Linker surgical technique; (2) to determine the femorotibial mismatch angle; and (3) to determine the optimal tibial component rotation in a well-aligned femoral and tibial components.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

55 knees in 49 osteoarthritis patients who underwent primary TKA by Linker surgical technique were evaluated. Preoperative tibial AP axis angle, and the postoperative tibial component axis angle were measured. Rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components was also measured.

RESULTS

The mean angle of the pre-operative tibial AP axis was 17.8° ± 4.0°, ranging from 4.3° to 25.4°. The mean angle of the post-operative tibial component axis was 16.2° ± 4.9°, ranging from 3.8° to 25.2°. The mean postoperative tibial component axis line was at 14.2% ± 11.9%.

CONCLUSION

Because of the variability of pre-operative S-TEA derived tibial AP axis angle, the tibial component axis angle was also variable among the knees, but the two angles bore a strong correlation to each other. Based on our results, the optimal axis of the tibial component passes about halfway through the medial edge and medial one-third of the tibial tuberosity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Bony landmarks with tibial cutting surface are useful to avoid rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi's Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi's Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis.

METHODS

Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi's Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis).

RESULTS

The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were - 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi's Line), - 4.2° ± 7.7°/- 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), - 5.1° ± 7.9°/- 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, - 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Akagi's Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi's Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

The original Akagi line is the most reliable: a systematic review of landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA

PURPOSE

There is no present consensus on the most reliable anatomical landmarks or axes for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal was therefore to review the literature and compare accuracy and repeatability of different axes for tibial baseplate rotation in TKA.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for articles that reported accuracy in terms of error or discrepancy from the trans-epicondylar axes (TEA), and/or repeatability in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient, of one or more axes used for tibial baseplate rotation in TKA. Twenty-one articles met criteria, and their data were extracted and tabulated.

RESULTS

The selected articles evaluated 15 different axes, 13 for reliability, 12 for repeatability. The lowest errors or discrepancies from the projected TEA were reported for the original 'Akagi line' (posterior cruciate ligament posteriorly to medial border of tibial tuberosity), its variant using the sulcus of the tibial spines as anterior landmark, as well as the anterior tibial border and the curve-on-curve technique. The best inter-observer repeatabilities were reported for 'Akagi line' variants that use the geometric centre of the tibial plateau posteriorly and the medial border of the tibial tuberosity, or the medial sixth of the patellar tendon anteriorly. Considering accuracy and repeatability simultaneously, only two axes were found to satisfy both criteria consistently: the original 'Akagi line' and the anterior tibial border.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the small number of studies found, the collected evidence remains insufficient to recommend reference axes for intra-operative rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in TKA. A combination of two or more anatomical landmarks or projected axes could be used to ensure adequate tibial baseplate rotation, while considering individual patient morphology and implant design to optimize knee kinematics and prevent prosthetic overhang.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Do modern total knee replacements improve tibial coverage?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study is to compare newer designs of various symmetric and asymmetric tibial components and measure tibial bone coverage using the rotational safe zone defined by two commonly utilized anatomic rotational landmarks.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans (CT scans) of one hundred consecutive patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were obtained pre-operatively. A virtual proximal tibial cut was performed and two commonly used rotational axes were added for each image: the medio-lateral axis (ML-axis) and the medial 1/3 tibial tubercle axis (med-1/3-axis). Different symmetric and asymmetric implant designs were then superimposed in various rotational positions for best cancellous and cortical coverage. The images were imported to a public domain imaging software, and cancellous and cortical bone coverage was computed for each image, with each implant design in various rotational positions.

RESULTS

One single implant type could not be identified that provided the best cortical and cancellous coverage of the tibia, irrespective of using the med-1/3-axis or the ML-axis for rotational alignment. However, it could be confirmed that the best bone coverage was dependent on the selected rotational landmark. Furthermore, improved bone coverage was observed when tibial implant positions were optimized between the two rotational axes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial coverage is similar for symmetric and asymmetric designs, but depends on the rotational landmark for which the implant is designed. The surgeon has the option to improve tibial coverage by optimizing placement between the two anatomic rotational alignment landmarks, the medial 1/3 and the ML-axis. Surgeons should be careful assessing intraoperative rotational tibial placement using the described anatomic rotational landmarks to optimize tibial bony coverage without compromising patella tracking.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Three Baseplate Rotational Arrangement Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction

Several ongoing studies aim to improve the survival rate following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which is an effective orthopedic surgical approach for patients with severely painful knee joint diseases. Among the studied strategies, baseplate rotational arrangement techniques for TKA components have been suggested but have been the subject of only simple reliability evaluations. Therefore, this study sought to evaluate comparatively three different baseplate rotational arrangement techniques that are commonly used in a clinical context.

Materials and Methods

Three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of the proximal tibia with TKA were developed and analyzed considering three baseplate rotational arrangement techniques (anterior cortex line, tibial tuberosity one-third line, and tibial tuberosity end line) for six activities of daily life (ADLs) among patients undergoing TKA. Mechanical tests based on the ASTM F1800 standard to validate the FE models were then performed using a universal testing machine. To evaluate differences in biomechanical characteristics according to baseplate rotational arrangement technique, the strain and peak von Mises stresses (PVMSs) were assessed.

Results

The accuracy of the FE models used in this study was high (94.7 ± 5.6%). For the tibial tuberosity one-third line rotational arrangement technique, strains ≤ 50 µstrain (the critical bone damage strain, which may affect bone remodeling) accounted for approximately 2.2%-11.3% and PVMSs within the bone cement ranged from 19.4 to 29.2 MPa, in ADLs with high loading conditions. For the tibial tuberosity end line rotational arrangement, strains ≤ 50 µstrain accounted for approximately 2.3%-13.3% and PVMSs within the bone cement ranged from 13.5 to 26.7 MPa. For anterior cortex line rotational arrangement techniques, strains ≤50 µstrain accounted for approximately 10.6%-16.6% and PVMSs within the bone cement ranged from 11.6 to 21.7 MPa.

Conclusion

The results show that the most recently developed frontal cortex line rotational alignment technique is the same or better than the other two rotational alignment techniques in terms of biomechanics. This finding can be, however, dependent on the contact characteristics between the baseplate and the proximal tibia. That is, it is indicated that the optimum baseplate rotational arrangement technique in terms of reducing the incidence of TKA mechanical failure can be achieved by adjusting the characteristics of contact between the baseplate and the proximal tibia.

Extrinsic Factors as Component Positions to Bone and Intrinsic Factors Affecting Postoperative Rotational Limb Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the factors affecting postoperative rotational limb alignment of the tibia relative to the femur. We hypothesized that not only component positions but also several intrinsic factors were associated with postoperative rotational limb alignment.

METHODS

This study included 99 knees (90 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 77 ± 6 years. A three-dimensional (3D) assessment system was applied under weight-bearing conditions to biplanar long-leg radiographs using 3D-to-2D image registration technique. The evaluation parameters were (1) component position; (2) preoperative and postoperative coronal, sagittal, and rotational limb alignment; (3) preoperative bony deformity, including femoral torsion, condylar twist angle, and tibial torsion; and (4) preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

In multiple linear regression analysis using a stepwise procedure, postoperative rotational limb alignment was associated with the following: (1) rotation of the component position (tibia: β = 0.371, P < .0001; femur: β = -0.327, P < .0001), (2) preoperative rotational limb alignment (β = 0.253, P = .001), (3) postoperative flexion angle (β = 0.195, P = .007), and (4) tibial torsion (β = 0.193, P = .010).

CONCLUSION

In addition to component positions, the intrinsic factors, such as preoperative rotational limb alignment, ROM, and tibial torsion, affected postoperative rotational limb alignment. On a premise of correct component positions, the intrinsic factors that can be controlled by surgeons should be taken care. In particular, ROM is necessary to be improved within the possible range to acquire better postoperative rotational limb alignment.

Variation in tibial tuberosity lateralization and distance from the tibiofemoral joint line: An anatomic study

BACKGROUND

To describe variation in tibial tuberosity position in a normal adult population and inter-rater reliability of measurements of tibial tuberosity position.

METHODS

Surface models of 161 proximal tibia specimens (83 female, 78 male; 80 black, 81 white; age 28.7years, SD 7.5) were created with a three-dimensional laser scanner. Percent lateralization, tuberosity-eminence angle, and distance from joint surface were measured for each specimen. Variation in tuberosity position by sex, race, age, height, and BMI was calculated. Multivariate regression was used to assess for demographic factors independently associated with tuberosity positioning.

RESULTS

Mean percent lateralization was 57.9% (SD 2.4, range 52.4-64.9%). Tuberosity-eminence angle mean was 11.03° (SD 2.8, range 0-18.7°). Percent lateralization and tuberosity-eminence angle were not influenced by sex, race, age, height or, BMI (p>0.05). Mean tuberosity distance from joint surface was 29.2mm (SD 3.5, range 16.6-38.6mm) and larger in males than females (30.7mm (SD 2.9), 27.6mm (SD 3.3); p<0.001). Tuberosity distance from joint surface increased 0.18mm on average per 1.0cm increase in height (p<0.001). Inter-rater reliability was high for distance from joint surface (Cronbach alpha=0.99) and percent lateralization.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial tuberosity percent lateralization falls in a narrow range for individuals, whereas tuberosity-eminence angle and distance from joint line are more variable. Inter-rater reliability is high for percent lateralization and distance for the joint surface. Distance of tibial tuberosity from joint surface is associated with sex and height.

Tibial component coverage and rotational alignment accuracy after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Tibial component coverage (TCC) and tibial rotational angle (TRA) have been studied simultaneously in simulations, but not in clinical studies after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate TCC and rotational setting postoperatively in mobile-bearing TKA patients and (2) to compare the results with previously published simulation data.

METHODS

We prospectively examined 100 patients who underwent primary TKA using the LCS^® Total Knee System (LCS) posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prosthesis. Clinical outcomes, TCC (coverage area of the tibial component over the tibia), and TRA (relative to the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA)) were assessed. Quantitative three-dimensional computed tomography was used to assess TCC and TRA. All values are expressed as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) using minus (-) for internal and plus (+) for external rotation.

RESULTS

Hospital for Special Surgery scores improved from 46 (36, 50) preoperatively to 92 (90, 92) postoperatively. TRA showed a median divergence of - 2.0° (- 4.75°, + 2.74°). All knees were located within 10° of the TEA (range - 10.0° to + 9.7°). The median TCC of the knees was 82.7% (80.6, 84.7%), and there were no knees that hung over the tibial component in any direction.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCS prosthesis had good clinical outcomes, comparable TCC, and improved TRA as compared to previous reports, as all knees were located within 10° of the TEA. Simultaneous optimization of both TCC and TRA may contribute to the excellent long-term outcomes that have been observed with this system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Prognostic study.

Anterior tibial curved cortex is a reliable landmark for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Background

Rotational alignment of the tibial component is important for long-term success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to compare five axes in normal and osteoarthritic (OA) knees to determine a reliable landmark for tibial rotational alignment in TKA.

Methods

One hundred twenty patients with OA knees and 40 with normal knees were included. The angle between a line perpendicular to the surgical transepicondylar axis and each of five axes were measured on preoperative computed tomography. The five axes were as follows: a line from the center of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to the medial border of the patellar tendon (PCL-PT), medial border of the tibial tuberosity (PCL-TT1), medial one-third of the tibial tuberosity (PCL-TT2), and apex of the tibial tuberosity (PCL-TT3), as well as the anteroposterior axis of the tibial prosthesis along the anterior tibial curved cortex (ATCC).

Results

For all five axes tested, the mean angles were smaller in OA knees than in normal knees. In normal knees, the angle of the ATCC axis had the smallest mean value and narrowest range (1.6° ± 2.8°; range, −1.7°–7.7°). In OA knees, the mean angle of the ATCC axis (0.8° ± 2.7°; range, −7.9°–9.2°) was larger than that of the PCL-TT1 axis (0.3° ± 5.5°; range, −19.7°–10.6°) (P = 0.461), while the angle of the ATCC axis had the smallest SD and narrowest range.

Conclusion

The ATCC was found to be the most reliable and useful anatomical landmark for tibial rotational alignment in TKA.

The medial border of the tibial tuberosity as an auxiliary tool for tibial component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to quantify the amount of ensuing internal rotation of the tibial component when positioned along the medial border of the tibial tubercle, thus establishing a reproducible intraoperative reference for tibial component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The angle formed from the tibial geometric centre to the intersection of both lines from the middle of the tibial tuberosity and its medial border was measured in 50 patients. The geometric centre was determined on an axial CT slice at 10 mm below the lateral tibial plateau and transposed to a slice at the level of the most prominent part of the tibial tuberosity. Similar measurements were taken in 25 patients after TKA, in order to simulate the intraoperative appearance of the tibia after making its proximal resection.

RESULTS

This angle was found to be similar (n.s.) in normal and post-TKA tibiae [median 20.4° (range 15°-24°) vs. 20.7° (range 16°-25°), respectively]. In 89.3 % of the patients, the angle ranged from 17° to 24°. No statistical difference (p n.s.) was found between women and men in both normal [median -20.7° (range 16°-25°) vs. 19.9° (range 15°-24°)] and post-TKA tibiae [median 21.4° (range 19°-24°) vs. 20° (range 16°-25°)].

CONCLUSION

This study found that in 90 % of the patients, the medial border of the tibial tuberosity is internally rotated 17°-24° in relation to the line connecting the middle of the tuberosity to the tibial geometric centre. Since this anatomical landmark may be more easily identifiable intraoperatively than the commonly used "medial 1/3", it can provide a better quantitative reference point and help surgeons achieve a more accurate tibial implant rotational position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort and case control studies, Level III.

External torsion in a proximal tibia and internal torsion in a distal tibia occur independently in varus osteoarthritic knees compared to healthy knees

INTRODUCTION

The relative torsional angle of the distal tibia is dependent on a deformity of the proximal tibia, and it is a commonly used torsional parameter to describe deformities of the tibia; however, this parameter cannot show the location and direction of the torsional deformity in the entire tibia. This study aimed to identify the detailed deformity in the entire tibia via a coordinate system based on the diaphysis of the tibia by comparing varus osteoarthritic knees to healthy knees.

METHODS

In total, 61 limbs in 58 healthy subjects (age: 54 ± 18 years) and 55 limbs in 50 varus osteoarthritis (OA) subjects (age: 72 ± 7 years) were evaluated. The original coordinate system based on anatomic points only from the tibial diaphysis was established. The evaluation parameters were 1) the relative torsion in the distal tibia to the proximal tibia, 2) the proximal tibial torsion relative to the tibial diaphysis, and 3) the distal tibial torsion relative to the tibial diaphysis.

RESULTS

The relative torsion in the distal tibia to the proximal tibia showed external torsion in both groups, while the external torsion was lower in the OA group than in the healthy group (p < 0.0001). The proximal tibial torsion relative to the tibial diaphysis had a higher external torsion in the OA group (p = 0.012), and the distal tibial torsion relative to the tibial diaphysis had a higher internal torsion in the OA group (p = 0.004) in comparison to the healthy group.

CONCLUSION

The reverse torsional deformity, showing a higher external torsion in the proximal tibia and a higher internal torsion in the distal tibia, occurred independently in the OA group in comparison to the healthy group. Clinically, this finding may prove to be a pathogenic factor in varus osteoarthritic knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ.

An assessment of femoral rotational alignment of mini-incision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison based on the transepicondylar line from the kneeling view and the intraoperative posterior condylar line

BACKGROUND

Rotational alignment of the distal femur is important in total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to use a roentgenographic technique to evaluate the accuracy of mini-incision total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA) performed based on the transepicondylar line from the kneeling view.

METHODS

Totally 32 patients (aged from 64 to 80 years with an average of 70.9 years) with 46 cases of knee osteoarthritis received MIS TKA were registered. Before surgery, the condylar twist angle was measured from the kneeling view. The bone cut for the external rotation was completed, with regard to the condylar twist angle. The control group including 26 patients (aged from 50 to 89 years with an average of 69.7 years) with 42 cases of knee osteoarthritis underwent TKA with built-in cutting jig design 3 degrees of femoral external rotation. This study is a prospective continuous-time duration analysis study. The level of evidence is IIc.

RESULTS

The mean condylar twist angle was 5.1° in the experimental group and 5.4° in the control group. The mean postoperative angle between the clinical epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar line of the femoral component was 0.46°. The same postoperative angle of the built-in external rotation in the control group was 2.7°. The condylar twist angle was significantly more accurate than the built-in design.

CONCLUSION

Our result substantiates that the kneeling view is practicable and reproducible as the cutting reference for femoral external rotation. The accuracy of the kneeling view shows that the epicondylar axis can be used in smaller wound surgery, such as MIS TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IIc.

Painful knee prosthesis: CT scan to assess patellar angle and implant malrotation

BACKGROUND

According to literature, the incidence of pain in knee prostheses is on the increase. In the last decade Authors have focused attention on rotational alignment of the prosthetic components. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of a new angle, which we define as patellar angle, in order to achieve early diagnosis of malrotation.

METHODS

We set up a retrospective observational study recruiting 100 subjects who had undergone total knee prosthesis. 50 subjects suffered from knee anterior pain and 50 without any symptoms. Through CAT scan and VITREA software®, we were able to study the rotation of prosthetic components. We defined a new angle, which links the tibial component and the patella margins. The angles were measured by two different orthopaedic surgeons blinded to the study.

RESULTS

The patella angle ranged from 10 to 28°, with an average value of 23.2° in the control group; in the study group the angle ranged from 26 to 34°, with an average value of 29.9°.

CONCLUSION

Our data supported the reproducibility and efficacy of new angular value. It would represent a new method to detect tibial rotational malalignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Tibial Tubercle in Valgus Osteoarthritic Knees Is More Laterally Positioned Than in Varus Knees

BACKGROUND

The tibial tubercle (TT) is the most reliable landmark of the tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. However, there is no report comparing the position of the TT between valgus and varus osteoarthritic knees.

METHODS

Using preoperative computed tomography, we measured the TT-posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) distance representing the degree of lateralization of the TT and the angle between Akagi's anteroposterior (AP) axis and the dorsal condylar line (DCL) of the tibia in 36 valgus and 40 varus osteoarthritic knees and compared them.

RESULTS

The mean TT-PCL distances in valgus and varus knees were 26.1 (18.2-36.8) and 17.2 mm (10.3-22.6), respectively, with a significant difference (P < .001). Twenty-four of 36 valgus knees (67%) had abnormal TT-PCL (>24 mm). The mean AP-DCL angles in valgus and varus knees were 103° (95.8°-114.8°) and 93.2° (85.3°-99.6°), respectively, with a significant difference (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The TT in valgus knees was significantly more laterally positioned than in varus knees. Also, Akagi's AP axis in valgus knees was significantly more externally rotated relative to the DCL of the tibia than in varus knees. Attention is necessary to correct rotational alignment without posterolateral overhang of the tibial component during total knee arthroplasty, particularly for valgus knees.

Normal Femorotibial Rotational Alignment and Implications for Total Knee Arthroplasty: an MRI Analysis

BACKGROUND

Rotational alignment of prosthetic components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important to successful outcomes. Component malrotation is a known cause of revision and understanding normal rotational alignment may help recreate normal joint kinematics. To date, no large MRI study assessing femorotibial rotational alignment in nonarthritic knees has been undertaken.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Is Insall's tibial axis a reliable rotational landmark against common femoral rotational axes in the nonarthritic patient population?

METHODS

We reviewed 544 knee MRI scans performed for suspected soft tissue pathology and identified Insall's tibial rotational axis as well as the femoral clinical trans-epicondylar axis (TEAc), femoral surgical trans-epicondylar axis (TEAs), posterior condylar articular axis (PCA), and a modified Eckhoff's cylindrical axis. The perpendiculars of these axes were superimposed on Insall's tibial axis, and the angular differences were measured.

RESULTS

Insall's axis was internally rotated to the TEAc by 1.4°, externally rotated to Eckhoff's cylindrical axis by 1.8°, externally rotated to the TEAs by 2.7°, and externally rotated to the PCA by 3.5°. The mean deviation from 0° (optimal alignment for each femoral axis) was significantly greater for the PCA relative to all other femoral axis.

CONCLUSION

Insall's axis is a reliable landmark for rotational positioning of the tibial component and may optimize femorotibial kinematics in fixed-bearing TKA.

The relationship between the midpoints connecting the tibial attachments of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and the transepicondylar axis: In vivo three-dimensional measurement in the Chinese population

BACKGROUND

To determine the relationship between the midpoints connecting the tibial attachments of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL and PCL, APCL line) and the transepicondylar axis (TEA) in normal healthy Chinese, as well as the comparison with other rotational lines.

METHODS

Left knees of 17 male and 15 female healthy Chinese volunteers were scanned by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) respectively. 3D contours of each knee, the tibial attachments of ACL, PCL, the medial and lateral collateral ligaments were reconstructed separately from CT and MRI data. Using an iterative closest point algorithm, we superimposed them individually. The APCL line, the tibial posterior condylar line (PC line), the medial third of the tibial tubercle (1/3 line), the Akagi's line, and the midsulcus of the tibial spine (Midsulcus line), the clinical and surgical TEA (CTEA and STEA) were determined. The paired intersection angles of them were measured.

RESULTS

The mean angle CTEA with APCL line, Akagi's line, Midsulcus line, 1/3 line, and PC line, respectively, was 90.3°±2.9°, 95.0°±3.0°, 94.0°±3.9°, 102.4°±2.7°, and 87.1°±3.0°. The APCL-CTEA was significant different than other angles (p<0.001). The mean angle STEA to the above lines, respectively, was 94.8°±3.1°, 99.4°±3.1°, 98.5°±4.0°, 106.9°±2.9°, and 91.6°±3.2°. The PC line-STEA was significantly different than other angles (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

APCL line was the closest perpendicular to the CTEA in normal Chinese subjects comparing with other rotational lines.

Preoperative assessment of femoral rotation and its relationship with coronal alignment: A magnetic resonance imaging study

This MRI study explores the individual variation of the rotational axes of the distal femur, and investigate the relationship of this variation with overall coronal alignment in the osteoarthritic knee,The mean surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) was 1.7°, anatomical epicondylar axis (AEA) 5.6° and AP trochlea axis (APA) 94.3° external rotation, compared to the posterior condylar line. Investigating this relationship between different coronal alignment groups, there were statistically significant differences between excessive varus and excessive valgus knees for SEA (0.9:3.0 p < 0.001) and AEA (4.7:7.0 p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference for APA (93.9:95.3 p = 0.238).

Assessing Tibial Tray Rotation in TKA: A Cadaveric Study

Tibial anatomical landmarks for transverse plane rotation of the tibial tray have not been validated. The current authors propose aligning the tibial tray with both the anterior tibial center point of rotation (ATCPR) and the femoral trochlear groove (FTG) to establish the ideal tibial tray rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). When the tibial tray centerline was aligned with ATCPR and FTG lines, the mean range of motion (ROM) was 144.3° (preoperatively 145°) and tibial rotation range was 22.8 mm (preoperatively, 24.9 mm). When the tibial component was rotated 5 mm medially to the ATCPR, the knee ROM decreased in flexion with patellar subluxation, while it decreased in extension when rotated 5 mm laterally. This method identifies the ideal tibial tray rotation in TKA, at which maximal range of tibial rotation and knee ROM are achieved without obvious overriding of components. [Orthopedics, 2016; 39(3):S67-S71.].

Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs

OBJECTIVES

Initial stability of tibial trays is crucial for long-term success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both primary and revision settings. Rotating platform (RP) designs reduce torque transfer at the tibiofemoral interface. We asked if this reduced torque transfer in RP designs resulted in subsequently reduced micromotion at the cemented fixation interface between the prosthesis component and the adjacent bone.

METHODS

Composite tibias were implanted with fixed and RP primary and revision tibial trays and biomechanically tested under up to 2.5 kN of axial compression and 10° of external femoral component rotation. Relative micromotion between the implanted tibial tray and the neighbouring bone was quantified using high-precision digital image correlation techniques.

RESULTS

Rotational malalignment between femoral and tibial components generated 40% less overall tibial tray micromotion in RP designs than in standard fixed bearing tibial trays. RP trays reduced micromotion by up to 172 µm in axial compression and 84 µm in rotational malalignment models.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced torque transfer at the tibiofemoral interface in RP tibial trays reduces relative component micromotion and may aid long-term stability in cases of revision TKA or poor bone quality.Cite this article: Mr S. R. Small. Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:122-129. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000481.

Measuring tibial component rotation of TKA in MRI: What is reproducible?

PURPOSE

Correct rotational alignment of components is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Defining landmarks on the tibia that allow for reproducible measurement of component rotation seems to be more challenging than on the femoral side. This study compares the reproducibility of three different measurement techniques.

SCOPE

A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of 55 patients following TKA was conducted. The rotation of the tibial components was determined using three different reference lines: a tangent to the posterior tibial margin, the tibial epicondylar axis, and the tibial tubercle. Data were analyzed for intra- and inter-observer reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and a variance comparison between measurement techniques via F-test.

RESULTS

Highest reliability and lowest variances for measurement of tibial component rotation were achieved by relation to the tibial epicondylar axis and posterior tibial margin. The tibial tubercle proved to be less reliable (ICC 0.632 (interobserver) and 0.526 (intraobserver)), and variances were significantly higher in comparison with the other two techniques.

CONCLUSION

Based on the presented MRI data, measurements of the tibial component rotation are done best using the posterior tibial margin and the tibial epicondylar axis. The tibial tubercle measurement proved to be less reliable for this purpose. We suggest that all three reference lines will be used for assessment of a painful knee following TKA to allow for informed decision making and for choice of best treatment options for the patient.

Rotational alignment of tibial components in mobile-bearing TKA: posterior substituted vs. PCL retaining

PURPOSE

The medial border of the tibial tubercle (MBTT) is one of the fixed anatomic landmarks for tibial component setting during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In mobile-bearing TKA using a tibial cut first technique, the final tibial component rotation can be guided by the position it achieves following several flexion-extension cycles. In this study, tibial component angle (TCA) and tibial rotational angle (TRA) were determined in dependence of retention or resection of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

METHODS

The TCA and TRA were examined in 206 patients who underwent primary TKA (PCL retaining: 104 knees, PCL substituting: 102 knees). The tibial component rotation was intraoperatively setting between the parallel to the axis of the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle as the anterior anatomic landmark and the center of the tibial component as the posterior landmark at the maximum coverage with the osteotomized tibial plateau with its adjustment after several knee flexion-extension exercises. A postoperative quantitative three-dimensional computed tomography technique was used for measurements by a single observer.

RESULTS

The TCA showed a divergence of 0.21° external to the MBTT in the PCL-retaining design and 1.62° internal divergence in the PCL-substituting design. The TRA showed an internal divergence of 0.88° in the PCL-retaining design and an internal divergence of 2.12° in the PCL-substituting design. There were no significant differences between the two designs.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBTT might be regarded as a reliable landmark for obtaining an acceptable tibial rotational setting in mobile-bearing TKA despite PCL retention.

MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants

Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning.

A novel technique using sensor-based technology to evaluate tibial tray rotation

Rotational tibiofemoral congruency and centralized patellar tracking are critical technical factors that affect the postoperative success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several techniques are used to position the femoral component, but there is no validated method for achieving the ideal rotational position of the tibial component. It has been suggested that referencing the midmedial third of the tibial tubercle intraoperatively mitigates positional outliers. This study used data collected from intraoperative sensors to quantify the variability associated with using the midmedial third of the tibial tubercle in 170 patients undergoing primary TKA. With the sensor-equipped trial insert in place, the knee was taken into extension and the location of the femoral condylar contact point on the articular surface of the tibial insert was displayed. Rotational adjustments of the tibial tray were evaluated in real time as the surgeon corrected tray malpositioning. The initial and final angles of tibial tray rotation were captured and recorded with intraoperative video feed. When referencing the tubercle, 53% of patients had asymmetric tibiofemoral congruency in extension. Of those patients, 68% had excessive internal rotation of the tibial tray relative to the femur and 32% had excessive external rotation. The average tibiofemoral incongruency deviated from a neutral position by 6° (range, 0.5°-19.2°). Data from this evaluation suggest that use of the tibial tubercle to maximize tibiofemoral congruency is highly variable and inconsistent for confirming the final rotation of the tibial tray.

Tibial torsion among filipinos: a cadaveric study

ABSTRACT

Tibial torsion, the twisting of the tibia about its long axis, can affect rotational positioning in total knee replacement. This angle varies depending on the ethnicity of the subject. There are no published studies to date to determine the tibial torsion among Filipinos. In this study, 28 cadaveric limbs were examined. Our results show that the average tibial torsion among adult Filipinos is 28.9°.

KEY WORDS

Tibial torsion, Filipinos, cadaveric.